1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 社會科學學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 年輕勞動力市場的職業同質性與動員社會資本機制：以2010 TEPS-B為例
Occupational Homophily and the Mechanism of Mobilized Social Capital in Labour Market of Young Adults: Evidence from 2010 TEPS-B in Taiwan
作者 林昌逸
Lin, Chang-Yi
貢獻者 熊瑞梅
Hsung, Ray-May
林昌逸
Lin, Chang-Yi
關鍵詞 社會資本
年輕勞動力市場
職業同質性
非主動求職
親屬聯繫
social capital
labor market of young adults
occupational homophily
nonsearch
kinship tie
日期 2019
上傳時間 5-九月-2019 17:07:16 (UTC+8)
摘要 過去有關年輕勞動力市場的動員社會資本與求職的研究並不是那麼豐富。本論文企圖與過去文獻對話，提出三個研究問題，並分別於三章進行分析探討。第一個問題是在年輕勞動力市場中，非主動求職者（亦即在沒有從事求職情況下獲得工作的人）相對會有較好的地位取得嗎？第二個問題回到林南社會資源理論最一開始的源頭，發現了一條在後來不受重視但卻十分重要的聯繫被遺漏了，即工作介紹人與雇主或公司的關係。本文更進一步地企圖將此遺漏聯繫帶入Lin-Mouw職業同質性動員社會資本的機制中的爭論架構，且釐清相關機制。本文對職業同質性更提出新的可能機制：雙重職業同質性與新生職業同質性。第三個問題針對僅有一次就業的年輕人，企圖探索找工作時若是動員網絡資源，父母聯繫資源對於地位取得的影響？本文使用2010年的「臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫後續追蹤調查：教育與勞力市場的連結」資料，並串聯「臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」來一併探討上述提及的研究問題。本論文主要發現：（1）非主動求職在年輕勞動力市場可以得到比非正式求職者更高的社經地位。（2）在符合新生職業同質性的情況下，高地位的介紹人若是跟雇主有直接關係可以有效的提升被推薦者個人地位。然而，在符合雙重職業同質性的情況下，高地位的介紹人若是跟雇主有直接關係無法提升被推薦者個人地位。（4）對25、26歲僅有一次工作經驗者，透過高品質的父母等親屬聯繫可以比其他種聯繫找到更好的介紹人，並可再進一步透過與高地位介紹人的職業同質性提升自己的地位取得。
Research on mobilized social capital and job searching in the labor market of young adults was not abundant. This study attempts to discuss with the previous literature and proposes three research questions, which are analyzed and discussed in three chapters respectively. First of all, in the labor market of young adults, whether nonsearchers, which means people getting their jobs without the process of job searching, will attain a better status than those searching jobs through other methods? Secondly, backing to the origin of Nan Lin’s social resources theory, we find a tie between the referrer and the hiring company ignored by many studies but important. Furthermore, this study tries to bring this missing link into the debate of Lin’s and Mouw’s argument on the effect of occupational homophily in mobilized social capital framework to clarify the relevant mechanism. Besides, this study provides two new possible mechanisms of occupational homophily: double occupational homophily and newborn occupational homophily. Thirdly, for young adults with only one job experience searching jobs, how do the family resources influence young people’s status attainment? This study uses the “Taiwan Education Panel Survey and Beyond” and “Taiwan Education Panel Survey” to analyze and discuss the questions mentioned above. This study discovers: (1) Getting the job through nonsearch can bring a higher socioeconomic status than the informal job search in the young labor market. (2) In the condition of newborn occupational homophily between job seeker and job contact, job contact with the high-status and direct relation with company employer can help the referral get a better socioeconomic status. However, the condition of newborn occupational homophily, job contact with the high-status and direct relation with company employer cannot facilitate a better job. (3) For those young adults with only one job experience, they can find a higher status contact through a kinship tie than others tie, and then utilize the occupational homophily with the referrer to increase their own socioeconomic status.
參考文獻 于若蓉，(2009)。〈社會網絡與勞動市場表現：台灣資料的分析〉，《台灣社會學》18: 95-137。
張苙雲，(2011)。〈台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫(限制版)(R010001)〉【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-R010001-1。授權碼：SRDAR012019007.
關秉寅，(2016)。〈台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫後續調查：教育與勞力市場的連結(限制版)(R080001)〉【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-R080001-1。授權碼：SRDAR082019007.
Amyx, Jennifer A., (2004). Japan`s financial crisis: Institutional rigidity and reluctant change, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bentolila, Samuel, Claudio Michelacci and Javier Suarez, (2010). Social contacts and occupational choice, Economica, 77(305), 20-45.
Boxman, Ed A.W., Paul M. De Graaf and Hendrik D. Flap, (1991). The impact of social and human capital on the income attainment of Dutch managers, Social Networks, 13(1), 51-73.
Bridges, William P. and Wayne J. Villemez, (1986). Informal hiring and income in the labor market, American Sociological Review, 51(4), 574-582.
Brinton, Mary and Takehiko Kariya, (1998). Institutional embeddedness in Japanese labor markets, in Mary Brinton, and Victor Nee (Eds.), The new institutionalism in sociology (pp. 181-207), New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Burt, Ronald S., (1992). Structural holes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burt, Ronald S., (1998). The gender of social capital, Rationality and Society, 10(1), 5–46.
Chen, Yunsong and Beate Völker, (2016). Social capital and homophily both matter for labor market outcomes – evidence from replication and extension, Social Networks, 45, 18-31.
Cingano, Federico and Alfonso Rosolia, (2012). People I know: Job search and social networks, Journal of Labor Economics, 30(2), 291-332.
Coleman, James S., (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital, American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
Deming, David J., (2017). The growing importance of social skills in the labor market, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4), 1593–1640.
Deming, David J. and Lisa B. Kahn, (2017). Skill requirements across firms and labor markets: Evidence from job postings for professionals, Journal of Labor Economics, 36(S1), S337-S369.
Dustmann, Christian, Albrecht Glitz, Uta Schönberg and Herbert Brücker, (2016). Referral-based job search networks, The Review of Economic Studies, 83(2), 514-546.
Elliott, James R., (2000). Class, race, and job matching in xontemporary urban labor markets, Social Science Quarterly, 81(4), 1036-1052.
Fernandez, Roberto M., Emilio J. Castilla and Paul Moore, (2000). Social capital at work: Networks and employment at a phone center, American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1288-1356.
Fernandez, Roberto M. and Nancy Weinberg, (1997). Personal contacts and hiring in a retail bank, American Sociological Review, 62(6), 883-902.
Frome, Pamela M., Corinne J. Alfeld, Jacquelynne S. Eccles and Bonnie L. Barber, (2006). Why don`t they want a male-dominated job? An investigation of young women who changed their occupational aspirations, Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 359-372.
Granovetter, Mark S., (1974). Getting a job, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
Håkanssona, Peter and Anders Nilsson, (2018). Getting a job when times are bad: Recruitment practices in Sweden before, during and after the great recession,Scandinavian Economic History Review, Open access.
Håkanssona, Peter and Caroline Tovattb, (2017). Networks and labor market entry – a historical perspective, Labor History, 58(1), 67-90.
Hällsten, Martin, Christofer Edling and Jens Rydgren, (2017). Social capital, friendship networks, and youth unemployment, Social Science Research, 61, 234-250.
Harvey, William S., (2008). Strong or weak Ties? British and Indian expatriate scientists finding jobs in Boston, Global Networks, 8(4), 453-473.
Heckman, James J., Jora Stixrud and Sergio Urzua, (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior, Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 411-482.
Hoover‐Dempsey, Kathleen V., Joan M. T. Walker and Howard M. Sandler, (2005). Why do parents become involved? Research findings and implications, The Elementary School Journal, 106(2), 105-130.
Horvat, Erin McNamara, Elliot B. Weininger and Annette Lareau, (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks, American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 319-351.
Kahen, Vanessa, Lynn Fainsilber Katz and John M. Gottman, (1994). Linkages between parent—Child interaction and conversations of friends, Social Development, 3(3), 238-254.
Kramarz, Francis and Oskar Nordström Skans, (2014). When strong ties are strong: Networks and youth labour market entry, The Review of Economic Studies, 81(3), 1164-1200.
Lai, Gina, Nan Lin and Shu-Yin Leung, (1998). Network resources, contact resources,
and status attainment, Social Networks, 20(2),159–178.
Lareau, Annette, (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lin, Nan, (1999). Social network and status attainment, Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 467-487.
Lin, Nan, (2001). Social Capital: A theory of social structure and action, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, Nan and Dan Ao, (2008). The invisible hand of social capital: An exploratory study, in Nan Lin and Boonie Erikson (Eds.), Social capital: An international research program (pp. 107-132), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lin, Nan, Hang Young Lee and Dan Ao, (2014). Contact status and finding a job: Validation and extension, in Nan Lin, Yang-chih Fu, Chih-jou Jay Chen (Eds.), Social capital and its institutional contingency: A study of the United States, China and Taiwan (pp. 21-41), London and New York: Routledge.
Lin, Nan and Mary Dumin, (1986). Access to occupations through social ties, Social Networks, 8, 365–385.
Lin, Nan, Walter M. Ensel and John C. Vaughn, (1981). Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment, American Sociological Review, 46(4), 393-405.
Lin, Nan, Yang-chih Fu and Ray-May Hsung, (2001). The position generator: Measurement techniques for investigations of social capital, in Nan Lin, Karen Cook and Ronald S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 57-82), New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Lutter, Mark, (2015). Do women suffer from network closure? The moderating effect of social capital on gender inequality in a project-based labor market, 1929 to 2010, American Sociological Review, 80(2), 329–358.
Marin, Alexandra, (2012). Don’t mention it: Why people don’t share job information, when they do, and why it matters, Social Networks, 34(2), 181-192.
Marsden, P. V. and J. S. Hurlbert, (1988). Social resources and mobility outcomes: a replication and extension, Social Forces, 66(4), 1038~1059.
McDonald, Steve, (2005). Patterns of informal job matching across the life course: Entry‐level, reentry‐level, and elite non‐searching, Sociological Inquiry, 75(3), 403-428.
McDonald, Steve, (2015). Network effects across the earnings distribution: Payoffs to visible and invisible job finding assistance, Social Science Research, 49, 299-313.
McDonald, Steve and Glen H. Elder, (2006). When does social capital matter? Non-searching for jobs across the life course, Social Forces, 85(1), 521-549.
McDonald, Steve, Nan Lin and Dan Ao, (2009). Networks of opportunity: Gender, race, and job leads, Social Problems, 56(3), 385-402.
McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin and James M. Cook, (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks, Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
Mouw, Ted, (2003). Social capital and finding a job: Do contacts matter? American Sociological Review, 68, 868-898.
Nawata, Kazumitsu, (2004). Estimation of the female labor supply models by Heckman’s Two-step estimator and the Maximum likelihood estimator, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 64(3-4), 385-392.
Obukhova, Elena, (2012). Motivation vs. relevance: Using strong ties to find a job in urban China, Social Science Research, 41(3), 570-580.
Obukhova, Elena and George Lan, (2013). Do job seekers benefit from contacts? A direct test with contemporaneous searches, Management Science, 59(10), 2204-2216.
Pallais, Amanda and Emily Glassberg Sands, (2016). Why the referential treatment? Evidence from field experiments on referrals, Journal of Political Economy, 24(6), 1793-1828.
Seron, Carroll, Susan S. Silbey, Erin Cech and Brian Rubineau, (2015). Persistence is cultural: Professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segregation, Work and Occupations, 43(2), 178-214.
Smith, Sandra S., (2000). Mobilizing social resources: Race, ethnic, and gender differences in social capital and persisting wage inequalities, The Sociological Quarterly, 41(4), 509-537.
Smith, Sandra S., (2005). “Don’t put my name on it”: Social capital activation and job‐finding assistance among the black urban poor, American Journal of Sociology, 111(1), 1-57.
Tian, Felicia F. and Nan Lin, (2016). Weak ties, strong ties, and job mobility in urban China: 1978–2008, Social Networks, 44, 117-129.
Tian, Felicia F. and Xin Liu, (2018). Gendered double embeddedness: Finding jobs through networks in the Chinese labor market, Social Networks, 52, 28-36.
Verhaeghe, P.-P., Yaojun Li and B. Van de Putte, (2012). Socio-economic and ethnic inequalities in social capital from the damily among labour market entrants, European Sociological Review, 29(4), 683-694.
Wegener, Bernd, (1991). Job mobility and social ties: Social resources, prior job, and status attainment, American Sociological Review, 56(1), 60-71.
Yakubovich, Valery, (2005). Weak ties, information, and influence: How workers find jobs in a local Russian labor market, American Sociological Review, 70(3), 408-421.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
社會學系
106254012
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106254012
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 熊瑞梅zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Hsung, Ray-Mayen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 林昌逸zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Lin, Chang-Yien_US
dc.creator (作者) 林昌逸zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lin, Chang-Yien_US
dc.date (日期) 2019en_US
dc.date.accessioned 5-九月-2019 17:07:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 5-九月-2019 17:07:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-九月-2019 17:07:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0106254012en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125802-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 社會學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 106254012zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 過去有關年輕勞動力市場的動員社會資本與求職的研究並不是那麼豐富。本論文企圖與過去文獻對話，提出三個研究問題，並分別於三章進行分析探討。第一個問題是在年輕勞動力市場中，非主動求職者（亦即在沒有從事求職情況下獲得工作的人）相對會有較好的地位取得嗎？第二個問題回到林南社會資源理論最一開始的源頭，發現了一條在後來不受重視但卻十分重要的聯繫被遺漏了，即工作介紹人與雇主或公司的關係。本文更進一步地企圖將此遺漏聯繫帶入Lin-Mouw職業同質性動員社會資本的機制中的爭論架構，且釐清相關機制。本文對職業同質性更提出新的可能機制：雙重職業同質性與新生職業同質性。第三個問題針對僅有一次就業的年輕人，企圖探索找工作時若是動員網絡資源，父母聯繫資源對於地位取得的影響？本文使用2010年的「臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫後續追蹤調查：教育與勞力市場的連結」資料，並串聯「臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」來一併探討上述提及的研究問題。本論文主要發現：（1）非主動求職在年輕勞動力市場可以得到比非正式求職者更高的社經地位。（2）在符合新生職業同質性的情況下，高地位的介紹人若是跟雇主有直接關係可以有效的提升被推薦者個人地位。然而，在符合雙重職業同質性的情況下，高地位的介紹人若是跟雇主有直接關係無法提升被推薦者個人地位。（4）對25、26歲僅有一次工作經驗者，透過高品質的父母等親屬聯繫可以比其他種聯繫找到更好的介紹人，並可再進一步透過與高地位介紹人的職業同質性提升自己的地位取得。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Research on mobilized social capital and job searching in the labor market of young adults was not abundant. This study attempts to discuss with the previous literature and proposes three research questions, which are analyzed and discussed in three chapters respectively. First of all, in the labor market of young adults, whether nonsearchers, which means people getting their jobs without the process of job searching, will attain a better status than those searching jobs through other methods? Secondly, backing to the origin of Nan Lin’s social resources theory, we find a tie between the referrer and the hiring company ignored by many studies but important. Furthermore, this study tries to bring this missing link into the debate of Lin’s and Mouw’s argument on the effect of occupational homophily in mobilized social capital framework to clarify the relevant mechanism. Besides, this study provides two new possible mechanisms of occupational homophily: double occupational homophily and newborn occupational homophily. Thirdly, for young adults with only one job experience searching jobs, how do the family resources influence young people’s status attainment? This study uses the “Taiwan Education Panel Survey and Beyond” and “Taiwan Education Panel Survey” to analyze and discuss the questions mentioned above. This study discovers: (1) Getting the job through nonsearch can bring a higher socioeconomic status than the informal job search in the young labor market. (2) In the condition of newborn occupational homophily between job seeker and job contact, job contact with the high-status and direct relation with company employer can help the referral get a better socioeconomic status. However, the condition of newborn occupational homophily, job contact with the high-status and direct relation with company employer cannot facilitate a better job. (3) For those young adults with only one job experience, they can find a higher status contact through a kinship tie than others tie, and then utilize the occupational homophily with the referrer to increase their own socioeconomic status.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章、緒論 10
第二章、年輕勞動力市場的獲取工作管道對個人地位的影響 14
本章摘要 15
第一節、研究動機與研究目的 16
第二節、文獻回顧與研究假設 18
第三節、研究方法與步驟 22
第四節、描述性統計與T檢定分析 29
第五節、工作獲取方法對年輕人地位取得的影響 31
第六節、結論 35
第三章、職業同質性與動員社會資本機制的修訂 37
本章摘要 38
第一節、研究動機與研究目的 39
第二節、文獻回顧與研究假設 42
第三節、研究方法與步驟 54
第四節、描述性統計與T檢定分析 63
第五節、動員社會資本模型與職業同質性 67
第六節、結論 92
第四章、親屬聯繫在年輕人初入勞動力市場的影響力 95
本章摘要 96
第一節、研究動機與研究目的 97
第二節、文獻回顧與研究假設 99
第三節、研究方法與步驟 105
第四節、描述性統計與T檢定分析 113
第五節、家庭資源對於初次工作者的影響 116
第六節、結論 127
第五章、總結與討論 129
參考書目 131
附錄 137		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1927016 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106254012en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會資本zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 年輕勞動力市場zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 職業同質性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 非主動求職zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 親屬聯繫zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) social capitalen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) labor market of young adultsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) occupational homophilyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) nonsearchen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) kinship tieen_US
dc.title (題名) 年輕勞動力市場的職業同質性與動員社會資本機制：以2010 TEPS-B為例zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Occupational Homophily and the Mechanism of Mobilized Social Capital in Labour Market of Young Adults: Evidence from 2010 TEPS-B in Taiwanen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 于若蓉，(2009)。〈社會網絡與勞動市場表現：台灣資料的分析〉，《台灣社會學》18: 95-137。
張苙雲，(2011)。〈台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫(限制版)(R010001)〉【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-R010001-1。授權碼：SRDAR012019007.
關秉寅，(2016)。〈台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫後續調查：教育與勞力市場的連結(限制版)(R080001)〉【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-R080001-1。授權碼：SRDAR082019007.
Amyx, Jennifer A., (2004). Japan`s financial crisis: Institutional rigidity and reluctant change, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bentolila, Samuel, Claudio Michelacci and Javier Suarez, (2010). Social contacts and occupational choice, Economica, 77(305), 20-45.
Boxman, Ed A.W., Paul M. De Graaf and Hendrik D. Flap, (1991). The impact of social and human capital on the income attainment of Dutch managers, Social Networks, 13(1), 51-73.
Bridges, William P. and Wayne J. Villemez, (1986). Informal hiring and income in the labor market, American Sociological Review, 51(4), 574-582.
Brinton, Mary and Takehiko Kariya, (1998). Institutional embeddedness in Japanese labor markets, in Mary Brinton, and Victor Nee (Eds.), The new institutionalism in sociology (pp. 181-207), New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Burt, Ronald S., (1992). Structural holes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burt, Ronald S., (1998). The gender of social capital, Rationality and Society, 10(1), 5–46.
Chen, Yunsong and Beate Völker, (2016). Social capital and homophily both matter for labor market outcomes – evidence from replication and extension, Social Networks, 45, 18-31.
Cingano, Federico and Alfonso Rosolia, (2012). People I know: Job search and social networks, Journal of Labor Economics, 30(2), 291-332.
Coleman, James S., (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital, American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
Deming, David J., (2017). The growing importance of social skills in the labor market, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4), 1593–1640.
Deming, David J. and Lisa B. Kahn, (2017). Skill requirements across firms and labor markets: Evidence from job postings for professionals, Journal of Labor Economics, 36(S1), S337-S369.
Dustmann, Christian, Albrecht Glitz, Uta Schönberg and Herbert Brücker, (2016). Referral-based job search networks, The Review of Economic Studies, 83(2), 514-546.
Elliott, James R., (2000). Class, race, and job matching in xontemporary urban labor markets, Social Science Quarterly, 81(4), 1036-1052.
Fernandez, Roberto M., Emilio J. Castilla and Paul Moore, (2000). Social capital at work: Networks and employment at a phone center, American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1288-1356.
Fernandez, Roberto M. and Nancy Weinberg, (1997). Personal contacts and hiring in a retail bank, American Sociological Review, 62(6), 883-902.
Frome, Pamela M., Corinne J. Alfeld, Jacquelynne S. Eccles and Bonnie L. Barber, (2006). Why don`t they want a male-dominated job? An investigation of young women who changed their occupational aspirations, Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 359-372.
Granovetter, Mark S., (1974). Getting a job, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
Håkanssona, Peter and Anders Nilsson, (2018). Getting a job when times are bad: Recruitment practices in Sweden before, during and after the great recession,Scandinavian Economic History Review, Open access.
Håkanssona, Peter and Caroline Tovattb, (2017). Networks and labor market entry – a historical perspective, Labor History, 58(1), 67-90.
Hällsten, Martin, Christofer Edling and Jens Rydgren, (2017). Social capital, friendship networks, and youth unemployment, Social Science Research, 61, 234-250.
Harvey, William S., (2008). Strong or weak Ties? British and Indian expatriate scientists finding jobs in Boston, Global Networks, 8(4), 453-473.
Heckman, James J., Jora Stixrud and Sergio Urzua, (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior, Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 411-482.
Hoover‐Dempsey, Kathleen V., Joan M. T. Walker and Howard M. Sandler, (2005). Why do parents become involved? Research findings and implications, The Elementary School Journal, 106(2), 105-130.
Horvat, Erin McNamara, Elliot B. Weininger and Annette Lareau, (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks, American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 319-351.
Kahen, Vanessa, Lynn Fainsilber Katz and John M. Gottman, (1994). Linkages between parent—Child interaction and conversations of friends, Social Development, 3(3), 238-254.
Kramarz, Francis and Oskar Nordström Skans, (2014). When strong ties are strong: Networks and youth labour market entry, The Review of Economic Studies, 81(3), 1164-1200.
Lai, Gina, Nan Lin and Shu-Yin Leung, (1998). Network resources, contact resources,
and status attainment, Social Networks, 20(2),159–178.
Lareau, Annette, (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lin, Nan, (1999). Social network and status attainment, Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 467-487.
Lin, Nan, (2001). Social Capital: A theory of social structure and action, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, Nan and Dan Ao, (2008). The invisible hand of social capital: An exploratory study, in Nan Lin and Boonie Erikson (Eds.), Social capital: An international research program (pp. 107-132), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lin, Nan, Hang Young Lee and Dan Ao, (2014). Contact status and finding a job: Validation and extension, in Nan Lin, Yang-chih Fu, Chih-jou Jay Chen (Eds.), Social capital and its institutional contingency: A study of the United States, China and Taiwan (pp. 21-41), London and New York: Routledge.
Lin, Nan and Mary Dumin, (1986). Access to occupations through social ties, Social Networks, 8, 365–385.
Lin, Nan, Walter M. Ensel and John C. Vaughn, (1981). Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment, American Sociological Review, 46(4), 393-405.
Lin, Nan, Yang-chih Fu and Ray-May Hsung, (2001). The position generator: Measurement techniques for investigations of social capital, in Nan Lin, Karen Cook and Ronald S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 57-82), New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Lutter, Mark, (2015). Do women suffer from network closure? The moderating effect of social capital on gender inequality in a project-based labor market, 1929 to 2010, American Sociological Review, 80(2), 329–358.
Marin, Alexandra, (2012). Don’t mention it: Why people don’t share job information, when they do, and why it matters, Social Networks, 34(2), 181-192.
Marsden, P. V. and J. S. Hurlbert, (1988). Social resources and mobility outcomes: a replication and extension, Social Forces, 66(4), 1038~1059.
McDonald, Steve, (2005). Patterns of informal job matching across the life course: Entry‐level, reentry‐level, and elite non‐searching, Sociological Inquiry, 75(3), 403-428.
McDonald, Steve, (2015). Network effects across the earnings distribution: Payoffs to visible and invisible job finding assistance, Social Science Research, 49, 299-313.
McDonald, Steve and Glen H. Elder, (2006). When does social capital matter? Non-searching for jobs across the life course, Social Forces, 85(1), 521-549.
McDonald, Steve, Nan Lin and Dan Ao, (2009). Networks of opportunity: Gender, race, and job leads, Social Problems, 56(3), 385-402.
McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin and James M. Cook, (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks, Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
Mouw, Ted, (2003). Social capital and finding a job: Do contacts matter? American Sociological Review, 68, 868-898.
Nawata, Kazumitsu, (2004). Estimation of the female labor supply models by Heckman’s Two-step estimator and the Maximum likelihood estimator, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 64(3-4), 385-392.
Obukhova, Elena, (2012). Motivation vs. relevance: Using strong ties to find a job in urban China, Social Science Research, 41(3), 570-580.
Obukhova, Elena and George Lan, (2013). Do job seekers benefit from contacts? A direct test with contemporaneous searches, Management Science, 59(10), 2204-2216.
Pallais, Amanda and Emily Glassberg Sands, (2016). Why the referential treatment? Evidence from field experiments on referrals, Journal of Political Economy, 24(6), 1793-1828.
Seron, Carroll, Susan S. Silbey, Erin Cech and Brian Rubineau, (2015). Persistence is cultural: Professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segregation, Work and Occupations, 43(2), 178-214.
Smith, Sandra S., (2000). Mobilizing social resources: Race, ethnic, and gender differences in social capital and persisting wage inequalities, The Sociological Quarterly, 41(4), 509-537.
Smith, Sandra S., (2005). “Don’t put my name on it”: Social capital activation and job‐finding assistance among the black urban poor, American Journal of Sociology, 111(1), 1-57.
Tian, Felicia F. and Nan Lin, (2016). Weak ties, strong ties, and job mobility in urban China: 1978–2008, Social Networks, 44, 117-129.
Tian, Felicia F. and Xin Liu, (2018). Gendered double embeddedness: Finding jobs through networks in the Chinese labor market, Social Networks, 52, 28-36.
Verhaeghe, P.-P., Yaojun Li and B. Van de Putte, (2012). Socio-economic and ethnic inequalities in social capital from the damily among labour market entrants, European Sociological Review, 29(4), 683-694.
Wegener, Bernd, (1991). Job mobility and social ties: Social resources, prior job, and status attainment, American Sociological Review, 56(1), 60-71.
Yakubovich, Valery, (2005). Weak ties, information, and influence: How workers find jobs in a local Russian labor market, American Sociological Review, 70(3), 408-421.		zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU201900994en_US