Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94913
題名: 風險值與波動性共整合: 長期記憶模型
Value at Risk and Volatility Comovement with Long Memory Models
作者: 劉尚銘
Liu, Shang Ming
貢獻者: 謝淑貞
Shieh, Shwu Jane
劉尚銘
Liu, Shang Ming
關鍵詞: 風險值
長期記憶
分數共整合
Value at Risk
long memory
fractional cointegration
日期: 2009
上傳時間: 9-May-2016
摘要: 金融自由化後,金融商品交易的多樣性在活絡金融市場方面佔有很重的份量,也使得投資者有更多樣化的投資管道及標地。投資者購買金融商品除了追求較高的報酬外,對於投資風險的管理也是不容乎視。2007年,美國的次級房貸subprimemortgage風爆使得雷曼兄弟和AIG集團爆發財務危機,正是投資者追求高報酬之後,在風險管理上並未妥善管理所造成。\n  \n  衡量風險時,通常會使用變異數或標準差當做衡量指標,即在衡量其波動性,因此波動性裏含有許多訊息。在本論文中,我們將探討波動性所透露出來的兩個訊息,一個是風險值(VaR),文中將分別使用二種衡量可解釋長期記憶的GARCH模型探討台股指數期貨及新加坡的摩台股指數期貨這兩個期貨市場的VaR。另外則是試圖尋找出這兩個期貨市場殘差值的波動性之間的長期共整合關係。\n\n 本論文主要由三篇文章組成,第一篇是利用Baillie, Bollerslev, and Millelsen (1996) 所提出的長期記憶模型FIGARCH來計算台指期貨的風險值(VaR);第二篇也是利用長期記憶模型來計算新加坡的摩台指期貨的風險值,但這次的長期記憶模型增加一個由Tse (1998) 提出的可以考慮不對稱性波動的FIAPARCH模型。\n\n  這兩個模型都搭配三種不同的分配來計算VaR,分別是Normal, Student-t和skewed Student-t分配;實證結果顯示,這兩個期貨市場報酬的波動皆具有長期記憶,表示之前影響指數期貨報酬率的因素對未來指數期貨報酬率會有較長時間的影響力。而在傳統認為差殘值服從常態分配的假定下所計算出的VaR的配適情況較以Student-t分配計算出的VaR的配適情況不具效率,這除了說明傳統的常態分配假說在計算此兩個指數期貨報酬率是不適用之外,亦得出他們是具有肥尾(厚尾)的現象。\n\n  第三篇則是結合前兩篇的結果來探討此兩個指數期貨報酬率之間的波動性是否具有長期關係。因為台指期貨報酬率與摩台指期貨報酬率的波動性皆具有長期記憶,故在此部分,利用Engle-Granger (1987) 的兩階段共整合模型來求此兩個指數期貨報酬率之間的波動性是否存在長期關係。實證結果顯示,他們確實存在長期共整合關係,且摩台指期貨報酬率的波動性較台指期貨報酬率的波動性強,因此我們可以在台指期貨市場買入期指,而在新加坡的摩台指期貨市場避險
The finance commodity exchange`s multiplicity holds the very heavy component in the detachable money market aspect, after the financial liberalization. It also enables the investor to have many chances and commodities of investment. The investor purchases the financial commodity besides the higher reward, and does not allow regarding investment risk`s management to regard. In 2007, the securitization commodity violation of US`s subprimemortgage explodes causes Lehman Brothers and the AIG group erupts the financial crisis. This is precisely the investor pursues the high reward, and their administration centers have not created properly in the risk management.\n\nWhen we measure risks, we usually adopt the variance or the standard deviation. That is to weight its property of volatilities. There is much information in the volatilities. In this thesis, we discussed two kinds of information which the property of volatilities discloses. One is the value at risk (VaR hereafter). In this article, we use long-term memory`s GARCH model to explain that the VaR of Taiwan stock index futures returns and Singapore`s MSCI Taiwan index futures returns. Moreover, we attempts to seek for whether there are long relationship of the residuals volatilities between these two futures markets. \n \nThis thesis was combined by three essays. The first essay employed the FIGARCH model of Baillie, Bollerslev, and Millelsen (1996) to calculated the VaR of Taiwan stock index futures returns. The second essay employed the FIGARCH model and FIAPARCH model of Tse (1998) to calculated the VaR of Singapore`s MSCI Taiwan index futures returns.\n\n We calculated the VaRs of the different two futures markets by using the FIGARCH and FIAPARCH models with three different distributions-normal, student-t and skewed student-t. The empirical results showed the two futures markets both has long memory. It is not efficient to calculated the VaRs by using the traditional normal distribution. The Student-t distribution fitted the model better than the normal distribution.\n\n The third essay, we employed the Engle-Granger (1987) two-step cointegration model to test whether there are long relationship of the residuals volatilities between the Taiwan stock index futures returns and Singapore`s MSCI Taiwan index futures returns. The empirical results showed that there was fractional cointegration between the two futures markets and the volatility in Taiwan stock index futures market is about 83% of that in MSCI Taiwan Index Futures market.
參考文獻: Adadir, K.M., and A.M.R. Taylor, 1999, On the definitions of (co-)integration, Journal of Time Series Analysis 20, 129-137.\nAydogan, K. and G.. G.. Booth, 1988. Are there long cycles in common stock returns?Southern Economic Journal 55, 141-149.\nBaillie, R., and T. Bollerslev, 1989, “The message in daily exchange rates: a conditional variance tale,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 7, 297-305.\nBaillie, R.T., and T. Bollerslev, 1994a, Cointegration, fractional cointegration and exchange rate dynamics, Journal of Finance 49, 737-745.\nBaillie, R.T., and T. Bollerslev, 1994b, The long memory of the forward premium, Journal of International Money and Finance 13, 565-571.\nBaillie, R.T., T. Bollerslev, and H.O. Mikkelsen, 1996. Fractionally integrated generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 74, 3-30.\nBeine, M. S. Laurent, and C. Lecourt, 2002, “Accounting for conditional leptokurtosis and closing days effects in FIGARCH models of daily exchange rates,” Applied Financial Economics 12, 589-600.\nBlack, F., 1976. The Pricing of commodity contracts. Journal of Financial economics 3, March, 167-179.\nBollerslev, T., 1986, “Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity,” Journal of Econometrics 31, 307-27.\nBollerslev, T., 1987, “A condtitional heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return,” Review of Economics and Statistics 69, 542-547.\nBollerslev, T., and H.O. Mikkelsen, 1996,. Modelling and pricing long memory in stock market volatility, Journal of Economics 73, 151-184.\nBrunetti C., and C.L. Gilbert, 2000, Bivariate FIGARCH and fractional cointegration, Journal of Empirical Finance 7, 509-530.\nCheung, Y.W., and K. Lai, 1993, A fractional cointegration analysis of purchasing power parity, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 11, 103-112.\nDavies, R.B. and D.S. Harte, 1987. Tests for Hurst effect, Biometrika 74, 95-102.\nDing, Z., C. Granger, and R.F. Engle, 1993. A long memory property of stock market returns and a new model. Journal of Emirical Finance 1, 83-106.\nDittmann I., 2001, Fractional cointegration of voting and non-voting shares, Applied Financial Economic. 11, 321-332.\nDoornik, J.A. and M. Ooms, 2001, A package for estimating, forecasting and simulating Arfima Models: Arfima ;ackage 1.01 for Ox, (Nuffield College, Oxford, UK, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The netherlands).\nDueker, M., and R. Startz, 1998, Maximum-likelihood estimation of fractional cointegration with an application to US and Canadian bond rates, Review of Economics and Statistics 80, 420-426.\nEngle, R. F., 1983, “Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of UK inflation,” Econometrica 50, 987-1008.\nEngle, R.F., and C.W.T. Granger, 1987, Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing, Econometrica 55, 251-276.\nFeller, W., 1951. The asymptotic distribution of the range of sums of independent random variables having long range dependence. Annals of Probability 13, 428-446.\nFernandez, C., and M. Steel, 1998. On Bayesian modelling of fat tails and skewness. Journal of the American Statistical Association 93, 359-371.\nFrench, Schwert and Stambaugh, 1987. Expected Stock Returns and Volatility. Journal of Financial Economics 19, 3-30.\nGiot, P. and S. Laurent, 2003, Modelling value at risk using realized volatility and ARCH type models. (Mimeo. University of Maastricht).\nGranger, C.W.J., 1986, Developments in the study of cointegrated economic variables, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 48, 221-238.\nHosking, J.R.M., 1981. Fractional differencing. Biometrika 68, 165-176.\nHsieh, D., 1989, “Modelling Heteroskedasticity in daily foreign exchange rates,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 7, 307-317.\nHualde, J. and P.M. Robinson, 2006, Semiparametric Estimation of Fractional Cointegration, STICERD - Econometrics Paper Series /2006/502, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.\nHurst, H.E., 1951. Long-term storage capacity of reserviors. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 116, 770-799.\nJeganathan P., 1999, On asymptotic inference in cointegrated time series with fractionally integrated errors, Econometric Theory 15, 583-621.\nJohansen, S., 1988, Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, 231-254.\nJohansen, S., 1991, Estimation an hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in gaussian vector autoregressive models, Econometrica 59, 1551-1580.\nKaiser, T., 1996, “One Factor GARCH models for German Stocks-Estimation and Forecasting, Universiteit Tubingen,” working paper.\nKupiec, P.H., 1995. Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models. Journal of Derivatives 3, 73-84.\nKwiaowski, D., P.C.B. Phillips, P. Schmidt, and Y. Shin., 1992. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics 54, 159-178.\nLee, D. and P. Schmidt, 1996. On the power of the KPSS test of stationarity against fractionally integrated alternatives. Journal of Econometrics 73. \nLo, A.W., 1991. Long term memory in stock market prices. Econometrica 59,1279-1313.\nLobato, I.N. and N.E. Savin, 1998, “Real and spurious long memory properties of stock market data,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 16, 261-267.\nMandelbrot, B.B., 1972. Statistical methodology for non periodic cycles:from the covariance to R/S analysis. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 1, 259-290.\nMandelbrot, B.B., 1975. A fast fractional Gaussian noise generator. Water Resource Research 7, 543-553.\nMandelbrot, B.B. and J. Wallis, 1968. Noah, Joseph and operational hydeology. Water Resource Research 4, 909-918.\nMarinucci, D. and P.M. Robinson, 2008, Semiparametric fractional cointegration analysis, Monograph (Discussion Paper).\nMcLeod, A.I. and K.W. Hipel, 1978. Preservation of the rescaled adjusted range, 1: A reassessment of the Hurst phenomenon, Water Resources Research14, 491-508.\nNelson, D.. 1991. Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns:a new approach. Econometrica 59, 349-370.\nNewey and West, 1987, A simple, positive definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent matrix, Econometrica 55:3, 703-708.\nRobinson P.M., and J. Hualde, 2002, Cointegration in fractional systems with unknown integration orders. Preprint, LSE.\nRobinson P.M., and J. Hualde, 2003, Root-N – consistent estimation of weak fractional cointegration, Econometrica 71, 1727-1766.\nRobinson P.M., and D. Marinucci, 2001, Narrow band analysis of nonstationary processes, Annals of Statistics 29, 947-986.\nRobinson P.M. and Y. Yajima, 2001, Determination of cointegrating rank in fractional systems. Suntory and Toyota International Centre for Economics and Related Disciplines. London School of Economics EM/01/423.\nTse, Y. K., 1998, “The conditional heteroskedasticity of the Yen-Dollar exchange rate,” Journal of Applied Econometrics 13, 49-55.
描述: 博士
國立政治大學
經濟學系
90258508
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090258508
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.