學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 社會企業之商業模式與社會價值 ─以樂芽為例
Business model and social value of social enterprise ─ a case study of Tribake作者 蔡澂萱
Tsai, Cheng-Hsuan貢獻者 陳立民
Chen, Li-Ming
蔡澂萱
Tsai, Cheng-Hsuan關鍵詞 社會企業
商業模式
社會價值
Social enterprise
Business model
Social value日期 2019 上傳時間 5-九月-2019 17:34:20 (UTC+8) 摘要 社會捐助的集中化以及政府補助的短缺給部分身心障礙福利機構帶來了經費不足的問題,於是許多社福機構開始建立庇護工場和小型作業所,為機構賺取額外收入的同時也為身心障礙者提供訓練和治療,但由於缺乏相關管理能力,許多庇護工場和小型作業所在實際營運中常遭遇瓶頸,而樂芽作為一家社會企業試圖解決這個問題。本研究以樂芽為個案,將樂芽的商業模式與一家具有收入活動的非營利事業以及一家傳統營利事業進行比較,探討樂芽如何設計出不同的商業模式,使企業具備盈利能力的同時又能實現社會價值;此外本研究從供應鏈的角度探討樂芽的社會價值,樂芽在資訊流、需求面、供給面上均為合作的社福機構創造了價值;最後本研究發現樂芽目前存在產能不足、產品品質不夠穩定、參與的小作所同學不足、一般消費者需求不穩定的問題,並提出了建議。
With centralization of society donation and shortage of government subsidy, some social welfare institutions for the disabled are lacking in budget. Therefore, many welfare institutions start to establish sheltered workshops and small-scale community workshops, to earn extra budget for the institutions, and at the same time, to provide the disabled with training and treatment. However, lacking in capability of management, many sheltered workshops and small-scale community workshops face difficulties in operation. Tribake, as a social enterprise, is trying to solve this problem.The research is based on a case study of Tribake. First, the research compares the business model among a social enterprise, that is Tribake, a nonprofit institution with income-generating activity, and a traditional for-profit enterprise, to study how Tribake builds a new business model, which enables the company to make profit and achieve social value at the same time. Then, the research studies the social value that Tribake provides from the aspect of supply chain; Tribake creates value for cooperated welfare institutions from information flows, demand flows, and supply flows. Last, the research finds that Tribake is now facing some problems, such as shortage of production capability, unstable quality, the disabled not fully involved, and unstable demand from consumers, and advise for these problems are provided.參考文獻 中文文獻尤傳莉(2012)。獲利世代 : 自己動手,畫出你的商業模式(初版)(Alexander Osterwalder, Yves Pigneur)。台北市 : 早安財經文化。台灣社會企業創新創業學會策劃主編(2014)。有溫度的經營 : 社會企業主題論文集(初版)。新北市 : 社團法人台灣社會企業創新創業學會。社企流(2014)。社企力! : 社會企業=翻轉世界的變革力量.用愛創業.做好事又能獲利!(初版)。臺北市 : 果力文化,漫遊者事業股份有限公司。吳勝儒(2017)。教育系統推動身心障礙者轉銜社區日間作業設施之策略。台東特教,(46),17-21。呂朝賢(2016)。身心障礙者社區日間作業設施服務-選擇、定位與變革。東海大學社會工作學系,未出版,台中。呂葆光(2016)。農業轉型結合社會企業與公平貿易之商業模式探討-以卡維蘭為例。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。林啟南(2015)。台灣烘焙產業擴展大陸市場之成功行銷策略之研究-以龍峰烘焙食品公司為例。美和科技大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。林秀雲(2016)。社會科學研究方法(三版)(Earl Babbie)。臺北市 : 新加玻商聖智。林上祚(2018)。僧多粥少!1年27億公益彩券回饋金申請設限,社福團體憂斷炊,2019年3月11號,取自:https://www.storm.mg/article/576795?srcid=gAAAAABcq2v0R8FwwwDL_e_KVKidFvo8N24PKJ_Wzl6SoA4y8wFwkWXtabnJOIx85tCoDJNj1GfU_AVbo8aHPCMH2nqMWFsadCzD_gjS4Vd0Vihrynku10A%253D。陳偉華(2016)。台灣烘焙業的發展趨勢與經營建議,2019年2月24號,取自:https://mymkc.com/article/content/22322。陳偉華(2016)。台灣烘焙業的發展趨勢與經營建議,2019年2月24號,取自:https://mymkc.com/article/content/22322。陳貴芝(2017)。公益禮盒競爭及其延伸性議題的綜融考察,2019年3月1號,取自:https://www.sunnyswa.org.tw/16802/%E5%85%AC%E7%9B%8A%E7%A6%AE%E7%9B%92%E7%AB%B6%E7%88%AD%E5%8F%8A%E5%85%B6%E5%BB%B6%E4%BC%B8%E6%80%A7%E8%AD%B0%E9%A1%8C%E7%9A%84%E7%B6%9C%E8%9E%8D%E8%80%83%E5%AF%9F。勞動力發展創新中心(2010)。培力就業計畫。勞動部訂定計畫(勞職業字第0990510053號令),未出版。勞動部(2002)。多元就業開發方案。勞動部訂定方案(勞職業字第0910202546-1號令),未出版。黃春長、高明瑞(2016)。社會企業特性分析研究。勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生研究所103年度研究計畫(編號:ILOSH103-M312)。新北市:勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生研究所。楊祥鑫(2017)。庇護工場社會企業化探討-以喜憨兒與心路社會福利基金會為例。天主教輔仁大學,未出版,新北。楊銘賢(2009)。社會企業經營模式之構建。創業管理研究,4(4),57-83。經濟部(2014)。社會企業行動方案(103-105年)。行政院委託之具體行動方案或計畫(院臺經字第1030145295號),未出版。鄧尹菀(2015)。社會企業經營模式與成長策略之個案分析:以黑暗對話社會企業為例。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。鄭勝分(2007)。社會企業的概念分析。政策研究學報,(7),65-107。蒲孝如(2015)。小型社福機構資源缺 寒冬盼送暖,2019年3月11號,取自:https://anntw.com/articles/20150216-Xnd2。戴肇逸(2015)。新創社會企業商業模式建立之研究-以「B2O公益平台」為例。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。羅之盈(2009)。人氣賣家No.1 依蕾特布丁─專注研發,塑造商品獨特性,2018年10月12號,取自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/13219/BN-ARTICLE-13219。英文文獻Alter, K. (2007). Social enterprise typology. Virtue ventures LLC, 12, 1-124.Amit R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in E-business. Strategic management journal, 22, 493-520.Axelsson, J., Papatheocharous, E., & Andersson, J. (2014). Characteristics of software ecosystems for Federated Embedded Systems: A case study. Information and Software Technology, 56(11), 1457-1475.Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye B. L., & Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied Business Research (1st Ed.). New York: Wiley.Chell, E. (2007). Social Enterprise and Entrepreneurship: Towards a Convergent Theory of the Entrepreneurial Process. International Small Business Journal, 25 (1), 5-26.Dees, J. G., Emerson, J., & Economy, P. (2001). Enterprising nonprofits: A toolkit for social entrepreneurs (1st Ed.). New York: Wiley.Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2008). Social enterprise in Europe: recent trends and developments. European Research Network (WP no. 08/01). Bingley, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (July, 2009). Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences. Second EMES International Conference on Social Enterprise, University of Trento, Italy.Defourny, J., & Kim, S. Y. (2011). Emerging models of social enterprise in Eastern Asia: a cross‐country analysis. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(1), 86-111.Dubosson‐Torbay, M., Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2002). E‐business model design, classification, and measurements. Thunderbird International Business Review, 44(1), 5-23.Haugh H. (2006). Social Enterprise: Beyond Economic Outcomes and Individual Returns. In Mair J., Robinson J., Hockerts K. (eds) Social Entrepreneurship. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann H. (2008). Reinventing Your Business Model. Harvard business review, 86(12), 57-68.Kerlin, J. A. (2006). Social Enterprise in the United States and Europe:Understanding and Learning from the Differences. Voluntas, 17, 247-263.Kramer, M. R., & Porter, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard business review, 89(1/2), 62-77.Low, C. (2006). A framework for the governance of social enterprise. International Journal of Social Economics, 33(5/6), 376-385.Martikainen, A., Niemi, P., & Pekkanen, P. (2014). Developing a service offering for a logistical service provider—Case of local food supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 157, 318-326.Mason, C., Kirkbride, J., & Bryde, D. (2007). From stakeholders to institutions: the changing face of social enterprise governance theory. Management Decision, 45(2), 284-301.Morrisa, M., Schindehutteb, M., & Allenc, J. (2005). The entrepreneur’s business model: toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58, 726-735.Osterwalder, A. (2004). The business model ontology: A proposition in a design science approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University De Lausanne Ecole Des Hautes Etudes Commerciales, Lausanne.Richardson, J. (2008). The business model: an integrative framework for strategy execution. Strategic Change, 17(5-6), 133-214.Sodhi, M. S., & Tang, C. S. (2011). Social enterprises as supply-chain enablers for the poor. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 45, 146-153.Sodhi M. S., & Tang, C. S. (2014). Supply-chain research opportunities with the poor as suppliers or distributors in developing countries. Production and operations management, 23(9), 1483-1494.Teasdale, S. (2011). What’s in a Name? Making Sense of Social Enterprise Discourses. Public Policy and Administration, 27 (2), 99-119.Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long range planning, 43, 172-194.Thompson, J., & Doherty, B. (2006). The diverse world of social enterprise: A collection of social enterprise stories. International Journal of Social Economics, 33(5/6), 361-375.Young, D. R. (2001). Organizational Identity in Nonprofit Organizations: Strategic and Structural Implications. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 12(2), 139-157.Zolnowski, A., Weiß, C., & Böhmann, T. (January 2014). Representing Service Business Models with the Service Business Model Canvas--The Case of a Mobile Payment Service in the Retail Industry. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 718-727). IEEE.Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019-1042. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
106363008資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106363008 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 陳立民 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Li-Ming en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 蔡澂萱 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Tsai, Cheng-Hsuan en_US dc.creator (作者) 蔡澂萱 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Tsai, Cheng-Hsuan en_US dc.date (日期) 2019 en_US dc.date.accessioned 5-九月-2019 17:34:20 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 5-九月-2019 17:34:20 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-九月-2019 17:34:20 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0106363008 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125944 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 106363008 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 社會捐助的集中化以及政府補助的短缺給部分身心障礙福利機構帶來了經費不足的問題,於是許多社福機構開始建立庇護工場和小型作業所,為機構賺取額外收入的同時也為身心障礙者提供訓練和治療,但由於缺乏相關管理能力,許多庇護工場和小型作業所在實際營運中常遭遇瓶頸,而樂芽作為一家社會企業試圖解決這個問題。本研究以樂芽為個案,將樂芽的商業模式與一家具有收入活動的非營利事業以及一家傳統營利事業進行比較,探討樂芽如何設計出不同的商業模式,使企業具備盈利能力的同時又能實現社會價值;此外本研究從供應鏈的角度探討樂芽的社會價值,樂芽在資訊流、需求面、供給面上均為合作的社福機構創造了價值;最後本研究發現樂芽目前存在產能不足、產品品質不夠穩定、參與的小作所同學不足、一般消費者需求不穩定的問題,並提出了建議。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) With centralization of society donation and shortage of government subsidy, some social welfare institutions for the disabled are lacking in budget. Therefore, many welfare institutions start to establish sheltered workshops and small-scale community workshops, to earn extra budget for the institutions, and at the same time, to provide the disabled with training and treatment. However, lacking in capability of management, many sheltered workshops and small-scale community workshops face difficulties in operation. Tribake, as a social enterprise, is trying to solve this problem.The research is based on a case study of Tribake. First, the research compares the business model among a social enterprise, that is Tribake, a nonprofit institution with income-generating activity, and a traditional for-profit enterprise, to study how Tribake builds a new business model, which enables the company to make profit and achieve social value at the same time. Then, the research studies the social value that Tribake provides from the aspect of supply chain; Tribake creates value for cooperated welfare institutions from information flows, demand flows, and supply flows. Last, the research finds that Tribake is now facing some problems, such as shortage of production capability, unstable quality, the disabled not fully involved, and unstable demand from consumers, and advise for these problems are provided. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 中文摘要 I英文摘要 II謝 誌 III目 次 IV第壹章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景與動機 1第二節 研究目的與問題 9第三節 論文架構 10第貳章 文獻探討 11第一節 社會企業 11第二節 商業模式 18第參章 研究設計 20第一節 研究架構 20第二節 研究方法 21第三節 研究對象 25第四節 訪談設計 26第肆章 個案分析 28第一節 台灣烘培產業介紹 28第二節 樂芽簡介與商業模式 30第三節 心朋友工作坊簡介與商業模式 35第四節 依蕾特布丁簡介與商業模式 39第五節 三個組織之比較 43第六節 樂芽創造的社會價值 50第七節 樂芽遇到的困難 54第伍章 結論與建議 56第一節 研究結論 56第二節 研究建議 58第三節 研究限制 61參考文獻 62 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1956185 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106363008 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會企業 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 商業模式 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會價值 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social enterprise en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Business model en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social value en_US dc.title (題名) 社會企業之商業模式與社會價值 ─以樂芽為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Business model and social value of social enterprise ─ a case study of Tribake en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻尤傳莉(2012)。獲利世代 : 自己動手,畫出你的商業模式(初版)(Alexander Osterwalder, Yves Pigneur)。台北市 : 早安財經文化。台灣社會企業創新創業學會策劃主編(2014)。有溫度的經營 : 社會企業主題論文集(初版)。新北市 : 社團法人台灣社會企業創新創業學會。社企流(2014)。社企力! : 社會企業=翻轉世界的變革力量.用愛創業.做好事又能獲利!(初版)。臺北市 : 果力文化,漫遊者事業股份有限公司。吳勝儒(2017)。教育系統推動身心障礙者轉銜社區日間作業設施之策略。台東特教,(46),17-21。呂朝賢(2016)。身心障礙者社區日間作業設施服務-選擇、定位與變革。東海大學社會工作學系,未出版,台中。呂葆光(2016)。農業轉型結合社會企業與公平貿易之商業模式探討-以卡維蘭為例。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。林啟南(2015)。台灣烘焙產業擴展大陸市場之成功行銷策略之研究-以龍峰烘焙食品公司為例。美和科技大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。林秀雲(2016)。社會科學研究方法(三版)(Earl Babbie)。臺北市 : 新加玻商聖智。林上祚(2018)。僧多粥少!1年27億公益彩券回饋金申請設限,社福團體憂斷炊,2019年3月11號,取自:https://www.storm.mg/article/576795?srcid=gAAAAABcq2v0R8FwwwDL_e_KVKidFvo8N24PKJ_Wzl6SoA4y8wFwkWXtabnJOIx85tCoDJNj1GfU_AVbo8aHPCMH2nqMWFsadCzD_gjS4Vd0Vihrynku10A%253D。陳偉華(2016)。台灣烘焙業的發展趨勢與經營建議,2019年2月24號,取自:https://mymkc.com/article/content/22322。陳偉華(2016)。台灣烘焙業的發展趨勢與經營建議,2019年2月24號,取自:https://mymkc.com/article/content/22322。陳貴芝(2017)。公益禮盒競爭及其延伸性議題的綜融考察,2019年3月1號,取自:https://www.sunnyswa.org.tw/16802/%E5%85%AC%E7%9B%8A%E7%A6%AE%E7%9B%92%E7%AB%B6%E7%88%AD%E5%8F%8A%E5%85%B6%E5%BB%B6%E4%BC%B8%E6%80%A7%E8%AD%B0%E9%A1%8C%E7%9A%84%E7%B6%9C%E8%9E%8D%E8%80%83%E5%AF%9F。勞動力發展創新中心(2010)。培力就業計畫。勞動部訂定計畫(勞職業字第0990510053號令),未出版。勞動部(2002)。多元就業開發方案。勞動部訂定方案(勞職業字第0910202546-1號令),未出版。黃春長、高明瑞(2016)。社會企業特性分析研究。勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生研究所103年度研究計畫(編號:ILOSH103-M312)。新北市:勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生研究所。楊祥鑫(2017)。庇護工場社會企業化探討-以喜憨兒與心路社會福利基金會為例。天主教輔仁大學,未出版,新北。楊銘賢(2009)。社會企業經營模式之構建。創業管理研究,4(4),57-83。經濟部(2014)。社會企業行動方案(103-105年)。行政院委託之具體行動方案或計畫(院臺經字第1030145295號),未出版。鄧尹菀(2015)。社會企業經營模式與成長策略之個案分析:以黑暗對話社會企業為例。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。鄭勝分(2007)。社會企業的概念分析。政策研究學報,(7),65-107。蒲孝如(2015)。小型社福機構資源缺 寒冬盼送暖,2019年3月11號,取自:https://anntw.com/articles/20150216-Xnd2。戴肇逸(2015)。新創社會企業商業模式建立之研究-以「B2O公益平台」為例。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。羅之盈(2009)。人氣賣家No.1 依蕾特布丁─專注研發,塑造商品獨特性,2018年10月12號,取自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/13219/BN-ARTICLE-13219。英文文獻Alter, K. (2007). Social enterprise typology. Virtue ventures LLC, 12, 1-124.Amit R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in E-business. Strategic management journal, 22, 493-520.Axelsson, J., Papatheocharous, E., & Andersson, J. (2014). Characteristics of software ecosystems for Federated Embedded Systems: A case study. Information and Software Technology, 56(11), 1457-1475.Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye B. L., & Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied Business Research (1st Ed.). New York: Wiley.Chell, E. (2007). Social Enterprise and Entrepreneurship: Towards a Convergent Theory of the Entrepreneurial Process. International Small Business Journal, 25 (1), 5-26.Dees, J. G., Emerson, J., & Economy, P. (2001). Enterprising nonprofits: A toolkit for social entrepreneurs (1st Ed.). New York: Wiley.Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2008). Social enterprise in Europe: recent trends and developments. European Research Network (WP no. 08/01). Bingley, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (July, 2009). Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences. Second EMES International Conference on Social Enterprise, University of Trento, Italy.Defourny, J., & Kim, S. Y. (2011). Emerging models of social enterprise in Eastern Asia: a cross‐country analysis. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(1), 86-111.Dubosson‐Torbay, M., Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2002). E‐business model design, classification, and measurements. Thunderbird International Business Review, 44(1), 5-23.Haugh H. (2006). Social Enterprise: Beyond Economic Outcomes and Individual Returns. In Mair J., Robinson J., Hockerts K. (eds) Social Entrepreneurship. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann H. (2008). Reinventing Your Business Model. Harvard business review, 86(12), 57-68.Kerlin, J. A. (2006). Social Enterprise in the United States and Europe:Understanding and Learning from the Differences. Voluntas, 17, 247-263.Kramer, M. R., & Porter, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard business review, 89(1/2), 62-77.Low, C. (2006). A framework for the governance of social enterprise. International Journal of Social Economics, 33(5/6), 376-385.Martikainen, A., Niemi, P., & Pekkanen, P. (2014). Developing a service offering for a logistical service provider—Case of local food supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 157, 318-326.Mason, C., Kirkbride, J., & Bryde, D. (2007). From stakeholders to institutions: the changing face of social enterprise governance theory. Management Decision, 45(2), 284-301.Morrisa, M., Schindehutteb, M., & Allenc, J. (2005). The entrepreneur’s business model: toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58, 726-735.Osterwalder, A. (2004). The business model ontology: A proposition in a design science approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University De Lausanne Ecole Des Hautes Etudes Commerciales, Lausanne.Richardson, J. (2008). The business model: an integrative framework for strategy execution. Strategic Change, 17(5-6), 133-214.Sodhi, M. S., & Tang, C. S. (2011). Social enterprises as supply-chain enablers for the poor. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 45, 146-153.Sodhi M. S., & Tang, C. S. (2014). Supply-chain research opportunities with the poor as suppliers or distributors in developing countries. Production and operations management, 23(9), 1483-1494.Teasdale, S. (2011). What’s in a Name? Making Sense of Social Enterprise Discourses. Public Policy and Administration, 27 (2), 99-119.Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long range planning, 43, 172-194.Thompson, J., & Doherty, B. (2006). The diverse world of social enterprise: A collection of social enterprise stories. International Journal of Social Economics, 33(5/6), 361-375.Young, D. R. (2001). Organizational Identity in Nonprofit Organizations: Strategic and Structural Implications. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 12(2), 139-157.Zolnowski, A., Weiß, C., & Böhmann, T. (January 2014). Representing Service Business Models with the Service Business Model Canvas--The Case of a Mobile Payment Service in the Retail Industry. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 718-727). IEEE.Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019-1042. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU201900690 en_US