| dc.contributor | 政治系 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | 周家瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Chou, Chia-yu | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2015-09 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 7-十二月-2018 17:16:29 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 7-十二月-2018 17:16:29 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 7-十二月-2018 17:16:29 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121269 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | In order to answer the long-standing question of why Hobbes does not justify a world government as a super-Leviathan, this paper examines Hobbes’s accounts of international relations and the pre-civil state of nature. One common view tends to emphasize the differences between “the agents” in these two realms, namely states as artificial persons and individuals as natural persons; the other common view emphasizes the differences of “the relations between the agents”. By re-examining Hobbes’s account of the pre-civil state of nature, I argue that both of these common views are not sufficient. This essay intends to argue that if Hobbes’s assumption of equality about the original state of nature is re-examined, it can be seen that what actually causes a state of war is not so much the equal ability of men as men’s common tendency of considering themselves superior to others, namely vain-glory. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本文的問題意識在於：為何證成了國內主權者的霍布斯，未能繼續完成其 世界政府的推論，以及這是否是一個邏輯上的不一致。一般論者的回答可分兩 種：一、認為行為主體（國家與個人）的差異使得國際政治領域遠較原初自然 狀態緩和，因此不需要一個作為超級利維坦的世界政府；二、差異存在於行為 主體之間的關係。本文主要論證為：這兩種回答均有不足之處，若是深入檢視 霍布斯對於原初自然狀態的論述，本文試圖指出：原初自然狀態中的「人人認 為自己較他人優越」的心態平等為回答此一疑問的關鍵。 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 893972 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 人文及社會科學集刊, Vol.27, No.3, pp.445-470 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Hobbes; equality; vain-glory; world government; international relations | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 霍布斯;平等;虛榮之心;世界政府;國際關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | 為何不需要一個世界政府？─霍布斯論國際關係與自然狀態的(不)完美類比 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Why Not a World Government? Thomas Hobbes on a (Dis)qualified Analogy between State of Nature and International Relations | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
