學術產出-期刊論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 音樂如何社會?從阿多諾(Adorno)到德諾拉(DeNora): 閱讀《音樂社會學導論》、《日常生活中的音樂》
Reflections on the Sociology of Music: Reading Adorno`s Introduction to the Sociology of Music and DeNora`s Music in Everyday Life
作者 黃俊銘
Huang, Chun-Ming
貢獻者 傳播學院
關鍵詞 中介;文化工業;日常生活;自我科技;阿多諾;音樂社會學
mediation  ;  cultural industry ;  everyday life ;  a technology of self ;  Adorno ;  sociology of music
日期 2019-12
上傳時間 25-一月-2021 14:27:19 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文討論兩個音樂社會學經典文本:阿多諾的《音樂社會學導 論》與德諾拉的《日常生活中的音樂》。前者視音樂為社會中介,既 造成順從亦能啟蒙重建;後者視音樂為「自我科技」,作為完成事物 的手段。本文認為德諾拉取徑阿多諾,相信音樂形式可提供實踐及塑 造意識;但人藉音樂生產能動自我,而非服從社會秩序。德諾拉被視 為代表近期音樂社會學新方向,並有情感與日常生活轉向,但仍能回 到阿多諾命題,唯賦予人更多實踐 ; 能動與希望。
This study reviews two influential texts in the sociology of music: Adorno`s Introduction to the Sociology of Music and DeNora`s Music in Everyday Life. In the former, Adorno regards music as social mediation, which not only can induce obedience but also enlighten and restructure people`s minds, whereas in the latter, DeNora conceptualises music as a technology of self-a means of accomplishing things. This study proposes that DeNora developed the thoughts of Adorno to acknowledge that music is a building material of consciousness and a mode of praxis and that individuals may use music to produce and structure their agency rather than to accompany the existing social order. The ideas of DeNora are considered a new direction in music sociology, with an `affective turn` and a focus on everyday life. They return to the Adorno proposition but pay more attention to humanity`s search for social practice, agency, and hope.
關聯 中華傳播學刊, 36, 275-288
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/10.3966/172635812019120036008
dc.contributor 傳播學院-
dc.creator (作者) 黃俊銘-
dc.creator (作者) Huang, Chun-Ming-
dc.date (日期) 2019-12-
dc.date.accessioned 25-一月-2021 14:27:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 25-一月-2021 14:27:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 25-一月-2021 14:27:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133724-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文討論兩個音樂社會學經典文本:阿多諾的《音樂社會學導 論》與德諾拉的《日常生活中的音樂》。前者視音樂為社會中介,既 造成順從亦能啟蒙重建;後者視音樂為「自我科技」,作為完成事物 的手段。本文認為德諾拉取徑阿多諾,相信音樂形式可提供實踐及塑 造意識;但人藉音樂生產能動自我,而非服從社會秩序。德諾拉被視 為代表近期音樂社會學新方向,並有情感與日常生活轉向,但仍能回 到阿多諾命題,唯賦予人更多實踐 ; 能動與希望。-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study reviews two influential texts in the sociology of music: Adorno`s Introduction to the Sociology of Music and DeNora`s Music in Everyday Life. In the former, Adorno regards music as social mediation, which not only can induce obedience but also enlighten and restructure people`s minds, whereas in the latter, DeNora conceptualises music as a technology of self-a means of accomplishing things. This study proposes that DeNora developed the thoughts of Adorno to acknowledge that music is a building material of consciousness and a mode of praxis and that individuals may use music to produce and structure their agency rather than to accompany the existing social order. The ideas of DeNora are considered a new direction in music sociology, with an `affective turn` and a focus on everyday life. They return to the Adorno proposition but pay more attention to humanity`s search for social practice, agency, and hope.-
dc.format.extent 1417970 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 中華傳播學刊, 36, 275-288-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中介;文化工業;日常生活;自我科技;阿多諾;音樂社會學-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) mediation  ;  cultural industry ;  everyday life ;  a technology of self ;  Adorno ;  sociology of music-
dc.title (題名) 音樂如何社會?從阿多諾(Adorno)到德諾拉(DeNora): 閱讀《音樂社會學導論》、《日常生活中的音樂》-
dc.title (題名) Reflections on the Sociology of Music: Reading Adorno`s Introduction to the Sociology of Music and DeNora`s Music in Everyday Life-
dc.type (資料類型) article-
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.3966/172635812019120036008-
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.3966/172635812019120036008-