學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 英語系與非英語系國家高等教育課程國際化治理之比較—以美國與台灣之大學為例
A Comparative Study on Internationalized Curriculum Governance in Higher Education between English-speaking and Non-English-speaking Countries— Cases from one United States’ and one Taiwan’s University
作者 林俐
Lin, Li
貢獻者 侯永琪
林俐
Lin, Li
關鍵詞 課程國際化
國際化
高等教育
美國
台灣
Internationalized curriculum
Internationalization
Higher education
United States
Taiwan
日期 2020
上傳時間 3-八月-2020 18:23:40 (UTC+8)
摘要 在全球化的強烈衝擊下,國際化成為各個高等教育機構最重視的發展項目之一,其中課程的國際化更在近年逐漸受到重視。此篇研究將探討英語系與非英語系國家在高等教育課程國際化治理上的發展,以美國與台灣兩所大學作為主要研究對象,由政策執行者及教師的角度出發,了解兩校在課程國際化中四個向度:學校國際化政策、行政支援、計畫發展與課程發展的現況及異同。此外,由於研究對象分別來自英語系與非英語系國家,此篇研究也將特別探討授課語言(英語)在課程國際化所扮演的角色及其所帶來的影響。藉由探討以上五個向度,期望深入了解兩個學校所屬的框架背景,並進行分析討論。研究結果發現兩校在課程國際化方面都已有相當程度的發展。就四個向度而言,兩校特別在學校國際化政策及課程發展部分有良好的成果;而行政支持及計畫發展部分,則需要更多的資源及更完善的評量機制。此外,兩校分屬英語系及非英語系國家的不同語言文化脈絡,也形成其在課程國際化發展中面對不同的挑戰,如台灣因為非英語系國家而面臨的語言問題;以及美國作為英語系國家面臨的單一文化背景問題,如此差異性最終導致其課程國際化不同的發展路徑。
As the unstoppable trend of globalization, internationalization has become a core-developing issue in all higher education institution around the world. Among all those trends, internationalized curriculum has been brought into focus in recent years. This study attempts to compare the different developmental process of internationalized curriculum between English-speaking and non-English-speaking countries by using the cases of two research universities in the United States and Taiwan. Policy makers and faculty members will be interviewed based on The Best Practice Framework, including four major dimensions— university policy, regulation and administrative support, program development, and curriculum design. The use of instructional language in these courses will also be discussed as an important factor while comparing English-speaking and non-English-speaking contexts.
There are several findings in the study. First, both case universities have different levels of development in terms of internationalized curriculum according to the four dimensions. On one hand, two universities have clear policies over university internationalization and curriculum development; on the other hand, more resources and a well-developed evaluation system are needed when it comes to regulation and administrative support. Second, the issues of instructional language and cultural contexts have brought them different challenges. For example, Taiwan case encountered the paradox in the use of local and English instructional languages. In contrast, US case needed to managed the issue of homogeneity in culture. The challenges encountered by both cases respectively would lead to different paths for internationalized curriculum in their contexts.
參考文獻 中文部分
王俐淳。 (2019)。 培養國際移動力人才的一環─全英語授課之配套措施。臺灣
教育評論月刊,8(6),63-66。
王湘月(2019)。課程國際化在高等教育在地國際化角色之探討。台灣教育評論
月刊,8(3),112-120。
呂木琳、徐昌慧、馮莉雅(2014)。子計畫一:我國高等教育國際化基礎條件之
探究。國家教育研究院計畫(編號NAER-102-09-C-1-13-07-1-25),未出版。取自www.naer.edu.tw_ezfiles_0_1000_img_49_NAER-102-09-C-1-13-07-1-25
周宛青。 (2017)。高等教育國際化下台灣本籍生整體學習經驗質性研究。臺灣教
育評論月刊,6(4),228-254。
林俐。(2019)。國際教室在高等教育國際化之角色與挑戰。台灣教育評論月刊,
8(7),69-73。
姜麗娟。(2009)。國內高等教育課程國際化現況之調查研究。教育經營與管理
研究集刊,(5),1-40。
胡幼慧。(1996)。質性研究。台北:巨流出版社。
高教深耕計畫辦公室。(無日期)。校務發展與國際重點領域。取自:
http://topu.nccu.edu.tw/project/index/search/category/1
國立政治大學秘書處(2016)。國立政治大學第187次校務會議紀錄。取自:
http://secrt.nccu.edu.tw/Download.aspx?dir=Archive&file=EC-EC-45-73-67-6B-F1-EE-51-7F-B5-04-13-57-FA-75.pdf&filename=%E7%AC%AC187%E6%AC%A1%E6%A0%A1%E5%8B%99%E6%9C%83%E8%AD%B0&sn=19
國合處。(2020)。國際化統計。取自:
http://oic.nccu.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/3/20200518OICStat.pdf
國家教育研究院。(2000)。雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網-高等教育。取
自:http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1308939/
國家教育研究院。(2012)。雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網-比較研究。取
自:http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679273/
張佳琳。(2014年3月17日)。美國高等教育國際化趨勢,經營海外夥伴關係。
國際教育訊息電子報。取自:https://fepaper.naer.edu.tw/paper_view.php?edm_no=49&content_no=2619
教育部。(2001)。大學教育政策白皮書。取自:
https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/3/RelFile/6315/6936/90.07%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E7%99%BD%E7%9A%AE%E6%9B%B8.pdf
教育部。(2017)。高等教育深耕計畫(核定版)。取自:
https://ws.moe.edu.tw/Download.ashx?u=C099358C81D4876C725695F2070B467E436AA799542CD43D35E2178EAB5F04E50147AB9171DD14D803EB0B4BAE5E7BD5504C3631A49ED66BD0DE50CA588BCEE69FC86CD2D8824FA6E4E06747B83B575D&n=A2721D854CBE060095F48301B3EF6F6C7E742157486009A7EBB752EB255DA8701D25FE80475944F94B3AFC4950DC8F362623883E8B41216D&icon=..pdf
教育部。(2017)。教育部補助大專校院精進全英語學位學制班別計畫要點。取
自:https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000575
教育部統計處。(2018)。全球高等教育國際學生流動概況。取自:
http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/brief/%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E9%AB%98%E7%AD%89%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E6%B5%81%E5%8B%95%E6%A6%82%E6%B3%81.pdf
教育部統計處。(無日期)。大專校院境外學生概況。取自:
http://stats.moe.gov.tw/statedu/chart.aspx?pvalue=36
教學發展中心。(無日期)。英語授課。取自:
http://learning.nccu.edu.tw/zh-hant/node/38
陳向明。(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北:五南。
陳佩英、陳舜芬。(2006)。美國高等教育的國際化。教育資料與研究雙月刊,
71,109-132。
馮克芸。(2019年4月3日)。美媒:美國高教國際化難逃膚淺、盛況不再。聯
合新聞網。取自:https://udn.com/news/story/6813/3734656
馮紹恩。(2017年7月11日)。高教改革勢在必行,8成大學校長希望教育部
鬆綁。風向新聞。取自:https://kairos.news/77897
維基百科(無日期)英語國家和地區列表。取自:
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%8B%B1%E8%AF%AD%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%B6%E5%92%8C%E5%9C%B0%E5%8C%BA%E5%88%97%E8%A1%A8
遠見。(2018)。2018台灣最佳大學排行榜-五大面向排名。取自:
https://gvsrc.cwgv.com.tw/articles/index/14186/1
劉文琳。(2020年1月10日)。【第207次校務會議】打造國際跨領域學習校
園,千萬送學生出國交換。政治大學校訊。取自:https://www.nccu.edu.tw/p/406-1000-7103,r17.php?Lang=zh-tw
羅雅芬。(2010)。從高等教育國際化的觀點探討以英語授課的挑戰。高雄應用
科技大學學報,39。
C校。(2013)。獎助開設交換生英語授課課程要點。取自:
http://oic.nccu.edu.tw/data/ETP_exchange_chi.pdf
C校。(2018)。英語授課課程補助辦法。取自:
http://aca.nccu.edu.tw/download/rulesdata/law56A.pdf
Ke Chun Chu。(2015)。全英語授課現況、挑戰與未來。English Career,50。取
自:http://www.geat.org.tw/english-career/50/%E5%85%A8%E8%8B%B1%E8%AA%9E%E6%8E%88%E8%AA%B2-%E7%8F%BE%E6%B3%81%E3%80%81%E6%8C%91%E6%88%B0%E8%88%87%E6%9C%AA%E4%BE%86/




英文部分
ACE. (2012). Mapping Internationalization on US Campuses: 2012 Edition.
Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Retrieved from: https://www.acenet.edu/Documents/Mapping-Internationalizationon-US-Campuses-2012-full.pdf
ACE. (2017). Mapping internationalization on US campuses: 2017 edition.
Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Retrieved from: https://www.acenet.edu/Documents/Mapping-Internationalization-2017.pdf
APLU. (2018). Award Winners-2018 Award Recipients. Retrieved from:
https://www.aplu.org/projects-and-initiatives/international-programs/institutional-award-for-global-learning-research-and-engagement/previous-winners.html
Altbach, P. (2002). Perspectives on internationalizing higher education. International
Higher Education, (27).
Altbach, P.G.& de Wit, H. (2018, Feb 23). The Challenge to Higher Education
Internationalisation. University World News. Retrieved from: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20180220091648602
Beelen, J., & Jones, E. (2015). Redefining internationalization at home. In A. Curai,
L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi & P. Scott (Eds.), The European higher education area: Between critical reflections and future policies (pp. 59-72). Dordrecht: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0
Bikos, L. H., DePaul Chism, N. F., Forman, R. L., & King, D. R. (2013).
Internationalizing the US undergraduate psychology curriculum: A qualitative investigation of faculty perspectives. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 2(2), 116.
Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing
and conducting indepth
Calderon, A. (2012). High Education in 2035: The ongoing Massification. Retrieved
from https://www.academia.edu/2612867/High_Education_in_2035_The_Ongoing_Massification
Chang, S. Y. (2019). Beyond the English Box: Constructing and Communicating
Knowledge Through Translingual Practices in the Higher Education Classroom. English Teaching & Learning, 43(1), 23-40.
Center for Teaching Excellence. (2019) Globalizing Your Course. Retrieved from:
https://www.sc.edu/about/offices_and_divisions/cte/grants/calls_for_proposals/cfp_global_learning_spring2019.php
Coryell, J. E., Durodoye, B. A., Wright, R. R., Pate, P. E., & Nguyen, S. (2012). Case
studies of internationalization in adult and higher education: Inside the processes of four universities in the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of Studies in International Education, 16(1), 75-98.
de Wit, H. (2014). The different faces and phases of internationalisation of higher
education. In The forefront of international higher education (pp. 89-99). Springer, Dordrecht.
de Wit, H., & Leask, B. (2017). Global: internationalization, the curriculum, and the
disciplines. In Understanding Higher Education Internationalization (pp. 345-347). SensePublishers, Rotterdam.
de Wit, J. W. M. (2002). Internationalisation of Higher Education in the United
States of America and Europe. Amsterdam: in eigen beheer.
Foskett, N. (2010). Global markets, national challenges, local strategies: The strategic
challenge of internationalization. In F. Maringe & N. Foskett (Eds.), Globalization and internationalization in higher education (pp. 101-124). London: Continuum.
Hayward, F. M., & Siaya, L. M. (2001). Public experience, attitudes, and knowledge:
A report on two national surveys about international education.
Helms R. M. (n.d.) Internationalization in Action: Internationalizing the Curriculum.
American Council on Education. Retrieved from: https://www.acenet.edu/Research-Insights/Pages/Internationalization/Intlz-in-Action-2013-December.aspx
Huang, F. (2006). Internationalization of curricula in higher education institutions in
comparative perspectives: Case studies of China, Japan and the Netherlands. Higher Education, 51(4), 521-539.
International Student Services. (2018). International Student Enrollment Report.
Retrieved from: https://www.sc.edu/about/offices_and_divisions/international_student_services/documents/demoreport2018-updated.pdf
Knight, J. (1994). Internationalization: Elements and Checkpoints. CBIE Research
No. 7. Canadian Bureau for International Education (CBIE)/Bureau canadien de l’éducation internationale (BCEI). 220 Laurier Avenue West, Suite 1550, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5Z9.
Knight, J. (2006). Internationalization of higher education: New directions, new
challenges. Paris: IAU.
Knight, J. (2008). Higher education in Turmoil. The changing world of
internationalization. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Knight, J. (2014). Is internationalisation of higher education having an identity crisis?
In The forefront of international higher education (pp. 75-87). Springer, Dordrecht.
Knight, J. (2015). Updated Definition of Internationalization. International Higher
Education, (33). https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2003.33.7391
Leask, B. (2015). Internationalizing the curriculum. London: Routledge.
Leask, B. (2013). Internationalizing the curriculum in the disciplines—Imagining new
possibilities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(2), 103-118.
OECD (2019), Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing,
Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en.
OECD. (1996). Internationalizing the curriculum in higher education. Paris: Author.
OECD. (2018a) PISA 2018 Global Competence. Retrieved from:
https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2018-global-competence.htm
OECD. (2018b). Education at a Glance 2018: OECD Indicators, Mobility patterns of
foreign and international students (2016). Retrieved from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2018_eag-2018-en
Office of the Provost. (2014). Innovation in Global Engagement. Retrieved from:
https://www.google.com/url?client=internal-element-cse&cx=013416120310277204335:wk85hzl5qdq&q=https://www.sc.edu/about/offices_and_divisions/provost/docs/provostmeetings/2014fall-miller-globalcarolina.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwixkqODy_npAhUCy4sBHcJYAMcQFjAJegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw0bY9zuzHW5d2-bUzZnVRjE
Redden, E. (2019, May 30). National Policies and Internationalization. Inside Higher
ED. Retrieved from: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/05/30/research-focuses-national-policies-supporting-internationalization-higher-education
Study Abroad Office. (n.d.) Study Abroad Office. Retrieved from:
https://www.sc.edu/about/offices_and_divisions/study_abroad/about/news/2020/study_abroad_our_story.php
The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education (n.d.). Basic
Classification Description. Retrieved from: https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/classification_descriptions/basic.php
Trow, M. (1974). Problem in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education.
Policy for Higher Education. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED091983
Trow, M. (1999). From mass higher education to universal access: The American
advantage. Minerva, 303-328.
U.S. Department of Education. (2018). Succeeding Globally Through International
Education and Engagement. Retrieved from: https://sites.ed.gov/international/files/2018/11/Succeeding-Globally-Through-International-Education-and-Engagement-Update-2018.pdf
Van der Wende, M. (1996). Internationalizing the curriculum in higher education.
Tertiary Education and Management, 2(2), 186-195.
Weimer, L. (2017). 10 trends: transformative changes in higher education. London:
British Council.
Whalley, T. R., Langley, L., & Villarreal, L. (1997). Best practice guidelines for
internationalizing the curriculum. The Ministry. Retrieved from: http://www.llbc.leg.bc.ca/public/pubdocs/bcdocs2014/318118/best_practice_guidelines.pdf
Walkinshaw, I., Fenton-Smith, B., & Humphreys, P. (2017). EMI issues and challenges
in Asia-Pacific higher education: An introduction. In English Medium Instruction in Higher Education in Asia-Pacific (pp. 1-18). Springer, Cham.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育學系
107152005
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107152005
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 侯永琪zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 林俐zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Lin, Lien_US
dc.creator (作者) 林俐zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lin, Lien_US
dc.date (日期) 2020en_US
dc.date.accessioned 3-八月-2020 18:23:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 3-八月-2020 18:23:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-八月-2020 18:23:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0107152005en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131248-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 107152005zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在全球化的強烈衝擊下,國際化成為各個高等教育機構最重視的發展項目之一,其中課程的國際化更在近年逐漸受到重視。此篇研究將探討英語系與非英語系國家在高等教育課程國際化治理上的發展,以美國與台灣兩所大學作為主要研究對象,由政策執行者及教師的角度出發,了解兩校在課程國際化中四個向度:學校國際化政策、行政支援、計畫發展與課程發展的現況及異同。此外,由於研究對象分別來自英語系與非英語系國家,此篇研究也將特別探討授課語言(英語)在課程國際化所扮演的角色及其所帶來的影響。藉由探討以上五個向度,期望深入了解兩個學校所屬的框架背景,並進行分析討論。研究結果發現兩校在課程國際化方面都已有相當程度的發展。就四個向度而言,兩校特別在學校國際化政策及課程發展部分有良好的成果;而行政支持及計畫發展部分,則需要更多的資源及更完善的評量機制。此外,兩校分屬英語系及非英語系國家的不同語言文化脈絡,也形成其在課程國際化發展中面對不同的挑戰,如台灣因為非英語系國家而面臨的語言問題;以及美國作為英語系國家面臨的單一文化背景問題,如此差異性最終導致其課程國際化不同的發展路徑。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) As the unstoppable trend of globalization, internationalization has become a core-developing issue in all higher education institution around the world. Among all those trends, internationalized curriculum has been brought into focus in recent years. This study attempts to compare the different developmental process of internationalized curriculum between English-speaking and non-English-speaking countries by using the cases of two research universities in the United States and Taiwan. Policy makers and faculty members will be interviewed based on The Best Practice Framework, including four major dimensions— university policy, regulation and administrative support, program development, and curriculum design. The use of instructional language in these courses will also be discussed as an important factor while comparing English-speaking and non-English-speaking contexts.
There are several findings in the study. First, both case universities have different levels of development in terms of internationalized curriculum according to the four dimensions. On one hand, two universities have clear policies over university internationalization and curriculum development; on the other hand, more resources and a well-developed evaluation system are needed when it comes to regulation and administrative support. Second, the issues of instructional language and cultural contexts have brought them different challenges. For example, Taiwan case encountered the paradox in the use of local and English instructional languages. In contrast, US case needed to managed the issue of homogeneity in culture. The challenges encountered by both cases respectively would lead to different paths for internationalized curriculum in their contexts.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 4
第三節 研究目的及待答問題 6
第四節 名詞釋義 7
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 高等教育國際化 8
第二節 高等教育學生流動與課程國際化 13
第三節 美國之高等教育國際化及課程國際化政策 24
第四節 台灣高等教育課程國際化與英語的角色 31
第三章 研究設計與實施 39
第一節 研究架構 39
第二節 研究對象與取樣方法 40
第三節 研究方法 44
第四節 研究步驟 46
第五節 研究工具 47
第六節 資料處理 48
第七節 研究倫理 49
第四章 結果與討論 50
第一節 美國S大學課程國際化觀點分析 50
第二節 台灣C大學課程國際化觀點分析 63
第三節 英語系與非英語系國家脈絡下兩所學校之比較 76
第五章 結論與建議 87
第一節 研究結論 87
第二節 研究建議 90
參考資料 94
附錄 99
附錄一 英文訪談同意書 99
附錄二 中文訪談同意書 100
附錄三 訪談大綱-教師(美國) 101
附錄四 訪談大綱-政策執行者(美國) 102
附錄五 訪談大綱-教師(台灣) 103
附錄六 訪談大綱-政策執行者(台灣) 104
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 7070713 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107152005en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 課程國際化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國際化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 高等教育zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 美國zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 台灣zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Internationalized curriculumen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Internationalizationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Higher educationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) United Statesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Taiwanen_US
dc.title (題名) 英語系與非英語系國家高等教育課程國際化治理之比較—以美國與台灣之大學為例zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A Comparative Study on Internationalized Curriculum Governance in Higher Education between English-speaking and Non-English-speaking Countries— Cases from one United States’ and one Taiwan’s Universityen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分
王俐淳。 (2019)。 培養國際移動力人才的一環─全英語授課之配套措施。臺灣
教育評論月刊,8(6),63-66。
王湘月(2019)。課程國際化在高等教育在地國際化角色之探討。台灣教育評論
月刊,8(3),112-120。
呂木琳、徐昌慧、馮莉雅(2014)。子計畫一:我國高等教育國際化基礎條件之
探究。國家教育研究院計畫(編號NAER-102-09-C-1-13-07-1-25),未出版。取自www.naer.edu.tw_ezfiles_0_1000_img_49_NAER-102-09-C-1-13-07-1-25
周宛青。 (2017)。高等教育國際化下台灣本籍生整體學習經驗質性研究。臺灣教
育評論月刊,6(4),228-254。
林俐。(2019)。國際教室在高等教育國際化之角色與挑戰。台灣教育評論月刊,
8(7),69-73。
姜麗娟。(2009)。國內高等教育課程國際化現況之調查研究。教育經營與管理
研究集刊,(5),1-40。
胡幼慧。(1996)。質性研究。台北:巨流出版社。
高教深耕計畫辦公室。(無日期)。校務發展與國際重點領域。取自:
http://topu.nccu.edu.tw/project/index/search/category/1
國立政治大學秘書處(2016)。國立政治大學第187次校務會議紀錄。取自:
http://secrt.nccu.edu.tw/Download.aspx?dir=Archive&file=EC-EC-45-73-67-6B-F1-EE-51-7F-B5-04-13-57-FA-75.pdf&filename=%E7%AC%AC187%E6%AC%A1%E6%A0%A1%E5%8B%99%E6%9C%83%E8%AD%B0&sn=19
國合處。(2020)。國際化統計。取自:
http://oic.nccu.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/3/20200518OICStat.pdf
國家教育研究院。(2000)。雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網-高等教育。取
自:http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1308939/
國家教育研究院。(2012)。雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網-比較研究。取
自:http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679273/
張佳琳。(2014年3月17日)。美國高等教育國際化趨勢,經營海外夥伴關係。
國際教育訊息電子報。取自:https://fepaper.naer.edu.tw/paper_view.php?edm_no=49&content_no=2619
教育部。(2001)。大學教育政策白皮書。取自:
https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/3/RelFile/6315/6936/90.07%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E7%99%BD%E7%9A%AE%E6%9B%B8.pdf
教育部。(2017)。高等教育深耕計畫(核定版)。取自:
https://ws.moe.edu.tw/Download.ashx?u=C099358C81D4876C725695F2070B467E436AA799542CD43D35E2178EAB5F04E50147AB9171DD14D803EB0B4BAE5E7BD5504C3631A49ED66BD0DE50CA588BCEE69FC86CD2D8824FA6E4E06747B83B575D&n=A2721D854CBE060095F48301B3EF6F6C7E742157486009A7EBB752EB255DA8701D25FE80475944F94B3AFC4950DC8F362623883E8B41216D&icon=..pdf
教育部。(2017)。教育部補助大專校院精進全英語學位學制班別計畫要點。取
自:https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000575
教育部統計處。(2018)。全球高等教育國際學生流動概況。取自:
http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/brief/%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E9%AB%98%E7%AD%89%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E6%B5%81%E5%8B%95%E6%A6%82%E6%B3%81.pdf
教育部統計處。(無日期)。大專校院境外學生概況。取自:
http://stats.moe.gov.tw/statedu/chart.aspx?pvalue=36
教學發展中心。(無日期)。英語授課。取自:
http://learning.nccu.edu.tw/zh-hant/node/38
陳向明。(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北:五南。
陳佩英、陳舜芬。(2006)。美國高等教育的國際化。教育資料與研究雙月刊,
71,109-132。
馮克芸。(2019年4月3日)。美媒:美國高教國際化難逃膚淺、盛況不再。聯
合新聞網。取自:https://udn.com/news/story/6813/3734656
馮紹恩。(2017年7月11日)。高教改革勢在必行,8成大學校長希望教育部
鬆綁。風向新聞。取自:https://kairos.news/77897
維基百科(無日期)英語國家和地區列表。取自:
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%8B%B1%E8%AF%AD%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%B6%E5%92%8C%E5%9C%B0%E5%8C%BA%E5%88%97%E8%A1%A8
遠見。(2018)。2018台灣最佳大學排行榜-五大面向排名。取自:
https://gvsrc.cwgv.com.tw/articles/index/14186/1
劉文琳。(2020年1月10日)。【第207次校務會議】打造國際跨領域學習校
園,千萬送學生出國交換。政治大學校訊。取自:https://www.nccu.edu.tw/p/406-1000-7103,r17.php?Lang=zh-tw
羅雅芬。(2010)。從高等教育國際化的觀點探討以英語授課的挑戰。高雄應用
科技大學學報,39。
C校。(2013)。獎助開設交換生英語授課課程要點。取自:
http://oic.nccu.edu.tw/data/ETP_exchange_chi.pdf
C校。(2018)。英語授課課程補助辦法。取自:
http://aca.nccu.edu.tw/download/rulesdata/law56A.pdf
Ke Chun Chu。(2015)。全英語授課現況、挑戰與未來。English Career,50。取
自:http://www.geat.org.tw/english-career/50/%E5%85%A8%E8%8B%B1%E8%AA%9E%E6%8E%88%E8%AA%B2-%E7%8F%BE%E6%B3%81%E3%80%81%E6%8C%91%E6%88%B0%E8%88%87%E6%9C%AA%E4%BE%86/




英文部分
ACE. (2012). Mapping Internationalization on US Campuses: 2012 Edition.
Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Retrieved from: https://www.acenet.edu/Documents/Mapping-Internationalizationon-US-Campuses-2012-full.pdf
ACE. (2017). Mapping internationalization on US campuses: 2017 edition.
Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Retrieved from: https://www.acenet.edu/Documents/Mapping-Internationalization-2017.pdf
APLU. (2018). Award Winners-2018 Award Recipients. Retrieved from:
https://www.aplu.org/projects-and-initiatives/international-programs/institutional-award-for-global-learning-research-and-engagement/previous-winners.html
Altbach, P. (2002). Perspectives on internationalizing higher education. International
Higher Education, (27).
Altbach, P.G.& de Wit, H. (2018, Feb 23). The Challenge to Higher Education
Internationalisation. University World News. Retrieved from: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20180220091648602
Beelen, J., & Jones, E. (2015). Redefining internationalization at home. In A. Curai,
L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi & P. Scott (Eds.), The European higher education area: Between critical reflections and future policies (pp. 59-72). Dordrecht: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0
Bikos, L. H., DePaul Chism, N. F., Forman, R. L., & King, D. R. (2013).
Internationalizing the US undergraduate psychology curriculum: A qualitative investigation of faculty perspectives. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 2(2), 116.
Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing
and conducting indepth
Calderon, A. (2012). High Education in 2035: The ongoing Massification. Retrieved
from https://www.academia.edu/2612867/High_Education_in_2035_The_Ongoing_Massification
Chang, S. Y. (2019). Beyond the English Box: Constructing and Communicating
Knowledge Through Translingual Practices in the Higher Education Classroom. English Teaching & Learning, 43(1), 23-40.
Center for Teaching Excellence. (2019) Globalizing Your Course. Retrieved from:
https://www.sc.edu/about/offices_and_divisions/cte/grants/calls_for_proposals/cfp_global_learning_spring2019.php
Coryell, J. E., Durodoye, B. A., Wright, R. R., Pate, P. E., & Nguyen, S. (2012). Case
studies of internationalization in adult and higher education: Inside the processes of four universities in the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of Studies in International Education, 16(1), 75-98.
de Wit, H. (2014). The different faces and phases of internationalisation of higher
education. In The forefront of international higher education (pp. 89-99). Springer, Dordrecht.
de Wit, H., & Leask, B. (2017). Global: internationalization, the curriculum, and the
disciplines. In Understanding Higher Education Internationalization (pp. 345-347). SensePublishers, Rotterdam.
de Wit, J. W. M. (2002). Internationalisation of Higher Education in the United
States of America and Europe. Amsterdam: in eigen beheer.
Foskett, N. (2010). Global markets, national challenges, local strategies: The strategic
challenge of internationalization. In F. Maringe & N. Foskett (Eds.), Globalization and internationalization in higher education (pp. 101-124). London: Continuum.
Hayward, F. M., & Siaya, L. M. (2001). Public experience, attitudes, and knowledge:
A report on two national surveys about international education.
Helms R. M. (n.d.) Internationalization in Action: Internationalizing the Curriculum.
American Council on Education. Retrieved from: https://www.acenet.edu/Research-Insights/Pages/Internationalization/Intlz-in-Action-2013-December.aspx
Huang, F. (2006). Internationalization of curricula in higher education institutions in
comparative perspectives: Case studies of China, Japan and the Netherlands. Higher Education, 51(4), 521-539.
International Student Services. (2018). International Student Enrollment Report.
Retrieved from: https://www.sc.edu/about/offices_and_divisions/international_student_services/documents/demoreport2018-updated.pdf
Knight, J. (1994). Internationalization: Elements and Checkpoints. CBIE Research
No. 7. Canadian Bureau for International Education (CBIE)/Bureau canadien de l’éducation internationale (BCEI). 220 Laurier Avenue West, Suite 1550, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5Z9.
Knight, J. (2006). Internationalization of higher education: New directions, new
challenges. Paris: IAU.
Knight, J. (2008). Higher education in Turmoil. The changing world of
internationalization. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Knight, J. (2014). Is internationalisation of higher education having an identity crisis?
In The forefront of international higher education (pp. 75-87). Springer, Dordrecht.
Knight, J. (2015). Updated Definition of Internationalization. International Higher
Education, (33). https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2003.33.7391
Leask, B. (2015). Internationalizing the curriculum. London: Routledge.
Leask, B. (2013). Internationalizing the curriculum in the disciplines—Imagining new
possibilities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(2), 103-118.
OECD (2019), Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing,
Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en.
OECD. (1996). Internationalizing the curriculum in higher education. Paris: Author.
OECD. (2018a) PISA 2018 Global Competence. Retrieved from:
https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2018-global-competence.htm
OECD. (2018b). Education at a Glance 2018: OECD Indicators, Mobility patterns of
foreign and international students (2016). Retrieved from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2018_eag-2018-en
Office of the Provost. (2014). Innovation in Global Engagement. Retrieved from:
https://www.google.com/url?client=internal-element-cse&cx=013416120310277204335:wk85hzl5qdq&q=https://www.sc.edu/about/offices_and_divisions/provost/docs/provostmeetings/2014fall-miller-globalcarolina.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwixkqODy_npAhUCy4sBHcJYAMcQFjAJegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw0bY9zuzHW5d2-bUzZnVRjE
Redden, E. (2019, May 30). National Policies and Internationalization. Inside Higher
ED. Retrieved from: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/05/30/research-focuses-national-policies-supporting-internationalization-higher-education
Study Abroad Office. (n.d.) Study Abroad Office. Retrieved from:
https://www.sc.edu/about/offices_and_divisions/study_abroad/about/news/2020/study_abroad_our_story.php
The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education (n.d.). Basic
Classification Description. Retrieved from: https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/classification_descriptions/basic.php
Trow, M. (1974). Problem in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education.
Policy for Higher Education. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED091983
Trow, M. (1999). From mass higher education to universal access: The American
advantage. Minerva, 303-328.
U.S. Department of Education. (2018). Succeeding Globally Through International
Education and Engagement. Retrieved from: https://sites.ed.gov/international/files/2018/11/Succeeding-Globally-Through-International-Education-and-Engagement-Update-2018.pdf
Van der Wende, M. (1996). Internationalizing the curriculum in higher education.
Tertiary Education and Management, 2(2), 186-195.
Weimer, L. (2017). 10 trends: transformative changes in higher education. London:
British Council.
Whalley, T. R., Langley, L., & Villarreal, L. (1997). Best practice guidelines for
internationalizing the curriculum. The Ministry. Retrieved from: http://www.llbc.leg.bc.ca/public/pubdocs/bcdocs2014/318118/best_practice_guidelines.pdf
Walkinshaw, I., Fenton-Smith, B., & Humphreys, P. (2017). EMI issues and challenges
in Asia-Pacific higher education: An introduction. In English Medium Instruction in Higher Education in Asia-Pacific (pp. 1-18). Springer, Cham.
zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202000867en_US