學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 台北市公共自行車使用之空間分析與完整街道改善策略應用
Spatial Analysis of Public Bicycle Usage and the Application of Complete Street Improvement Strategy in Taipei City作者 文廷琳
Wen, Ting-Lin貢獻者 白仁德
文廷琳
Wen, Ting-Lin關鍵詞 共享機動性
公共自行車系統
空間分析
完整街道
Shared mobility
Public bike system
Spatial analysis
Complete street日期 2018 上傳時間 20-七月-2018 18:12:56 (UTC+8) 摘要 近年來，由於全球市場受到金融海嘯、歐債危機的衝擊，共享經濟 (sharing economy)的概念以新創的模式在世界各地崛起，而其中共享機動性(shared mobility)包含：汽車分享(car sharing)、汽車共乘(ride sharing)、自行車共享(bike sharing)等系統，具備提供了多樣化的交通選擇、延伸大眾運輸服務範圍，提升都市整體機動性等特性，被視為解決交通、環境問題的有效方式，因此在全球各大城市廣泛發展。然而過去我國之交通環境規劃皆是以機動車為規劃的對象與主體，在共享機動性運具使用者不斷增加的情形下，缺乏對於新型態運具使用者之保障。為考量此種新型態運具的使用，並提供不同運具使用者安全且平等的道路使用權利，本研究以台北市公共自行車YouBike系統為研究對象，藉由系統租借大數據資料的分析，了解不同時段、區位條件下各租借站點的使用情形，探討此種共享機動性在都市中不同時間的分布情形，以及其與都市土地使用之關聯，並研提街道改善策略。研究結果顯示：台北市公共自行車使用之空間分布情形，無論於平日、假日中的各時段皆相似，主要集中於信義區、大安區與中正區等地區，另外，捷運場站周邊之租借站亦有較高使用量的分布；進一步以熱點分析判別台北市公共自行車使用於空間中之群聚行為，發現台北市公共自行車的使用熱區位在信義區、大安區與中正區等行政區，而使用冷區則位於文山區和內湖區。接著，針對公共自行車租借站使用型態進行群落分析，將使用型態分為四類，並與土地使用、運輸場站等進行疊圖分析後，瞭解公共自行車使用與都市土地使用之關聯性。最後，則依據各項實證分析結果，選定臺灣大學周邊以及信義商圈一帶為公共自行車熱門騎乘區域，透過路徑分析針對兩區域內之租借站點間騎乘路徑進行推估，經由現地勘查並歸納後，發現這些地區普遍人行空間狹小，對於行人、自行車騎士等非機動運具使用者並不友善，難以提供各種用路族群安全且平等的出行權利，因此應用完整街道(complete street)規劃理念，進而提出街道改善策略，以供未來機動性規劃與街道設計之參考。
Due to the Financial crisis and European debt crisis in recent years, the concept of sharing economy has risen around the world. Among them, shared mobility includes: car sharing, ride sharing and bike sharing, has been widely developed in major cities around the world, since it provides diverse transportation options, extends the public transportation services,and enhances the mobility of the city. It was considered as the solution of traffic and environmental problems. However, the traffic environment planning in Taiwan was based on motor vehicle, when the users of shared mobility increased, in order to consider the use of this new type of vehicle and provide safe and equal Right-of-Way for users of different carriers, it was required to get insights into the service condition of shared mobility. This study analyzed the rental data of YouBike system in Taipei from 2013-May,2017, to understand the use of each station under different periods and location, explore the distribution of such shared mobility in city and the association with urban land use, and to propose the street improvement strategies.The results show that the spatial distribution of public bicycle use in Taipei City is similar in the weekdays and weekends, mainly in Xinyi District, Daan District, and Zhongzheng District. In addition, the hotspot analysis was used to determine the clustering behavior, and found that the hot zone for the use of public bicycles is in Xinyi District, Daan District and Zhongzheng District; the cold zone is located in Wenshan District and Neihu District. Then, we classified four rental types of public bicycle stations and overlayed the results with land use and transportation nodes to understand the relevance of public bicycle use and urban land use. According to the results of empirical analysis, the area surround Taiwan University and the Xinyi Commercial Area were selected as popular cycling areas for public bikes. After site inventoried, it was found that the pedestrian space is not enough and not friendly for pedestrians and bicycle riders, and hard to provide safe and equal rights for various road users. Therefore, this study applies the concept of complete streets planning, then proposes street improvement strategies for future reference in mobility planning and street design參考文獻 王少谷，2015，「公共自行車租用與都市土地型態關聯性之探討」，國立成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文：台南。白詩滎，2013，「臺北公共自行車使用行為特性分析與友善環境建構之研究」，國立政治大學碩士學位論文：台北。交通部運輸研究所，2012，「交通政策白皮書」余書玫，2009，「公共自行車租借系統選擇行為之研究」，國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士學位論文：新竹。邱辰，2015，「從空間角度分析公共自行車系統對站點周邊土地活動影響」，國立臺灣大學碩士學位論文：台北。邱昰芳，2014，交通共享新興服務模式之崛起，『台灣經濟研究月刊』38(8)：27-33。邵勇、王學勇、李娟、馬元直、劉志明.，2015，「完整街道理念下的城市道路橫斷面規劃」，『城市交通』，13(1)：25-33.胡文棟，2017，交通住宿共享經濟之法治因應探討，『國會季刊』45(1)：70-98。張辰尉，2017，「臺北市公共自行車站點需求分析之研究」，國立政治大學碩士學位論文：台北。葉朕、李瑞敏，2015，「完整街道政策發展綜述」，『城市交通』，13 (1)：17-24。解鴻年、張馨文，2011，「新竹科學城民眾使用公共自行車意願分析」，『建築與規劃學報』，12(3)：237-263。臺北市交通管制工程處，2012，臺北市市區自行車道路網發展計畫，台北市交通局。鄭雨桐，2016，「建成環境對公共自行車使用之影響」，國立臺灣大學地理環境資源學系研究所碩士學位論文：台北。顧永濤、朱楓、高捷，2013，「美國完整街道的思想內涵及其啟示」。論文發表於〈中國城市規劃年會〉，中國城市規劃學會：青島，民國102年11月16至18日Alta planning+design, 2012, Cincinnati bike share feasibility study.Bendon, T.,2009,Public Bike Use Share Feasibility Study:Volume Two:Demand AnalysisBike-Shared Studio., 2010, “Seattle bicycle share feasibility study, department of urban &planning college of built environment”, University of washintonBill Frith, 2012, “Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Safe Speeds: Literature Review”, Report 505, New Zealand Transportation AgencyBonnette, B., 2007, The Implementation of a Public-Use Bicycle Program in Philadelphia, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Urban Studies Program,University of Pennsylvania,. Pennsylvania.Bordagaray, M., Ibeas, A and dell’Olio, L., 2012, “Modeling user perception of public bicycle services” ,Social and Behavioral sciences,54: 1308-1316.Borgnat, P., Abry, P., Flandrin, P., Robardet, C., Rouquier, J. B., and Fleury, E., 2011, “Shared bicycles in a city: A signal processing and data analysis perspective”Advances in Complex Systems, 14(03): 415-438.Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, S., & Charlton, M., 1998. Geographically weighted regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 47(3), 431-443.Buck, D., and Buehler, R., 2012, “Bike lanes and other determinants of capital bikeshare trips”, Paper presented at Transportation research board annual meetingBurden, D., and Litman, T., 2011, “America Needs Complete Streets”, ITE Journal, 81(4): 36-43.Carol H. Tan, 2011, “Going On A Road Diet: Lane Reduction Can Increase Safety For Pedestrians, Bicyclists, And Motorists While Improving The Quality Of Life In Downtowns Across The Country,” Public Roads, U.S. Federal Highway AdministrationCervero, R. and Kockelman, K., 1997, “Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design”, Transportation Research: 2(3), 199-219.Chapin, F. E., and Kaiser, 1979, Urban land use planning, Chicago：University of Illinois press.Curran, A., 2008, TransLink Public Bike System Feasibility Study, Quay Communications Inc., Vancouver.DeMaio, P., 2009, “Bike-sharing: History, impacts, models of provision, and future”, Journal of Public Transportation, 12(4): 41-56.Dumbaugh E., 2005, “Safe Streets, Livable Streets,” Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(3): 283-300.Faghih-I mani, A., Eluru, N., El-Geneidy, A., Rabbat, M. and Haq, U., 2014, “How land-use and urban form impact bicycle flows: evidence from the bicycle-sharing system (BIXI) in Montreal”, Journal of Transport Geography, 41:306-314.Gauthier, A., Hughes, C., Kost, C., Li, S., et al., 2013. “The Bike-share Planning Guide”, ITDP Report.Hampshire, R &Marla, L., 2012, “An analysis of bike sharing usage: explaining trip generation and attraction from observed demand” Paper presented at TRB Annual Meeting.HSIS, 2010, Evaluation of Lane Reduction “Road Diet” Measures on Crashes Summary Report Research, Development, and Technology, Highway Safety Information SystemHughes, C., 2014. “Planning Bike Share for Better Performance” Transforming Transportation.Kaltenbrunner, A., Meza, R., Grivolla, J., Codina, J., and Banchs, R., 2010, “Urban cycles and mobility patterns: Exploring and predicting trends in a bicycle-based public transport system”Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 6(4): 455-466.Karndacharuk, A., Wilson, D. J and Dunn, R., 1989, “A review of the evolution of shared (street) space concepts in urban environments”, Transport reviews, 34(2), 190-220.Litman, T., 2012, “Evaluating Complete Streets: The Value of Designing Roads For Diverse Modes, Users and Activities” Victoria Transport Policy Institute.Litman, T., 2013, “The New Transportation Planning Paradigm”, ITE Journal, 83(6): 20-28.Martens K., 2004, “The bicycle as a feedering mode: experiences from three European countries”, Transport Research Part D, 9:281-294.Martin, E., Shaheen, S., and Lidicker, J., 2010, “Impact of carsharing on household vehicle holdings: Results from North American shared-use vehicle survey”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143:150-158.McCann, B., 2008, “Complete streets: We can get there from here”. ITE Journal, 78(5)Midgley, P., 2009, “The role of smart Bike-sharing systems in urban mobility”, Journeys, 2:23-31.Midgley, P., 2011, “Bicycle-sharing schemes: enhancing sustainable mobility in urban areas”, Paper presented at Commission on Sustainable Development Nineteenth Session.Murphy, E., and USHER, J., 2015, “The role of bicycle-sharing in the city: analysis of the Irish experience”, International journal of sustainable transportation, 9: 116-125.Owyang, J., Tran, C., & Silva, C. (2013). The collaborative economy.Altimeter, United States.Rixey, R., 2012, “Station-level forecasting of bike sharing ridership: station network effects in three U.S. systems”, Paper presented at TRB 2013 Annual meeting.Shaheen, Nelson Chan, Apaar Bansal, Adam Cohen, 2015, Shared Mobility Definitions, Industry Developments,and Early UnderstandingShaheen, S., & Chan, N., 2015, Mobility and the sharing economy: Impacts Synopsis.Transportation Sustainability Research Center, University of California, Berkeley. http://tsrc. berkeley. edu/sites/default/files/Innovative-Mobility-Industry-Outlook_SM-Spring-2015. pdf.Shaheen, S., &Guzman, S., 2011, Worldwide Bikesharing, ACCESS, 39:22-27.Shaheen, S., Guzman, S., & Zhang, H., 2010, “Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia Past, Present, and Future”, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143:159-167.Shaheen, S., Zhang, H., Martin, E. &Guzman, S., 2011, “Hangzhou Public Bicycle: Understanding Early Adoption and Behavioral Response to Bikesharing in Hangzhou, China” Transportation Research Record, 2247:34-41.Shaheen, S.A., Martin, E.W., Cohen, A.P., Finson,R.S.,2012, “Public Bike-sharing in North America: Early Operator and User Understanding”Shared-Use Mobility Center, 2015, Shared-Use Mobility Reference GuideTran,T.D, Ovtracht, N , Faivre d’Arcier, B ,2015, “Modeling bike sharing system using built environment factors” Prosedia CIRP, 30,293-298.Vicky Feng Wei and Gord Lovegrove, 2010, “Sustainable Road Safety: A New Neighbourhood Road Pattern That Saves VRU (Vulnerable Road Users) Lives”, Accident Analysis & PreventionVogel, P., Greiser, T., & Mattfeld, D. C., 2011, “Understanding bike-sharing systems using data mining: Exploring activity patterns”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20:514-523Wesley E. Marshall and Norman W. Garrick (2011), “Evidence on Why Bike-Friendly Cities Are Safer for All Road Users,” Environmental Practice, 13(1)Zhao, J., Deng W., Song Y., 2014, “Ridership and effectiveness of bikesharing: The effects of urban features and system characteristics on daily use and turnover rate of public bikes in China”, Transport Policy, 35:253-264臺北市微笑單車系統官方網站，2016，營運成果「臺北市租賃次」，(2017/10/06)下載。http://taipei.youbike.com.tw/cht/f212.php?nid=5b0857440e1a6649ffc29cd93eba9b35&rows=20&page=1AARP, 2009, “Planning Complete Streets for an Aging America”, American Association for Retired Persons Public Policy Institute .Retrived Oct 8 on World Wide Web:www.aarp.org/ppiOwyang, J., 2013,. “The Collaborative Economy”. ALTIMETER, Retrived Oct 10 on World Wide Web:http://www. slideshare. net/Altimeter/the-collaborative-economyShared Use Mobility Center, 2017, “What is Shared-Use Mobility?”, Retrived Oct 10 on World Wide Web:http://sharedusemobilitycenter.org/what-is-shared-mobility/Stefanie Seskin and Lily Gordon-Koven, 2013, “Best Complete Streets Policies of 2012”, .Retrived Oct 8 on World Wide Web:www.completestreets.org、www.smartgrowthamerica.orgNew York City Department of Transportation, 2009, “Street Design Manual” Retrived Oct 8 on World Wide Web:http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/sdm_lores.pdfSan Francisco Planning Department, 2011, “San Francisco Better Streets Planning” Retrived Oct 8 on World Wide Web:http://www.sfplanning.org/ftp/BetterStreets/proposals.htm#Final_Plan.Transport for London, 2009, “Streetscape Guidance :ExecutiveSummary-A Guide to Better London Streets” Retrived Oct 8 on World Wide Web:http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/publications-and-reports/streetsNew York Departmentof Transportation, 2015, “Measuring the Street :New Metrics for 21st Century Streets” Retrived Oct 8 on World Wide Web:http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/2012-10-measuring-the-street.pdf. Smart Growth America , 2012, “Recent Lessons from the Stimulus:Transportation Funding and Job Creation” Retrived Oct 8 on World Wide Web:http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/documents/lessons-from-the-stimulus.pdf 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系
105257011資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105257011 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 白仁德 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) 文廷琳 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Wen, Ting-Lin en_US dc.creator (作者) 文廷琳 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Wen, Ting-Lin en_US dc.date (日期) 2018 en_US dc.date.accessioned 20-七月-2018 18:12:56 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 20-七月-2018 18:12:56 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 20-七月-2018 18:12:56 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0105257011 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118787 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 地政學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 105257011 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 近年來，由於全球市場受到金融海嘯、歐債危機的衝擊，共享經濟 (sharing economy)的概念以新創的模式在世界各地崛起，而其中共享機動性(shared mobility)包含：汽車分享(car sharing)、汽車共乘(ride sharing)、自行車共享(bike sharing)等系統，具備提供了多樣化的交通選擇、延伸大眾運輸服務範圍，提升都市整體機動性等特性，被視為解決交通、環境問題的有效方式，因此在全球各大城市廣泛發展。然而過去我國之交通環境規劃皆是以機動車為規劃的對象與主體，在共享機動性運具使用者不斷增加的情形下，缺乏對於新型態運具使用者之保障。為考量此種新型態運具的使用，並提供不同運具使用者安全且平等的道路使用權利，本研究以台北市公共自行車YouBike系統為研究對象，藉由系統租借大數據資料的分析，了解不同時段、區位條件下各租借站點的使用情形，探討此種共享機動性在都市中不同時間的分布情形，以及其與都市土地使用之關聯，並研提街道改善策略。研究結果顯示：台北市公共自行車使用之空間分布情形，無論於平日、假日中的各時段皆相似，主要集中於信義區、大安區與中正區等地區，另外，捷運場站周邊之租借站亦有較高使用量的分布；進一步以熱點分析判別台北市公共自行車使用於空間中之群聚行為，發現台北市公共自行車的使用熱區位在信義區、大安區與中正區等行政區，而使用冷區則位於文山區和內湖區。接著，針對公共自行車租借站使用型態進行群落分析，將使用型態分為四類，並與土地使用、運輸場站等進行疊圖分析後，瞭解公共自行車使用與都市土地使用之關聯性。最後，則依據各項實證分析結果，選定臺灣大學周邊以及信義商圈一帶為公共自行車熱門騎乘區域，透過路徑分析針對兩區域內之租借站點間騎乘路徑進行推估，經由現地勘查並歸納後，發現這些地區普遍人行空間狹小，對於行人、自行車騎士等非機動運具使用者並不友善，難以提供各種用路族群安全且平等的出行權利，因此應用完整街道(complete street)規劃理念，進而提出街道改善策略，以供未來機動性規劃與街道設計之參考。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Due to the Financial crisis and European debt crisis in recent years, the concept of sharing economy has risen around the world. Among them, shared mobility includes: car sharing, ride sharing and bike sharing, has been widely developed in major cities around the world, since it provides diverse transportation options, extends the public transportation services,and enhances the mobility of the city. It was considered as the solution of traffic and environmental problems. However, the traffic environment planning in Taiwan was based on motor vehicle, when the users of shared mobility increased, in order to consider the use of this new type of vehicle and provide safe and equal Right-of-Way for users of different carriers, it was required to get insights into the service condition of shared mobility. This study analyzed the rental data of YouBike system in Taipei from 2013-May,2017, to understand the use of each station under different periods and location, explore the distribution of such shared mobility in city and the association with urban land use, and to propose the street improvement strategies.The results show that the spatial distribution of public bicycle use in Taipei City is similar in the weekdays and weekends, mainly in Xinyi District, Daan District, and Zhongzheng District. In addition, the hotspot analysis was used to determine the clustering behavior, and found that the hot zone for the use of public bicycles is in Xinyi District, Daan District and Zhongzheng District; the cold zone is located in Wenshan District and Neihu District. Then, we classified four rental types of public bicycle stations and overlayed the results with land use and transportation nodes to understand the relevance of public bicycle use and urban land use. According to the results of empirical analysis, the area surround Taiwan University and the Xinyi Commercial Area were selected as popular cycling areas for public bikes. After site inventoried, it was found that the pedestrian space is not enough and not friendly for pedestrians and bicycle riders, and hard to provide safe and equal rights for various road users. Therefore, this study applies the concept of complete streets planning, then proposes street improvement strategies for future reference in mobility planning and street design en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1-1第一節 研究動機與目的 1-1第二節 研究範疇 1-3第三節 研究方法 1-4第四節 研究內容與流程 1-5第二章 文獻回顧 2-1第一節 共享機動性與公共自行車系統 2-1第二節 公共自行車使用相關研究 2-13第三節 完整街道規劃理念 2-23第三章 研究設計 3-1第一節 研究架構 3-1第二節 資料整理 3-2第三節 作業步驟 3-4第四章 實證分析 4-1第一節 公共自行車使用統計分析 4-1第二節 公共自行車使用空間分析 4-6第三節 公共自行車租借型態與都市土地使用關聯分析 4-37第四節 公共自行車使用路徑推估與街道改善策略 4-52第五章 結論與建議 5-1第一節 結論 5-1第二節 後續研究建議 5-3參考文獻 參-1附錄 附-1 zh_TW dc.format.extent 8038389 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105257011 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 共享機動性 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公共自行車系統 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 空間分析 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 完整街道 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Shared mobility en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Public bike system en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Spatial analysis en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Complete street en_US dc.title (題名) 台北市公共自行車使用之空間分析與完整街道改善策略應用 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Spatial Analysis of Public Bicycle Usage and the Application of Complete Street Improvement Strategy in Taipei City en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王少谷，2015，「公共自行車租用與都市土地型態關聯性之探討」，國立成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文：台南。白詩滎，2013，「臺北公共自行車使用行為特性分析與友善環境建構之研究」，國立政治大學碩士學位論文：台北。交通部運輸研究所，2012，「交通政策白皮書」余書玫，2009，「公共自行車租借系統選擇行為之研究」，國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士學位論文：新竹。邱辰，2015，「從空間角度分析公共自行車系統對站點周邊土地活動影響」，國立臺灣大學碩士學位論文：台北。邱昰芳，2014，交通共享新興服務模式之崛起，『台灣經濟研究月刊』38(8)：27-33。邵勇、王學勇、李娟、馬元直、劉志明.，2015，「完整街道理念下的城市道路橫斷面規劃」，『城市交通』，13(1)：25-33.胡文棟，2017，交通住宿共享經濟之法治因應探討，『國會季刊』45(1)：70-98。張辰尉，2017，「臺北市公共自行車站點需求分析之研究」，國立政治大學碩士學位論文：台北。葉朕、李瑞敏，2015，「完整街道政策發展綜述」，『城市交通』，13 (1)：17-24。解鴻年、張馨文，2011，「新竹科學城民眾使用公共自行車意願分析」，『建築與規劃學報』，12(3)：237-263。臺北市交通管制工程處，2012，臺北市市區自行車道路網發展計畫，台北市交通局。鄭雨桐，2016，「建成環境對公共自行車使用之影響」，國立臺灣大學地理環境資源學系研究所碩士學位論文：台北。顧永濤、朱楓、高捷，2013，「美國完整街道的思想內涵及其啟示」。論文發表於〈中國城市規劃年會〉，中國城市規劃學會：青島，民國102年11月16至18日Alta planning+design, 2012, Cincinnati bike share feasibility study.Bendon, T.,2009,Public Bike Use Share Feasibility Study:Volume Two:Demand AnalysisBike-Shared Studio., 2010, “Seattle bicycle share feasibility study, department of urban &planning college of built environment”, University of washintonBill Frith, 2012, “Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Safe Speeds: Literature Review”, Report 505, New Zealand Transportation AgencyBonnette, B., 2007, The Implementation of a Public-Use Bicycle Program in Philadelphia, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Urban Studies Program,University of Pennsylvania,. Pennsylvania.Bordagaray, M., Ibeas, A and dell’Olio, L., 2012, “Modeling user perception of public bicycle services” ,Social and Behavioral sciences,54: 1308-1316.Borgnat, P., Abry, P., Flandrin, P., Robardet, C., Rouquier, J. B., and Fleury, E., 2011, “Shared bicycles in a city: A signal processing and data analysis perspective”Advances in Complex Systems, 14(03): 415-438.Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, S., & Charlton, M., 1998. Geographically weighted regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 47(3), 431-443.Buck, D., and Buehler, R., 2012, “Bike lanes and other determinants of capital bikeshare trips”, Paper presented at Transportation research board annual meetingBurden, D., and Litman, T., 2011, “America Needs Complete Streets”, ITE Journal, 81(4): 36-43.Carol H. Tan, 2011, “Going On A Road Diet: Lane Reduction Can Increase Safety For Pedestrians, Bicyclists, And Motorists While Improving The Quality Of Life In Downtowns Across The Country,” Public Roads, U.S. Federal Highway AdministrationCervero, R. and Kockelman, K., 1997, “Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design”, Transportation Research: 2(3), 199-219.Chapin, F. E., and Kaiser, 1979, Urban land use planning, Chicago：University of Illinois press.Curran, A., 2008, TransLink Public Bike System Feasibility Study, Quay Communications Inc., Vancouver.DeMaio, P., 2009, “Bike-sharing: History, impacts, models of provision, and future”, Journal of Public Transportation, 12(4): 41-56.Dumbaugh E., 2005, “Safe Streets, Livable Streets,” Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(3): 283-300.Faghih-I mani, A., Eluru, N., El-Geneidy, A., Rabbat, M. and Haq, U., 2014, “How land-use and urban form impact bicycle flows: evidence from the bicycle-sharing system (BIXI) in Montreal”, Journal of Transport Geography, 41:306-314.Gauthier, A., Hughes, C., Kost, C., Li, S., et al., 2013. “The Bike-share Planning Guide”, ITDP Report.Hampshire, R &Marla, L., 2012, “An analysis of bike sharing usage: explaining trip generation and attraction from observed demand” Paper presented at TRB Annual Meeting.HSIS, 2010, Evaluation of Lane Reduction “Road Diet” Measures on Crashes Summary Report Research, Development, and Technology, Highway Safety Information SystemHughes, C., 2014. “Planning Bike Share for Better Performance” Transforming Transportation.Kaltenbrunner, A., Meza, R., Grivolla, J., Codina, J., and Banchs, R., 2010, “Urban cycles and mobility patterns: Exploring and predicting trends in a bicycle-based public transport system”Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 6(4): 455-466.Karndacharuk, A., Wilson, D. J and Dunn, R., 1989, “A review of the evolution of shared (street) space concepts in urban environments”, Transport reviews, 34(2), 190-220.Litman, T., 2012, “Evaluating Complete Streets: The Value of Designing Roads For Diverse Modes, Users and Activities” Victoria Transport Policy Institute.Litman, T., 2013, “The New Transportation Planning Paradigm”, ITE Journal, 83(6): 20-28.Martens K., 2004, “The bicycle as a feedering mode: experiences from three European countries”, Transport Research Part D, 9:281-294.Martin, E., Shaheen, S., and Lidicker, J., 2010, “Impact of carsharing on household vehicle holdings: Results from North American shared-use vehicle survey”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143:150-158.McCann, B., 2008, “Complete streets: We can get there from here”. ITE Journal, 78(5)Midgley, P., 2009, “The role of smart Bike-sharing systems in urban mobility”, Journeys, 2:23-31.Midgley, P., 2011, “Bicycle-sharing schemes: enhancing sustainable mobility in urban areas”, Paper presented at Commission on Sustainable Development Nineteenth Session.Murphy, E., and USHER, J., 2015, “The role of bicycle-sharing in the city: analysis of the Irish experience”, International journal of sustainable transportation, 9: 116-125.Owyang, J., Tran, C., & Silva, C. (2013). The collaborative economy.Altimeter, United States.Rixey, R., 2012, “Station-level forecasting of bike sharing ridership: station network effects in three U.S. systems”, Paper presented at TRB 2013 Annual meeting.Shaheen, Nelson Chan, Apaar Bansal, Adam Cohen, 2015, Shared Mobility Definitions, Industry Developments,and Early UnderstandingShaheen, S., & Chan, N., 2015, Mobility and the sharing economy: Impacts Synopsis.Transportation Sustainability Research Center, University of California, Berkeley. http://tsrc. berkeley. edu/sites/default/files/Innovative-Mobility-Industry-Outlook_SM-Spring-2015. pdf.Shaheen, S., &Guzman, S., 2011, Worldwide Bikesharing, ACCESS, 39:22-27.Shaheen, S., Guzman, S., & Zhang, H., 2010, “Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia Past, Present, and Future”, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143:159-167.Shaheen, S., Zhang, H., Martin, E. &Guzman, S., 2011, “Hangzhou Public Bicycle: Understanding Early Adoption and Behavioral Response to Bikesharing in Hangzhou, China” Transportation Research Record, 2247:34-41.Shaheen, S.A., Martin, E.W., Cohen, A.P., Finson,R.S.,2012, “Public Bike-sharing in North America: Early Operator and User Understanding”Shared-Use Mobility Center, 2015, Shared-Use Mobility Reference GuideTran,T.D, Ovtracht, N , Faivre d’Arcier, B ,2015, “Modeling bike sharing system using built environment factors” Prosedia CIRP, 30,293-298.Vicky Feng Wei and Gord Lovegrove, 2010, “Sustainable Road Safety: A New Neighbourhood Road Pattern That Saves VRU (Vulnerable Road Users) Lives”, Accident Analysis & PreventionVogel, P., Greiser, T., & Mattfeld, D. C., 2011, “Understanding bike-sharing systems using data mining: Exploring activity patterns”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20:514-523Wesley E. Marshall and Norman W. Garrick (2011), “Evidence on Why Bike-Friendly Cities Are Safer for All Road Users,” Environmental Practice, 13(1)Zhao, J., Deng W., Song Y., 2014, “Ridership and effectiveness of bikesharing: The effects of urban features and system characteristics on daily use and turnover rate of public bikes in China”, Transport Policy, 35:253-264臺北市微笑單車系統官方網站，2016，營運成果「臺北市租賃次」，(2017/10/06)下載。http://taipei.youbike.com.tw/cht/f212.php?nid=5b0857440e1a6649ffc29cd93eba9b35&rows=20&page=1AARP, 2009, “Planning Complete Streets for an Aging America”, American Association for Retired Persons Public Policy Institute .Retrived Oct 8 on World Wide Web:www.aarp.org/ppiOwyang, J., 2013,. “The Collaborative Economy”. ALTIMETER, Retrived Oct 10 on World Wide Web:http://www. slideshare. net/Altimeter/the-collaborative-economyShared Use Mobility Center, 2017, “What is Shared-Use Mobility?”, Retrived Oct 10 on World Wide Web:http://sharedusemobilitycenter.org/what-is-shared-mobility/Stefanie Seskin and Lily Gordon-Koven, 2013, “Best Complete Streets Policies of 2012”, .Retrived Oct 8 on World Wide Web:www.completestreets.org、www.smartgrowthamerica.orgNew York City Department of Transportation, 2009, “Street Design Manual” Retrived Oct 8 on World Wide Web:http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/sdm_lores.pdfSan Francisco Planning Department, 2011, “San Francisco Better Streets Planning” Retrived Oct 8 on World Wide Web:http://www.sfplanning.org/ftp/BetterStreets/proposals.htm#Final_Plan.Transport for London, 2009, “Streetscape Guidance :ExecutiveSummary-A Guide to Better London Streets” Retrived Oct 8 on World Wide Web:http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/publications-and-reports/streetsNew York Departmentof Transportation, 2015, “Measuring the Street :New Metrics for 21st Century Streets” Retrived Oct 8 on World Wide Web:http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/2012-10-measuring-the-street.pdf. Smart Growth America , 2012, “Recent Lessons from the Stimulus:Transportation Funding and Job Creation” Retrived Oct 8 on World Wide Web:http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/documents/lessons-from-the-stimulus.pdf zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/THE.NCCU.LE.005.2018.A05 -
