Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: A Comparative Analysis of Alternative Evaluation Approaches
Other Titles: 評量方法之分析比較
Authors: 尚惠芳
Keywords: 過程評量法 ; 全面性評量法 ; 非正式主觀評量法
Judgmental model ; Decision-facilitation model ; Naturalistic model
Date: 1997-12
Issue Date: 2016-06-04 14:44:52 (UTC+8)
Abstract: 本篇論文旨在探討與比較現行的幾種評量方法。文中將一一分析過程評量法 (Judgmental Model),全面性評量法 (Decision-Facilitation Model),及非正式主觀評量 法 (Naturalistic Model) 之基本理論及其優缺點。 比較結果顯示,全面性評量法 (Decision-Facilitation Model) 最能夠提供教師及校方主管人員對整個教學與校務發展流 程,有一個清晰明確的架構,以作為改進的依據。
The purpose of this paper is to make a thorough study of three alternative evaluation models which are the judgmental model, the decision-facilitation model, and the naturalistic model. Scriven's goal-free evaluation approach, Stufflebeam's CIPP model, and Stake's responsive evaluation approach will be selected and presented from those alternative evaluation models, respectively. The rationale, strengths, and weaknesses of those three evaluation approaches will be compared and analyzed. By comparison, Stufflebeam's CIPP model is the most useful and helpful evaluation approach in providing program directors and teachers with a clear record-keeping framework regarding how the school program is going.
Relation: 教育與心理研究, 20(下),203-215
Journal of Education & Psychology
Data Type: article
Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat

All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing