學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 社會風險與風險溝通之研究
Social Risk and Risk Communication作者 高如月
Gau, Ru Yueh貢獻者 鄭文輝
Cheng, Wen Hui
高如月
Gau, Ru Yueh關鍵詞 社會風險
風險溝通
風險認知
風險評估
公害糾紛處理
公害賠償
Social risk
Risk communication
Risk perception
Risk assessment日期 1993 上傳時間 29-四月-2016 16:42:25 (UTC+8) 摘要 十八世紀的工業發展富裕了人類的物質生活,生態環境卻也逐遭破壞 參考文獻 壹、中文部分:1. 中華民國台灣地區環境資訊,行政院環境保護署,中華民國79 年版。2. 湯俊湘,保險學,台北市:三民書局,中華民國76 年。3. 環境保護,立法報章資料專輯第十輯,中華民國76 年11 月。4. 張曉春、蕭新煌、徐正光編,社會轉型,高雄市:敦理出版社,中華民國75 年。5. 70年代反污染自力救濟的結構與過程分析,行政院環境保護署,中華民國77 年8 月。6. 湯德宗著,美國環境法論集,中華民國79 年3 月初版。7. 公害糾紛處理白書,行政院環境保護署,中華民國81 年版。8. 環境保護立法之研究,行政院經濟建設委員會健全經社法規工作小組,中華民國76 年9 月。9. 中華民國台灣地區環境資訊,行政院環境保護署,中華民國79 年版。10. 邱聰智著,公害法原理,輔仁大學法學叢書,中華民國73 年5 月初版。11. 汪銘生著,環境決策與管理,台北市:復興書局,中華民國81 年2 月。12. 段重祺,公共政策與組織學習一興建核能四廠爭議之個案分析,中央研究院三民主義研究所第四次社會科學研討會論文集,中華民國74 年12 月。13. 彭倩文,核能四廠建廠爭議:一個社會學的分析,東吳大學社會研究所社會理論組織文,中華民國76 年6 月。14. 黃淑慧,台灣環境問題根源之探討,台北工專學報第二十四期,中華民國80 年3 月。15. 黃懿慧,從風險溝通理論談美國核電問題,美國月刊第七卷第八期,中華民國81 年8 月。16. 李亦園主持,核能電廠與民眾意識:一個社會生態學的研究,清華大學人文社會學院,中華民國76年12 月。17. 侯崇文,環境公害與社會控制,警政學報第十六期,中華民國78年。18. 姜蘭虹,災害之人文與社會衝擊一基隆市山坡地災害識覺之個案研究,台大地理系,中華民國77 年。19. 張世雄,社會保險的社會邏輯,國立中正大學社會福利學系暨研究所第一次社會安全會議論文集,中華民國81 年12 月。1. Bohnenblust, H., and Schneider, Th., IJRisk appraisal-can it beimproved by formal decision models?" in Covello, V.T., Lave, L.B.,Moghissi, A., and Uppuluri, V.R.R., eds., Uncertainty in RiskAssessment, Risk Management, and Decision Making. New Yorkand London. Plenum Press, 1987, 71-87.2. Bowman, P.A., "An Introduction to the Texas Risk CommunicationProcess" in Garrick, BJ., and Gekler, W.c., eds., The Analysis,Communication, and Perception of Risk. New Yark: Plenum Press.1991, 207-212.3. Covello, V.T., "Risk comparisons and risk communication: Issuesand problems in comparing health and environmental risks." inKasperson, R.E., and Stallen, PJ.M., eds., Comm unica ting Risks tothe Public: International Perspectives. Dordrecht: KluwerAcademic Publishers. 1991, 79-124.4. Covello, V.T., von Winterieldt, D., and Slovic, P., "CommunicatingScientific Information About Health and Environmental Risks:Problems and Opportunities from a Social and BehavioralPerspective" in Covello, V.T., Lave, L.B., Moghissi, A., andUncertain ty in Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and DecisionMaking. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1987, 221-239.5. Covello, V.T., von Winterfeldt, D., and Slovic, P., "Risk Communication:A review of the literature" Risk Abstracts 3(4): 1986, 171-182.6. Fessenden-Rad N,]., and Heath ].S., "Communicating Risk: FactorsAffecting Community Acceptance of information" in Cox, Jr., L.A.,and Ricci, P.F. eds., New Risks New York an London: Plenum Press,1990, 573-578.7. Kasperson, R.E., and Stallen, PJ.M., eds., Communicating Risks tothe Public: International Perspectives. Dordrecht: KluwerAcademic Publishers. 1991. 1-12.8. Lich ten berg, ]., and MacLean, D., "The role of the media in riskcommunication." in Kasperson, R.E., and Stallen, PJ.M., eds.,Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pu blishers. 1991, 157-173.9. Menkes, J., and Lave, L.B., "Value and Function of Information inRisk Management" in Covello, V.T., Lave, L.B., Moghissi, A., andUppuluri, V.R.R., eds., Uncertainty in Risk Assessment, RiskManagement, and Decision Making. New York and London:Plenum Press, 1987, 213-239.10. Michaud, G.R., "Accepting New Technology: Community Relationsfor Mobile Incineration in Illinois" in Garrck, BJ., and Gekler, W.c.,eds. The Analysis, Communication, and Perception of Risk. NewYark: Plenum Press. 1991, 525-530.11 Needleman, c., "Ritualism in Communicating Risk Information" inCox, Jr., L.A., and Ricci, P.F. eds., New Risks. New York and London:Plenum Press, 1990, 259-268.12. Null, M.K., "Establishing Communication with Brookhurst: A CoseStudy in Community Involvement" in Garrick, BJ., and Gekler, W.c.,eds., The Analysis, Communication, and Perception of Risk. NewYork: Plenum Press. 1991, 519-523.13. Renn, 0., "Risk communication and social amplification of risk." inKasperson, R.E., and Stallen, PJ.M., eds. Communicating Risks tothe Public: International Perspectives. Dordrecht: KluwerAcademic Publishers, 1991, 287-327.14. Rogers, G.O., "Public Recognition of Hazard" in Covello, V.T., Lave,L.B., Moghissi, A., and Uppuluri, V.R.R., Uncertainty in RiskAssessment, Risk Management, and Decision Making. New Yorkand London: Plenum Press. 1987, 103-116.15. Ra vetz, J.R., "Public Perceptions of Acceptable Risks as Evidencefor Their Cognitive, Technical, and Social Structure" in Dierkes, M.,Edwards, S., and Coppock, R., eds. Technological Risk: ItsPerception and Handling in the European Community. 1980, 46-47.16. Renn, 0., "Concepts of Risk: A Classification" in Krimsky, S., andGolding, D., eds., Social Theories of Risk. Praeger Publishers. 1992,72-76.17. Renn, 0., and Levine, D., 1988. "Credibility and trust in riskcommunication" in Kasperson R.E., and Stallen, PJ.M., eds.,Communicating Risks to the Public. Dordrecth: Kluwr AcademicPublishers. 1991, 175-218.18. Sevenson, 0., "The time dimension in perception and communicationof risk" in Kasperson, R.E., and Stallen, PJ.M., eds., CommunicatingRisks to the public. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1991,263-285.19. Stallen, PJ.M., "Developing communications about risks of majorindustrial accidents in the Netherlands" in Kasperson, R.E., andStallen, PJ.M., eds. Communicating Risks to the Public:In terna tional Perspecti ves. Dordrech t: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1991, 55-66.20. Sorell, T.L., "Common Methodological Flaws in Risk Assessment" inGarrick, BJ., and Gekler, W.c., eds., The Analysis, Communication,and Perception of Risk. New York: Plenum Press, 1991, 229-235.21. Van der Plight, J., and Borer, J.de., "Contaminated soil: pablicreactions, policy decisions, and risk comn1unication" in Kasperson,R.E., and Stallen, PJ.M., eds., Communicating Risks to the Public.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1991, 129-144. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政學系
G80255015資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004143 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 鄭文輝 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Cheng, Wen Hui en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 高如月 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Gau, Ru Yueh en_US dc.creator (作者) 高如月 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Gau, Ru Yueh en_US dc.date (日期) 1993 en_US dc.date.accessioned 29-四月-2016 16:42:25 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 29-四月-2016 16:42:25 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-四月-2016 16:42:25 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) B2002004143 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/88983 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 財政學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) G80255015 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 十八世紀的工業發展富裕了人類的物質生活,生態環境卻也逐遭破壞 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………… 1第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………………………… 1第二節 研究範圍與限制……………………………………………………… 4第三節 研究架構……………………………………………………………… 6第二章 社會風險的本質與涵義………………………………………………… 9第一節 風險的定義…………………………………………………………… 9第二節 風險的分類…………………………………………………………… 12第三節 現代社會風險的本質與社會涵義…………………………………… 16第三章 風險溝通的理論架構…………………………………………………… 19第一節 風險溝通的基本概念………………………………………………… 21第二節 風險認知……………………………………………………………… 27第三節 風險評估……………………………………………………………… 31第四節 風險管理……………………………………………………………… 34第四章 公害糾紛與風險溝通-個案之探討…………………………………… 38第一節 我國公害糾紛個案之回顧…………………………………………… 38第二節 我國公害糾紛個案爭議之剖析……………………………………… 46第三節 就風險溝通角度探究我國公害糾紛個案…………………………… 52第四節 國外風險溝通個案之探討…………………………………………… 59第五章 我國公害糾紛處理與公害補償之探討………………………………… 67第一節 我國公害糾紛現況之分析…………………………………………… 67第二節 我國與日本公害糾紛處理制度之比較……………………………… 72第三節 我國公害補償分析與建議…………………………………………… 81第六章 結論與建議……………………………………………………………… 87參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………… 90 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004143 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會風險 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 風險溝通 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 風險認知 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 風險評估 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公害糾紛處理 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公害賠償 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social risk en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Risk communication en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Risk perception en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Risk assessment en_US dc.title (題名) 社會風險與風險溝通之研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Social Risk and Risk Communication en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 壹、中文部分:1. 中華民國台灣地區環境資訊,行政院環境保護署,中華民國79 年版。2. 湯俊湘,保險學,台北市:三民書局,中華民國76 年。3. 環境保護,立法報章資料專輯第十輯,中華民國76 年11 月。4. 張曉春、蕭新煌、徐正光編,社會轉型,高雄市:敦理出版社,中華民國75 年。5. 70年代反污染自力救濟的結構與過程分析,行政院環境保護署,中華民國77 年8 月。6. 湯德宗著,美國環境法論集,中華民國79 年3 月初版。7. 公害糾紛處理白書,行政院環境保護署,中華民國81 年版。8. 環境保護立法之研究,行政院經濟建設委員會健全經社法規工作小組,中華民國76 年9 月。9. 中華民國台灣地區環境資訊,行政院環境保護署,中華民國79 年版。10. 邱聰智著,公害法原理,輔仁大學法學叢書,中華民國73 年5 月初版。11. 汪銘生著,環境決策與管理,台北市:復興書局,中華民國81 年2 月。12. 段重祺,公共政策與組織學習一興建核能四廠爭議之個案分析,中央研究院三民主義研究所第四次社會科學研討會論文集,中華民國74 年12 月。13. 彭倩文,核能四廠建廠爭議:一個社會學的分析,東吳大學社會研究所社會理論組織文,中華民國76 年6 月。14. 黃淑慧,台灣環境問題根源之探討,台北工專學報第二十四期,中華民國80 年3 月。15. 黃懿慧,從風險溝通理論談美國核電問題,美國月刊第七卷第八期,中華民國81 年8 月。16. 李亦園主持,核能電廠與民眾意識:一個社會生態學的研究,清華大學人文社會學院,中華民國76年12 月。17. 侯崇文,環境公害與社會控制,警政學報第十六期,中華民國78年。18. 姜蘭虹,災害之人文與社會衝擊一基隆市山坡地災害識覺之個案研究,台大地理系,中華民國77 年。19. 張世雄,社會保險的社會邏輯,國立中正大學社會福利學系暨研究所第一次社會安全會議論文集,中華民國81 年12 月。1. Bohnenblust, H., and Schneider, Th., IJRisk appraisal-can it beimproved by formal decision models?" in Covello, V.T., Lave, L.B.,Moghissi, A., and Uppuluri, V.R.R., eds., Uncertainty in RiskAssessment, Risk Management, and Decision Making. New Yorkand London. Plenum Press, 1987, 71-87.2. Bowman, P.A., "An Introduction to the Texas Risk CommunicationProcess" in Garrick, BJ., and Gekler, W.c., eds., The Analysis,Communication, and Perception of Risk. New Yark: Plenum Press.1991, 207-212.3. Covello, V.T., "Risk comparisons and risk communication: Issuesand problems in comparing health and environmental risks." inKasperson, R.E., and Stallen, PJ.M., eds., Comm unica ting Risks tothe Public: International Perspectives. Dordrecht: KluwerAcademic Publishers. 1991, 79-124.4. Covello, V.T., von Winterieldt, D., and Slovic, P., "CommunicatingScientific Information About Health and Environmental Risks:Problems and Opportunities from a Social and BehavioralPerspective" in Covello, V.T., Lave, L.B., Moghissi, A., andUncertain ty in Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and DecisionMaking. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1987, 221-239.5. Covello, V.T., von Winterfeldt, D., and Slovic, P., "Risk Communication:A review of the literature" Risk Abstracts 3(4): 1986, 171-182.6. Fessenden-Rad N,]., and Heath ].S., "Communicating Risk: FactorsAffecting Community Acceptance of information" in Cox, Jr., L.A.,and Ricci, P.F. eds., New Risks New York an London: Plenum Press,1990, 573-578.7. Kasperson, R.E., and Stallen, PJ.M., eds., Communicating Risks tothe Public: International Perspectives. Dordrecht: KluwerAcademic Publishers. 1991. 1-12.8. Lich ten berg, ]., and MacLean, D., "The role of the media in riskcommunication." in Kasperson, R.E., and Stallen, PJ.M., eds.,Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pu blishers. 1991, 157-173.9. Menkes, J., and Lave, L.B., "Value and Function of Information inRisk Management" in Covello, V.T., Lave, L.B., Moghissi, A., andUppuluri, V.R.R., eds., Uncertainty in Risk Assessment, RiskManagement, and Decision Making. New York and London:Plenum Press, 1987, 213-239.10. Michaud, G.R., "Accepting New Technology: Community Relationsfor Mobile Incineration in Illinois" in Garrck, BJ., and Gekler, W.c.,eds. The Analysis, Communication, and Perception of Risk. NewYark: Plenum Press. 1991, 525-530.11 Needleman, c., "Ritualism in Communicating Risk Information" inCox, Jr., L.A., and Ricci, P.F. eds., New Risks. New York and London:Plenum Press, 1990, 259-268.12. Null, M.K., "Establishing Communication with Brookhurst: A CoseStudy in Community Involvement" in Garrick, BJ., and Gekler, W.c.,eds., The Analysis, Communication, and Perception of Risk. NewYork: Plenum Press. 1991, 519-523.13. Renn, 0., "Risk communication and social amplification of risk." inKasperson, R.E., and Stallen, PJ.M., eds. Communicating Risks tothe Public: International Perspectives. Dordrecht: KluwerAcademic Publishers, 1991, 287-327.14. Rogers, G.O., "Public Recognition of Hazard" in Covello, V.T., Lave,L.B., Moghissi, A., and Uppuluri, V.R.R., Uncertainty in RiskAssessment, Risk Management, and Decision Making. New Yorkand London: Plenum Press. 1987, 103-116.15. Ra vetz, J.R., "Public Perceptions of Acceptable Risks as Evidencefor Their Cognitive, Technical, and Social Structure" in Dierkes, M.,Edwards, S., and Coppock, R., eds. Technological Risk: ItsPerception and Handling in the European Community. 1980, 46-47.16. Renn, 0., "Concepts of Risk: A Classification" in Krimsky, S., andGolding, D., eds., Social Theories of Risk. Praeger Publishers. 1992,72-76.17. Renn, 0., and Levine, D., 1988. "Credibility and trust in riskcommunication" in Kasperson R.E., and Stallen, PJ.M., eds.,Communicating Risks to the Public. Dordrecth: Kluwr AcademicPublishers. 1991, 175-218.18. Sevenson, 0., "The time dimension in perception and communicationof risk" in Kasperson, R.E., and Stallen, PJ.M., eds., CommunicatingRisks to the public. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1991,263-285.19. Stallen, PJ.M., "Developing communications about risks of majorindustrial accidents in the Netherlands" in Kasperson, R.E., andStallen, PJ.M., eds. Communicating Risks to the Public:In terna tional Perspecti ves. Dordrech t: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1991, 55-66.20. Sorell, T.L., "Common Methodological Flaws in Risk Assessment" inGarrick, BJ., and Gekler, W.c., eds., The Analysis, Communication,and Perception of Risk. New York: Plenum Press, 1991, 229-235.21. Van der Plight, J., and Borer, J.de., "Contaminated soil: pablicreactions, policy decisions, and risk comn1unication" in Kasperson,R.E., and Stallen, PJ.M., eds., Communicating Risks to the Public.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1991, 129-144. zh_TW