學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 戰後日本之中國研究系譜
The Genealogy of “China Studies” in Post-war Japan
作者 邵軒磊
Shao, Hsyab Lei
貢獻者 石之瑜
Shih, Chih Yu
邵軒磊
Shao, Hsyab Lei
關鍵詞 中國研究
方法論
亞洲學
系譜學
典範分析
社會主義
學術社群
戰後日本
Academic Community
History of Post-war Japan
East Asian Studies
China-study
Genealogy
Marxism,
Methodology
Regime analyze
日期 2008
上傳時間 9-五月-2016 13:29:37 (UTC+8)
摘要 當代「日本中國認識」1945年二次大戰結束面臨一次重大轉折。戰後開始的「中國研究」主要受到日本對於自身認同重建的看法;以及冷戰國際架構的影響。本文藉由「系譜學方法」,回溯戰後半世紀以來,日本對中國的研究角度經過什麼樣的變化?中日研究群體如何開展及互動?本文發現日本當地中國研究的典範演變,最初是因應西方現代學科的需要,以建立歷史理論與史觀。戰前以東洋史學與區域調查為主要典範。此兩種團體延續到戰後成為史學與區域研究兩種系譜。戰後初期(1945-54)佔有主要論述空間的是左派革命史觀研究群體,主要學術產出是實態調查、社會史方面的資料。第二階段(1955-64)是馬克思主義者對近代化論者,延續戰爭責任論爭中的研究主體問題。第三階段(1965-74)是隨著日本自身發展與文革演進,研究者依照對文革態度而分裂,自此主流是對經濟、政治、國際關係的研究。第四階段(1975-84)民國史觀強調社會主義中國與傳統中國以及中國與周邊國家的「雙重連續性」,這兩個思考脈絡最後集成為溝口的基體論與濱下的體系論。另外出現以近代化(民主化經濟發展)短暫的成為主要論述,之後隨著前兩者理論對西式近代的否定,開始找尋「亞洲價值」。第五階段(1985-94),面臨昭和年代與冷戰結束兩個重要分期,日本學界提出新亞洲學,強調區域多元性以及混成亞洲統合兩大觀念。新亞洲學中,不可避免的也繼承了戰前亞洲學的基本要素。綜觀而言,本研究不僅能提供對中國研究途徑更多的參考面向,也能為台灣的中國大陸研究學界提供更多元的研究方法,更能有助於對當代東亞局勢的瞭解。
Modern “China studies” (sinology, modern china study, etc.) in Japan began in 1945, the end of Pacific War. It was in a very complicated situation because on the one hand, it must take mission on the revival of national confidence. On the other hand, it was influenced by post-war international system. This article attempts to analyze “Japanese China study” from a genealogical perspective. The article also tries to depict the “genealogy” of academic communities of Japanese China study and their research approaches. It is found that the paradigm change began in the need of discipline modernization,in order to build their historical theory and historical views. Two mainstreams before WWII are “touyougaku (orientalism)” and “regional study”. They became two major studies, “history” and “regional science” after war. In the first period (1945-54), the leading group “revolution historian’ (Marxist or lefters) accomplished much research about “village investigation” and social history. In the second period (1955-64), Marxist (lefters) and Modernist debated the question of “research subjectivity” regarding war responsibility. In the third period (1965-74), researcher groups were affected by Culture Revolution, and became radical. After this deep confliction, they became neutral,and advocated to study economics, politics, and international relations of China. In the fourth period (1975-84), “R.O.C. perspective” emphasized “double continuity “ existing between socialist China and traditional China, and between core and periphery China, consisting of “Mizokuchi theory” and “Hamashita theory”. On the other hand, modernization (development theory) also rose up, considering Asian value as opposite of Western value. Therefore, in the fifth period (1985-94), facing the end of Showa period and cold war, scholars start to assert New Asianism, emphasizing diversity and cooperation among Asian countries. We could discover that New Asianism is similar to wartime Asianism, which is a symbol of Japanese China study that time. This study will not only clarify the Sinology in other culture, but also bring more approaches for scholars in Taiwan.
描述 博士
國立政治大學
東亞研究所
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093260505
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 石之瑜zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Shih, Chih Yuen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 邵軒磊zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Shao, Hsyab Leien_US
dc.creator (作者) 邵軒磊zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Shao, Hsyab Leien_US
dc.date (日期) 2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned 9-五月-2016 13:29:37 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-五月-2016 13:29:37 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-五月-2016 13:29:37 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0093260505en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/94959en_US
dc.description (描述) 博士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 東亞研究所zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 當代「日本中國認識」1945年二次大戰結束面臨一次重大轉折。戰後開始的「中國研究」主要受到日本對於自身認同重建的看法;以及冷戰國際架構的影響。本文藉由「系譜學方法」,回溯戰後半世紀以來,日本對中國的研究角度經過什麼樣的變化?中日研究群體如何開展及互動?本文發現日本當地中國研究的典範演變,最初是因應西方現代學科的需要,以建立歷史理論與史觀。戰前以東洋史學與區域調查為主要典範。此兩種團體延續到戰後成為史學與區域研究兩種系譜。戰後初期(1945-54)佔有主要論述空間的是左派革命史觀研究群體,主要學術產出是實態調查、社會史方面的資料。第二階段(1955-64)是馬克思主義者對近代化論者,延續戰爭責任論爭中的研究主體問題。第三階段(1965-74)是隨著日本自身發展與文革演進,研究者依照對文革態度而分裂,自此主流是對經濟、政治、國際關係的研究。第四階段(1975-84)民國史觀強調社會主義中國與傳統中國以及中國與周邊國家的「雙重連續性」,這兩個思考脈絡最後集成為溝口的基體論與濱下的體系論。另外出現以近代化(民主化經濟發展)短暫的成為主要論述,之後隨著前兩者理論對西式近代的否定,開始找尋「亞洲價值」。第五階段(1985-94),面臨昭和年代與冷戰結束兩個重要分期,日本學界提出新亞洲學,強調區域多元性以及混成亞洲統合兩大觀念。新亞洲學中,不可避免的也繼承了戰前亞洲學的基本要素。綜觀而言,本研究不僅能提供對中國研究途徑更多的參考面向,也能為台灣的中國大陸研究學界提供更多元的研究方法,更能有助於對當代東亞局勢的瞭解。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Modern “China studies” (sinology, modern china study, etc.) in Japan began in 1945, the end of Pacific War. It was in a very complicated situation because on the one hand, it must take mission on the revival of national confidence. On the other hand, it was influenced by post-war international system. This article attempts to analyze “Japanese China study” from a genealogical perspective. The article also tries to depict the “genealogy” of academic communities of Japanese China study and their research approaches. It is found that the paradigm change began in the need of discipline modernization,in order to build their historical theory and historical views. Two mainstreams before WWII are “touyougaku (orientalism)” and “regional study”. They became two major studies, “history” and “regional science” after war. In the first period (1945-54), the leading group “revolution historian’ (Marxist or lefters) accomplished much research about “village investigation” and social history. In the second period (1955-64), Marxist (lefters) and Modernist debated the question of “research subjectivity” regarding war responsibility. In the third period (1965-74), researcher groups were affected by Culture Revolution, and became radical. After this deep confliction, they became neutral,and advocated to study economics, politics, and international relations of China. In the fourth period (1975-84), “R.O.C. perspective” emphasized “double continuity “ existing between socialist China and traditional China, and between core and periphery China, consisting of “Mizokuchi theory” and “Hamashita theory”. On the other hand, modernization (development theory) also rose up, considering Asian value as opposite of Western value. Therefore, in the fifth period (1985-94), facing the end of Showa period and cold war, scholars start to assert New Asianism, emphasizing diversity and cooperation among Asian countries. We could discover that New Asianism is similar to wartime Asianism, which is a symbol of Japanese China study that time. This study will not only clarify the Sinology in other culture, but also bring more approaches for scholars in Taiwan.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第壹章 序章--研究緣起....................................................................................................................... 1 一、研究背景................................................................................................................................................... 1 二、先行研究與研究目的................................................................................................................................ 4 (一)台灣的先行研究............................................................................................................................................... 5 (二)大陸學界的先行研究....................................................................................................................................... 7 (三)日本的先行研究............................................................................................................................................... 9 (四)先行研究分析與問題意識.............................................................................................................................. 11 表一:整體性「現代中國研究」先行研究整理.......................................................................... 11 (五)研究目的與問題設計:................................................................................................................................. 13 表二:本文研究目的與預期貢獻................................................................................................. 14 三、研究架構................................................................................................................................................. 14 (一)研究對象......................................................................................................................................................... 15 (二)研究方法......................................................................................................................................................... 17 1.思維基礎:知識系譜學.......................................................................................................................................... 17 表三:本研究使用系譜學的三層意義......................................................................................... 18 2.操作方法一:典範研究.......................................................................................................................................... 19 3.操作方法二:論述研究.......................................................................................................................................... 20 (三)研究架構與章節安排..................................................................................................................................... 21 圖一:章節安排圖解..................................................................................................................... 24 四、預期成果................................................................................................................................................. 24 圖二、研究架構圖解..................................................................................................................... 25 第貳章 戰前日本之中國研究系譜..................................................................................................... 26 一、研究背景與文獻回顧.............................................................................................................................. 26 表五、學界對東洋學評價一覽表................................................................................................. 27 二、作為學科的東洋學—與日本儒學對立.................................................................................................. 29 (一)、從儒學到東洋學........................................................................................................................................... 30 (二)、從東洋學到東洋史....................................................................................................................................... 32 表六、東洋史戰前主要論爭一覽表............................................................................................. 34 三、京都學派東洋史學................................................................................................................................. 34 表七、東京學派與京都學派的區分............................................................................................. 35 四、調查與區域研究方法.............................................................................................................................. 36 五、做為中國研究源流的東洋史.................................................................................................................. 38 (一)時間:馬克思主義→近代論系譜.................................................................................................................. 38 (二)空間:區域研究→亞洲論系譜...................................................................................................................... 39 六、小結:重新評價戰前東洋史.................................................................................................................. 39 圖三、現代中國研究系譜中的東洋史學...................................................................................... 40 第參章 戰後初期中國研究的延續與斷裂(1945-1955) ............................................................... 42 一、研究背景................................................................................................................................................. 42 表八:戰後中國研究特色背景分析比較...................................................................................... 43 二、1940 年代後半:研究者的延續............................................................................................................. 44 (一)區域研究:以戰時調查研究為中心.............................................................................................................. 44 表九、中國研究所理事分配......................................................................................................... 45 (二)史學方面:「近代」意義的轉變.................................................................................................................... 46 (三)東洋文哲學戰後發展..................................................................................................................................... 48 三、1950 年代:馬克思主義時期................................................................................................................. 49 (一)認識論:革命史觀......................................................................................................................................... 50 (二)論爭:時代區分論......................................................................................................................................... 52 表九、京都學派(內藤湖南)分期............................................................................................. 52 表十、重要時代區分論爭............................................................................................................. 53 (三)受社會主義影響的區域研究.......................................................................................................................... 54 四、小結......................................................................................................................................................... 56 圖四、戰後中國研究系譜(第一期) ......................................................................................... 57 第肆章 美式區域研究與福特基金會事件(1953-1968) ............................................................... 59 一、研究背景................................................................................................................................................. 59 二、區域研究:近代化史觀.......................................................................................................................... 60 (一)科學與研究的道德性..................................................................................................................................... 61 (二)美式社會科學與美式近代化.......................................................................................................................... 62 三、史學:近代化論與資本主義起源.......................................................................................................... 64 表十一、中國資本主義起源相關研究......................................................................................... 65 四、AF 事件始末.......................................................................................................................................... 66 表十二:AF 事件中正反立場表................................................................................................... 68 五、文革前革命史觀論爭.............................................................................................................................. 69 表十三、戰後四次對革命史觀的挑戰......................................................................................... 71 六、結論:AF 事件對中國學界的衝擊與評價........................................................................................... 72 圖五、1955-65 日本中國研究系譜圖........................................................................................... 73 第伍章 世代交替下的主體性(1965-1974) ................................................................................... 76 一、研究背景................................................................................................................................................. 76 二、民族人類學、比較政治的輸入.............................................................................................................. 77 三、學術社群的自我批判浪潮...................................................................................................................... 80 表十四、AF 事件與文革自我批判論述比較............................................................................... 81 四、革命史觀退潮與「過渡期」.................................................................................................................. 82 表十五、文革對日本中國觀的影響............................................................................................. 83 五、後文革學術社群重組.............................................................................................................................. 85 (一)內部學術社群分裂......................................................................................................................................... 85 (二)與中國學術社群交流..................................................................................................................................... 86 六、小結......................................................................................................................................................... 87 圖六、1965-75 系譜圖示............................................................................................................... 88 第陸章 戰後第二典範轉型期(1975-1984) ................................................................................... 90 一、研究背景................................................................................................................................................. 90 表十七:中國研究轉型期特色之先驅研究比較.......................................................................... 91 二、史學:以實證研究再檢視...................................................................................................................... 93 (一)革命史觀到民國史觀..................................................................................................................................... 93 表十八、史觀比較......................................................................................................................... 94 (二)再評價風潮..................................................................................................................................................... 95 (三)農村社會論..................................................................................................................................................... 98 三、區域研究:對新的研究方法的嘗試與突破.......................................................................................... 99 表十九、重要方法論的論文....................................................................................................... 101 四、小結:亞洲學的誕生環境—模糊的中國............................................................................................ 102 圖七、1975-84 系譜圖解............................................................................................................. 102 第柒章 以亞洲學迎接後冷戰(1985-1994) ................................................................................. 105 一、研究背景............................................................................................................................................... 105 二、理論體系的再建--從再評價到全面性理論......................................................................................... 106 (一)溝口亞洲基體論........................................................................................................................................... 106 (二)濱下朝貢體系論........................................................................................................................................... 108 圖八、濱下武志朝貢體系概念圖............................................................................................... 109 圖九、濱下亞洲海域概念圖....................................................................................................... 110 三、從區域研究到田野研究.........................................................................................................................111 四、現狀研究的風潮................................................................................................................................... 114 五、小結:後冷戰亞洲學的復興................................................................................................................ 116 圖十、1975-84 系譜圖解............................................................................................................. 117 第捌章 結論--從東洋學到亞洲學....................................................................................................119 一、亞洲學的根源....................................................................................................................................... 120 (一)戰前:日本=亞洲....................................................................................................................................... 120 (二)戰後缺席的「亞洲學」................................................................................................................................ 123 二、新亞洲學=東洋學+α=中國+α ....................................................................................................... 125 (一)從朝貢體系到新亞洲學................................................................................................................................ 125 表二十、現代亞洲學的六大亞洲觀........................................................................................... 127 (二)新舊亞洲學比較........................................................................................................................................... 128 表二十一、新區域主義比較概念圖........................................................................................... 128 三、結論:戰後日本之中國研究系譜........................................................................................................ 130 圖十一、戰後中國研究系譜總覽............................................................................................... 130 參考書目............................................................................................................................................ 134 (一)英文書籍與期刊文獻........................................................................................................................ 134 (二)日文書籍與期刊文獻........................................................................................................................ 134 (三)中文書籍與期刊文獻........................................................................................................................ 150zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093260505en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中國研究zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 方法論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 亞洲學zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 系譜學zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 典範分析zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學術社群zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 戰後日本zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Academic Communityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) History of Post-war Japanen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) East Asian Studiesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) China-studyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Genealogyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Marxism,en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Methodologyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Regime analyzeen_US
dc.title (題名) 戰後日本之中國研究系譜zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Genealogy of “China Studies” in Post-war Japanen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesis-