Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94919| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 賴景昌 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Lai, Ching Chong | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | 楊馥菁 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | 楊馥菁 | zh_TW |
| dc.date | 2008 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-09T05:27:30Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-05-09T05:27:30Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-05-09T05:27:30Z | - |
| dc.identifier | G0095258010 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94919 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 經濟學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 95258010 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著知識經濟的崛起以及許多社會現象與研究文獻的證實，人力資本對一國的經濟成長而言，已是不可或缺的動力；因此，本文沿用Barro (1990)模型，將人力資本要素引進生產函數，並設定政府部門對私部門的人力資本投資有特定比例的補貼，據此探討加入人力資本要素後，Barro (1990)模型是否有不同的結果？而人力資本與其補貼對於經濟成長的影響又為何？\r\n\r\n 本文分析的結果發現，租稅政策對經濟體系的影響大致與Barro (1990)模型的結論相同，分別為：一、所得稅率的變動，為經濟成長率帶來的影響仍是不確定的；二、在給定特定的人力資本補貼率，如果政府所課徵的所得稅率能夠達成經濟成長率的極大，就能夠使社會福利水準達到極大。但與Barro (1990)不同的是，因為本模型的體系中存在著人力資本的補貼，因此在極大化經濟成長率的水準下，所得稅率會較Barro (1990)模型下的所得稅率大。\r\n\r\n 此外，由於人力資本與補貼的加入，使得本文有所突破之處：一、和一般認知不同的是，政府對於人力資本投資的補貼增加，在其他條件不變下，使得對於經濟成長率的影響並非正向，而是不確定的。二、給定特定的所得稅率，當政府決定的人力資本補貼率能使經濟成長達極大時，亦會使社會福利水準達到極大。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 序言 1\r\n第一節 研究動機與目的 1\r\n第二節 文獻回顧 3\r\n第三節 本文架構 8\r\n第二章 理論模型 9\r\n第一節 模型設定 10\r\n第二節 最適化行為決策 13\r\n第三章 動態調整分析 17\r\n第一節 體系動態特質 17\r\n第二節 人力資本投資補貼率增加的比較靜態 26\r\n第三節 社會福利分析 31\r\n第四章 結論 37\r\n附錄 39\r\n參考文獻 44 | zh_TW |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095258010 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 公共基礎建設 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 人力資本 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 內生成長 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 補貼 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Public Infrastructure | en_US |
| dc.subject | Human Capital | en_US |
| dc.subject | Endogenous Growth | en_US |
| dc.subject | Subsidy | en_US |
| dc.title | 公共基礎建設、人力資本與內生成長 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Public Infrastructure, Human Capital, and Endogenous Growth | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | 一、中文部份\r\n李信興 (2006)，《人力資本存量與經濟成長之關係》，臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所碩士論文。\r\n陳明郎 (1999)，《經濟成長》，台北，華泰。\r\n賴景昌 (2004)，《總體經濟學》，第二版。台北，雙葉。\r\n賴景昌 (2006)，《內生成長理論》，輔仁大學上課講義。\r\n賴景昌 (2007)，《如何建構內生成長模型》，輔仁大學上課講義。\r\n\r\n二、英文部份\r\nAgénor, P. R. (2005), “Infrastructure, Public Education and Growth with Congestion Costs,” Working Paper NO. 47, Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research,\r\nUniversity of Manchester.\r\nAlonso-Carrera, J. (2000), “The Subsidy to Human Capital Accumulation in an Endogenous Growth Model: A Comparative Dynamics Analysis,” Journal of \r\nMacroeconomics 22: 409-431.\r\nBarro, R. J. (1990), “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous\r\n Growth,” Journal of Political Economy 98: S103-125.\r\nBarro, R. J. (1991), “Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries,” Quarterly\r\nJournal of Economy 106: 407-443.\r\nBarro, R. J. and Lee, J. W. (1993), “International Comparisons of Educational\r\nAttainment,” Journal of Monetary Economy 32: 363-394.\r\nBarro, R. (2001), “Human Capital and Growth,” American Economic Review, 91: \r\n12–17.\r\n\r\nBarro, R. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004), Economic Growth, 2nd Edition. Mass.,\r\nCambridge: The MIT Press.\r\nBecker, G. S., Murphy, K. M., and Tamura, R. (1990), “Human Capital, Fertility, and\r\nEconomic Growth,” Journal of Political Economy 98: S12-37\r\nCaballé, J. (1995), “Endogenous Growth, Human Capital, and Bequests in a Life-\r\nCycle Model,” Oxford Economic Papers 47: 156-181.\r\nCass, D. (1965), “Optimal Growth in an Aggregate Model of Capital Accumulation,” \r\nReview of Economic Studies 32: 229-243.\r\nDomar, E. D. (1947), “Expansion and Employment,” American Economic Review 67: 137-147.\r\nFutagami, K., Morita, Y. and Shibata, A. (1993), “Dynamic Analysis of an Endogenous Growth Model with Public Capital,” Scandinavian Journal of\r\nEconomic 95: 607-625.\r\nHanushek, E. A., and Kimko, D. D.(2000), “Schooling, Labor-Force Quality, and the\r\nGrowth of Nations,” American Economic Review 90: 1184-1208.\r\nHarrod, R. F. (1939), “An Essay in Dynamic Theory,” Economic Journal 49: 14-33.\r\nKoopmans, T. C. (1965), “On the Concept of Optimal Economic Growth,” in Koopmans, T. C. ed., The Econometric Approach to Development Planning.\r\nAmsterdam: North-Hollan.\r\nLucas, R. (1988), “On the Mechanics of Economic Development,” Journal of\r\nMonetary Economic 23: 3-42.\r\nLin, T. C. (2003), “Education, Technical Progress, and Economic Growth: The Case \r\nof Taiwan,” Economics of Education Review 22: 213-220.\r\nMankiw, N. G., Romer, D., and Weil, D. N. (1992), “A Contribution to the Empirics \r\nof Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 407-437.\r\n\r\nMincer, J. (1984), “Human Capital and Economic Growth,” Economics of Education\r\nReview 3: 195-205.\r\nRebelo, S. T. (1991), “Long Run Policy Analysis and Long Run Growth,” Journal of\r\nPolitical Economy 99: 500-521.\r\nRomer, P. M. (1986), “Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth,” Journal of\r\nPolitical Economy 94: 1002-1037.\r\nRomer, P. M. (1990), “Endogenous Technological Change,” Journal of Political\r\nEconomy 98: S71-102.\r\nSchultz, T. W. (1961), “Investment in Human Capital,” American Economic Review \r\n51: 1-17.\r\nSolow, R. M. (1956), “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth,” Quarterly \r\nJournal of Economics 70: 65-94.\r\nSwan, T. W. (1956), “Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation,” Economics \r\nRecord 32: 334-361.\r\nUzawa, H. (1964), “Optimal Growth in a Two-Sector Model of Capital \r\nAccumulation ?” Review of Economic Studies 31: 1-24. | zh_TW |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html | 115 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.