學術產出-會議論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 Do You Believe It Happened? Assessing Chinese Readers’ Veridicality Judgments
作者 張瑜芸
Chang, Yu-Yun
Hsieh, Shu-Kai
貢獻者 語言所
關鍵詞 event ; veridicality ; pragmatics ; linguistic features ; readers` commitments
日期 2020-05
上傳時間 17-十二月-2020 09:03:15 (UTC+8)
摘要 This work collects and studies Chinese readers’ veridicality judgments to news events (whether an event is viewed as happening or not). For instance, in “The FBI alleged in court documents that Zazi had admitted having a handwritten recipe for explosives on his computer”, do people believe that Zazi had a handwritten recipe for explosives? The goal is to observe the pragmatic behaviors of linguistic features under context which affects readers in making veridicality judgments. Exploring from the datasets, it is found that features such as event-selecting predicates (ESP), modality markers, adverbs, temporal information, and statistics have an impact on readers’ veridicality judgments. We further investigated that modality markers with high certainty do not necessarily trigger readers to have high confidence in believing an event happened. Additionally, the source of information introduced by an ESP presents low effects to veridicality judgments, even when an event is attributed to an authority (e.g. “The FBI”). A corpus annotated with Chinese readers’ veridicality judgments is released as the Chinese PragBank for further analysis.
關聯 Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020), European Language Resources Association (ELRA), pp.259-267
資料類型 conference
dc.contributor 語言所
dc.creator (作者) 張瑜芸
dc.creator (作者) Chang, Yu-Yun
dc.creator (作者) Hsieh, Shu-Kai
dc.date (日期) 2020-05
dc.date.accessioned 17-十二月-2020 09:03:15 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-十二月-2020 09:03:15 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-十二月-2020 09:03:15 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133011-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This work collects and studies Chinese readers’ veridicality judgments to news events (whether an event is viewed as happening or not). For instance, in “The FBI alleged in court documents that Zazi had admitted having a handwritten recipe for explosives on his computer”, do people believe that Zazi had a handwritten recipe for explosives? The goal is to observe the pragmatic behaviors of linguistic features under context which affects readers in making veridicality judgments. Exploring from the datasets, it is found that features such as event-selecting predicates (ESP), modality markers, adverbs, temporal information, and statistics have an impact on readers’ veridicality judgments. We further investigated that modality markers with high certainty do not necessarily trigger readers to have high confidence in believing an event happened. Additionally, the source of information introduced by an ESP presents low effects to veridicality judgments, even when an event is attributed to an authority (e.g. “The FBI”). A corpus annotated with Chinese readers’ veridicality judgments is released as the Chinese PragBank for further analysis.
dc.format.extent 539257 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020), European Language Resources Association (ELRA), pp.259-267
dc.subject (關鍵詞) event ; veridicality ; pragmatics ; linguistic features ; readers` commitments
dc.title (題名) Do You Believe It Happened? Assessing Chinese Readers’ Veridicality Judgments
dc.type (資料類型) conference