學術產出-期刊論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 數位碩士班研究生線上學習、圖書館利用與學習成效之研究
Study on Online Learning, Library Use and Learning Effectiveness for E-learning Master Program Students in Taiwan
作者 王梅玲
Wang, Mei-Ling
張艾琦
Chang, Ai-Chi
貢獻者 圖檔所
關鍵詞 數位學習碩士在職專班 ;  學習成效  ;  圖書館利用 ;  線上學習
 E-learning Master Programs ;  Learning Effectiveness ;  Library Use ;  Online Learning
日期 2019-04
上傳時間 27-三月-2020 15:35:40 (UTC+8)
摘要 我國自2008 年起教育部推動數位學習碩士在職專班,提供在職工作者藉由線上教育獲得碩士學位。學習者感到數位學習方便有彈性,但其學習成效經常受到質疑。本研究旨在探討數位學習碩士在職專班研究生的線上學習經驗、圖書館利用情形、學習成效,以及影響學習成效的因素。本研究採用問卷調查法,以臺灣授予學位的數位學習碩士在職專班為研究對象,針對六校九所數位碩士班碩士生進行問卷調查,回收196 份問卷。研究結果顯示數位在職專班碩士生女性多於男性,平均年齡在31 歲至40 歲間,學生修習數位碩士班主要動機為自我追求、工作需要、升職;選擇數位學習上課因素主要考量家庭、工作與通勤時間。數位在職專班碩士生多使用圖書館電子資源並對圖書館感到滿意(平均4.07),肯定線上教學成效(平均4.57),線上課程平臺評價高(平均4.44),且自評學習成效良好(平均4.42)。學生對線上學習教學成效、課程平臺與教材、與圖書館滿意度與學生自評學習成效相關,顯示數位碩士生的線上教學成效、課程平臺與教材、圖書館滿意度高時,其自評學習成效也會提升。不同年級數位碩士生與圖書館電子資源使用頻次對其自評學習成效有差異。
Since 2008, the Ministry of Education has promoted a number of in‐service elearning master`s programs for working persons. Learners feel that e‐learning is convenient and flexible, but their learning effectiveness is often questioned. The purpose of this study is to explore the online learning, library use and learning effectiveness of in‐service elearning master progrm students and influencing factors of learning effectiveness. In this study, a survey was conducted to investigate in‐service elearning master progrms. The questionnaires were collected for nine master`s progams in six schools in Taiwan, and 196 responses were collected. The results show that there are more female students than males in the elearning master programs, and the average age is between 31 and 40 years old. The main motivation for learners to study the master`s programs are self‐pursuit, job needs, and promotion. The choice of elearning mainly considers family, work and commuting time. Elearning master students more use library electronic resources and have high satisfaction with the library (average 4.07), affirmation of the teaching effectiveness of elearning (average 4.57), good evaluation of the course platform (average 4.44), and self‐evaluation learning is effective (average 4.42). The teaching effectiveness of the elearning of students, the curriculum platform and teaching materials, and the satisfaction of the library are related to the self‐evaluation learning effectiveness of the students. It shows that when in‐service elearning master students are interested in the teaching effectiveness, course platform and teaching materials, and library satisfaction, the effectiveness of self‐assessment learning will also increase. In addition, different grades and use fequency of electronic resources in libraries has different effects on student learning effectivenesss.
關聯 圖書館學與資訊科學, Vol.45, No.1, pp.36- 64
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 圖檔所
dc.creator (作者) 王梅玲
dc.creator (作者) Wang, Mei-Ling
dc.creator (作者) 張艾琦
dc.creator (作者) Chang, Ai-Chi
dc.date (日期) 2019-04
dc.date.accessioned 27-三月-2020 15:35:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 27-三月-2020 15:35:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 27-三月-2020 15:35:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/129183-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 我國自2008 年起教育部推動數位學習碩士在職專班,提供在職工作者藉由線上教育獲得碩士學位。學習者感到數位學習方便有彈性,但其學習成效經常受到質疑。本研究旨在探討數位學習碩士在職專班研究生的線上學習經驗、圖書館利用情形、學習成效,以及影響學習成效的因素。本研究採用問卷調查法,以臺灣授予學位的數位學習碩士在職專班為研究對象,針對六校九所數位碩士班碩士生進行問卷調查,回收196 份問卷。研究結果顯示數位在職專班碩士生女性多於男性,平均年齡在31 歲至40 歲間,學生修習數位碩士班主要動機為自我追求、工作需要、升職;選擇數位學習上課因素主要考量家庭、工作與通勤時間。數位在職專班碩士生多使用圖書館電子資源並對圖書館感到滿意(平均4.07),肯定線上教學成效(平均4.57),線上課程平臺評價高(平均4.44),且自評學習成效良好(平均4.42)。學生對線上學習教學成效、課程平臺與教材、與圖書館滿意度與學生自評學習成效相關,顯示數位碩士生的線上教學成效、課程平臺與教材、圖書館滿意度高時,其自評學習成效也會提升。不同年級數位碩士生與圖書館電子資源使用頻次對其自評學習成效有差異。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Since 2008, the Ministry of Education has promoted a number of in‐service elearning master`s programs for working persons. Learners feel that e‐learning is convenient and flexible, but their learning effectiveness is often questioned. The purpose of this study is to explore the online learning, library use and learning effectiveness of in‐service elearning master progrm students and influencing factors of learning effectiveness. In this study, a survey was conducted to investigate in‐service elearning master progrms. The questionnaires were collected for nine master`s progams in six schools in Taiwan, and 196 responses were collected. The results show that there are more female students than males in the elearning master programs, and the average age is between 31 and 40 years old. The main motivation for learners to study the master`s programs are self‐pursuit, job needs, and promotion. The choice of elearning mainly considers family, work and commuting time. Elearning master students more use library electronic resources and have high satisfaction with the library (average 4.07), affirmation of the teaching effectiveness of elearning (average 4.57), good evaluation of the course platform (average 4.44), and self‐evaluation learning is effective (average 4.42). The teaching effectiveness of the elearning of students, the curriculum platform and teaching materials, and the satisfaction of the library are related to the self‐evaluation learning effectiveness of the students. It shows that when in‐service elearning master students are interested in the teaching effectiveness, course platform and teaching materials, and library satisfaction, the effectiveness of self‐assessment learning will also increase. In addition, different grades and use fequency of electronic resources in libraries has different effects on student learning effectivenesss.
dc.format.extent 1471962 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 圖書館學與資訊科學, Vol.45, No.1, pp.36- 64
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 數位學習碩士在職專班 ;  學習成效  ;  圖書館利用 ;  線上學習
dc.subject (關鍵詞)  E-learning Master Programs ;  Learning Effectiveness ;  Library Use ;  Online Learning
dc.title (題名) 數位碩士班研究生線上學習、圖書館利用與學習成效之研究
dc.title (題名) Study on Online Learning, Library Use and Learning Effectiveness for E-learning Master Program Students in Taiwan
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6245/JLIS.201904_45(1).0002
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) https://doi.org/ 10.6245/JLIS.201904_45(1).0002