Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98677| 題名: | 閱讀文學之教學初探:台灣雙語學生批判思考之行動研究 Teaching Critical Thinking with Literature: An Action Research in a Bilingual Context in Taiwan |
作者: | 陳宇欣 | 貢獻者: | 劉怡君 陳宇欣 |
關鍵詞: | 行動研究 批判思考 文學 雙語 蘇格拉底式提問法 action research critical thinking literature bilingual Socratic Questioning |
日期: | 2016 | 上傳時間: | 1-Jul-2016 | 摘要: | 本論文以行動研究方式，探討一所台灣雙語學校英語為外語(EFL)學生，在接受為期四十週的英語文學課程期間，哪些教學策略最能激發其做批判思考。研究的對象為二十一位七年級的學生，按其CEF語言分級結果，九位為中高級程度，十二位為中級。除探討教學策略的成效，亦分析這些策略對於兩組英語程度和學習背景(有雙語教育背景及無雙語教育背景)相異的學生分別所產生的作用。透過行動研究的步驟―亦為開發、實施、檢討、修正―以及五階段的學生學習成果分析，教師—研究者不斷調整其教學策略來回應學生學習上的需求。\n本論文所探討之研究問題為三：(一)哪些文學課程的教學策略最能激發所有研究對象做批判思考？(二)根據問題一，有雙語教育背景及無雙語教育背景的研究對象分別受哪一教學策略刺激最多？ (三)透過文學教學，兩組研究對象分別在哪些批判思考項目表現最有進步空間？\n教師—研究者以Ennis的批判思考評分表為基礎做修正，並以此評分表比較分析實驗對象之前測、學習單、與批判思考紙筆回應。根據資料與教師實際觀察，鷹架理論、蘇格拉底式提問法、舉證、自身實例、創意思考與溝通式教學最能激發學生產生批判思考，而所有研究對象無論其語言程度或學習背景如何，皆能表現出批判思考的技能。不過，就情意上，中高級有雙語教育背景的學生較習慣於開放性的思辯與討論過程，而中級無雙語教育背景的學生則因自身的語言及西方文化認識的限制而需要適應與協助。 This study had been conducted in a seventh-grade bilingual classroom of nine high-intermediate and twelve intermediate English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students over forty weeks in Taiwan. The aim of the study was to seek strategies that would best help stimulate students’ critical thinking (CT) skills through the teaching of literature, and how those strategies affected the learning results of the two groups of participants with different language proficiency levels and prior education experiences (EFL bilingual context vs. EFL non-bilingual context). The teacher-researcher had adopted the developing, implementing, reflecting, and modifying steps of an action-research framework, and through analyzing students’ learning results in the 5 reflecting Stages, modified tasks and pedagogies were implemented right away to address students’ learning needs. Three questions anticipated responses from the study, which were: “What teaching strategies can stimulate all the participants’ critical thinking skills through literature?”, “Based on Question 1, which strategy is the most CT-stimulating for the bilingual group and which for the non-bilingual group?” and “Through literature study, which CT skills are the most-improved for the bilingual and the non-bilingual group?” In answering the questions, students’ pretest, weekly worksheets, and CT written responses were evaluated against the teacher-researcher’s self-created CT rubric adapted from Ennis’ version in every Stage for further lesson modification. Based on these data, 6 teaching strategies were proved to be CT-stimulating, which were: scaffolding, Socratic Questioning, evidence of proof, making personal connections, thinking outside the box, and adopting the Communicative Approach. All the participants were able to perform an amount of CT skills regardless of their language proficiency levels or learning backgrounds; however, in terms of CT dispositions, the high-intermediate bilingual participants feel more comfortable expressing their ideas openly, and the intermediate non-bilingual ones were influenced by their own linguistic and cultural limitations. |
參考文獻: | References\nAlbert, R. T. & Albert, R. E. & Radsma, J. (2002). Relationships among bilingualism, critical thinking ability, and critical thinking disposition. Journal of Professional Nursing, 18 (4), 220-229.\nAlbom, M. (2003). The Five People You Meet in Heaven. New York: Hyperion Books.\nAl-Shalabi, N., Neimneh, S., Omary, K., Shureteh, H., & Abu-Joudeh, M. (2012). Integreting critical thinking into American literature classes. Cross-Cultural Communication, 8 (2), 40-43.\nAlvarado-Boyd, S. (2006). Exploring and situating the experience of learning to think critically: A case study highlighting the student voice. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.\nAtkinson, D. (1997). A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL. TESOL QUARTERLY, 31, 71-94.\nAvison, D., Lau, F., Myers, M., & Nielsen, P. A. (1999). Action Research. Communications of the ACM, 42 (1), 94.\nBarke, E. M., & Perry-Williams, D. E. (1938). A further study of the comparative intelligence of children in certain bilingual and monoglot schools in South Wales. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 8, 63-77.\nBlau, S. D. (2003). The Literature Workshop: Teaching Texts and Their Readers. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.\nBooth, W. (1988). The Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.\nBrophy, J. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51, 5-32.\nBurroughs, Robert. (1993). Research says literature CAN teach critical thinking. The Education Digest, Nov, 59, 3.\nCalvert, M., & Sheen, Y. (2014). Task-based language learning and teaching: An action-research study. Language Teaching Research,19 (2), 226-244.\nCameron, J. (2001). Negative effects of reward on intrinsic motivation—a limited phenomenon: Comment on Dec, Koestner, and Ryan. Review of Educational Research, 71, 29-42.\nCarringer, D. C. (1974). Creative thinking abilities of Mexican youth: The relationship to bilingualism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 493-504.\nCarrow, S. M. A. (1957). Linguistic functioning of bilingual and monolingual children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 22, 371-380.\nCederblom, J., & Paulsen, D.W. (2006). Critical Reasoning: Understanding and Criticizing Arguments and Theories, 6th edn. Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.\nColburn, A. (2010). Literature Circles. The Science Teacher, Jan, 77 (1), 8.\nCondon, W., & Kelly-Riley, D. (2004). Assessing and teaching what we value: The relationship between college-level writing and critical thinking abilities. Assessing Writing, 9 (1), 56-75.\nCoyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.\nThe Institute for Academic Excellence. (1997). Critical Thinking and Literature-Based Reading. Madison, WI: U.S.\nDewey, J. (1910). How we think. Lexington, Massachusetts: D.C. Heath.\nEllis, H. (Producer), & Kramer, L. (Director). (2004). The Five People You Meet in Heaven [Motion picture]. United States: Hallmark Entertainment.\nEllis, R. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nEnnis, R. H. (1981). Eight fallacies in Bloom’s taxonomy. Philosophy of Education, \n269-273. \nEnnis, R. H. (1993). Critical Thinking Assessment. Theory into Practice, 32 (3),\n179-186.\nFacione, P.A. (1990). Critical thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Newark, DE: American Philosophical Association. \nFahim, M., & Bagheri, M. (2012). Fostering critical thinking through Socrates’ questioning in Iranian language institutes. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3 (6), 1122-1127.\nFain, J. (2008). “Um, they weren’t thinking about their thinking”: Children’s talk about issues of oppression. Multicultural Perspectives, 10 (4), 201-208.\nGardner, H. E. (2008). Multiple Intelligences, Basic Books, , ISBN-13: 9780465047680 \nGunning, C. S. (1981). Relationships among field independence, critical thinking ability, and clinical problem solving ability of baccalaureate nursing students. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, B2780.\nGunter, M., Estes, T., & Mintz, S. (2010). Instruction: A model Approach, (5th ed.).\nBoston: Pearson Education, Inc.\nHarris, C. W. (1948). An exploration of language skill patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, 32, 351-364.\nHult, M., & Lennung, S. A. (1980). Towards a definition of action research: A note and bibliography. Journal of Management Studies, May, 17, 241-250.\nKeady, C. (2014). Move Over, M & M’s: The Chicago Park District is Working to\nImprove Park Food. Time for Kids, August. Retrieved from: http://www.timeforkids.com/news/move-over-mms/168286\nKemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action Research Planner. 3rd ed. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.\nKonaka, K. (1997). The relationship between degree of bilingualism and gender to divergent thinking ability among native Japanese-speaking children in New York area. Doctoral Dissertation, New York University, 1997. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, AAM9718715.\nKhatib, M., & Shakouri, N. (2013). Literature stance in developing critical thinking: A\npedagogical look. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, October, 2 (4), 101-108.\nKiruthika, P., & Kumaar, J. S. (2011). Literature – A mode to improve critical thinking skills. Language in India: Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow, 11(12), 293-298.\nKurtz, John W. (1943). The teaching of literature in elementary language classes. The Modern Language Journal. 27 (7), 517-521.\nLave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nLazere, D. (1987). Critical Thinking in College English Studies. ERIC Digest. ED\n284275.http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServ\nlet?=accno=ED284275\nLewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34-46.\nLeicester, M., & Taylor, D. (2010). Critical Thinking across the Curriculum: Developing Critical Thinking Skills, Literacy and Philosophy in the Primary \nClassroom. Maidenhead : McGraw-Hill Education.\nLong, C. J. (2003). Teaching critical thinking in Western and Non-western contexts: cultural imperialism and practical necessity. Proceedings of the 8th Conference of Pan-Pacific, Association of Applied Linguistics: 235-246. \nMcKay, S. (1986). Literature in the ESL Classroom. Literature and Language Teaching. Ed. C.J. Brumfit and R.A. Carter. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 191-198. \nMcMillan, M. M., & Gentile, L. M. (1988). Children`s literature: Teaching critical thinking and ethics. The Reading Teacher, May, 41(9), 876.\nMulnix, J. W. (2012). Thinking Critically about Critical Thinking. Educational\nPhilosophy and Theory, 44 (5)\nNewman, A. A. (2011). They’ve Got Personality. Reading Street (pp. 164-167). New Jersey: Pearson.\nNoddings, N. (1984). Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education.\nBerkeley, CA: University of California Press.\nNunan, D. (2007). Research Methods in Language Learning. U.S.A.: Cambridge University Press.\nNystrand, Martin. (1991). Making It Hard: Curriculum and Instruction as Factors in \nthe Difficulty of Literature. In The Idea of Difficulty in Literature, ed. Alan\nPurves, 141-56. Albany: State University of New York Press.\nOpitz, M. F., & Rasinski, T.V. (2008). Good-bye, Round Robin. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.\nPaul, R., & E. Elder. (2006). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Upper Saddle River, NY: Pearson Prentice Hall.\nPaul, R., L. Elder, & Bartell, T. (1997). California Teacher Preparation for Instruction in Critical Thinking: Research Findings and Policy Recommendations. Sacramento, CA: California Commission on Teacher Credentialing.\nPica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communicative tasks for second language instruction. Tasks in a Pedagogical Context. Cleveland, UK: Multilingual Matters.\nPrabhu, N .S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nProbst, Robert E. (1994). Reader-response theory and the English curriculum. The English Journal, 83 (3), 37-44.\nPressley, Dolezal, Raphael, Mohan, Roehrig, & Bogner. (2003). Increasing academic motivation in primary grades. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 6 (3), 372-392.\nRapoport, R. N. (1970). Three dilemmas in action research, Human Relations, 23 (6), 499-513.\nRasinski, T. V., & Hoffman, J. V. (2003). Theory and research into practice: oral reading in the school literacy curriculum. Reading Research Quarterly, 38 (4), \n 510-522.\nSaer, D. J. (1923). The effects of bilingualism on intelligence. British Journal of Psychology, 14, 25-38.\nScriven, M., & Paul, R. (2008a). Defining Critical Thinking, Foundation for Critical Thinking , http://www.criticalthinking.org/aboutCT/definingCT.cfm\nSkehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, 183-205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nSowa, P. (2009). Understanding our learners and developing reflective practices: Conducting action research with English language learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1026-1032.\nStephens, M. (1997). Bilingualism, creativity, and social problem-solving. Doctoral dissertation, Fordham University, 1997. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, AAM9729615.\nSuntharesan, V., (2014). Task Based Language Teaching To Promote Communicative Competence. Language in India, 14 (8), 174-187.\nTompkins, G. E. (2006). Literacy for the 21st Century: A Balanced Approach (Fourth Edition).New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.\nToy, B. Y., & Ok, A. (2012). Incorporating critical thinking in the pedagogical content of a teacher education programme: Does it make a difference? European Journal of Teacher Education,35 (1), 39-56.\nTung, C., & Chang, S. (2009). Developing critical thinking through literature reading. Feng Chia Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (pp. 287-317). College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Feng Chia University, Taiwan.\nTurnage, S. (2012). Three Times Lucky. New York: Puffin Books.\nUbukawa, E., & Ishida, Y. (2003). Using Children’s Literature in the EFL Reading Classroom. Maebashi, 3, 57-72.\nWallerstein, N. (1983). Language and culture in conflict: Problem-posing in the ESL classroom. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.\nWyatt, M. (2011). Teachers researching their own practice. ELT Journal, 65, 417-425.\nYukiko I. Y., Sasaki, D., & Yamamoto, S. J. (2007). Integrating critical thinking skills\ninto the EFL classroom. CamTESOL Conference on English language teaching: Selected Papers, 3, 207- 210.\nZehr, M. A. (2010). Reading aloud to teens gains favor among teachers. Education Digest. 76 (1), 4-7. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 英語教學碩士在職專班 102951004 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102951004 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100401.pdf | 1.47 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.