從繼受觀點看不完全給付之生成發展

Abstract

一九九九年民法第227條之修正乃日本民法不完全履行理論學說繼受之結果，附隨義務概念之導入主要為一九八○年以後留德學者之貢獻，附隨義務違反構成不完全給付並為最高法院所承認。從給付不完全掌握不完全給付本身，時有其窮。在結果債務，不良給付本身即為不完全給付所謂「未依債務本旨給付」，於其他情形，均為義務違反判斷之問題。

The reform of our law of obligation concerning positive malperformance in Article 227 of the Civil Law Code resulted from the reception of the Japanese doctrine of malperformance. The introduction of ancillary duties after the 1980s is the contribution of a lawyer who graduated from a German university. The violation of the ancillary duties obliged the debtor to damages are recognized by our Supreme Court. Whether there is a positive malperformace, it is insufficient only from the perspective of the insufficiency of performance. Although in the case of the obligation of result, the insufficiency itself matters; in other cases, it is the violation of the duties that counts.