學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 由歐洲聯盟循環經濟法制發展檢討我國廢棄物體管理法制之修正
Review on the waste management legislation in Taiwan from the perspective of the circular economy legislation in the European Union作者 翁敬翔
Weng, Ching-Hsiang貢獻者 傅玲靜
Fu, Ling-Ching
翁敬翔
Weng, Ching-Hsiang關鍵詞 循環經濟
物質循環
循環法制
廢棄物清理法
資源回收再利用法
廢棄物體
廢棄物體處置優先順序
廢棄物體性質認定之終止
Circular economy
Materials cycle
Circular economy legislation
Waste Disposal Act
Resource Recycling Act
Waste
Waste hierarchy
End of waste status日期 2019 上傳時間 5-九月-2019 16:23:06 (UTC+8) 摘要 我國現行的廢棄物體管理法制，係由廢棄物清理法及資源回收再利用法組合而成。二法在定義上嚴加區分廢棄物與再生資源，並分別施以不同管理的立法形式，近年卻在理論及實務上處處掣肘，尤其是與廢棄物相關之概念及處理原則。翻查二法過往的修法理由，本文觀察到，立法者似乎尚未清楚掌握廢棄物體管理法制背後應有的學理，以致於錯將傳統線性經濟的管制思維繼續沿用在意圖追求物質循環的管理系統上。關於物質循環的建構，歐洲聯盟的衍生法2008年廢棄物體框架指令走在相當前頭。為了進一步探究指令細節，本文欲從其立基的規範思維－循環經濟模式開始打底，並爬梳歐洲聯盟環境保護的發展歷史及其制訂衍生法指令的依據及理論規範，從而在之後正式分析廢棄物體框架指令有關廢棄物體之定義、廢棄物體處置優先順序的運作，以及廢棄物體性質認定之終止時，得以更為細緻地通盤瞭解規範之脈絡。若單就結論而言，本文認為廢棄物與再生資源本質實乃一體，廢棄物清理法與資源回收再利用法也僅是立法者片面擷取物質流動過程中不同時點的後果。我國若意欲將循環經濟模式導入廢棄物體管理法制，則根本不應著眼於目標客體之市場價值而割裂處理。在往後二法合一的立法嘗試中，應盡量放寬廢棄物體之認定，把握生命週期思考的原則，並且把守好事關物質循環成功與否的廢棄物體性質認定。
Taiwan’s waste management legislation in force consists of Waste Dispoeal Act and Resource Recycling Act. This legislative measure which strictly distinguishs the definition of waste and renewable resources and further differentiates the management systems, however, is impeded both in theory and practice recently. Such difficulties especially appear in the field of concepts related to waste and principles regarding handling it. By studing the whole amending process of the legislation, the thesis argues that the legislators seem haven’t realized the underpinned theory precisely, so that they kept using traditional regulative thoughts of the linear economy on the management system which intends to circulate materials.The secondary legislative Directive 2008/98/EC on waste of the European Union advantages considerably with reference to constructing materials cycles. To analyze details further, the thesis researches the underpinned theory - Circular Economy first. Then, in order to have better insights into main issues, including the definition of waste, waste hierarchy and End of Waste status, I will present the EU’s history of environmental protection action and its legal basis for enacting directives.In conclusion, the thesis suggests that waste and renewable resources possess the same essence, and that the form of two acts is the consequence of reckless separation made in the flow of materials by legislators. If we’re intending to introduce the mode of circular economy into waste management legislation, we shouldn’t have focused on its market value of the substance or object. Instead, the legislators should lower the threshold of waste, assure the principle of Life Cycle Thinking, and, last but not the least, certify the test of end of waste status concerning the coordination of the whole materials cycle.參考文獻 一、中文文獻（一）專書Donella Meadows, Jorgen Randers, Dennis Meadows著，高一中譯（2007），成長的極限－三十週年最新增訂版，臺灣：臉譜。[Meadows, Donella. Jorgen Randers & Dennis Meadows. 2004. Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. Chelsea Green Publishing]Nicolas Buttin, Brieuc Saffré著，陳郁雯譯（2018），啟動循環經濟－自然與經濟的共存之道，臺北：南方家園文化。[Buttin, Nicolas & Saffré, Brieuc. 2015. Activer L’économie Circulaire: Comment Réconcilier L’économie et la Nature. Eyrolles]王泰銓（1997），歐洲共同體法總論，臺北：三民。陳慈陽（2006），環境法各論（二）廢棄物質循環清理法制之研究，臺北：元照。陳慈陽（2011），環境法總論，3版，臺北：元照。陳麗娟（1999），阿姆斯特丹條約解讀，臺北：五南。陳麗娟（2013），里斯本條約後歐洲聯盟新面貌，2版，臺北：五南。黃育徵（2017），循環經濟，臺北：天下。鄒忠科、沈娟娟、蔡裕鎮（2011），歐洲聯盟史，臺北：五南。（二）期刊論文尤重道（2012），行政罰責任概念與責任類型暨責任競合問題之探討，全國律師，16卷7期，頁74-90。王毓正（2004），論國家環境保護任務之私化，月旦法學雜誌，104期，頁165-186。李建良（2000），永續發展與國家責任，臺北大學法學論叢，46期，頁79-112。李建良（2010），歐洲聯盟環境法的演進與發展－從經濟合作到環境共榮，法學叢刊，55卷4期，頁87-123。李建良（2014），「狀態責任」概念的辯證與運用：《台中大里區段徵收土地掩埋物清理案之一》－最高行政法院102年度判字第370號判決、台中高等行政法院99年度訴字第268號判決重點評析，台灣法學雜誌，246期，頁39-55。李建良（2015），營建廢棄物清理與環境影響評估之規範關聯－兼評最高行政法院103年度判字第475號判決，台灣法學雜誌，263期，頁25-46。李建良（2016），永續環境與有限政府─永續發展的民主課題，月旦法學雜誌，250卷，頁62-85。周錦國（2005），限制產品過度包裝草案，理律法律雜誌雙月刊，5月號，頁14-15。林孟楠（2016），基本法與行政領域之法統制－日本法及臺灣法之比較研究，華岡法粹，61期，頁109-133。林春元（2018），礦業法的「轉型正義」，台灣法學雜誌，337期，頁180-199。林書楷（2017），環境刑法之體系與難題，玄奘法律學報，27期，頁1-39。施世駿（2005），歐盟新治理模式與社會政策發展：「開放協調法」興起的歷史脈絡與政策意涵，台灣社會福利學刊，4卷1期，頁1-50。洪家殷（2015），論行政調查中之行政強制行為，法學論叢，60卷1期，頁29-58。高仁川（2017），從美國法的經驗論我國放射性廢棄物處置的當前困境與未來方向，法令月刊，68卷1期，頁52-89。張永明（2018），得靠法院清除廢棄物，月旦法學教室，187期，頁9-11。陳正根（2015），環保危害防止在刑事罰與行政罰之界線－兼論違反廢棄物清理法之處罰，臺灣環境與土地法學雜誌，14卷，頁83-97。陳愛娥（2003），行政組織法：第二講 國家角色變遷下的行政任務，月旦法學教室，3期，頁104-111。廖欽福（2014），廢棄物清理法第71 條第一項關於處分性質、時效適用及代履行費用分配基準之研析，法治與公共治理學報，2卷，頁93-128。劉如慧（2007），歐盟廢棄物處理相關法制之現況與發展概論，興大法學，2期，頁1-50。蔡茂寅（2001），廢棄物清理法實務與行政法院裁判評析，台灣本土法學雜誌，18期，頁113-127。魏國晉（2018），廢棄物清理法上「未經許可受託處理廢棄物罪」之行為主體釋疑－並引介德國環計另法之模式，69卷7期，頁83-107。（三）專書論文陳欣之（2011），從歐洲共同體到歐洲聯盟的發展 （1969-1990），收於：蘇宏達編，歐洲聯盟的歷史發展與理論辯論，頁103-148，臺北：臺大出版中心。藍玉春（2011），歐洲聯盟成立後的發展 （1990-2000），收於：蘇宏達編，歐洲聯盟的歷史發展與理論辯論，頁149-203，臺北：臺大出版中心。蘇宏達（2011），檢視古典現實主義對戴高樂時期歐洲統合運動發展的解釋 （1958-1969），收於：蘇宏達編，歐洲聯盟的歷史發展與理論辯論，頁43-101，臺北：臺大出版中心。蔡秀卿（2002），基本法之意義與課題，收於：翁岳生教授祝壽論文編輯委員會編，當代公法新論（中）─翁岳生教授七秩誕辰祝壽論文集，頁235-257，臺北：元照。（四）學位論文吳國智（2018），和牛養殖場循環經濟營運模式設計，中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。洪珮瑩（2017），企業導入循環經濟商業模式的轉型流程及工具評析，國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所碩士論文。葉安晉（2007），環境污染之刑事責任研究－以廢棄物清理法為中心，國立中正大學法律學研究所碩士論文。劉怡欣（2011），資源永續利用與循環經濟法制之研究，國立高雄大學法律學系碩士班碩士論文。蔡裕鎮（2012），歐洲聯盟授權立法委員會（Comitology）之研究，淡江大學歐洲研究所博士論文。戴呈安（2018），再生及再利用材料導入道路工程循環經濟應用之研究，國立中央大學土木工程碩士班碩士論文。鍾宏鳳（2017），應回收廢棄物管理制度相關法律研究－以廢電子電器暨廢資訊物品為中心，國立高雄第一科技大學科技法律研究所碩士專班碩士論文。二、英文文獻（一）專書Benyus, Janine M. 1997. Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature. London: HarperCollins Publishers Ltd.Calster, Geert Van. 2015. EU Waste Law. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Chalmers, Damian and Adam Tomkins. 2007. European Union Public Law: Text and Materials. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Clement, Keith. 2000. Economic Development and Environmental Gain: European Environmental Integration and Regional Competitiveness. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Hauschild, Michael Z., Ralph K. Roesnbaum, and Stig I. Olsen, eds. 2018. Life Cycle Assessment: Theory and Practice. Switzerland: Springer Nature.Jørgensen, Sven E., João C. Marques, and Søren N. Nielsen. 2016. Integrated Environmental Management: A Transdisciplinary Approach. CRC Press.Lee, Maria. 2005. EU Environmental Law: Challenges, Change and Decision-Making. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Mao, Jiansu, Yuansheng Pei, Chunhui Li and Linyu Xu. 2016. Circular Economy and Sustainable Development Enterprises. China: Springer Nature.McDonough, William, and Michael Braungart. 2002. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York, NY: North Point Press.Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Patterson, Dennis and Anna Södersten, eds., 2016. A Companion to European Union Law and International Law. Malden, MA: John Wiley &Sons, Inc.Pires, Ana. Martinho, Graça. Rodrigues, Susana. and Gomes, Maria I. 2019. Sustainable Solid Waste Collection and Management. Springer.Piris, Jean-Claude. 2010. The Lisbon Treaty: A Legal and Political Analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Stahel, Walter R. 2010. The Performance Economy. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Ugirashebuja, Emmanuel, John Eudes Ruhangisa, Tom Ottervanger and Armin Cuyvers, eds., 2017. East African Community Law: Institutional, Substantive and Comparative EU Aspects. Boston, MA: Brill.Weetman, Catherine. 2017. A Circular Economy Handbook for Business and Supply Chains: Repair, Remake, Redesign, Rethink. New York, NY: Kogan Page.Craig, Paul, and Gráinne de Búrca. 2011. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Brears, Robert C. 2018. Natural Resource Management and the Circular Economy. New Zealand: Palgrave Macmillan.（二）期刊論文Bartl, Andreas. 2015. Ways and Entanglements of the Waste Hierarchy. Waste Management 34:1-2.Calster, Geert Van. 2000. Inter-Environment. Columbia Journal of European Law 6: 124-132.Ewijk, Stijn V., and J.A. Stegemann. 2016. Limitations of the Waste Hierarchy for Achieving Absolute Reductions in Material Throughput, Journal of Cleaner Productiton 132:122-128.Fischer, Christian. 2011. The Development and Achievements of EU Waste Policy. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 13:2-9.Fluck, Jürgen. 1994. The Term “Waste” in EU Law. European Energy and Environmental Law Review 3:79-84.Gregson, Nicky, Mike Crang, Jennifer Laws, Tamlynn Fleetwood, and Helen Holmes. 2013. Moving Up the Waste Hierarchy: Car Boot Sales, Reuse Exchange and the Challenges of Consumer Culture to Waste Prevention. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 77: 97-107.Hughes, Richard. 2017. The EU Circular Economy Package-Life Cycle Thinking To Life Cycle Law?. Procedia CIRP 61:10-16.Hutner, Petra, Andrea Thorenz, and Axel Tuma. 2016. Waste Prevention in Communities: A Comprehensive Survey Analyzing Status Quo, Potentials, Barriers and Measures. Journal of Cleaner Production 141:837-851.Knauf, Marcus. 2015. Waste Hierarchy Revisited-An Evaluation of Waste Wood Recycling in The Context of EU Energy Policy and The European Market. Forest Policy Economics 54:58-60.Lazarevic, David. & Nicolas Buclet, and Nils Brandt. 2012. The Application of Life Cycle Thinking in The Context of European Waste Policy. Journal of Cleaner Production 29-30:199-207.Manfredi, Simone, Rana Pant, David W. Pennington, and Andreas Versmann. 2011. Supporting Environmentally Sound Decisions for Waste Management with LCT and LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16:937-939.Papargyropoulou, Effle, Rodrigo Lozano, Julla Steinberger, Nlgel G. Wright and Zaini B. Ujang. 2014. The Food Waste Hierarchy as a Framework for the Management of Food Surplus and Food Waste. Journal of Cleaner Production 76:106-115.Schütze, Robert. 2011. ‘Delegated’ Legislation in the (new) European Union: A Constitutional Analysis. Modern Law Review 74:661-693.Trubek, David M. and Louise G. Trubek. 2006. New Governance & Legal Regulation: Complementarity, Rivalry, and Transformation. Columbia Journal of European Law 13:1-26.Williams, Ian. 2015. Forty Years of the Waste Hierarchy. Waste Management 40:1-2.Wilson, David C. 1996. Stick or Carrot?: The Use of Policy Measures to Move Waste Management Up the Hierarchy. Waste Management & Research 14:385-398.Wilson, David C. 2007. Development Drivers for Waste Management. Waste Management & Research 25:198-207.Zorpas, Antonis A. 2016. Sustainable Waste Management Through End-of-Waste Criteria Development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23:7376-7389.Tromans, Stephen. 2001. EC Waste Law – A Complete Mess?. Journal of Environmental Law 13:2:133-156.（三）專書論文Bogdandy, Armin von, and Jürgen Bast. 2011 The Federal Order of Competences. Pp. 275-307 in Principles of European Constitutional Law, 2nd ed., edited by Armin von Bogdandy and Jürgen Bast. Portland, OR: Hart Oublishing.Boulding, Kenneth E. 2011. The Economics of The Coming Spaceship Earth. Pp. 3-14 in Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy: Essays from the Sixth RFF Forum, 2ND, edited by Henry Jarrett. New York, NY: Earthscan.Dashwood, Alan. 2009. The Institutional Framework and the Institutional Balance. Pp. 1-17 in 50 Years of the European Treaties: Looking Back and Thinking Forward, edited by Michael Dougan and Samantha Currie. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Frosch, Robert A. 1997. Closing the Loop on Waste Materials. Pp. 37-47 in The Industrial Green Game: Implication for Environmental Design and Management, edited by Deanna J. Richards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Greenwood, Justin. and Christilla Roederer-Rynning. 2019. Taming Trilogues: The EU’s Law-Making Process in a Comparative Perspective. Pp. 121-141 in The European Parliament in Times of EU Crisis: Dynamics and Transformation, edited by Costa Olivier. Palgrave Macmillan.Holley, Cameron. 2017. Environmental Regulation and Governance. Pp. 741-758 in Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications, edited by Peter Drahos. Australia: ANU Press.Krämer, Ludwig. 2013. Giving a Voice to the Environment by Challenging the Practice of Integrating Environmental Requirements into Other EU Policies. Pp. 83-101 in European Perspectives on Environmental Law and Governance, edited by Suzanne Kingston. New York, NY: Routledge.Laursen, Finn. 2018. Overview of Institutional Choices and Beginning Implementation. Pp. 103-118 in The EU’s Lisbon Treaty: Institutional Choices and Implementation, edited by Finn Laursen. Routledge.Marissen, Vicky. 2019. The European Parliament and EU Secondary Legislation: Improved Scrutiny Practices and Upstream Involvement for Delegated Acts and Implementing Acts. Pp. 143-159 in The European Parliament in Times of EU Crisis: Dynamics and Transformation, edited by Costa Olivier. Palgrave Macmillan.Mcintyre, Owen. 2013. The Integration Challenge: Integrating Environmental Concerns into Other EU Policies. Pp. 125-143 in European Perspectives on Environmental Law and Governance, edited by Suzanne Kingston. New York, NY: Routledge.Ruiter, Rik de. and Christine Neuhold. 2018. The Winner Takes It All? The Implications of the Lisbon Treaty for the EPs Legislative Role in Co-Decision. Pp. 103-118 in The EU’s Lisbon Treaty: Institutional Choices and Implementation, edited by Finn Laursen. Routledge.Schütze, Robert. 2009. The European Community’s Federal Order of Competences-A Retrospective Analysis. Pp. 63-92 in 50 Years of the European Treaties: Looking Back and Thinking Forward, edited by Michael Dougan and Samantha Currie. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Stahel, Walter R. 1997. The Functional Economy: Culture and Organizational Change. Pp. 91-100 in The Industrial Green Game: Implication for Environmental Design and Management, edited by Deanna J. Richards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Römph, Thomas J. de. 2016. Pressing Forward-Developments in the Transition Towards Sustainable Materials Management in EU Environmental Law. Pp. 511-532 in Legal Aspects of Sustainable Development: Horizontal and Sectorial Policy Issues, edited by Volker Mauerhofer. Switzerland:Springer.（四）網路資料European Commission, Guidance on the interpretation of key provisions of Directive 2008/98/EC on waste, (Jun. 2012), http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/framework/guidance.htm.United Nations, Documents, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (Mar. 20, 1987), http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf.McKinsey Global Institute, Resource Revolution: Meeting the world’s energy, materials, food, and water needs (Nov. 24, 2011), https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/resource-revolution.Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Publications, Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition (Jan. 25, 2012), https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Publications, Global Food Losses and Food Waste: Extent, Causes and Prevention (2011), http://www.fao.org/publications/en/.Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Publications, Towards the Circular Economy: Opportunities for the Consumer Goods Sector (Jan. 25, 2013), https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications.UNEP, Reprots and Data, Recycling Rates of Metals: A Status Report (May. 2011), http://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/recycling-rates-metals.United States Environmental Protection Agency, Archives, Buildings and their Impact on the Environment: A Statistical Summary (Apr. 22, 2009), https://archive.epa.gov.McKinsey Global Institute, Our Research, Resource Revolution: Tracking global commodity markets (Sep. 2013), https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/our-research/natural-resources.United Nations, Publications (Population Division Publications), World Population 2017, (2017), https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2017_Wallchart.pdf.United States Environmental Protection Agency, Climate Change Indicators in the United States (Dec. 2012), https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators.McKinsey & Company, McKinsey on Sustainability & Resource Productivity, Number 1 (2012), https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/mckinsey-on-sustainability-and-resource-productivity.Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Publications, Towards the Circular Economy: Accelerating the Scale-up across Global Supply Chains (Jan. 24, 2014), https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications.McKinsey & Company, The Circular Economy: Moving from Theory to Practice (Oct. 2016), https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/the-circular-economy-moving-from-theory-to-practice.European Parliament, Circular economy package: Four legislative proposals on waste (2017), http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2017/599288/EPRS_BRI%282017%29599288_EN.pdf.（五）法院判決Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 February 2003, Commission of the European Communities v. Federal Republic of Germany, Case C-228/00, ECR 2003 I-01439.Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 June 2000, ARCO Chemie Nederland Ltd v. Minister van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milierbeheer (Case C-418/97) and Vereniging Gorpsbelang Hees, Stichting Werkgroep Weurt+, Vereniging Stedelijk Leefmilieu Nijmegen v. Directeur van de dienst Milieu en Water van de provincie Gelderland (C-419/97), Joined Case C-418/97 and C-419/97, ECR 2000 I-04475.Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 February 2002, Abfall Service AG (ASA) v. Bundesminister für Umwelt, Jugend and Familie, Case C-6/00, ECR 2002 I-01961.Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 February 2002, Abfall Service AG (ASA) v. Bundesminister für Umwelt, Jugend und Familie, Case C-6/00, ECR 2002 I-01961.Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 April 2003, SITA EcoService Nederland BV, formerly Verol Recycling Limburg BV v. Minister van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer, Case C-116/01, ECR 2003 I-01439.Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 March 1990, Criminal proceedings against G. Vessoso and G. Zanetti, Joined Cases C-206/88 and C-207/88, ECR 1990 I-01461.Judgment of the Court (Forth Chamber) of 26 September 2013, Industrie du bois de Vielsalm & Cie (IBV) SA v. Région wallonne, Case C-195/12, ECL:EU:C:2013:598.Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2004, Criminal proceedings against Antonio Niselli, Case C-457/02, ECR 2004 I-10853.Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2003, AvestaPolarit Chrome Oy, Case C-114/01, ECR 2003 I-08725.Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 April 2002, Palin Granit Oy and Vehmassalon kandanterveystyön kuntayhtymän hallitus, Case C-9/00, ECR 2002 I-03533.Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 1997, Criminal proceedings against Euro Tombesi and Adino Tombesi (C-304/94), Roberto Santella (C-330/94), Giovanni Muzi and others (C-342/94) and Anselmo Savini (C-224/95), Joined Cases C-304/94, C-330/94, C-342/94 and C-224/95, ECR 1997 I-03561.Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2019, Associazione “Verdi Ambiente e Società - Aps Onlus” (VAS) and “Movimento Legge Rifiuti Zero per I’Economia Circolare” Aps v Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others, Case C-305/18, ECLI:EU:C:2019:384.Judgment of the Court of 18 December 1997, Inter Environment Wallonie ASLB v. Région Wallonne, Case C-129/96, ECR 1997 I-07411.Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 January 2004, Criminal proceedings against Marco Antonio Saetti and Andrea Frediani, Case C-235/02, ECR 2004 I-01005. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
法律學系
1046510412資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1046510412 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 傅玲靜 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Fu, Ling-Ching en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 翁敬翔 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Weng, Ching-Hsiang en_US dc.creator (作者) 翁敬翔 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Weng, Ching-Hsiang en_US dc.date (日期) 2019 en_US dc.date.accessioned 5-九月-2019 16:23:06 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 5-九月-2019 16:23:06 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-九月-2019 16:23:06 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G1046510412 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125673 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 法律學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 1046510412 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 我國現行的廢棄物體管理法制，係由廢棄物清理法及資源回收再利用法組合而成。二法在定義上嚴加區分廢棄物與再生資源，並分別施以不同管理的立法形式，近年卻在理論及實務上處處掣肘，尤其是與廢棄物相關之概念及處理原則。翻查二法過往的修法理由，本文觀察到，立法者似乎尚未清楚掌握廢棄物體管理法制背後應有的學理，以致於錯將傳統線性經濟的管制思維繼續沿用在意圖追求物質循環的管理系統上。關於物質循環的建構，歐洲聯盟的衍生法2008年廢棄物體框架指令走在相當前頭。為了進一步探究指令細節，本文欲從其立基的規範思維－循環經濟模式開始打底，並爬梳歐洲聯盟環境保護的發展歷史及其制訂衍生法指令的依據及理論規範，從而在之後正式分析廢棄物體框架指令有關廢棄物體之定義、廢棄物體處置優先順序的運作，以及廢棄物體性質認定之終止時，得以更為細緻地通盤瞭解規範之脈絡。若單就結論而言，本文認為廢棄物與再生資源本質實乃一體，廢棄物清理法與資源回收再利用法也僅是立法者片面擷取物質流動過程中不同時點的後果。我國若意欲將循環經濟模式導入廢棄物體管理法制，則根本不應著眼於目標客體之市場價值而割裂處理。在往後二法合一的立法嘗試中，應盡量放寬廢棄物體之認定，把握生命週期思考的原則，並且把守好事關物質循環成功與否的廢棄物體性質認定。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Taiwan’s waste management legislation in force consists of Waste Dispoeal Act and Resource Recycling Act. This legislative measure which strictly distinguishs the definition of waste and renewable resources and further differentiates the management systems, however, is impeded both in theory and practice recently. Such difficulties especially appear in the field of concepts related to waste and principles regarding handling it. By studing the whole amending process of the legislation, the thesis argues that the legislators seem haven’t realized the underpinned theory precisely, so that they kept using traditional regulative thoughts of the linear economy on the management system which intends to circulate materials.The secondary legislative Directive 2008/98/EC on waste of the European Union advantages considerably with reference to constructing materials cycles. To analyze details further, the thesis researches the underpinned theory - Circular Economy first. Then, in order to have better insights into main issues, including the definition of waste, waste hierarchy and End of Waste status, I will present the EU’s history of environmental protection action and its legal basis for enacting directives.In conclusion, the thesis suggests that waste and renewable resources possess the same essence, and that the form of two acts is the consequence of reckless separation made in the flow of materials by legislators. If we’re intending to introduce the mode of circular economy into waste management legislation, we shouldn’t have focused on its market value of the substance or object. Instead, the legislators should lower the threshold of waste, assure the principle of Life Cycle Thinking, and, last but not the least, certify the test of end of waste status concerning the coordination of the whole materials cycle. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究動機 1第二節 研究範圍及其限制 3第三節 概念說明－關於waste一詞之翻譯 7第四節 文獻回顧 9第五節 研究方法及研究架構 11第二章 由線性經濟至循環經濟 15第一節 線性經濟之發展及困境 15第二節 具有不同面向之循環經濟 22第三節 實際案例 30第四節 小結 33第三章 導入循環經濟的歐洲聯盟環境政策與法制 35第一節 循序漸進的歐洲聯盟環境政策 35第二節 里斯本條約對歐洲聯盟法制之重大影響 54第三節 2008年廢棄物體框架指令與2018年廢棄物體修正指令簡介 66第四節 小結 71第四章 框架指令中廢棄物體之性質界定及處置優先順序 73第一節 廢棄物體之定義及範圍 73第二節 廢棄物體處置優先順序 86第三節 廢棄物體性質之終止 106第四節 小結 116第五章 我國廢棄物體管理法制之觀察及檢討 117第一節 現行法之規範及司法實務見解 117第二節 對於物質循環法制立法草案之觀察 130第三節 小結—對於立法之建議 136第六章 結論 139參考文獻 141 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1966375 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1046510412 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 循環經濟 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 物質循環 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 循環法制 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 廢棄物清理法 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資源回收再利用法 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 廢棄物體 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 廢棄物體處置優先順序 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 廢棄物體性質認定之終止 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Circular economy en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Materials cycle en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Circular economy legislation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Waste Disposal Act en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Resource Recycling Act en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Waste en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Waste hierarchy en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) End of waste status en_US dc.title (題名) 由歐洲聯盟循環經濟法制發展檢討我國廢棄物體管理法制之修正 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Review on the waste management legislation in Taiwan from the perspective of the circular economy legislation in the European Union en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文文獻（一）專書Donella Meadows, Jorgen Randers, Dennis Meadows著，高一中譯（2007），成長的極限－三十週年最新增訂版，臺灣：臉譜。[Meadows, Donella. Jorgen Randers & Dennis Meadows. 2004. Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. Chelsea Green Publishing]Nicolas Buttin, Brieuc Saffré著，陳郁雯譯（2018），啟動循環經濟－自然與經濟的共存之道，臺北：南方家園文化。[Buttin, Nicolas & Saffré, Brieuc. 2015. Activer L’économie Circulaire: Comment Réconcilier L’économie et la Nature. Eyrolles]王泰銓（1997），歐洲共同體法總論，臺北：三民。陳慈陽（2006），環境法各論（二）廢棄物質循環清理法制之研究，臺北：元照。陳慈陽（2011），環境法總論，3版，臺北：元照。陳麗娟（1999），阿姆斯特丹條約解讀，臺北：五南。陳麗娟（2013），里斯本條約後歐洲聯盟新面貌，2版，臺北：五南。黃育徵（2017），循環經濟，臺北：天下。鄒忠科、沈娟娟、蔡裕鎮（2011），歐洲聯盟史，臺北：五南。（二）期刊論文尤重道（2012），行政罰責任概念與責任類型暨責任競合問題之探討，全國律師，16卷7期，頁74-90。王毓正（2004），論國家環境保護任務之私化，月旦法學雜誌，104期，頁165-186。李建良（2000），永續發展與國家責任，臺北大學法學論叢，46期，頁79-112。李建良（2010），歐洲聯盟環境法的演進與發展－從經濟合作到環境共榮，法學叢刊，55卷4期，頁87-123。李建良（2014），「狀態責任」概念的辯證與運用：《台中大里區段徵收土地掩埋物清理案之一》－最高行政法院102年度判字第370號判決、台中高等行政法院99年度訴字第268號判決重點評析，台灣法學雜誌，246期，頁39-55。李建良（2015），營建廢棄物清理與環境影響評估之規範關聯－兼評最高行政法院103年度判字第475號判決，台灣法學雜誌，263期，頁25-46。李建良（2016），永續環境與有限政府─永續發展的民主課題，月旦法學雜誌，250卷，頁62-85。周錦國（2005），限制產品過度包裝草案，理律法律雜誌雙月刊，5月號，頁14-15。林孟楠（2016），基本法與行政領域之法統制－日本法及臺灣法之比較研究，華岡法粹，61期，頁109-133。林春元（2018），礦業法的「轉型正義」，台灣法學雜誌，337期，頁180-199。林書楷（2017），環境刑法之體系與難題，玄奘法律學報，27期，頁1-39。施世駿（2005），歐盟新治理模式與社會政策發展：「開放協調法」興起的歷史脈絡與政策意涵，台灣社會福利學刊，4卷1期，頁1-50。洪家殷（2015），論行政調查中之行政強制行為，法學論叢，60卷1期，頁29-58。高仁川（2017），從美國法的經驗論我國放射性廢棄物處置的當前困境與未來方向，法令月刊，68卷1期，頁52-89。張永明（2018），得靠法院清除廢棄物，月旦法學教室，187期，頁9-11。陳正根（2015），環保危害防止在刑事罰與行政罰之界線－兼論違反廢棄物清理法之處罰，臺灣環境與土地法學雜誌，14卷，頁83-97。陳愛娥（2003），行政組織法：第二講 國家角色變遷下的行政任務，月旦法學教室，3期，頁104-111。廖欽福（2014），廢棄物清理法第71 條第一項關於處分性質、時效適用及代履行費用分配基準之研析，法治與公共治理學報，2卷，頁93-128。劉如慧（2007），歐盟廢棄物處理相關法制之現況與發展概論，興大法學，2期，頁1-50。蔡茂寅（2001），廢棄物清理法實務與行政法院裁判評析，台灣本土法學雜誌，18期，頁113-127。魏國晉（2018），廢棄物清理法上「未經許可受託處理廢棄物罪」之行為主體釋疑－並引介德國環計另法之模式，69卷7期，頁83-107。（三）專書論文陳欣之（2011），從歐洲共同體到歐洲聯盟的發展 （1969-1990），收於：蘇宏達編，歐洲聯盟的歷史發展與理論辯論，頁103-148，臺北：臺大出版中心。藍玉春（2011），歐洲聯盟成立後的發展 （1990-2000），收於：蘇宏達編，歐洲聯盟的歷史發展與理論辯論，頁149-203，臺北：臺大出版中心。蘇宏達（2011），檢視古典現實主義對戴高樂時期歐洲統合運動發展的解釋 （1958-1969），收於：蘇宏達編，歐洲聯盟的歷史發展與理論辯論，頁43-101，臺北：臺大出版中心。蔡秀卿（2002），基本法之意義與課題，收於：翁岳生教授祝壽論文編輯委員會編，當代公法新論（中）─翁岳生教授七秩誕辰祝壽論文集，頁235-257，臺北：元照。（四）學位論文吳國智（2018），和牛養殖場循環經濟營運模式設計，中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。洪珮瑩（2017），企業導入循環經濟商業模式的轉型流程及工具評析，國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所碩士論文。葉安晉（2007），環境污染之刑事責任研究－以廢棄物清理法為中心，國立中正大學法律學研究所碩士論文。劉怡欣（2011），資源永續利用與循環經濟法制之研究，國立高雄大學法律學系碩士班碩士論文。蔡裕鎮（2012），歐洲聯盟授權立法委員會（Comitology）之研究，淡江大學歐洲研究所博士論文。戴呈安（2018），再生及再利用材料導入道路工程循環經濟應用之研究，國立中央大學土木工程碩士班碩士論文。鍾宏鳳（2017），應回收廢棄物管理制度相關法律研究－以廢電子電器暨廢資訊物品為中心，國立高雄第一科技大學科技法律研究所碩士專班碩士論文。二、英文文獻（一）專書Benyus, Janine M. 1997. Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature. London: HarperCollins Publishers Ltd.Calster, Geert Van. 2015. EU Waste Law. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Chalmers, Damian and Adam Tomkins. 2007. European Union Public Law: Text and Materials. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Clement, Keith. 2000. Economic Development and Environmental Gain: European Environmental Integration and Regional Competitiveness. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Hauschild, Michael Z., Ralph K. Roesnbaum, and Stig I. Olsen, eds. 2018. Life Cycle Assessment: Theory and Practice. Switzerland: Springer Nature.Jørgensen, Sven E., João C. Marques, and Søren N. Nielsen. 2016. Integrated Environmental Management: A Transdisciplinary Approach. CRC Press.Lee, Maria. 2005. EU Environmental Law: Challenges, Change and Decision-Making. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Mao, Jiansu, Yuansheng Pei, Chunhui Li and Linyu Xu. 2016. Circular Economy and Sustainable Development Enterprises. China: Springer Nature.McDonough, William, and Michael Braungart. 2002. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York, NY: North Point Press.Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Patterson, Dennis and Anna Södersten, eds., 2016. A Companion to European Union Law and International Law. Malden, MA: John Wiley &Sons, Inc.Pires, Ana. Martinho, Graça. Rodrigues, Susana. and Gomes, Maria I. 2019. Sustainable Solid Waste Collection and Management. Springer.Piris, Jean-Claude. 2010. The Lisbon Treaty: A Legal and Political Analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Stahel, Walter R. 2010. The Performance Economy. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Ugirashebuja, Emmanuel, John Eudes Ruhangisa, Tom Ottervanger and Armin Cuyvers, eds., 2017. East African Community Law: Institutional, Substantive and Comparative EU Aspects. Boston, MA: Brill.Weetman, Catherine. 2017. A Circular Economy Handbook for Business and Supply Chains: Repair, Remake, Redesign, Rethink. New York, NY: Kogan Page.Craig, Paul, and Gráinne de Búrca. 2011. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Brears, Robert C. 2018. Natural Resource Management and the Circular Economy. New Zealand: Palgrave Macmillan.（二）期刊論文Bartl, Andreas. 2015. Ways and Entanglements of the Waste Hierarchy. Waste Management 34:1-2.Calster, Geert Van. 2000. Inter-Environment. Columbia Journal of European Law 6: 124-132.Ewijk, Stijn V., and J.A. Stegemann. 2016. Limitations of the Waste Hierarchy for Achieving Absolute Reductions in Material Throughput, Journal of Cleaner Productiton 132:122-128.Fischer, Christian. 2011. The Development and Achievements of EU Waste Policy. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 13:2-9.Fluck, Jürgen. 1994. The Term “Waste” in EU Law. European Energy and Environmental Law Review 3:79-84.Gregson, Nicky, Mike Crang, Jennifer Laws, Tamlynn Fleetwood, and Helen Holmes. 2013. Moving Up the Waste Hierarchy: Car Boot Sales, Reuse Exchange and the Challenges of Consumer Culture to Waste Prevention. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 77: 97-107.Hughes, Richard. 2017. The EU Circular Economy Package-Life Cycle Thinking To Life Cycle Law?. Procedia CIRP 61:10-16.Hutner, Petra, Andrea Thorenz, and Axel Tuma. 2016. Waste Prevention in Communities: A Comprehensive Survey Analyzing Status Quo, Potentials, Barriers and Measures. Journal of Cleaner Production 141:837-851.Knauf, Marcus. 2015. Waste Hierarchy Revisited-An Evaluation of Waste Wood Recycling in The Context of EU Energy Policy and The European Market. Forest Policy Economics 54:58-60.Lazarevic, David. & Nicolas Buclet, and Nils Brandt. 2012. The Application of Life Cycle Thinking in The Context of European Waste Policy. Journal of Cleaner Production 29-30:199-207.Manfredi, Simone, Rana Pant, David W. Pennington, and Andreas Versmann. 2011. Supporting Environmentally Sound Decisions for Waste Management with LCT and LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16:937-939.Papargyropoulou, Effle, Rodrigo Lozano, Julla Steinberger, Nlgel G. Wright and Zaini B. Ujang. 2014. The Food Waste Hierarchy as a Framework for the Management of Food Surplus and Food Waste. Journal of Cleaner Production 76:106-115.Schütze, Robert. 2011. ‘Delegated’ Legislation in the (new) European Union: A Constitutional Analysis. Modern Law Review 74:661-693.Trubek, David M. and Louise G. Trubek. 2006. New Governance & Legal Regulation: Complementarity, Rivalry, and Transformation. Columbia Journal of European Law 13:1-26.Williams, Ian. 2015. Forty Years of the Waste Hierarchy. Waste Management 40:1-2.Wilson, David C. 1996. Stick or Carrot?: The Use of Policy Measures to Move Waste Management Up the Hierarchy. Waste Management & Research 14:385-398.Wilson, David C. 2007. Development Drivers for Waste Management. Waste Management & Research 25:198-207.Zorpas, Antonis A. 2016. Sustainable Waste Management Through End-of-Waste Criteria Development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23:7376-7389.Tromans, Stephen. 2001. EC Waste Law – A Complete Mess?. Journal of Environmental Law 13:2:133-156.（三）專書論文Bogdandy, Armin von, and Jürgen Bast. 2011 The Federal Order of Competences. Pp. 275-307 in Principles of European Constitutional Law, 2nd ed., edited by Armin von Bogdandy and Jürgen Bast. Portland, OR: Hart Oublishing.Boulding, Kenneth E. 2011. The Economics of The Coming Spaceship Earth. Pp. 3-14 in Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy: Essays from the Sixth RFF Forum, 2ND, edited by Henry Jarrett. New York, NY: Earthscan.Dashwood, Alan. 2009. The Institutional Framework and the Institutional Balance. Pp. 1-17 in 50 Years of the European Treaties: Looking Back and Thinking Forward, edited by Michael Dougan and Samantha Currie. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Frosch, Robert A. 1997. Closing the Loop on Waste Materials. Pp. 37-47 in The Industrial Green Game: Implication for Environmental Design and Management, edited by Deanna J. Richards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Greenwood, Justin. and Christilla Roederer-Rynning. 2019. Taming Trilogues: The EU’s Law-Making Process in a Comparative Perspective. Pp. 121-141 in The European Parliament in Times of EU Crisis: Dynamics and Transformation, edited by Costa Olivier. Palgrave Macmillan.Holley, Cameron. 2017. Environmental Regulation and Governance. Pp. 741-758 in Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications, edited by Peter Drahos. Australia: ANU Press.Krämer, Ludwig. 2013. Giving a Voice to the Environment by Challenging the Practice of Integrating Environmental Requirements into Other EU Policies. Pp. 83-101 in European Perspectives on Environmental Law and Governance, edited by Suzanne Kingston. New York, NY: Routledge.Laursen, Finn. 2018. Overview of Institutional Choices and Beginning Implementation. Pp. 103-118 in The EU’s Lisbon Treaty: Institutional Choices and Implementation, edited by Finn Laursen. Routledge.Marissen, Vicky. 2019. The European Parliament and EU Secondary Legislation: Improved Scrutiny Practices and Upstream Involvement for Delegated Acts and Implementing Acts. Pp. 143-159 in The European Parliament in Times of EU Crisis: Dynamics and Transformation, edited by Costa Olivier. Palgrave Macmillan.Mcintyre, Owen. 2013. The Integration Challenge: Integrating Environmental Concerns into Other EU Policies. Pp. 125-143 in European Perspectives on Environmental Law and Governance, edited by Suzanne Kingston. New York, NY: Routledge.Ruiter, Rik de. and Christine Neuhold. 2018. The Winner Takes It All? The Implications of the Lisbon Treaty for the EPs Legislative Role in Co-Decision. Pp. 103-118 in The EU’s Lisbon Treaty: Institutional Choices and Implementation, edited by Finn Laursen. Routledge.Schütze, Robert. 2009. The European Community’s Federal Order of Competences-A Retrospective Analysis. Pp. 63-92 in 50 Years of the European Treaties: Looking Back and Thinking Forward, edited by Michael Dougan and Samantha Currie. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Stahel, Walter R. 1997. The Functional Economy: Culture and Organizational Change. Pp. 91-100 in The Industrial Green Game: Implication for Environmental Design and Management, edited by Deanna J. Richards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Römph, Thomas J. de. 2016. Pressing Forward-Developments in the Transition Towards Sustainable Materials Management in EU Environmental Law. Pp. 511-532 in Legal Aspects of Sustainable Development: Horizontal and Sectorial Policy Issues, edited by Volker Mauerhofer. Switzerland:Springer.（四）網路資料European Commission, Guidance on the interpretation of key provisions of Directive 2008/98/EC on waste, (Jun. 2012), http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/framework/guidance.htm.United Nations, Documents, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (Mar. 20, 1987), http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf.McKinsey Global Institute, Resource Revolution: Meeting the world’s energy, materials, food, and water needs (Nov. 24, 2011), https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/resource-revolution.Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Publications, Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition (Jan. 25, 2012), https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Publications, Global Food Losses and Food Waste: Extent, Causes and Prevention (2011), http://www.fao.org/publications/en/.Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Publications, Towards the Circular Economy: Opportunities for the Consumer Goods Sector (Jan. 25, 2013), https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications.UNEP, Reprots and Data, Recycling Rates of Metals: A Status Report (May. 2011), http://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/recycling-rates-metals.United States Environmental Protection Agency, Archives, Buildings and their Impact on the Environment: A Statistical Summary (Apr. 22, 2009), https://archive.epa.gov.McKinsey Global Institute, Our Research, Resource Revolution: Tracking global commodity markets (Sep. 2013), https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/our-research/natural-resources.United Nations, Publications (Population Division Publications), World Population 2017, (2017), https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2017_Wallchart.pdf.United States Environmental Protection Agency, Climate Change Indicators in the United States (Dec. 2012), https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators.McKinsey & Company, McKinsey on Sustainability & Resource Productivity, Number 1 (2012), https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/mckinsey-on-sustainability-and-resource-productivity.Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Publications, Towards the Circular Economy: Accelerating the Scale-up across Global Supply Chains (Jan. 24, 2014), https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications.McKinsey & Company, The Circular Economy: Moving from Theory to Practice (Oct. 2016), https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/the-circular-economy-moving-from-theory-to-practice.European Parliament, Circular economy package: Four legislative proposals on waste (2017), http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2017/599288/EPRS_BRI%282017%29599288_EN.pdf.（五）法院判決Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 February 2003, Commission of the European Communities v. Federal Republic of Germany, Case C-228/00, ECR 2003 I-01439.Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 June 2000, ARCO Chemie Nederland Ltd v. Minister van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milierbeheer (Case C-418/97) and Vereniging Gorpsbelang Hees, Stichting Werkgroep Weurt+, Vereniging Stedelijk Leefmilieu Nijmegen v. Directeur van de dienst Milieu en Water van de provincie Gelderland (C-419/97), Joined Case C-418/97 and C-419/97, ECR 2000 I-04475.Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 February 2002, Abfall Service AG (ASA) v. Bundesminister für Umwelt, Jugend and Familie, Case C-6/00, ECR 2002 I-01961.Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 February 2002, Abfall Service AG (ASA) v. Bundesminister für Umwelt, Jugend und Familie, Case C-6/00, ECR 2002 I-01961.Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 April 2003, SITA EcoService Nederland BV, formerly Verol Recycling Limburg BV v. Minister van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer, Case C-116/01, ECR 2003 I-01439.Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 March 1990, Criminal proceedings against G. Vessoso and G. Zanetti, Joined Cases C-206/88 and C-207/88, ECR 1990 I-01461.Judgment of the Court (Forth Chamber) of 26 September 2013, Industrie du bois de Vielsalm & Cie (IBV) SA v. Région wallonne, Case C-195/12, ECL:EU:C:2013:598.Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2004, Criminal proceedings against Antonio Niselli, Case C-457/02, ECR 2004 I-10853.Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2003, AvestaPolarit Chrome Oy, Case C-114/01, ECR 2003 I-08725.Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 April 2002, Palin Granit Oy and Vehmassalon kandanterveystyön kuntayhtymän hallitus, Case C-9/00, ECR 2002 I-03533.Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 1997, Criminal proceedings against Euro Tombesi and Adino Tombesi (C-304/94), Roberto Santella (C-330/94), Giovanni Muzi and others (C-342/94) and Anselmo Savini (C-224/95), Joined Cases C-304/94, C-330/94, C-342/94 and C-224/95, ECR 1997 I-03561.Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2019, Associazione “Verdi Ambiente e Società - Aps Onlus” (VAS) and “Movimento Legge Rifiuti Zero per I’Economia Circolare” Aps v Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others, Case C-305/18, ECLI:EU:C:2019:384.Judgment of the Court of 18 December 1997, Inter Environment Wallonie ASLB v. Région Wallonne, Case C-129/96, ECR 1997 I-07411.Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 January 2004, Criminal proceedings against Marco Antonio Saetti and Andrea Frediani, Case C-235/02, ECR 2004 I-01005. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU201900789 en_US
