學術產出-期刊論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 康德、胡塞爾和謝勒在倫理學建基問題上的爭執
其他題名 The Dispute of Kant, Husserl and Scheler Regarding the Foundation of Ethics
作者 張偉
ZHANG, Wei
關鍵詞 理性先天; 情感先天; 倫理學的建基; 康德; 胡塞爾
Rational a Priori; Emotional a Priori; the Foundation of Ethics; I. Kant; E. Husserl
日期 2012-07
上傳時間 11-八月-2016 16:07:58 (UTC+8)
摘要 藉由倫理學開端上的初始爭論人們可以追問:倫理學究竟建基於理性或是情感?在康德倫理學中,通過道德判斷原則和道德執行原則的區分,他規定了理性和情感在倫理學中各自的功能,並且最終堅持倫理學的理性先天原則。然而,胡塞爾和謝勒卻宣稱,康德沒有認清情感領域中的先天本質法則性。相對於康德,他們通過質料先天理論揭示了情感領域中的先天性。但與胡塞爾繼續高舉理性大旗,終而將倫理學視為「第二哲學」不同,謝勒張揚了情感的獨立性、原本性,並將其倫理學建基於此種先天-情感之上,據此堅持了現象學倫理學的絕對的、第一性地位。
Due to the dispute on the origin of ethics, one can ask such a question, whether ethics is grounded on reason or feeling/emotion. In Kant’s ethics, he determined the functions of reason and feeling/emotion in ethics by the distinction of the principle of judgment of morality and the principle of execution of morality, and eventually held to a principle of “rational a priori”. However, Husserl and Scheler believed that Kant disregarded the a priori essential laws of feeling. In contrast with Kant, they revealed the a priori in the fields of feeling/emotion by the theory of material a priori. Husserl held the flag of reason high and finally regarded ethics as “secondary philosophy”. But Scheler did not follow him. He revealed the independence and primacy of feeling/emotion, and founded his ethics on the apriori-emotion. Thus, he held on the absolute, primary status of the phenomenological ethics.
關聯 政治大學哲學學報, 28, 131-180
The national Chengchi university philosophical
資料類型 article
dc.creator (作者) 張偉zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) ZHANG, Wei
dc.date (日期) 2012-07
dc.date.accessioned 11-八月-2016 16:07:58 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-八月-2016 16:07:58 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-八月-2016 16:07:58 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=113241-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 藉由倫理學開端上的初始爭論人們可以追問:倫理學究竟建基於理性或是情感?在康德倫理學中,通過道德判斷原則和道德執行原則的區分,他規定了理性和情感在倫理學中各自的功能,並且最終堅持倫理學的理性先天原則。然而,胡塞爾和謝勒卻宣稱,康德沒有認清情感領域中的先天本質法則性。相對於康德,他們通過質料先天理論揭示了情感領域中的先天性。但與胡塞爾繼續高舉理性大旗,終而將倫理學視為「第二哲學」不同,謝勒張揚了情感的獨立性、原本性,並將其倫理學建基於此種先天-情感之上,據此堅持了現象學倫理學的絕對的、第一性地位。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Due to the dispute on the origin of ethics, one can ask such a question, whether ethics is grounded on reason or feeling/emotion. In Kant’s ethics, he determined the functions of reason and feeling/emotion in ethics by the distinction of the principle of judgment of morality and the principle of execution of morality, and eventually held to a principle of “rational a priori”. However, Husserl and Scheler believed that Kant disregarded the a priori essential laws of feeling. In contrast with Kant, they revealed the a priori in the fields of feeling/emotion by the theory of material a priori. Husserl held the flag of reason high and finally regarded ethics as “secondary philosophy”. But Scheler did not follow him. He revealed the independence and primacy of feeling/emotion, and founded his ethics on the apriori-emotion. Thus, he held on the absolute, primary status of the phenomenological ethics.
dc.format.extent 588132 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 政治大學哲學學報, 28, 131-180
dc.relation (關聯) The national Chengchi university philosophical
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 理性先天; 情感先天; 倫理學的建基; 康德; 胡塞爾
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Rational a Priori; Emotional a Priori; the Foundation of Ethics; I. Kant; E. Husserl
dc.title (題名) 康德、胡塞爾和謝勒在倫理學建基問題上的爭執zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) The Dispute of Kant, Husserl and Scheler Regarding the Foundation of Ethics
dc.type (資料類型) article