1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 資訊學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 以深度動態卷積神經網路實施多重任務學習偵測假新聞
Deep Dynamic Convolutional Neural Network with Multi-Task Learning for Fake News Detection
作者 林佑駿
Lin, Yu-Chun
貢獻者 胡毓忠
Hu, Yuh-Jong
林佑駿
Lin, Yu-Chun
關鍵詞 假新聞
深度學習
社群媒體
動態卷積神經網路
多重任務學習
Fake News
Detection
Deep Learning
Social Media
Dynamic CNN
Multi-Task Learning
日期 2020
上傳時間 2-三月-2020 11:38:27 (UTC+8)
摘要 傳統的假新聞偵測主要區分為知識庫比對、專家人工辨識與特徵機器學習等3大方式，但是隨著資料數據的日益龐大、新聞來源的多樣化以及惡意變造新聞的手法推層出新，傳統假新聞偵測方法已出現瓶頸，逐漸不敷現況使用，為了突破此一困境，於是出現以深度學習找尋未知特徵的偵測方式。
以往深度學習受限於硬體效能，不易針對模型的調整與優化進行全方位驗測，所幸隨著科技進步與莫爾定律推演，硬體效能持續以指數性程度成長，進而使深度學習的研究邁向了全新領域。
本論文除了研究如何以深度學習中的深度動態卷積神經網路進行假新聞偵
測外，同時也探討超參數在深度學習中對於優化的影響及資料集特徵在模型中所扮演的角色。運用多重任務學習框架，將推文立場、假新聞偵測與假新聞驗證等3個任務相互搭配，分析各任務彼此之間的關連影響。另針對深度動態卷積神經網路在處理假新聞偵測應用問題上的特性進行分析。
Traditional fake news detection is mainly divided into three major methods, knowledge based comparison, expert manual identification, and feature machine learning. With the increasing data, the diversification of news sources, and the malicious method of altering news, the traditional methods of detecting fake news has become a bottleneck, and it is gradually inadequate to use it. To break through this dilemma, there is a detection method that uses deep learning to find unknown features.
In the past, deep learning was limited by hardware performance, and it was not easy to conduct comprehensive testing for model adjustment and optimization.
Fortunately, with the advancement of science and technology and Moore`s Law, hardware performance continued to grow exponentially, deep learning towards a whole new field.
In addition to studying how to detect fake news with deep dynamic convolutional neural networks in deep learning, this paper also explores the impact of
hyperparameters on deep learning optimization and the role of data set features in the model. Besides, a multi-task learning framework is used to match three tasks, such as tweet position, fake news detection, and fake news verification, to analyze the impact of each task on each other. It also analyzes the characteristics of the deep dynamic convolutional neural network in dealing with the application of fake news detection.
參考文獻 [1] N. Kalchbrenner, E. Grefenstette, and P. Blunsom, "A convolutional neural
network for modelling sentences," arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.2188, 2014.
[2] Z. Tufekci, "It’s the (democracy-poisoning) Golden Age of free speech,"
WIRED. Accessed May, vol. 20, p. 2018, 2018.
[3] E. Hunt, "What is fake news? How to spot it and what you can do to stop it,"
The Guardian, vol. 17, 2016.
[4] K. Shu, A. Sliva, S. Wang, J. Tang, and H. Liu, "Fake news detection on
social media: A data mining perspective," ACM SIGKDD Explorations
Newsletter, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 22-36, 2017.
[5] V. Rubin, N. Conroy, Y. Chen, and S. Cornwell, "Fake news or truth? using
satirical cues to detect potentially misleading news," in Proceedings of the
second workshop on computational approaches to deception detection, 2016,
pp. 7-17.
[6] M. Balmas, "When fake news becomes real: Combined exposure to multiple
news sources and political attitudes of inefficacy, alienation, and cynicism,"
Communication Research, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 430-454, 2014.
[7] E. Ferrara, O. Varol, C. Davis, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini, "The rise of
social bots," Communications of the ACM, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 96-104, 2016.
[8] J. Cheng, M. Bernstein, C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and J. Leskovec,
"Anyone can become a troll: Causes of trolling behavior in online
discussions," in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer
supported cooperative work and social computing, 2017: ACM, pp. 1217-
1230.
[9] Z. Chu, S. Gianvecchio, H. Wang, and S. Jajodia, "Detecting automation of
twitter accounts: Are you a human, bot, or cyborg?," IEEE Transactions on
Dependable and Secure Computing, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 811-824, 2012.
[10] M. Del Vicario et al., "Echo chambers: Emotional contagion and group
polarization on facebook," Scientific reports, vol. 6, p. 37825, 2016.
[11] W. Quattrociocchi, A. Scala, and C. R. Sunstein, "Echo chambers on
Facebook," Available at SSRN 2795110, 2016.
[12] C. Paul and M. Matthews, "The Russian “firehose of falsehood” propaganda
model," Rand Corporation, pp. 2-7, 2016.
[13] Y. Chen, N. J. Conroy, and V. L. Rubin, "Misleading online content:
Recognizing clickbait as false news," in Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on
Workshop on Multimodal Deception Detection, 2015: ACM, pp. 15-19.
[14] J. Fürnkranz, "A study using n-gram features for text categorization," Austrian
Research Institute for Artifical Intelligence, vol. 3, no. 1998, pp. 1-10, 1998.
[15] M. Potthast, J. Kiesel, K. Reinartz, J. Bevendorff, and B. Stein, "A stylometric
inquiry into hyperpartisan and fake news," arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.05638,
2017.
[16] S. Afroz, M. Brennan, and R. Greenstadt, "Detecting hoaxes, frauds, and
deception in writing style online," in 2012 IEEE Symposium on Security and
Privacy, 2012: IEEE, pp. 461-475.
[17] C. Castillo, M. Mendoza, and B. Poblete, "Information credibility on twitter,"
in Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web, 2011:
ACM, pp. 675-684.
[18] F. Yang, Y. Liu, X. Yu, and M. Yang, "Automatic detection of rumor on
Sina Weibo," in Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Mining Data
Semantics, 2012: ACM, p. 13.
[19] J. Ma, W. Gao, Z. Wei, Y. Lu, and K.-F. Wong, "Detect rumors using time
series of social context information on microblogging websites," in
Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and
Knowledge Management, 2015: ACM, pp. 1751-1754.
[20] S. Kwon, M. Cha, K. Jung, W. Chen, and Y. Wang, "Prominent features of
rumor propagation in online social media," in 2013 IEEE 13th International
Conference on Data Mining, 2013: IEEE, pp. 1103-1108.
[21] N. Ruchansky, S. Seo, and Y. Liu, "Csi: A hybrid deep model for fake news
detection," in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information
and Knowledge Management, 2017: ACM, pp. 797-806.
[22] Z. Jin, J. Cao, Y. Zhang, and J. Luo, "News verification by exploiting
conflicting social viewpoints in microblogs," in Thirtieth AAAI Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, 2016.
[23] J. Ma et al., "Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural
networks," in Ijcai, 2016, pp. 3818-3824.
[24] E. Tacchini, G. Ballarin, M. L. Della Vedova, S. Moret, and L. de Alfaro,
"Some like it hoax: Automated fake news detection in social networks," arXiv
preprint arXiv:1704.07506, 2017.
[25] A. Zubiaga, A. Aker, K. Bontcheva, M. Liakata, and R. Procter, "Detection
and resolution of rumours in social media: A survey," ACM Computing
Surveys (CSUR), vol. 51, no. 2, p. 32, 2018.
[26] A. Vlachos and S. Riedel, "Fact checking: Task definition and dataset
construction," in Proceedings of the ACL 2014 Workshop on Language
Technologies and Computational Social Science, 2014, pp. 18-22.
[27] N. Hassan, C. Li, and M. Tremayne, "Detecting check-worthy factual claims
in presidential debates," in Proceedings of the 24th acm international on
conference on information and knowledge management, 2015: ACM, pp.
1835-1838.
[28] M. Banko, M. J. Cafarella, S. Soderland, M. Broadhead, and O. Etzioni,
"Open information extraction from the web," in Ijcai, 2007, vol. 7, pp. 2670-
2676.
[29] A. Magdy and N. Wanas, "Web-based statistical fact checking of textual
documents," in Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Search and
mining user-generated contents, 2010: ACM, pp. 103-110.
[30] Y. Wu, P. K. Agarwal, C. Li, J. Yang, and C. Yu, "Toward computational
fact-checking," Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 589-
600, 2014.
[31] G. L. Ciampaglia, P. Shiralkar, L. M. Rocha, J. Bollen, F. Menczer, and A.
Flammini, "Computational fact checking from knowledge networks," PloS
one, vol. 10, no. 6, p. e0128193, 2015.
[32] B. Shi and T. Weninger, "Fact checking in heterogeneous information
networks," in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion
on World Wide Web, 2016: International World Wide Web Conferences
Steering Committee, pp. 101-102.
[33] Z. Zhao, P. Resnick, and Q. Mei, "Enquiring minds: Early detection of
rumors in social media from enquiry posts," in Proceedings of the 24th
International Conference on World Wide Web, 2015: International World
Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, pp. 1395-1405.
[34] A. Zubiaga, M. Liakata, and R. Procter, "Exploiting context for rumour
detection in social media," in International Conference on Social Informatics,
2017: Springer, pp. 109-123.
[35] S. Kwon, M. Cha, and K. Jung, "Rumor detection over varying time
windows," PloS one, vol. 12, no. 1, p. e0168344, 2017.
[36] T. Chen, X. Li, H. Yin, and J. Zhang, "Call attention to rumors: Deep
attention based recurrent neural networks for early rumor detection," in Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2018:
Springer, pp. 40-52.
[37] M. Mendoza, B. Poblete, and C. Castillo, "Twitter under crisis: Can we trust
what we RT?," in Proceedings of the first workshop on social media analytics,
2010: ACM, pp. 71-79.
[38] R. Procter, F. Vis, and A. Voss, "Reading the riots on Twitter: methodological
innovation for the analysis of big data," International journal of social
research methodology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 197-214, 2013.
[39] L. Derczynski et al., "PHEME: Computing Veracity—the Fourth Challenge
of Big Social Data," in Proceedings of the Extended Semantic Web
Conference EU Project Networking session (ESCW-PN), 2015.
[40] M. Lukasik, P. Srijith, D. Vu, K. Bontcheva, A. Zubiaga, and T. Cohn,
"Hawkes processes for continuous time sequence classification: an application
to rumour stance classification in twitter," in Proceedings of the 54th Annual
Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short
Papers), 2016, vol. 2, pp. 393-398.
[41] A. Zubiaga et al., "Discourse-aware rumour stance classification in social
media using sequential classifiers," Information Processing & Management,
vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 273-290, 2018.
[42] W. Y. Wang, "" liar, liar pants on fire": A new benchmark dataset for fake
news detection," arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.00648, 2017.
[43] G. Giasemidis et al., "Determining the veracity of rumours on Twitter," in
International Conference on Social Informatics, 2016: Springer, pp. 185-205.
[44] C. Boididou, S. Papadopoulos, Y. Kompatsiaris, S. Schifferes, and N.
Newman, "Challenges of computational verification in social multimedia," in
Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, 2014:
ACM, pp. 743-748.
[45] C. Boididou, S. Papadopoulos, L. Apostolidis, and Y. Kompatsiaris,
"Learning to detect misleading content on twitter," in Proceedings of the 2017
ACM on International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval, 2017: ACM, pp.
278-286.
[46] O. Russakovsky et al., "Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge,"
International journal of computer vision, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 211-252, 2015.
[47] Y. Kim, "Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification," arXiv
preprint arXiv:1408.5882, 2014.
[48] I. Solaiman et al., "Release strategies and the social impacts of language
models," arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.09203, 2019
[49] J. Baxter, "A Bayesian/information theoretic model of learning to learn via
multiple task sampling," Machine learning, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 7-39, 1997.
[50] R. Collobert and J. Weston, "A unified architecture for natural language
processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning," in Proceedings of
the 25th international conference on Machine learning, 2008: ACM, pp. 160-
167.
[51] L. Derczynski, K. Bontcheva, M. Liakata, R. Procter, G. W. S. Hoi, and A.
Zubiaga, "SemEval-2017 Task 8: RumourEval: Determining rumour veracity
and support for rumours," arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.05972, 2017.
[52] R. Caruana, "Multitask learning: A knowledge-based source of inductive bias.
Machine Learning," 1997.
[53] S. Ruder, "An overview of multi-task learning in deep neural networks," arXiv
preprint arXiv:1706.05098, 2017.
[54] E. Kochkina, M. Liakata, and A. Zubiaga, "All-in-one: Multi-task learning for
rumour verification," arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03713, 2018.
[55] O. Enayet and S. R. El-Beltagy, "NileTMRG at SemEval-2017 Task 8:
Determining Rumour and Veracity Support for Rumours on Twitter," in
Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation
(SemEval-2017), 2017, pp. 470-474.
[56] A. Zubiaga, M. Liakata, R. Procter, G. W. S. Hoi, and P. Tolmie, "Analysing
how people orient to and spread rumours in social media by looking at
conversational threads," PloS one, vol. 11, no. 3, p. e0150989, 2016.
[57] E. Kochkina, M. Liakata, and I. Augenstein, "Turing at semeval-2017 task 8:
Sequential approach to rumour stance classification with branch-lstm," arXiv
preprint arXiv:1704.07221, 2017.
[58] T. Mikolov, K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean, "Efficient estimation of word
representations in vector space," arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781, 2013.
[59] D. Britz, "Understanding convolutional neural networks for NLP," URL:
http://www. wildml. com/2015/11/understanding-convolutionalneuralnetworks-for-nlp/(visited on 11/07/2015), 2015.
[60] T. Perry, "Convolutional methods for text," ed: Medium, 2017.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
資訊科學系碩士在職專班
106971004
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106971004
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 胡毓忠zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Hu, Yuh-Jongen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 林佑駿zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Lin, Yu-Chunen_US
dc.creator (作者) 林佑駿zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lin, Yu-Chunen_US
dc.date (日期) 2020en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2-三月-2020 11:38:27 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-三月-2020 11:38:27 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-三月-2020 11:38:27 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0106971004en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/128993-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 資訊科學系碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 106971004zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 傳統的假新聞偵測主要區分為知識庫比對、專家人工辨識與特徵機器學習等3大方式，但是隨著資料數據的日益龐大、新聞來源的多樣化以及惡意變造新聞的手法推層出新，傳統假新聞偵測方法已出現瓶頸，逐漸不敷現況使用，為了突破此一困境，於是出現以深度學習找尋未知特徵的偵測方式。
以往深度學習受限於硬體效能，不易針對模型的調整與優化進行全方位驗測，所幸隨著科技進步與莫爾定律推演，硬體效能持續以指數性程度成長，進而使深度學習的研究邁向了全新領域。
本論文除了研究如何以深度學習中的深度動態卷積神經網路進行假新聞偵
測外，同時也探討超參數在深度學習中對於優化的影響及資料集特徵在模型中所扮演的角色。運用多重任務學習框架，將推文立場、假新聞偵測與假新聞驗證等3個任務相互搭配，分析各任務彼此之間的關連影響。另針對深度動態卷積神經網路在處理假新聞偵測應用問題上的特性進行分析。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Traditional fake news detection is mainly divided into three major methods, knowledge based comparison, expert manual identification, and feature machine learning. With the increasing data, the diversification of news sources, and the malicious method of altering news, the traditional methods of detecting fake news has become a bottleneck, and it is gradually inadequate to use it. To break through this dilemma, there is a detection method that uses deep learning to find unknown features.
In the past, deep learning was limited by hardware performance, and it was not easy to conduct comprehensive testing for model adjustment and optimization.
Fortunately, with the advancement of science and technology and Moore`s Law, hardware performance continued to grow exponentially, deep learning towards a whole new field.
In addition to studying how to detect fake news with deep dynamic convolutional neural networks in deep learning, this paper also explores the impact of
hyperparameters on deep learning optimization and the role of data set features in the model. Besides, a multi-task learning framework is used to match three tasks, such as tweet position, fake news detection, and fake news verification, to analyze the impact of each task on each other. It also analyzes the characteristics of the deep dynamic convolutional neural network in dealing with the application of fake news detection.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目錄
摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vii
圖目錄 viii
第一章 導論 1
1.1 研究動機 1
1.2 研究目的 3
1.3 研究貢獻 4
第二章 研究背景 6
2.1 假新聞定義 6
2.1.1 社群媒體中的假新聞 7
2.2 假新聞特徵 8
2.2.1 社群媒體假新聞特徵 10
2.3 假新聞分類方法 12
2.3.1 假新聞偵測 14
2.3.2 推文立場 14
2.3.3 假新聞驗證 15
2.4 卷積神經網路 16
2.4.1 卷積神經網路應用於文本分類 17
2.4.2 動態卷積神經網路 18
2.5 自然語言處理 20
2.6 多重任務學習 22
第三章 相關研究 27
3.1 假新聞分類相關研究 27
第四章 研究方法與架構 28
4.1 假新聞資料集 29
4.1.1 PHEME 資料集 30
4.1.2 RumourEval 資料集 32
4.1.3 資料前處理 34
4.2 模型驗證 34
4.3 動態卷積網路建模 36
4.4 多重任務學習 36
第五章 研究實作與結果 38
5.1 實驗環境 38
5.2 實做過程 39
5.3 實驗結果 40
5.3.1 多任務深度動態卷積網路學習 40
5.3.2 各類模型比較 46
5.4 分析研討 48
5.4.1 資料集規模 48
5.4.2 動態池化參數 49
5.4.3 多重任務學習 49
5.4.4 深度動態卷積神經網路模型特色 50
第六章 結論與未來展望 52
6.1 研究結論 52
6.2 未來展望 53
參考文獻 55		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1858156 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106971004en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 假新聞zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 深度學習zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社群媒體zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 動態卷積神經網路zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 多重任務學習zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Fake Newsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Detectionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Deep Learningen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social Mediaen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Dynamic CNNen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Multi-Task Learningen_US
dc.title (題名) 以深度動態卷積神經網路實施多重任務學習偵測假新聞zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Deep Dynamic Convolutional Neural Network with Multi-Task Learning for Fake News Detectionen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [1] N. Kalchbrenner, E. Grefenstette, and P. Blunsom, "A convolutional neural
network for modelling sentences," arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.2188, 2014.
[2] Z. Tufekci, "It’s the (democracy-poisoning) Golden Age of free speech,"
WIRED. Accessed May, vol. 20, p. 2018, 2018.
[3] E. Hunt, "What is fake news? How to spot it and what you can do to stop it,"
The Guardian, vol. 17, 2016.
[4] K. Shu, A. Sliva, S. Wang, J. Tang, and H. Liu, "Fake news detection on
social media: A data mining perspective," ACM SIGKDD Explorations
Newsletter, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 22-36, 2017.
[5] V. Rubin, N. Conroy, Y. Chen, and S. Cornwell, "Fake news or truth? using
satirical cues to detect potentially misleading news," in Proceedings of the
second workshop on computational approaches to deception detection, 2016,
pp. 7-17.
[6] M. Balmas, "When fake news becomes real: Combined exposure to multiple
news sources and political attitudes of inefficacy, alienation, and cynicism,"
Communication Research, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 430-454, 2014.
[7] E. Ferrara, O. Varol, C. Davis, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini, "The rise of
social bots," Communications of the ACM, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 96-104, 2016.
[8] J. Cheng, M. Bernstein, C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and J. Leskovec,
"Anyone can become a troll: Causes of trolling behavior in online
discussions," in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer
supported cooperative work and social computing, 2017: ACM, pp. 1217-
1230.
[9] Z. Chu, S. Gianvecchio, H. Wang, and S. Jajodia, "Detecting automation of
twitter accounts: Are you a human, bot, or cyborg?," IEEE Transactions on
Dependable and Secure Computing, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 811-824, 2012.
[10] M. Del Vicario et al., "Echo chambers: Emotional contagion and group
polarization on facebook," Scientific reports, vol. 6, p. 37825, 2016.
[11] W. Quattrociocchi, A. Scala, and C. R. Sunstein, "Echo chambers on
Facebook," Available at SSRN 2795110, 2016.
[12] C. Paul and M. Matthews, "The Russian “firehose of falsehood” propaganda
model," Rand Corporation, pp. 2-7, 2016.
[13] Y. Chen, N. J. Conroy, and V. L. Rubin, "Misleading online content:
Recognizing clickbait as false news," in Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on
Workshop on Multimodal Deception Detection, 2015: ACM, pp. 15-19.
[14] J. Fürnkranz, "A study using n-gram features for text categorization," Austrian
Research Institute for Artifical Intelligence, vol. 3, no. 1998, pp. 1-10, 1998.
[15] M. Potthast, J. Kiesel, K. Reinartz, J. Bevendorff, and B. Stein, "A stylometric
inquiry into hyperpartisan and fake news," arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.05638,
2017.
[16] S. Afroz, M. Brennan, and R. Greenstadt, "Detecting hoaxes, frauds, and
deception in writing style online," in 2012 IEEE Symposium on Security and
Privacy, 2012: IEEE, pp. 461-475.
[17] C. Castillo, M. Mendoza, and B. Poblete, "Information credibility on twitter,"
in Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web, 2011:
ACM, pp. 675-684.
[18] F. Yang, Y. Liu, X. Yu, and M. Yang, "Automatic detection of rumor on
Sina Weibo," in Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Mining Data
Semantics, 2012: ACM, p. 13.
[19] J. Ma, W. Gao, Z. Wei, Y. Lu, and K.-F. Wong, "Detect rumors using time
series of social context information on microblogging websites," in
Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and
Knowledge Management, 2015: ACM, pp. 1751-1754.
[20] S. Kwon, M. Cha, K. Jung, W. Chen, and Y. Wang, "Prominent features of
rumor propagation in online social media," in 2013 IEEE 13th International
Conference on Data Mining, 2013: IEEE, pp. 1103-1108.
[21] N. Ruchansky, S. Seo, and Y. Liu, "Csi: A hybrid deep model for fake news
detection," in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information
and Knowledge Management, 2017: ACM, pp. 797-806.
[22] Z. Jin, J. Cao, Y. Zhang, and J. Luo, "News verification by exploiting
conflicting social viewpoints in microblogs," in Thirtieth AAAI Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, 2016.
[23] J. Ma et al., "Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural
networks," in Ijcai, 2016, pp. 3818-3824.
[24] E. Tacchini, G. Ballarin, M. L. Della Vedova, S. Moret, and L. de Alfaro,
"Some like it hoax: Automated fake news detection in social networks," arXiv
preprint arXiv:1704.07506, 2017.
[25] A. Zubiaga, A. Aker, K. Bontcheva, M. Liakata, and R. Procter, "Detection
and resolution of rumours in social media: A survey," ACM Computing
Surveys (CSUR), vol. 51, no. 2, p. 32, 2018.
[26] A. Vlachos and S. Riedel, "Fact checking: Task definition and dataset
construction," in Proceedings of the ACL 2014 Workshop on Language
Technologies and Computational Social Science, 2014, pp. 18-22.
[27] N. Hassan, C. Li, and M. Tremayne, "Detecting check-worthy factual claims
in presidential debates," in Proceedings of the 24th acm international on
conference on information and knowledge management, 2015: ACM, pp.
1835-1838.
[28] M. Banko, M. J. Cafarella, S. Soderland, M. Broadhead, and O. Etzioni,
"Open information extraction from the web," in Ijcai, 2007, vol. 7, pp. 2670-
2676.
[29] A. Magdy and N. Wanas, "Web-based statistical fact checking of textual
documents," in Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Search and
mining user-generated contents, 2010: ACM, pp. 103-110.
[30] Y. Wu, P. K. Agarwal, C. Li, J. Yang, and C. Yu, "Toward computational
fact-checking," Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 589-
600, 2014.
[31] G. L. Ciampaglia, P. Shiralkar, L. M. Rocha, J. Bollen, F. Menczer, and A.
Flammini, "Computational fact checking from knowledge networks," PloS
one, vol. 10, no. 6, p. e0128193, 2015.
[32] B. Shi and T. Weninger, "Fact checking in heterogeneous information
networks," in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion
on World Wide Web, 2016: International World Wide Web Conferences
Steering Committee, pp. 101-102.
[33] Z. Zhao, P. Resnick, and Q. Mei, "Enquiring minds: Early detection of
rumors in social media from enquiry posts," in Proceedings of the 24th
International Conference on World Wide Web, 2015: International World
Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, pp. 1395-1405.
[34] A. Zubiaga, M. Liakata, and R. Procter, "Exploiting context for rumour
detection in social media," in International Conference on Social Informatics,
2017: Springer, pp. 109-123.
[35] S. Kwon, M. Cha, and K. Jung, "Rumor detection over varying time
windows," PloS one, vol. 12, no. 1, p. e0168344, 2017.
[36] T. Chen, X. Li, H. Yin, and J. Zhang, "Call attention to rumors: Deep
attention based recurrent neural networks for early rumor detection," in Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2018:
Springer, pp. 40-52.
[37] M. Mendoza, B. Poblete, and C. Castillo, "Twitter under crisis: Can we trust
what we RT?," in Proceedings of the first workshop on social media analytics,
2010: ACM, pp. 71-79.
[38] R. Procter, F. Vis, and A. Voss, "Reading the riots on Twitter: methodological
innovation for the analysis of big data," International journal of social
research methodology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 197-214, 2013.
[39] L. Derczynski et al., "PHEME: Computing Veracity—the Fourth Challenge
of Big Social Data," in Proceedings of the Extended Semantic Web
Conference EU Project Networking session (ESCW-PN), 2015.
[40] M. Lukasik, P. Srijith, D. Vu, K. Bontcheva, A. Zubiaga, and T. Cohn,
"Hawkes processes for continuous time sequence classification: an application
to rumour stance classification in twitter," in Proceedings of the 54th Annual
Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short
Papers), 2016, vol. 2, pp. 393-398.
[41] A. Zubiaga et al., "Discourse-aware rumour stance classification in social
media using sequential classifiers," Information Processing & Management,
vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 273-290, 2018.
[42] W. Y. Wang, "" liar, liar pants on fire": A new benchmark dataset for fake
news detection," arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.00648, 2017.
[43] G. Giasemidis et al., "Determining the veracity of rumours on Twitter," in
International Conference on Social Informatics, 2016: Springer, pp. 185-205.
[44] C. Boididou, S. Papadopoulos, Y. Kompatsiaris, S. Schifferes, and N.
Newman, "Challenges of computational verification in social multimedia," in
Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, 2014:
ACM, pp. 743-748.
[45] C. Boididou, S. Papadopoulos, L. Apostolidis, and Y. Kompatsiaris,
"Learning to detect misleading content on twitter," in Proceedings of the 2017
ACM on International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval, 2017: ACM, pp.
278-286.
[46] O. Russakovsky et al., "Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge,"
International journal of computer vision, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 211-252, 2015.
[47] Y. Kim, "Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification," arXiv
preprint arXiv:1408.5882, 2014.
[48] I. Solaiman et al., "Release strategies and the social impacts of language
models," arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.09203, 2019
[49] J. Baxter, "A Bayesian/information theoretic model of learning to learn via
multiple task sampling," Machine learning, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 7-39, 1997.
[50] R. Collobert and J. Weston, "A unified architecture for natural language
processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning," in Proceedings of
the 25th international conference on Machine learning, 2008: ACM, pp. 160-
167.
[51] L. Derczynski, K. Bontcheva, M. Liakata, R. Procter, G. W. S. Hoi, and A.
Zubiaga, "SemEval-2017 Task 8: RumourEval: Determining rumour veracity
and support for rumours," arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.05972, 2017.
[52] R. Caruana, "Multitask learning: A knowledge-based source of inductive bias.
Machine Learning," 1997.
[53] S. Ruder, "An overview of multi-task learning in deep neural networks," arXiv
preprint arXiv:1706.05098, 2017.
[54] E. Kochkina, M. Liakata, and A. Zubiaga, "All-in-one: Multi-task learning for
rumour verification," arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03713, 2018.
[55] O. Enayet and S. R. El-Beltagy, "NileTMRG at SemEval-2017 Task 8:
Determining Rumour and Veracity Support for Rumours on Twitter," in
Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation
(SemEval-2017), 2017, pp. 470-474.
[56] A. Zubiaga, M. Liakata, R. Procter, G. W. S. Hoi, and P. Tolmie, "Analysing
how people orient to and spread rumours in social media by looking at
conversational threads," PloS one, vol. 11, no. 3, p. e0150989, 2016.
[57] E. Kochkina, M. Liakata, and I. Augenstein, "Turing at semeval-2017 task 8:
Sequential approach to rumour stance classification with branch-lstm," arXiv
preprint arXiv:1704.07221, 2017.
[58] T. Mikolov, K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean, "Efficient estimation of word
representations in vector space," arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781, 2013.
[59] D. Britz, "Understanding convolutional neural networks for NLP," URL:
http://www. wildml. com/2015/11/understanding-convolutionalneuralnetworks-for-nlp/(visited on 11/07/2015), 2015.
[60] T. Perry, "Convolutional methods for text," ed: Medium, 2017.		zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202000234en_US