dc.contributor.advisor | 顏錫銘 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Yen, Si-Ming | en_US |
dc.contributor.author (作者) | 陳鴻 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (作者) | Chen, Hong | en_US |
dc.creator (作者) | 陳鴻 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | Chen, Hong | en_US |
dc.date (日期) | 2021 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 1-二月-2021 14:31:11 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 1-二月-2021 14:31:11 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 1-二月-2021 14:31:11 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) | G0106363109 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133982 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程) | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 106363109 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 隨著經濟的快速發展帶來的需求,相關的金融服務如雨後春筍般的出現,讓消費者們生活更加便利,也帶動了整體社會的進步,使得各國也藉著各種不同方式逐步發展普惠金融,而臺灣也在此行列當中。截至2017年為止,臺灣成年人口擁有銀行帳戶的比率是94.2%,跟其他國家比較起來算是相當高的數字,不過與同樣屬於高收入國家或地區中,臺灣在借貸、儲蓄等基礎金融行為及數位金融的使用比率上,則表現相對差強人意,表示雖然臺灣幾乎人人有銀行帳戶,但使用各項線下及線上之金融服務的人仍占少數,特別是較低收入族群以及居住在較偏鄉地區的族群更是明顯,也表示臺灣在實現普惠金融目標上仍有很大的努力空間。與臺灣相比,韓國同樣屬於高收入國家之列,且擁有與臺灣相近之94.9%帳戶擁有率,卻在各項金融行為之使用率上明列各國前段水準,顯示出韓國在發展普惠金融的道路上做出了更多的努力,也是臺灣能夠學習的良好對象,除此之外,全球各國在此領域也各自有著值得臺灣學習的做法。本研究目的為藉由整理臺灣各項金融行為表現之程度,並藉由臺灣在各項數據上與韓國之比較,以及探討韓國與各國政府單位、金融機構之作法,找出臺灣在普惠金融發展上出現之問題,包含弱勢族群與其他人民在帳戶擁有率、借貸、儲蓄等基礎金融行為上所出現之差異、數位金融使用程度上之落後、非現金交易通路上之顯著落差等問題。最後針對上述之問題,我們提出適合臺灣解決問題之建議策略,包含政府機構與金融機構合作,降低金融服務門檻、透過金融科技提高人民帳戶持有率並降低偏鄉地區人民使用金融服務成本、透過地方政府機構提供金融教育與資訊、提供數位管道使用金融服務之補貼、建立基礎網路設施等。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | With the demand brought by the rapid economic development, related financial services have sprung up, making consumers` lives more convenient, and also driving the progress of the society as a whole, making countries gradually develop inclusive finance through various methods, and Taiwan is also among the ranks. As of 2017, the percentage of Taiwan’s adult population with bank accounts is 94.2%, which is a very high figure compared to other countries. However, compared with other high-income countries or regions, Taiwan’s basic financial behaviors such as lending and saving and digital In terms of financial utilization ratio, the performance is relatively unsatisfactory, indicating that although almost everyone in Taiwan has a bank account, the number of people who use various offline and online financial services is still a minority, especially the lower-income groups and those living in more remote rural areas. The ethnic group in the region is even more obvious, and it also indicates that Taiwan still has a lot of room for efforts in achieving the goal of inclusive finance.Compared with Taiwan, South Korea is also a high-income country, and has a 94.9% account ownership rate similar to Taiwan. However, the use rate of various financial activities clearly lists the country’s leading level, showing that South Korea is developing inclusive finance More efforts have been made on the road, which is also a good target for Taiwan to learn. In addition, countries around the world have their own practices in this field that Taiwan can learn from.The purpose of this research is to sort out the degree of Taiwan’s financial performance, compare Taiwan’s data with South Korea, and explore the practices of South Korea, government units and financial institutions in various countries, and find out Taiwan’s inclusive finance Problems in development include the differences between disadvantaged groups and other people in basic financial behaviors such as account ownership, lending, and savings, the backwardness in the use of digital finance, and the significant gap in non-cash transaction channels. Finally, in response to the above-mentioned problems, we propose suitable strategies for solving Taiwan’s problems, including cooperation between government agencies and financial institutions to lower the threshold of financial services, increase the holding rate of people’s accounts through financial technology, and reduce the cost of financial services used by people in remote areas. Local government agencies provide financial education and information, provide subsidies for digital channels to use financial services, and establish basic network facilities. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 論文目次謝誌 II中文摘要 III目次 IV表次 V圖次 VI第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究動機與目的 1第二節 研究背景 2第三節 研究方法與架構 6第二章 文獻探討 7第一節 普惠金融 7第二節 金融科技 22第三章 臺灣普惠金融之發展現況 36第一節 衡量臺灣普惠金融發展程度 36第二節 臺灣數位管道使用金融服務之現況 49第四章 韓國與各國普惠金融發展方式 55第一節 韓國發展普惠金融之方式 55第二節 全球推動普惠金融知名案例 64第五章 臺灣普惠金融發展問題分析與解決之道 72第一節 臺灣與韓國之普惠金融發展比較 72第二節 臺灣普惠金融發展問題 93第三節 臺灣普惠金融發展策略芻議 97第六章 研究結論與建議 104第一節 研究結論 104第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議 106參考文獻 109附錄 113 | zh_TW |
dc.format.extent | 3107919 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106363109 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 普惠金融 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 數位金融 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 金融科技 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 非現金支付 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | 臺灣普惠金融發展之研究:以韓國為鑑 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | A Study of Taiwan Financial Inclusion Development:Korea as a Reference | en_US |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en_US |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 參考文獻1.王冠詔(2017),台灣區塊鏈發展之研究,國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。2.中華民國中央銀行全球資訊網(2020)。全體金融機構非現金支付交易統計。檢自https://www.cbc.gov.tw/tw/np-299-1.html(Jan.19, 2021)3.曲正雅(2019),開放銀行商業模式於台灣發展之分析,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。4.李晏寧(2016),區塊鏈技術對金融業之影響與挑戰,國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所碩士論文。5.邱俊榮(2005),台韓經濟發展消長比較分析。檢自http://ebooks.lib.ntu.edu.tw/1_file/moea/111806/b.pdf(Jan.19.2021)6.林旻(2020),Open banking 涉及之個人資料保護問題。,國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所碩士論文。7.林盈吟(2019),以科技接受模型探討使用者接受純網銀的行為意圖-以台灣為例,國立暨南國際大學管理學院經營管理碩士學位學程碩士在職專班碩士論文。8.亞洲金融發展報告:普惠金融篇,全文(民109年7月9日)。檢自https://tech.sina.cn/2020-07-09/detail-iircuyvk2786336.d.html(Jan.19, 2021)9.卓瑩鎗(2018),政府高喊「行動支付」,為什麼臺灣人還是最愛塑膠卡。檢自https://www.thenewslens.com/article/90071(Jan.19,2021)10.科技不怕問-韓國網速為何能多年位居全球第一,全文(民104年5月21日)。檢自https://tech.qq.com/a/20150521/008654.htm(Jan.19,2021)11.為何臺灣行動支付不盛行?從長輩使用經驗,就可看出業者用不用心,全文(民107年3月8日)。檢自https://buzzorange.com/techorange/2018/03/08/mobile-pay-hard-for-old-people/ (Jan.19, 2021)12.翁書婷(2016),Samsung Pay交易額突破2兆韓元!韓國行動支付發展迅速,租稅減免是關鍵。檢自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/40695/BN-2016-08-24-104219-40(Jan.19, 2021)13.陳志榮(2018),台灣行動支付產業未來展望之研究,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。14.陳力新(2018),智能理財產業分析,國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)碩士論文。15.高敬原(2019),免年費、憑手機就能辦卡,巴西純網銀Nubank為何讓軟銀、騰訊搶著投資。檢自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/53579/nubank-softbank-valuation-brazil-banking-funding(Jan.19,2021)16.黃宗昊、歐陽睿(民101),政治制度與金融改革-台灣與韓國的比較。臺灣民主季刊,9(1)。DOI:10.6448/TDQ.201203.014317.黃虹傑(2019),台灣純網銀策略探討-以LINE Bank為例,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。18.資策會產業情報研究所(2020),【2020上半年行動支付大調查】行動支付首選偏好度 已首度超越實體卡。檢自https://mic.iii.org.tw/news.aspx?id=572(Jan.19, 2021)19.楊博丞(2018),台灣智能理財發展之研究,國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。20.詹宛霓(2019),純網路銀行經營策略研究-以將來銀行為例,國立臺灣大學企業管理碩士專班碩士論文。21.鄭世玄(2018),區塊鏈應用:以數位學位證書發證系統為例,國立高雄第一科技大學資訊管理系電子商務碩士班碩士論文。22.謝佳君(2016),台灣發展電子支付之探討以銀行業為例,國立臺灣科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。23.蘇玟臻(2018),區塊鏈技術應用於我國銀行供應鏈融資平台之研究,國立中央大學資訊管理學系在職專班碩士論文。24.Datareportal (2019),DIGITAL 2019:GLOBAL DIGITALOVERVIEW. Retrieved fromhttps://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2019-global-digital-overview(Jan.19, 2021)25.Datareportal (2020),Digital 2020:KOREA. Retrievedfrom https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-south-korea (Jan.19, 2021)26.Datareportal (2020),Digital 2020:TAIWAN. Retrievedfrom https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-taiwan (Jan.19, 2021)27.David Tuesta & Noelia Cámara (2014),MeasuringFinancial Inclusion:A Multidimensional Index(WorkingPaper,Nº 14/26). BBVA Research28.eMarketer (2019),Global Mobile Payment Users 2019.Retrieved fromhttps://www.emarketer.com/content/global-mobile-payment-users-2019(Jan.19, 2021)29.International Monetary Fund (2019),Financial AccessSurvey. Retrieved from https://data.imf.org/?sk=E5DCAB7E-A5CA-4892-A6EA-598B5463A34C (Jan.19, 2021)30.Internet World Stats-Usage and Population Statistics(2020),Internet Usage in Asia. Retrieved fromhttps://www.internetworldstats.com/stats3.htm(Jan.19,2021)31.Jocelyn Lee (2018),行動支付普及化挑戰:就算租稅優惠給足了,還有手續費頂著呢。檢自https://medium.com/plaintech/how-payment-processing-fee-influences-the-development-of-mobile-payments-fb5cda54df94(Jan.19, 2021)32.Kakao Annual Financial Report (2020). Retrieved fromhttps://www.kakaocorp.com/ir/referenceRoom/earningsAnnouncement?lang=en (Jan.19, 2021)33.Kaur Mandeep、Nanda Kajole (2016),Financial Inclusionand Human Development: A cross-country Evidence.Management and Labour Studies. 41 (2): 127–153.doi:10.1177/0258042X16658734. S2CID 158002205.34.Merchant Machine (2018),The Rise of Digital & MobileWallets:2020 Global Usage Stats. Retrieved fromhttps://merchantmachine.co.uk/digital-wallet/(Jan.19, 2021)35.Merchant Savvy (2020),Amazing Stats Demonstrating theUnstoppable Rise of Mobile Payments Globally.Retrieved from https://www.merchantsavvy.co.uk/mobile-payment-stats-trends/(Jan.19, 2021)36.Naver Annual Financial Report (2019). Retrieved fromhttps://www.navercorp.com/en/investment/annualReport(Jan.19, 2021)37.Pulse (2020),S. Korean internet giants Naver & Kakaofast penetrate financial sector. Retrieved fromhttps://pulsenews.co.kr/view.php?year=2020&no=716023(Jan.19, 2021)38.Portulans Institute (2019),The Network ReadinessIndex 2019. Retrieved fromhttps://networkreadinessindex.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/The-Network-Readiness-Index-2019-New-version-March-2020.pdf(Jan.19, 2021)39.Van Loo Rory (2018),Making Innovation MoreCompetitive: The Case of Fintech. UCLA Law Review. 65(1): 232.40.World Economic Forum (2015),Future of FinancialServices 2015. Retrieved fromhttps://www.weforum.org/reports/future-financial-services-2015(Jan.19, 2021)41.World Bank (2017),Global Financial Inclusion IndexDatabase. Retrieved fromhttps://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/global-financial-inclusion-global-findex-database(Jan.19,021)42.World Bank (2013),Global Financial Development Report2014: Financial Inclusion. The World Bank.doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-9985-9. hdl:10986/16238. ISBN978-0-8213-9985-9. | zh_TW |
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) | 10.6814/NCCU202100149 | en_US |