Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96865


Title: 藝術自主與民族大義:「紀弦為文化漢奸說」新探
Other Titles: Aesthetic Autonomy and National Morality: A New Researtch on “Ji-Xian as a Cultural-Hanjian”
Authors: 劉正忠
Liu, Cheng-Chung
Keywords: 藝術自主;民族大義;文化漢奸;淪陷區;紀弦
Aesthetic Autonomy;National Morality;Cultural-Hanjian;the Japanese occupation;Ji Xian
Date: 2009-06
Issue Date: 2016-05-23 14:54:42 (UTC+8)
Abstract: 本文在相對豐富的文獻基礎上,重新考察紀弦在淪陷區的行為與言談。一方面,試圖驗證所謂文化漢奸的指控是否可以成立,並探討其與詩人的創作有何關聯;另一方面,也想反過來觀察相關指控如何被操作,從而反思漢奸論述的深層意義。在論述過程中,我釐清了現有的指控不精準之處,並補充了若干關鍵材料。此外,又分別考察了紀弦在戰前、戰時、戰後的創作,掘發了一些內心底層的幽微訊息。最後,我提出的結論是,擺脫漢奸觀念的糾葛,則只有特定群體利益的明智計算,或者個體生命意識的深刻省察,而紀弦不能算是明智或深刻。
This article is based on a relatively rich literature, re-explore Ji Xian’s behavior and writing during Japanese Occupation. On the one hand, I attempts to confirm whether the accuse of so-called cultural-hanjian can be established,and discusses what connection there is between the accuse and poetic creation. On the other hand, I also want to observe reversely how the related accuse to be operated, thus I reconsider the meaning of hanjian-discourse in depth. In an elaboration, I try to rectify some unaccurate points in the existing accuse, and add to some information. In addition, I inspect separately Ji Xian’s poetic text in prewar, wartime, and postwar, to find some messages inside his mind. Finally, I propose we break away from the entanglement of hanjian-discourse, then just pay attention to whether one do prudential calculation on community benefit, and profound introspection on individual life, and I think, Ji Xian was not prudential or profound.
Relation: 政大中文學報, 11, 163-198
Bulletin of the Department of Chinese Literature National Chengchi University
Data Type: article
Appears in Collections:[政大中文學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
11(163-198).pdf2846KbAdobe PDF336View/Open


All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


社群 sharing