學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 魔術愛好者的深度休閒資訊行為研究
Study on Magic Lover’s Information Behavior: from Perspectives of Serious Leisure作者 吳亞軒
Wu, Ya-Syuan貢獻者 王梅玲
Wang, Mei-Ling
吳亞軒
Wu, Ya-Syuan關鍵詞 深度休閒
魔術
嗜好者
業餘者
資訊行為
Serious leisure
Magic
Hobbyists
Amateurs
Information behavior日期 2020 上傳時間 3-八月-2020 17:50:03 (UTC+8) 摘要 在國內的魔術領域，由各大專院校的社團作為出發點，孕育了許多的魔術愛好者，其中，許多的魔術愛好者一次又一次的展示其不遜色於職業者的表現，而細究魔術表演的特性，即來自資訊的不對等而產生，是一種由於觀眾不了解秘密而產生的表演藝術，而令人好奇的是，究竟這些非職業者獲獎者是透過什麼樣的方式成功？其資訊世界又與一般的愛好者什麼樣的差異？至此，本研究希望通過結合「深度休閒」的理論出發，觀察非職業魔術表演者的群體的資訊世界，研究目的包括以下四項：（1）探討並建構魔術愛好者在深度休閒概念下的資訊行為模式。（2）探討具備魔術表演成就的魔術愛好者，其資訊行為會有何種特質。（3）探討魔術愛好者所接觸的社團關係對其資訊行為的影響。（4）探討資訊行為對業餘魔術師與魔術嗜好者涉及的深度休閒效益之影響。本研究使用深度訪談法，基於深度休閒理論，將魔術愛好者以成就表現區分為「具成就表現的業餘魔術師」與「不具成就表現的魔術嗜好者」作為訪談對象，探討的資訊行為內涵包括動機、情境、資訊需求、來源管道、評估原則與資訊活動，參考相關文獻與前測後完成主要研究工具「魔術愛好者訪談大綱」，共訪談業餘魔術師8名，魔術嗜好者10名，共計18名受訪者。本研究共得結論共十一項，包括：（1）魔術愛好者的資訊行為，會受到各種動機與其衍伸的情境，以及情境中的資訊需求、資訊活動環節影響。（2）魔術愛好者的動機是具備變動性質的，會受到各種因素引發成就導向。（3）在魔術愛好者之中，業餘魔術師的動機相較魔術嗜好者而言，具備更多「創新」取向，進而影響資訊行為的整體差異。（4）魔術愛好者之間對於魔術學習情境中的「練習」，概念上具有差異性。（5）業餘魔術師所接觸的魔術同儕階層，相對而言會提供更多的魔術知識與啟發的可能性。（6）魔術愛好者的資訊評估機制，相對而言更重視關係性而非參考權威。（7）魔術愛好者的資訊活動具有「測試」的類型，同時兩個群體間資訊活動類型的差異不大，但其背景脈絡仍有差異性。（8）業餘魔術師的獲獎因素同樣會建立在資訊行為模式的差異之上。（9）社團可以透過資源供給與人脈延伸兩種特性，提供魔術愛好者在資訊需求上的滿足，也可以透過生活參與的特性，提供高度社交滿足，同時可以以此協助魔術愛好者度過資訊行為中的困境。（10）魔術的知識傳遞在如今仍具有一定程度的封閉性。（11）業餘魔術師與魔術嗜好者隨時間涉入的深度休閒效益，在知識與經驗的表達與獲取上具有相對較明顯的落差，也會受到參與者所處在的資訊環境所影響。針對結果，本研究分別針對三種角色提供建議，建議魔術愛好者多嘗試接觸高階魔術資訊擁有者，增加魔術資訊接觸可能性，並嘗試不同的練習方式；建議魔術資訊提供者設計更多元的資訊面向支援，如音樂推薦或表演技巧等主題性網站；對於圖書館，則可嘗試建立魔術圖書機構，透過小型討論等聚會來推動。未來研究建議則可新增不同魔術專業性質比較；針對職業者進行研究，並將結果與本研究比較；更深刻的探討魔術愛好者背景異質性因素；針對更多類似魔術領域的「封閉」社群，做進一步的資訊行為調查；嘗試討論資訊行為對於深度休閒效益的影響面向，並建立量化的衡量指標。
In Taiwan, a lot of magic lovers have been bred by the clubs of colleges and universities. Among them, many magic lovers show its performance inferior to professionals, and examine the characteristics of magic performance, that is, from the information asymmetry, it is a performance art that is produced because the audience does not know the secret. Curiously, how did these non-professional winners succeed? What is the difference between its information world and the average enthusiast? So far, this research hopes to observe the information world of the group of non-professional magic performers by combining the theory of "serious leisure". The research objectives include the following four: (1) Explore and construct the information behavior pattern of magic lovers under the concept of serious leisure. (2) Discuss the characteristics of the information behavior of magic lovers with magic performance achievements. (3) Discuss the influence of the clubs of magic lovers on their information behavior. (4) Explore the impact of information behavior on the serious leisure benefits involved by amateur magicians and magic hobbyists.This study uses in-depth interviews. Based on the theory of serious leisure, the performance of magic lovers is divided into "amateur magician" with achievement performance and "magic hobbyists" without achievement performance as the interview subjects. The connotations of information behaviors discussed include motivation, situation, information needs, information channels, evaluation principles and information activities, referring to relevant literature and completing the main research tool "Magic Lovers’ Interview Outline" after pre-testing, interviewed 8 amateur magicians, 10 magic hobbyists, with a total of 18 respondents.This study has the following eleven conclusions: (1) The information behavior of magic lovers will be affected by various motivation and their derived situations, as well as the information needs and information activities in the situation. (2) The motivation of magic lovers will be of a changing nature and will be guided by achievements caused by various factors. (3) Among magic lovers, amateur magicians have more "innovative" orientations than magic hobbyists, which in turn affects information behavior. (4) The "practice" of magic learning situations among magic lovers is conceptually different. (5) The magic peers contacted by amateur magicians will relatively provide more magic knowledge and the possibility of inspiration. (6) The information evaluation mechanism of magic lovers, relatively speaking, pays more attention to relation than reference authority. (7) The information activities of magic lovers have the type of "testing". At the same time, the types of information activities between the two groups are not very different, but their backgrounds are still different. (8) The winning factors of amateur magicians will also be based on differences in information behavior patterns. (9) The community can provide the satisfaction of magic lovers with information needs through resource supply and network extension. It can also provide a high degree of social satisfaction through the characteristics of life participation. At the same time, it can help magic lovers to overcome the difficulties in information behavior. (10) The knowledge dissemination of magic still has a certain degree of closure today. (11) The serious leisure benefits involved by amateur magicians and magic hobbyists over time have a relatively obvious gap in the expression and acquisition of knowledge and experience, and are also affected by the information environment in which the participants are located.Based on the results, this study provides suggestions for three roles. It is recommended that magic lovers try to contact high-level magic information owners, increase the possibility of magic information contact, and try different practice methods; it is recommended that magic information providers design more diverse information for supporting, such as theme websites of music recommendation or performance skills; for libraries, you can try to set up a magic information institution and promote it through small discussions and other gatherings. Future research suggestions can add a comparison of the nature of different magic professions; conduct research on professionals and compare the results with this study; explore the background heterogeneity factors of magic lovers more deeply; target more "closed" community similar to the magic’s community, do further information behavior surveys; try to discuss the impact of information behavior on the benefits of deep leisure, and establish quantitative metrics.參考文獻 巴鎮（2008）。魔術產業結構變遷研究。國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文，台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/z2jtax文沛然（2009）。探討成年學習者與國小學童對科學魔術的看法。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，彰化縣。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/24x9es王明怡（2010）。從深度休閒的觀點看休閒資訊的獲取與表達：以居室美化部落客『愛戀古典同好會』為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學系暨研究所，台北市。吳祚漢（2013）。魔術在媒體科技時代的多元表現形式：重新詮釋現代魔術表演定義。崑山科技大學媒體藝術研究所碩士論文，台南市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/45v379吳俊憲（2010）。教師專業學習社群：意涵，理論與推動策略。師培實習輔導通訊，3-4。吳瑋芝（2013）。魔術表演配樂之個案研究。臺北市立教育大學音樂學系教學碩士學位班碩士論文，臺北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/a8tw7f呂俊毅（2011）。魔術師之自我養成與表演效果。資訊傳播研究，2(1)，37-54。doi:10.6144/JIC.2011.0201.03李郁雅（2000）。博士論文研究歷程中情境與資訊行為之探索: 以植物分類學為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，台北市。林技寬（2011）。魔術劇團之行銷研究─以《鏡子劇團》為例。康寧大學休閒管理研究所碩士論文，台南市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/psmm8j林珊如（2002）。網路使用者特性與資訊行為研究趨勢之探討。圖書資訊學刊，17，35-47。林珊如（2005）。深度休閒與資訊行為研究。圖書資訊學刊，3（1&2），頁15-22。doi:10.6182/jlis.2005.3(1.2).015張郁蔚（2005）。日常生活資訊尋求模式之探討。國家圖書館館刊，94（2），73-99。張郁蔚、呂淑慧（2014）。大學圖書館館員於職場之資訊尋求行為研究。大學圖書館，18(1)，14-32。doi:10.6146/univj.18-1.02梁英文 & 曹勝雄（2007） 認真性休閒與場所依戀之關係：遊憩專門化扮演的角色。戶外遊憩研究，20(3)，1-24。陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。臺北市：五南。陳宣毅（2018）。烹飪嗜好者的深度休閒特徵及其資訊行為研究。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文，台北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/u2765w陳昭雄、林合懋、張同廟 & 潘怡君（2006）。影響大專校院校園社團發展因素之探討-社團幹部與課指組師長認知態度之比較。弘光學報， (49)，13-36。陳餘鋆（2012）。深度休閒者參與者類型與休閒效益之探討—以台南地區游泳池早泳參與者為例。台灣水域運動學報，(3)，35-62。doi:10.29757/JAS.201204.0003游健祥（2008）。從深度休閒觀點探討寵物飼主在貓咪飼養過程中的資訊現象。世新大學資訊傳播學研究所(含碩專班)碩士論文，臺北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8rq6gg搞怪魔術帽（2013）。把魔術當志向？七種職業魔術師的類型介紹！。2020年1月3日，取自：https://hatemyhat.com/promagicians/搞怪魔術帽（2014）。7件我希望在我魔術入門時就知道的事。2019年10月13日，取自：https://hatemyhat.com/7things-for-magic-beginner/搞怪魔術帽（2019a）。現代魔術學習者缺乏的3個能力。2019年9月15日，取自：https://hatemyhat.com/3skillsformagician/搞怪魔術帽（2019b）。學魔術一定要加入社團嗎？為什麼大學魔術社要有成果展？2019年9月15日，取自：https://hatemyhat.com/why-magic-club/劉虹伶（2005）。深度休閒者之休閒效益。大專體育，78，116-122。蔡尚勳（2007）。深度休閒中的資訊活動：以業餘街舞者為例。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文，台北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/p83yn2蔡凱丞（2011）。魔術表演藝術導入電子商務行銷之研究。義守大學管理學院管理碩士班碩士論文，高雄市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/h626tp賴柏承（2012）。科學魔術融入5E探究教學對八年級學生之學習成效-以摩擦力單元為例。國立彰化師範大學物理學系碩士論文，彰化縣。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/rb99f6闕壯耘（2019）。燕尾服裡的祕密：魔術師的專業建立與自我成長之敘說探究。中國文化大學心理輔導學系碩士論文，台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/wm8waq羅賓（2007）。談公開破解魔術。檢索日期：2019年7月20日。取自https://www.student.tw/topic/69040-%E3%80%90%E8%BD%89%E8%B12%BC%E3%80%91%E8%AB%87%E5%85%AC%E9%96%8B%E7%A0%B14%E8%A7%A3%E9%AD%94%E8%A1%93-by-%E5%8D%9A%E7%A5%9E%E7%BE%85%E8%B13%93Akerlof, G. A. (1997). The market for" lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Readings in Microeconomic Theory, 285.Awamura, Norihisa (2006). Rethinking the Information Behavior Model of Information Encountering: an Analysis of the Interviews on Information Encountering on the Web. Library & information science, 55, 47-69.Baldwin, C. K., & Norris, P. A. (1999). Exploring the dimensions of serious leisure:“Love me—love my dog!”. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(1), 1-17.Bates, M. J. (2009). Information Behavior. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, Third Edition (pp. 2381-2391). Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1081/E-ELIS3-120043263Belkin, N. (1978). Information concepts for information science. Journal of Documentation, 34(1). 55-85.Brightbill, C. K. (1961), Man and leisure: A philosophy of recreation, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Brown, C. A. (2007). The Carolina shaggers: Dance as serious leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(4), 623-647.Butterworth, P. (2005). Magic on the Early English Stage. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Case, D. O., & Given, L. M. (2016). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs and behavior. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.Christian, P. (1994). The History and Practice of Magic. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing.Christopher, M. (1991). Magic: A Picture History. New York: Courier Dover Publications. (Original work published 1962)Christopher, M. (2005). The Illustrated History of Magic. New York, NY: Carroll & Graf Publishers.Denhardt, R. B., Denhardt, J. V., Aristigueta, M. P., & Rawlings, K. C. (2018). Managing human behavior in public and nonprofit organizations. CQ Press.Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-Making theory and practice: An overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 36-46.Dervin, B., & Frenette, M. (2001). Sense-Making Methodology: Communicating Communicatively with Campaign Audiences. In R. E. Rice & C. K. Atkin, Public Communication Campaigns (3rd ed., pp. 69-87). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.Erdelez, S. (1999). Information encountering: It`s more than just bumping into information. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 25(3), 26-29.Gould, J., Moore, D., Karlin, N. J., Gaede, D. B., Walker, J., & Dotterweich, A. R. (2011). Measuring serious leisure in chess: Model confirmation and method bias. Leisure Sciences, 33(4), 332-340.Gould, J., Moore, D., McGuire, F., & Stebbins, R. (2008). Development of the serious leisure inventory and measure. Journal of Leisure Research, 40(1), 47-68.Guiley, R. (2006). The encyclopedia of magic and alchemy. Infobase Publishing.Hartel, J. (2003). The serious leisure frontier in library and information science:Hobby domains. Knowledge Organization, 30(3/4), 228-238.Hartel, J. (2006). Information activities and resources in an episode of gourmet cooking. Information Research, 12(1) paper 281. Retrieved from InformationR.net/ir/12-1/paper282.htmlHartel, J. (2010). Leisure and hobby information and its users. Encyclopedia of library and information sciences, 3263-3274.Hartel, J., Cox, A. M., & Griffin, B. L. (2016). Information activity in serious leisure. Information Research, 21(4). Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/21-4/paper728.htmlHektor, A. (2001). What`s the use: Internet and information behavior in everyday life. Linkoping, Sweden: Linkoping University.Hewitt, L. (2009). The History of Magic from Dark Art to Pop Entertainment. Retrieved July 18, 2019, from https://www.historicmysteries.com/history-of-magic/Jones, G. (2011). Trade of the tricks: Inside the magician`s craft. University of California Press.Krikelas, J. (1983). Information-Seeking Behavior: Patterns and Concepts. Drexel Library Quarterly, 19(2), 5-20.Loshin, J. (2007). Secrets Revealed: How Magicians Protect Intellectual Property Without Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1005564.Magic. (2007). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved July 18, 2019, from https://academic-eb-com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/levels/collegiate/article/magic/108514#McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. CUP Archive, Cambridge University Press.Rissanen, O., Pitkänen, P., Juvonen, A., Kuhn, G., & Hakkarainen, K. (2014). Expertise among professional magicians: an interview study. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 1484.Savolainen, R. (1995). Everyday life information seeking: Approaching information seeking in the context of “way of life”. Library and Information Science Research, 17(3), 259-294.Scott, R. (2009). The Discovery of Witchcraft. BiblioBazaar Publishing. (Original work published 1584)Sheets, B. (2006). A short history of magic.... Retrieved July 18, 2019, from https://web.archive.org/web/20060515125440/http://www.magiczoom.com/history-of-magic.htm#cons10Shen, X. S., & Yarnal, C. (2010). Blowing open the serious leisure-casual leisure dichotomy: what`s in there?. Leisure Sciences, 32(2), 162-179.Sonnenwald, D.H. (1999) Evolving Perspectives of Human Information Behavior: Contexts, Situations, Social Networks and Information Horizons, in Wilson, T.D. and Allen, D. K., Eds. Exploring the Contexts of Information Behavior: Proceedings of the Second International Conference in Information Needs, 176-190. Taylor Graham.Stebbins, R. A. (1982). Serious leisure: A conceptual statement. Pacific sociological review, 25(2), 251-272.Stebbins, R. A. (1992). Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. Montréal: McGill-Queen`s Press-MQUP.Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Serious leisure. Society, 38(4), 53-57.Stebbins, R. A. (2005). Project‐based leisure: theoretical neglect of a common use of free time. Leisure Studies, 24(1), 1-11.Stebbins, R. A. (2007). Serious leisure: A perspective for our time. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Stebbins, R. A. (2008). Right leisure: Serious, casual, or project-based?. NeuroRehabilitation, 23(4), 335-341.Stebbins, R. A. (2009). Leisure and its relationship to library and: information science: bridging the gap. Library trends, 57(4), 618-631.Steinmeyer, J. (2004). Hiding the Elephant: How Magicians Invented the Impossible and Learned to Disappear. New York, NY: Carroll & Graf Publishers.Taylor, R. S. (1968). Question-negotiation and Information Seeking in Libraries. College and Research Libraries, 29(3), 178-194Taylor, R. S. (1991). Information use environments. In Dervin, B. and M.J. Voight (Eds.). Progress in Communication Sciences, Vol. 10. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp. 217-255.Veal, A. J. (2017) The Serious Leisure Perspective and the Experience of Leisure, Leisure Sciences, 39(3) , 205-223, DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2016.1189367Weber, K. J. (2003). Maximum Entertainment: director’s notes for magicians and mentalists. New York: NY: Ken Weber Productions.Williamson, K. (1998). Discovered by chance: The role incidental information acquisition in an ecological model of information use. Library & Information Science Research, 20(1), 23-40.Wilson, T. D. (1981). On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 3-15.Wilson, T.D. (1999). Models in Information Behaviour Research. Journal of Documentation. 55(3). 249-270. 10.1108/EUM0000000007145.Wilson, T.D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-56. Retrieve June 4, 2012, from http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol3/v3n2p49-56.pdf. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
107155005資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107155005 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 王梅玲 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Wang, Mei-Ling en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 吳亞軒 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Wu, Ya-Syuan en_US dc.creator (作者) 吳亞軒 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Wu, Ya-Syuan en_US dc.date (日期) 2020 en_US dc.date.accessioned 3-八月-2020 17:50:03 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 3-八月-2020 17:50:03 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-八月-2020 17:50:03 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0107155005 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131069 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 圖書資訊與檔案學研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 107155005 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在國內的魔術領域，由各大專院校的社團作為出發點，孕育了許多的魔術愛好者，其中，許多的魔術愛好者一次又一次的展示其不遜色於職業者的表現，而細究魔術表演的特性，即來自資訊的不對等而產生，是一種由於觀眾不了解秘密而產生的表演藝術，而令人好奇的是，究竟這些非職業者獲獎者是透過什麼樣的方式成功？其資訊世界又與一般的愛好者什麼樣的差異？至此，本研究希望通過結合「深度休閒」的理論出發，觀察非職業魔術表演者的群體的資訊世界，研究目的包括以下四項：（1）探討並建構魔術愛好者在深度休閒概念下的資訊行為模式。（2）探討具備魔術表演成就的魔術愛好者，其資訊行為會有何種特質。（3）探討魔術愛好者所接觸的社團關係對其資訊行為的影響。（4）探討資訊行為對業餘魔術師與魔術嗜好者涉及的深度休閒效益之影響。本研究使用深度訪談法，基於深度休閒理論，將魔術愛好者以成就表現區分為「具成就表現的業餘魔術師」與「不具成就表現的魔術嗜好者」作為訪談對象，探討的資訊行為內涵包括動機、情境、資訊需求、來源管道、評估原則與資訊活動，參考相關文獻與前測後完成主要研究工具「魔術愛好者訪談大綱」，共訪談業餘魔術師8名，魔術嗜好者10名，共計18名受訪者。本研究共得結論共十一項，包括：（1）魔術愛好者的資訊行為，會受到各種動機與其衍伸的情境，以及情境中的資訊需求、資訊活動環節影響。（2）魔術愛好者的動機是具備變動性質的，會受到各種因素引發成就導向。（3）在魔術愛好者之中，業餘魔術師的動機相較魔術嗜好者而言，具備更多「創新」取向，進而影響資訊行為的整體差異。（4）魔術愛好者之間對於魔術學習情境中的「練習」，概念上具有差異性。（5）業餘魔術師所接觸的魔術同儕階層，相對而言會提供更多的魔術知識與啟發的可能性。（6）魔術愛好者的資訊評估機制，相對而言更重視關係性而非參考權威。（7）魔術愛好者的資訊活動具有「測試」的類型，同時兩個群體間資訊活動類型的差異不大，但其背景脈絡仍有差異性。（8）業餘魔術師的獲獎因素同樣會建立在資訊行為模式的差異之上。（9）社團可以透過資源供給與人脈延伸兩種特性，提供魔術愛好者在資訊需求上的滿足，也可以透過生活參與的特性，提供高度社交滿足，同時可以以此協助魔術愛好者度過資訊行為中的困境。（10）魔術的知識傳遞在如今仍具有一定程度的封閉性。（11）業餘魔術師與魔術嗜好者隨時間涉入的深度休閒效益，在知識與經驗的表達與獲取上具有相對較明顯的落差，也會受到參與者所處在的資訊環境所影響。針對結果，本研究分別針對三種角色提供建議，建議魔術愛好者多嘗試接觸高階魔術資訊擁有者，增加魔術資訊接觸可能性，並嘗試不同的練習方式；建議魔術資訊提供者設計更多元的資訊面向支援，如音樂推薦或表演技巧等主題性網站；對於圖書館，則可嘗試建立魔術圖書機構，透過小型討論等聚會來推動。未來研究建議則可新增不同魔術專業性質比較；針對職業者進行研究，並將結果與本研究比較；更深刻的探討魔術愛好者背景異質性因素；針對更多類似魔術領域的「封閉」社群，做進一步的資訊行為調查；嘗試討論資訊行為對於深度休閒效益的影響面向，並建立量化的衡量指標。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) In Taiwan, a lot of magic lovers have been bred by the clubs of colleges and universities. Among them, many magic lovers show its performance inferior to professionals, and examine the characteristics of magic performance, that is, from the information asymmetry, it is a performance art that is produced because the audience does not know the secret. Curiously, how did these non-professional winners succeed? What is the difference between its information world and the average enthusiast? So far, this research hopes to observe the information world of the group of non-professional magic performers by combining the theory of "serious leisure". The research objectives include the following four: (1) Explore and construct the information behavior pattern of magic lovers under the concept of serious leisure. (2) Discuss the characteristics of the information behavior of magic lovers with magic performance achievements. (3) Discuss the influence of the clubs of magic lovers on their information behavior. (4) Explore the impact of information behavior on the serious leisure benefits involved by amateur magicians and magic hobbyists.This study uses in-depth interviews. Based on the theory of serious leisure, the performance of magic lovers is divided into "amateur magician" with achievement performance and "magic hobbyists" without achievement performance as the interview subjects. The connotations of information behaviors discussed include motivation, situation, information needs, information channels, evaluation principles and information activities, referring to relevant literature and completing the main research tool "Magic Lovers’ Interview Outline" after pre-testing, interviewed 8 amateur magicians, 10 magic hobbyists, with a total of 18 respondents.This study has the following eleven conclusions: (1) The information behavior of magic lovers will be affected by various motivation and their derived situations, as well as the information needs and information activities in the situation. (2) The motivation of magic lovers will be of a changing nature and will be guided by achievements caused by various factors. (3) Among magic lovers, amateur magicians have more "innovative" orientations than magic hobbyists, which in turn affects information behavior. (4) The "practice" of magic learning situations among magic lovers is conceptually different. (5) The magic peers contacted by amateur magicians will relatively provide more magic knowledge and the possibility of inspiration. (6) The information evaluation mechanism of magic lovers, relatively speaking, pays more attention to relation than reference authority. (7) The information activities of magic lovers have the type of "testing". At the same time, the types of information activities between the two groups are not very different, but their backgrounds are still different. (8) The winning factors of amateur magicians will also be based on differences in information behavior patterns. (9) The community can provide the satisfaction of magic lovers with information needs through resource supply and network extension. It can also provide a high degree of social satisfaction through the characteristics of life participation. At the same time, it can help magic lovers to overcome the difficulties in information behavior. (10) The knowledge dissemination of magic still has a certain degree of closure today. (11) The serious leisure benefits involved by amateur magicians and magic hobbyists over time have a relatively obvious gap in the expression and acquisition of knowledge and experience, and are also affected by the information environment in which the participants are located.Based on the results, this study provides suggestions for three roles. It is recommended that magic lovers try to contact high-level magic information owners, increase the possibility of magic information contact, and try different practice methods; it is recommended that magic information providers design more diverse information for supporting, such as theme websites of music recommendation or performance skills; for libraries, you can try to set up a magic information institution and promote it through small discussions and other gatherings. Future research suggestions can add a comparison of the nature of different magic professions; conduct research on professionals and compare the results with this study; explore the background heterogeneity factors of magic lovers more deeply; target more "closed" community similar to the magic’s community, do further information behavior surveys; try to discuss the impact of information behavior on the benefits of deep leisure, and establish quantitative metrics. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究動機 1第二節 研究目的 5第三節 研究問題 5第四節 名詞解釋 6第二章 文獻探討 9第一節 魔術愛好者 9第二節 深度休閒 19第三節 休閒生活的資訊行為研究 23第三章 研究方法與實施 35第一節 研究範圍與限制 35第二節 研究設計 38第三節 研究方法 40第四節 研究工具 41第五節 資料蒐集與分析 43第六節 研究步驟 48第四章 研究結果與分析 51第一節 基本資料 51第二節 魔術愛好者的動機與情境 57第三節 魔術愛好者的資訊需求 95第四節 魔術愛好者的資訊活動 107第五節 魔術表演的重要因素 112第六節 綜合討論 118第五章 結論與建議 137第一節 結論 137第二節 建議 141參考文獻 145附錄一 知情同意書 153附錄二 訪談大綱 154附錄三 國內大學與社會性魔術社團名錄 155 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2879612 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107155005 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 深度休閒 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 魔術 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 嗜好者 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 業餘者 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資訊行為 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Serious leisure en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Magic en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Hobbyists en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Amateurs en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Information behavior en_US dc.title (題名) 魔術愛好者的深度休閒資訊行為研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Study on Magic Lover’s Information Behavior: from Perspectives of Serious Leisure en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 巴鎮（2008）。魔術產業結構變遷研究。國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文，台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/z2jtax文沛然（2009）。探討成年學習者與國小學童對科學魔術的看法。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，彰化縣。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/24x9es王明怡（2010）。從深度休閒的觀點看休閒資訊的獲取與表達：以居室美化部落客『愛戀古典同好會』為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學系暨研究所，台北市。吳祚漢（2013）。魔術在媒體科技時代的多元表現形式：重新詮釋現代魔術表演定義。崑山科技大學媒體藝術研究所碩士論文，台南市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/45v379吳俊憲（2010）。教師專業學習社群：意涵，理論與推動策略。師培實習輔導通訊，3-4。吳瑋芝（2013）。魔術表演配樂之個案研究。臺北市立教育大學音樂學系教學碩士學位班碩士論文，臺北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/a8tw7f呂俊毅（2011）。魔術師之自我養成與表演效果。資訊傳播研究，2(1)，37-54。doi:10.6144/JIC.2011.0201.03李郁雅（2000）。博士論文研究歷程中情境與資訊行為之探索: 以植物分類學為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，台北市。林技寬（2011）。魔術劇團之行銷研究─以《鏡子劇團》為例。康寧大學休閒管理研究所碩士論文，台南市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/psmm8j林珊如（2002）。網路使用者特性與資訊行為研究趨勢之探討。圖書資訊學刊，17，35-47。林珊如（2005）。深度休閒與資訊行為研究。圖書資訊學刊，3（1&2），頁15-22。doi:10.6182/jlis.2005.3(1.2).015張郁蔚（2005）。日常生活資訊尋求模式之探討。國家圖書館館刊，94（2），73-99。張郁蔚、呂淑慧（2014）。大學圖書館館員於職場之資訊尋求行為研究。大學圖書館，18(1)，14-32。doi:10.6146/univj.18-1.02梁英文 & 曹勝雄（2007） 認真性休閒與場所依戀之關係：遊憩專門化扮演的角色。戶外遊憩研究，20(3)，1-24。陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。臺北市：五南。陳宣毅（2018）。烹飪嗜好者的深度休閒特徵及其資訊行為研究。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文，台北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/u2765w陳昭雄、林合懋、張同廟 & 潘怡君（2006）。影響大專校院校園社團發展因素之探討-社團幹部與課指組師長認知態度之比較。弘光學報， (49)，13-36。陳餘鋆（2012）。深度休閒者參與者類型與休閒效益之探討—以台南地區游泳池早泳參與者為例。台灣水域運動學報，(3)，35-62。doi:10.29757/JAS.201204.0003游健祥（2008）。從深度休閒觀點探討寵物飼主在貓咪飼養過程中的資訊現象。世新大學資訊傳播學研究所(含碩專班)碩士論文，臺北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8rq6gg搞怪魔術帽（2013）。把魔術當志向？七種職業魔術師的類型介紹！。2020年1月3日，取自：https://hatemyhat.com/promagicians/搞怪魔術帽（2014）。7件我希望在我魔術入門時就知道的事。2019年10月13日，取自：https://hatemyhat.com/7things-for-magic-beginner/搞怪魔術帽（2019a）。現代魔術學習者缺乏的3個能力。2019年9月15日，取自：https://hatemyhat.com/3skillsformagician/搞怪魔術帽（2019b）。學魔術一定要加入社團嗎？為什麼大學魔術社要有成果展？2019年9月15日，取自：https://hatemyhat.com/why-magic-club/劉虹伶（2005）。深度休閒者之休閒效益。大專體育，78，116-122。蔡尚勳（2007）。深度休閒中的資訊活動：以業餘街舞者為例。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文，台北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/p83yn2蔡凱丞（2011）。魔術表演藝術導入電子商務行銷之研究。義守大學管理學院管理碩士班碩士論文，高雄市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/h626tp賴柏承（2012）。科學魔術融入5E探究教學對八年級學生之學習成效-以摩擦力單元為例。國立彰化師範大學物理學系碩士論文，彰化縣。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/rb99f6闕壯耘（2019）。燕尾服裡的祕密：魔術師的專業建立與自我成長之敘說探究。中國文化大學心理輔導學系碩士論文，台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/wm8waq羅賓（2007）。談公開破解魔術。檢索日期：2019年7月20日。取自https://www.student.tw/topic/69040-%E3%80%90%E8%BD%89%E8%B12%BC%E3%80%91%E8%AB%87%E5%85%AC%E9%96%8B%E7%A0%B14%E8%A7%A3%E9%AD%94%E8%A1%93-by-%E5%8D%9A%E7%A5%9E%E7%BE%85%E8%B13%93Akerlof, G. A. (1997). The market for" lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Readings in Microeconomic Theory, 285.Awamura, Norihisa (2006). Rethinking the Information Behavior Model of Information Encountering: an Analysis of the Interviews on Information Encountering on the Web. Library & information science, 55, 47-69.Baldwin, C. K., & Norris, P. A. (1999). Exploring the dimensions of serious leisure:“Love me—love my dog!”. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(1), 1-17.Bates, M. J. (2009). Information Behavior. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, Third Edition (pp. 2381-2391). Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1081/E-ELIS3-120043263Belkin, N. (1978). Information concepts for information science. Journal of Documentation, 34(1). 55-85.Brightbill, C. K. (1961), Man and leisure: A philosophy of recreation, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Brown, C. A. (2007). The Carolina shaggers: Dance as serious leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(4), 623-647.Butterworth, P. (2005). Magic on the Early English Stage. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Case, D. O., & Given, L. M. (2016). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs and behavior. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.Christian, P. (1994). The History and Practice of Magic. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing.Christopher, M. (1991). Magic: A Picture History. New York: Courier Dover Publications. (Original work published 1962)Christopher, M. (2005). The Illustrated History of Magic. New York, NY: Carroll & Graf Publishers.Denhardt, R. B., Denhardt, J. V., Aristigueta, M. P., & Rawlings, K. C. (2018). Managing human behavior in public and nonprofit organizations. CQ Press.Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-Making theory and practice: An overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 36-46.Dervin, B., & Frenette, M. (2001). Sense-Making Methodology: Communicating Communicatively with Campaign Audiences. In R. E. Rice & C. K. Atkin, Public Communication Campaigns (3rd ed., pp. 69-87). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.Erdelez, S. (1999). Information encountering: It`s more than just bumping into information. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 25(3), 26-29.Gould, J., Moore, D., Karlin, N. J., Gaede, D. B., Walker, J., & Dotterweich, A. R. (2011). Measuring serious leisure in chess: Model confirmation and method bias. Leisure Sciences, 33(4), 332-340.Gould, J., Moore, D., McGuire, F., & Stebbins, R. (2008). Development of the serious leisure inventory and measure. Journal of Leisure Research, 40(1), 47-68.Guiley, R. (2006). The encyclopedia of magic and alchemy. Infobase Publishing.Hartel, J. (2003). The serious leisure frontier in library and information science:Hobby domains. Knowledge Organization, 30(3/4), 228-238.Hartel, J. (2006). Information activities and resources in an episode of gourmet cooking. Information Research, 12(1) paper 281. Retrieved from InformationR.net/ir/12-1/paper282.htmlHartel, J. (2010). Leisure and hobby information and its users. Encyclopedia of library and information sciences, 3263-3274.Hartel, J., Cox, A. M., & Griffin, B. L. (2016). Information activity in serious leisure. Information Research, 21(4). Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/21-4/paper728.htmlHektor, A. (2001). What`s the use: Internet and information behavior in everyday life. Linkoping, Sweden: Linkoping University.Hewitt, L. (2009). The History of Magic from Dark Art to Pop Entertainment. Retrieved July 18, 2019, from https://www.historicmysteries.com/history-of-magic/Jones, G. (2011). Trade of the tricks: Inside the magician`s craft. University of California Press.Krikelas, J. (1983). Information-Seeking Behavior: Patterns and Concepts. Drexel Library Quarterly, 19(2), 5-20.Loshin, J. (2007). Secrets Revealed: How Magicians Protect Intellectual Property Without Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1005564.Magic. (2007). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved July 18, 2019, from https://academic-eb-com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/levels/collegiate/article/magic/108514#McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. CUP Archive, Cambridge University Press.Rissanen, O., Pitkänen, P., Juvonen, A., Kuhn, G., & Hakkarainen, K. (2014). Expertise among professional magicians: an interview study. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 1484.Savolainen, R. (1995). Everyday life information seeking: Approaching information seeking in the context of “way of life”. Library and Information Science Research, 17(3), 259-294.Scott, R. (2009). The Discovery of Witchcraft. BiblioBazaar Publishing. (Original work published 1584)Sheets, B. (2006). A short history of magic.... Retrieved July 18, 2019, from https://web.archive.org/web/20060515125440/http://www.magiczoom.com/history-of-magic.htm#cons10Shen, X. S., & Yarnal, C. (2010). Blowing open the serious leisure-casual leisure dichotomy: what`s in there?. Leisure Sciences, 32(2), 162-179.Sonnenwald, D.H. (1999) Evolving Perspectives of Human Information Behavior: Contexts, Situations, Social Networks and Information Horizons, in Wilson, T.D. and Allen, D. K., Eds. Exploring the Contexts of Information Behavior: Proceedings of the Second International Conference in Information Needs, 176-190. Taylor Graham.Stebbins, R. A. (1982). Serious leisure: A conceptual statement. Pacific sociological review, 25(2), 251-272.Stebbins, R. A. (1992). Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. Montréal: McGill-Queen`s Press-MQUP.Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Serious leisure. Society, 38(4), 53-57.Stebbins, R. A. (2005). Project‐based leisure: theoretical neglect of a common use of free time. Leisure Studies, 24(1), 1-11.Stebbins, R. A. (2007). Serious leisure: A perspective for our time. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Stebbins, R. A. (2008). Right leisure: Serious, casual, or project-based?. NeuroRehabilitation, 23(4), 335-341.Stebbins, R. A. (2009). Leisure and its relationship to library and: information science: bridging the gap. Library trends, 57(4), 618-631.Steinmeyer, J. (2004). Hiding the Elephant: How Magicians Invented the Impossible and Learned to Disappear. New York, NY: Carroll & Graf Publishers.Taylor, R. S. (1968). Question-negotiation and Information Seeking in Libraries. College and Research Libraries, 29(3), 178-194Taylor, R. S. (1991). Information use environments. In Dervin, B. and M.J. Voight (Eds.). Progress in Communication Sciences, Vol. 10. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp. 217-255.Veal, A. J. (2017) The Serious Leisure Perspective and the Experience of Leisure, Leisure Sciences, 39(3) , 205-223, DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2016.1189367Weber, K. J. (2003). Maximum Entertainment: director’s notes for magicians and mentalists. New York: NY: Ken Weber Productions.Williamson, K. (1998). Discovered by chance: The role incidental information acquisition in an ecological model of information use. Library & Information Science Research, 20(1), 23-40.Wilson, T. D. (1981). On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 3-15.Wilson, T.D. (1999). Models in Information Behaviour Research. Journal of Documentation. 55(3). 249-270. 10.1108/EUM0000000007145.Wilson, T.D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-56. Retrieve June 4, 2012, from http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol3/v3n2p49-56.pdf. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202000825 en_US
