1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 社會科學學院
  4. 期刊論文
  5. Item

學術產出-期刊論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 Domestication of International Human Rights Norms in Taiwan: A Dialogue through Conventionality Review under Construction
作者 翁燕菁
Weng, Vivianne Yen-ching
Hsu, Yao-ming
貢獻者 政治系
日期 2017-10
上傳時間 12-七月-2018 17:29:41 (UTC+8)
摘要 Taiwan, without access to international treaties, has created its own way to implement universal human rights norms. A theoretically monist system with dualist practices, Taiwan’s treaty implementation acts inaugurate the era of conventionality review, along side its constitutionality review monopolized by the Grand Justices of Judicial Yuan. However, national judges still have doubts about the implementation methods and especially the superiority of these acts. We argue that firstly and practically, the human rights norms can only become effective when they prevail and thus invalidate rights-infringing acts. Secondly, observations from the national report examinations, executed by an ad hoc panel of international independent experts, are to be considered within concrete cases by national judges. National judges in Taiwan are not complete aliens to judicial review, and the conventionality review will only push the constitutionality review to grow stronger. From the experiences of France and Romania, we suggest that the domestication of international norms does not mean any top-down normative imposition, but a paranormal way to engage Taiwan seriously in a bargain between judges.
關聯 Asian Yearbook of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, Vol.1, pp.166-191
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004339033_008
dc.contributor 政治系
dc.creator (作者) 翁燕菁zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Weng, Vivianne Yen-chingen_US
dc.creator (作者) Hsu, Yao-mingen_US
dc.date (日期) 2017-10
dc.date.accessioned 12-七月-2018 17:29:41 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 12-七月-2018 17:29:41 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 12-七月-2018 17:29:41 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118634-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Taiwan, without access to international treaties, has created its own way to implement universal human rights norms. A theoretically monist system with dualist practices, Taiwan’s treaty implementation acts inaugurate the era of conventionality review, along side its constitutionality review monopolized by the Grand Justices of Judicial Yuan. However, national judges still have doubts about the implementation methods and especially the superiority of these acts. We argue that firstly and practically, the human rights norms can only become effective when they prevail and thus invalidate rights-infringing acts. Secondly, observations from the national report examinations, executed by an ad hoc panel of international independent experts, are to be considered within concrete cases by national judges. National judges in Taiwan are not complete aliens to judicial review, and the conventionality review will only push the constitutionality review to grow stronger. From the experiences of France and Romania, we suggest that the domestication of international norms does not mean any top-down normative imposition, but a paranormal way to engage Taiwan seriously in a bargain between judges.en_US
dc.format.extent 136 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) Asian Yearbook of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, Vol.1, pp.166-191
dc.title (題名) Domestication of International Human Rights Norms in Taiwan: A Dialogue through Conventionality Review under Constructionen_US
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1163/9789004339033_008
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004339033_008