Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99547
題名: 地主國租稅環境對跨國企業海外子公司區位選擇的影響—租稅協定的重要性
The Impact of International Taxation on Location Choice of Multinational Firms: Does Tax Treaty Matter?
作者: 李昀錚
貢獻者: 陳香梅
李昀錚
關鍵詞: 區位選擇
租稅環境
租稅協定
租稅協定網絡
Location choice
International taxation
Tax treaty
Treaty shopping
日期: 2016
上傳時間: 2-Aug-2016
摘要: 為研究地主國租稅環境對台灣跨國企業海外子公司區位選擇的影響,本文以巢式羅吉特模型研究 2001 年至 2013 年間台灣上市櫃公司海外關係企業(排除金融保險業和 F 股)的資料。相對於過去探討海外子公司區位選擇的文獻僅著重於地主國稅率和地主國是否有反避稅制度(移轉訂價制度和資本弱化條款),本文首度加入租稅協定相關的變數:「地主國是否與台灣簽訂租稅協定」和「地主國租稅協定網絡」,探討兩者與海外子公司區位選擇的關係。\n本研究實證結果發現地主國與台灣簽訂租稅協定並不能增加海外子公司在該地設立的機率,反而可能因租稅協定中的資訊交換條款而降低在該地設立子公司的機率;地主國租稅協定網絡愈豐富則是會增加跨國企業在該地設立海外子公司的機率,表示跨國企業可能藉由設立在租稅協定網絡豐富國家的海外子公司,適用該國的租稅協定利益。其他與地主國租稅環境相關變數的實證結果為潛在地主國稅率愈低及無反避稅制度的國家會較吸引海外子公司的設立。
Using nested logit model, the thesis examined the impact of international taxation on location choice of Taiwanese multinational firms from 2001 to 2013. Compared to previous studies that only focused on the impact of tax rate and anti-avoidance legislations (transfer pricing rule and thin capitalization prvision), the thesis focused on the impact of tax treaty, examining the relationship between location choice and bilateral or multilateral tax treaties.\nThe results showed that countries which had tax treaty with Taiwan did not attract Taiwanese multinational firms, and the possible reason was the exchange of information article in tax treaties. The study also found that the more tax treaties one potential host country had, the higher probability of Taiwanese multinational enterprises setting up subsidiaries in that host country, which suggested that Taiwanese multinational enterprises may have the behavior of treaty shopping. Other results related to tax variables showed that potential host countries with lower tax rate or with no anti-avoidance legislations would attract Taiwanese multinational firms.
參考文獻: 高長、蔡依帆 (2007),「台商投資大陸與兩岸產業分工發展趨勢」,《兩岸經貿月刊》,183,2–6。\nBaker, P. L. (2014), “An Analysis of Double Taxation Treaties and their Effect on Foreign Direct Investment,” International Journal of the Economics of Business, 21(3), 341–377.\nBarrios, S., H. Huizinga, L. Laeven, and G. Nicodeme (2012), “International Firm Location Decisions,” Journal of Public Economics, 96, 946–958.\nBartelsman, E.J., and R.M.W.J. Beetsma (2003), “Why Pay More? Corporate Tax Avoidance Through Transfer Pricing in OECD Countries,” Journal of Public Economics, 87, 2225–2252.\nBarthel, F., M. Busse, and E. Neumayer (2010), “The Impact of Double Taxation Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Large Dyadic Panel Data,” Contemporary Economic Policy, 28(3), 366–377.\nBasile R., D. Castellani, and A. Zanfei (2008), “Location Choices of Multinational Firms in Europe: The Role of EU Cohesion Policy,” Journal of International Economics, 74, 328–340.\nBecker, S., K. Ekholm, R. Jackle, and M.A. Muendler (2005), “Location Choice and Employment Decisions: A Comparison of German and Swedish Multinationals,” Review of World Economies, 141(4), 693–731.\nBernard, A. B., J. B. Jensen, and P. K. Schott (2006), “Transfer Pricing by U.S.-based Multinational Firms,” NEBR Working Paper, No.12493.\nBlonigen B.A., and R.B. Davies (2002), “Do Bilateral Tax Treaties Promote Foreign Direct Investment?” NEBR Working Paper, No.8834.\nBlonigen, B.A., and R.B. Davies (2004), “The Effects of Bilateral Tax Treaties on U.S. FDI Activity,” International Tax and public Finance, 11, 601–622.\nBlonigen, B.A., L. Oldenski, and N. Sly (2014), “The Differential Effects of Bilateral Tax Treaties,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(2), 1–18.\nBlouin, J., H. Huizinga, L. Laeven, and G. Nicodème (2014), “Thin Capitalization Rules and Multinational Firm Capital Structural,” IMF Working Paper, No.14/12.\nBrulhart, M., M. Jametti, and K. Schmidheiny (2012), “Do Agglomeration Economics Reduce the Sensitivity of Firm Location to Tax Differentials?” The Economic Journal, 122, 1069–1093.\nBuettner, T., and Ruf, M. (2007), “Tax Incentives and the Location of FDI: Evidence from a Panel of German Multinationals,” International Tax and Public Finance, 14(2), 151–164.\nBuettner, T., M. Overesch, U. Schreiber, and G. Wamser (2008), “The Impact of Thin Capitalization Rules on Multinationals’ Financing and Investment Decisions,” CESifo Working Paper Series, No. 1817.\nBuettner T., M. Overesch, U. Schreiber, and G. Wamser (2012), “The Impact of Thin-Capitalization Rules on the Capital Structure of Multinational Firms,” Journal of Public Economics, 96, 930–938.\nClausing, K. A. (2003), “Tax-motivated Transfer Pricing and US Intrafirm Trade Prices,” Journal of Public Economics, 87, 2207–2223.\nClausing, K.A. (2006), “International Tax Avoidance and U.S. International Trade,” National Tax Journal, 59(2), 269–287.\nDevereux M. P., and R. Griffith (1998), “Taxes and the Location of Production: Evidence from a Panel of US Multinationals,” Journal of Public Economics, 68, 335–367.\nDuanmu, J.L. (2012), “Firm Heterogeneity and Location Choice of Multinational Enterprises (MNEs),” Journal of World Business, 47, 64–72.\nEgger, P., M. Larch, M. Pfaffermayr, and H. Winner (2006), “The Impact of Endogenous Tax Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Theory and Evidence,” Canadian Journal of Economics 39(3), 901-931. \nErnst & Young (2013), Worldwide Corporate Tax Guide, Retrieved June 14 2016, from: http://www.ey.com/GL/en/Services/Tax/Global-tax-guide-archive\nGazaniol, A. (2015), “The Location Choices of Multinational Firms: the Role of Internationalization Experience and Group Affiliation,” The World Economy, 38(8), 1246–1277.\nHead, K., and Mayer, T. (2004), “Market Potential and the Location of Japanese Investment in the European Union,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86 (4), 959–972.\nHeiss, F. (2002), “Structural Choice Analysis with Nested Logit Models,” The Stata Journal 2 (3), 227–252.\n\nHensher, D. A., J. M. Rose, and W. H. Greene (2005), Applied Choice Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nHong, J. (2009), “Heterogeneity and Location Choices: Evidence from Foreign Manufacturing Investments in China,” Urban Studies, 46(10), 2143–2157.\nHuizinga, H., L. Laeven, and G. Nicodème (2008), “Capital Structure and International Debt Shifting,” Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 80–118.\nJost, S.P., M. Pfaffermayr, M. Stoeckl, and H. Winner (2010), “Profit Shifting within Multinational Firms: The Role of Entity Characterization Profiles,” Working Paper, February.\nKoppelman, F. S., and C. H. Wen (1998), “Alternative Nested Logit Models: Structure, Properties and Estimation,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 32(5), 289–298.\nKPMG (2011), Corporate and Indirect Tax Survay 2011, Retrieved June 14 2016, from:https://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/corporate-and-indirect-tax-rate-survey-2011.pdf\nKPMG (2014), Global Transfer Pricing Review, Retrieved June 15 2016, from: https://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/global-transfer-pricing-review/Documents/gtpr-2014-full-report.pdf\nKudina, A., and M. Jakubiak (2008), “The Motives and Impediments to FDI in the CIS,” OECD Global Forum on International Investment,” EU eastern neighborhood, 71–82, Berlin Heidelberg, Springer. \nLawless, M., D. McCoy, E. Morgenroth, and C. O`Toole (2015), “Corporate Tax and Location Choice for Multinational Firms,” MPRA Working Paper, No. 64769.\nLejour, A. (2014), “The Foreign Investment Effects of Tax Treaties,” CPB Discussion Paper, No. 265.\nLohse, T., N. Riedel, and C. Spengel (2014), “The Increasing Importance of Transfer Pricing Regulations – a Worldwide Overview,” Intertax, 42, 352–404.\nMerlo, V., N. Riedel, and G. Wamser (2014), “Anti-Avoidance Legislations and the Location Choice of Multinational Firms,” ETPF/IFS conference.\nMerlo, V., N. Riedel, and G. Wamser (2015), “The Impact of Thin Capitalization Rules on the Location of Multinational Firms’ Foreign Affiliates,” CESifo Working Paper, No. 5449.\nOveresch, M., and G. Wamser (2010), “Corporate Tax Planning and Thin-capitalization Rules: Evidence from a Quasi-experiment,” Applied Economics, 42(5), 563–573.\nOveresch, M., and J. Rincke (2011), “What Drives Corporate Tax Rates Down? a Reassessment of Globalization, Tax Competition, and Dynamic Adjustment to Shocks,” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113(3), 579–602.\nRasciute, S., and E. J. Pentecost (2010) “A Nested Logit Approach to Modelling the Location of Foreign Direct Investment in the Central and Eastern European Countries,” Economic Modelling, 27, 32–39. \nSiedschlag, I., X. Zhang, and D. Smith (2013)a, “What Determines the Location Choice of Multinational Firms in the Information and Communication Technologies Sector?” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22 (6), 581–600.\nSiedschlag, I., X. Zhang, D. Smith, and C. Turcu (2013)b, “What Determines the Location Choice of R&D Activities by Multinational Firms?” Research Policy, 42, 1420–1430.\nSpengel, Christoph, S. Lazar, L. Evers, and B. Zinn (2012), “Romania`s Development to a Low-Tax Country: Effective Corporate Tax Burden in Romania from 1992 to 2010 and Romania`s Current Ranking Among the Eastern European Member States,” ZEW Discussion Paper, No.12-003.\nUnited Nations (2013), Practical Transfer Pricing Issues for Developing Countries, New York: United Nations.\nWeyzig, F. (2013), “Tax Treaty shopping: Structural Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment Routed Through the Netherlands,” International tax and public finance, 20, 910–937.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
財政學系
104255003
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1042550031
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
003101.pdf1.59 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.