Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96447| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 方聖平 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳璧純 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | 吳璧純 | zh_TW |
| dc.date | 1987 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-11 | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-05-11 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-05-11 | - |
| dc.identifier | G91NCCU9772012 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96447 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 教育學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 提要?容 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄\r\n論文提要\r\n目錄\r\n圖表目錄\r\n第一章 緒論\r\n第一節 研究動機與目的………1\r\n第二節 重要名詞釋義………7\r\n第三節 研究限制………10\r\n第二章 文獻探討\r\n第一節 字詞辨識的基本單位與概念區辨性………11\r\n一、 傳統有關字詞辨識基本單位的理論………11\r\n二、 概念區辨性………14\r\n第二節 錯覺組合與字母遷移現象………17\r\n第三節 中文字的自行特色和中文字的錯覺組合現象………19\r\n第三章 以中文字的錯覺組合現象探討基本表徵的形成因素\r\n第一節 實驗一………21\r\n方法………21\r\n結果………24\r\n第二節 實驗二………25\r\n方法………25\r\n結果………27\r\n第三節 討論－概念區辨性與基本表徵………29\r\n第四章 中文字錯覺組合現象本質之探討\r\n第一節 實驗三………33\r\n方法………33\r\n結果………35\r\n第二節 實驗四………37\r\n方法………37\r\n結果………39\r\n第三節 實驗五………40\r\n方法………40\r\n結果………42\r\n第四節 討論－中文字的錯覺組合現象不但發生在視知覺初期，也會發生在較高的語文認知層次………44\r\n一、 中文字的錯覺組合現象是視知覺初期的產物………44\r\n二、 較高認知層次的認知因素也會造成中文字的錯覺組合現象………45\r\n第五章 結論與建議\r\n第一節 在字詞辨識模式上的涵義………47\r\n第二節 對應用研究方面的啟示………48\r\n第三節 對未來研究的建議………49\r\n參考書目\r\n中文部份………51\r\n西文部份………53\r\n附錄一 實驗一所使用材料字組………59\r\n附錄二 實驗二所使用材料字組………61\r\n附錄三 實驗三可能產生錯覺組合字組及其出現頻率………63\r\n附錄四 實驗四所使用材料字組………65\r\n附錄五 實驗五所使用材料字組………66\r\n\r\n\r\n圖表目錄\r\n圖2-1：中文字筆劃的基本特徵………11\r\n表3-1：實驗一的六種材料字組………22\r\n表3-2：實驗一中六種字群組在四種反應型態上的平均反應百分比………24\r\n表3-3：實驗二的十二種材料字組………26\r\n表3-4：實驗二的十二種字對組在四種反應型態上的平均反應百分比………28\r\n表4-1：實驗三的十種材料字組………34\r\n表4-2：實驗三中十種字對祖在四種反應型態上的平均反應百分比………36\r\n表4-3：實驗四的五種材料字組………38\r\n表4-4：實驗四中五種字對組在四種反應型態上的平均反應百分比………39\r\n表4-5：實驗五中四種字群組在答對率、準錯覺組合率以及其他錯誤率上的百分比………42\r\n表4-6：實驗五中三種字群組的準錯覺組合率和錯覺組合率………43 | zh_TW |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G91NCCU9772012 | en_US |
| dc.title | 中文字的錯覺組合現象 : 概念區辨性.詞彙性以及字.詞義相關性影響之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | 參考書目\r\n一、中文部份\r\n方聖平、梅廣等（民 74），中文字形輸入法之分析與評估模式之建立。中華心理學刊，27卷1期，頁27-41。\r\n艾偉（民54a），國語問題。台北：中華書局，台三版。\r\n艾偉（民54b），漢字問題。台北：中華書局，台二版。\r\n艾偉（民68），中學國文教學心理學。台北：中華書局，台三版。\r\n林尹（民60），文字學概說。台北：正中書局。\r\n林宜平（民72），漢字「形」、「音」、「義」的比對：一個「語音轉錄」的字彙接觸模式。國立台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文。\r\n高尚仁（民70），中國語文的心理與研究。載於高尚仁、鄭昭明合編中國語文的心理學研究。台北：文鶴出版社，頁1-47。\r\n唐蘭（民67），中國文字學。台北：文光圖書公司。\r\n連韻文（民75），中文唸字歷程的探討：聲旁語音觸發作用。國立台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文。\r\n郭為藩（民67），我國學童閱讀缺陷問題初步調查及其檢討。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，20輯，頁57-78。\r\n陳嘉鳳、鄭昭明（民65），速讀訓練對閱讀速度、語文理解及檢字的效果。中華心理學刊，18.卷，頁61-66。\r\n陳烜之（民73），閱讀中文時對部件偵測的歷程。中華心理學刊，26卷1期，\r\n頁29-34。\r\n國立編譯館主編（民65），國民學校常用字彙研究。台北：中華書局。\r\n曾志朗（民70），論文字組合在閱讀歷程及認知能力間的關係：兼論中文閱讀研究在當代認知科學上的地位。載於高尚仁、鄭昭明合編中國語文的心理學研究。台北：文鶴出版社，頁85-101。\r\n張欣戊（民70），認字的心理過程。載於國立彰化教育學院編印教育論叢，頁355-374。\r\n黃宣範（民72），語言哲學－意義與指涉理論研究。台北：文鶴出版社。\r\n黃作宏（民69），世界最新分類拼音文字研究。台北：自發行。\r\n湯廷池（民69），一個外行人對小學國語教學的看法（上）。台灣教育月刊，358卷，10期，頁55-59。\r\n鄭昭明（民67），漢字記憶的語言轉錄與字的回億。中華心理學刊20卷，頁39-43。\r\n鄭昭明（民67），漢字的特性及其機械化的可能方向。中華心理學刊，20卷，頁19-27。\r\n鄭昭明（民70），漢字認知的歷程。載於高尚仁、鄭昭明合編中國語文的心理學研究。台北：文鶴出版社，頁135-172。\r\n鄭昭明（民75），從認知心理學看華文的學習。華文世界，40卷4期，頁4-12。\r\n劉英茂、陳家麟（民69），國語拼音法和閱讀效率的關係。中華心理學刊，22卷1期，頁23-28。\r\n劉英茂、莊仲仁（1970），一千二百個本國文字有意義度之評定（上）。國立台灣大學理學院心理學系報告，12卷，頁33-51。\r\n劉英茂、莊仲仁（1971），一千二百個本國文字有意義度之評定（下）。國立台灣大學理學院心理學系報告，13卷，頁75-190。\r\n劉誠、何曉飛（民69），中文橫寫的向左向右－從閱讀準確性與速度來比較。中華心理學刊，22卷1期，頁29-31。\r\n聯合報（民74），我國兒童無閱讀障礙？ 10月13日。\r\n謝娜敏（民71），中文「字」與「詞」的閱讀與語音轉錄。國立台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文。\r\n蘇淑貞、宋維村、徐澄清（民73），中國閱讀障礙學童之類型及智力測驗。中華心理學刊，26卷1期，頁41-48。\r\n\r\n\r\n二、西文部份\r\nAllport, D. A. (1977). On knowing the meaning of words we are unable to report: The effects of visual masking. In S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and Performance VI. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.\r\nBroadbent, D.E. (1967). Word frequency effect and response bias. Psychological Review, 74, 1-15.\r\nCatell, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63-65.\r\nChen, H.C. (1986). Component detection in reading Chinese characters. In H. S. R. Kao & R. Hoosa in (Eds.), Linguistics, Psychology, and the Chinese Language. Hong Kong: The Uni. of Hong Kong.\r\nChomsky, N. & Hall, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.\r\nColtheart, M. (1980). Deep dyslexia: A review of the syndrome. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep Dyslexia, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.\r\nCrowder, R. C. (1982). The Psychology of Reading. New York: Macmillan publishing Co., Inc.\r\nEstes, W. K. (1975). The locus of inferential and perceptual processess in letter identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 122-145.\r\nFang, S.P. & Horng, R.Y. (1986). The consistency effects in the Chinese character and pseudo-character naming tasks. In H.S. R. Kao & R. Hoosa in (Eds.), Linguistics, Psychology, and the Chinese Language. Hong Kong: The Uni. of Hong Kong.\r\nFang, S.P. (1987). Effects of perceptual and conceptual distinctiveness on the separability of Chinese characters. Manuscript submitted for publication.\r\nGarner, W.R. (1974). The Processing of information and structure. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.\r\nGarner, W.R. (1978). Selective attention to attributes and to stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107,287-308.\r\nGarner, W.R. (1981). The analyzed of unanalyzed perceptions. In M. Kubovy & J.R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual Organization. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.\r\nGibson, E.J. (1969). Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.\r\nGibson, E. J. (1971). Perceptual learning and the theory of word perception. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 351-368.\r\nGibson, E. J. & Levin, H. (1980). Psychology of Reading. U.S.A.: MIT Prs.\r\nGibson, E. J., Shurcliff, A. & Jonas, A. (1970). Utilization of spelling patterns by deaf and hearing subjects. In H. Levin and J. P. Williams (Eds.) Basic Studies on Reading. N. Y.: Basic Books.\r\nGough, P. B. (1972). On second of reading. In J. F. Kavangh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.) Language by Ear and by Eye. Mass: MIT Press.\r\nHealy, A. F. (1976). Detection errors on the word `the`: Evidence for reading units larger than letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 235-242.\r\nHealy, A.F. (1980). Proofreading errors on the word `the`: New evidence on reading units. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 45-57.\r\nHealy, A. F. & Drewnowski, A. (1983). Investigating the boundaries of reading units: Letters detection in misspelled words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 413-426.\r\nHenderson, L. A. (1974). A word superiority effect without orthographic assisstance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 301 - 311.\r\nHenderson, L. A. (1982). Orthography and Word Recognition in Reading. N.Y.: Academic Press.\r\nHubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction, and functional architecture in the cat`s visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 160, 106-154.\r\nHuey, E.D. (1968). The Psychology and Pedagogy of Reading. Mass: MIT Press, 5th printing.\r\nHung, D.L. & Tzeng, O.J.L. (1981). Orthographic variations and visual information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 90(3), 377-414.\r\nJohnson, N.F. (1975). On the function of letters in word identification: Some data and a preliminary model. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Bahavior, 14, 17-29.\r\nJohnston, J. C. & McClelland, J. L. (1973). Visual factors in word perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 365-370.\r\nKimchi, R. & Palmer, S.E. (1985). Separability and integrality of global and local levels of hierarical patterns. Journal of Experimental of Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(6), 673-688.\r\nLaBerge, D. (1973). Attention and the measurement of perceptual learning. Memory and Cognition, 1, 268-276.\r\nLaBerge, D. & Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.\r\nMartin, M. (1979). Local and global processing: The role of sparsity. Memory and Cognition, 7,476-484.\r\nMcClelland, J. L. (1976). Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords. Jorunal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 80-91.\r\nMcClelland, J. L. & Johnston, J. C. (1977). The role of familiar units in perception of words and nonwords. Perception Psychophysics, 22(3), 249-261.\r\nMcClelland, J.L. & Mozer, M.C. (1986). Perceptual interactions in two-word displays: Familiarity and Similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(1), 1835.\r\nMorton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psylogical Review,76, 165-178.\r\nMozer, M.C. (1983). Letter migration in word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,9(4),531 –546.\r\nNavon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.\r\nSpoehr, K.T. & Smith, E.E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 71-89.\r\nSpoehr, K.T. & Smith, E.E. (1975). The role of orthographic and phonotactic rules in perceiving letter patterns. Journal of Experisental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 21-34.\r\nSelfridge, 0. (1959). Pattern recognition by machines and men. Scientific American, 203, 60-68.\r\nTheios, J. & Muise, J.G. (1976). The word identification process in reading. In N.J. Castellan & D. Pisoni (Eds.), Cognitive Theory II, N.J.: Erlbaum.\r\nTreisman, A. (1977). Focused attention in the perception and retrieval of multidimentional stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 22, 1-11.\r\nTreisman, A., Sykes, M. & Gelade, G. (1977). Selective attention and stimulus integration. In S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and Performance W, N. J.: Erlbaum.\r\nTreisman, A. & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12.97-136.\r\nTreisman, A. & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14,107-141.\r\nTreisman, A. & Paterson, R. (1984) Emergent features, attention and object perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(1), 12-31.\r\nTreisman, A. & Souther, J. (1985). Search asynmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114(3), 285-310.\r\nTreisman, A. & Souther, J. (1986). Illusory words: The roles of attention and top-down constraints in conjoining letters to form words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(1), 3-17.\r\nTzeng, O.J.L. (1981). Overview: Relevancy of experimental psychology to reading instruction. In O.J.L. Tzeng & H. Singer (Eds.), Perception of Print: Reading Research in Experimental Psychology, N.J.; Erlbaum.\r\nTzeng, O.J.L. & Wang, W.S.-Y. (1983). The first two R`s: The way different languages reduce speech to script affects how visual information is processed in the brain. American Scientist,71(3), 238-243.\r\nTzeng, O.J.L. , Hung, D. L. & Wang, W. S. -Y. (1977). Speech recoding in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3.621-630.\r\nVirzi, R.A. & Egeth, H.E. (1984). Is meaning implicated in illusory conjunctions? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 573-580.\r\nWheeler, D.D. (1970). Processess in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 59-85. | zh_TW |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html | 115 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.