Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96462
題名: 國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係研究
作者: 劉春榮
貢獻者: 毛連塭<br>林邦傑
劉春榮
關鍵詞: 組織結構
組織承諾
學校效能
Organizational stucture
Organizational commitment
Effectiveness
日期: 1993
上傳時間: 11-May-2016
摘要: 本研究旨在探討國民小學學校組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能的關係;其次比較分析教師人口變項類別、學校環境變項類別在學校組織結構、組織承諾及學校效能上的差異;並尋找有效預測學校效能的變項。\r\n研究採問卷調查法,以自編「國民小學組織結構量表、國民小學組織承諾量表及國民小學學校效能量表三部份。受試包括臺灣地區190所公立國民小學的1415名教師,問卷回收率達71 80%。回收問卷經統計處理,獲得以結論:\r\n一、學校組織結構正式式、專門化愈高,則學校效能不論在校長領導、行政溝通、學習環境、課程與教學、學生行為表現、學生學習表現及整體學校效能均有愈高的現象。\r\n二、學校組織結構集中化、傳統化愈高,則學校效能不論在校長領導、行政溝通、學習環境、課程與教學、學生行為表現、學生學習表現及整體學校效能均有愈低的現象。\r\n三、學校組織承諾其認同程度、努力意願、留職傾向或整體組織承諾愈高,則學校效能不論在校長領導、行政溝通、學習環境、課程與教學、學生行為表現、學生學習表現及整體學校效能均有愈高的現象。\r\n四、學校組織結構正式化、專門化愈高,則學校組織承諾不論在認同程、努力意願、留職傾向及整體學校組織承諾均有愈高的現象。\r\n五、學校組織結構集中化、傳統化愈高,則學校組織承諾不論在認同程度、努力意願、留職傾向及整體學校組織承諾均有愈低的現象。\r\n六、我國國民小學學校組織結構整體而言:其正式化及專門化程度頗高;而集中化及傳統化程度較低。高低排序依次為專門化、正式化、傳統化、集中化。\r\n七、我國國民小學學校組織承諾整體而言:不論在認同程度、努力意願、留職傾向及整體組織承諾均相當不錯。其高低排序依次為努力意願、整體組織承諾、留職傾向、認同程度。\r\n八、我國國民小學學校效能整體而言:校長領導、課程與教學、學生行為表現較佳;而學生學習表現、學習環境、行政溝通及整體學校效能次之。其高低排序依次為校長領導、課程與教學、學生行為表現、學生學習表現、學習環境、整體學校效能、行政溝通。\r\n九、不同的教師人口變項類別,不論在學校組織結構、學校組織承諾或學校效能,多有所不同,但因不同的分量表而情況不一。\r\n十、不同的學校環境變項類別,不論在學校組織結構、學校組織承諾或學校效能,多有所不同,但因不同的分量表而情況不一。\r\n十一、學校效能的預測由於分量表不同,而其有效的預測變項亦有所差異。整體來講,認同、正式化、集中化、專門化、傳統化,一般大學畢業的教師、性別、兼任組長的教師、創校10-20年的學校、13-14班的學校及留職傾向,能有效預測學校整體效能。但各變項的預測力不同,且影響的方向也不一樣。\r\n根據研究所得,本研究分別對教育行政機關、學校行政單位、學校校長及教師與未來研究者提出建議。
參考文獻: 丁虹(民76 )企業文化與組織承諾之關係研究。政治大學企\r\n業管理所博士論文。\r\n毛連爐、吳清山、劉春榮、湯志民、陳明終(民81 )一九九二\r\n年國民教育政策及問題調查報告。台北市:國立教育資料館。\r\n方德隆(民75 )國民中學組織結構與組織效能關係之研究。台\r\n灣師範大學教育所碩士論文。\r\n中華民國比較教育學會、中華民國師範教育學會(民81 )國際\r\n比較師範教育學術研討會論文集。台北市:師大書苑。\r\n尹衍樑(民77 )組織變革策略對組織承諾之影響研究一以潤泰\r\n工業股份有限公司電腦化為例。政治大學企業管理所博士論文。\r\n王文科(民78 )認知發展理論與教育一皮亞傑理論的應用。台\r\n北市:五南圖書公司。\r\n王家通、曾燦燈(民75 )教育行政學一理論、研究與實際。高\r\n雄市:復文圖書出版社。\r\n王秋絨(民70 )國民中學組織環境對於教師角色壓力的影響。\r\n台灣師範大學教育所碩士論文。\r\n王雲五主編(民65 )雲五社會科學大辭典。台北市:台灣商務\r\n印書館。\r\n王溪興(民76 )中央警官學校組織效能之評估。中興大學公共\r\n行政所碩士論文。\r\n台北市政府教育局(民的)台北市八十學年度國民小學評鑑報\r\n告。台北市:台北市政府教育局。\r\n田竹軍、嚴世傑譯(民79 ) SPSS/PC +高等統計篇。台北市:儒\r\n林圖書公司。\r\n田長莫譯William G.S. 著(民60 )組織論。台北市:國立編譯館。\r\n白崇亮(民75 )組織承諾研究:理論與實證。管理評論,頁30-51 。\r\n朱金池(民80 )影響組織承諾因素之研究。警政學報,第19\r\n期,頁111-128 。\r\n朴英培(民77 )工作價值觀、領導型態、工作滿足與組織承諾\r\n關係之研究一以韓國電子業為例。政治大學企業管理所博士論文。\r\n江永森(民75 )組織文化與工作滿意及工作績效之關係。中國\r\n文化大學企業管理所碩士論文。\r\n何褔田(民80 )面對當前教育。高雄市:復文圖書出版社。\r\n呂紀嘉(民71 )中外銀行員工個人特性、工作特性、工作經驗\r\n與組織承諾之關係。政治大學企業管理所碩士論文。\r\n杜聲鋒(民77 )拉康結構主義精神分析學。台北市:遠流出版社。\r\n余德成(民80 )員工離職意願之研究一以楠梓加工出口區女性\r\n員工為例。中山大學企業管理所碩士論文。\r\n吳再居(民73 )官僚化與組織效能關係之研究。中興大學公共\r\n政策所碩士論文。\r\n吳定、張潤書、陳德禹(民80 )。行政學。台北市:國立空中大學。\r\n吳武雄(民70 )國中教師學校認同之調查研究。臺灣師範大學\r\n教育所碩士論文。\r\n吳清山(民78 )國民小學管理模式與學校效能關係之研究。政\r\n治大學教育所博士論文。\r\n吳清山(民79 )學校環境與學校效能,載於中華民國學校建築\r\n研究學會編:當前學校建築基本問題研究。台北市:臺灣書店。\r\n吳清山(民80 )學校行政。台北市:心理出版社。\r\n吳清山(民81 )學校效能研究。台北市:五南圖書公司。\r\n吳清基(民的)國民中學組織結構與教師工作滿意之關係。臺\r\n灣師範大學教育所碩士論文。\r\n吳清基(民79 )教育與行政。台北市:師大書苑。\r\n吳挽瀾(民65 )行政組織與管理。台北市:文景書局。\r\n吳璧如(民79 )國民小學組織文化與組織效能關係之研究。高\r\n雄師範大學教育所碩士論文。\r\n吳麗芬(民75 )國民小學組織結構正式化集中化與教師工作動\r\n機之關係。臺灣師範大學教育所碩士論文。\r\n周新富(民的)國民中學教師專業承諾、教師效能信念與學生\r\n學業成就關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育所碩士\r\n論文。\r\n邱文忠(民72 )高級中等學校校長領導方式與教師服務精神之\r\n關係。臺灣師範大學教育所碩士論文。\r\n林世昌(民76 )我國會計人員角色壓力與工作滿足、組織承諾\r\n的關係。政治大學會計所碩士論文。\r\n林生傳(民71 )教育社會學。高雄市:復文書局。\r\n林邦傑(民75 )統計方法的選擇與統計電腦套裝程式的使用一\r\nSPSSX 、SAS 、BMDP 應用指引。台北市:正昇教育科\r\n學社。\r\n林良楓(民73 )會計師事務所查帳員工作滿足與組織承諾之研\r\n究。政治大學會計所碩士論文。\r\n林東泰(民79 )北市報業編採人員之專業與組織承諾研究。台\r\n灣師範大學社會教育所碩士論文。\r\n林清山(民的)心理與教育統計學。台北市:東華書局。\r\n林清山(民的)多變項分析統計法。台北市:東華書局。\r\n林新發(民79 )我國工業專科學校校長領導行為、組織氣氛與\r\n組織績效關係之研究。臺灣師範大學教育所博士論文。\r\n林靜如(民79 )台北市國小教師工作經驗、內外控信念與組織\r\n承諾的關係。政治大學教育所碩士論文。\r\n林寶山(民的)美國教育制度及改革動向。台北市:五南圖書\r\n出版公司。\r\n施振典(民80 )文化中心組織結構與成員工作倦怠關係之研\r\n究。臺灣師範大學社會教育所碩士論文。\r\n姜占魁(民75 )人群關係。台北市:正中書局。\r\n姜占魁(民80 )組織行為與行政管理。台北市:自印。\r\n柯惠玲(民78 )工作滿足、工作績效與離職傾向之關係研究。\r\n政治大學企業管理所碩士論文。\r\n唐遠榮(民74 )我國高級科技人員性格特質、工作需求及組織\r\n氣氛與組織承諾關係之研究。台北市:華泰書局。\r\n秦夢群(民77 )教育行政理論與應用。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。\r\n馬傑明(民68 )組織階層化之研究。政治大學公共行政所碩士論文。\r\n郭丁榮譯(民80 )明茲伯格結構架構概述一兼評學校組織的特\r\n性。現代教育, 6 ` 23 `頁115-127 。\r\n梁瑞安(民79 )國小教師組織溝通、角色壓力與組織承諾關係\r\n之研究。高雄師範大學教育所碩士論文。\r\n曹萃翎(民73 )我國企業界技術專業人員離職意願之探討。政\r\n治大學企業管理所碩士論文。\r\n曹慧玲(民77 )我國民營企業會計人員組織承諾與專業承諾之\r\n研究。政治大學會計所碩士論文。\r\n陸鵬程(民70 )大台北地區加油站員工工作滿足及組織承諾之\r\n探討。政治大學企業管理所碩士論文。\r\n教育部(民81 )中華民國教育統計。台北市:教育部。\r\n教育部高教司(民82 )大學院校教育評鑑。台北市:教育部。\r\n張水金(民80 )美國教育目標。(未出版)\r\n張任琦(民78 )會計師事務所查帳人員組織承諾與專業承諾衝\r\n突之相關研究。政治大學會計所碩士論文。\r\n陳金水(民78 )國民中學教師制握信念、工作經驗與組織承諾\r\n之關係。高雄師範大學教育所碩士論文。\r\n陳明璋(民的)組織效能研究途徑及其衡量。中國行政, 29\r\n期,頁47 -71 。\r\n陳明璋(民71 )組織效能及其決定因素關係之研究。政治大學\r\n學報`的期,頁117-149 。\r\n陳明璋(民74 )組織環境策略結構與效能文獻探討。台北市:\r\n華泰書局。\r\n陳奎熹(民68 )學校組織之社會學分析。師大教育所主編:教\r\n育社會學。台北市:偉文圖書公司。\r\n陳淑娟(民77 )過度辨正效果之研究一酬賞種類、酬賞方式、\r\n認知發展階段對內在興趣變化的影響。國立政治大學\r\n心理所碩士論文。\r\n陳淑嬌(民78 )國民中學校長領導型式、教師工作投入與組織\r\n效能關係之研究。高雄師範大學教育所碩士論文。\r\n陳惠雯(民74 )職業婦女的個人需求、上司的權力基礎與組織\r\n承諾關係之研究。政治大學企業管理所碩士論文。\r\n張德銳(民81 )國民小學校長行政表現、組織氣氛、組織效能\r\n調查研究。新竹市:先登出版社。\r\n張潤書(民79 )行政學。台北市:三民書局。\r\n陳慶瑞(民77 )我國國民小學組織效能之研究。屏東師院學\r\n報, 1 期,頁333-378 。\r\n湯志民(民80 )台北市國民小學學校建築規畫、環境知覺與學\r\n生行為之相關研究。政治大學教育所博士論文。\r\n游進年(民79 )國民中學學校氣氛與學校效能關係之研究。臺\r\n灣師範大學教育所碩士論文。\r\n彭文賢(民75 )結構設計與組織效能的關係0 公共政策學報,\r\n9 期。頁1-14 。\r\n彭剛力(民70 )認識組織承諾。幼獅月刊,頁32-37 。\r\n黃三吉(民81 )台北市國民小學組織結構與教師工作倦怠關\r\n係。台灣師範大學教育所碩士論文。\r\n黃昆輝(民77 )教育行政學。台北市:東華書局\r\n黃秀霜(民76 )教育行政人員成就動機、工作特性與組織承諾\r\n之相關研究。政治大學教育所碩士論文。\r\n黃秀霜(民78 )教育行政人員組織承諾之剖析。國教研究雙月\r\n刊, 6 期,頁44-鈞。\r\n黃炳煌(民75 )從美國教育改革趨向展望我國教育的革新。載\r\n於中華民國比較教育學會主編: 教育革新的趨勢與展\r\n望。台北市:臺灣書局。\r\n黃振球(民79 )學校管理與績效。台北市:師大書苑。\r\n黃國隆(民75 )中學教師的組織承諾與專業承諾。政治大學學\r\n報, 53 期,頁55-84 。\r\n黃開義(民73 )工作特性、個人特質、領導型態、工作滿足與\r\n組織承諾對離職意願之影響。中原大學機械工程所碩\r\n士論文。\r\n黃瑞祺(民70 )結構功能論選讀。台北市:巨流出版社。\r\n黃耀卿(民74 )國民中學組織結構與組織氣氛關係之研究。臺\r\n灣師範大學教育所碩士論文。\r\n黃瓊慧(民74 )企業責任中心主管激勵與組織承諾之研究。政\r\n治大學企業會計所碩士論文。\r\n葉啟政(民71 )結構、意識與權力:對社會結構概念的檢討。\r\n載於社會學理論與方法研討會論文集。台北市:中央\r\n研究院民族研究所。\r\n楊啟良(民71 )個人特質、組織氣氛及組織承諾之研究。政治\r\n大學企業管理所碩士論文。\r\n楊煥烘(民77 )國小校長領導型式與教師成熟度之配合對教師\r\n工作滿足及組織效能認知的影響。政治大學教育所碩\r\n士論文。\r\n楊濟華(民75 )我國環境保護機關組織效能之研究。中興大學\r\n公共政策所碩士論文。\r\n廖素華(民67 )國小校長領導方式、教師人口特質與教師工作\r\n滿足的關係。政治大學教育所碩士論文。\r\n劉春榮、林建平、張蘭婉(民73 )生活中的人際關係。台北\r\n市:天馬出版社。\r\n鄭得臣(民74 )領導型態、角色壓力、核心生活興趣與組織承\r\n諾的關係。政治大學心理所碩士論文。\r\n鄭進了(民79 )國民小學校長運用權力策略、行政溝通行為與\r\n學校組織氣氛之關係。政治大學教育所博士論文。\r\n鄭燕萍(民76 )教育的功能與效能。香港:廣角鏡出版有限公司。\r\n鄭讚源(民73 )組織效能與順從相關因素之分析。臺灣大學農\r\n業推廣所碩士論文。\r\n謝小苓(民77 )好學校的必備條件。載於七月,教育資料文摘,頁4-13 。\r\n謝文全(民78 )教育行政論文集。台北市:文景出版社。\r\n謝文全(民80 )教育行政。台北市:文景出版社。\r\n謝文豪(民76 )國民中學組織結構與組織溝通之關係。台灣師\r\n範大教育所碩士論文。\r\n謝文豪(民80 )組織理論的類別與教育組織理論的研究。初等\r\n教育學報, 1 期,頁23-鈞。\r\n蔡培村(民74 )國民中小學校長領導特質、權力基礎、學校組\r\n織結構及組織氣氛與教師工作滿意闕係之比較研究。\r\n政治大學教育所博士論文。\r\n蘇育任(民74 )國民中學組織結構對教師疏離感之影響。臺灣\r\n師範大學教育所碩士論文。\r\n\r\n\r\nAnderson, B. D.(1974). An application of the bureaucratic\r\nmodel to the study of school administration.\r\nJournal of Educational Administration, 12, and\r\nMeyers, R.W. (1972). Bureaucratic theory and schools.\r\nAdministrator`s Notebook, 20, p.1-4.\r\nBarnard, C. I.(1938). Functions of Executive? Cambridge:\r\nHarvard University Press.\r\nBeker, H. S.(1960). Notes on the Concept of Commitment.\r\nAmerican Journal of sociology, 66, P.132-140.\r\nBidwell, C. E.(1965). The School as a Formal Oranization. in\r\nMarch, T. G., (Ed) Handlbook of Organization. chicago:\r\nRand Mcnally co.\r\nBishop, L. K. & George, J. R.(1973). Organizational Structure: A\r\nFactor Analysis of Structural Characteristics of\r\nPublic Elementary and Secondary Schools.\r\nEducational Administration Quarterly, 9, P.66-80.\r\nBlau, P. M.(1956). Bureaucracy in Modern- -Society. -New York:\r\nRandom House.\r\nBoyan, C. R. (1988). Handbook of Reserch on Education\r\nAdministration. New York: Longmman.\r\nBrown, D. J.(1992). The Recentralization of School Districts.\r\nEdueational-Policy.\r\nBuchanan, B.(1974). Building Organizational commitment: The\r\nSocialization of Managers in Work Organization. Administrative\r\nScience Quarterly, 19, P.533-546.\r\nBurke, P. J. & Reitzes, D. C.(1991). An Identity Theory Approach\r\nto Commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly.\r\nCamerson, K.(1978). Measuring Organizational Effectiveness in\r\nInstitutions of Higher Education. Administration\r\nScience Quarterly, Vol. 23, P.614.\r\nCampbell, J . P.(1977). On the Nature of Orgaaanizational\r\nEffectives. In New Perspectives on Organizational\r\nEffectives. ed. by Goodman, PS., Pennings, J. M. &\r\nAssociates. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers,P.22-29.\r\nCarpenter, H. H.(1971). Formal Organizational structural\r\nFactors and Perceived Job Satisfaction of classroom\r\nTeachers, Administrative Science Quarterly, 16. P .460-465.\r\nCheng, Y. C.(1990). Conception of School Effectiveness and\r\nModels of School Evaluation: -- A Dynamic Perspective.\r\nChinese University Education .Journal, V18, n1, P.47-61 \r\nChusmir, L.H. & Koberg, C. S.(1988). A Look at Sex Difference in\r\nthe Relationships between Religious Beliefs and\r\nWork Related Attitudes. Journal of Social Behavior\r\nand Personality, 3(1), P.37-48.\r\nChoi, Y.(1991). Structure, Business Strategy, and the Structure\r\nof Organizations: Effects on Performance. The University of Mississippi.\r\nClark, D. L., Lotto L. S. & Astuto, T. A.(1984). Effective Schools\r\nand School Improvement: A Comparative Analysis of\r\nTwo Lines of Inquiry. Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 20, No.3.\r\nCodianni, A. V. & Willam, G.(1983). More Effective Schooling\r\nfrom Research to Practice. New York: Clearing House\r\nand Urban Education.\r\nColeman, J. S.(1966). Equality of educational Opportunity. U.S.:\r\nGovernment Printing Office.\r\nCorwin, R. G.(1967). Education and Sociology of Complex\r\nOrganization, in D. H. Hanson et al., (Ed). Education-Sociological\r\nPerspectives, P.16-17.\r\nCoyle, L. M. & witcher, A. E. (1992). Transforming the Idea into\r\nAction: Policies and Practices to Enhance School Effectiveness.\r\nUrban Education, V26, n4, P.390-406.\r\nCrawford, J. H.(1986). Teacher Recruitment and Retention in a\r\nRural School District: A Case Study. Ph. D., Georgia\r\nState University. College of Education. Dissertation\r\nAbstracts Internatiuonal, 47/08A.\r\nDavis, G. A., & Thomas, M. A. (1989). Effective Schools and Effective Teachers. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.\r\nDean, J. S.(1989). Principals` Leadership and School Effecti veness:\r\nA Descriptive Study of The Principal`s Exercise\r\nof Authority and Influence in Effective and\r\nIneffective Elementary Schools Effective Schools.\r\nThe Pennsylvania State University.\r\nDevadoss, M.(1980). Power, involvement, and effectiveness in\r\nseven private college. Andhra Pradesh, India. Unpublished\r\ndactoral dissertation, Fordham University.\r\nDubin, R., Champoux, J. E. & Porter, L. W.(1975). Central Life\r\nInterests and Organizational Commitment of BuleCollar\r\nand clerical Workers. Administrative Science\r\nQuarterly, 20, P.411-421 \r\nEdmonds, R. R.(1979). Effective schools for the urban poor.\r\nEducational Leadership, 37, P.15-27.\r\nEismann, D. A.(1985). An Assessment of a Model of Educational\r\nand Organizational Effects. Dissertation Abstracts\r\nInternational, 46(02L P.309-310~A~\r\nEtzioni, A.(1964). Modern Organizations. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.\r\nFagenson, E. A.(1984). Women`s work Orientations: The Right\r\nStaff? Paper Presented at The Annual convention\r\nof the American Psychological Association. Toronto,\r\nOntario, Canada.\r\nFarrell, D. & Rusbul t, C. E.(1981). Exchange Variables as\r\nPredictors of Job Satisfaction, Job Commitment and\r\nTurnover: The Impact of Reward, Cost, Alteratives\r\nand Investment. Organizational Behavior and Human\r\nPerformance, 28, P.120-126.\r\nFeddema, H. J.(1992). The Superintendent`s Role in\r\nImplementing A District-wide strategic Plan. Northern\r\nIllinois University.\r\nFerris, K. R. & Aranya, N.(1983). A Comparison of Two\r\nOrganizational Commitment Scales. Personnel Psychology, V36 nl P.87-98.\r\nFestinger, L.(1964). Conflict, Decision, and Dissonance.\r\nStanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.\r\nFleishman, E. A.,(1953). The Description of Supervisory\r\nBehavior. Journal of applied Psychology, 37, P.1-6.\r\nGarcia, E. R.(~988). Organizational Commitment: Integration of\r\nthe Individual and the Organization Perspectives.\r\n(Ed. D., University of Massachusetts). Dissertation\r\nAbstracts International, 49/12A.\r\nGibson, J. L., Ivaaancevich, J. M. & Donnelly, Jr. J. H.(1976).\r\nOrganizations. Texas: Business Publications, Inc.\r\nGoodland, J. 1 (1984). A Place Called school Prospects for the\r\nfuture. New York: MeGraw-Hill Book Company.\r\nGoslin, D. A.(1965). The School in Com temporary Society.\r\nIllinosis: Scott, Foresman and company, P.133.\r\nGoni, G. G.(1989). The Relationship of Behaviors of secondary\r\nSchool Principals to School Effectiveness. in\r\nKaduna State, Nigeria. Fordham University.\r\nGreiner, L. E.(1972). Evalution and revalution as organizations\r\ngrow. Harvard Business Review, NO.4.\r\nHage, J.,(1968). An Axiomatic Theory of Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, P .289-320.\r\nHall, R. H.(1963). The concept of bureaucracy: An empirical assessment.\r\nAmerican Journal of Sociology, 69, P.32-40.\r\nHall, R. H.(1977). Organizations: Structure and Process.\r\nEnglewood, Cliff, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.\r\nHall, R. H.(1987). Organizations-struchures, Processes, and\r\nOutcomes. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall. Inc.\r\nHerrick, H. S.(1973). The Relationship of Organizational Structure\r\nto Teacher Motivation in Multiunit and Non-Multiunit\r\nElementary Schools. (Wisconsin University,\r\nMadison: Research and Development for Cognitive\r\nLeraning), ERIC Document ED 101442 \r\nHitt, M. A., Middlemist, R. D. & Mathis, R. 1 (1986). Management:\r\nConcepts and Effective Practice. Saint Paul: West Publishing Company.\r\nHoy, W. K .. Newland, W. & Blazovsky, R.(1977). Subordinate Loyalty\r\nto Superior, Esprit, and Aspects of Bureaucratic\r\nStructure, Educational Administration Quarterly, 13, P.71-85.\r\nHoy, W. K., & Ferguson, J.(1989). A theoretical framework and exploration\r\nof organizational effectiveness of\r\nschools. In J. L. Burdin (Ed.), School Leadership (p. 2\r\n59-274). Newbury Park, Ca.: Sage Publications, Inc.\r\nHoy, W. K. & Miskel. C. G.(1982). Educational Administration:\r\nTheory, Research and Practice. 2nd ed, New York: Random House.\r\nHoy, W. K. & Miskel. C. G.(1987). Educational Administration Theory:\r\nResearch and Practice. New York: Random House.\r\nHoy, W. K. & Miskel. C. G.(1987). Mingzberg`s structural framework\r\nIn Educational Administration: Theory Research\r\nand Practice. 3rd. New York: Random House.\r\nHrebiniak, L. G. & Alutto, J. A.(1972). Personal and Role Related\r\nFactors in the Development of\r\nOrganizational Commitment. Administrative Science\r\nQuarterly, 17, 4, P.555-573.\r\nHutchins, C. M.(1992). Site-Based Management Team Effectiveness\r\nand Attendance Rates/Achievemen Scores in\r\nOne Inner-City School District. University of Denver.\r\nImmegart, G. L. & Pilecki, F. J.(1970). Assessing Organizational\r\nOutput: A Framework and some Implications.\r\nEducational Administration Quarterly, P.62-76.\r\nIsherwood, G. & Hoy, W. K.(1973). Bureaucracy, Powerlessness,\r\nand Teacher Work Valuer. Journal of Educational\r\nAdministration, 11, P.124-138.\r\nIvancevich, J. M. & Donnelly, J. H.(1975). Relation of\r\norganizational structure to job satisfaction,\r\nanxiety-stress, and performance. Administrative\r\nScience Quarterly, 20,P.272-280.\r\nJaffe, M.(1990). The Road Less Traveled: An Alternative to the\r\nBureaucratic Model of Librarianship. Wilson Library\r\nBulletin, v65 n4 P.49-51 \r\nJohn, 1 (1984). A place Called school Prospects for the future.\r\nNew York: MoGraw-Hill.\r\nJohnson, N. A. & Holdaway, E. A.(1990). School Effectiveness\r\nand Principal`s Effectiveness and Job Satisfaction:\r\nA Comparison of Three School Levels.\r\nAlberta Journal of Educational Research, V36 n3 P.265-95.\r\nJoo, S. H.(1982). Relationships of school Bureaucratization, Elementary\r\nSchool Teachers` Professioal and Bureaucratic\r\nOrientation, Cionflict, and Job Satisfaction\r\nin a Selected School District. Dissertation Abstracts\r\nInternarional, 42(10), P.4229-A.\r\nKanter, R. M.(1968). Commitment and social Organization: A\r\nStudy of Commitment Mechanisms in Utopian Communities.\r\nAmerican Sociological Review, 33, P.499-517.\r\nKatz, D. & Kahn, R. L.(1978). The Social Psychology of\r\nOrganizations. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.\r\nKawakubo, M. K.(1987). Perception of Authority, Control, and\r\nCommitment in Japanese Organizations. Dissertation\r\nAbstracts International, 49, 01-A.\r\nKoch, J. L. & Steers. R. M.(1978). Job Attachment, Satisfaction,\r\nand Turnover among Public Sector Employees.\r\nJournal of Vocational Behavior, 12, P.119-128.\r\nKushman, J. W.(1990). The role of teacher workplace commitment\r\nin school effectiveness: A study of urban elementary\r\nand middle schools (Elementary Schools).\r\nDissertation Abstracts International, B51/06.\r\nLauglo, J.(1975). Teacher`s Social Origins, Career Comitment\r\nDuring University, and Occupational Attitudes.\r\nSocialogy of Education, Vol.48, P.287-307.\r\nLee, Y. T.(1988). Educational Effects on ` Organizational Commitment\r\nin the Travel Industry of America: The Case\r\nof Hotel Sales and Marketing Professionals. (Ed. D.,\r\nThe George Washington University). Dissertation\r\nAbstracts International. 49/09A.\r\nLevine, D. U. & Lezotte, L. W.(1990). Unusually Effective\r\nSchools. Madison: National Center for Effective\r\nSchools Research and Development. ,\r\nLibler, R. W.(1992). Effective Schools: The role of the central\r\noffice. contemporary Education.\r\nLindelow, J. et al.(1981). Participative decision -making. Dissertation\r\nAbstracts International, ED209742 \r\nLoscocco, K. A.(1990). Reactions to Blue-Collar Work: A Comparison\r\nof Women and Men. Work and Occupations.\r\nMackay, D. A.(1964). An empirical study of bureaucratic\r\ndimensions and their relations to other characteristics\r\nof school organization. Unpublished\r\nph. D. Dissertation, the University of Alberta, Edmonton.\r\nMachado Da Silva, C. L.,(1981). Organizational Effectiveness: A\r\nStudy of School Districts in Michigan. Dissertation\r\nAbstracts International, 41(09), P_3811-3812-A.\r\nMark w. Johnston et al.(1988).Performance and Job Satisfaction\r\nEffects on Salesperson Turnover:- A Replication\r\nand Extension. Journal of Busines Research. 16(1), P .67-83.\r\nMaslow M. A.(1970). Motivation and Personality. New York:\r\nHarper and Row.\r\nMatheson, N. S.(1991). The Influence of Organization-Based\r\nSelf-Esteem on Satisfaction and Commitment: An\r\nAnalysis of Age Differences. The University of Akron.\r\nMathieu, J. E. & Kohler, S. S.(1990). A Test of The Interactive\r\nEffects of Organizational commitment and Job Involvement\r\non Various Types of Absence. Journal of Vocational Behavior, V36, n1, P.33-44.\r\nMcCormack-Larkin, M., & Kritek, w. (1983). Milwaukee`s project\r\nRISE. Educational Leadership, 40, P.16-21 \r\nMcGrevin, C. 2 (1984). Teacher Participation in the Decision-Making\r\nProcess and its Relationship to\r\nOrganizational Commitment and Morale, (Ph. D.,\r\nGeorgia State University, College of Education).\r\nDissertation Abstracts International, 45/05A.\r\nMiller, S. K.(1983). The History of Effective Schools Reseach: A\r\nCritical Overview. Lansing Michigan State Department\r\nof Education .\r\nMintzberg, H(1979). The Structuring of Organizations.\r\nEnglewood Cliffs., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.\r\nMitchell, T. R.(1979). Organizational Behavior. Annual Review\r\nof Psychology, 30, P.243-281 \r\nMiskel, C. G., Glasnapp, D. & Hatley, R. (1975). A test of the inequity\r\ntheory for job satisfaction using\r\neducators` attitudes toward work motivation and\r\nwork incentives. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 11, 38-54.\r\nMiskel, C. G., Fevurly, R., & Stewart, J., (1979). Organizational\r\nStructures and Processes, Perceived School Effectiveness,\r\nLoyalty, and Job Satisfaction.\r\nEducational Administration Quarterly, 15, P.97-118.\r\nMondy, R. W., Sharplin, A., Holmes, R.E. & Flippo, D.(1986). Management:\r\nConcepts and Practices. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.\r\nMontesano, J. J.(1991). The structural and functional\r\ncharacteristics of schools that predict\r\neffectivenes (Middle schools). Rutgers the state\r\nuniversity of New Jersey: New Brunswick.\r\nMoriarty, J. K.(1989). Leadership, structure, and effectiveness\r\nof parochial secondary schools (Catholic Schools).\r\nRutgers the state university of New Jersey: New\r\nBrunswick.\r\nMorris, J. H. & Steers, R. M. (1980). Structural Influences on\r\nOrganizational commitment. Journal of Vocational\r\nBehavior, 17. P.50-57.\r\nMorris, J. H. & Sherman, J. D.(1981). Generalizability An\r\nOrganizational Commitment Model. Academy of Management\r\nJournal, 24, P.512-516.\r\nMorris, W.(1970). The American Heritage Dictionary of the\r\nEnglish. Language, Mei Ya Taiwan Edition.\r\nMorrow, P. C.(1983). Concept Redundanny in Organizational Research:\r\nThe Case of Work Ccommitment. Academy Management\r\nReview, 8(3),P.486-500.\r\nMortimore, ·P. & Sammons, P.(1987). New Evidence on Effective\r\nElementary School. Educational Leadership, P.4-8.\r\nMott, P. E.(1972). The Characteristics of Effective\r\nOrganizations. New York: Harper & Row.\r\nMowday, R. T., Steers, R. M. & Porter, L. W. (1979). The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. Journal of Vocational\r\nBehavior, 14, P.224-247\r\nMoyer, R. A.(1992). A Conceptual Analysis of the Status, Role\r\nand Funtion of chief Minority Affairs Administrators\r\non State-Assisted Universities in\r\nOhio_ Kent State University.\r\nMurphy, J. et al.(1985). School Effectiveness: A Conceptual\r\nFramework. The Educational Forum, 49(3), P.361-374.\r\nMurphy J., Hallinger, P., & Mesa, R. R.(1985). School effecti veness:\r\nchecking Progress and assumptions and developing\r\na role for state and federal government.\r\nTeachers College Record, 86(4), P.616-641 \r\nMurphy, J., weil, M., Hallinger, P. & Mitman, A., (1985). School\r\nEffectiveness: A Conceptual Framework.\r\nEducational forum, Vol.49, No.3, P.361-374\r\nNear, J : P. (1989). Organizational Commitment among Japanese\r\nand U. S. Workers. Organization Studies.\r\nNewell, J. (1975). Organization Development in Schools, in\r\nVincent Houghton, et al., (Ed.) Management in\r\nEduacation. London: The Open University Press, P.381 \r\nNicolaidis, A. G. (1991). Complexity, Structure, and Administrative Intensity: A Study of the Determinants and the Solutions to Complexity in profit and Nonprofit Organizations Information Theory,\r\nOrganizational Structure, Systems Theory. Columbia University.\r\nOgilvie, D. & Sadler D. R.(1979). Perceptions of School Effectiveness and its Relationship to Organizational Climate. The Journal of Educational Administration,\r\nVol. 17, No.2, P.140-14\r\nParsons, T.(1960). Structure and Process in Modern Societies.\r\nIllinoiss: The Free Press of Glence.\r\nPoole, B. J.(1988). A correlational study of the rela-t1onship\r\nbetween teacher maintenance and middle school\r\neffecftiveness. University of Northern Colorado.\r\nPorter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulion, P. V. (1974).\r\nOrganizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction and\r\nTurnover among Psychiatric Technicians. Journal\r\nof Applied Psychology, 59, P.603-609.\r\nPostman N., Weingartner C.(1991). The school book. New York:\r\nDelacorfe .\r\n.. Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J. & Hinnings, C. R.(1968). Dimensions of\r\norganizational structure. Administrative Science\r\nQuarterly, 13, P.56-105.\r\nPugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., & Hinings C. K.(1985). Writers on\r\nOrganizations. Culifornia: SAGE Publication, Inc.\r\nPugh, W. C.(1988). Ethnography and teacher efficacy: The case\r\nfor collaborative teacher involvement in school effectiveness. ED295304.\r\nPurkey, S. & Smith, M.(1983). Effective schools. A review. The\r\nElementary School Journal, 83, P.427-452 \r\nQuinn, R. F. Jr. (1985). The Relationship of Commitment on the\r\nPart of Lay Catholic Elementary School Principals\r\nin the United States to \" Selected personal\r\nVariables. (Ed. D., The Catholic University of\r\nAmerica). Dissertation Abstracts International. 46/05A.\r\nRandall, D. M.(1990). The Behavioral Expression of\r\nOrganizational Commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, v36, n2, P.210-24.\r\nReichers, A. E.(1985). A Review and Reconceptualization of\r\nOrganizational Commitment. Academy of Management\r\nReview, Vol. 10, No.3, P.465-476.\r\nReid, K., Hopkins, D. & Holly, P.(1987). Towards the Effective\r\nSchool: The Problems and Some Solutions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.\r\nRhodes, S. \" R. & Steers, R. M.(1979). Conventional vs. Worker\r\nOwned Organizations. in press. Human Relation.\r\nRichard, A. S., Philip J. R., Steven, 1 S., Ronald, T. M. &\r\nBrooklyn, D.(1972). Handbook of Organization development\r\nin school. National Press books.\r\nRobbins, S. P. (1991). Organizational Theory: Concept,\r\nControversies, and Applications. New Jersey: Prentice-\r\nHall International. Inc.\r\nRose, B. A.(1988). A study of the Relationship Between Affirmative\r\nAction Program Effectivenes and\r\norganization structure in higher education. University of massachusetts.\r\nRowan, B.(1985). The assessment of school effectiveness. In M.\r\nJ. Regina(ed). Reaching for Excellence an Effective\r\nSchools Sourcebook. Washington: US, Government\r\nPrinting Office.\r\nSagor, R. D. & Curley, J. L.(1991). Collaborative action research:\r\nCan it improve school effectiveness?\r\nSalancik, G. R.(1977). New directions in Organizational\r\nBeha vior. Chicago: St. Clair Press.\r\nSchrama, G. J. 1 (1991). Freedom of chcice in Organizational\r\nForms. Strategic choices of Organizational Structure\r\nand Information Technology at the Introduction\r\nof Personnel Information Systems. by Large Municipal\r\nOrganizations (Keuzevrijheid in Organisatievormen:\r\nStrategische Keuzes Rond Organisatiestructuur\r\nen Informatietenhnolog Bij Het Invoeren Van\r\nEen Personeelsinformatiesysteem Bij Grote\r\nGemeenten]. Universiteit Twente (The Netherlands).\r\nSeashore, S. E.(1983). A framework for an intergrated model of\r\norganizational effectiveness. In K. Cameron & D. A.\r\nWhetton. Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison\r\nof multiple model. New York: Academic Press.\r\nSheldon, M. E.(1971). Investments and Involvements as\r\nMechanisms Producing Commitment to the\r\nOrganization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, P.110-142 \r\nSigelman, L.(1981). Bureaucratization and organizatonal effectiveness A Double-Dip hypothesis.\r\nAdministration and Society.\r\nSilver, P. F.(1983). Educational Administration: Theoratical\r\nPerspectives on practice and Research. New York:\r\nHapper & Row publishing Co.\r\nSinkiewicz, R. W.(1982). A Comparison of Job Satisfaction of\r\nSpeech Pathologists in Centralizaed Versus\r\nDecentralized School Systems. Dissertation\r\nAbstracts International, 42(09), P. 3832-A.\r\nSmith, K. G., Guthrie, J. P. & Chen, M. J.(1989). Strategy, Size\r\nand performance. Coll Business & Management, U.S.\r\nMaryland, College Park 20742 \r\n, Sousa, D. A. & Hoy W. K. (1981). Bureaucratic structure\r\ninschools: A refinement and synthesis in measurement.\r\nEducational Administration Quarterlty, 17, P.21-40.\r\nSmith, H. R.(1989). The relationship between School Effecti veness\r\nand Elementary Student Achievement in\r\nSouthwest Missouri in Reading and Mathemantics.\r\nUniversity of Arkansas.\r\nStanleg H. U.(1959). `Bureaucracy` and `Rationality` in weber `s\r\nOrganization Theory, American Sociological Review, 24,P.791-795.\r\nStaw, B. M. (1977). Stress Two Side of Commitment. Paper .\r\nPresented at The National Meeting of the Academy\r\nof Management. Orlando, Florida.\r\nStaw, B. M.(1981). The Escalation of Commitment to acourse of\r\nAction. Management Review, 6(4), P.577-587.\r\nSteers, R. M.(1977). Antecedents and Outcomes of\r\nOrganizational commitment. Administrative Science\r\nQuarterly, 22, P.46-56.\r\n~ Steers, R. M.(1977). Organizational Effectiveness: A Behavioral\r\nView. Cal.: Good-Year Publishing Co.\r\nSteers, R. M., Porter, L. W.(1979). Motivation and Work Behavior.\r\nNew York: McGraw-Hill.\r\nStebbins, S. J.(1989). The Influence of Community Service\r\nVoluneer work on Perceptions of Job Satisfaction\r\nand Organizational Commitment among Oregon\r\nEmployees of Pacific Northwest Bell. (Ph. D., Oregon\r\nState University). Dissertation Abstracts Internatonal, 50/06A.\r\nStein, R. & King, B.(1992). Is restructuring a threat to\r\nprincipals` power? NASSP-Bulletin, V76 n540 P.26-31 \r\nSteiner, T. (1986). The Relationships of Females` Sex-Appropriate\r\nOccupational Choices, Work Commitment , and\r\nOrganizational commitment to Selected Demographic\r\nVariables.(Ph. D., Iowa State University). Dissertation\r\nAbstracts International, 47/04A.\r\nStevens, J. M., Beyer, J. M. & Trice, H. M.(1978). Assessing Personal,\r\nRole, and Organizational Predictor of Managerial\r\nCommitment. Academy of Management Journal,\r\n21, P.380-396.\r\nStewart, J. W.(1979). Bureaucratic Structure, Interpersonal Climate\r\nand Student Achievement. Dissertation\r\nAbstracts International. 39(11), P.6457-6458A.\r\nStewart C. P. & Marshall S. S.(1983). Effective Schools: A\r\nReview, The Elementary School Journal, Vol. 83, No.\r\n4, P.427-.452 \r\nStinchcombe, A. 1 (1959). Bureaucratic and Craft\r\nAdministration of Production, Administration Quarterly,\r\n4. P.168-187.\r\nStoner, T. A. &. Freeman, R. E.(1989). Management. New Jersey:\r\nPrentice-Hall, Inc.\r\nTarr, H. C.(1992). The Commitment and Satusfaction of Catholic\r\nSchool Teachers Commitment, Job Satisfaction. The\r\nCatholic University of America.\r\nTeague, M. J.(1991). Teacher satisfaction and involvement in\r\nDecision Making in selected high schools in ohio\r\n(Empowerment). Kent state university.\r\nThapan, M.(1986). Forms of Discourse: typology of teachers and\r\nCommitomen t. Brifish Journal of Socilogy\r\nEducation, Vol 7, No.4, P.415-431 \r\nThompson, V. A.,(1963). Modern Organization New York: Alfred, A, Knopf.\r\nTorres. C., Mcintosh, W. A., & Zey, M.(1991). The Effects of Bureaucratization\r\nand Commitment on Resource\r\nMobilization in Voluntary Organizations. Sociological-Spectrum.\r\nWaters, M.(1989). Collegiality, Bureaucratization, and Professionalization: A Weberian Analysis. American Journal of Sociology.\r\nWayne, K. H. & Cecil, G. M.(1978). Educational Administration:\r\nTheory, Research and Practice. New York: Random House.\r\nWeber, M.(1959). Bureaucracy. in Joseph A. Litterer, ed,\r\nOrganizations. New York: Wiley.\r\nWeber, G.(1971). Inner City Children can be Taught to Read\r\nFour Successful schools. Washington, DC: Council\r\nfor Basic Education. ERIC Ed130243.\r\nWeick, K. E.(1978). Educational Organdzations as Loosely\r\nCoupled Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, P.541-52 \r\nWells, A. S.(1987). Teacher, principal and parent involvement\r\nin the effective school. Ed. P.292-941 \r\nWiener, Y. & Vardi, Y.(1980). Relationships between Job,\r\nOrganization and Career Commitments and Work\r\nOutcomes - An Interactive Approach. Organizational\r\nBehavior and Human Performance, 26, P.81-96.\r\nWiener, Y.(1982). Commitment in Organizations: A Normative\r\nView. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 418-428.\r\nWimpelberg, R. K., Teddlie, C. & Stringfield, S.,(1989). Sensitivity\r\nto Context: The Past and Future of Effective\r\nSchools Research. Educational Administration Quarterly,\r\nVol. 25, NO.1\r\nWinters, 1 1 (1984). A Meta-Analysis of Bureaucratic Structure\r\nand Teacher Job Satisfaction. Dissertation\r\nAbstracts International, 44(11), P.3203-A\r\nWright, P. G.(1991). The Effects of Schools Social Organization\r\non Teachers Feelings of Workplace commitment: A\r\nComparison of teachers (by Racel Ethnicity).\r\nClaremont Graduate School and San Diego Steate University.\r\nYoung, C. T.(1988). An Examination of Selected School Effectiveness Factors as Related to High School Student\r\nPerformance on the Georgia Basic Skills Tests. University\r\nof Georgia.\r\nYuchtman, E., & Seashore, S, E.(1967). A System resource approach\r\nto organizational effectiveness. American\r\nSociological Review, 32, P.891-903.
描述: 博士
國立政治大學
教育學系
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G91NCCV7422012
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.