Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99864| 題名: | 解殖後香港政治機會與社會抗爭 Political Opportunity and Social Protests in Postcolonial Hong Kong |
作者: | 趙尊立 Chao, Tsun Li |
貢獻者: | 李明 Li, Ming 趙尊立 Chao, Tsun Li |
關鍵詞: | 香港 政治機會 社會抗爭 Hong Kong Political Opportunity Social protest |
日期: | 2015 | 上傳時間: | 9-Aug-2016 | 摘要: | 自九七回歸以來，香港經歷一系列民主化過程，一國兩制對整個城市的影響日益加深。本文利用政治機會結構的模式，來探討回歸後社會抗爭的發展，並用以觀察解殖後現今香港社會抗爭激增的原因。香港政府與社會的關係自回歸以來矛盾逐漸浮現，港府與民眾的民主認知差距導致人民屢次走上街頭，此矛盾衝突恐將進一步擴大。本文希冀能藉由政治過程論提出整合性的觀點，更全面的的剖析香港社會抗爭的變遷。 Hong Kong is undergoing the process of democratization; what happens in Hong Kong now interprets how “one country, two systems” is affecting the city. The study uses “political process model” to examine the trend of social protests development in post colonial Hong Kong, then observes and explains the phenomena of the increment of social protests in Hong Kong society after decolonization. \nConceptual analysis and evaluation of transformation of the political reform and social movement is also the focus of the research, in summary, the study would like to make an integrated theoretical perspective and provide a comprehensive analysis on the transformation of social protests in Hong Kong |
參考文獻: | References\n \nBooks\n\nBurns, John P. 2002. “Civil Service Reform in the Hong Kong SAR” in Lau Siu-kai ed. The First Tung Chee-hwa Administration, pp. 267-288. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press. \n\nChan, Johanns. 2002. “Civil Liberties, Rule of Law and Human Rights: The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in Its First Four Years” in Lau Siu-kai ed., The First Tung Chee-hwa Administration, pp. 99-105. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press\n\nCheng, Joseph. 2001. “The Constitution, Political, and Legal Order of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region” in Joseph Cheng ed. Political Development in the HKSAR, pp. 13-40. Hong Kong: Contemporary China Research Project, City University of Hong Kong.\n\nCheung, Anthony B. L. and Louie Kin0shun. 2000. “Transformation of the Civil Service System” in Ming K. Chan and Alvin Y. So eds. Crisis and Transformation in China’s Hong Kong, pp. 166-188. New York: M. E. Sharp, Inc.\n\nCheung, Anthony B. L. 2002. “Transformation of the Civil Service System” in Ming K. Chan and Alvin Y. So eds. Crisis and Transformation in China’s Hong Kong, pp. 99-105. New York: M. E. Sharpe, Inc. \n\nChiu, Stephen Wing-Kai and Lui Tai-lok. 2000. The Dynamics of Social Movement in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.\n\nChui, Wing-tak. 2000. “Elite-Mass Relationship in Hong Kong: Evolving Patterns and Directions of Development” in Lau Siu-kai ed. Social Development and Political Change in Hong Kong, pp. 378-408. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.\n\nDalton, Russell. 1996. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.\n\nEyerman, Ron and Andrew Jamison. 1991. Social Movement: A Cognitive Approach. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.\n\nFox, Elizabeth. 1998. “Latin American Broadcasting and the State: Friend and Foe” in Patrick H. O’Neil ed. Communicating Democracy: The Media and Political Transitions, pp. 21-38. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.\n\nGamson, William. 1990. The Strategy of Social Protest. Belmont, Calf.: Wadsworth.\n\nGamson, William, and David Meyer. 1996. “The Framing of Political Opportunity” in Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald eds. Comparative Perspectives on Social Moments: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Pp. 275-290. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\n\nHechter, Michael. 1975, Internal colonialism: the Celtic fringe in British national development, 1536-1966. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.\n\nHipcher, Patricia L. 1998a. “Democratic Transitions and Social Movement Outcomes” in Marco G. Giugni, Doug McAdam, and Carles Tilly eds. From Contention to Democracy, pp. 149-167. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.\n\nHo, Denny Kwok-leung. 2000. Polite Politics: A Sociological analysis of an urban protest in Hong Kong. Aldershot: Ashgate.\n\nHuntington, Samuel. P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.\n\nJessop, Bob. 1998. “The rise of the governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development.” UNRISD.\n\nKuan, Hsin-chi, and Lau, Siu-kai. 2000. “Political Attitudes in a Changing Context” in Lau Siu-kai ed. Social Development and Political Change in Hong Kong, pp 287-307. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press. \n\nLau, Siu-kai. 1982. Society and Politics in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.\n\nLau, Siu-kai. 1990. Decolonization Without Independence and the Poverty of Political Leaders in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.\n\nLau, Siu-kai ed. 2000a. Social Development and Political Change in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press. \n\nLau, Siu-kai. 2000b. “Democratization, Poverty of Political Leaders, and Political Inefficacy in Hong Kong” in Lau Siu-kai ed. Social Development and Political Change in Hong Kong, pp. 355-372. Hong Kong: The Chinese University.\n\nLau, Siu-kai and Kuan Hsin-chi. 1988. The Ethos of the Hong Kong Chinese. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.\n\nLau, Siu-kai, and Wan Po-san. 2000. “Social Conflict: 1987-1995” in Lau Siu-kai ed. Social Development and Political Change in Hong Kong, pp. 115-170. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press. \n\nLeung, Benjamin K. P. 1996. Perspectives on Hong Kong Society. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.\n\nLo, Shiu-hing. 1997. The Politics of Democratization in Hong Kong. London: Macmillian Press Ltd. \n\nLui, Tai Lok and Stephen Wing Kai Chiu. 2000. “Introduction – Changing Political Opportunities and the Shaping of Collective Action: Social Movement in Hong Kong” in Stephen Wing Kai Chiu and Tai Lok Liu eds. The Dynamics of Social Movement in Hong Kong, pp. 1-19. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.\n\nMaguire, Diarmuid. 1995. “Opposition Movements and Opposition Parties: Equal Partners or Dependent Relations in the Struggle for Power and Reform?” in J. Craig Jenkins and Bert Klandermans eds. The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements, pp. 199-228. London: University College of London. \n\nMarkoff, John. 1996. Waves of Democracy: Social Movements and Political Change. California: Pine Forge Press.\n\nMcAdam, Doug. 1991. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency 1930 – 1970. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.\n\nMcAdam, Doug. 1998. “The Future of Social Movements” in Marco G. Giugni, Doug McAdam and Charles Tilly eds. From Contention to Democracy, pp. 229-245. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.\n\nMcAdam, Doug. 1999. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency 1930-1970. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.\n\nMcAdam, Doug. John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. 1996. “Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing process-toward a synthetic, comparative perspective on social movement” in Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald eds. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, pp. 1-20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. \n\nMeyer, David and Tarrow Sindney. 1998. The Social Movement Society. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.\n\nMing Sing, 2004. Hong Kong’s Tortuous Democratization: A Comparative Analysis. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon.\n\n\nOberschall, Anthony. 1973. Social Conflict and Social Movement. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.\n\nO’ Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe C., and Laurence Whitehead. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.\n\nPiven, Frances Fox and Richard A. Cloward. 1977. Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage books.\n\nRucht, Dieter. 1996. “The impact of national contexts on social movement structures: A cross-movement and cross-national comparison” in Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald eds. Comparative Perspective on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, pp. 185-204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. \n\nSen, Amartya Kumar. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.\n\nSo, Alvin. 2002. “Social Protest, Legitimacy Crisis, and the Impetus Toward Soft Authoritarianism in the Hong Kong SAR” in Lau, Siu-Kai ed. The First Tung Chee-hwa Administration, pp. 399-418. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.\n\nSun, Yun-wing. 2002. “Hong Kong Economy in Crisis” in Lau Siu-kai ed. The Frist Tung Chee-hwa Administration, pp. 123-138. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press. \n\nTarrow, Sidney. 1996. “States and opportunities: The political structuring of social movements” in Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy and Mayer N. Zald eds. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, pp. 54-56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\n\nTarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in Moment: Social Movement and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\n\nWong, Pik Wan. 2000. “The Pro-Chinese Democracy Movement in Hong Kong” in Stephen Wing Kai Chiu and Tai Lok Lui eds. The Dynamics of Social Movement in Hong Kong, pp. 55-90. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.\n\nScholarly Journals\n\nBrockett, Charles D. 1991. “The Structure of Political Opportunities and Peasant Mobilization in Central America,” Comparative Politics 23: 253-274.\n\nBuechler, Steven M. 1995. “New Social Movement Theories.” The Sociological Quarterly, 36, pp. 441-464.\n\nChan, Kam-tong, Lian Yi-zheng, Eva Liu, Christine Loh, and Angelina Yuen. 2004. “Overview of The Third Sector in Hong Kong” in Study on The Third Sector Landscape in Hong Kong, pp. 1-39. Hong Kong: HKSAR\n\nCheng, Yu-shek. 2004. “The effects of Hong Kong’s grass-root unions to the democratization process and public policies.” Thoughts Bimonthly, 89. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Christian Institute.\n\nEisinger, Peter. 1973. “The Condition of Protest Behavior in American Cities.” American Political Science Review, 67, pp. 11-28\n\nHewitt de Alcantara, Cynthia. 1998. “Uses and abuses of the concept of governance.” International Social Science Journal, Volume 50, Issue 155, pages 105–113, March 1998\n\nKing, Ambrose Y. C. 1975. “Administrative Absorption of Politics in Hong Kong: Emphasis on the Grass Roots Level.” Asian Survey 15 (5), pp. 422-39.\n\nLau, Siu-kai. 1992. “Decline of Governmental Authority. Political Cynicism and Political Inefficacy in Hong Kong.” Journal of Northeast Asian Studies 11: 3-20.\nLiu, Eva. 2004. “Survey” in Study on The Third Sector Landscape in Hong Kong, pp. 416-450. Hong Kong: HKSAR.\n\nStoker, Gerry. 1998. “Governance as theory: five propositions.” International Social Science Journal 155, pp. 17-28.\n\nVatikiotis, Michael. 2004. “Making China Listen” Far Eastern Economic Review.\n\n\nInternet Resources\n\nBasic Law: http://www.basiclaw.gov.hk/\nCivic Exchange: http://www.civic-exchange.org/wp/\nConstitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau: http://www.cmab.gov.hk/\nHong Kong Democratic Development Network: http://www.hkddn.org/\nHong Kong Human Rights Monitor: http://www.hkhrm.org.hk/\nHong Kong Investigation and Research Center: http://www.hongkongirc.org/\nHong Kong and Macao Affairs Office: http://www.hmo.gov.cn/\nHong Kong Policy Research Institute: http://www.hkpri.org.hk\nHong Kong Reporter: http://www.hkreporter.loved.hk/\nLegco Annual Report: http://www.legco.gov.hk/general/english/sec/reports/arpt.htm\nLiaison Office of the Central People`s Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: http://www.locpg.hk/big5/default_310.asp\nOccupy Central with Love and Peace: http://www.oclp.hk/\nOne country two system research center: http://www.octs.org.hk\nPublic Opinion Programme, Hong Kong University. http://hkupop.hku.hk\nRoundtable Institute and its Network: http://www.roundtablecommunity.org.hk\nSynergyNet: http://www.synergynet.org.hk/\n\n中文書目\n\n王家英，1996，〈香港九七主權轉移：情勢的發展與北京的對策〉。臺北：中華歐亞協會。\n\n孔令瑜，2004，〈香港回歸後期的民間維權和公民社會的成長〉，《議報》（香港），171期。\n\n立法局秘書處，1996，〈八十年代以來香港的政治發展〉。香港：立法局。\n\n呂大樂，1996a，〈怎麼辦？香港民眾群眾運動的回顧與前瞻〉，《敢言》。香港：民主黨。\n\n呂大樂，1996b，〈香港故事：香港意識的歷史發展〉，收錄於高成恕，陳介玄主編，《香港：文明的延續與斷裂？》。臺北：香港牛津大學出版社。\n\n呂大樂，2002，〈思想九七前與九七後香港〉，收錄於謝均才編《我們的地方我們的時間：香港社會新編》。香港：香港牛津大學出版社。\n\n呂大樂，2003，〈中產政治勢力抬頭〉，香港《星島日報》2003/7/16\n\n呂大樂，2013。〈呂大樂：深層次矛盾 終於浮上表面了〉，香港《明報》2013/2/15\n\n李永達，1996，〈社會運動與政黨政治〉，《敢言》。香港：民主黨。六月號。\n\n李怡，1996，《香港一九九七》。臺北：商周文化。\n\n香港大學民意研究計劃，2004，《跨政黨香港政制發展調查》。香港：香港大學民意研究計劃。\n\n胡恩威，2004，〈香港明星級議員需演出新劇本〉，《亞洲周刊》（香港）。10月3日。\n\n范國威，2004，〈政黨老化的危機〉，收錄於112位年輕學人合著，《後特區啓示錄》。香港：ROUNDTABLE。頁124-127。\n\n美國國務院，2002，〈中國（香港）部分〉，《二OO一年度各國人權報告》。3月4日。\n\n韋安仕(Stephen Vines)著，霍達文譯，2000，《香港新貴現形記》。臺北：時報文化。\n\n馬嶽，蔡子強，2003, 《選舉制度的政治效果：港式比例代表制的經驗》。香港：香港城市大學。\n\n許家屯，1993，《許家屯香港回憶錄（上）》。臺北：聯經。\n\n陸恭蕙，2004，〈政府與商界的聯盟：香港的功能界別〉。香港：思匯政策研究所。\n\n陳和順，2003，〈新社會運動的開始〉，收錄於葉建民編，《以香港方式繼續愛國：解讀二十三條爭議及七一大遊行》。香港：新力量網路。頁89-97。\n\n陳智遠，2004，〈重構七一效應：一個以選民及選舉工程為本的分析模式〉，收錄於ROUNDTABLE香港青年政策研究所策劃，《戀戰區選：二〇〇三區議會選舉研究集》。香港：香港政策研究所。頁1-46。\n\n張炳良，2003，〈七一後香港不再一樣〉，收錄於葉建民編，《以香港方式繼續愛國：解讀二十三條爭議及七一大遊行》。香港：新力量網路。頁71-81。\n\n張茂桂，1989，〈社會運動的政治轉化〉。臺北：國家政策研究中心。\n\n葉健民 編，2003，《以香港方式繼續愛國：解讀二十三條爭議及七一大遊行》香港：新力量網路。\n\n劉曼容，2001，《港英政府政治制度論》。北京：社會科學文獻出版社。\n\n謝婉卿，梁歷清，1995，〈香港婦女運動與社區工作〉，收錄於莫泰基，郭凱儀，梁寶霖主編，《香港社區工作：反思與前瞻>>。香港：中華書局。頁118-134。\n\n魏樂伯等合著，2002，《當代華人城市的民間社會組織：臺北，香港，廣州，廈門的比較分析》。香港：香港中文大學香港亞太研究所。\n\n蘇鑰機，陳韜文，2004，〈傳媒的代議功能：市民與新聞工作者的評價〉收錄於劉肇嘉，王佳英，尹寶珊編，2004，《香港社會政治的延續與變遷》。香港：香港中文大學香港亞太研究所。 | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS) 99926007 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099926007 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 600701.pdf | 1.97 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.