dc.contributor | 財政系 | |
dc.creator (作者) | Lai, Yu‐Bong | |
dc.creator (作者) | 賴育邦 | |
dc.date (日期) | 2018-01 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 9-十一月-2018 15:04:12 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 9-十一月-2018 15:04:12 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 9-十一月-2018 15:04:12 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/120862 | - |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The two dividends in the double-dividend hypothesis are assumed to be independent. This assumption can be misleading when it comes to formulating policy. I construct a model where the pollution tax rate is voted for by heterogeneous people. In addition to the revenue-recycling effect, the equilibrium pollution tax rate depends on two opposite forces: the tax-cutting effect and the profit effect. The two forces show that an instrument that exploits a greater revenue-recycling effect can cause a more severe environmental deterioration, thereby resulting in the infeasibility of the hypothesis. The introduction of the interdependence between the two dividends can also mean that non-revenue-raising instruments are more efficient than revenue-raising instruments. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 158894 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.relation (關聯) | SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 120(1), 211-241 | |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Environmental policy; green tax reform; income inequality; political economy | |
dc.title (題名) | The Feasibility of the Double-Dividend Hypothesis in a Democratic Economy | en_US |
dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) | 10.1111/sjoe.12213 | |
dc.doi.uri (DOI) | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12213 | |