Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99519


Title: 家庭訪問之親師成員類別研究
A Study on Membership Categorization Analysis of Teachers and Parents Through Home Visits
Authors: 蔡善惠
Contributors: 江靜之
蔡善惠
Keywords: 親師溝通
家庭訪問
身份轉換
成員類別分析
Parent-teacher communication
Home visit
Identity transformation
Membership categorization analysis
Date: 2016
Issue Date: 2016-08-02 15:48:03 (UTC+8)
Abstract: 中文摘要
家庭訪問是親師溝通的重要管道,教師與家長常常藉此進行教育理念的溝通或教養方式的協調,教師與家長常會在訪談中變換身份,彼此在不同時機以不同角色進行互動。如何選擇適合的身份進行溝通,在社會文化中是極其自然的現象,研究者希望藉由家訪在社會活動脈絡中具有的獨特意義,解釋日常生活中的常識性知識如何被人們理解與運用的現象。
  本研究透過成員類別分析法,探知家庭訪問中教師、家長及學生在溝通時,如何使用大量類別知識溝通的樣貌,研究者以國民中學十則家庭訪問對話記錄作 為分析個案,描繪以下三類現象:第一,家訪的樣貌;第二,家訪機制中的成員類別內涵;第三,成員類別身份轉換。
  首先,藉由訪問者語言工具箱的整體提問順序、開場白及結語、問問題、人稱代名詞,勾勒出家訪的樣貌;其次,描繪出教師、家長身份的類別內涵,以及親師言談建構出的學生形象。
  教師擁有教育者或輔導者的身份,也有轉換為私領域身份(如女兒、太太、媽媽)的現象;家長是照顧者,同時也是教育者;國中生在家長與老師眼中是不成熟的青少年、面臨抉擇的轉大人階段、更是背負著期許的承繼者。研究者藉由家訪中的言語對談,闡述以上這些身份的類別內涵,描繪出社會文化對於教師與家長、學生有何種身份期待的文化現象。
  最後,陳述教師與家長轉換身份的時機點:教師在交談時因為爭取話權、居中協商、提供教養方式,而不自覺地轉換身份;家長在交談時則因為闡述事實、釐清觀念、尋求支持,而不自覺地轉換身份。教師 /家長的關係成為朋友/朋友之間的關係,運用相通的社會知識溝通,採用社會類別的特徵表達,或是藉著存在於社會中的類別知識協商,這些都呈現了社會文化的一部份。
關鍵字詞:親師溝通、家庭訪問、身份轉換、成員類別分析
Abstract
Home visits are important channels for communication between teachers and parents. Through this, teachers and parents often carry out communication of educational philosophy or coordination of teaching and rearing approaches. Oftentimes, teachers and parents go through identity transformation during their conversations. They take on different identities at different times to interact with each other. How to choose an appropriate identity to proceed with conversations has become a very natural phenomenon in social culture. Through the unique significance of home visits in the context of social activities, the researcher hopes to explain the phenomenon of how commonsense knowledge is understood and utilized by people.
Through membership categorization analysis, this study explores how the considerable amount of knowledge communication is used between teachers, parents, and students as they communicate with each other during home visits. The research used ten recorded conversations of junior high school home visits as case studies. The following three phenomena are depicted: First, the appearance of home visits; Second, implications of membership categorization of home visits’ mechanism; Third, identity transformation of membership categorization.
First, the appearance home visits is depicted through interviewers’ language toolkit, including the overall order of questioning, opening and closing remarks, asking questions, and personal pronoun. Second, the categorization connotation of identities of teachers and parents are illustrated. The image of students created by parents and teachers through their conversations is also illustrated.
Teachers have the identity of educators or counselors. The phenomenon of transforming into a private identity (such as a daughter, wife, or mother) was seen. Parents are caregivers; they are also educators at the same time. Junior high school students are immature teenagers in the eyes of parents and teachers. They are at the stage of becoming adults, which is associated with decision-making. They are also successors burdened with expectations. Through the conversations during home visits, the researcher expounded the categorization connotation of the above identities. The kind of cultural phenomena of teachers, parents, and students expected by the social culture are illustrated.
Finally, the points of time of identity transformation of teachers and parents are presented. During conversations, to fight for the authority of their words, coordinate, and provide teaching and rearing approaches, teachers underwent identity transformation unconsciously. During conversations, to set forth facts, clarify perspectives, and seek support, parents underwent identity transformation unconsciously. A teacher-parent relationship was transformed into a friend-friend relationship. This is done through utilization of common social knowledge to communicate, adoption of social category’s characteristic expression, or by the categorial knowledge consultation existed in the society. These have all presented a part of social culture.

Keywords: Parent-teacher communication, Home visit, Identity transformation,Membership categorization analysis
Reference: 中文部分
王秋絨(2001)。〈親師溝通的合夥魅力〉。《學生輔導月刊》,72:4-9。
呂君蕙(2013)。《學前教師與特殊幼兒家長親師溝通的文獻》,國立嘉義大學幼兒教育學系研究所碩士論文。
任秀媚(1985)。《家長參與幼兒學校學習活動對幼兒社會行為之影響》,國立臺灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文。
江靜之(2005)。《尋找理想的廣電新聞訪問者:論述角度之分析》,國立政治大
學新聞研究所博士論文。
江靜之(2009)。《從論述角度探析,廣電新聞訪問者的現實與理想》。台北:秀威資訊。
阮惠華(2002)。《國民小學親師溝通之行動研究:以一個班級為例》,國立台東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文。
邱如美(譯)(2000)。W. D. Anne, L. K. jean著。〈親師新主張;借鏡美國教改經驗〉。台北:天下遠見。
林珍宇(2001)。《國民小學親師溝通互動歷程之個案研究》,國立花蓮師範學
院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
林耀蘭(2005)。《幼稚園親師合作的探究歷程》,國立新竹教育大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文。
吳金香、陳彥貝(2005)。〈國民小學施行班級親師合作之研究—以一個實施九年一貫課程的班級為例〉。《國民教育研究學報》,15,123-155。
姜政光(2008)。《高雄市國民小學教師對親師衝突知覺與親師溝通效能關係之
研究》,高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
洪千惠(2005)。《國小一年級教師營造親師關係之個案研究》,國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。
陳嘉芬(2003)。《國民小學教師教學效能與親師溝通相關之研究》,慈濟大學教
育研究所碩士論文。
郭耀隆(1998)。《國民小學親師合作之研究-一個班級之個案研究》,國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
張明侃(1996)。《桃園縣國民小學家長會參與校務運作之分析研究》。國立
台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
張文昭(1997)。《以親師合作團隊推行國小鄉土教學活動課程之研究》,國立
師範大學環境教育研究所碩士論文。
黃美香(2003)。《高雄縣市公私立幼稚園家長參與班級活動之調查研究》,屏
東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
黃淑華(2005)。《國民小學低年級教師親師關係與溝通之研究》,臺北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
趙聖秋(1998)。《國小家長與教師溝通及其相關研究》,台北市立師範學院國
民教育研究所碩士論文。
劉楊(2012)。〈兒童分類意識對會話衝突行為的影響〉。《學前教育研究》,
28(6):98-103。
潘琪,陳宏俊(2012)。〈成員分類分析的理論基礎與研究〉。《外國語文》,28(6):98-103。
鄭文川(2004)。《高雄市國民小學家長會組織運作與學校效能關係之研究》,國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
鍾育琦(2000)。《國民小學教師對親師衝突的觀點及其處理方式之研究》,國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
鐘婷婷(2004)。《幼稚園教師因應教師衝突之研究:以高雄市為例》,國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
謝鴻隆(2003)。《國民小學親師互動之個案研究》,國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。

英文部分
Abell, J.,& Stokoe, E. H. (2001). Broadcasting the royal role: Constructing culturally situated identities in the Princess Diana Panorama interview. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(3),417-435.
Greg, Myers., & Sofia, Lampropoulou.(2013).What place references can do in social research interviews. Discourse Studies,15(3):333-351.
Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (Eds.). (1997). Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis (No. 4). University Press of America.
Hornby, G. (2000) . Improving parental involvement. New York, NY: Cassell.
Makitalo,Aso & Saljo,Roger (2002). Talk in institutional context and institutional context in talk :Categorization as stituated Practices. Text,22(1),57-82.
Psathas,G.(1999). Studying the organization in action: Membership categorization and interaction analysis. Human Studies,22(2-4),139-162.
Sacks,H.(1972). An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Data for Doing Sociology.Studies in Social Interaction. Free Press. New York:31-74.
Sacks, H.(1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In R.Turner, Ethnomethodology, pp.216–231. Middlesex, England: Penguin.
Sacks,H.(1992). Lectures on Conversation, Vols 1.and 2. Oxford: Blackwell.
Watson, D.R.(1978).Categorisation,authorisation and blame-negotiation in conversation. Sociology,12(1):105–113.
韋伯文化網路試閱版,上網日期2015年11月10日。(取自
http://www.weber.com.tw/document/pdf/SR07-007-01.pdf)
Description: 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院碩士在職專班
102941019
Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102941019
Data Type: thesis
Appears in Collections:[傳播學院碩士在職專班] 學位論文

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
101901.pdf966KbAdobe PDF405View/Open


All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


社群 sharing