Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95160| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李有仁 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 林俊成 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | 林俊成 | zh_TW |
| dc.date | 2009 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-09T07:18:04Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-05-09T07:18:04Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-05-09T07:18:04Z | - |
| dc.identifier | G0096356007 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95160 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 資訊管理學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 96356007 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討Web2.0時代下社群網站的服務品質要素，以剛進入國內的世界最大社群網站「Facebook」為研究對象。以焦點團體訪談（Focus group）方式，輔以文獻支持，針對Facebook的使用者做深度訪談，探索使用者所在意的社群網站服務品質要素。訪談結果共整理出24個B2C，及12個C2C等共36個社群網站服務品質要素。再將36個服務品質要素結合Kano模式，探討每個要素的二維品質特性。同時 加入涉入程度、網站社交強度及使用者經驗為調解變數，探討不同涉入程度、網站社交強度及使用者經驗下，服務品質要素的二維品質分類特性。研究結果歸類出4個魅力品質、8個一維品質、16個必須品質及8個無差異品質。另外在不同涉入程度、網站社交程度及使用者經驗下，對於網站服務品質的二維品質皆有不同的分類。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究背景與動機 1\n第二節 研究目的 3\n第三節 研究方法 5\n第四節 研究流程 6\n第二章 文獻回顧 7\n第一節 WEB2.0 7\n第二節 網站服務品質 12\n第三節 虛擬社群 20\n第四節 二維品質模式 23\n第五節 涉入程度 33\n第六節 關係強度(RELATIONSHIP STRENGTH) 35\n第七節 使用者經驗 36\n第八節 小結 38\n第三章 研究設計與方法 39\n第一節 WEB2.0 社群網站服務品質要素探索 39\n第二節 研究架構 48\n第三節 構面操作型定義 49\n第四節 問卷設計 50\n第五節 資料蒐集方法 58\n第六節 資料分析方法與工具 58\n第四章 研究結果 60\n第一節 前測分析結果 60\n第二節 信度分析 65\n第三節 WEB2.0社群網站服務品質評比 66\n第四節 KANO二維品質要素歸類 67\n第五節 品質改善指標 78\n第五章 結論 94\n第一節 結論 94\n第二節 管理意涵 96\n第三節 理論貢獻 99\n第四節 研究範圍與限制 100\n第五節 未來研究建議 101\n\n圖1本研究之研究流程 6\n表2.1 Web2.0與Web1.0應用比較 7\n圖2.1 Web2.0概念地圖 9\n表2.2、Web2.0 4C特色 10\n表2.3 PZB服務品質構面（1985） 14\n表2.4 PZB服務品質構面（1988） 14\n表2.5 網站服務品質維度相關文獻 18\n圖2.2 雙因子理論示意圖 23\n表2.6二維品質模式相關文獻 28\n表2.7 Kano, et al. (1984)品質要素歸類表 30\n表2.8 Schvaneveldt, et al. (1991)品質要素歸類表 31\n表2.9 Berger, et al. (1993)品質要素歸類表 31\n表2.10 Matzler & Hinterhuber (1998)品質要素歸類表 32\n表3.1 本研究焦點訪談受訪者分組標準化資料 40\n表3.2 本研究焦點訪談受訪者資料 41\n表3.3 焦點團體訪談問題大綱與回答摘要 42\n表3.4 B2C服務品質要素 44\n表3.5 C2C服務品質要素 46\n表3.6 本研究構面操作型定義 49\n表3.7 B2C服務品質變數前測衡量問項 50\n表3.8 C2C服務品質前測衡量問項 51\n表3.9涉入程度衡量問項 52\n表3.10 網站使用經驗衡量問項 53\n表3.11 網站使用經驗衡量問項 53\n表3.12 Matzler & Hinterhuber (1998)品質要素歸類表 54\n表3.13 B2C服務品質構面衡量問項 54\n表3.14 C2C服務品質構面衡量問項 57\n表4.1 前測問卷樣本資料結構 60\n表4.2 B2C服務品質因素 62\n表4.3 C2C服務品質因素 63\n表4.4 B2C服務品質問項辨別力分析 63\n表4.5 C2C服務品質問項辨別力分析 64\n表4.6 前測信度分析結果 65\n表4.7 各網站品質服務評比 66\n表4.8 正式問卷樣本資料結構 68\n表4.9 Kano分類結果二 (全體樣本) 71\n表4.10 Kano分類結果二 (全體樣本) 72\n表4.11 樣本依調節變數標準化後分類結構 73\n表4.12 Kano分類結果 (依調節變數分類) 76\n表4.13 品質改善指標象限表 (全體樣本) 79\n表4.14 滿意度改善指標 (全體樣本) 80\n表4.15 品質改善指標象限表 (低涉入程度) 81\n表4.16 滿意度改善指標 (低涉入程度) 82\n表4.17 品質改善指標象限表 (高涉入程度) 83\n表4.18 滿意度改善指標 (高涉入程度) 84\n表4.19 品質改善指標象限表 (低社交強度) 85\n表4.20 滿意度改善指標 (低社交強度) 86\n表4.21 品質改善指標象限表 (高社交強度) 87\n表4.22滿意度改善指標 (高社交強度) 88\n表4.23 品質改善指標象限表 (一般使用者) 89\n表4.24滿意度改善指標 (一般使用者) 90\n表4.25 品質改善指標象限表 (重度使用者) 91\n表4.26滿意度改善指標 (重度使用者) 92 | zh_TW |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096356007 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 二維品質模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 網站服務品質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社群網站 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Web 2.0 | en_US |
| dc.title | Web2.0社群網站服務品質之研究 -以Kano二維品質模式觀點 | zh_TW |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | Adler, R. P., & Christopher, A. J. (1998). Internet community primer: Overview and business opportunities. Internet Community Primer1998.\n[2] Barnes, J. (1997). Closeness, strength, and satisfaction: examining the nature of relationships between providers of financial services and their retail customers. Psychology and Marketing, 14(8).\n[3] Barnes, S. J., & Vidgen, R. T. (2002). An integrative approach to the assessment of e-commerce quality. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 3(3), 114-127.\n[4] Beatty, S., Mayer, M., Coleman, J., Reynolds, K., & Lee, J. (1996). Customer-sales associate retail relationships. Journal of Retailing, 72(3), 223-247.\n[5] Berger, C., Blauth, R., Boger, D., Bolster, C., Burchill, G., DuMouchel, W., et al. (1993). Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality. Center for Quality Management Journal, 4, 3-36.\n[6] Charla, M., Caroline, W., & Ko de, R. (2008). Social Capital Production in a Virtual P3 Community. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 832.\n[7] Collier, J. E., & Bienstock, C. C. (2006). Measuring Service Quality in E-Retailing. Journal of Service Research, 8(3), 260.\n[8] Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.\n[9] Cusumano, M., Kahl, S., & Suarez, F. F. (2006). Product, Process, and Service: A New Industry Lifecycle Model: MIT Sloan School of Management, mimeo.\n[10] Etzioni, A., & Etzioni, O. (1999). Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communities, A Comparative Analysis. The Information Society, 15(4), 241-248.\n[11] Forlizzi, J., & Ford, S. (2000). The building blocks of experience: an early framework for interaction designers.\n[12] Gronroos, C. (1984). A Service Quality Model and its Marketing Implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4).\n[13] Gupta, S., & Kim, H. W. (2007). The Moderating Effect of Transaction Experience on the Decision Calculus in On-Line Repurchase. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 12(1), 127-158.\n[14] Hagel, J., & Armstrong, A. (1997). Net Gain: Expanding Markets Through Virtual Communities: Harvard Business School Press.\n[15] Halinen, A. (1996). Service quality in professional business services: a relationship approach. Advances in services marketing and management, 5, 315-341.\n[16] Hampton, K. N., & Wellman, B. (2000). Examining Community in the Digital Neighborhood: Early Results from Canada`s Wired Suburb. LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 194-208.\n[17] Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How Do You Motivate Employees?, erschienen in. Harvard Business Review, 46, 87-96.\n[18] Hinchcliffe, D. (2006). Review of the year`s best Web 2.0 explanations, from http://web2.wsj2.com/review_of_the_years_best_web_20_explanations.htm \n[19] Houston, M., & Rothschild, M. (1978). Conceptual and methodological perspectives on involvement. Research frontiers in marketing: Dialogues and directions, 184-187.\n[20] Jan Marco, L., Pascal, S., & Helmut, K. (Writer) (2006). Exploring Success Factors of Virtual Communities: The Perspectives of Members and Operators.\n[21] Janda, S., Trocchia, P. J., & Gwinner, K. P. (2002). Consumer perceptions of Internet retail service quality. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 13(5), 412-431.\n[22] Judd Robert, C. (1964). The Case for Redefining Services? Journal of Marketing, 28, 59.\n[23] Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., & Tsuji, S. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control, 14(2), 39-48.\n[24] Kapferer, J., & Laurent, G. (1985). Consumer involvement profiles: a new practical approach to consumer involvement. Journal of Advertising Research, 25(6), 48-56.\n[25] Karahanna, E., Straub, D., & Chervany, N. (1999). Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 23(1), 14.\n[26] Kay, C. T., & Theresia, A. P. (2001). Integrating SERVQUAL and Kano`s model into QFD for service excellence development. Managing Service Quality, 11(6), 418.\n[27] Kotler, P. (1988). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control: Prentice Hall.\n[28] Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (1996). Principles of Marketing.\n[29] Kotler, P., & Bliemel, F. (2000). Marketing Management. Englewood Cliffs.\n[30] Kristine de, V., Fred, L., Peter, C. V., & Peeter, W. J. V. (Writer) (2007). Satisfaction with Virtual Communities of Interest: Effect on Members` Visit Frequency*.\n[31] Krugman, H. (1965). The impact of television advertising: Learning without involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29(3), 349-356.\n[32] Kuniavsky, M. (2003). Observing the user experience: a practitioner`s guide to user research: Morgan Kaufmann.\n[33] LANGERAK, F., VERHOEF, P., VERLEGH, P., & DE VALCK, K. (2004). The Effect of Members` Satisfaction with a Virtual Community on Member Participation.\n[34] Langerak, F., Verhoef, P., Verlegh, P., De Valck, K., Dholakia, U., & Bagozzi, R. (2004). The Effect of Members` Satisfaction with a Virtual Community on Member Participation.\n[35] Liff, A. (1998). Fostering Online Collaboration and Community. ASSOCIATION MANAGEMENT-WASHINGTON-, 50, 33-39.\n[36] Liljander, V., & Strandvik, T. (1995). The nature of customer relationships in services. Advances in services marketing and management, 4, 141-167.\n[37] Liu, C., & Arnett, K. P. (2000). Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Information & Management, 38(1), 23-33.\n[38] Loiacono, E. T., Watson, R. T., & Goodhue, D. L. (2000). WebQual: a measure of Web site quality. Marketing Theory and Applications, 13, 37-64.\n[39] Mattila, A., & Wirtz, J. (2004). Consumer complaining to firms: the determinants of channel choice. JOURNAL OF SERVICES MARKETING, 18, 147-155.\n[40] Matzler, K., & Hinterhuber, H. H. (1998). How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano`s model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation, 18(1), 25.\n[41] Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1978). Psychometric theory: McGraw-Hill New York.\n[42] O`Reilly, T. (2005). from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html?page=1\n[43] Parasuraman, A. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing (pre-1986), 49(000004), 41.\n[44] Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Marketing: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, 64(1), 12-40.\n[45] Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). ES-QUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213.\n[46] René, A., & Calin, G. (2008). Introducing structuration theory in communal consumption behavior research. Qualitative Market Research, 11(2), 227.\n[47] Robinson, J., Shaver, P., & Wrightsman, L. (1991). Criteria for scale selection and evaluation. Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes, 1, 1–16.\n[48] Schvaneveldt, S. J., Enkawa, T., & Miyakawa, M. (1991). Consumer evaluation perspectives of service quality: evaluation factors and two-way model of quality. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2(2), 149-162.\n[49] Sherif, M., & Cantril, H. (1947). The psychology of ego-involvements: Social attitudes & identifications: Wiley New York.\n[50] Szymanski, D. M., & Hise, R. T. (2000). E-satisfaction: an initial examination. Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 309-322.\n[51] Tapscott, D., Lowy, A., & Ticoll, D. (1998). Blueprint to the Digital Economy: Creating Wealth in the Era of E-Business: McGraw-Hill Professional.\n[52] Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 19(1), 25.\n[53] Thomas, J., Nelson, J., & Silverman, S. (2005). Research methods in physical activity: Human Kinetics.\n[54] Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1994). Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: testing a conceptual model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(1), 167-187.\n[55] Thorsten, G., Alexander, R., Isabelle, S., & Roediger, V. (2008). Revealing the expectations and preferences of complaining customers by combining the laddering interviewing technique with the Kano model of customer satisfaction. Qualitative Market Research, 11(4), 400.\n[56] Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 186-204.\n[57] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). USER ACCEPTANCE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: TOWARD A UNIFIED VIEW. Mis Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.\n[58] Wolfinbarger, M., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). eTailQ: dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting etail quality. Journal of Retailing, 79(3), 183-198.\n[59] Yang, Z., Peterson, R. T., & Huang, L. (2001). Taking the pulse of Internet pharmacies. Mark Health Serv, 21(2), 4-10.\n[60] Ying-Feng, K. (2004). Integrating Kano`s Model into Web-community Service Quality. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 15(7), 925-939.\n[61] Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing a Scale to Measure the Perceived Quality of an Internet Shopping Site (SITEQUAL). QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, 2, 31-46.\n[62] Zaichkowsky, J. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341.\n[63] Zaichkowsky, J. (1994). The personal involvement inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 59-70.\n[64] Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.\n[65] Zeithaml, V. A., & Bitner, M. J. (2000). Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.\n[66] Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). Problems and strategies in services marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(2), 33-46.\n[67] Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Malhotra, A. (2002). Service quality delivery through web sites: A critical review of extant knowledge. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 362-375.\n[68] Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., Malhotra, A., & Marketing Science, I. (2000). A conceptual framework for understanding e-service quality: implications for future research and managerial practice: Marketing Science Institute.\n[69] 石川馨 (1975). 品質解析 第一講, . 品質管理, 24(1), 70-82.\n[70] 朱文嘉 (2005). 運用區別分析判定二維品質模式之屬性分類—以連鎖便利商店為例. 中華大學.\n[71] 吳成斌 (1998). 品質屬性之重要度與滿意度之研究-以東元電機股份有限公司為案例分析. 中原大學.\n[72] 吳齊殷 (1998). 虛擬社區的 [生活經驗] 對個人真實生活的影響: 社會學研究的新領域. 論文發表於中央研究院社會研究所主辦之 「1998 年網路新紀元展覽暨研討會」, 臺北.\n[73] 李有仁, 張., 林俊成 (2009). 影音分享網站使用者意圖之研究.\n[74] 李蕙君 (2006). 以Kano模式探討台灣高鐵等待服務品質. 朝陽科技大學.\n[75] 曹承礎 (2007). Web2.0開拓新桃花源. 數位時代, 392, p22-23.\n[76] 梅田望夫 (2006). 網路巨變元年：你必須參與的大未來 (蔡昭儀譯, Trans.): 先覺出版社.\n[77] 許慧娟 (1995). 二維品質模式在服務品質上之應用─ 銀行存款之實證研究. 未出版碩士論文, 國立台灣大學商學研究所, 台北.\n[78] 郭宜中 (2000). 以Kano模式探討醫院服務品質與病患滿意度之研究. 元智大學.\n[79] 創市際市場研究顧問公司 (2003). 台灣九月份700萬網友曾造訪社群網站, from http://www.nici.nat.gov.tw/content/application/nici/generala/guest-cnt-browse.php?cntgrp_ordinal=1002006100110005&cnt_id=816\n[80] 楊錦洲 (1993). 二維品質模式在服務品質上之應用. 品質管制月刊, 29(5), 27-33.\n[81] 資策會 (2006). Web2.0 創新應用案例集：科技化服務新趨勢: 財團法人資訊工業策進會.\n[82] 賴順振 (2000). 顧客導向品質手法之評析-以選課作業為例. 中原大學. | zh_TW |
| item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
| item.grantfulltext | none | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.