學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 萬變不離其宗： 建立台灣華語中英語借字之機率感知語法
Where variation vanishes : constructing the stochastic perception grammar for English loanwords in Taiwan Mandarin作者 呂明昌
Lu, Mingchang貢獻者 蕭宇超
Hsiao, Yuchao E.
呂明昌
Lu, Mingchang關鍵詞 借字調整
感知
詞彙變異
機率感知語法
訊號制約
Loanword adaptation
Perception
Lexical variation
SPG
Cue constraint日期 2017 上傳時間 1-三月-2017 17:01:03 (UTC+8) 摘要 觀察台灣華語中英語借字的輔音調整，得以窺見一系列由感知顯著性之差異所誘發的借字調整傾向。此感知顯著性或許屬於該輔音本身之內在聲學特質，抑或源自於由該輔音所在之環境所提供之外部感知訊號。儘管存在著調整傾向，借入語言調整者針對調整策略之決定，例如元音加插或輔音刪除，卻幾乎沒有絕對之調整形態。這些調整能夠修正不合法的借出語言結構，使之遵守借入語言相對較為嚴格之音韻規範。本論文正視此借字調整所浮現之詞彙變異性，以結構性制約及訊號制約所構成的單一機率感知語法（stochastic perception grammar, SPG）將其形式化，而非視之為核心形式分析中之異常。此機制以機率優選理論（stochastic OT, Boersma 1997, 1998; Boersma and Hayes 2001）之制約覆蓋範圍及重疊等重要觀念為基礎，重新定義制約之互動：藉由各種變異值在二元變異及多元變異中發生機率之分配，設計出可計算制約排序值的數學運算方式。此單一化之SPG不僅臻於理論簡易性之目標，並具備優越性，可將借字音韻中由感知所驅使之調整形態，做出明確之量化預測。
Consonant adaptation in Taiwan Mandarin (TM) loanwords from English reveals a series of tendencies that are majorly induced by degrees of perceptual salience pertaining either to the innate acoustic properties of the target consonant per se, or to external perceptual cues provided by the context where the consonant resides. Despite these inclinations, there is hardly any absoluteness in the L1 adapter’s determination of strategy, such as vowel insertion or consonant deletion, that works to repair the forbidden L2 structure to fit it into the relatively severe restrictions of the native phonotactics. Rather than treating it as exceptional to the core of formal analyses, this dissertation takes the lexical variation emerging from loanword adaptation seriously and couches it within a single stochastic perception grammar (SPG), of which the main ingredients are structural and cue constraints. This mechanism redefines constraint interaction through the key notions of constraint coverage and overlapping, designed in stochastic OT (Boersma 1997, 1998; Boersma and Hayes 2001), by providing mathematical operations that aim at figuring out the ranking values of constraints based on the percentage distribution of the variants’ occurrences in both binary and multiple variations. The unified SPG not simply achieves theoretical simplicity but excels in making specific quantitative prediction of the perceptually inspired adaptation patterns in loanword phonology.參考文獻 Ahn, Sang-Cheol. 1998. An Introduction to Korean Phonology. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.Alderete, John. 1995. Faithfulness to prosodic heads. ROA-94.Alderete, John. 2001. Dominance effects as transderivational anti-faithfulness. Phonology 18:201-253. Anttila, Arto. 1997. Deriving variation from grammar. Variation, Change and Phonological Theory, eds. by Frans Hinskens, Roeland van Hout, and Leo Wetzels, 35-68. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Anttila, Arto. 2000. Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. ROA-425–1000. Anttila, Arto. 2002. Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20:1-42.Batistella, Edwin. 1990. Markedness: The evaluative superstructure of language. Albany: SUNY Press.Bauer, Robert S. and Paul K. Benedict. 1997. Modern Cantonese Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Beckman, Jill. 1997. Positional faithfulness, positional neutralization, and Shona vowel harmony. Phonology 14.1:1-46.Beckman, Jill. 1998. Positional Faithfulness. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Bickford, Anita C. and Rick Floyd. 2006. Articulatory Phonetics: Tools for Analyzing the World’s Languages. SIL International. Boersma, Paul. 1997. How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences, 21:43-58. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Boersma, Paul. 1998. Functional Phonology: Formalizing the Interactions between Articulatory and Perceptual Drives. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Boersma, Paul. 2000. The OCP in the perception grammar. ROA-435. Boersma, Paul, and Bruce Hayes. 2001. Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32.1:45-86.Boersma, Paul. 2006. Prototypically judgments as inverted perception. In Gradience in grammar, eds. by Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry, Matthias Schlesewsky and Ralf Vogel, 167-184. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Boersma, Paul. 2007a. Some listener-oriented accounts of h-aspiré in French. Lingua 117:1989-2054. Boersma, Paul. 2007b. Cue constraints and their interaction in phonological perception and production. ROA-944. Boersma, Paul and Hamann, Silke. 2009. Loanword adaptation as first-language phonological perception. In Loan Phonology, eds. by Andrea Calabrese and W. Leo Wetzels, 11-58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Brasington, Ron. 1997. Cost and benefit in loanword adaptation. In Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 3, eds. by Yan Huang, Richard Ingham, Paul Kerswill, and Linda Shockey, 1-19. Department of Linguistic Science, The University of Reading. Retrieved August 11, 2005, from http://www.personal.rdg.ac.uk/ ~llsling1/papers/Cost.of.a.loan.pdf.Broselow, Ellen. 2004. Language contact phonology: richness of the stimulus, poverty of the base. Proceedings of the North-Eastern Linguistic Society 34:1-22. Broselow, Ellen. 2009. Stress adaptation in loanword phonology: Perception and learnability. In Phonology in perception, eds. by Paul Boersma and Silke Hamann, 191–234. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Byrd, Dani. 1992. Perception of assimilation in consonant clusters: A gestural model. Phonetica 49:1-24.Calabrese, Andrea. 1988. Towards a theory of phonological alphabets. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Calabrese, Andrea. 1995. A constraint-based theory of phonological markedness and simplification procedures. Linguistic Inquiry 26.2:373-463.Calabrese, Andrea. 2009. Perception, production and acoustic inputs in loanword phonology. In Loan Phonology, eds. by Andrea Calabrese and W. Leo Wetzels, 59-113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Casali, Rod. 1996. Resolving hiatus. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Chang, Zhuting and Dianne Bradley. 2012. Tonal assignment for English loanwords in Mandarin: an experimental approach. Abstract for oral presentation in Cuny Graduate Center.Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle. 1968. The sound patterns of English. New York: Harper and Row.Cheng, Chin-Chuan. 1973. A synchronic Phonology of Mandarin Chinese. The Hague: Mouton.Clements, G. N. 2001. Representational economy in constraint-based phonology. In Distinctive feature theory, ed. by T. Alan Hall, 71–146. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Connelly, Mark. 1994. Phonological Markedness and Second Language Error Interpretation. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. Coetzee, Andries W. 2006. Variation as accessing ‘non-optimal’ candidates. Phonology 23:337-385.Davidson, Lisa and Rolf Noyer. 1997. Loan phonology in Huave: Nativization and the ranking of faithfulness constraints. In The Proceedings of the 15th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, eds. by Brian Agbayani, and Sze-Wing Tang. Stanford, 65-79. CA: Center Study Language and Information.Dong, Xiaoli. 2012. What borrowing buys us: A study of Mandarin Loanword Phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University. Duanmu, San. 1990. A formal study of syllable, tone, stress and domain in Chinese languages. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Dunamu, San. 2000. The Phonology of Standard Chinese. NY: Oxford University Press.Dunamu, San. 2007. The Phonology of Standard Chinese. 2nd Edition. NY: Oxford University Press.Dupoux, Emmanuel, Kazuhiko Kakehi, Yuki Hirose, Christophe Pallier, and Jacques Mehler. 1999. Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25:1568–1578.Dupoux, Emmanuel, Sharon Peperkamp, and Núria Sebastián-Gallés. 2001. A robust method to study stress “deafness”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110:1606-1618.Escudero, Paola. 2005. Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.Espy-Wilson, Carol Y. 1992. Acoustic measures for linguistic features distinguishing the semivowels /w j r l/ in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 92:736-757. Fleischhacker, Heidi. 2005. Similarity in phonology: Evidence from reduplication and loan adaptation. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.傅懋勣 (Fu, Maoji)。1956。北京話的音位和拼音字母 (Phonemes and pinyin symbols in the Beijing speech)。中國語文 1956.3：3-12。Gebéto, Flavuen. 1999. Les emprunts linguistiques d’ origine européene en Fon. Kölin: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Gussenhoven, Carlos and Haike Jacobs. 1998. Understanding Phonology. London: Arnold.Hancin-Bhatt and Barbara Jean. 1994. Segment transfer: A consequence of a dynamic system. Second Language Research 10:241–269.Hayes, Bruce. 2009. Introductory Phonology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Herd, Jonathon. 2005. Loanword adaptation and the evaluation of similarity. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 24:65–116. Hsiao, Yuchao. 2011. Universal marking in accent formation: evidence from Taiwanese-Mandarin and Mandarin-Taiwanese. Lingua 121:1485-1517.Hsieh, Feng-fan and Michael Kenstowicz. 2008. Phonetic knowledge in tonal adaptation: Mandarin and English loanwords in Lhasa Tibetan. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17:279-297.Hsieh, Feng-fan, Michael Kenstowicz, and Xiaomin Mou. 2009. Mandarin adaptation of coda nasals in English loanwords. In Loan Phonology, eds. by Andrea Calabrese and W. Leo Wetzels, 131-154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Hume, Elizabeth. 2003. Language specific markedness: The case of place of articulation. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 9(2):295-310.Hyman, Larry. 1970. The role of borrowing in justification of phonological grammars. Studies in African Linguistics 1:1-48.Ingram, John C. L. and See-Gyoon Park. 1998. Language, context, and speaker effects in the identification and discrimination of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese and Korean listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103:1161-1174.Inkelas, Sharon. 1998. The theoretical status of morphologically conditioned phonology: a case study from dominance. In Yearbook of Morphology 1997, eds. by Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle. Amsterdam: Springer.Inkelas, Sharon and Cheryl Zoll. 2005. Reduplication: Doubling in Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Inkelas, Sharon and Cheryl Zoll. 2007. Is grammar independence real? A comparison between cophonological and indexed constraint approaches to morphologically conditioned phonology. Linguistics 45.1:133-171.Itô, Junko and Armin Mester. 1995. Japanese phonology. In The handbook of phonological theory, ed. by John A. Goldsmith. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.Jacobs, Haike and Carlos Gussenhoven. 2000. Loan phonology: Perception, salience, the lexicon and OT. In Optimality Theory: Phonology, syntax, and acquisition, eds. by Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw and Jeroen van de Weijer, 193-210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Jun, Jongho. 1995. Place assimilation as the result of conflicting perceptual and articulatory constraints. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference of Formal Linguistics 14, 221-237.Kang, Yoonjung. 2003. Perceptual similarity in loanword adaptation: English postvocalic word-final stops in Korean. Phonology 20:219-273.Kang, Yoonjung. 2011. Loanword phonology. In Companion to Phonology, eds. by van Oostendorp, Marc, Colin Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Keren Rice. Wiley-Blackwell.Kenstowicz, Michael and Hyang-Sook Sohn. 2001. Accentual adaptation in North Kyungsang Korean. In Ken Hale. A Life in Language ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 239-270. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Kenstowicz, Michael. 2003a. Salience and similarity in loanword adaptation: a case study from Fijian. Manuscript, MIT.Kenstowicz, Michael. 2003b. The role of perception in loanword phonology. A review of Les emprunts linguistiques d’origine europénne en Fon by Flavien Gbéto, Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag, 2000. Studies in African Linguistics 32:95-112. Kenstowicz, Michael 2005. The phonetics and phonology of loanword adaptation. In Proceedings of ECKL 1: Proceedings of 1st European Conference on Korean Linguistics, ed. by S.-J. Rhee, 17–32. Seoul: Hankook Publishing Co.Kim, Hyunsoon. 1998. A phonetic characterization of release and nonrelease: the case of Korean and English. Language Research 34:347-368. Kim, Hyunsoon. 2008. Loanword adaptation between Japanese and Korean: Evidence for L1 feature-driven perception. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17:331–346.Kim, Hyunsoon. 2009. Korean adaptation of English affricates and fricatives in a feature-driven model of loanword adaptation. In Loan Phonology, eds. by Andrea Calabrese and W. Leo Wetzels, 155-180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Kiparsky, Paul. 1993. Variable rules. Handouts distributed at the Rutgers Optimality Workshop (ROW1).Kiu, K.L. 1977. Tonal rules for English loanwords in Cantonese. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 7:17-22. Kubozono, Haruo. 2006. Where does loanword prosody come from? A case study of Japanese loanword accent. Lingua 116:1140-1170.Labrune, Laurence. 2002. The prosodic structure of simple abbreviated loanwords in Japanese: a constraint-based account. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 6.1:98-120.LaCharité, Darlene and Carole Paradis. 2005. Category preservation and proximity versus phonetic approximation in loanword adaptation. Linguistic Inquiry 36:223-258.Ladefoged, Peter. 2001. A course in phonetics. 4th ed. Fort Worth, Tex: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.Lombardi, Linda. 1991. Laryngeal features and laryngeal neutralization. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Lombardi, Linda. 1996. Positional faithfulness and the phonology of voice assimilation in Optimality Theory. MA Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.Lombardi, Linda. 1999. Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17:267-302.Lombardi, Linda. 2001. Why Place and Voice are different: constraint-specific alternations in Optimality Theory. In Segmental phonology in Optimality Theory: Constraints and Representations, ed. by Linda Lombardi, 13-45. Cambridge University Press.Lin, Yen-Hwei. 2007a. Loanword adaptation of English vowels in standard Mandarin. In NACCL-18: Proceedings of the 18th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, ed. by Janet Xing, 331-342. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.Lin, Yen-Hwei. 2007b. The Sounds of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Lin, Yen-Hwei. 2008a. Variable vowel adaptation in Standard Mandarin loanwords. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17:363-380. Lin, Yen-Hwei. 2008b. Patterned vowels variation in Standard Mandarin loanword adaptation: Evidence from a dictionary corpus. In NACCL-20: Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, eds. by Marjorie Chan and Hana Kang, 175-184. Columbus, Ohio: East Asian Studies Center, The Ohio State University.Liu Zhengtan, Gao Mingkai, Mai Yongqian and Shi Yowei. 1984. Dictionary of Loanwords and Hybrid Words in Chinese. Shanghai cishu chubanshe, Shanghai.Lu, Mingchang. 2006. An Optimality Theory Approach to English and Southern Min Loanwords in Mandarin. MA Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan.Lü, Mingchang. 2013. Modeling salience and prosody in loanword adaptation: cases of English [•] in Mandarin. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 39.2:1-32.Luke, Kang-kwong and Chaakming Lau. 2008. On loanword truncation in Cantonese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17:347–362.McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and Reduplicative Identity. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, eds. by Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey and Suzanne Urbanczyk, 249-384. Amherst: GLSA. McCarthy, John J. 2008. Doing Optimality Theory. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.Miao, Ruiqin. 2005. Loanword Adaptation in Mandarin Chinese: Perceptual, Phonological and Sociolinguistic Factors. Doctoral dissertation, Stony Brook University, New York.Nagy, Naomi and William Reynolds. 1994. Optimality theory and variable word-final deletion in Faetar. Paper presented at NWAV-23, Stanford University.Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1996. Sign-based morphology and phonology: with special attention to Optimality Theory. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1998. Cyclic and noncyclic effects in a declarative grammar. In Yearbook of Morphology 1997, eds. by Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle. Amsterdam: Springer. Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1999. Sign-based morphology: a declarative theory of phonology-morphology interleaving. In The Derivational Residue in Phonological Optimality Theory, eds. by Ben Hermans and Marc van Oostendorp. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Orgun, Cemil Orhan and Inkelas, Sharon. 2002. Reconsidering bracket erasure. In Yearbook of Morphology 2001, eds. by Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle. Amsterdam: Springer.Pallier, Christopher, Laura Bosch, Nuria Sebastián-Gallés. 1997. A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition 643:9-17.Paradis, Carole and Jean-François Prunet. 1991. Phonetics and phonology 2: The special status of coronals: internal and external evidence. New York: Academic PressParadis, Carole and Jean-François Prunet. 2000. Nasal vowels as two segments: evidence from borrowings. Language 76:324-357. Paradis, Carole. 1995. Derivational constraints in phonology: Evidence from loanwords and implications. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society, eds. by Audra Dainora, Rachel Hemphill, Barbara Luka, Barbara Need and Sheri Pargman, 360-374. Chicago: CLS.Padgett, Jaye. 1995c. Feature classes. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18. Amherst, MA: GLSA, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts.Paradis, Carole. 1996. The inadequacy of filters and faithfulness in loanword adaptation. In Current Trends in Phonology, eds. by Jacques Durand and Bernard Laks. Salford, 509-534. University of Salford Publications.Paradis, Carole and Darlene LaCharité. 1997. Preservation and minimality in loanword adaptation. Journal of Linguistics 33.1:379-430.Paradis, Carole and Antoine Tremblay. 2009. Nondistinctive features in loanword adaptation. In Loan Phonology, eds. by Andrea Calabrese and W. Leo Wetzels. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Peperkamp, Sharon. 2002a. Towards a new theory of loanword adaptations. MA thesis, University of Paris 8.Peperkamp, Sharon and Emmanuel Dupoux. 2002. Loanword adaptations: Three problems for phonology (and a psycholinguistic solution). Paper presented at the North American Phonology Conference (Naphs), Concordia University, Montreal.Peperkamp, Sharon and Emmanuel Dupoux. 2003. Reinterpreting loanword adaptations: the role of perception. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, eds. by M.J. Solé, D. Recasens and J. Romero, 367-370. Barcelona: Causal Productions.Peperkamp, Sharon. 2005. A psycholinguistic theory of loanword adaptations. BLS 30:341–352.Peperkamp, Sharon, Inga Vendelin, and Kimihiro Nakamura. 2008. On the perceptual origin of loanword adaptations: Experimental evidence from Japanese. Phonology 25:129–164.Pollard, Mark G. 2008. Epenthetic vowel quality in English loanwords in Inuktitut. MA thesis, University of Toronto.Polivanov, Evgenij Dmitrievič. 1931. La perception des sons d’une langue étrangère. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 4:79-96 [English translation: The subjective nature of the perceptions of language sounds. In Selected works: articles on general linguistics, ed. by Polivanov 1994. The Hague: Mouton. 223-237].Prince, Alan. 2002a. Arguing Optimality. ROA-562. Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. Repetti, Lori. 2009. Gemination in English loans in American varieties of Italian. In Loan Phonology, eds. by Andrea Calabrese and W. Leo Wetzels, 225-239.Rice, Keren. 2000. Featural markedness in phonology: variation. GLOT International 4.7, 4.8:3-6, 3-7.Schütz, Albert J. 1978. English loanwords in Fijian. In Fijian language studies: borrowing and pidginization, ed. by Albert J. Schütz, 4:1-50. Bulletin of the Fiji Museum.Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1982. The syllable. In The structure of phonological representations II, eds. by van der Hulst, Harry and Norval Smith, 337-383. Dordrecht: Foris.Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1994. The constraint question for feature structure: a review of some answers. Course materials for Linguistics 730, Fall 1994; University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Shih, Lijen. 2004. Consonantal and Syllabic Adaptations in English Loanwords in Mandarin. MA thesis, Michigan State University, Michigan.Shinohara, Shigeko. 1997. Analyse phonologique de l’adaptation japonaise de mots etrangers. Doctoral dissertation, Universite de Paris III. Shinohara, Shigeko. 2000. Default accentuation and foot structure in Japanese: Evidence from Japanese adaptations from French words. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9:5-96.Shinohara, Shigeko. 2004a. Emergence of universal grammar in foreign word adaptations. In Constraints in Phonological Acquisition, eds. by René Kager, Joe Pater, and Wim Zonneveld, 292-320. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Shinohara, Shigeko. 2004b. Perceptual effects in consonant deletion patterns in loanword phonology. Manuscript, CNRS.Silverman, Daniel. 1992. Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: Evidence from Cantonese. Phonology 9:289-328.Sloos, Marjoleine. 2012. Paper presented at the 2nd Shanghai Phonology and Phonetics Conference, Shanghai, China.Steriade, Donca. 1993. Positional neutralization. Paper presented at the 24th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Steriade, Donca. 2001. Directional asymmetries in place assimilation: A perceptual account. In The role of speech perception in phonology, eds. by Elizabeth Hume and Keith Johnson, 219–250. San Diego: Academic Press.Steriade, Donca. 2008. The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In The nature of the word: Studies in honor of Paul Kiparsky, eds. by Kristin Hanson and Sharon Inkelas, 151–180. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Uffmann, Christian. 2001. Patterns of epenthesis (not only) in Shona loanwords. In Proceedings of HILPS 5, eds. by Caroline Féry, Anthony Dubach Green and Ruben van de Vijver, 193-211. Potsdam: University of Potsdam. Uffmann, Christian. 2004. Vowel epenthesis in loanword phonology. Doctoral dissertation. Phillips-Universität Marburg. Ulrich, Charles H. 1997. Loanword adaptation in Lama: Testing the TCRS model. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 42:415-463.王力 (Wang, Li)。1979。現代漢語語音分析中的幾個問題 (Some problems in the phonetic analysis of modern Chinese)。中國語文 1979.4：281-286。吳瑾瑋 (Wu, Chin-wei)。2006。 現代漢語外來語聲調意義之研究 (The Role of Tone in Mandarin-Chinese Loanwords)。國立台灣師範大學國文學報第四十期：197-219。Wu, Hsiao-hung Iris. 2006. Stress to Tone: a study of tone loans in Mandarin Chinese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 52: 227-253.Yip, Moira. 1993. Cantonese loanword phonology and optimality theory. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1.1:261-291.Yip, Moira. 2002. Necessary but not sufficient: Perceptual loanword influences in loanword phonology. The Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan. Special issue on Aspects of loanword phonology 6.1:4-21.Yip, Moira. 2006. The symbiosis between perception and grammar in loanword phonology. Lingua 116:950-975.張嘉文，主編 (Zhang, Chia-wen, ed.)。2005。辭海 (Encyclopedic Dictionary of Chinese)。台北：鐘文出版社。Zuraw, Kie. 2010. A model of lexical variation and the grammar with application to Tagalog nasal substitution. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 28:417-472. 描述 博士
國立政治大學
語言學研究所
98555502資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098555502 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 蕭宇超 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Hsiao, Yuchao E. en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 呂明昌 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Lu, Mingchang en_US dc.creator (作者) 呂明昌 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Lu, Mingchang en_US dc.date (日期) 2017 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-三月-2017 17:01:03 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-三月-2017 17:01:03 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-三月-2017 17:01:03 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0098555502 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/106803 - dc.description (描述) 博士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 語言學研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 98555502 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 觀察台灣華語中英語借字的輔音調整，得以窺見一系列由感知顯著性之差異所誘發的借字調整傾向。此感知顯著性或許屬於該輔音本身之內在聲學特質，抑或源自於由該輔音所在之環境所提供之外部感知訊號。儘管存在著調整傾向，借入語言調整者針對調整策略之決定，例如元音加插或輔音刪除，卻幾乎沒有絕對之調整形態。這些調整能夠修正不合法的借出語言結構，使之遵守借入語言相對較為嚴格之音韻規範。本論文正視此借字調整所浮現之詞彙變異性，以結構性制約及訊號制約所構成的單一機率感知語法（stochastic perception grammar, SPG）將其形式化，而非視之為核心形式分析中之異常。此機制以機率優選理論（stochastic OT, Boersma 1997, 1998; Boersma and Hayes 2001）之制約覆蓋範圍及重疊等重要觀念為基礎，重新定義制約之互動：藉由各種變異值在二元變異及多元變異中發生機率之分配，設計出可計算制約排序值的數學運算方式。此單一化之SPG不僅臻於理論簡易性之目標，並具備優越性，可將借字音韻中由感知所驅使之調整形態，做出明確之量化預測。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Consonant adaptation in Taiwan Mandarin (TM) loanwords from English reveals a series of tendencies that are majorly induced by degrees of perceptual salience pertaining either to the innate acoustic properties of the target consonant per se, or to external perceptual cues provided by the context where the consonant resides. Despite these inclinations, there is hardly any absoluteness in the L1 adapter’s determination of strategy, such as vowel insertion or consonant deletion, that works to repair the forbidden L2 structure to fit it into the relatively severe restrictions of the native phonotactics. Rather than treating it as exceptional to the core of formal analyses, this dissertation takes the lexical variation emerging from loanword adaptation seriously and couches it within a single stochastic perception grammar (SPG), of which the main ingredients are structural and cue constraints. This mechanism redefines constraint interaction through the key notions of constraint coverage and overlapping, designed in stochastic OT (Boersma 1997, 1998; Boersma and Hayes 2001), by providing mathematical operations that aim at figuring out the ranking values of constraints based on the percentage distribution of the variants’ occurrences in both binary and multiple variations. The unified SPG not simply achieves theoretical simplicity but excels in making specific quantitative prediction of the perceptually inspired adaptation patterns in loanword phonology. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Chapter 1 Introduction1.1 Loanword adaptation……………… 11.2 Categorization of TM adaptations of English loanwords…31.3 The focal points and a bipartite processing model…91.4 Goals and organization of the dissertation…………17Chapter 2 Loanword Phonology and Theoretical Background2.1 Introduction…………………………… 222.2 The diverse views on word-loaning processes………262.2.1 The production-based account… 272.2.2 The perception-based account… 312.2.3 The perception-production account………………… 382.3 Cue constraints………………………492.4 Optimality Theory………………………522.4.1 Universality and Markedness…522.4.2 Violability.......................................... 542.4.3 Markedness and faithfulness: tug of wars……………………542.4.4 The input-output mechanism of OT……………………562.4.5 Demonstration of constraint activities…………572.5 OT-based theories for language variation………592.5.1 Cophonology…………………602.5.2 Rank-ordering of EVAL………652.5.3 Stochastic OT…………………702.6 Two general issues in literature…………762.6.1 Learnability……………………762.6.2 Native phonology vs. loanword phonology………802.7 Conclusion………84Chapter 3 The Sound Systems3.1 Introduction………………………863.2 Consonants………863.2.1 Voicing…………………………893.2.2 Aspiration……………………… 913.2.3 Place of articulation……… 923.3 Vowels…... 943.3.1 High vowels……………………993.3.2 Mid vowels……………………1003.3.3 Low vowels……………………1003.4 Syllable structures………1023.5 Conclusion………103Chapter 4 The Corpus and Patterns4.1 Introduction………………………1054.2 The corpus………1074.3 Simplex onsets……………………1124.3.1 Stops……………………………1124.3.2 Fricatives………………………1164.3.3 Affricates………………………1234.3.4 Nasals…………………………1254.3.5 Liquids………………………1264.4 Complex onsets…………………1274.4.1 The “[]-stop” sequences……1284.4.2 The “[]” sequence………1304.4.3 The “[]-nasal” sequences……1304.4.4 The “obstruent-[]” sequences…1314.4.5 The “stop-[•]” sequences………1324.4.6 The “fricative-[•]” sequences…1344.5 Simplex codas……………………1354.5.1 Stops……………………………1364.5.2 Fricatives..……………………1394.5.3 Affricates………………………1424.5.4 Nasals.…………………………1434.5.5 Liquids…………………………1444.6 Complex codas…………………1474.6.1 The “sibilant-stop” and “stop-sibilant” sequences……1484.6.2 The “fricative-stop” sequence…1504.6.3 The “stop-stop” sequence……1514.6.4 The “nasal-stop” sequences……1524.6.5 The “nasal-fricative” sequence...1544.6.6 The “nasal-affricate” sequence...1544.6.7 The “liquid-consonant” sequences……1544.7 Conclusion………156Chapter 5 Perceptual Effects on English Consonant Interpretation5.1 Introduction……………………………1585.2 Positional influence……………………1605.2.1 Syllable-initial privilege of simplex onsets…1605.2.2 Intermediate status of second/third onsets………1625.2.3 Perceptual weakness of codas…1675.2.4 Interim summary………………1725.3 Asymmetric mappings of stop voicing and aspiration……1725.4 Vowel insertion as perceptual hallucination……………………………1775.5 Effect of universal place-markedness hierarchy………………………1825.6 Nondistinctive voicing of stop codas……1845.7 Coalescence of coronals…………………1875.8 Effect of sonority scale on perception…1905.9 High salience of friction noise…………1925.10 The masking effect of sibilants…………1945.10.1 Onset…………………………1955.10.2 Coda…………………………1965.11 Rhyme Harmony………………………1975.12 Similarity between the nuclear vowel and liquid coda……2015.13 Suprasegmental factors in loanword adaptation……………2035.13.1 The effect of TM prosody on loanword adaptation…………2045.13.2 The role of English stressing in loanword adaptation………2075.14 Conclusion………208Chapter 6 Constructing the SPG for TM Loanword Adaptation6.1 Introduction……………………………2116.2 Calculation of ranking values………2146.2.1 Binary variation……………2146.2.2 Multiple variation……………2176.2.3 Interim summary………………2216.3 Positional influence……………………2216.3.1 An OT Analysis with cue constraints……………2226.3.2 Cue constraints in stochastic evaluation………229 6.3.2.1 Simplex onsets……230 6.3.2.2 Second/third onsets…233 6.3.2.3 Codas………………2356.3.3 Interim summary………………2376.4 Asymmetric mappings of stop voicing and aspiration…………2386.4.1 An OT analysis with cue constraints……………2396.4.2 Cue constraints in stochastic evaluation………2456.4.3 Interim summary………………2496.5 Effect of universal place-markedness hierarchy……………………2506.5.1 An OT analysis with cue constraints………………2516.5.2 Cue constraints in stochastic evaluation………256 6.5.2.1 Labial stop codas………257 6.5.2.2 Dorsal stop codas…………258 6.5.2.3 Coronal stop codas…2606.5.3 Interim summary………………2616.6 Effect of coronal coalescence…………2636.6.1 An OT analysis with cue constraints……………2646.6.2 Cue constraints in stochastic evaluation……2706.6.3 Interim summary………………2736.7 Effect of sonority scale…………………2746.7.1 An OT analysis with cue constraints………………2756.7.2 Cue constraints in stochastic evaluation………279 6.7.2.1 Stop codas…………279 6.7.2.2 [•]-codas……………2806.7.3 Interim summary………………2826.8 High salience of friction noise…………2836.8.1 An OT analysis with cue constraints……………2846.8.2 Cue constraints in stochastic evaluation………287 6.8.2.1 Fricatives……………288 6.8.2.2 Affricates…………2896.8.3 Interim summary………………2906.9 Masking effect of sibilants………………2916.9.1 An OT analysis with cue constraints………2936.9.2 Cue constraints in stochastic evaluation………………………2976.9.3 Interim summary………………2986.10 Effect of Rhyme Harmony………………3006.10.1 An OT analysis with cue constraints……………3016.10.2 Cue constraints in stochastic evaluation………306 6.10.2.1 Analysis of English []-codas in TM…307 6.10.2.2 Analysis of [] and [] rhymes……3086.10.3 Interim summary……………3096.11 Effect of similarity between the nuclear vowel and the liquid coda……3116.11.1 An OT analysis with cue constraints……………3126.11.2 Cue constraints in stochastic evaluation……316 6.11.2.1 V[–back]-liquid…316 6.11.2.2 V[+back]-liquid…3176.11.3 Interim summary……………3186.12 Effect of the native prosody……………3196.12.1 An OT analysis with cue constraints…………3216.12.2 Cue constraints in stochastic evaluation………3246.12.3 Interim summary……………3266.13 Conclusion ……… 327Chapter 7 General Conclusions7.1 Introduction……………………3317.2 Categorization and a bipartite processing model of loanwords…………3327.3 Previous studies on loanword adaptation and language variation………3347.4 The patterns and perceptual accounts…3377.5 Construction of SPG……………………3397.6 Potential challenges to SPG and the perceptual account………3437.6.1 Can the selection points of overlapping constraints have the same value?...................... 3437.6.2 How can SPG predict?.............. 3447.6.3 Can a general constraint contrdict a specific constraint?....... 3467.6.4 What if the ranking between Constraints B and C makes a difference?................................ 3487.6.5 Is it all about orthography?........... 3527.7 Residual problem………………………3537.8 Concluding remarks……………………355 Bibliography…357 zh_TW dc.format.extent 3886976 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098555502 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 借字調整 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 感知 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 詞彙變異 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 機率感知語法 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 訊號制約 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Loanword adaptation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Perception en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Lexical variation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) SPG en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Cue constraint en_US dc.title (題名) 萬變不離其宗： 建立台灣華語中英語借字之機率感知語法 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Where variation vanishes : constructing the stochastic perception grammar for English loanwords in Taiwan Mandarin en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ahn, Sang-Cheol. 1998. An Introduction to Korean Phonology. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.Alderete, John. 1995. Faithfulness to prosodic heads. ROA-94.Alderete, John. 2001. Dominance effects as transderivational anti-faithfulness. Phonology 18:201-253. Anttila, Arto. 1997. Deriving variation from grammar. Variation, Change and Phonological Theory, eds. by Frans Hinskens, Roeland van Hout, and Leo Wetzels, 35-68. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Anttila, Arto. 2000. Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. ROA-425–1000. Anttila, Arto. 2002. Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20:1-42.Batistella, Edwin. 1990. Markedness: The evaluative superstructure of language. Albany: SUNY Press.Bauer, Robert S. and Paul K. Benedict. 1997. Modern Cantonese Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Beckman, Jill. 1997. Positional faithfulness, positional neutralization, and Shona vowel harmony. Phonology 14.1:1-46.Beckman, Jill. 1998. Positional Faithfulness. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Bickford, Anita C. and Rick Floyd. 2006. Articulatory Phonetics: Tools for Analyzing the World’s Languages. SIL International. Boersma, Paul. 1997. How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences, 21:43-58. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Boersma, Paul. 1998. Functional Phonology: Formalizing the Interactions between Articulatory and Perceptual Drives. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Boersma, Paul. 2000. The OCP in the perception grammar. ROA-435. Boersma, Paul, and Bruce Hayes. 2001. Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32.1:45-86.Boersma, Paul. 2006. Prototypically judgments as inverted perception. In Gradience in grammar, eds. by Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry, Matthias Schlesewsky and Ralf Vogel, 167-184. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Boersma, Paul. 2007a. Some listener-oriented accounts of h-aspiré in French. Lingua 117:1989-2054. Boersma, Paul. 2007b. Cue constraints and their interaction in phonological perception and production. ROA-944. Boersma, Paul and Hamann, Silke. 2009. Loanword adaptation as first-language phonological perception. In Loan Phonology, eds. by Andrea Calabrese and W. Leo Wetzels, 11-58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Brasington, Ron. 1997. Cost and benefit in loanword adaptation. In Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 3, eds. by Yan Huang, Richard Ingham, Paul Kerswill, and Linda Shockey, 1-19. Department of Linguistic Science, The University of Reading. Retrieved August 11, 2005, from http://www.personal.rdg.ac.uk/ ~llsling1/papers/Cost.of.a.loan.pdf.Broselow, Ellen. 2004. Language contact phonology: richness of the stimulus, poverty of the base. Proceedings of the North-Eastern Linguistic Society 34:1-22. Broselow, Ellen. 2009. Stress adaptation in loanword phonology: Perception and learnability. In Phonology in perception, eds. by Paul Boersma and Silke Hamann, 191–234. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Byrd, Dani. 1992. Perception of assimilation in consonant clusters: A gestural model. Phonetica 49:1-24.Calabrese, Andrea. 1988. Towards a theory of phonological alphabets. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Calabrese, Andrea. 1995. A constraint-based theory of phonological markedness and simplification procedures. Linguistic Inquiry 26.2:373-463.Calabrese, Andrea. 2009. Perception, production and acoustic inputs in loanword phonology. In Loan Phonology, eds. by Andrea Calabrese and W. Leo Wetzels, 59-113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Casali, Rod. 1996. Resolving hiatus. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Chang, Zhuting and Dianne Bradley. 2012. Tonal assignment for English loanwords in Mandarin: an experimental approach. Abstract for oral presentation in Cuny Graduate Center.Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle. 1968. The sound patterns of English. New York: Harper and Row.Cheng, Chin-Chuan. 1973. A synchronic Phonology of Mandarin Chinese. The Hague: Mouton.Clements, G. N. 2001. Representational economy in constraint-based phonology. In Distinctive feature theory, ed. by T. Alan Hall, 71–146. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Connelly, Mark. 1994. Phonological Markedness and Second Language Error Interpretation. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. Coetzee, Andries W. 2006. Variation as accessing ‘non-optimal’ candidates. Phonology 23:337-385.Davidson, Lisa and Rolf Noyer. 1997. Loan phonology in Huave: Nativization and the ranking of faithfulness constraints. In The Proceedings of the 15th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, eds. by Brian Agbayani, and Sze-Wing Tang. Stanford, 65-79. CA: Center Study Language and Information.Dong, Xiaoli. 2012. What borrowing buys us: A study of Mandarin Loanword Phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University. Duanmu, San. 1990. A formal study of syllable, tone, stress and domain in Chinese languages. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Dunamu, San. 2000. The Phonology of Standard Chinese. NY: Oxford University Press.Dunamu, San. 2007. The Phonology of Standard Chinese. 2nd Edition. NY: Oxford University Press.Dupoux, Emmanuel, Kazuhiko Kakehi, Yuki Hirose, Christophe Pallier, and Jacques Mehler. 1999. Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25:1568–1578.Dupoux, Emmanuel, Sharon Peperkamp, and Núria Sebastián-Gallés. 2001. A robust method to study stress “deafness”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110:1606-1618.Escudero, Paola. 2005. Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.Espy-Wilson, Carol Y. 1992. Acoustic measures for linguistic features distinguishing the semivowels /w j r l/ in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 92:736-757. Fleischhacker, Heidi. 2005. Similarity in phonology: Evidence from reduplication and loan adaptation. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.傅懋勣 (Fu, Maoji)。1956。北京話的音位和拼音字母 (Phonemes and pinyin symbols in the Beijing speech)。中國語文 1956.3：3-12。Gebéto, Flavuen. 1999. Les emprunts linguistiques d’ origine européene en Fon. Kölin: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Gussenhoven, Carlos and Haike Jacobs. 1998. Understanding Phonology. London: Arnold.Hancin-Bhatt and Barbara Jean. 1994. Segment transfer: A consequence of a dynamic system. Second Language Research 10:241–269.Hayes, Bruce. 2009. Introductory Phonology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Herd, Jonathon. 2005. Loanword adaptation and the evaluation of similarity. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 24:65–116. Hsiao, Yuchao. 2011. Universal marking in accent formation: evidence from Taiwanese-Mandarin and Mandarin-Taiwanese. Lingua 121:1485-1517.Hsieh, Feng-fan and Michael Kenstowicz. 2008. Phonetic knowledge in tonal adaptation: Mandarin and English loanwords in Lhasa Tibetan. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17:279-297.Hsieh, Feng-fan, Michael Kenstowicz, and Xiaomin Mou. 2009. Mandarin adaptation of coda nasals in English loanwords. In Loan Phonology, eds. by Andrea Calabrese and W. Leo Wetzels, 131-154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Hume, Elizabeth. 2003. Language specific markedness: The case of place of articulation. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 9(2):295-310.Hyman, Larry. 1970. The role of borrowing in justification of phonological grammars. Studies in African Linguistics 1:1-48.Ingram, John C. L. and See-Gyoon Park. 1998. Language, context, and speaker effects in the identification and discrimination of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese and Korean listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103:1161-1174.Inkelas, Sharon. 1998. The theoretical status of morphologically conditioned phonology: a case study from dominance. In Yearbook of Morphology 1997, eds. by Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle. Amsterdam: Springer.Inkelas, Sharon and Cheryl Zoll. 2005. Reduplication: Doubling in Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Inkelas, Sharon and Cheryl Zoll. 2007. Is grammar independence real? A comparison between cophonological and indexed constraint approaches to morphologically conditioned phonology. Linguistics 45.1:133-171.Itô, Junko and Armin Mester. 1995. Japanese phonology. In The handbook of phonological theory, ed. by John A. Goldsmith. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.Jacobs, Haike and Carlos Gussenhoven. 2000. Loan phonology: Perception, salience, the lexicon and OT. In Optimality Theory: Phonology, syntax, and acquisition, eds. by Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw and Jeroen van de Weijer, 193-210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Jun, Jongho. 1995. Place assimilation as the result of conflicting perceptual and articulatory constraints. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference of Formal Linguistics 14, 221-237.Kang, Yoonjung. 2003. Perceptual similarity in loanword adaptation: English postvocalic word-final stops in Korean. Phonology 20:219-273.Kang, Yoonjung. 2011. Loanword phonology. In Companion to Phonology, eds. by van Oostendorp, Marc, Colin Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Keren Rice. Wiley-Blackwell.Kenstowicz, Michael and Hyang-Sook Sohn. 2001. Accentual adaptation in North Kyungsang Korean. In Ken Hale. A Life in Language ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 239-270. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Kenstowicz, Michael. 2003a. Salience and similarity in loanword adaptation: a case study from Fijian. Manuscript, MIT.Kenstowicz, Michael. 2003b. The role of perception in loanword phonology. A review of Les emprunts linguistiques d’origine europénne en Fon by Flavien Gbéto, Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag, 2000. Studies in African Linguistics 32:95-112. Kenstowicz, Michael 2005. The phonetics and phonology of loanword adaptation. In Proceedings of ECKL 1: Proceedings of 1st European Conference on Korean Linguistics, ed. by S.-J. Rhee, 17–32. Seoul: Hankook Publishing Co.Kim, Hyunsoon. 1998. A phonetic characterization of release and nonrelease: the case of Korean and English. Language Research 34:347-368. Kim, Hyunsoon. 2008. Loanword adaptation between Japanese and Korean: Evidence for L1 feature-driven perception. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17:331–346.Kim, Hyunsoon. 2009. Korean adaptation of English affricates and fricatives in a feature-driven model of loanword adaptation. In Loan Phonology, eds. by Andrea Calabrese and W. Leo Wetzels, 155-180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Kiparsky, Paul. 1993. Variable rules. Handouts distributed at the Rutgers Optimality Workshop (ROW1).Kiu, K.L. 1977. Tonal rules for English loanwords in Cantonese. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 7:17-22. Kubozono, Haruo. 2006. Where does loanword prosody come from? A case study of Japanese loanword accent. Lingua 116:1140-1170.Labrune, Laurence. 2002. The prosodic structure of simple abbreviated loanwords in Japanese: a constraint-based account. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 6.1:98-120.LaCharité, Darlene and Carole Paradis. 2005. Category preservation and proximity versus phonetic approximation in loanword adaptation. Linguistic Inquiry 36:223-258.Ladefoged, Peter. 2001. A course in phonetics. 4th ed. Fort Worth, Tex: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.Lombardi, Linda. 1991. Laryngeal features and laryngeal neutralization. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Lombardi, Linda. 1996. Positional faithfulness and the phonology of voice assimilation in Optimality Theory. MA Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.Lombardi, Linda. 1999. Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17:267-302.Lombardi, Linda. 2001. Why Place and Voice are different: constraint-specific alternations in Optimality Theory. In Segmental phonology in Optimality Theory: Constraints and Representations, ed. by Linda Lombardi, 13-45. Cambridge University Press.Lin, Yen-Hwei. 2007a. Loanword adaptation of English vowels in standard Mandarin. In NACCL-18: Proceedings of the 18th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, ed. by Janet Xing, 331-342. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.Lin, Yen-Hwei. 2007b. The Sounds of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Lin, Yen-Hwei. 2008a. Variable vowel adaptation in Standard Mandarin loanwords. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17:363-380. Lin, Yen-Hwei. 2008b. Patterned vowels variation in Standard Mandarin loanword adaptation: Evidence from a dictionary corpus. In NACCL-20: Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, eds. by Marjorie Chan and Hana Kang, 175-184. Columbus, Ohio: East Asian Studies Center, The Ohio State University.Liu Zhengtan, Gao Mingkai, Mai Yongqian and Shi Yowei. 1984. Dictionary of Loanwords and Hybrid Words in Chinese. Shanghai cishu chubanshe, Shanghai.Lu, Mingchang. 2006. An Optimality Theory Approach to English and Southern Min Loanwords in Mandarin. MA Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan.Lü, Mingchang. 2013. Modeling salience and prosody in loanword adaptation: cases of English [•] in Mandarin. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 39.2:1-32.Luke, Kang-kwong and Chaakming Lau. 2008. On loanword truncation in Cantonese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17:347–362.McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and Reduplicative Identity. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, eds. by Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey and Suzanne Urbanczyk, 249-384. Amherst: GLSA. McCarthy, John J. 2008. Doing Optimality Theory. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.Miao, Ruiqin. 2005. Loanword Adaptation in Mandarin Chinese: Perceptual, Phonological and Sociolinguistic Factors. Doctoral dissertation, Stony Brook University, New York.Nagy, Naomi and William Reynolds. 1994. Optimality theory and variable word-final deletion in Faetar. Paper presented at NWAV-23, Stanford University.Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1996. Sign-based morphology and phonology: with special attention to Optimality Theory. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1998. Cyclic and noncyclic effects in a declarative grammar. In Yearbook of Morphology 1997, eds. by Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle. Amsterdam: Springer. Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1999. Sign-based morphology: a declarative theory of phonology-morphology interleaving. In The Derivational Residue in Phonological Optimality Theory, eds. by Ben Hermans and Marc van Oostendorp. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Orgun, Cemil Orhan and Inkelas, Sharon. 2002. Reconsidering bracket erasure. In Yearbook of Morphology 2001, eds. by Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle. Amsterdam: Springer.Pallier, Christopher, Laura Bosch, Nuria Sebastián-Gallés. 1997. A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition 643:9-17.Paradis, Carole and Jean-François Prunet. 1991. Phonetics and phonology 2: The special status of coronals: internal and external evidence. New York: Academic PressParadis, Carole and Jean-François Prunet. 2000. Nasal vowels as two segments: evidence from borrowings. Language 76:324-357. Paradis, Carole. 1995. Derivational constraints in phonology: Evidence from loanwords and implications. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society, eds. by Audra Dainora, Rachel Hemphill, Barbara Luka, Barbara Need and Sheri Pargman, 360-374. Chicago: CLS.Padgett, Jaye. 1995c. Feature classes. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18. Amherst, MA: GLSA, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts.Paradis, Carole. 1996. The inadequacy of filters and faithfulness in loanword adaptation. In Current Trends in Phonology, eds. by Jacques Durand and Bernard Laks. Salford, 509-534. University of Salford Publications.Paradis, Carole and Darlene LaCharité. 1997. Preservation and minimality in loanword adaptation. Journal of Linguistics 33.1:379-430.Paradis, Carole and Antoine Tremblay. 2009. Nondistinctive features in loanword adaptation. In Loan Phonology, eds. by Andrea Calabrese and W. Leo Wetzels. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Peperkamp, Sharon. 2002a. Towards a new theory of loanword adaptations. MA thesis, University of Paris 8.Peperkamp, Sharon and Emmanuel Dupoux. 2002. Loanword adaptations: Three problems for phonology (and a psycholinguistic solution). Paper presented at the North American Phonology Conference (Naphs), Concordia University, Montreal.Peperkamp, Sharon and Emmanuel Dupoux. 2003. Reinterpreting loanword adaptations: the role of perception. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, eds. by M.J. Solé, D. Recasens and J. Romero, 367-370. Barcelona: Causal Productions.Peperkamp, Sharon. 2005. A psycholinguistic theory of loanword adaptations. BLS 30:341–352.Peperkamp, Sharon, Inga Vendelin, and Kimihiro Nakamura. 2008. On the perceptual origin of loanword adaptations: Experimental evidence from Japanese. Phonology 25:129–164.Pollard, Mark G. 2008. Epenthetic vowel quality in English loanwords in Inuktitut. MA thesis, University of Toronto.Polivanov, Evgenij Dmitrievič. 1931. La perception des sons d’une langue étrangère. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 4:79-96 [English translation: The subjective nature of the perceptions of language sounds. In Selected works: articles on general linguistics, ed. by Polivanov 1994. The Hague: Mouton. 223-237].Prince, Alan. 2002a. Arguing Optimality. ROA-562. Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. Repetti, Lori. 2009. Gemination in English loans in American varieties of Italian. In Loan Phonology, eds. by Andrea Calabrese and W. Leo Wetzels, 225-239.Rice, Keren. 2000. Featural markedness in phonology: variation. GLOT International 4.7, 4.8:3-6, 3-7.Schütz, Albert J. 1978. English loanwords in Fijian. In Fijian language studies: borrowing and pidginization, ed. by Albert J. Schütz, 4:1-50. Bulletin of the Fiji Museum.Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1982. The syllable. In The structure of phonological representations II, eds. by van der Hulst, Harry and Norval Smith, 337-383. Dordrecht: Foris.Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1994. The constraint question for feature structure: a review of some answers. Course materials for Linguistics 730, Fall 1994; University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Shih, Lijen. 2004. Consonantal and Syllabic Adaptations in English Loanwords in Mandarin. MA thesis, Michigan State University, Michigan.Shinohara, Shigeko. 1997. Analyse phonologique de l’adaptation japonaise de mots etrangers. Doctoral dissertation, Universite de Paris III. Shinohara, Shigeko. 2000. Default accentuation and foot structure in Japanese: Evidence from Japanese adaptations from French words. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9:5-96.Shinohara, Shigeko. 2004a. Emergence of universal grammar in foreign word adaptations. In Constraints in Phonological Acquisition, eds. by René Kager, Joe Pater, and Wim Zonneveld, 292-320. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Shinohara, Shigeko. 2004b. Perceptual effects in consonant deletion patterns in loanword phonology. Manuscript, CNRS.Silverman, Daniel. 1992. Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: Evidence from Cantonese. Phonology 9:289-328.Sloos, Marjoleine. 2012. Paper presented at the 2nd Shanghai Phonology and Phonetics Conference, Shanghai, China.Steriade, Donca. 1993. Positional neutralization. Paper presented at the 24th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Steriade, Donca. 2001. Directional asymmetries in place assimilation: A perceptual account. In The role of speech perception in phonology, eds. by Elizabeth Hume and Keith Johnson, 219–250. San Diego: Academic Press.Steriade, Donca. 2008. The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In The nature of the word: Studies in honor of Paul Kiparsky, eds. by Kristin Hanson and Sharon Inkelas, 151–180. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Uffmann, Christian. 2001. Patterns of epenthesis (not only) in Shona loanwords. In Proceedings of HILPS 5, eds. by Caroline Féry, Anthony Dubach Green and Ruben van de Vijver, 193-211. Potsdam: University of Potsdam. Uffmann, Christian. 2004. Vowel epenthesis in loanword phonology. Doctoral dissertation. Phillips-Universität Marburg. Ulrich, Charles H. 1997. Loanword adaptation in Lama: Testing the TCRS model. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 42:415-463.王力 (Wang, Li)。1979。現代漢語語音分析中的幾個問題 (Some problems in the phonetic analysis of modern Chinese)。中國語文 1979.4：281-286。吳瑾瑋 (Wu, Chin-wei)。2006。 現代漢語外來語聲調意義之研究 (The Role of Tone in Mandarin-Chinese Loanwords)。國立台灣師範大學國文學報第四十期：197-219。Wu, Hsiao-hung Iris. 2006. Stress to Tone: a study of tone loans in Mandarin Chinese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 52: 227-253.Yip, Moira. 1993. Cantonese loanword phonology and optimality theory. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1.1:261-291.Yip, Moira. 2002. Necessary but not sufficient: Perceptual loanword influences in loanword phonology. The Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan. Special issue on Aspects of loanword phonology 6.1:4-21.Yip, Moira. 2006. The symbiosis between perception and grammar in loanword phonology. Lingua 116:950-975.張嘉文，主編 (Zhang, Chia-wen, ed.)。2005。辭海 (Encyclopedic Dictionary of Chinese)。台北：鐘文出版社。Zuraw, Kie. 2010. A model of lexical variation and the grammar with application to Tagalog nasal substitution. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 28:417-472. zh_TW
