Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: 從奏議到經義──西漢晚期廟數之爭析論
Other Titles: A Study of the Ancestral Temple Number in the Late Western Han Dynasty
Authors: 張書豪
Chang, Shu-Hao
Keywords: 宗廟;韋玄成;劉歆;鄭玄;王肅
ancestral temple;Wei-Xuan-Cheng;Liu-Xin;Zheng-Xuan;Wang-Su
Date: 2011-06
Issue Date: 2016-05-23 15:48:36 (UTC+8)
Abstract: 本文藉由探討《漢書‧韋玄成傳》的廟制奏議,辨析鄭玄、王肅廟數主張的義理內涵與理論源流。得知王肅的「九廟」說,完全沿襲劉歆禮說;至於鄭玄的「七廟」說,其中「四親廟」實承自永光4年韋玄成的奏疏,而「祖考廟」、「二祧」的定義,則從於劉歆「祖廟」、「宗廟」的分判。再由奏議反映的學術形式觀察,鄭、王兩說僵持不休的癥結,在於雙方論證效力、文獻根據相對等同的狀況下,並沒有任何機制能夠判定,究竟何種詮釋才是真正的周代禮制。而劉歆為了補葺天子禮節的散佚,不惜割裂經傳文字以創發禮例的治學方法,非但挑起許多禮制爭議,亦揭開今、古文經學分裂的序幕。
This article analyzes the theory of the system of the ancestral temple number of Zheng-Xuan (鄭玄) and Wang-Su (王肅) from the palace memorials in Han-Shu (漢書). We know Wang-Su’s hypothesis of Nine Ancestral Temples follows Liu-xin’s (劉歆) etiquette learning, and Zheng-Xuan’s hypothesis of Seven Ancestral Temples follows Wei-Xuan-Cheng’s (韋玄成) and Liu-xin’s etiquette learnings. The article reveals the cause of the arguments between Zheng-Xuan and Wang-Su is that we cannot determine which one is right or wrong in the academic background of Han Dynasty. However, Liu-xin finds a new research method in order to fill the vacancies of the emporers’ etiquette. On the contrary, his behavior provokes the etiquette argument and the cleavage in Confucian classics.
Relation: 政大中文學報, 15, 169-196
Bulletin of the Department of Chinese Literature National Chengchi University
Data Type: article
Appears in Collections:[政大中文學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
15(169-196).pdf2851KbAdobe PDF396View/Open

All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing