Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98657| 題名: | 國民小學校長空間領導、教師社群運作與學生學習成效關係之研究 A Study on Relationship among the Principals’ Space Leadership, Teacher Community Operation and Student Learning Outcomes in Taiwan’s Elementary School |
作者: | 鐘巧如 Chung, Chiao Ju |
貢獻者: | 湯志民<br>郭昭佑 Tang, Chin Min<br>Guo, Chao Yu 鐘巧如 Chung, Chiao Ju |
關鍵詞: | 校長空間領導 教師社群運作 學生學習成效 Principals’ space leadership Teacher Community Operation Student Learning Outcomes |
日期: | 2016 | 上傳時間: | 1-Jul-2016 | 摘要: | 本研究旨在探討國民小學校長空間領導、教師社群運作與學生學習成效的關聯性。本研究採用問卷調查法，以臺灣地區公立國民小學教育人員為對象，總共發出1,064份問卷，回收1,008份問卷，回收率為94.74%，而有效問卷回收率則為92.20%。正式問卷回收之後，分別以描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關、逐步多元迴歸以及結構方程模式等統計方法加以分析。\r\n\r\n本研究獲得以下八項結論，分述如下：\r\n\r\n一、 國民小學校長空間領導各層面達到高程度表現，在「建構教育空間」、「形塑空間願景」層面表現最突出。\r\n二、 國民小學教師社群運作各層面表現達到高程度表現，以「情感投入」層面最獲肯定。\r\n三、 國民小學學生學習成效各層面表現達到中高程度表現，其中以「學生行為表現」層面最獲認同。\r\n四、 不同背景變項在國民小學校長空間領導、教師社群運作與學生學習成效之差異有其脈絡因素存在。\r\n五、 國民小學校長空間領導、教師社群運作與學生學習成效三者間具有正向關聯。\r\n六、 國民小學校長空間領導及教師社群運作的分層面能預測學生學習成效。\r\n七、 國民小學校長空間領導、教師社群運作與學生學習成效的結構方程模式之適配度評鑑良好，能解釋主要變項間的關係。\r\n八、 國民小學校長空間領導可直接影響學生學習成效，更可間接透過教師社群運作的中介機制，對學生學習成效產生正向影響。\r\n\r\n 最後，根據研究結論，提出相關建議，俾供教育行政主管機關、學校設施規劃設計、學校單位以及後續研究之參考。 The main purpose of this study was to explore the relationship among principals’ space leadership, teacher community operation, and student learning outcomes in Taiwan elementary school. The researcher adopted survey as the main research method. The subjects have been public elementary school educators in Taiwan. 1,064 school staffs were selected to complete the questionnaire, where 1,008 questionnaires were returned. The return rate was 94.74% and the valid rate was 92.20%. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, stepwise regression, and Structural Equation Modeling. Based on the result of the current study, eight research conclusions were generated as follows:\r\n\r\n1. The level of space leadership of principals in the elementary schools is high, and the performance in “constructing educational space” and “molding space vision” are outstanding.\r\n2. The level of teacher community operation is high, and “affective engagement” is certainly the most eligible in the elementary schools.\r\n3. The level of student learning outcomes is medium-performance, and “student behavior” acquired the most recognition in the elementary schools.\r\n4. The differences of the background of principals’ space leadership, teacher community operation, and student learning outcomes have the context factors.\r\n5. The relationships among principals’ space leadership, teacher community operation and student learning outcomes have positive correlations.\r\n6. The sub-level of the principals’ space leadership and teacher community operation can apparently predict the student learning outcomes.\r\n7. The proper fit of structural equation model among principals’ space leadership, teacher community operation and student learning outcomes is assessed as positive and can explain the relationships among main variables.\r\n8. The principals’ space leadership can affect student learning outcomes directly, and which can also affect student learning outcomes positively through teacher community operation.\r\n\r\n Eventually, according to the above conclusions, the research is to provide some recommendations as future references for the educational administration authority, school planners, and elementary schools. |
參考文獻: | 壹、中文部分\r\n丁一顧（2014）。教師專業社群之調查研究：「關注學生學習成效」為觀點。課程與教學季刊，17(1)，209-232。\r\n丁文祺（2008）。國民中學校長教學領導、教師社群互動、教師專業實踐與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。\r\n內政部（2014）。綠建築。綠建築資訊網。取自http://green.abri.gov.tw/\r\n內政部（2015）。智慧綠建築推動方案。智慧綠建築資訊網。取自http://green.abri.gov.tw/\r\n公立國民小學及國民中學委託私人辦理條例（2014年，11月26日）。\r\n尤煌傑、潘小雪（1998）。美學。新北市：國立空中大學。\r\n方慶林（2010）。臺北縣國民小學分散式領導對學生學習態度影響之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n王文科（2002）。教育研究法。臺北市：五南。\r\n王如哲等人編譯（2004）。教育行政研究手冊（J. Murphy, K. Seashore-Louis原編著，1999年出版）。臺北市：心理。\r\n王真麗（2005）。生活課程理論與實務。臺北市：高等教育。\r\n王滿馨（2011）。宜蘭縣國民小學優質教育學校環境規劃圖像之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。\r\n甘育萍（2006）。國民小學校長營造教師社群行為與教師專業社群表現關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學，新北市。\r\n石中英（2006）。哲學視野中的學習成就。教育資料與研究，73，1-9。\r\n江澈（2007）。私立高級中學校長競值領導、教師專業承諾、組織創新與組織效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。\r\n余民寧（2006）。影響學習成就因素的探討。教育資料與研究，73，11-23。\r\n余民寧（2006）。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS 的應用。臺北市：高等教育。\r\n邱皓政（2011）。結構方程模式。臺北市：雙葉書廊。\r\n吳明隆（2007）。SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計。臺北市：\r\n 知城數位科技。\r\n吳明隆（2013）。結構方程模式AMOS的操作與應用。臺北市：五南。\r\n吳勁甫（2008）。競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導行為、學校組織文化與組織效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n吳清山（1988）。追求卓越的教育-學校效能模式初探。師友，225，24-25。\r\n吳清山（1991）。學校行政。臺北市：心理。\r\n吳清山（1998）。學校效能研究（第二版）。臺北市：五南。\r\n吳清山（2000）。學校行政（第七版）。臺北市：心理。\r\n吳清山（2001）。教育品質與績效責任。載於黃德祥主編，教育改革與教育發展（頁85-106）。臺北市：五南。\r\n吳清山（2004）。學校創新經營理念與策略。教師天地，128，30- 44。\r\n吳清山（2013）。空間領導。教育研究月刊，231，125-126。\r\n吳煒增（2015）。臺北市國民小學校園空間美學營造、教師領導與學校特色關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市\r\n吳靜菁（2013）。臺北市國中教師專業學習社群運作關注之研究-以學生學習為焦點（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學，臺北市。\r\n宋鎮照（2000）。團體動力學。臺北市：五南。\r\n李冠霖（2010）。國民小學校長空間領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東縣。\r\n李重毅（2013）。校長分布式領導、教師專業社群運作與學校創新經營效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n李慶裕（2011）。國民中學空間領導指標建構之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立暨南國際大學，南投縣。\r\n杜岐旺（2015）。國民小學校長領導行為影響學生學習成效模式之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。\r\n汪明生、鍾國南（2015）。環境治理與公共事務。臺北市：智勝。\r\n林子倫（2008）。從抗議到審議：台灣環境治理的變遷與挑戰。載於王宏仁、李廣均、龔宜君主編，跨戒：流動與堅持的台灣社會（頁239-260）。臺北市：群學。\r\n林天祐（2005）。優質學校教育指標—學生學習、校園營造與資源統整。載於吳清基等編著，優質學校（頁42-51）。臺北市：臺北市教師研習中心。\r\n林忠仁（2010）。國民小學校長分佈領導、灰猩猩效應與教師專業學習社群關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。\r\n林俊宏譯（2012）。建築為何重要（P.Goldberger原著，2009年出版）。新北市：大家。\r\n林偉文（2002）。國民中小學學校組織文化、教師創意教學潛能與創意教學之關係（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n林勤敏（1990）。校園規劃與美化之探討。載於中華民國學校建築學會主編，當前學校建築基本問題專題研究（頁343-365）。臺北市：臺灣書店。\r\n林瑞昌（2006）。以專業社群概念內涵為核心的教師專業發展策略。載於\r\n 歐用生主編，熱情卓越新典範（頁67-76）。臺北市：國立臺北教育\r\n 大學。\r\n林碧芳（2011）。家庭文化資本與個人學習動機對青少年學習成就影響之貫時研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n林福裕（2014）。公立高中職學校空間運用、本位管理與創新經營模式之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。\r\n林新發（2001）。跨世紀台灣小學教育改革動向：背景、理念與評析。國立臺北師範學院學報，14，75-108。\r\n金尚屏（2008）。高雄市高中職校教師專業社群互動、教學輔導創新與教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。高雄師範大學，高雄市。\r\n孫志麟（2004）。開啟專業學習的新視窗：教師的知識管理。教育研究，126，4-18。\r\n涂宗成（2009）。校園空間改造評估研究—以高雄縣推動新校園空間美學計畫為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。\r\n秦夢群（1992）。高中教師管理心態、學生內外控信念與學生學習習慣與態度關係之研究。教育與心理研究，15，129-172。\r\n秦夢群、濮世緯（2006）。學校創新經營理念與實施之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，2（3），123-150。\r\n秦夢群（2010）。教育領導理論與應用。臺北市：五南。\r\n高級中等以下教育階段非學校型態實驗教育實施條例（2014年，11月19日）。\r\n高博銓（2009）。學校教師學習社群發展的個案研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，2（1），61-74。\r\n國民教育法（2011年，11月30日）。\r\n國家教育研究院（2015）。學習成果指標。取自\r\n http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1314444/\r\n張文馨（2009）。教師評鑑試辦政策下的教師教學效能與學生學習成就之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。\r\n張明輝（2003）。三項管理新議題對學校領導人的啟示。教育研究，11，29-35。\r\n張春興（2000）。教育心理學－三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市：東華。\r\n張新堂（2005）。高級中學知識管理、教師專業成長需求、與組織承諾關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n張德銳（2005）。人際關係與溝通－促進教師專業發展。臺北市：高等教育文化事業。\r\n教育部（2009）。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊（再版）。臺北市：教育部。\r\n教育部（2010）。十二年國民基本教育先導計畫。99年10月21日部授教中（二）字第0990516719號函修訂。\r\n教育部（2011）。教師專業學習社群─領頭羊葵花寶典。臺北市：教育部。\r\n教育部（2013）。教育部美感教育中長程計畫。取自\r\nhttp://www.edu.tw/userfiles/url/20150225102817/%e6%95%99%e8%82%b2%e9%83%a8%e7%be%8e%e6%84%9f%e6%95%99%e8%82%b2%e4%b8%ad%e9%95%b7%e7%a8%8b%e8%a8%88%e7%95%ab.pdf\r\n教育部（2015）。104年度第1次全國教育局(處)長會議-傳承創新‧教育領航。取自http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=1088&Page=26225&wid=ddc91d2b-ace4-4e00-9531-fc7f63364719\r\n教育部（2015）。教育部104年度施政目標與重點。取自http://www.edu.tw/pages/list.aspx?Node=2041&Type=1&Index=4&wid=45a6f039-fcaf-44fe-830e-50882aab1121\r\n教育部重編國語辭典修訂本（2015）。美學。取自http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cgi-bin/newDict/dict.sh?cond=%AC%FC%BE%C7&pieceLen=50&fld=1&cat=&ukey=1889256623&serial=1&recNo=1&op=f&imgFont=1\r\n\r\n教育部國民教育司（1995）。學生行為檢核手冊。臺北市：教育部國民教育司。\r\n教育部統計處（2015）。各級學校概況表。取自 http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=4075&Page=20046&Index=5&WID=31d75a44-efff-4c44-a075-15a9eb7aecdf\r\n莊明達（2012）。國民小學校長空間領導、品牌管理與創新經營關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。 \r\n許德便（2012）。國民中學校長服務領導、教師教學創新、社群互動與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。高雄師範大學，高雄市。\r\n連俊智（2011）。國民小學學校領導社群及其相關因素與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。\r\n郭昭佑（2008）。教育評鑑研究：原罪與解放。臺北市：五南。\r\n郭進隆、齊若蘭譯（2010）。第五項修練-學習型組織的藝術與實務（全新增訂版）（Peter M. Senge原著，2006年出版）。臺北市：天下文化。\r\n郭福豫（2015）。高職校長課程領導、教師專業學習社群與教師教學效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。彰化師範大學，彰化市。\r\n陳木金（2007）。以優質行政管理策略推動優質學校經營，載於臺北市教師研習中心主編，優質領航─行政篇（頁1-25）。臺北市：北市教研中心。\r\n陳木金、溫子欣（2008）。活化校園建築創造空間領導。教育研究，174，60-73。\r\n陳正昌（1994）。北部三縣市家庭教育資源與國小學生學業成就之關係。教育研究，39，37-43。\r\n陳俊瑋（2013）。探究家庭作業與學習成就關係之研究—以TIMSS與TEPS臺灣學生為例（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n陳建志（2013）。國民小學組織內部行銷、知識管理與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n陳威良（2008）。國民小學校長道德領導、學校組織文化與學生學習表現之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。\r\n陳炫佑（2012）。臺中市國民小學校長空間領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。 \r\n陳美如、郭昭佑（2003）。學校本位課程評鑑－理念與實踐反省。臺北市：五南。\r\n陳曼玲（2015）。打造教育創新行動年：教育部部長吳思華以「創新」挑戰臺灣教育。教育研究月刊，258，5-14。\r\n陳琦媛（2001）。學校開放空間設計對教學影響之研究－以臺北市健康、新生和永安國民小學為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n陳瑜芬、劉家樺編（2011）。創新管理。臺中市：滄海。\r\n陳儀玫（2014）。新北市國民中學校長空間領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學，新北市。\r\n陳慶瑞（1991）。國民小學校長領導效能之分析與評鑑-以闡述模式為例。國教天地，90，37-44。\r\n曾怡菁（2014）。教師專業學習社群發展國中學生學習成就評量標準評量示例之行動研究—以綜合活動領域為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。\r\n曾俊凱（2006）。臺灣地區在家自行教育制度規劃與學生學習成效指標建構之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。\r\n曾雅慧（2011）。臺北市國民小學校長空間領導與學校組織氣氛關係之研究。（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n湯志民（1991）。臺北市國民小學學校建築規劃、環境知覺與學生行為之相關研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n湯志民（2000）。學校空間革新的思維──「人―境」互動。載於中華民國學校建築研究學會主編，二十一世紀的學校建築與設施（頁15-62）。臺北市：作者。\r\n湯志民（2006a）。學校建築與校園規畫（第三版）。臺北市：五南。\r\n湯志民（2006b）。臺灣的學校建築（第二版）。臺北市：五南。\r\n湯志民（2008a）。未來學校：學校建築規劃。敎育研究，165， 63-80 。\r\n湯志民（2008b）。空間領導：理念與策略。教育研究，174，18-38。\r\n湯志民（2009a）。教育領導與學校環境。敎育研究，181，16-28。\r\n湯志民（2009b）。空間領導方式之探析。至聖鮮師，65，19-24。\r\n湯志民（2010）。學校建築與規劃：臺灣未來十年的新方向。載於臺北市教育局、中華民國學校建築研究學會編，2010學校建築研究：學校校園建築生態工法（頁9-48）。臺北市：中華民國學校建築研究學會。\r\n湯志民（2011a）。學校空間領導指標建構探析。敎育研究，209，68-84。\r\n湯志民（2011b）。學校建築與規劃：未來10年的新脈絡與新策略。敎育行政研究，1（1），155-186。\r\n湯志民（2012）。臺北市和新北市國民中小學空間領導方式之研究。教育與心理，35（1），1-28。\r\n湯志民（2013）。空間領導：原則與理論基礎。教育行政研究，3（2），1-30。\r\n湯志民（2014）。校園規劃新論。臺北市：五南。\r\n湯志民、魏琦和施佩吟（2013）。國民小學校長空間領導、教師組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究。臺北市：國立政治大學教育學系。（行政院國家科學員會補助專題研究計畫NSC 101-2410-H-004-131）\r\n黃世孟、曾漢珍（1990）。臺灣地區學校建築研究之回顧與分析。載於中華民國學校建築研究學會主編，當前學校建築基本問題專題研究（頁19-54）。臺北市：臺灣書店。\r\n黃世孟（2000）。回歸教育本質的校園美學-談校園戶外教學資源區幾則故事之啟示。載於中華民國學校建築研究學會主編，21世紀的學校建築與設施（頁1-13）。臺北市：德伸文化。\r\n黃玉梅（2000）。國中校長教育領導、教師工作承諾與學校教育成效關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n黃玉英（2004）。臺北市公立國民中學學校建築規劃現況與學生學業成就之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n黃天助（2011）。高職教師知覺校長轉型領導、組織創新氣氛對創新經營成效影響之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。\r\n黃秀霞（2013）。公立高中校長教學領導、教師社群互動、學校創新氣氛與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。\r\n黃芳銘（2004）。結構方程模式理論與應用（修訂版）。臺北市：五南。\r\n黃郁倫譯（2014）。學習革命的願景學習共同體的設計與實踐（佐藤學原著，2014年出版）。臺北市：遠見天下。\r\n黃冠達、張純和幸曼玲（2015）。國小教師參與閱讀理解教學實踐社群與其專業成長之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，11（1），57-80。DOI 10.3966/181665042015031101003\r\n黃建皓（2012）。建構與驗證有效預測臺灣學生學業成就的三階層模式－階層線性模式之分析（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。\r\n黃秋鑾（2009）。臺灣地區國民中學校長知識領導、學習社群與學校創新經營效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。\r\n黃哲彬（2011）。國民中學校長賦權增能領導行為、組織創新經營與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n黃國庭（2014）。國民小學校長空間領導、學校創新經營與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n黃耀榮（1990）。國民小學學校建築計畫與設計問題之調查研究。臺北市：內政部建築研究所籌備處編輯委員會。\r\n新北市政府教育局（2015）。新北市105學年度下學期至109學年度上學期國民中小學第二週期校務評鑑實施計畫。新北市政府教育局2015年4月23日新北教研字第1040686580號函。 \r\n楊念湘（2011）。國民小學校長混合教練、師傅教導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n楊振富譯（2002）。學習型學校：第五項修練教育篇（下）（P. M. Senge, N. Cambron-McCabe, T. Lucas, B. Smith, J. Dutton和A. Kleiner原著， 2000年出版）。臺北市：天下遠見。\r\n楊國樞（1971）。從心理學的觀點談學校建築的問題。教育文摘，16（11），6-8。\r\n楊淙富（2012）。國民小學教師領導、教師專業學習社群與學校效能之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。\r\n楊智先（2007）。教師社群互動、工作希望感受與創造性轉化之關係：量化模式建構與典範案例分析（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n楊賢智、李景錕、廖延梅（2001）。環境管理學。臺北市：科技圖書。\r\n楊憲明（2006）。認知能力、認知歷程與學習成就關係探究。教育資料與研究，73，25-40。\r\n萬新知（2009）。國民小學學校建築美學之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n葉連祺（2011）。教育領導研究突破之初步思考。載於臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所等主辦之「建國百年教育行政與評鑑：挑戰與展望」學術研討會會議手冊暨論文集（頁477-1~477-20）。臺北市：臺北市立教育大學。\r\n詹紹威（2014）。臺灣高級中學校園創意建築美學表現之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。\r\n\r\n廖文靜（2011）。學校設施品質與教育成果關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n廖品蘭（2014）。東部國小教師社群運作知覺及心理增能賦權關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立東華大學，花蓮縣。\r\n臺北市優質學校資源網（2015）。臺北市104年度優質學校卓越經營研討會:各向度指標評審標準及學校參考做法。取自http://tpqs.tp.edu.tw/comm/DocView.aspx?S=YER20140821143643MV4&CDE=DOC20151028153355KQB\r\n趙家麟（1998）。校園規劃的時空觀―普林斯頓大學廿百五十年校園發展的探討與省思〔1746－1996〕。臺北市：田園城市。\r\n齊若蘭譯（2013）。第五項修練Ⅱ實踐篇（下）－共創學習新經驗（第二版）（Peter M. Senge原著，1994年出版）。臺北市：天下文化。\r\n劉秀枝（2012）。幼兒園教保服務人員社群互動、職場希望感與創新教學關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。\r\n劉侑承（2013）。桃園縣國民小學校長空間領導與學校效能相關之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n劉恆昌（2015）。「領導場域」的實作邏輯： 一所高中校本課程發展的個案研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。\r\n劉國寄（2014）。馬來西亞獨中教師專業學習社群及其對學生學習影響之行動研究——以作文教學為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。 \r\n歐用生（1996）。教師專業成長。臺北市：師大書苑。\r\n潘正德（2012）。團體動力學（第三版）。臺北市：心理出版社。\r\n蔡保田（1977）。學校建築學。臺北市：臺灣商務印書館。\r\n蔡保田（1984）。校舍設計之基本原理。載於蔡保田主編，學校建築研究（頁8-26）。臺北市：臺灣商務印書館。\r\n蔡保田、李政隆、林萬義、湯志民和謝明旺（1984）。臺北市立學校建築設施功能與發展趨勢之評估，市政建設專輯研究報告，第101輯。臺北市：臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會。\r\n蔡進雄（2003）。學校領導的新思維：建立教師學習社群。技術及職業教育，78，42-46。\r\n蔡翠菱（2013）。我國八年級學生在歷屆TIMSS調查中科學學習成就與學生特質（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。\r\n鄭燕祥（2001）。學校效能及校本管理：發展的機制。臺北市：心理。\r\n鄭女玲（2011）。空間領導在本土教育課程發展之行動研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東縣。\r\n鄭采珮（2011）。國民小學校長教學領導與學生學習成就之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。\r\n鄭文淵（2014）。國民中學校長空間領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\r\n學校型態實驗教育實施條例（2014年，11月19日）。\r\n戴源甫（2008）。從家庭背景、學習態度、與學習成就之相關性－結構方程模式之分析途徑進行探究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。\r\n環境教育法（2010年，6月5日）。\r\n謝文全（2004）。教育行政學（第二版）。臺北市：高等教育。\r\n鍾明芬（2009）。影響學生學習成效關鍵成功因素之彙總分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。\r\n簡杏娟、賴志峰（2014）。國民小學教師領導促進專業學習社群建構之個案研究。學校行政，90，172-193。\r\n簡惠閔、高家斌（2007）。提升學校效能之具體策略─學習型學校的觀點。教育資料與研究雙月刊，79，155-168。\r\n羅虞村（1986）。領導理論研究。臺北市：五南。\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n \r\n貳、英文部分 \r\nAfuah, A. (1998). Innovation management: Strategies, implementation, and profits. New York: Oxford University Press.\r\nAhoy, C. K. (2007). Leadership in educational facilities administration. Chicago, IL: The Association of Physical Plant Administrators.\r\nAl-Safran, E., Brown, D., & Wiseman, A. (2014).The effect of principal’s leadership style on school environment and outcome. Journal of Research in Higher Education Journal, 22, 1-19.\r\nAltbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2010). Tracking a global academic revolution.Change Magazine, 42(2), 30-39.\r\nAndersen, S. (1999).The relationship between school design variables and scores on the lowa test of basic skills. Athens, GA.:University of Georgia.\r\nBarley, Z. A., & Beesley, A. D. (2007). Rural school success: what can we learn? Journal of Research in Rural Education, 22(1), 1-16.\r\nBarr, S. K., Cross, J. E., & Dunbar B. H. (2015).The whole-school sustainability framework. Retrieved from http://centerforgreenschools.org/sites/default/files/resource-files/Whole-School_Sustainability_Framework.pdf\r\nBarth, R. S. (2006). Improving relationships within the schoolhouse. Educational Leadership, 63(6), 8-13.\r\nBeiser, F. C. (1993). The cambridge companion to Hegel. New York, NY: Cambridge University.\r\nBennis, W. (1994). On becoming a leader (2th ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley. \r\nBerlinger-Gustafson, C. (2004). Building professional learning communities. In Cathy Berling-Gustafson, In support of the Florida Professional Development System Evaluation Protocol. Retrieved from http://www.teachinflorida.com/Portals/0/Documents/Learning%20Communities.pdf\r\nBlair, L. (1998).¨TAP¨ping into technology. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory News, 10(4), 12-13.\r\nBlankstien, A. M. (2010). Failure is not an option. California: Corwin.\r\nBloom, B. S. (Ed). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: Longman.\r\nBosworth, D. (1994). Truancy and pupil performance. Education Economics, 2(3), 243-264.\r\nBranch, G., Hanushek, E., & Rivkin, S. (2012).Estimating the effect of leasers on public sector productivity: The case of school principals (NBER Working Paper No. 17803). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w17803.pdf\r\nBrem, A. & Eric, V. (2013). Evolution of innovation management: Trends in an international context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137299994\r\nBrockmeier, L. L., Starr, G., Green, R., Pate, J. L., & Leech D. W. (2013). Principal and school-level effects on elementary school student achievement. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 8(1), 49-61.\r\nBryk, A. S., & Driscoll, M. E. (1988). The high school as community: Contextual differences and consequences for students and teachers. WI: National Centre on Effective Secondary Schools, University of Wisconsin-Madison.\r\nBryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organization. London: Sage.\r\nBush, T. (2011). Theories of educational leadership & management. (4th ed.). London: Sage.\r\nCash, C. S.(1993). A study of the relationship between school building condition and student achievement and behavior(Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.\r\nCastaldi, B. (1987). Educational facilities: Planning, modernization, and management (3th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.\r\nCastaldi, B. (1994). Educational facilities: Planning, modernization, and management (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.\r\nCarroll, J. M. (1994). The copernican plan evaluated: The evolution of a revoluation. Topsfield, MA: Copernican Associates.\r\nCentra, J. A., & Potter, D. A. (1980). School and teacher effects: An interrelational model. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 273-291.\r\nChrispeels, J. (2004). Learning to lead together: The promise and challenge of sharing leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\r\nChristopher, D., & Kenneth, L. (2007). Successful principal leadership in times of change: An international perspective. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.\r\nClement, M., & Vandenberghe, R. (2001). How school leaders can promote teachers’professional development: An account from the field. School Leadership & Management, 21(1), 43-57.\r\nCoenen, C., Alexander, K., & Kok, H. (2013). Facility management value dimensions from a demand perspective. Journal of Facilities Management. 11(4), 339-353.\r\nCrowan, D. F. (2010). The professional teaching and learning cycle. In K. K. Hipp & J. B. Huffman (Eds.), Demystifying professional learning communities: School leadership at its best (pp.57- 68). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.\r\nDargo-Severson, E. (2004). Leading in the 21st century.In E. Dargo-Severson (Ed.), Helping teachers learn (pp.163-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Crowin.\r\nDaly, A. J. (2009).Rigid response in an age of accountability: The potential of leadership and trust. Educational Administration Quterly, 45(2), 168-216. doi:10.1177/0013161X08330499\r\nDepartment of Education and Early Childhood Development (2011). Research into the connection between built learning spaces and student outcomes. East Melbourne: DEECD.\r\nDimmock, C. (2012). Leadership, capacity building and school improvement: Concepts, themes and impact. New York: Routledge.\r\nDuFour, R., & Eaker, R. E. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, ID: National Educational Service, ASCD.\r\nDuke, L. D., Tucker, D. P., Higgins, J., Lanphear, L., Levy, K. M., & Salmonowicz, J. M. (2008). Are local policies supporting instruction becoming standardized? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7(1), 1-29.\r\nEDUCAUSE. (2015). Learning space design. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ELI/LearningPrinciplesandPractices/LearningSpaceDesign/5521?bhcp=1\r\nFanning, R. H. (2003). Sustainable design: A new standard. School Planning & Management, 42(5),12-14.\r\nFisher, B. A., & Ellis, D. G. (1990). Small group decision making: Communication and the group process (3th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.\r\nFlórez, M. T., & Sammons, P. (2013). Assessment for learning: Effects and impact. Retrieved from http://www.cfbt.com/~/media/cfbtcorporate/files/research/2013/r-assessment-for-learning-2013.pdf\r\nFraser, K. (2014).Facilities management: The strategic selection of a maintenance system. Journal of Facilities Management, 12(1), 18 – 37.\r\nFullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.\r\nFullan, M. (2005). Leadership & sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.\r\nGreenlee, B. J., & Karanxha, Z. (2010). A study of group dynamics in educational leadership cohort and non-cohort groups. Journal of Research on Leadership Education,5, 357-382.\r\nGreenwald, R., L. V. Hedges, & R. D. Laine (1996).The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66 (3), 361-396.\r\nGrint, K. (2005). Leadership: Limits and possibilities. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.\r\nGrossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942-1012.\r\nHallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal`s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44. doi:10.1177/0013161X96032001002\r\nHallinger, P., L. Bickman, & K. Davis. (1996). School context, principal leadership and student achievement. Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 498-518. \r\nHallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980－1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157-191.\r\nHallinger, P. (2008, March) Methodologies for studying school leadership: A review of 25 years of research using the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New York.\r\nHallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30(2), 95-110.\r\nHallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011). Leadership and student learning outcomes. In J. Robertson & H. Timperley (Eds.), Leadership and learning (pp. 56-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\r\nHarris, W. L. (2015). Facility matters: The perception of academic deans regarding the role of facilities in higher education. Facilities Management, 31(5), 32-37.\r\nHattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.\r\n\r\nHeck, R. H. (2000). Examining the impact of school quality on school outcomes and improvement: A value-added approach. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(2), 513-552. doi:10.1177/00131610021969092\r\nHess, A. G. (1999). Understanding achievement changes under Chicago school reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 67-83.\r\nHipp, K. K., & Huffman, J. B. (2010).Demystifying the concept of professional learning communities. In K. K. Hipp & J. B. Huffman (Eds.), Demystifying professional learning communities: School leadership at its best (pp. 11-21). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.\r\nHolland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. (2th ed.). Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall.\r\nHopland, A. O. (2013). School facilities and student achievement in industrial countries: Evidence from the TIMSS. International Education Studies, 6(3), 162-171.doi:10.5539/ies.v6n3p162\r\nHord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 410 659)\r\nHord, S. M., & Sommers, W.A. (2008). Leading professional learning communities: Voices from research and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.\r\nHoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice (9th ed.). New York, N.Y.: Random House.\r\nHu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118\r\nHubler, G.(1997).Becoming a voice in school facilities design: Taking the lead. School in the Middle, 7(2), 28-31.\r\nHuffman, J. B. (2001). The role of shared values and vision in creating professional learning communities. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED466028)\r\nHuffman, J. B. & Hipp, K. K. (2010). Methodology and Conceptual Framework. In K. K. Hipp & J. B. Huffman (Eds.), Demystifying professional learning communities: School leadership at its best (pp.23-28). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.\r\nJonas, H., Olof, J., & Ander, O. (2007).Successful principalship-the Swedish case. In Christopher, D., & Kenneth, L. (Eds.), Successful principal leadership in times of change: An international perspective (pp.87-102). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.\r\nJones, L., Stall, G., & Yarbrough, D. (2013). The importance of professional learning communities for school improvement. Creative Education, 4, 357-361. doi 10.4236/ce.2013.45052.\r\nKemp, L. (2010).Teaching & learning for international students in a \"learning community\": Creating, sharing and building knowledge. A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 5, 63-74.\r\nKgaile, A., & Morrison, K. (2006). Measuring and targeting internal conditions for school effectiveness in the free state of South Africa. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34(1), 47-68.\r\nKlokgieters, K., & Chu, R. (2013). Creating an environment for successful innovation: A management consultant’s perspective. In Brem, A. & Eric, V. (Eds.), Evolution of innovation management: Trends in an international context (pp.327-348). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.\r\nKim, U. & Yang, J. (2015). A study on the process development of collective intelligence for utilization of unused space of abandoned schools. Proceedings of 11th International Conference Mobile Learning 2015,153-156.\r\nKok, H., Mobach, M., & Omta, O. (2011).The added value of facility management in the educational environment. Journal of Facilities Management, 9 (4), 249-265.\r\nKotter, J. P. (1990). A force for change: How leadership differs from management. New York: Free Press.\r\nKythreotis, A., & Pashiardis, P.(1998).The influence of school leadership styles and culture on students’ achievement in Cyprus primary schools. Nicosia: University of Cyprus.\r\nKyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P.M., Antoniou, P., Demetriou, D., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2015). The impact of school policy and stakeholders` actions on student learning:a longitudinal study. Learning and Instruction, 36, 113-124.\r\nLackney, J. A. (1994). Educational facilities: The impact and role of the physical environment of the school on teaching, learning and educational outcomes. Milwaukee, WI: CAUPR.\r\nLackney, J. A. (1999). Assessing school facilities for learning/ assessing the impact of the physical environment on the educational process. Mississippi State, MI: Educational Design Institute. (ED441330)\r\nLam, A. K. (2005). The human element in building performance evaluation. In W. F. E. Preiser & J. C. Vischer (Eds.), Assessing Building Performance (pp. 188-198). UK: Arch Press.\r\nLave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate periperal participation.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.\r\nLeithwood, K. A., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.\r\nLeithwood, K., & Duke, D. (1999). A century’s quest to understand school leadership. In J. Murphy & Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2th ed.)(pp.45-72). Washington, D. C.: American Educational Research Association.\r\nLeithwood, K. (2001). School leadership in the context of accountability policies. International Journal Leadership in Education, 4(3), 217-235.\r\nLeithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom. K. (2004). Review of research how leadership influences student learning. Minneapolis, MN; Toronto, Ontario; New York, NY: CAREI, OISE/UT, The Wallace Foundation.\r\nLeithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly,44(4), 496-528.doi:10.1177/0013161X08321501\r\nLeithwood, K., & Mascall, B. (2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 529-561. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321221\r\nLeithwood, K., & Wahlstrom, K. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning introduction. Educational Administration Quarterly,44(4),455-457. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321495\r\nLeithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D.(2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management,28(1),27-42.doi:10.1080/13632430701800060\r\nLemasters, L. K. (1997). A synthesis of studies pertaining to facilities, student achievement, and student behavior. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic and State University. (ED447687)\r\nLevine, D.U., & Lezotte, L.W. (1990). Unusually effective schools : A review and analysis of research and practice. Madsion, WI: National Center for Effective School Research and Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 330032)\r\nLiang, J. G., & Sandmann, L. R. (2015).Leadership for community engagement—a distributed leadership perspective. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 19(1), 35-63.\r\nLiebman, H., Maldonado, N., Lacey, C. H., & Thompson, S. (2005, November). An investigation of leadership in a professional learning community: A case study of a large, suburban, public middle school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Florida Educational Research Assocaition, Miami, FL.\r\nLiu, Y., Loi, R., & Lam, L.W. (2011). Linking organizational identification and employee performance in teams: The moderating role of team-member exchange. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(15), 3187-3201. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2011.560875\r\nLouis, K. S., & Kruse, S. D. (1995). Professionalism and community : Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.\r\nLouis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring school. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757-798.\r\nMael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater : A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.\r\nMarks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370-397. doi:10.1177/0013161X03253412\r\nMarsick, V.J. & Watkins, K.E. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.\r\nMarzano, R. J. (2003).What works in school: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.\r\nMarzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.\r\nMathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2006). Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27,1031-1056.\r\nMatthew, A. K., & John P. P. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development ? explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience. Education Evaluation and policy Analysis,36(4),476-500.doi:10.3102/0162373713519496\r\nMaxwell, L. E. (1999). School building renovation and student performance: One district’s experience. Scottsdale, Ariz.:Council of Educational Facility Planners, International.(ED443272)\r\nMcAndrew, F. T. (1993). Environmental psychology. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.\r\nMitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2001). Professional improvement: Building capacity for a learning community. Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger.\r\nMorgan, H. (1996). An analysis of gardner’s theory of multiple intelligence. Roeper Review, 18(4), 263-269.\r\nMulford, W., Silins, H., & Leithwood, K. (2004). Educational leadership for organisational learning and improved student outcomes. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.\r\nMulford, B. (2007).Successful School Principal in Tasmania. In Christopher, D., & Kenneth, L. (Eds.), Successful principal leadership in times of change: An International perspective (pp.17-38). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.\r\nNational Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.\r\nNettles, S. M., & Herrington, C. (2007). Revisiting the importance of the direct effects of school leadership on student achievement: The implications for school improvement policy. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(4), 724-736.\r\nNonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H.(1995).The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University.\r\nNorthouse, P. G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\r\nOECD (1991).The nature of innovation and the evolution of the productive system. In OECD (Ed.), Technology and Productivity - The Challenge for Economic Policy (pp.303-314). Paris: OECD.\r\nOECD (2011a). OECD looking back over 50 years of educational buildings. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264112308-3-en\r\n\r\nOECD (2011b). Learning environments for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264112308-4-en\r\n\r\nOECD (2011c).Transforming spaces for learning. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264112308-5-en\r\nOECD (2011d). School building rehabilitation: Thinking strategically towards excellence. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264112308-6-en\r\n\r\nOlivier, D. F., & Hipp, K. K. (2010). Assessing and analyzing schools as professional learning communities. In K. K. Hipp & J. B. Huffman (Eds.), Demystifying professional learning communities: School leadership at its best (pp.29-43). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.\r\nO`Neill, D.J., & Oates,A.D.(2002).The impact of school facilities on student achievement, behavior, attendance, and teacher turnover rate in central Text middle schools. The Educational Facility Planner, 36(3), 14-22.\r\nOwens, R. G., & Steinhoff, C. R. (1976). Administering change in schools. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.\r\nOwens, R. G., & Valesky, T. C. (2011). Organizational behavior in education. (9th ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.\r\nPaolini, A. (2015). Enhancing teaching effectiveness and student learning outcomes. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 20-33.\r\nPearce, C.L., Sims, H. P.,JR., Cox, J. F., Ball, G., Schnell E., Smith, K. A., & Trevino, L.,(2003). Transactors, transformers and beyond: A multi‐method development of a theoretical typology of leadership. Journal of Management Development 22(4), 273-307. doi:10.1108/02621710310467587\r\nPorter, A. C. (1987). Teacher collaboration:New partnerships to attack old problems. Phi Delta Kappan, 69 (2), 147–152.\r\nPorter, M. (1985).Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY. ,The Free Press.\r\nPricewaterhouseCoopers. (2001). Building performance: An empirical analysis of the relationship between school’s capital investment and pupil performance. United Kingdom: Department for Education and Employment.\r\nQureshi, I., & Compeau, D. (2009). Assessing between-group differences in information systems research: A comparison of covariance - and component-based SEM. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 197-214.\r\nRaygor, A. L., & Wark, D. M. (1970). Systems for study. New York: McGraw-Hill.\r\nReimer, B. (1978). Education for aesthetic awareness: The cleveland area project. Music Educators Journal, 64 (6), 66-69.\r\nReynolds, D., Hopkins, D., &; Stoll, L. (1993). Linking school effectiveness knowledge and school improvement practice: Towards a synergy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4(1), 37-58.\r\nReynolds, D., & Teddlie, C. (2000). The future agenda for school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp.322-343). New York : Falmer Press.\r\nReynolds, D., Sammons, P., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., Townsend, T.,& Teddlie, C. (2014). Educational effectiveness research (EER): a state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 197-230.\r\nRoberts, M. S., & Pruitt, Z. E. (2003).School as professional learning communities: Collaborative activities and strategies for professional development. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.\r\nRobinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A.,& Rowe K. J. (2008).The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674.doi: 10.1177/0013161X08321509\r\nRogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusions of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.\r\nRoss, J.A., & Gray, P. (2006).School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education, 29 (3), 798-822.\r\nRost, J. (1991). Leadership for the twenty-first century. New York: Praeger.\r\nRudd, P., Reed, F.,& Smith, P. (2008). The effects of the school environment on young people`s attitudes towards education and learning. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research. Retrieved November 9, 2015, from http://www.nfer.ac.uk/nfer/publications/BSY01/BSY01.pdf\r\nSalganik, L. (1996). Apples and apples: Comparing performance indicators for places with similar demographic characteristics. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 16(2), 125-142.\r\nSanoff, H. (2002). School designed with community participation. Retrived from http://www.ncef.org/pubs/sanoffschools.pdf\r\nSattler, M. (2011). Excellence in innovation management: Ameta-analytic review on the predictors of innovation performance. Wiesbaden: Gabler.\r\nScheerens, J., & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford: Elsevier Science\r\nScheerens, J. (2001). Monitoring school effectiveness in developing countries. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(4), 359-384.\r\nSchleicher, A. (ed.) (2012), Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century: Lessons from around the world.OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264174559-en\r\nSchmoker, M. (2006). Results now: How we can achieve unprecedented improvements in teaching and learning. Alexandra, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.\r\nSchneider, M. (2002). Do school facilities affect academic outcomes？ Retrieved from www.edspaces.org/pubs/outcomes.pdf.\r\n\r\nSchneider, M. (2004). Public school facilities and teaching: Washington, D. C. and Chicago. Twenty-First Century School Fund, Washington, D. C. \r\nSchussler, D. L. (2003). Schools as learning communities: Unpacking the concept. Journal of School Leadership, 13, 498-528.\r\nScribner, J. P., Cockrell, K. S., Cockrell, D. H., & Valentine, J. W. (1999). Creating professional communities in schools through organizational learning: An evaluation of a school improvement process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 130-160.\r\nSebastian, J., & Allensworth, E. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A case study mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 626-663.doi:10.1177/0013161X11436273\r\nSenge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: John Wiely &; Sons Inc.\r\nSergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral leadership. San Francisco：Jossey-Bass.\r\nSergiovanni, T. J. (2007). Rethinking leadership: A collection of articles (2th ed.). California：Corwin press.\r\nShavelson, R. J., L. M. McDonnell., & J. Oakes (Eds). (1989). Indicators for monitoring mathematics and science education: A sourcebook. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. This article was adapted from material appearing in the sourcebook.\r\nSitzmann, T. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64, 489–528.\r\nSmith, W. A., & Anderews, R. L. (1989). Instructional leadership: How principals make a difference. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.\r\nStevenson, K. R. (2010). Educational trends shaping school planning, design, construction, funding and operation. Washington, D.C.: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities\r\nStronge, J. H., Richard, H. B., & Catano, N. (2008). Qualities of effective principals. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.\r\nTanner, C. K., & Lackney, J. A. (2006). Educational facilities planning: Leadership, architecture, and management. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.\r\nTaylor, A., & Enggass, K. (2009). Linking architecture and education: Sustainable design of learning environments. NM: University of New Mexico Press. \r\nTen Dam, G., & Blom, S. (2006). Learning through participation: The potential of school-based teacher education for developing a professional identity. Teaching and teacher education, 22, 647-660.\r\nTesta, K. (2002). Joint-use school facility agreement strengthen school communities. The Educational Facility Planner, 36(3), 11-13.\r\nThe Association of Physical Plant Administrators (2015). Leadership in educational facilities. Retrieved from http://www.appa.org/\r\nThe U. S. Green Building Council (2015). Green schools are better for learning: the center for green schools. Retrived from http://centerforgreenschools.org/green-schools-are-better-learning.\r\nTönnies, F. (1957). Community and society (C. Loomies, Trans.). NJ: Transaction Inc., New Brunswick. (Original work published 1887).\r\nTrott, P. (2011). Innovation management and new product development (5th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. \r\nTurner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: theory and research in organizational behavior (pp.77-122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.\r\nTurner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.\r\nUhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 654–676.\r\nVygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Boston: Harvard University Press.\r\nWahlstrom, K. L. (2008). Leadership and learning: What these articles tell us. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 593-597. doi: 10.1177/0013161X08321494\r\nWahlstrom, K. L., Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., & Anderson, S. (2005). How leadership influences student learning. New York: Wallace Foundation.\r\nWahlstrom, K. L., Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., & Anderson, S. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Executive summary of research findings. Retrieved from http://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/140884/Executive%20Summary%20Report-Web%20%282%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y\r\nWalberg, H. J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America’s schools. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 19-27.\r\nWallace Foundation. (2013). The school principal as leader: Guiding schools to better teaching and learning. The Wallace Foundation. Retrieved from www.wallacefoundation.org\r\n\r\nWallace, R. C., Engel, D. E., & Mooney, J. E. (1997). The learning school: A guide to vision-based leadership. London: Corwin Press.\r\nWang, S. T., & Chen, C. C. (2015). Path analysis on the factors influencing learning outcome for hospitality interns–from the flow theory perspective. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(3), 25-44. doi:10.5539/jel.v4n3p25\r\nWatkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.\r\nWeathers, J. M. (2011). Teacher community in urban elementary schools: The role of leadership and bureaucratic accountability. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(3), 5-29. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ913490 )\r\nWeinstein, C. S. (1979). The physical environment of the school: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 49(4), 577-610.\r\nWenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. NY: Cambridge University Press.\r\nWenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of Practice. Boston, M A.: Harvard Business School Press.\r\nWenger, E. (2006). Communities of practice-a brief introduction. Retrieved from http://www.ewenger.com/research/\r\nWestheimer, J. (1999). Communities and consequences: An inquiry into ideology and practice in teachers` professional work. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 71-105.\r\nWheatley, M. (2005). Finding our way : Leadership for an uncertain time. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publisher.\r\nWinters, E. (2007). Aesthetics & architecture. London: MPG Books.\r\nWitziers, B., Bosker, R. J., & Krüger, M. L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 398-425. doi:10.1177/0013161X03253411\r\nWoolner, P., Hall, E., Higgins, S., McCaughey, C., & Wall, K. (2007). A sound foundation? what we know about the impact of environments on learning and the implications for building schools for the future. Oxford Review of Education, 33(1), 47-70.\r\nWoolner, P. (2010). The design of learning spaces. London: Continuum.\r\nZabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2013). Can SMEs in traditional industries be creative? In Brem, A. & Eric, V. (Eds.), Evolution of innovation management: Trends in an international context (pp.75-95). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. \r\n\r\n | 描述: | 博士 國立政治大學 教育學系 97152511 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097152511 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html | 115 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.