Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96452| 題名: | 國小教師生涯階梯制度規劃與評審指標之研究 | 作者: | 楊慶麟 | 貢獻者: | 邱錦昌 楊慶麟 |
日期: | 1997 | 上傳時間: | 11-May-2016 | 摘要: | In Taiwan, elementary school teachers get the license and start teaching career when they have past many examinations and different tests. For decades later, most of them get same treatment, social status, regardless of teaching ability or job efforts.\r\n Difference between teacher salary scales merely lies on teaching years, it doesn’t depends on teaching accountabilities and performances, such “thirty years and zero scholastic credit” system makes teachers self-development gradually dilatory and professional images becoming declined daily.\r\n During teaching career, from graduation to retirement, a novice teacher goes through youth, manhood, middle adult and old ages, may not know guidelines to follow, if without any career development program to assist them.\r\n “Elementary School teacher Career Ladder Program” indicate to encourage teacher self-fulfillment, attend school or social institution various studies, participate academic activities and research. From evaluation aspect, it included three steps. First, any teacher who attends program voluntary have to be examined by study, writing, research, service years and annual accountabilities evaluation grades.\r\n Conclusion shows that:\r\nI. Teacher careere ladder correlative issues:\r\n1. Study channel and content can’t satisfy elementary school teachers.\r\n2. “Public school teacher service performance evaluation rules” should be amend as early as possible.\r\n3. Teacher Career Ladder system have gradually formed in Taiwan.\r\n4. Career Ladder can enhance teacher professional images.\r\n5. Different age of teachers have their own study requirement.\r\n6. College and university with education courses attract more teacher study participation.\r\n7. Domestic credit study is the best pattern for most teacher.\r\nII. About Careere ladder implementation opinion:\r\n1. Ladder divided 3 to 5 grades gets much support.\r\n2. Intern teacher should be brought into Ladder system.\r\n3. Study times are the most important check item of teacher qualification.\r\n4. Teaching performance students counseling & service zeal are the most important evaluation items.\r\n5. School teacher representative must be an evaluation member and have to be in the majority.\r\n6. Most sample agree “merit pay and add research fare refer to university personnel system” as an award.\r\n7. Every grade qualification has a time limit.\r\n8. There are no number proportion limitation at Ladder different grade.\r\nIII. Post-implementation questions and other opinions:\r\n1. Evaluation is the most crux.\r\n2. Teacher opposition and label action may be a resistance and obstruction. | 參考文獻: | 于光遠(1991)。教育人才素質。河南省:河南教育出版社。\r\n中共國家教委計畫建設司(1994)。中國教育事業統計年鑑1993。北京:人\r\n民教育出版社，62-63, 82-83。\r\n王以仁、陳芳玲、林本喬(民81 )。教師心理衛生。台北:心裡出版社。\r\n王受榮(民67 )。國民小學教師角色取向之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研\r\n究所碩士論文，未出版。\r\n王保進(民82 )。高等教育表現指標之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士\r\n學位論文，未出版。\r\n王家通(民70 )。教師專門職業論。台灣教育，365，23-35。\r\n王為國(民84 )。國小教師專業自主:一所國小個案研究。國立台中師範學\r\n院初等教育研究所論文，未出版。\r\n王素芸(民84 )。多重目標決策模式應用於國民中學入學方式選擇之研究。\r\n國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。\r\n白雲霞(民85 )。美國中小學專業階梯制度之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育\r\n研究所碩士論文，未發表。\r\n行政院教育改革審議會(民84) 。教育改革第二期報告書。台北:行政院教\r\n育改革審議會。\r\n行政院教育改革審議會(民85 )。教育改革總報告書。台北:行政院教育改\r\n革審議會。\r\n何秀珠(民83 )。國小男女性別角色與學生學校適應學業成就之研究。國立\r\n政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。\r\n何福田、羅瑞王(民81) 0 教育改革與教師專業化。載於中華民國師範教育\r\n學會主編，教育專業(1 -31 )。台北;師大書苑。\r\n林邵仁(民85 )。高級中學輔導工作評鑑指標之研究。國立政治大學教育研\r\n究所碩士論文，未出版。\r\n林清江(民70 )。教師職夜聲望與專業形象之調查研究。載於中國比較教育\r\n學會主編，世界師範教育改革動向(287-381 )。台北;華欣。曾喜城(民\r\n76 )。教師應該是專業嗎?。師友月刊，241 ` 30-31 0\r\n林清江、簡茂發等(民81 )。我國教師職業聲望與專業形象之調查研究。台\r\n北:教育部。\r\n林彩岫(民76 )。國民中學教師專業自主性研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研\r\n究集刊，31 ` 243-258 。\r\n林幸台(民78 )。我國國小教師生涯發展之研究。輔導學報，12, 265-297 。\r\n範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。\r\n李俊湖(民81 )。國小教師專業成長與教學校能關係之研究。國立台灣師範\r\n大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。\r\n吳裕益(民81 )。師院結業生就請動機、在校成績與之決教學效能關係之研\r\n究。台北:教育部。\r\n吳家瑩(民67 )。國中教師專業判斷之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所\r\n碩士論文，未出版。\r\n吳幼吾(民64 )智能不足班教師專業態度之調查研究。國立台灣師範大學教\r\n育研究所碩士論文，未發表。\r\n吳武雄(民70 )。國中教師學校認同之調查研究o 國立台灣師範大學教育研\r\n究所碩士論文，未出版。\r\n吳政達(民84 )。階層分析法(AHP) 與模糊評估法(FEM) 在學前教育指標\r\n係統之應用。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。\r\n余安邦(民85) 。教師專業的神話與弔詭:從台北縣市國小學開放教育談起。\r\n教改通訊，25 ` 37 一位。\r\n紀文祥等人(民82 )。中等學校教師在職進修教育之研究。台北;教育部。\r\n秦夢群(氏77 )。教育行政理論與應用。台北:五南圖書出版公司。\r\n高強華(民77 )。教師生涯發展及其影響因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學教\r\n育研究所集刊，30 ` 113-133 。\r\n高強華(民81 )。教育社會化研究及其在師資母育上的意義。載於中華民國\r\n師範教育學會主編:教育專業(53-88 )。台北:師大書苑。郭王霞(民\r\n81 )。美國教學專業化運動的發展現況。載於中華民國師範教育學會主\r\n編:教育專業(333-348) 。台北:師大書苑。\r\n黃隆民(民74 )。國民中學教師角色衝突與工作滿意之關係。國立台灣師範\r\n大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。\r\n黃三吉(民81 )。台北市國民小學組織結構與教師工作倦怠關係之研究。國\r\n立政治大學教育研究所碩士諭文，未出版。\r\n黃武雄(民84 )。我們希望孩子長大成什麼樣子?見蕭志強譯:創造活動與\r\n兒童一御茶水女子大學附屬小學主題教學課程。台北:光佑文化事業公\r\n司。\r\n黃昆錦(氏79 )。各國教師專業之比較。中華民國比較教育學會、中華民國\r\n師範教育學會主編:國際比較師範教育學術研討會論文集。台北;師大\r\n書花。\r\n陳嘉陽(民72) 。國中教師工作環境知覺、工作滿意、與士氣之研究。國立台\r\n灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。\r\n陳春雄(民74 )。國民中學教務主任角色之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研\r\n究所碩士論文，未出版。\r\n舒緒緯(民79 )。國民小學教師溝通滿意與工作滿意關係之研究。國立台灣\r\n師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。\r\n楊振昇(民80 )。國民小學教師參與學校行政決定與工作士氣關係之研究。\r\n國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。\r\n鄭美俐(民72 )。國民小學校長行政決定之調查研究。師大教育研究所論文，\r\n未出版。\r\n施慧敏(民83 )。國民小學班級常規管理之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研\r\n究所碩士論文，未出版。\r\n書茂榮(1994) 0 穩定、優化與改革。四川:四川教育出版社。\r\n葉興華(民83 )。國小級任教師班級管理問題之研究。國立台灣師範大學教\r\n育研究所碩士論文，未發表。\r\n單小琳(民8日。從法令關角度看教師職級制度之可行性。載於蔡培\r\n村主編:教師生涯與職級制度(227-239) 。高雄:麗文文化公司。\r\n單文經(民79 )。教育專業知識的性質初探。中華民國師範教育學會主編:\r\n師範教育政策與問題。台北:師大書苑。\r\n單文經(民81 )。美國教學專業報酬制度改革的敢示，載於中華民國師範教\r\n育學會主編;教育專業(301-332 )。台北;施大書苑。\r\n程為山(民7日。國中教師專業領導的現況及其影響因素。國立台灣師範大\r\n學教育研究所集刊，28 。\r\n楊思偉(民85 )。日本教師職級制度及其對我國的是啟示與借鏡。載於蔡培\r\n村主編:教師生涯與職級制度(89-113) 。高雄:麗文文化公司。\r\n陳奎喜(民82 )。教育社會學研究。台北:師大書苑。黃昆錦(民82 )。教\r\n師權的理念。高市鐸聲，4(1) `13-17 。\r\n馮朝霖(民84 ) 。自覺覺他:教育主體性的困境與出路。教師人權`的，65,1 。\r\n張鈿富(氏的a) 。教育政策分析一理論與實務。台北:五南圖書出版公司。\r\n張鈿富富(民85b) 。 「教育學導論」教材大綱。台北:教育部。\r\n張春興(氏72 )。從師大學生的求學心態檢討師教法「加強師範生專業精神」\r\n構想的成效。師大教育心理學報，時，1-28 。\r\n張德銳(民85 )。我國實施教師職級制度所面臨的問題與國應策略，載於蔡\r\n培村主編:教師生涯與職級制度(241-266) 。高雄;麗文文化公司。\r\n歐用生(民84 )。中小學教師進修教育盲點與突破。教改通訊，4 ` 14-15 。\r\n薛化元(民79) 。教師地位與權利義務一以台灣中小學教師為中心。台北:\r\n國家政策研究資料中心。\r\n教育部(民85 )。中華民國教育統計。台北:教育部。\r\n國家教育委員會政策法規司編(1993 )。中華人民共和國基礎教育現行法規彙\r\n;編，1949-1992 `頁315-318 。北京:北京師範大學出版社。\r\n謝文全(民74 )。教育行政。台北:文景出版社。\r\n鄧振源與曾國雄(民78a) 。層級分析法(AHP) 的內涵特性與應用(上) 。\r\n中國統計學報，27(6) , 5-22.\r\n鄧振源與曾國雄(民78b) 。層級分析法(AHP) 的內涵特性與應用(下)。\r\n中國統計學報，27(7) , 1-20.\r\n羅文基(民85 ) 。從生涯理論論教師職級制度的推展。載於蔡培村主編:教\r\n師生涯與職級制度(1-26) 。高雄:麗文文化公司。\r\n湯維玲(民80 ) 。我國中學師資培育專業教育課程之研究。國立台灣師範大\r\n學教育研究所集刊，33，11-226 。\r\n蔡培村等人(民83 )。中小學教師生涯進階典等級劃分可行性之研究。台北:\r\n教育部中教司。\r\n蔡清華(民85 )。美國教師職級制度及其對我國的啟示與借鏡。載於載於蔡\r\n培村主編:教師生涯與職級制度(53-88) 。高雄:麗文文化公司。\r\n蔡碧克車(氏85 )。從教師專業成長論中小學教師職級制度的實施。載於蔡培\r\n村主編:教師生涯與職級制度(27-52) 。高雄:麗文文化公司o\r\n劉英杰(1993)。中國教育大事典1949-1990 頁。浙江:浙江教育出版社\r\n謝玲芬(氏78 )。多目標(多準則)評估技術之探討及其在組織績效評估之\r\n應用。清華大學工業工程研究所碩士論文，未出版。\r\n饒見維(氏85 )。教師專業發展:理論與實務。台北:五南圖書出版公司。\r\n龔寶善(民7 1)。教師專業精神的培育和弘揚。載於中國教育學會主編:教育\r\n組織與專業精神(179-192) 。台北:華欣文化公司\r\n\r\nAskling,B. (199l).Structural and organizational contexts of the teaching profession. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association(Chicago, IL,April 3-7,1991). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 335 353)\r\nBleuer, Jeanne Carole. (986). Evaluation of a model for analyzing the outcomes of a professional continuing workshop. University of Michigan. Ph. D. AAC8702687.\r\nBridges,E. (1968). The principal and the teachers:The problem of organizational change. In Richard Saxe(Ed. ),Perspectives on the changing role of the principal.Sprigfie1d, Il:Charles C. Thomas.\r\nBurden.P.R. (1981). Teacher` perceptions of their personal and professional development. Paper presented at the Midwestern Educational Research association. (Des Moines, lA, Nov. 20, 1981)\r\nBurden, P. R. (1990). Teacher Deve lopment. In W. R. Houson (Ed. ), Handbook of\r\nReasearch on Teacher Education:A Project of the Association of Teacher Educators. New York:Macmillan.\r\nBurke,P. J. (1987). Teacher Development. New York:The Falmer Press. Cohen,E.G. (1973). Open-space schools:The opportuinty to become ambitious. Sociology of Education, 46, 143-161.\r\nCornett, L.M. (1985) . Trends and emerging issues in career ladder plans. Educational Leadership, 43(3), 6-10.\r\nDeMoulin,D.F. ,Gryton, J. W. (l988).A measure of common variables associated with career stages as perceived by principals and teachers:Validation of a model for career development. Paper persented at the Meeting of Mid-South Education Research\r\nassociation. (Louisvi lIe, KY, Nov. 1988)\r\nDimond, C. T. P. (1988). Construing a career:A developmental view of teacher education and the teacher educator. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20,133-140.\r\nDerrick, D.C(1985).A study of the effects of the bartlesville public schools` instructional skills program on teacher anxiety,and teacher autonomy. Oklahoma State University. ED.D. (AAC8515248)\r\nDuckett, W. T. (1984). Learning about merit pay from business and industry. Bloomington, IN:Phi Delta Kappa Center for Evaluation, Development, and Research.\r\nEbmeier,H. & Hart,A.W. (1992).The effects of a Career Ladder Program on School Organization Process. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14,261-281.\r\nEdelfelt,R.A. (1985). Career Ladders:Then and Now. Educational Leadership, 43(3), 57-61.\r\nEye,G.G.,& Netzer,L.A. (1969). School administrators and instruction. Boston:Allyn and Bacon.\r\nFessler,R. (1985).A model for teacher professional growth and deveolopment. In P.Bruke & R.G.Heideman, (Eds. ),Career-long teacher education. Springfield, IL:C. C. Thomas.\r\nFranklin,H.L. (1988).Princip1e considerration and its relationship to teacher sense of of autonomy. University of Oregon. (DAI-A 49/09,p. 2466, Mar1989)(AAC 8825624)\r\nFuller,F.F. (1969). Concerns fo teachers:A developmental conceptual ization. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 207-226.\r\nGrigg,K. (1987). The effects of educational organizational structure on the professional bahavior of teachers. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Ph. D. (DAI-A48/07,p. 1600, Jan 1988)(AAC8722301)\r\nHawley, W. D. (1985) . Designing and implementing performance-based career ladder plans. Educational Leadership, 43(3), 57, 61.\r\nHart,S.P., & Marshall, J.D. (1992). The question of teacher professional ism. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 349 291)\r\nHayes,J .R.(1985).Three problems in teaching general skills.In S.F.Chipman,J.W.Segal & R.Glaser(Eds.),Thinging and learning skils:Volume 2 Research and open questions.Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum.\r\nHolmes Group.(1990).Tomorrow`s schools:Principles for the design of professional development schools.East Lansing, ML:Author.\r\nJohnson,K. N. (1991). Principal vision, environmental robustness,and teacher sence of autonomy in high schools(teacher autonomy). Portland State University. (DAI-A52/11,p. 3785,May 1992)(AAC9204372)\r\nJohbson,S,M. (1990). Teacher at work:Achieving success In our schools. New York:Basic.\r\nKrumboltz, J. D. ,Mitchell,A.M. ,& Jones,G.B. (1978). A social learning theory of career selection. In J. M. Whiteley & A.Rensnikoff, (Eds. ),Career counselling. Monterey,CA:Brooks/Cole.\r\nLarson, M.S. (1990). In the matter of experts and professionals or how impossible it is leave nothing unsaid. In R. Torstendahl & M. Burrage. (Eds. ), the formation of professions: Knowledge, state and strategy. London: SAGE.\r\nLerman, J.L. (1990). Merit pay an career ladders:Part of the problem or part of the solution. In S. B. Bacharach(Ed. ), Advances in research and theories of school management and educational policy(pp. 95-l22 ).Greenwich,Connecticut:Jai Press Inc.2\r\nLevinson, D. J. ,Darrow,C. N. ,Klein,E.B. ,Levinson,M.H.,& Mckee, B. (978). The seasons of a man`s life. N. Y. :Knopf. \r\nLiberman,M. (1956). Education as Profession. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.\r\nLortie,D.C. (1975). School Teacher:A Sociological study.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.\r\nMaclean,R. (1992). Teacher`Career and Promotion Pattern. London:The Falmer Press.\r\nMcphie.W.E.,& Kinney.L.B. (1959). Professional autonomy in education. The ournal of Teacher Education, 10(3),285-290.\r\nMcCllelland, V. Alan. (1989). Reflections on a changing concept of teacher education. V. Alan Mcclelland and Ved P. Vrma(eds): Asvances in teacher education. London: Routledge.\r\nMelson,D.E.& Ross, J.D. (1991). A Follow-Up Satewide Sruvey of Teacher Opinions Concerning Utah`s Career Ladder Program. Utah State:Utah State Office of Education.\r\nMitchell,D.E. ,Ortiz,F.L,& Mitchell,T.K. (1987). Work orientation and Job performance:The cultural basis of teaching rewards and inentives.Albany,NY:State University of New York Press.\r\nOlson,L. (1986). Pioneering state teacher-incentive plans In Folrida, Tennessee still under attack. Education Week, 6.\r\nOja,S. N. (1989). Teacher: Ages and stages of adult development. In M.L.Holly & C.S.McLoughlin(Eds. ),Perspectives on the Teacher Professional Development. Mew York:The Falmer Press.\r\nOwens,R.G. (1991). Organizational behavior in education (4th ed. ).Boston:Allyn and Bacon.\r\nParsons, R. J. (1985). Faculty`s perception of autonomy In the workplace. University of Denver. University of Denver. Ph. D. (DAI46/06A,p. 1534)(AAC 8517555)\r\nPickle, J. (1985). Toward teacher maturity. Journal of Teacher education, 36(4), 55-59.\r\nRaelin, Joseph A. (1986) . The clash of culture. Boston: Haward Business Schoo I Press.\r\nRaelin, J.A. (1989).How to give your teachers autonomy without losing control . Executive Educator, 11(2), 19-20.\r\nRosenholtz, S. J. (1984). Myths:Political myths about reforming teaching. Denver, co: Education Commission of the State.\r\nSacks,S.R. ,& Eisenetein, H. (1976). Feminism and psychological autonomy:A study in decision-making. Paper Psychological Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 145-294)\r\nSmith,S. (1983). Improving the attractiveness of the K-12 teaching profession in California.Sacremento,CA:California State Department of Education.Schlechty,P.C. (1989).Career ladders:A good idea going awry. In\r\nT. J. Sergiovanni & J. H. Moore(Eds. ), Schooling for tomorrow: Directing reforms to issues that count(pp.356-373).Boston:Allyn and Bacon.\r\nSuper, D. E. (1957). The psychology of careers. N. Y. : Harper & Row. \r\nSuper, D. E. (1976). Career education and the meaning of work. Monographs on career education. Washington, D. C. :The Office of Career education, U.S. Office of Education.\r\nSuper, D. E. (1 9S4). Career and life development. In D. Brown, 1. Brooks, &\r\nAssociates, (Eds. ),Career choice and development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.\r\nThe Oxford English Dictionary(2nd ed. )(19S9).Oxford:Clarendon.\r\nWagner, 1. A. (1 9S5). Ambigui ties and possibilities in California’s mentor teacher program. Educational Leadership,43(3),23-29.\r\nWebster`s Third New International Dictionary. (19S6).Chicago:Merriam-Webster.\r\n\r\nWeinstein, Mark I., Bond Systematic Risk and the Option Pricing Model. The Journal of finance, Vol. 38, No. 5, December 1983, 1415-1429.\r\nWest, R. R., An Alternative Approach to Predicting Corporate Bond Ratings. Journal of Accounting Research, Spring 1970, 118-127.\r\nWilliams. Joseph T., Capital Asset Prices with Heterogeneous Beliefs, Journal of Financial Economics 5, 1977, 219-39.\r\nWilson. C. A., A Model of Insurance Markets with Incomplete Information. Journal of Economic Theory 16. 1977. 167-207.\r\nYamey, B. S., Predatory Price Cutting: Notes and Comments. Journal of Law and Econmics, Vol. 15, 1972. 129-142.\r\nYellen, J. I., Efficiency Wage Models of Unemployment. The American Economics Review, 74, 1984, 200-205. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 教育學系 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G91NCCV0082012 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html | 115 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.