學術產出-期刊論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 飄移在兩種司法理念間的司法改革－台灣司法改革的社經背景與法制基礎 作者 蘇永欽 貢獻者 法律系 關鍵詞 法制基礎;司法問題;違憲審查;訴訟程序;行政法院;審判獨立;憲法解釋;實定法;審查制度;司法行政 日期 2002 上傳時間 12-十二月-2008 14:06:58 (UTC+8) 摘要 Many states have placed judicial reform on their cross-century reform agenda.The direction of reform is determined by social and economic conditions of each state while the specific content of reform is determined by individual judicial system and the basic concepts supporting it.Although sharing a similar understanding of judicial authority,the continental legal system and the common law system have actually developed judicial concepts that are quite different from each other.As a result,whether in judicial organization,proceedings and the administration of the profession,the two legal systems differ remarkably.As they all link with one another,a practical reformer may only engage in functional adjustment on the basis of the system.The cross-century judicial reform launched in Taiwan is confronting an arduous challenge.Being bold and resolute in action than ever,the Taiwan “Judicial Yuan” has worked out an ambitious reform scheme.Much to our regret,however,the reformers have overlooked different judicial concepts behind the system.The scheme,as a matter of fact,is wavering between two concepts.This is likely to lead to a consumption of tremendous social cost.Yet due to failure to grasp the very cause of the decease,the reform will by no means solve the problems it intended to resolve.More problems may crop up eventually. 關聯 環球法律評論,2002(1),47-58 資料類型 article dc.contributor 法律系 - dc.creator (作者) 蘇永欽 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2002 en_US dc.date.accessioned 12-十二月-2008 14:06:58 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 12-十二月-2008 14:06:58 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 12-十二月-2008 14:06:58 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/13867 - dc.description.abstract (摘要) Many states have placed judicial reform on their cross-century reform agenda.The direction of reform is determined by social and economic conditions of each state while the specific content of reform is determined by individual judicial system and the basic concepts supporting it.Although sharing a similar understanding of judicial authority,the continental legal system and the common law system have actually developed judicial concepts that are quite different from each other.As a result,whether in judicial organization,proceedings and the administration of the profession,the two legal systems differ remarkably.As they all link with one another,a practical reformer may only engage in functional adjustment on the basis of the system.The cross-century judicial reform launched in Taiwan is confronting an arduous challenge.Being bold and resolute in action than ever,the Taiwan “Judicial Yuan” has worked out an ambitious reform scheme.Much to our regret,however,the reformers have overlooked different judicial concepts behind the system.The scheme,as a matter of fact,is wavering between two concepts.This is likely to lead to a consumption of tremendous social cost.Yet due to failure to grasp the very cause of the decease,the reform will by no means solve the problems it intended to resolve.More problems may crop up eventually. - dc.format application/ en_US dc.language zh-TW en_US dc.language en-US en_US dc.language.iso en_US - dc.relation (關聯) 環球法律評論,2002(1),47-58 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 法制基礎;司法問題;違憲審查;訴訟程序;行政法院;審判獨立;憲法解釋;實定法;審查制度;司法行政 - dc.title (題名) 飄移在兩種司法理念間的司法改革－台灣司法改革的社經背景與法制基礎 zh_TW dc.type (資料類型) article en
