學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 投資者對樂透型基金與持有樂透股基金之投資決策及績效
The Investment Decision and the Investment Performance on Lottery-like Funds and Lottery-holding Funds
作者 陳俊諺
Chen, Chun-Yen
貢獻者 陳鴻毅
Chen, Hong-Yi
陳俊諺
Chen, Chun-Yen
關鍵詞 樂透型基金
市場情緒
投資者行為
Lottery-like funds
Market sentiment
Investor behavior
日期 2020
上傳時間 1-七月-2020 13:37:22 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究藉由金融商品的獨特性波動度與獨特性偏態,提出新的指標來衡量金融商品的樂透程度。本研究發現基金投資者會偏好持有樂透型股票的基金而非樂透型基金;但當市場情緒較高時,基金投資者則偏好投資樂透型基金。在獲利能力方面,無論是持股有較高樂透性質的基金亦或是表現出樂透性質的基金皆帶來負報酬。然而在市場情緒高漲時,基金投資者較有能力選出較好之樂透型股票,因此基金投資者所選之持有樂透股的基金有較佳的表現。
In this study, I introduce a new indicator to measure the lottery-like degree of financial products by considering their idiosyncratic volatility and their idiosyncratic skewness. I find that investors tend to buy funds which hold lottery-like stocks, while investors prefer lottery-like funds when the market sentiment is high. In terms of profitability, both funds which hold lottery-like stocks and funds which exhibit lottery traits will experience relatively lower adjusted returns in the next quarter. However, I find that, when the market sentiment is high, investors can only obtain better performance from funds which hold lottery-like stocks, suggesting that investors can select lottery-like stocks better than select lottery-like funds during the high sentiment period.
參考文獻 Alldredge, D.M., 2019. Institutional trading, investor sentiment and lottery-like stock preferences. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3128588.
Baker, M., Wurgler, J., 2006. Investor sentiment and the cross‐section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645-1680.
Baker, M., Wurgler, J., 2007. Investor sentiment in the stock market. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 129-152.
Baker, S.R., Bloom, N., Davis, S.J., 2016. Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593-1636.
Bali, T.G., Cakici, N., Whitelaw, R.F., 2011. Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns. The Journal of Financial Economics, 99(2), 427-446.
Bali, T.G., Brown, S.J., Murray, S., Tang, Y., 2017. A lottery-demand-based explanation of the beta anomaly. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(6), 2369-2397.
Cremers, M., Ferreira, M.A., Matos, P., Starks, L., 2016. Indexing and active fund management: International evidence. The Journal of Financial Economics, 120(3), 539-560.
Kumar, A., 2009. Who gambles in the stock market? The Journal of Finance, 64(4), 1889-1933.
Fama, E.F., & French, K.R., 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. The Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3–56.
Goldie, B.A., Henry, T.R., Kassa, H., 2019. Does MAX matter for mutual funds? The European Financial Management, 25(4), 777-806.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財務管理學系
107357001
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107357001
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 陳鴻毅zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Hong-Yien_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 陳俊諺zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Chen, Chun-Yenen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳俊諺zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Chun-Yenen_US
dc.date (日期) 2020en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-七月-2020 13:37:22 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-七月-2020 13:37:22 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-七月-2020 13:37:22 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0107357001en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130523-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財務管理學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 107357001zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究藉由金融商品的獨特性波動度與獨特性偏態,提出新的指標來衡量金融商品的樂透程度。本研究發現基金投資者會偏好持有樂透型股票的基金而非樂透型基金;但當市場情緒較高時,基金投資者則偏好投資樂透型基金。在獲利能力方面,無論是持股有較高樂透性質的基金亦或是表現出樂透性質的基金皆帶來負報酬。然而在市場情緒高漲時,基金投資者較有能力選出較好之樂透型股票,因此基金投資者所選之持有樂透股的基金有較佳的表現。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In this study, I introduce a new indicator to measure the lottery-like degree of financial products by considering their idiosyncratic volatility and their idiosyncratic skewness. I find that investors tend to buy funds which hold lottery-like stocks, while investors prefer lottery-like funds when the market sentiment is high. In terms of profitability, both funds which hold lottery-like stocks and funds which exhibit lottery traits will experience relatively lower adjusted returns in the next quarter. However, I find that, when the market sentiment is high, investors can only obtain better performance from funds which hold lottery-like stocks, suggesting that investors can select lottery-like stocks better than select lottery-like funds during the high sentiment period.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 1. Introduction 1
2. Data and Variable Definitions 3
2.1 Data 3
2.2 Variable Definitions 4
2.2.1 MAX Constructed by IVOL and ISKEW 4
A. Stock’s MAX Constructed by Stock’s IVOL and Stock’s ISKEW 4
B. Fund’s MAX Constructed by Stock’s MAX 5
C. Fund’s MAX Constructed by Fund’s IVOL and Fund’s ISKEW 6
2.2.2 Control Variables 6
3. Empirical Results 9
3.1 Does MAX Change Investor’s Preference for Lottery-like Mutual Funds? 10
3.2 Does MAX Change Investor’s Preference for Lottery-like Mutual Funds Under Different Market Sentiments? 11
3.3 Profit from Investing in Lottery-like Mutual Funds 15
4. Conclusion 20
References 22
Appendix A. Alternative method to deal with missing value 41
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 6887821 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107357001en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 樂透型基金zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 市場情緒zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 投資者行為zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Lottery-like fundsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Market sentimenten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Investor behavioren_US
dc.title (題名) 投資者對樂透型基金與持有樂透股基金之投資決策及績效zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Investment Decision and the Investment Performance on Lottery-like Funds and Lottery-holding Fundsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alldredge, D.M., 2019. Institutional trading, investor sentiment and lottery-like stock preferences. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3128588.
Baker, M., Wurgler, J., 2006. Investor sentiment and the cross‐section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645-1680.
Baker, M., Wurgler, J., 2007. Investor sentiment in the stock market. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 129-152.
Baker, S.R., Bloom, N., Davis, S.J., 2016. Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593-1636.
Bali, T.G., Cakici, N., Whitelaw, R.F., 2011. Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns. The Journal of Financial Economics, 99(2), 427-446.
Bali, T.G., Brown, S.J., Murray, S., Tang, Y., 2017. A lottery-demand-based explanation of the beta anomaly. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(6), 2369-2397.
Cremers, M., Ferreira, M.A., Matos, P., Starks, L., 2016. Indexing and active fund management: International evidence. The Journal of Financial Economics, 120(3), 539-560.
Kumar, A., 2009. Who gambles in the stock market? The Journal of Finance, 64(4), 1889-1933.
Fama, E.F., & French, K.R., 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. The Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3–56.
Goldie, B.A., Henry, T.R., Kassa, H., 2019. Does MAX matter for mutual funds? The European Financial Management, 25(4), 777-806.
zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202000579en_US