Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95005
題名: 台灣國中學生英語字彙學習策略偏好個案研究
A case study on english learner’s preferences lies in vocabulary learning strategies used by some junior high school students in Taiwan
作者: 簡鈺珊
Chien, Yu Shan
貢獻者: 黃麗儀
Huang, Li Yi
簡鈺珊
Chien, Yu Shan
關鍵詞: 單字學習策略
英語單字教學
英語單字學習
vocabulary learning strategies
English vocabulary teaching
English vocabulary learning
日期: 2009
上傳時間: 9-May-2016
摘要: 本研究基於字彙學習以及字彙學習策略的重要性,探討台灣國中學生使用字彙學習策略的情形。且加入其在字彙學習程度高低的因素,來探討台灣國中學生使用策略之情形。本研究問題有二:第一,台灣國中學生最常使用的字彙學習策略有哪些?最不常使用的字彙學習策略有哪些?第二,台灣國中學生字彙學習程度與字彙學習策略之間是否有關聯性?如果有,其關聯性又為何?本研究依據Oxford(1990)的語言學習策略分類標準,測驗某台北市立國中二年級的學生使用字彙學習策略的情形,同時也比較字彙學習程度不同的學生使用這些策略的頻率高低。結果顯示如下:(1)台灣國中學生最常使用的字彙學習策略為認知策略,最少使用的字彙學習策略為情意策略。(2)程度高的學生使用字彙學習策略的頻率高於程度低的學生。此研究結果可為英語教師和學習者在字彙教與學方面提供一些參考,讓英語字彙的教學變得更加有效率。
The study investigates the usage of English vocabulary learning strategies by some junior high school students in Taiwan. The factor of the levels of the students is included. There are two research questions: (1) what are the most commonly used English vocabulary learning strategies among junior high school students in Taiwan? (2) whether the levels of the students are related to the types of vocabulary learning strategies they use? If the answer is “yes”, what relationship it is? The study is based on the language learning strategies in Oxford(1990). The subjects are some second graders in a junior high school in Taipei. In the study, the researcher compares the usage of English vocabulary learning strategies among students at different vocabulary levels. The result shows that the most commonly used vocabulary strategy among the students is cognitive strategy, and the least commonly used one is affective strategy. Furthermore, the result also shows that higher level students use vocabulary learning strategies more often than lower level students. The researcher hopes that this study could give the English learners some suggestions to make vocabulary learning more effective.
參考文獻: 中文部分\r\n林芝寧(2004)關鍵字學習策略:對台灣高中生英語字彙學習成效之研究。高雄,\r\n台灣:國立高雄師範大學英語學系碩士論文\r\n呂敏娟(2002)台灣國中生英語字彙學習策略訓練效益之研究。台北,台灣:國\r\n立師範大學英語研究所碩士論文\r\n簡玉卿(2005)國小五年級學童英語單字學習策略教學成效之探討。台北,台\r\n灣:國立台北教育大學兒童英語教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n張靜怡(2006)台灣大學生英語字彙學習策略使用之研究。台南,台灣:私立立\r\n德大學外國語文研究所英語教學組碩士論文\r\n鄭孟淳(2005)台灣國中學生英語字彙學習策略之研究。台北,台灣:國立政治\r\n大學語言所碩士論文。\r\n施秀香(2004)台灣國高中生單字學習策略及其成效之研究。高雄,台灣:國\r\n立高雄師範大學英語研究所碩士論文。\r\n王玉華(2003)台灣高中學生英語字彙學習策略之探討。台北,台灣:國立政治\r\n大學英語教學碩士在職專班碩士論文\r\n安詩潔(2005)國小六年級學生英語學習策略之研究。嘉義,台灣:國立嘉義大\r\n學國民教育研究所碩士論文\r\n\r\n英文部分\r\nAnderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), \r\nComprehension and teaching: Research reviews (p.77-177). Newark, DE: \r\nInternational Reading Association. \r\nDecarrico, J.S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In M, Celce-Murcia (Ed.), \r\nTeaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publisher.\r\nFan, M. Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of \r\nsecond language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. The modern language journal, 87 (2), 222-241.\r\nGu, Y. & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning \r\noutcomes. Language Learning, 46, p.643-679.\r\nGui, S. (1985). A survey analysis of the English majors’ vocabulary size in China. \r\nModern Foreign Languages, 27(1), p.1-6. \r\nHosenfeld, C. (1979). A learning-teaching view of second language instruction. \r\nForeign language annuals, 12, 51-57.\r\nLaufer, B. (1991). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In P. J. L. \r\nArnaud & H. Bejoint (Eds). Vocabulary and applied linguistics (p.126-132) \r\nMcCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University press.\r\nMeara, P. & Jones, G. (1987). Tests of vocabulary size in English as a foreign \r\nlanguage. Potyglot, 8(1), p.1-40 \r\nNaiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H. H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language \r\nlearner. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, The Modern \r\nLanguage Center. \r\nNation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. New York: Newburry \r\nHouse \r\nNation, I. S. P. (1993b). Vocabulary size, growth, and use. In R. Schreuder & B. \r\nWeltens (Eds.), The bilingual lexicon. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John \r\nBenjamins \r\nOu, H. C. (1997). A study of university freshmen’s English reading proficiency and \r\nlearning strategies. Proceedings of the fourteenth conference on English teaching \r\nand learning in the Republic of China. Taipei: Crane Publishing Co. \r\nOxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. \r\nBoston, MA: Heinle & Heinle publisher. \r\nOxford, R. L., Park-Oh., Ito, S., & Sumrall, M. (1993). Learning Japanese by satellite: \r\nWhat Japanese by satellite: What influences student achievement? System, 21(1), \r\np.31-48.\r\nPimsleur, P. (1967). A memory schedule. Modern Language Journal, 51 (2), 73-75.\r\nRubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, \r\n9(1), 41-51.\r\nSchmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt, & M. McCarthy \r\n(Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge: \r\nCambridge University Press.\r\nShen, W. W. (2001). The vocabulary learning strategies of Chinese and British \r\nuniversity students, with an analysis of approaches to selected cultural keywords. \r\nPh. D. dissertation, University of Leicester. \r\nStern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? The\r\nCanadian modern language review, 31, 304-318.\r\nThomas, M. H., & Dieter, J. N. (1987). The positive effects of writing practice on \r\nintegration of foreign words in memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, \r\np.249-253\r\nWilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching (p. 111). London: Edward \r\nArnold.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
語言學研究所
92555004
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0925550041
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.