1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 社會科學學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 北投親子館社會資本積累之研究
The Study on Social Capital Accumulation of Beitou’s Parent-child Center
作者 畢瑋
Bi, Wei
貢獻者 顏良恭
畢瑋
Bi, Wei
關鍵詞 社會資本
社會網絡
互動
信任
規範
互動
北投親子館
日期 2017
上傳時間 28-八月-2017 11:45:39 (UTC+8)
摘要 北投親子館社會資本積累之研究
臺北市政府民國100年推出「祝你好孕方案」，積極推動「一區一親子館」政策，積極運用實體服務的提供。目前共設立13個親子館供民眾使用，臺北市將「一區一親子館之政策」透過委託方案的方式執行，讓各館接觸不同組織協助執行，提供更多變的服務內容。
本研究鎖定北投親子館，擁有眾多歷史、文化、自然環境，啟發北投親子館館長與當地多元資源的串聯和連結運用。台北市社會局向外委託承辦單位-臺北市教保人員協會接手經營北投親子館，有了方案委託所形成的垂直互動關係；親子館成立後，館長、志工人員與北投當地社區文化發展團體合作，有了向外拓展的水平互動關係，在此之中，更包含受委託機構與當地文化機構、組織、志工等水平互動、建立信任、合作、規範的實質內容，兩者皆因需求而連結共享資源。本研究採用質性研究方法，以訪談為主，輔以文獻分析法和參與觀察法，進而了解北投親子館如何與當地社會資源連結、建立社會情誼，如何形成多元參與的網絡治理動態發展過程，再造社會網絡與社會的「互動」、「信任」、「互惠」與「規範」的實質內涵，如亦同時具備了社會資本積累的發展情形。
綜合研究結果發現，本研究之結論如下:
北投親子館互動的動機有二，一則「尋求在地合作與聯絡當地情誼」，一則「與社會局契約之定期的年度(季)成果報告」，並且以「電話、見面、直接談話、聲音」幾種較傳統、有情感、有溫度的方式作為主要互動方式，有助於社會資本積累；連結的網絡中互動最為頻繁的是「社會局、溫泉博物館、月琴民謠協會、梅庭、凱達格蘭博物館、志工們」，其餘反之，網絡成員甚大；信任關係細分為兩種類型，一則為各個局處機關和直屬館方所形成的貫連式社會資本的積累-「政府制式化的招標程序，觀察與冰冷的信任關係」；一則為館方、館方與志工等的跨接式社會資本積累方式-「尋找共同特質、認同感、主動性、熱情、誠意、真心的笑容以及醞釀與累積信任感」；互惠關係之社會資本積累-「人際關係與心智的增長、認識新朋友、幫助自己的組織找到新的方向、建立在地情誼、創建合作平台、提升親子館之多元服務」；規範關係之社會資本積累-正式規範與非正式規範相較而言，「非正式規範給予無限制的互動頻率，以增加情感的溫度」，是積累社會資本的最大助力；以北投親子館為核心所發散的社會網絡，所積累的社會資本是由以上四個面向所聚集而成，然而北投親子館目前可以有今日多元盛況的發展，便是在四個面向中皆找到「最有溫度和情感的方式」在運行。

關鍵字:社會資本、社會網絡、互動、信任、互惠、規範、北投親子館
The Study on Social Capital Accumulation of Beitou’s Parent-child Center
Summary
At the year 2011, Taipei city government introduced a program named “Wish You a Good Pregnancy” and fully promoted a policy named “One Area One a Parent-child Center” for each district. The purpose was to actively serve parents and children by creating a community driven, safe, free, and high quality institution and space for raising children. Right now there are 13 parent-child centers that are open to public. In order to provide more customized and varied services, “One Area One a Parent-child Center” project work together with many other institutions and companies.

This study focus on Beitou’s Parent-child Center, a place with a rich history, culture and natural environment, which inspired the president of the parent-child center to utilize all these advantages and improve the parent-child center. Taipei civil department outsourced the management of Beitou’s Parent-child Center to “Taipei Teaching Staff Organization”. With this infrastructure, everyone in the parent-child center, including its president, volunteers and local cultural organizations work together in a trustworthy, cooperative, and disciplined environment and to share common resources to reach everyone’s goals. This study will use qualitative research method, which the main part of the study will be based on interviews, supported by recorded documents, observation on the site, and other related information. Using these methods, we further understand how Beitou’s Parent-child Center work with local social resources, create local community and accumulate social resources that are created by Interaction, Trust, Reciprocity and Standards.
Our study concludes:
There are two main incentives for Beitou’s Parent-child Center to cooperate with third party organization. The first is to find local partner and create good relationship. The second is a quarterly seasonal report promised to civil department. For communications, parent-child center have used several traditional methods including, phone call, direct meet up, direct conversation and voice messages. These traditional methods provide a more personal, and intimate feeling, which works well when it comes to accumulating social assets.
In the cooperation network, organizations that communicate most frequently are The Civil Department, Hot Spring Museum, YueQin Folk Music Association, Meiting, Kaidagelan Museum and volunteers.
The trust relationship can be grouped into two kinds, the first is the trust between associations and the government. Which is part of the government program, a direct and straightforward trust relationship. On the other hand, you have the trusting relationship between the parent-child center and its volunteers. They build up their relationship from working toward a same goal, passion, and taking initiatives .
The Win-win relationship of the accumulation of social resources is reached by building connections between people, discovering new friends, and helping people to find their future direction, creating a local community, creating a cooperation platform and increasing the variety of services provided.
The ruling relationship of the accumulation of social resources is created by informal rules about communication which result in a warmer relationship and more frequent communication between parties.
The social network that created and cored by Beitou’s Parent-child Center accumulate many social resources using many methods listed above., the growth of the institution can be seen by the core concept that they have chosen in all their method, which is the warmth of local society. This is the main reason behind the rapid growth of Beitou’s Parent-child Center.
參考文獻 參考文獻
中文部分
朱瑞玲(1989) 。親子關係: 子女的知覺與解釋及其影響。中央研究院三民主義研究所叢刊 ，25，181-246。
江鴻津(2012)。社會資本與樂齡學習之研究-以桃園縣為例。元智大學社會暨政策科學學系學位論文，未出版，桃園縣。
呂桂英(2003)。社區發展與文化重建-虎尾西安社區白鶴文化節與褒忠大部社區花鼓節的比較研究。國立中正大學政治學研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
周麗芳(2002)。華人組織中的關係與社會網絡。本土心理學研究，18，175-227。
林南（2007）。社會資本理論與研究簡介。社會科學論叢，1(1):1-32
邱兆台(2012)。社區組織社會資本的建構與累積-以台北市奇岩社區發展協會為　例。東海大學行政管理暨政策學系，未出版，台中市。
畢恆達（2010）。教授為什麼沒告訴我。新北市：小畢空間。
許芝綺等(2014)。政府處理少子化問題應有之策略與作法 ─提高生育率之探討。《T&D飛訊》，190，1-35。
陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。臺北﹕五南。
陳姿岑(2008)。高雄市社區型長青學苑學員學習需求與學習滿意度關係之研究。 國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
陳恆鈞(2002)。治理互賴與政策執行。臺北:商鼎文化。
陳榮德(2004)。組織內部社會網絡的行程與影響:社會資本觀點。中山大學人力資源管理研究，19，40-57。
英文部分


Baker, W. E., & Obstfeld, D. (1999). Social capital by design: Structures, strategies, and institutional context. In Corporate Social Capital and Lliability, 41,88-105. New York: Springer .
Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le capital social: Notes provisoires. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 3, 2-3.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In Richardson, J. G. (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education . New York: Greenwood Press.
Boxman, E. A. W., De Graaf, P. M., & Flap, H. D. (1991) The impact of social and human capital on the income attainment of Dutch Managers. Social Networks, 13, 51-73.
Brehm, J. & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999-1023.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198-213.
Burr, R. S. (1997). The contingent values of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365.
Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structural of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), 95-120.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Evans, P. ( 1996). Government Action, Social Capital and Development: Reviewing the Evidence on Synergy. World Development, 24, 1119-1132.
Field, J. (2003). Social Capital. London: Routledge.
Franke, S. (2005). Measurement of social capital: Reference document for public policy research, development and evaluation. Policy Research Initiative Social Capital as a Public Policy Tool, Government of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Social capital and the global economy. Foreign Affairs, 75(5), 89-103.
Gilchrist, A. (2009). The Well-Connected Community: A Networking Approach to Community Development. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
Habermas, J. (1974). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article. New German Critique, 3, 49-55.
Hanifan, L. J. (1916). The rural school community center. Annals of The American Academy Of Political And Social Science, 67, 130-138.
Hastings, A. (2003). Strategic, multilevel neighbourhood regeneration: An outward looking approach at last? In M. Raco, & R. Imrie (Eds.), Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy,85-100. Bristol: Policy Press.
Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S. B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58,277-303.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Post-Modernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Iyer, S., Kitson, M., & Toh, B. (2005). Social capital, economic growth and regional development. Regional Studies, 39(8), 1015-1040.
Jacobs, Jane (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage.
Johnston, G., & Percy-Smith, J. (2003). In search of social capital. Policy & Politics, 31(3), 321-334.
Juran, J. M. (1986). A universal approach to managing for quality. Quality Progress, 12, 19-24.
Kay, A. (2006). Social capital: the social economy and community development .Community Development Journal, 41(2), 160-173.
Knoke, D. (1999). Organizational networks and corporate social capital. In R. Th. A. J. Leenders & S. M. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate Social Capital and Liability, 38(8),17-42. Boston: Kluwer.
Kotler, P., Haider, D., & Rein, I. (1993). There`s no place like our place! The marketing of cities, regions, and nations. The Futurist, 27(6), 14.
Krackhardt, D., & Hanson, J. R. (1993). Informal networks. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 104-111.
Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
McNeely, J. (1999). Community building. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(6), 741-750.
Mel, E. & O. Jenny (2007). Social capital and sustainability in a community under threat. Local Environment, 12(1), 17-30.
Middleton, A., A. Murie & R. Groves (2005). Social capital and neighbourhoods that work. Urban Studies, 42(10), 1711-1738.
Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
Newman, L., & Dale, A. (2005). Network structure, diversity, and proactive resilience building: a response to Tompkins and Adger. Ecology and Society, 10(1), r2.
Newman, L., & Dale, A. (2005). The role of agency in sustainable local community development. Local Environment, 10(5), 477-486.
Newton, K. (1999). Social capital and European democracy in modern Europe. In Jan W. Can Deth, Marco Maraffi, Ken Newton and Paul F. Whiteley (eds). Social Capital and European Democracy, 3-24.London: Routledge.
OECD (2001).The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital. Paris: Centre for educational research and innovation, OECD.
Poder, T. G. (2011). What is really social capital? A critical review. The American Sociologist, 42(4), 341-367.
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and application in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 1-24.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 4(13), 35-42.
Rohe, W. M. (2004). Building social capital through community development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2), 158-164.
Wellman, B. (1998). Networks in the Global Village. Boulder, CO: Westview.
World Congress of Sociology (1998). The barometer of social capital (Barcas): Measuring social capital in Colombia. A work in progress, Montreal: World Congress of Sociology.
Zukin, S. (1924). The Cultures of Cities. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
公共行政學系
1032560062
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1032560062
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 顏良恭zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 畢瑋zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Bi, Weien_US
dc.creator (作者) 畢瑋zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Bi, Weien_US
dc.date (日期) 2017en_US
dc.date.accessioned 28-八月-2017 11:45:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 28-八月-2017 11:45:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 28-八月-2017 11:45:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G1032560062en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112218-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 公共行政學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 1032560062zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 北投親子館社會資本積累之研究
臺北市政府民國100年推出「祝你好孕方案」，積極推動「一區一親子館」政策，積極運用實體服務的提供。目前共設立13個親子館供民眾使用，臺北市將「一區一親子館之政策」透過委託方案的方式執行，讓各館接觸不同組織協助執行，提供更多變的服務內容。
本研究鎖定北投親子館，擁有眾多歷史、文化、自然環境，啟發北投親子館館長與當地多元資源的串聯和連結運用。台北市社會局向外委託承辦單位-臺北市教保人員協會接手經營北投親子館，有了方案委託所形成的垂直互動關係；親子館成立後，館長、志工人員與北投當地社區文化發展團體合作，有了向外拓展的水平互動關係，在此之中，更包含受委託機構與當地文化機構、組織、志工等水平互動、建立信任、合作、規範的實質內容，兩者皆因需求而連結共享資源。本研究採用質性研究方法，以訪談為主，輔以文獻分析法和參與觀察法，進而了解北投親子館如何與當地社會資源連結、建立社會情誼，如何形成多元參與的網絡治理動態發展過程，再造社會網絡與社會的「互動」、「信任」、「互惠」與「規範」的實質內涵，如亦同時具備了社會資本積累的發展情形。
綜合研究結果發現，本研究之結論如下:
北投親子館互動的動機有二，一則「尋求在地合作與聯絡當地情誼」，一則「與社會局契約之定期的年度(季)成果報告」，並且以「電話、見面、直接談話、聲音」幾種較傳統、有情感、有溫度的方式作為主要互動方式，有助於社會資本積累；連結的網絡中互動最為頻繁的是「社會局、溫泉博物館、月琴民謠協會、梅庭、凱達格蘭博物館、志工們」，其餘反之，網絡成員甚大；信任關係細分為兩種類型，一則為各個局處機關和直屬館方所形成的貫連式社會資本的積累-「政府制式化的招標程序，觀察與冰冷的信任關係」；一則為館方、館方與志工等的跨接式社會資本積累方式-「尋找共同特質、認同感、主動性、熱情、誠意、真心的笑容以及醞釀與累積信任感」；互惠關係之社會資本積累-「人際關係與心智的增長、認識新朋友、幫助自己的組織找到新的方向、建立在地情誼、創建合作平台、提升親子館之多元服務」；規範關係之社會資本積累-正式規範與非正式規範相較而言，「非正式規範給予無限制的互動頻率，以增加情感的溫度」，是積累社會資本的最大助力；以北投親子館為核心所發散的社會網絡，所積累的社會資本是由以上四個面向所聚集而成，然而北投親子館目前可以有今日多元盛況的發展，便是在四個面向中皆找到「最有溫度和情感的方式」在運行。

關鍵字:社會資本、社會網絡、互動、信任、互惠、規範、北投親子館		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The Study on Social Capital Accumulation of Beitou’s Parent-child Center
Summary
At the year 2011, Taipei city government introduced a program named “Wish You a Good Pregnancy” and fully promoted a policy named “One Area One a Parent-child Center” for each district. The purpose was to actively serve parents and children by creating a community driven, safe, free, and high quality institution and space for raising children. Right now there are 13 parent-child centers that are open to public. In order to provide more customized and varied services, “One Area One a Parent-child Center” project work together with many other institutions and companies.

This study focus on Beitou’s Parent-child Center, a place with a rich history, culture and natural environment, which inspired the president of the parent-child center to utilize all these advantages and improve the parent-child center. Taipei civil department outsourced the management of Beitou’s Parent-child Center to “Taipei Teaching Staff Organization”. With this infrastructure, everyone in the parent-child center, including its president, volunteers and local cultural organizations work together in a trustworthy, cooperative, and disciplined environment and to share common resources to reach everyone’s goals. This study will use qualitative research method, which the main part of the study will be based on interviews, supported by recorded documents, observation on the site, and other related information. Using these methods, we further understand how Beitou’s Parent-child Center work with local social resources, create local community and accumulate social resources that are created by Interaction, Trust, Reciprocity and Standards.
Our study concludes:
There are two main incentives for Beitou’s Parent-child Center to cooperate with third party organization. The first is to find local partner and create good relationship. The second is a quarterly seasonal report promised to civil department. For communications, parent-child center have used several traditional methods including, phone call, direct meet up, direct conversation and voice messages. These traditional methods provide a more personal, and intimate feeling, which works well when it comes to accumulating social assets.
In the cooperation network, organizations that communicate most frequently are The Civil Department, Hot Spring Museum, YueQin Folk Music Association, Meiting, Kaidagelan Museum and volunteers.
The trust relationship can be grouped into two kinds, the first is the trust between associations and the government. Which is part of the government program, a direct and straightforward trust relationship. On the other hand, you have the trusting relationship between the parent-child center and its volunteers. They build up their relationship from working toward a same goal, passion, and taking initiatives .
The Win-win relationship of the accumulation of social resources is reached by building connections between people, discovering new friends, and helping people to find their future direction, creating a local community, creating a cooperation platform and increasing the variety of services provided.
The ruling relationship of the accumulation of social resources is created by informal rules about communication which result in a warmer relationship and more frequent communication between parties.
The social network that created and cored by Beitou’s Parent-child Center accumulate many social resources using many methods listed above., the growth of the institution can be seen by the core concept that they have chosen in all their method, which is the warmth of local society. This is the main reason behind the rapid growth of Beitou’s Parent-child Center.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 5
第二章 文獻回顧 9
第一節 社會資本的定義 9
第二節 社會資本與社會網絡的關聯性 10
第三節 社會資本積累的實質要素 13
第四節 本文之研究架構 20
第三章 研究設計 25
第一節 研究方法 25
第二節 研究流程設計與實施 29
第四章 研究結果與分析 31
第一節 北投親子館與政府、政府所屬館所、其他組織和志工的互動 31
第二節 北投親子館如何與政府、政府所屬館所、其他組織和志工建立信任 46
第三節 北投親子館與政府、政府所屬館所、其他組織和志工的互惠關係 54
第四節 北投親子館與政府、政府所屬館所、其他組織和志工所建立的規範 60
第五章 結論 65
第一節 研究發現 65
第二節 研究省思與建議 66








圖目錄
圖1 研究架構圖 21
圖2 研究流程圖 29
圖3 臺北市一區一親子館組織圖 30
圖4 貫連式社會資本與跨接式社會資本互動之關係圖 43
圖5 北投親子館透過溫泉博物館、梅庭所拓展之網絡圖 44
圖6 北投親子館與其他組織、志工互動之網絡圖 44
圖7 北投親子館與政府、政府所屬館所、其他組織與志工互動關係圖 45
圖8 北投親子館與政府、政府所屬館所、其他組織與志工信任關係圖 54
圖9 北投親子館與政府、政府所屬館所、其他組織與志工互惠關係圖 60
圖10 北投親子館與政府、政府所屬館所、其他組織與志工規範關係圖 64

表目錄
表1 「社會資本之定義」與「社會網絡」相關文獻彙整 10
表2 學者研究社會資本之實質要素 14
表3 受訪者基本資料 27

附件
附件一 訪談大綱 74
附件二 實地觀察日誌1 77
附件三 實地觀察日誌2 80
附件四 實地觀察日誌3 82
附件五 實地觀察日誌4 84
附件六 實地觀察日誌5 85
附件七 實地觀察日誌6 86
附件八 實地觀察日誌7 87
附件九 實地觀察日誌8 88
附件十 實地觀察日誌9 89		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 2260088 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1032560062en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會資本zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會網絡zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 互動zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 信任zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 規範zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 互動zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 北投親子館zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 北投親子館社會資本積累之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Study on Social Capital Accumulation of Beitou’s Parent-child Centeren_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 參考文獻
中文部分
朱瑞玲(1989) 。親子關係: 子女的知覺與解釋及其影響。中央研究院三民主義研究所叢刊 ，25，181-246。
江鴻津(2012)。社會資本與樂齡學習之研究-以桃園縣為例。元智大學社會暨政策科學學系學位論文，未出版，桃園縣。
呂桂英(2003)。社區發展與文化重建-虎尾西安社區白鶴文化節與褒忠大部社區花鼓節的比較研究。國立中正大學政治學研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
周麗芳(2002)。華人組織中的關係與社會網絡。本土心理學研究，18，175-227。
林南（2007）。社會資本理論與研究簡介。社會科學論叢，1(1):1-32
邱兆台(2012)。社區組織社會資本的建構與累積-以台北市奇岩社區發展協會為　例。東海大學行政管理暨政策學系，未出版，台中市。
畢恆達（2010）。教授為什麼沒告訴我。新北市：小畢空間。
許芝綺等(2014)。政府處理少子化問題應有之策略與作法 ─提高生育率之探討。《T&D飛訊》，190，1-35。
陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。臺北﹕五南。
陳姿岑(2008)。高雄市社區型長青學苑學員學習需求與學習滿意度關係之研究。 國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
陳恆鈞(2002)。治理互賴與政策執行。臺北:商鼎文化。
陳榮德(2004)。組織內部社會網絡的行程與影響:社會資本觀點。中山大學人力資源管理研究，19，40-57。
英文部分


Baker, W. E., & Obstfeld, D. (1999). Social capital by design: Structures, strategies, and institutional context. In Corporate Social Capital and Lliability, 41,88-105. New York: Springer .
Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le capital social: Notes provisoires. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 3, 2-3.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In Richardson, J. G. (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education . New York: Greenwood Press.
Boxman, E. A. W., De Graaf, P. M., & Flap, H. D. (1991) The impact of social and human capital on the income attainment of Dutch Managers. Social Networks, 13, 51-73.
Brehm, J. & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999-1023.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198-213.
Burr, R. S. (1997). The contingent values of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365.
Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structural of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), 95-120.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Evans, P. ( 1996). Government Action, Social Capital and Development: Reviewing the Evidence on Synergy. World Development, 24, 1119-1132.
Field, J. (2003). Social Capital. London: Routledge.
Franke, S. (2005). Measurement of social capital: Reference document for public policy research, development and evaluation. Policy Research Initiative Social Capital as a Public Policy Tool, Government of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Social capital and the global economy. Foreign Affairs, 75(5), 89-103.
Gilchrist, A. (2009). The Well-Connected Community: A Networking Approach to Community Development. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
Habermas, J. (1974). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article. New German Critique, 3, 49-55.
Hanifan, L. J. (1916). The rural school community center. Annals of The American Academy Of Political And Social Science, 67, 130-138.
Hastings, A. (2003). Strategic, multilevel neighbourhood regeneration: An outward looking approach at last? In M. Raco, & R. Imrie (Eds.), Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy,85-100. Bristol: Policy Press.
Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S. B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58,277-303.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Post-Modernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Iyer, S., Kitson, M., & Toh, B. (2005). Social capital, economic growth and regional development. Regional Studies, 39(8), 1015-1040.
Jacobs, Jane (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage.
Johnston, G., & Percy-Smith, J. (2003). In search of social capital. Policy & Politics, 31(3), 321-334.
Juran, J. M. (1986). A universal approach to managing for quality. Quality Progress, 12, 19-24.
Kay, A. (2006). Social capital: the social economy and community development .Community Development Journal, 41(2), 160-173.
Knoke, D. (1999). Organizational networks and corporate social capital. In R. Th. A. J. Leenders & S. M. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate Social Capital and Liability, 38(8),17-42. Boston: Kluwer.
Kotler, P., Haider, D., & Rein, I. (1993). There`s no place like our place! The marketing of cities, regions, and nations. The Futurist, 27(6), 14.
Krackhardt, D., & Hanson, J. R. (1993). Informal networks. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 104-111.
Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
McNeely, J. (1999). Community building. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(6), 741-750.
Mel, E. & O. Jenny (2007). Social capital and sustainability in a community under threat. Local Environment, 12(1), 17-30.
Middleton, A., A. Murie & R. Groves (2005). Social capital and neighbourhoods that work. Urban Studies, 42(10), 1711-1738.
Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
Newman, L., & Dale, A. (2005). Network structure, diversity, and proactive resilience building: a response to Tompkins and Adger. Ecology and Society, 10(1), r2.
Newman, L., & Dale, A. (2005). The role of agency in sustainable local community development. Local Environment, 10(5), 477-486.
Newton, K. (1999). Social capital and European democracy in modern Europe. In Jan W. Can Deth, Marco Maraffi, Ken Newton and Paul F. Whiteley (eds). Social Capital and European Democracy, 3-24.London: Routledge.
OECD (2001).The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital. Paris: Centre for educational research and innovation, OECD.
Poder, T. G. (2011). What is really social capital? A critical review. The American Sociologist, 42(4), 341-367.
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and application in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 1-24.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 4(13), 35-42.
Rohe, W. M. (2004). Building social capital through community development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2), 158-164.
Wellman, B. (1998). Networks in the Global Village. Boulder, CO: Westview.
World Congress of Sociology (1998). The barometer of social capital (Barcas): Measuring social capital in Colombia. A work in progress, Montreal: World Congress of Sociology.
Zukin, S. (1924). The Cultures of Cities. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.		zh_TW