Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 轉大人過程中的愛情：成年初期社會身分的轉變與親密關係之維繫
Romantic Relationships in Emerging Adulthood: The Change of Social Roles and the Maintenance of Intimacy in Early Adulthood作者 黃軒
Huang, Hsuan貢獻者 胡力中
Hu, Li-Chung
黃軒
Huang, Hsuan關鍵詞 轉大人時期
社會身分
親密關係
生命歷程
臺灣九○後世代日期 2019 上傳時間 2-Sep-2020 12:44:29 (UTC+8) 摘要 當社會發展日漸富足，工業化國家不再急需年輕人盡早進入勞動力市場。且受人口結構變遷影響，婚育年齡被推遲，鬆綁了青少年直接進入成人角色的社會規範，並催生了得以恣意探索的「轉大人時期」。儘管過去研究指稱，轉大人時期是發展親密關係的重要階段，但此時也是社會身分頻繁更迭的時刻，包含離家求學、入伍從軍、投身職場等事件，未必利於延續關係發展。因此本文旨在探究轉大人時期歷經社會身分轉換後的親密關係，試圖了解伴侶中任一方社會身分轉換如何影響關係發展？雙方將採以何種方式維繫關係？ 本次研究對象為臺灣九○後世代青年，透過半結構式深度訪談，本研究結果發現：一、社會身分轉換確實會影響關係走向，亦會牽動個人自我認知、改變個人維繫方式。二、社會身分轉換是關係中的「轉捩點」，將加劇雙方歧異、稀釋情愛，也會重整關係發展、權力分佈，抑或催化關係進程、迫使雙方正視既存問題。三、當任一方邁入就業階段，維繫模式將從學生時期的「以量取勝」轉以「重質不重量」，並加重使用「社會網絡」穩固關係。四、性別角色態度、個人生命歷程等皆會影響維繫方式，且該世代面臨的各項不確定性因素，促使「佛系經營法」出現。五、該世代日漸重視「婚前探索」，延長了轉大人過程，但男性可探索時間仍較女性充裕。六、該世代婚育規劃呈現兩種圖像，部分青年體認執行計劃的窒礙難行，抑或不再視婚姻、生育為必要生命事件，因此以「隨緣」態度應對，反映該世代逐漸脫離標準化生命歷程常軌；部分青年則深受社會身分轉換影響，女性尤其意圖加快轉大人過程，企盼盡快進入下一個生命階段。儘管轉大人過程深受性別影響，但該世代的性別角色態度仍有式微之處。 參考文獻 中文專書Ansari, Aziz、Klinenberg, Eric著、洪惠美譯，2016，《救救我的羅曼史：破解已讀不回、舊愛不死、簡訊分手的愛情對策》。臺北：遠見天下文化。Bauman, Zygmunt 著、何定照、高瑟濡譯，2007，《液態之愛》。臺北：商周、城邦文化出版。Coontz, Stephanie著、秦傳安、王璠譯，2009，《婚姻簡史︰愛情怎麼征服了婚姻》。北京：中央編譯出版社。Elder, Jr. G. H.著、田禾、馬春華譯，2002，《大蕭條的孩子們》。南京：譯林。Giddens, Anthony著、周素鳳譯，2001，《親密關係的轉變：現代社會的性、愛、慾》。臺北：巨流。Jay, Meg著、胡琦君譯，2012，《20世代，你的人生是不是卡住了：你以為時間 還很多，但有些決定不能拖》。臺北：天下遠見。Jenkins, Richard著、王志弘、許妍飛譯，2006，《社會認同》。臺北：巨流。Slater, Dan著、楊路譯，2014，《數位世代的愛情：科技對交友與擇偶的影響》。臺中：五南圖書出版。Tapscott, Don著、羅耀宗、黃貝玲、蔡宏明譯，2009，《N世代衝撞：網路新人類正在改變你的世界》。臺北：美商麥格羅‧希爾。Turkle, Sherry著、洪世民譯，2017，《在一起孤獨：科技拉近了彼此距離，卻讓我們害怕親密交流？》。臺北：時報出版。石芳瑜，2012，《花轎、牛車、偉士牌：臺灣愛情四百年》。臺北：有鹿文化。伊慶春，1982，〈已婚職業婦女的雙重角色：期望、衝突與調適〉。《中央研究院三民主義研究所叢刊》(9)：405-430。吳承紘，2017，《厭世代－低薪、貧窮與看不見的未來》。臺北：月熊出版。吳清山，2008，《解讀臺灣教育改革》。臺北：心理出版。吳駿盛，2014，〈22K〉。頁53-77，收錄於丁允恭編，《島國關賤字：屬於我們這個世代、這個時代的臺灣社會力分析》。臺北：左岸文化。呂玉瑕、周玉慧，2015，〈二十一世紀臺灣青少年性別角色態度之形成與變遷〉。《臺灣社會學刊》(58): 95-155。李美玲、楊亞潔、伊慶春，2000，〈家務分工：就業現實還是平等理念？〉。《臺灣社會學刊》(24): 59-88。李素月、陳延昇，2015，〈偶像劇中愛情與性別角色的再現與迷思：以臺灣偶像劇的男女主角互動為例〉。《中華傳播學刊》(28): 157-196。林依伶、楊子霆，2018，〈經濟成長、薪資停滯？初探臺灣實質薪資與勞動生產力成長脫勾之成因〉。《經濟論文》46(2): 263-322。林宗弘、洪敬舒、李健鴻、王兆慶、張烽益，2011，《崩世代：財團化、貧窮化與少子女化的危機》。臺北：臺灣勞工陣線。林芳玫，2006，《解讀瓊瑤愛情王國》。臺北：臺灣商務。張思嘉、李雅雯，2009，〈擇偶歷程中影響關係發展的關鍵因素〉。《中華輔導與諮商學報》(25): 179-212。張思嘉、周玉慧，2004，〈緣與婚前關係的發展〉。《本土心理學研究》(21): 85-123。游美惠，2014，〈情感教育：仍待積極開展的研究領域與教學實踐〉。婦研縱橫101: 40-44。黃毅志、陳怡靖，2005，〈臺灣的升學問題：教育社會學理論與研究之檢討〉。《臺灣教育社會學研究》5(1): 77-118。楊文山，2008，〈年輕人為什麼不結婚：臺灣社會未來婚姻趨勢研究〉。《生命教育研究期刊》，177-207。高雄：圓照寺九華圖書社。趙彥寧，2010，〈不／可計量的親密關係：老t搬家三探〉。《臺灣社會研究季刊》(80): 3-56。劉正、李錦華，2001，〈文憑主義的迷思：從勞工的薪資及雇主的徵才談起〉。《臺灣教育社會學研究》1(2): 91-129。劉冠儀，2017，《「誰不希望好？」：第二代都市原住民男性的勞動生命流轉》。臺北：國立陽明大學衛生福利研究所碩士論文。鍾秉融、謝宏仁、鍾金原，2017，〈我還不想結婚：七位女性對於婚姻的共同想像〉。《國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報》13(3): 191-217。翁康容、謝雨生，2018，〈台灣民眾轉至成人發展歷程之類型與變遷〉。《台灣社會學》(36): 111-166.瞿宛文，2017，《臺灣戰後經濟發展的源起：後進發展的為何與如何》。臺北：聯經出版。藍佩嘉，2015，〈質性個案研究法：紮根理論與延伸個案法〉。頁63-96，收於瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞編，《社會及行為科學研究法：質性研究法》。臺北：東華書局。英文專書Allison, R., and Risman, B., 2014, “"It Goes Hand in Hand with the Parties": Race, Class, and Residence in College Student Negotiations of Hooking Up.” Sociological Perspectives 57(1): 102-123.Almeida, D., 2004, “Using daily diaries to assess temporal friction between work and family.” Pp. 127-136 in Work-Family Challenges for Low-Income Parents and their Children, edited by A. C. Crouter and A. Booth. Mahwah. NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Arnett, J. J., 1994, “Are College Students Adults? Their Conceptions of the Transition to Adulthood” Journal of Adult Development 1(4): 213-224 •Arnett, J. J., 2000, “Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.” American Psychologist 55(5): 469-480.Arnett, J. J., 2004, Emerging Adulthood: The Winding Road from the Late Teens Through the Twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.Arnett, J. J., 2007, “Emerging Adulthood: What Is It, and What Is It Good For? ” Child Development Perspectives 1: 68-73.Arnett, J. J., 2016, “College Students as Emerging Adults: The Developmental Implications of the College Context.” Emerging Adulthood 4(3): 219–222.Blumberg, R. L. and Coleman, M. T., 1989, “A Theoretical Look at the Gender Balance of Power in the American Couple.” Journal of Family Issues 10(2): 225–250.Buchmann, M., and Kriesi, I., 2009, “Escaping the gender trap: Young women’s transition into nontraditional occupations.” Pp. 193–215 in Transitions from school to work: Globalization, individualization, and patterns of diversity, edited by I. Schoon and R. K. Silbereisen. New York: Cambridge University.Buhl, Heike M., 2007, “Well-being and Child – Parent Relationship University to Work Life.” Journal of Adolescent Research 22(5): 550-571.Campbell, S.M., 1980, The Couple’s Journey: Intimacy as a Path to Wholeness. CA: Impact Publishers.Chapman, G., 1992, The five love languages: How to express heartfelt commitment to your mate. Chicago, IL: Northfield Publishing.Chelune, G. J., Robinson, J. T., Kommor, M. F., 1984, “A cognitive interactional model of intimate relationships.” Pp. 11-40 in Communication, Intimacy, and Close Relationships, edited by V. J. Derlega. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Cheng, Yen-Hsin, 2014, “Changing partner choice and marriage propensities by education in post-industrial Taiwan, 2000-2010.” Demographic Research 31: 1007-1042.Cohen, P., Kasen, S., Chen, H., Hartmark, C., and Gordon, K., 2003, “Variations in patterns of developmental transmissions in the emerging adulthood period.” Developmental Psychology 39 (4): 657-669.Cook, T. D., and Furstenberg Jr., F. F., 2002, “Explaining Aspects of the Transition to Adulthood in Italy, Sweden, Germany, and the United States: A Cross-Disciplinary, Case Synthesis Approach.” THE ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 580(1): 255-287.Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., and Howard, E., 2013,” Emerging in a Digital World: A Decade Review of Media Use, Effects, and Gratifications in Emerging Adulthood.” Emerging Adulthood 1(2): 125–137.Craig, L., and Brown, J., 2014, “Weekend work and leisure time with family and friends: Who misses out?” Journal of Marriage and Family 76(4): 710– 727.Crocetti, E., Tagliabue, S., Sugimura, K., Nelson, L. J., Takahashi, A., Niwa, T., Sugiura, Y. and Jinno, M., 2015, “Perceptions of Emerging Adulthood: A Study With Italian and Japanese University Students and Young Workers.” Emerging Adulthood 3(4): 229–243.Dainton, M., and Gross, J., 2008, “The use of negative behaviors to maintain relationships.” Communication Research Reports 25(3): 179-191.Dindia, K., and Canary, D. J., 1993, “Definitions and Theoretical Perspectives on Maintaining Relationships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 10(2): 163–173.Egbert, N., and Polk, D., 2006, “Speaking the language of relational maintenance: A validity test of Chapman’s (1992) five love languages.” Communication Research Reports 23(1):19-26.Elder, Jr. G. H., 1998, “The Life Course as Developmental Theory.” Child Development 69(1): 1-12.Erikson, E. H., 1968, Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.Furstenberg, F. F., Jr., Rumbaut, R. C., and Settersten, R. A., Jr., 2005, “On the Frontier of Adulthood: Emerging Themes and New Directions.” Pp. 3-25 in On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy, edited by R. A. Settersten, Jr., F. F. Furstenberg, Jr., and R. G. Rumbaut. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Giles, H., Reid, S. A., and Harwood, J., 2010, “Introducing the dynamics of intergroup communication.” Pp. 1-16 in The dynamics of intergroup communication, edited by H. Giles, S. Reid, and J. Harwood. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Hart, M., 2015, “Youth Intimacy on Tumblr: A Pilot Study.” YOUNG 23(3): 193–208.Hobbs, M., Owen, S., and Gerber, L., 2017,” Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy.” Journal of Sociology 53(2): 271–284.Hogg, M., Terry, D., and White, K., 1995,” A Tale of Two Theories: A Critical Comparison of Identity Theory with Social Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly 58(4): 255-269.Howe, N. and Strauss, W., 2000, Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. NY: Vintage Books.Huang, L.-W. W., 2013, “The Transition Tempo and Life Course Orientation of Young Adults in Taiwan.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 646(1): 69–85.Jamieson, L., 2011, “Intimacy as a Concept: Explaining Social Change in the Context of Globalisation or Another Form of Ethnocentricism?” Sociological Research Online 16(4): 1–13.Kao, Ying-Chao and Bih, Herng-Dar, 2014, “Masculinity in Ambiguity: Constructing Taiwanese Masculine Identities Between Great Powers.” Pp. 175-191 in Masculinities in a Global Era, edited by Joseph Gelfer. New York: Springer.Kim, J. L., Sorsoli, C. L., Collins, K., Zylbergold, B. A., Schooler, D., and Tolman, D. L., 2007, “From Sex to Sexuality: Exposing the Heterosexual Script on Primetime Network Television.” The Journal of Sex Research 44(2): 145-157.Lancaster, L. C. and Stillman, D., 2002, When Generations Collide. Who They Are. Why They Clash. How to Solve the Generational Puzzle at Work. New York: Collins Business.Lever, J., Frederick, D. A., and Hertz, R., 2015, “Who Pays for Dates? Following Versus Challenging Gender Norms.” SAGE Open 5(4): 1-14.Lewis, R. A., 1973, “A longitudinal test of a developmental framework for premarital dyadic formation.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 35(1): 16-25.Luyckx, K., Schwartz, S. J., Goossens, L., and Pollock, S., 2008, “Employment, sense of coherence, and identity formation: Contextual and psychological processes on the pathway to sense of adulthood.” Journal of Adolescent Research 23(5): 566-591.Maines, David R., and Hardesty, Monica J., 1987, “Temporality and Gender: Young Adults` Career and Family Plans.” Social Forces 66(1): 102–120.Mannheim, K., 1952. “The Problem of Generations.” Pp. 109-155 in Theories of Ethnicity: A Classical Reader, edited by W. Sollors. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Marcia, J. E., 1966, “Development and validation of ego-identity status.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 3(5): 551–558.Marshall, T. C., Bejanyan, K., Di Castro, G., and Lee, R. A., 2012, “Attachment styles as predcitors of Facebook-related jealousy and surveillance in romantic relationships.” Personal Relationships 20(1): 1–22.McClintock, E. A., 2014, “Beauty and Status: The Illusion of Exchange in Partner Selection?” American Sociological Review 79(4): 575–604.Modell, J., 1989, Into One`s Own: From Youth to Adulthood in the United States, 1920-1975. Berkeley: University of California Press.Oppenheimer, V., 2003, “Cohabiting and Marriage during Young Men`s Career-Development Process.” Demography 40(1): 127–149.Pierce, C.A., Byrne, D., & Aguinis, H., 1996, “Attraction in organizations: A model of workplace romance.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 17: 5–32.Pryor, J. H., Hurtado, S., Saenz, V. B., Santos, J. L., and Korn, W. S., 2007, The American freshman: Forty year trends. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute.Reiss, I. L., 1960, “Toward a sociology of the heterosexual love relationship.” Marriage and Family Living 22(2): 139–145.Rindfuss, R., 1991, “The Young Adult Years: Diversity, Structural Change, and Fertility.” Demography 28(4): 493–512.Robards, B., and Lincoln, S., 2016, “Making It “Facebook Official”: Reflecting on Romantic Relationships Through Sustained Facebook Use.” Social Media + Society 2(4): 1–10.Ryder, N. B., 1965. “The Cohort as a Concept in the Study of Social Change.” American Sociological Review 30(6): 843–861.Schwartz, S. J., 2016, “Turning Point for a Turning Point: Advancing Emerging Adulthood Theory and Research.” Emerging Adulthood 4(5): 307–317.Seabrook, R. C., Ward, L. M., Reed, L., Manago, A., Giaccardi, S., and Lippman, J. R., 2016, “Our Scripted Sexuality: The Development and Validation of a Measure of the Heterosexual Script and Its Relation to Television Consumption.” Emerging Adulthood 4(5): 338–355.Shanahan, M., 2000, “Pathways to Adulthood in Changing Societies: Variability and Mechanisms in Life Course Perspective.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 667-692.Shulman, S., and Connolly, J., 2013, “The Challenge of Romantic Relationships in Emerging Adulthood: Reconceptualization of the Field” Emerging Adulthood 1(1): 27-39.Shulman, S., Hakhmigari, M. K., Michaeli, Y., Tuval-Mashiach, R., and Dickson, D. J., 2016, “Achieving Work and Love Authorship in Emerging Adulthood: Types, Psychosocial Correlations, and Precursors.” Emerging Adulthood 4(4): 258–271.Stafford, L., and Canary, D. J., 1991, “Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 8(2): 217-242.Stafford, L., Dainton, M., and Haas, S. M., 2000, “Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and prediction of relational characteristics.” Communication Monographs 67(3): 306-323.Sternberg, Robert J., 1986, “A triangular theory of love.” Psychological Review 93(2): 119-135.Sunstein, C. R., 1996, “Social norms and social roles”. Columbia law review 96(4): 903-968.Tajfel, H., 1974, “Social identity and intergroup behavior.” Social Science Information 13(2): 65–93.Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C., 1986, “The Social Identity Theory of Inter-Group Behavior,” in Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by Stephen Worchel and William G. Austin. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Tajfel, H., and Turner, J., 1979, “An integrative theory of intergroup conflict.” Pp. 33-47 in The social psychology of intergroup relations, edited by W. Austin and S. Worchel. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Takeuchi, M., and Tsutsui, J., 2016, “Combining egalitarian working lives with traditional attitudes: Gender role attitudes in Taiwan, Japan, and Korea.” International Journal of Japanese Sociology 25(1): 100–116.Vignoles, V. L., Schwartz, S. J., and Luyckx, K., 2011, “Introduction: Toward an integrative view of identity.” Pp. 1-28 in Handbook of identity theory and research, edited by S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, and V. L. Vignoles. New York: Springer.Waring, E.M., Tillman, M.H., Frelick, L.F., Russell, L.K., and Weisz, G.M., 1980, “Concepts of intimacy in the general population.” The Journal of nervous and mental disease 168(8): 471-474.Yoder, A. E., 2000, “Barriers to ego identity status formation: A contextual clarification of Marcia’s identity status paradigm.” Journal of Adolescence 23(1): 95-106.網路資料全國法規資料庫，2020，勞動基準法。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=N0030001，取用日期：2020年8月14日。呂蓓君、葉俊宏，2018，〈佛系青年低慾望不強求 年輕世代困境縮影〉。TVBS，5月16日。https://news.tvbs.com.tw/local/921143，取用日期：2020年1月18日。役政署，2019，服役須知。https://www.nca.gov.tw/chaspx/Faq_Detail.aspx?web=84&id=10502，取用日期：2019年12月22日。李念庭，2018，〈「佛系青年」崛起：是豁達還逃避？年輕世代困境真相〉。https://www.cheers.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5088018&page=2，取用日期：2020年1月18日。海軍軍官學校，官校生活的一天。 https://www.cna.edu.tw/tw/Life.php?progId=LIF003，取用日期：2020年8月17日。張錦弘，2017，〈指考38分可填志願…遙想當年聯考 380分只能吊車尾〉。聯合報，8月9日。https://udn.com/news/story/6925/2631580，取用日期：2020年2月15日。張瀞文，2013，〈談戀愛記大過 中學校規問題多〉。https://anntw.com/articles/20131119-E9yZ，取用日期：2019年9月13日。教育部，2019，全國大專校院校數。https://ulist.moe.gov.tw/Browse/UniversityList，取用日期：2020年1月21日。教育部臺灣閩南語常用詞辭典，2011，轉大人。https://twblg.dict.edu.tw/holodict_new/result_detail.jsp?n_no=12658&source=9&level1=9&level2=39&level3=0&curpage=0&sample=0&radiobutton=0&querytarget=0&limit=1&pagenum=0&rowcount=0&cattype=1，取用日期：2020年1月5日。統計處，2016，如何計算在學率？https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/News_Content.aspx?n=780B4CFF8FB1916B&sms=23D255462E62FBCD&s=D6DF2921B0091791，取用日期：2019年12月19日。統計處，2018，大學校院新生錄取人數及錄取率。http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/important/OVERVIEW_U10.pdf，取用日期：2019年8月20日。統計處，2019，教育統計查詢網。https://stats.moe.gov.tw/qframe.aspx?qno=MgA3AA2，取用日期：2019年12月19日。網路溫度計時事網路大數據分析，2018，〈「如果緣份到了。。。」網瘋傳17張佛系圖你中了哪些〉。https://dailyview.tw/popular/detail/1656，取用日期：2020年1月18日。劉嘉韻、蔡永彬、陳威廷，2014，〈「勒令轉學」 恐龍校規須廢止〉。https://tw.appledaily.com/headline/daily/20140507/35814155/，取用日期：2019年9月13日。Dcard，2015，〈什麼是抽卡？〉。https://faq.dcard.tw/66，取引用日期：2019年12月1日。Esther Perel，2013，The secret to desire in a long-term relationship。 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sa0RUmGTCYY，取用日期：2019年5月28日。Human Pictogram 2.0，http://pictogram2.com/?lang=en，取用日期：2019年12月26日。 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
社會學系
106254011資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106254011 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 胡力中 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Hu, Li-Chung en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 黃軒 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Huang, Hsuan en_US dc.creator (作者) 黃軒 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Huang, Hsuan en_US dc.date (日期) 2019 en_US dc.date.accessioned 2-Sep-2020 12:44:29 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 2-Sep-2020 12:44:29 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Sep-2020 12:44:29 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0106254011 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131778 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 社會學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 106254011 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 當社會發展日漸富足，工業化國家不再急需年輕人盡早進入勞動力市場。且受人口結構變遷影響，婚育年齡被推遲，鬆綁了青少年直接進入成人角色的社會規範，並催生了得以恣意探索的「轉大人時期」。儘管過去研究指稱，轉大人時期是發展親密關係的重要階段，但此時也是社會身分頻繁更迭的時刻，包含離家求學、入伍從軍、投身職場等事件，未必利於延續關係發展。因此本文旨在探究轉大人時期歷經社會身分轉換後的親密關係，試圖了解伴侶中任一方社會身分轉換如何影響關係發展？雙方將採以何種方式維繫關係？ 本次研究對象為臺灣九○後世代青年，透過半結構式深度訪談，本研究結果發現：一、社會身分轉換確實會影響關係走向，亦會牽動個人自我認知、改變個人維繫方式。二、社會身分轉換是關係中的「轉捩點」，將加劇雙方歧異、稀釋情愛，也會重整關係發展、權力分佈，抑或催化關係進程、迫使雙方正視既存問題。三、當任一方邁入就業階段，維繫模式將從學生時期的「以量取勝」轉以「重質不重量」，並加重使用「社會網絡」穩固關係。四、性別角色態度、個人生命歷程等皆會影響維繫方式，且該世代面臨的各項不確定性因素，促使「佛系經營法」出現。五、該世代日漸重視「婚前探索」，延長了轉大人過程，但男性可探索時間仍較女性充裕。六、該世代婚育規劃呈現兩種圖像，部分青年體認執行計劃的窒礙難行，抑或不再視婚姻、生育為必要生命事件，因此以「隨緣」態度應對，反映該世代逐漸脫離標準化生命歷程常軌；部分青年則深受社會身分轉換影響，女性尤其意圖加快轉大人過程，企盼盡快進入下一個生命階段。儘管轉大人過程深受性別影響，但該世代的性別角色態度仍有式微之處。 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章、緒論 9第一節、研究背景與動機 9第二節、研究目的與問題 11第三節、研究重要性 13第四節、名詞釋義 14第二章、文獻回顧 15第一節、轉大人時期理論（Emerging Adulthood） 15第二節、生命歷程與臺灣九○後世代 18（一）生命歷程理論（Life Course Theory） 18（二）他們是什麼樣的一群人？――臺灣九○後世代之特性 20第三節、社會身分的相關理論 24（一）社會認同理論（Social Identity Theory） 24（二）性別角色 25第四節、社會身分的相關研究 27第五節、親密關係意涵與關係維繫之相關研究 29（一）親密關係之意涵 29（二）親密關係之歷程階段 31（三）親密關係之相關研究 33（四）關係維繫之意涵與行為策略 34第三章、研究設計與操作 37第一節、研究方法 37第二節、研究對象與抽樣 38第三節、受訪者基本資料 41第四章、親密關係的開展 45第一節、直到我們邂逅：親密關係的萌生與過程 45第二節、離家後的投身愛情：轉大人時期的尋覓伴侶 52第三節、「感覺」引進門，修行在個人：轉大人時期的網路交友 55小結 58第五章、社會身分的更迭 59第一節、過關斬將也要看階段：身分轉換時機對關係發展之影響 59第二節、都是作息吞噬了愛情：出社會作息對親密關係之影響 67第三節、幫你付錢成了我的義務？――出社會先後的性別角色建構 75第四節、談愛之餘，也不忘權力爭奪：出社會後親密關係中的角力 80小結 87第六章、親密關係的維繫 88第一節、時間在走，愛也要變：身分轉換前後的愛情與維繫方式 88第二節、我的愛，不是我說的算：家庭逆境對個人生命歷程之影響 99第三節、跟我走，或是跟你／妳走？――職涯發展當中的性別角色 105第四節、倒數計時抑或計時開始？――轉大人時期的預期進入婚姻 111第五節、「緣分到了，自然…」：臺灣九○後世代的「佛系經營法」 117小結 124第七章、結論與討論 125第一節、研究結論 125第二節、研究限制與建議 130參考文獻 132 zh_TW dc.format.extent 6320391 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106254011 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 轉大人時期 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會身分 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 親密關係 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 生命歷程 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 臺灣九○後世代 zh_TW dc.title (題名) 轉大人過程中的愛情：成年初期社會身分的轉變與親密關係之維繫 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Romantic Relationships in Emerging Adulthood: The Change of Social Roles and the Maintenance of Intimacy in Early Adulthood en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文專書Ansari, Aziz、Klinenberg, Eric著、洪惠美譯，2016，《救救我的羅曼史：破解已讀不回、舊愛不死、簡訊分手的愛情對策》。臺北：遠見天下文化。Bauman, Zygmunt 著、何定照、高瑟濡譯，2007，《液態之愛》。臺北：商周、城邦文化出版。Coontz, Stephanie著、秦傳安、王璠譯，2009，《婚姻簡史︰愛情怎麼征服了婚姻》。北京：中央編譯出版社。Elder, Jr. G. H.著、田禾、馬春華譯，2002，《大蕭條的孩子們》。南京：譯林。Giddens, Anthony著、周素鳳譯，2001，《親密關係的轉變：現代社會的性、愛、慾》。臺北：巨流。Jay, Meg著、胡琦君譯，2012，《20世代，你的人生是不是卡住了：你以為時間 還很多，但有些決定不能拖》。臺北：天下遠見。Jenkins, Richard著、王志弘、許妍飛譯，2006，《社會認同》。臺北：巨流。Slater, Dan著、楊路譯，2014，《數位世代的愛情：科技對交友與擇偶的影響》。臺中：五南圖書出版。Tapscott, Don著、羅耀宗、黃貝玲、蔡宏明譯，2009，《N世代衝撞：網路新人類正在改變你的世界》。臺北：美商麥格羅‧希爾。Turkle, Sherry著、洪世民譯，2017，《在一起孤獨：科技拉近了彼此距離，卻讓我們害怕親密交流？》。臺北：時報出版。石芳瑜，2012，《花轎、牛車、偉士牌：臺灣愛情四百年》。臺北：有鹿文化。伊慶春，1982，〈已婚職業婦女的雙重角色：期望、衝突與調適〉。《中央研究院三民主義研究所叢刊》(9)：405-430。吳承紘，2017，《厭世代－低薪、貧窮與看不見的未來》。臺北：月熊出版。吳清山，2008，《解讀臺灣教育改革》。臺北：心理出版。吳駿盛，2014，〈22K〉。頁53-77，收錄於丁允恭編，《島國關賤字：屬於我們這個世代、這個時代的臺灣社會力分析》。臺北：左岸文化。呂玉瑕、周玉慧，2015，〈二十一世紀臺灣青少年性別角色態度之形成與變遷〉。《臺灣社會學刊》(58): 95-155。李美玲、楊亞潔、伊慶春，2000，〈家務分工：就業現實還是平等理念？〉。《臺灣社會學刊》(24): 59-88。李素月、陳延昇，2015，〈偶像劇中愛情與性別角色的再現與迷思：以臺灣偶像劇的男女主角互動為例〉。《中華傳播學刊》(28): 157-196。林依伶、楊子霆，2018，〈經濟成長、薪資停滯？初探臺灣實質薪資與勞動生產力成長脫勾之成因〉。《經濟論文》46(2): 263-322。林宗弘、洪敬舒、李健鴻、王兆慶、張烽益，2011，《崩世代：財團化、貧窮化與少子女化的危機》。臺北：臺灣勞工陣線。林芳玫，2006，《解讀瓊瑤愛情王國》。臺北：臺灣商務。張思嘉、李雅雯，2009，〈擇偶歷程中影響關係發展的關鍵因素〉。《中華輔導與諮商學報》(25): 179-212。張思嘉、周玉慧，2004，〈緣與婚前關係的發展〉。《本土心理學研究》(21): 85-123。游美惠，2014，〈情感教育：仍待積極開展的研究領域與教學實踐〉。婦研縱橫101: 40-44。黃毅志、陳怡靖，2005，〈臺灣的升學問題：教育社會學理論與研究之檢討〉。《臺灣教育社會學研究》5(1): 77-118。楊文山，2008，〈年輕人為什麼不結婚：臺灣社會未來婚姻趨勢研究〉。《生命教育研究期刊》，177-207。高雄：圓照寺九華圖書社。趙彥寧，2010，〈不／可計量的親密關係：老t搬家三探〉。《臺灣社會研究季刊》(80): 3-56。劉正、李錦華，2001，〈文憑主義的迷思：從勞工的薪資及雇主的徵才談起〉。《臺灣教育社會學研究》1(2): 91-129。劉冠儀，2017，《「誰不希望好？」：第二代都市原住民男性的勞動生命流轉》。臺北：國立陽明大學衛生福利研究所碩士論文。鍾秉融、謝宏仁、鍾金原，2017，〈我還不想結婚：七位女性對於婚姻的共同想像〉。《國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報》13(3): 191-217。翁康容、謝雨生，2018，〈台灣民眾轉至成人發展歷程之類型與變遷〉。《台灣社會學》(36): 111-166.瞿宛文，2017，《臺灣戰後經濟發展的源起：後進發展的為何與如何》。臺北：聯經出版。藍佩嘉，2015，〈質性個案研究法：紮根理論與延伸個案法〉。頁63-96，收於瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞編，《社會及行為科學研究法：質性研究法》。臺北：東華書局。英文專書Allison, R., and Risman, B., 2014, “"It Goes Hand in Hand with the Parties": Race, Class, and Residence in College Student Negotiations of Hooking Up.” Sociological Perspectives 57(1): 102-123.Almeida, D., 2004, “Using daily diaries to assess temporal friction between work and family.” Pp. 127-136 in Work-Family Challenges for Low-Income Parents and their Children, edited by A. C. Crouter and A. Booth. Mahwah. NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Arnett, J. J., 1994, “Are College Students Adults? Their Conceptions of the Transition to Adulthood” Journal of Adult Development 1(4): 213-224 •Arnett, J. J., 2000, “Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.” American Psychologist 55(5): 469-480.Arnett, J. J., 2004, Emerging Adulthood: The Winding Road from the Late Teens Through the Twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.Arnett, J. J., 2007, “Emerging Adulthood: What Is It, and What Is It Good For? ” Child Development Perspectives 1: 68-73.Arnett, J. J., 2016, “College Students as Emerging Adults: The Developmental Implications of the College Context.” Emerging Adulthood 4(3): 219–222.Blumberg, R. L. and Coleman, M. T., 1989, “A Theoretical Look at the Gender Balance of Power in the American Couple.” Journal of Family Issues 10(2): 225–250.Buchmann, M., and Kriesi, I., 2009, “Escaping the gender trap: Young women’s transition into nontraditional occupations.” Pp. 193–215 in Transitions from school to work: Globalization, individualization, and patterns of diversity, edited by I. Schoon and R. K. Silbereisen. New York: Cambridge University.Buhl, Heike M., 2007, “Well-being and Child – Parent Relationship University to Work Life.” Journal of Adolescent Research 22(5): 550-571.Campbell, S.M., 1980, The Couple’s Journey: Intimacy as a Path to Wholeness. CA: Impact Publishers.Chapman, G., 1992, The five love languages: How to express heartfelt commitment to your mate. Chicago, IL: Northfield Publishing.Chelune, G. J., Robinson, J. T., Kommor, M. F., 1984, “A cognitive interactional model of intimate relationships.” Pp. 11-40 in Communication, Intimacy, and Close Relationships, edited by V. J. Derlega. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Cheng, Yen-Hsin, 2014, “Changing partner choice and marriage propensities by education in post-industrial Taiwan, 2000-2010.” Demographic Research 31: 1007-1042.Cohen, P., Kasen, S., Chen, H., Hartmark, C., and Gordon, K., 2003, “Variations in patterns of developmental transmissions in the emerging adulthood period.” Developmental Psychology 39 (4): 657-669.Cook, T. D., and Furstenberg Jr., F. F., 2002, “Explaining Aspects of the Transition to Adulthood in Italy, Sweden, Germany, and the United States: A Cross-Disciplinary, Case Synthesis Approach.” THE ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 580(1): 255-287.Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., and Howard, E., 2013,” Emerging in a Digital World: A Decade Review of Media Use, Effects, and Gratifications in Emerging Adulthood.” Emerging Adulthood 1(2): 125–137.Craig, L., and Brown, J., 2014, “Weekend work and leisure time with family and friends: Who misses out?” Journal of Marriage and Family 76(4): 710– 727.Crocetti, E., Tagliabue, S., Sugimura, K., Nelson, L. J., Takahashi, A., Niwa, T., Sugiura, Y. and Jinno, M., 2015, “Perceptions of Emerging Adulthood: A Study With Italian and Japanese University Students and Young Workers.” Emerging Adulthood 3(4): 229–243.Dainton, M., and Gross, J., 2008, “The use of negative behaviors to maintain relationships.” Communication Research Reports 25(3): 179-191.Dindia, K., and Canary, D. J., 1993, “Definitions and Theoretical Perspectives on Maintaining Relationships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 10(2): 163–173.Egbert, N., and Polk, D., 2006, “Speaking the language of relational maintenance: A validity test of Chapman’s (1992) five love languages.” Communication Research Reports 23(1):19-26.Elder, Jr. G. H., 1998, “The Life Course as Developmental Theory.” Child Development 69(1): 1-12.Erikson, E. H., 1968, Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.Furstenberg, F. F., Jr., Rumbaut, R. C., and Settersten, R. A., Jr., 2005, “On the Frontier of Adulthood: Emerging Themes and New Directions.” Pp. 3-25 in On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy, edited by R. A. Settersten, Jr., F. F. Furstenberg, Jr., and R. G. Rumbaut. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Giles, H., Reid, S. A., and Harwood, J., 2010, “Introducing the dynamics of intergroup communication.” Pp. 1-16 in The dynamics of intergroup communication, edited by H. Giles, S. Reid, and J. Harwood. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Hart, M., 2015, “Youth Intimacy on Tumblr: A Pilot Study.” YOUNG 23(3): 193–208.Hobbs, M., Owen, S., and Gerber, L., 2017,” Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy.” Journal of Sociology 53(2): 271–284.Hogg, M., Terry, D., and White, K., 1995,” A Tale of Two Theories: A Critical Comparison of Identity Theory with Social Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly 58(4): 255-269.Howe, N. and Strauss, W., 2000, Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. NY: Vintage Books.Huang, L.-W. W., 2013, “The Transition Tempo and Life Course Orientation of Young Adults in Taiwan.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 646(1): 69–85.Jamieson, L., 2011, “Intimacy as a Concept: Explaining Social Change in the Context of Globalisation or Another Form of Ethnocentricism?” Sociological Research Online 16(4): 1–13.Kao, Ying-Chao and Bih, Herng-Dar, 2014, “Masculinity in Ambiguity: Constructing Taiwanese Masculine Identities Between Great Powers.” Pp. 175-191 in Masculinities in a Global Era, edited by Joseph Gelfer. New York: Springer.Kim, J. L., Sorsoli, C. L., Collins, K., Zylbergold, B. A., Schooler, D., and Tolman, D. L., 2007, “From Sex to Sexuality: Exposing the Heterosexual Script on Primetime Network Television.” The Journal of Sex Research 44(2): 145-157.Lancaster, L. C. and Stillman, D., 2002, When Generations Collide. Who They Are. Why They Clash. How to Solve the Generational Puzzle at Work. New York: Collins Business.Lever, J., Frederick, D. A., and Hertz, R., 2015, “Who Pays for Dates? Following Versus Challenging Gender Norms.” SAGE Open 5(4): 1-14.Lewis, R. A., 1973, “A longitudinal test of a developmental framework for premarital dyadic formation.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 35(1): 16-25.Luyckx, K., Schwartz, S. J., Goossens, L., and Pollock, S., 2008, “Employment, sense of coherence, and identity formation: Contextual and psychological processes on the pathway to sense of adulthood.” Journal of Adolescent Research 23(5): 566-591.Maines, David R., and Hardesty, Monica J., 1987, “Temporality and Gender: Young Adults` Career and Family Plans.” Social Forces 66(1): 102–120.Mannheim, K., 1952. “The Problem of Generations.” Pp. 109-155 in Theories of Ethnicity: A Classical Reader, edited by W. Sollors. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Marcia, J. E., 1966, “Development and validation of ego-identity status.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 3(5): 551–558.Marshall, T. C., Bejanyan, K., Di Castro, G., and Lee, R. A., 2012, “Attachment styles as predcitors of Facebook-related jealousy and surveillance in romantic relationships.” Personal Relationships 20(1): 1–22.McClintock, E. A., 2014, “Beauty and Status: The Illusion of Exchange in Partner Selection?” American Sociological Review 79(4): 575–604.Modell, J., 1989, Into One`s Own: From Youth to Adulthood in the United States, 1920-1975. Berkeley: University of California Press.Oppenheimer, V., 2003, “Cohabiting and Marriage during Young Men`s Career-Development Process.” Demography 40(1): 127–149.Pierce, C.A., Byrne, D., & Aguinis, H., 1996, “Attraction in organizations: A model of workplace romance.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 17: 5–32.Pryor, J. H., Hurtado, S., Saenz, V. B., Santos, J. L., and Korn, W. S., 2007, The American freshman: Forty year trends. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute.Reiss, I. L., 1960, “Toward a sociology of the heterosexual love relationship.” Marriage and Family Living 22(2): 139–145.Rindfuss, R., 1991, “The Young Adult Years: Diversity, Structural Change, and Fertility.” Demography 28(4): 493–512.Robards, B., and Lincoln, S., 2016, “Making It “Facebook Official”: Reflecting on Romantic Relationships Through Sustained Facebook Use.” Social Media + Society 2(4): 1–10.Ryder, N. B., 1965. “The Cohort as a Concept in the Study of Social Change.” American Sociological Review 30(6): 843–861.Schwartz, S. J., 2016, “Turning Point for a Turning Point: Advancing Emerging Adulthood Theory and Research.” Emerging Adulthood 4(5): 307–317.Seabrook, R. C., Ward, L. M., Reed, L., Manago, A., Giaccardi, S., and Lippman, J. R., 2016, “Our Scripted Sexuality: The Development and Validation of a Measure of the Heterosexual Script and Its Relation to Television Consumption.” Emerging Adulthood 4(5): 338–355.Shanahan, M., 2000, “Pathways to Adulthood in Changing Societies: Variability and Mechanisms in Life Course Perspective.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 667-692.Shulman, S., and Connolly, J., 2013, “The Challenge of Romantic Relationships in Emerging Adulthood: Reconceptualization of the Field” Emerging Adulthood 1(1): 27-39.Shulman, S., Hakhmigari, M. K., Michaeli, Y., Tuval-Mashiach, R., and Dickson, D. J., 2016, “Achieving Work and Love Authorship in Emerging Adulthood: Types, Psychosocial Correlations, and Precursors.” Emerging Adulthood 4(4): 258–271.Stafford, L., and Canary, D. J., 1991, “Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 8(2): 217-242.Stafford, L., Dainton, M., and Haas, S. M., 2000, “Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and prediction of relational characteristics.” Communication Monographs 67(3): 306-323.Sternberg, Robert J., 1986, “A triangular theory of love.” Psychological Review 93(2): 119-135.Sunstein, C. R., 1996, “Social norms and social roles”. Columbia law review 96(4): 903-968.Tajfel, H., 1974, “Social identity and intergroup behavior.” Social Science Information 13(2): 65–93.Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C., 1986, “The Social Identity Theory of Inter-Group Behavior,” in Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by Stephen Worchel and William G. Austin. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Tajfel, H., and Turner, J., 1979, “An integrative theory of intergroup conflict.” Pp. 33-47 in The social psychology of intergroup relations, edited by W. Austin and S. Worchel. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Takeuchi, M., and Tsutsui, J., 2016, “Combining egalitarian working lives with traditional attitudes: Gender role attitudes in Taiwan, Japan, and Korea.” International Journal of Japanese Sociology 25(1): 100–116.Vignoles, V. L., Schwartz, S. J., and Luyckx, K., 2011, “Introduction: Toward an integrative view of identity.” Pp. 1-28 in Handbook of identity theory and research, edited by S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, and V. L. Vignoles. New York: Springer.Waring, E.M., Tillman, M.H., Frelick, L.F., Russell, L.K., and Weisz, G.M., 1980, “Concepts of intimacy in the general population.” The Journal of nervous and mental disease 168(8): 471-474.Yoder, A. E., 2000, “Barriers to ego identity status formation: A contextual clarification of Marcia’s identity status paradigm.” Journal of Adolescence 23(1): 95-106.網路資料全國法規資料庫，2020，勞動基準法。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=N0030001，取用日期：2020年8月14日。呂蓓君、葉俊宏，2018，〈佛系青年低慾望不強求 年輕世代困境縮影〉。TVBS，5月16日。https://news.tvbs.com.tw/local/921143，取用日期：2020年1月18日。役政署，2019，服役須知。https://www.nca.gov.tw/chaspx/Faq_Detail.aspx?web=84&id=10502，取用日期：2019年12月22日。李念庭，2018，〈「佛系青年」崛起：是豁達還逃避？年輕世代困境真相〉。https://www.cheers.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5088018&page=2，取用日期：2020年1月18日。海軍軍官學校，官校生活的一天。 https://www.cna.edu.tw/tw/Life.php?progId=LIF003，取用日期：2020年8月17日。張錦弘，2017，〈指考38分可填志願…遙想當年聯考 380分只能吊車尾〉。聯合報，8月9日。https://udn.com/news/story/6925/2631580，取用日期：2020年2月15日。張瀞文，2013，〈談戀愛記大過 中學校規問題多〉。https://anntw.com/articles/20131119-E9yZ，取用日期：2019年9月13日。教育部，2019，全國大專校院校數。https://ulist.moe.gov.tw/Browse/UniversityList，取用日期：2020年1月21日。教育部臺灣閩南語常用詞辭典，2011，轉大人。https://twblg.dict.edu.tw/holodict_new/result_detail.jsp?n_no=12658&source=9&level1=9&level2=39&level3=0&curpage=0&sample=0&radiobutton=0&querytarget=0&limit=1&pagenum=0&rowcount=0&cattype=1，取用日期：2020年1月5日。統計處，2016，如何計算在學率？https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/News_Content.aspx?n=780B4CFF8FB1916B&sms=23D255462E62FBCD&s=D6DF2921B0091791，取用日期：2019年12月19日。統計處，2018，大學校院新生錄取人數及錄取率。http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/important/OVERVIEW_U10.pdf，取用日期：2019年8月20日。統計處，2019，教育統計查詢網。https://stats.moe.gov.tw/qframe.aspx?qno=MgA3AA2，取用日期：2019年12月19日。網路溫度計時事網路大數據分析，2018，〈「如果緣份到了。。。」網瘋傳17張佛系圖你中了哪些〉。https://dailyview.tw/popular/detail/1656，取用日期：2020年1月18日。劉嘉韻、蔡永彬、陳威廷，2014，〈「勒令轉學」 恐龍校規須廢止〉。https://tw.appledaily.com/headline/daily/20140507/35814155/，取用日期：2019年9月13日。Dcard，2015，〈什麼是抽卡？〉。https://faq.dcard.tw/66，取引用日期：2019年12月1日。Esther Perel，2013，The secret to desire in a long-term relationship。 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sa0RUmGTCYY，取用日期：2019年5月28日。Human Pictogram 2.0，http://pictogram2.com/?lang=en，取用日期：2019年12月26日。 zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202001460 en_US
