Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99990


Title: Deriving VP-NEG Questions in Modern Chinese: A Unified Analysis of A-Not-A Syntax
Other Titles: 論現代漢語否定詞結尾問句的衍生方式:各類型正反問句的一致性分析
Authors: 黃瑞恆
Huang, Rui-heng Ray
Keywords: VP-neg questions;negative particle questions;A-not-A questions;disjunctive questions;reduplication, ellipsis
Date: 2008-06
Issue Date: 2016-08-11 11:24:26 (UTC+8)
Abstract: 本文提倡一致性分析(unified analysis)來衍生各種不同類型的正反問句(或稱反覆問句,A-not-A question),其中包含否定詞結尾問句(VP-neg question)。本文提議,所有類型的正反問句皆以同一個單一動詞組為基底,施以構詞重疊(morphological reduplication)而形成,惟某些類型之生成則必須再進行照應刪略(anaphoric ellipsis)。根據此一提案,否定詞結尾問句之衍生,乃透過刪略手段,將動詞組重疊結構(VP-not-VP)刪除後段動詞組而達成。本文同時論證,現代漢語否定詞結尾問句實屬正反問句之變體,而不屬助詞問句(particle question,鄭禮珊等人1996)。此論點可由語言事實加以佐證:否定詞結尾問句與其他類型正反問句在許多方面表現一致,但與典型的助詞問句(「嗎」)表現不同。
This paper advocates a unified analysis of various subtypes of A-not-A questions, including VP-neg questions. It is proposed that all A-not-A subtypes are derived from a simplex VP source via morphological reduplication, with certain subtypes undergoing a further process of anaphoric ellipsis. Under this proposal, VP-neg questions are formed by deleting the second VP of a reduplicated VP-not-VP structure. It is argued that the analysis of VP-neg as an A-not-A variant is more desirable than the analysis of VP-neg as being on a par with a particle question (Cheng et al. 1996), because a number of parallelisms are shown to exist between VP-neg and other subtypes of A-not-A questions, but not between VP-neg and typical particle questions.
Relation: 臺灣語言學期刊, 6(1), 1-54
Taiwan Journal of Linguistics
Data Type: article
DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6519/TJL.2008.6(1).1
Appears in Collections:[台灣語言學期刊 THCI Core ] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
6(1)-1-54.pdf3757KbAdobe PDF411View/Open


All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


社群 sharing