Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 論國際法與國際關係之互動：以 2016年中菲南海仲裁案地緣政治之影響為例
The Implications of the 2016 Arbitration on Geopolitics in the South China Sea: the Interaction Between International Law and International Relations作者 宋高祖
Soong, Claus貢獻者 陳貞如
Chen, Chen-Ju
宋高祖
Claus Soong關鍵詞 南海仲裁案
中美關係
菲律賓
越南
聯合國海洋法公約
2016 South China Sea Arbitration
China-U.S. Relations
Philippines
Vietnam
UNCLOS日期 2020 上傳時間 2-Mar-2021 14:35:21 (UTC+8) 摘要 本文主張，二零一六中菲南海仲裁案就南海問題法制化並海洋法公約一二一條三款的解釋不單為中菲兩國，也同時為其他聲索國在南海的紛爭提供了清晰的法律基礎。本文認為，仲裁案就海洋法公約的解釋構成了某種意義上的軟法，並為海洋法公約架構下南海相關以及其他未來類似案例提供指引。政治意義上而言，仲裁案為觀察國際法如何影響國際關係，特別是像中國與國際規範體系、東協與區域整合、中美關係惡化下的對峙等議題提供了新的視角。在區域層級上，藉由中國在仲裁結果公布後與東協成員國進行南海行為準則（CoC）協商而觀，仲裁案確有促進區域協調合作之效果，形成軟法以避免各相關國之間產生進一步衝突的可能。惟就此項趨勢而言，因中國以制度主義的方式實踐其現實主義下零和性的擴張式國家利益，南海行為準則此一規範之形成，實際上更加是往國際法律秩序碎片化的方向發展。對於菲律賓與越南而言，由仲裁案所帶來的法律解釋和澄清的海洋權利使得同北京的談判有更多籌碼。同時，美國在區域中的存在對於規模較小的聲索國面對中國時非常重要。但河內與馬尼拉也擔心對於華盛頓對南海區域秩序中是否有足夠的意願做出承諾，且是否願意支持其盟友對抗中國的擴張性行為。
This thesis argued that by clarifying the Article 121(3) of UNCLOS, the 2016 South China Sea Arbitration provided a clear legal basis on the disputes that exist not just between China and the Philippines but also among other claimant states through the legalization of the South China Sea. The interpretations made by the Arbitration constitute a kind of soft law, which has influence within the framework of UNCLOS and provides guidance for future decisions beyond disputes in the South China Sea. Politically, the Arbitration offered a new dimension to observe how international law can shape the development of international relations, especially in issues areas such as China and the international rule-based system, ASEAN and regionalization, and the confrontations under worsening US–China relations. At the regional level, through Chinese behaviors and its negotiation with ASEAN on the development of the CoC, the Arbitration did foster regional coordination to cooperate on soft law to avoid further conflict among states. However, such development has seemed to lead toward fragmentation of the international legal order as China is using the means of institutionalism to realize its expansive national interest in a realist zero-sum sense. For Vietnam and Philippines, the leverage supplied by the Arbitration has provided a higher bargaining margin when negotiating with Beijing. Also, the US presence in the region is important for the smaller claimant states when facing China. However, Manila and Hanoi are concerned on how the United States would position itself in the region, how committed Washington is to the regional order, and how willing it is to support its allies to confront China’s expansive behaviors.參考文獻 Books and ChaptersAbbott, Kenneth Wayne, and Duncan Snidal. “Law, Legalization and Politics: An Agenda for the Next Generation of IR-IL Scholars.” Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, Cambridge University Press, 2013.Acharya, Amitav. “Rethinking Demand, Purpose and Progress in Global Governance: An Introduction.” Why Govern? Rethinking Demand and Progress in Global Governance, by Amitav Acharya, Cambridge University Press, 2016.Amitav, Acharya. “Thinking Theoretically about Asian IR.” International Relations of Asia, edited by David Shambaugh and Michael Yahuda, Rowman & Littlefield, 2014.Armstrong, James David, et al. International Law and International Relations. 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2012.Batongbacal, Jay L. “Philippines’ Legal Policy Options and Future Prospects.” South China Sea Lawfare: Post-Arbitration Policy Options and Future Prospects, edited by Fu-Kuo Liu, South China Sea Think Tank, 2017.Baviera, Alieen S. P. “The Philippines and the South China Sea Dispute: Security Interests and Perspective.” The South China Sea Dispute: Navigating Diplomatic and Strategic Tensions, edited by Ian Storey and Zhengyi Lin, ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, 2016.Beckman, Robert. “International Law, UNCLOS and the South China Sea.” Beyond Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea: Legal Frameworks for the Joint Development of Hydrocarbon Resources, edited by Robert Beckman, Edward Elgar, 2013.Beckman, Robert. “Jurisdictional Issues in the South China Sea Arbitration.” South China Sea Arbitration: The Legal Dimension, edited by S. Jayakumar, Edward Elgar, 2018.Brown, Chris. Sovereignty, Rights, and Justice: International Political Theory Today. Polity Press, 2006.Brown, Kerry. China`s World: The Foreign Policy of the World`s Newest Superpower. I.B. Tauris,, 2017.Brunnée, Jutta, and Stephen J. Toope. “Constructivism and International Law.” Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, Cambridge University Press, 2013.DeLisle, Jacques, and Avery Goldstein, eds. China`s Global Engagement: Cooperation, Competition, and Influence in the 21st Century. Brookings Institution Press, 2017.Dill, Janina. Legitimate Targets? Social Construction, International Law and US Bombing. Cambridge University Press, 2015.Đỗ Thanh Hải. Vietnam and the South China Sea: Politics, Security, and Legality. Routledge, 2019.Dodge, William S. “Res Judicata.” SSRN, Oxford Public International Law, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, May 12, 2016, ssrn.com/abstract=2778726.Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Mark A. Pollack. “International Law and International Relations.” Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, Cambridge University Press, 2013.Finnemore, Martha. National Interests in International Society. Cornell University Press, 1996.Franckx, Eric. “The Arbitral Tribunal’s Interpretation of Paragraph 3 in Article 121: A First but Important Step Forward.” South China Sea Arbitration: The Legal Dimension, edited by S. Jayakumar, Edward Elgar, 2018.Franckx, Eric. “The Award of 12 July 2016 and Its Impact on the Clarification of Article 121 (3) LOSC.” Islands and Rocks in the South China Sea: Post-Hague Ruling, by James Borton, Xlibris, 2017.Friedberg, Aaron L. A Contest for Supremacy: China, America, and the Struggle for Mastery in Asia. WW Norton & Company, 2011.Goh, Evelyn. The Struggle for Order: Hegemony, Hierarchy, and Transition in Post-Cold War East Asia. Oxford University Press, 2013.Heydarian, Richard Javad. “Philippines’ Diplomatic Policy Options and Future Prospects.” South China Sea Lawfare: Post-Arbitration Policy Options and Future Prospects, edited by Fu-Kuo Liu, South China Sea Think Tank, 2017.Hurrell, Andrew. On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford University Press, 2007.Jeong, Gab Yong. “A Study of the China’s ‘Nine-Dash’ Line: The Award of PCA.” Islands and Rocks in the South China Sea: Post-Hague Ruling, edited by James Borton, Place of Publication Not Identified, 2017.Jayakumar, S., et al. South China Sea Arbitration: The Legal Dimension. Edward Elgar, 2018.Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press, 1984.Keohane, Robert O. Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World. Routledge, 2002.Koremenos, Barbara. “Institutionalism and International Law.” Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Mark A. Pollack and Jeffrey L. Dunoff, Cambridge University Press, 2013.Kraska, James. Maritime Power and the Law of the Sea Expeditionary Operations in World Politics. Oxford University Press, 2011.Krasner, Stephen D. “Problematic Sovereignty.” Problematic Sovereignty Contested Rules and Political Possibilities, Columbia University Press, 2001.Li, Guateng. The Sea without Disputes: The Distorted History of South China Sea (SCS) before 1900 (Bei Niu Qu De Nan Hai Shi: Er Shi Shi Ji Qian De Nan Zhong Guo Hai 被扭曲的南海史：二十世紀前的南中國海)). Wu Nan, 2016.Llamzon, Alyosius. “The Juridical Island: From the Island of Palmas to the South China Sea.” Islands and Rocks in the South China Sea: Post-Hague Ruling, edited by James Borton, Xlibris, 2017.Mitter, Rana. “Chinese Ideas of Order and Justice.” Order and Justice in International Relations, edited by Rosemary Foot et al., Oxford University Press, 2003.Moravcsik, Andrew. “Liberal Theories of International Law.” Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, Cambridge University Press, 2013.Morgenthau, Hans J., et al. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. McGraw Hill Higher Education, 1985.Nong, Hong. “China’s Legal Policy Options and Future Prospects.” South China Sea Lawfare: Post-Arbitration Policy Options and Future Prospects, edited by Fu-Kuo Liu, South China Sea Think Tank, 2017.Nordquist, Myron H. “UNCLOS Article 121 and Itu Aba in the South China Sea Final Award: A Correct Interpretation?” The South China Sea Arbitration: The Legal Dimension, edited by S. Jayakumar et al., Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.Posen, Barry R. Restraint: A New Foundation for US Grand Strategy. Cornell University Press, 2014.Reus-Smit, Christian. “Constructivism and the English School.” Theorising International Society: English School Methods, edited by Cornelia Navari, Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Reus-Smit, Christian. “The Politics of International Law.” The Politics of International Law, edited by Christian Reus-Smit, Cambridge University Press, 2004.Robinson, James A., and Daron Acemoglu. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. Profile, 2012.Roy, Denny. “The United States and the South China Sea: Front Line of the Hegemonic Tension?” The South China Sea Dispute: Navigating Diplomatic and Strategic Tensions, edited by Ian Storey and Zhengyi Lin, ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, 2016.Shaffer, Gregory, and Mark A. Pollack. “Hard Law and Soft Law.” Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, Cambridge University Press, 2013.Shambaugh, David L. China goes Global: The Partial Power. Oxford University Press, 2013.Shaw, Malcolm N. International Law. Cambridge University Press, 2008.Spangler, Jonathan. “South China Sea Policy Options in the Post-Arbitration Context.” South China Sea Lawfare: Post-Arbitration Policy Options and Future Prospects, edited by Fu-Kuo Liu, South China Sea Think Tank, 2017.Steinberg, Richard H. “Wanted Dead or Alive: Realism in International Law.” Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, Cambridge University Press, 2013.Storey, Ian, and Zhengyi Lin. “Introduction.” The South China Sea Dispute: Navigating Diplomatic and Strategic Tensions, edited by Ian Storey and Zhengyi Lin, ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, 2016.Storey, Ian. “Rising Tension in the South China Sea: Southeast Asian Responses.” The South China Sea Dispute: Navigating Diplomatic and Strategic Tensions, edited by Ian Storey and Zhengyi Lin, ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, 2016.Talmon, Stefan, and Bing Bing. Jia. “Introduction.” The South China Sea Arbitration: A Chinese Perspective, edited by Stefan Talmon and Bing Bing. Jia, Hart, 2014.Talmon, Stefan. “The South China Sea Arbitration: Is There a Case to Answer?” The South China Sea Arbitration: a Chinese Perspective, edited by Stefan Talmon and Bing Bing. Jia, Hart, 2014..Vu, Truong- Minh, and Thank Trung Nguyen. “Vietnam’s Policy Options and Future Prospects.” South China Sea Lawfare: Post-Arbitration Policy Options and Future Prospects, by Fu-Kuo Liu, South China Sea Think Tank, 2017.Waltz, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics, McGraw-Hill, 1979.Wan, Ming. The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: The Construction of Power and the Struggle for the East Asian International Order. Springer, 2016.Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press, 1999.Yan, Xue tong, et al. Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power, Princeton University Press, 2013.Yan, Yan. “China’s Diplomatic Policy Options and Future Prospects.” South China Sea Lawfare: Post-Arbitration Policy Options and Future Prospects, edited by Fu-Kuo Liu, South China Sea Think Tank, 2017.Journal ArticlesAbbott, Kenneth W. “Modem International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers.” Yale Journal of International Law, vol. 14, no. 2, 1989.Abbott, Kenneth W., et al. “The Concept of Legalization.” International Organization, vol. 54, no. 3, 2000.Axelrod, Robert, and Robert O. Keohane. “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” World Politics, vol. 38, no. 1, 1985.Chinese Society of International Law, “The South China Sea Arbitration Awards: A Critical Study,” Chinese Journal of International Law, vol. 17, no. 2, 2018.Chan, Jane. “Singapore and the South China Sea: Being an Effective Coordinator and Honest Broker.” Asia Policy, vol. 21, no. 1, 2016, p. 44.Chung, Chris P. C. “Drawing the U-Shaped Line.” Modern China, vol. 42, no. 1, 2016.Fravel, M. Taylor. “China`s Strategy in the South China Sea.” Contemporary Southeast Asia, vol. 33, no. 3, 2011.Friedberg, Aaron L. “The Sources of Chinese Conduct: Explaining Beijing`s Assertiveness.” The Washington Quarterly, vol. 37, no 4, 2014.Friedberg, Aaron L. “Globalisation and Chinese Grand Strategy.” Survival vol. 60, no. 1, 2018.Gamble, John King. “The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea as Soft Law.” Houston Journal of International Law, vol. 8, no. 1, 1985.Gao, Zhiguo, and Bing Bing. Jia. “The Nine-Dash Line in The South China Sea: History, Status, and Implications.” The American Journal of International Law, vol. 107, no. 1, 2013.Gau, Michael Sheng-Ti. “The Interpretation of Article 121(3) of UNCLOS by the Tribunal for the South China Sea Arbitration: A Critique.” Ocean Development & International Law, vol. 50, no. 1, 2019.Glaser, Charles L. “Realists as Optimists: Cooperation as Self-Help.” International Security, vol. 19, no. 3, 1994.Goldstein, Avery. “Power Transitions, Institutions, and China`s Rise in East Asia: Theoretical Expectations and Evidence.” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 30, no. 4-5, 2007.Goldstein, Avery. “China`s Grand Strategy under Xi Jinping: Reassurance, Reform, and Resistance.” International Security vol. 45, no. 1, 2020.Guzman, Andrew T. “Against Consent.” SSRN Electronic Journal, Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 52, no. 4, 2012.Ikenberry, G. John. “From Hegemony to the Balance of Power: the Rise of China and American Grand Strategy in East Asia.” International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, vol. 23, no 2, 2014.Ikenberry, G. John. “The End of Liberal International Order?.” International Affairs, vol. 94, no. 1, 2018.Johnston, Alastair Iain. “How New and Assertive is China`s New Assertiveness?.” International Security vol, 37, no. 4, 2013.Krasner, Stephen D. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables.” International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2, 1982.Li, Mingjiang. “Reconciling Assertiveness and Cooperation? China’s Changing Approach to the South China Sea Dispute.” Security Challenges, vol. 6, no. 2, 2010.Macmillan, John. “Liberalism and the Democratic Peace.” Review of International Studies, vol. 30, no. 2, 2004.Nguyen Thi, Lan Anh. “The South China Sea Award: Legal Implications for Vietnam.” Contemporary Southeast Asia, vol. 38, no. 3, 2016.Nguyen, Hong Thao. “Vietnam’s Position on the Sovereignty over the Paracels and the Spratlys: Its Maritime Claims.” Journal of East Asia and International Law, vol. 5, no. 1, 2012.Nincic, Miroslav. “The National Interest and Its Interpretation.” The Review of Politics, vol. 61, no. 1, 1999.Perry, Elizabeth J. “China in 1992: An Experiment in Neo-authoritarianism.” Asian Survey, vol. 33, no. 1, 1993.Phan, Hao Duy, and Lan Ngoc Nguyen. “The South China Sea Arbitration: Bindingness, Finality, and Compliance with UNCLOS Dispute Settlement Decisions.” Asian Journal of International Law, vol. 8, no. 1, 2017.Reus-Smit, Christian. “The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions.” International Organization, vol. 51, no. 4, 1997.Roy, Denny. “Southeast Asia and China: Balancing or Bandwagoning?.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, vol. 27, no. 2, 2005.Shambaugh, David. “China engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order.” International Security, vol. 29, no. 3, 2004.Swaine, Michael D. “China’s Assertive Behavior: Part One: On ‘Core Interests.” China Leadership Monitor vol. 34. no. 22, 2011.Talmon, Stefan. “The South China Sea Arbitration and the Finality of ‘Final’ Awards.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement, vol. 8, no. 2, 2017.Tønnesson, Stein. “The South China Sea in the Age of European Decline.” Modern Asian Studies, vol. 40, no. 1, 2006.Tsai, Chi-ting and Wei-hua Chen. China’s Response to the Legalization of the South China Sea Arbitration (Zhōngguó duì nánhǎi zhòngcái àn fǎzhì huà zhī huíyīng 中國對南海仲裁案法制化之回應), Prospect Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 1, 2017.Wendt, Alexander. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: the Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, 1992.Wendt, Alexander. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security, vol. 20, no. 1, 1995.Yoshihara, Toshi. “China`s Vision of Its Seascape: the First Island Chain and Chinese Seapower.” Asian Politics & Policy, vol. 4, no. 3, 2012.Zou, Keyuan. “China`s U-Shaped Line in the South China Sea Revisited.” Ocean Development & International Law, vol. 43, no. 1, 2012.Zou, Keyuan. “Historic Rights in International Law and in China`s Practice.” Ocean Development & International Law, vol. 32, no. 2, 2001.News Reports and ArticlesAssociated Press. “Recent Developments Surrounding the South China Sea.” The Diplomat, January 14, 2020, thediplomat.com/2020/01/recent-developments-surrounding-the-south-china-sea.Gutierrez, Jason, and Hannah Beech. “Sinking of Philippine Boat Puts South China Sea Back at Issue.” The New York Times, June 13, 2019, www.nytimes.com/2019/06/13/world/asia/south-china-sea-philippines.htmlGladstone, Rick. “How the Cold War Between China and U.S. Is Intensifying.” The New York Times, July 22, 2020, www.nytimes.com/2020/07/22/world/asia/us-china-cold-war.html.Huong, Huong Thu. “Vietnam Manages Delicate Balance between US and China.” Nikkei Asian Review, November 14, 2017, asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Trump-s-Asian-visit/Vietnam-manages-delicate-balance-between-US-and-China.Jennings, Ralph. “China Seen Holding Off Expansion in Disputed Sea Due to Closer Philippine Ties.” Voice of America, August 25, 2019, www.voanews.com/east-asia-pacific/china-seen-holding-expansion-disputed-sea-due-closer-philippine-ties.Jennings, Ralph. “How Vietnam Quietly Built Up 10 Islands in Asia’s Most Disputed Sea.” Voice of America, April 19, 2019, www.voanews.com/east-asia-pacific/how-vietnam-quietly-built-10-islands-asias-most-disputed-sea.Jennings, Ralph. “Philippine Trust in China Drops over South China Sea Activity.” Voice of America English News, August 25, 2019, learningenglish.voanews.com/a/philippine-trust-in-china-drops-over-south-china-sea-activity/5051752.html.Khmer Times. “Cambodia and Myanmar in Joint Stand on South China Sea Dispute.” Khmer Times, July 4, 2016, www.khmertimeskh.com/25448/cambodia-and-myanmar-in-joint-stand-on-south-china-sea-dispute/.Lewis , Mark. “Norway`s Salmon Rot as China Takes Revenge for Dissident`s Nobel Prize.” The Independent, October 23, 2011, www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/norways-salmon-rot-as-china-takes-revenge-for-dissidents-nobel-prize-2366167.html.Li, Jing. “首轮中美经济对话: 除上月球外主要问题均已谈及 (First Round of the Sino-US Economic Dialogue: In Addition to the Main Discussion of the Moon).” China News Online, July 29, 2009, www.chinanews.com/gn/news/2009/07-29/1794984.shtml.Liu, Xuanzun. “China`s Two Aircraft Carriers in Apparent Simultaneous Exercises for 1st Time: Reports.” Global Times, September 6, 2020, www.globaltimes.cn/content/1200053.shtml.Long, Drake. “Vietnamese, Philippine Fishermen Protest China`s Fishing Ban in SCS.” Radio Free Asia, May 4, 2020, https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/scs-fishing-05042020194837.html.Mie, Ayako. “Japan Steps up Rhetoric over Okinotorishima in Wake of Hague Ruling.” The Japan Times, July 15, 2016, www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/07/15/national/politics-diplomacy/japan-steps-rhetoric-okinotorishima-wake-hague-ruling.Mogato, Manuel. “ASEAN Deadlocked on South China Sea, Cambodia Blocks Statement.” Thomson Reuters, July 26, 2016, www.reuters.com/article/us-southchinasea-ruling-asean-idUSKCN1050F6.Ng, Teddy. “Philippines ‘Rebuilding Runway on South China Sea Island’.” South China Morning Post, May 26, 2018, www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2147935/philippines-rebuilding-runway-south-china-sea-island.Reuters. “Thailand `Supports` China`s Efforts to Maintain Maritime Peace.” Thomson Reuters, September 7, 2016, www.reuters.com/article/asean-summit-southchinasea-thailand-idUSL3N1BJ27A.Strait Times. “China to Expand Land Reclamation Activities in South China Sea, Say Experts.” The Straits Times, February 6, 2018, www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/china-to-expand-land-reclamation-activities-in-south-china-sea-say-experts.Zhou, Laura. “Beijing`s South China Sea Fishing Ban Threatens to Raise Tensions.” South China Morning Post, May 8, 2020, www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3083572/beijings-south-china-sea-fishing-ban-threatens-raise-tensions.Websites and BlogpostsAsia Maritime Transparency Initiative. “Arbitration Support Tracker.” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, June 16, 2016, amti.csis.org/arbitration-support-tracker.Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. “Vietnam’s Island Building: Double-Standard or Drop in the Bucket?” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, 2016, amti.csis.org/vietnams-island-building.Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. “Who`s Taking Sides on China`s Maritime Claims?” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, September 24, 2020, amti.csis.org/whos-taking-sides-on-chinas-maritime-claims.Brunnée, Jutta. “A Constructivist Theory of International Law?” EJIL Talk, September 23, 2015, www.ejiltalk.org/a-constructivist-theory-of-international-law.ChinaPower. “How Much Trade Transits the South China Sea?” ChinaPower Project, CSIS, October 10, 2019, chinapower.csis.org/much-trade-transits-south-china-sea.Guilfoyle, Douglas. “A New Twist in the South China Sea Arbitration: The Chinese Society of International Law’s Critical Study.” EJIL Talk, May 25, 2018, www.ejiltalk.org/a-new-twist-in-the-south-china-sea-arbitration-the-chinese-society-of-international-laws-critical-study.Ott, Marvin. “The South China Sea in Strategic Terms.” Wilson Center, May 14, 2019, www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/the-south-china-sea-strategic-terms.Overseas Base Realignment and Closure Coalition. “U.S. MILITARY BASES OVERSEAS: THE FACTS.’’, www.overseasbases.net/fact-sheet.html.Panda, Ankit. “China and South Korea: Examining the Resolution of the THAAD Impasse.” The Diplomat, November 13, 2017, thediplomat.com/2017/11/china-and-south-korea-examining-the-resolution-of-the-thaad-impasse.Parameswaran, Prashanth. “The Limits of Duterte’s US-China Rebalance.” The Diplomat, October 24, 2016, thediplomat.com/2016/10/the-limits-of-dutertes-us-china-rebalance.Rachman, Gideon. “A New Cold War: Trump, Xi and the Escalating US-China Confrontation.” Financial Times, October 5. 2020, www.ft.com/content/7b809c6a-f733-46f5-a312-9152aed28172.Sun, Tzu. “The Internet Classics Archive: The Art of War by Sun Tzu.” Translated by Lionel Giles, The Internet Classics Archive | The Art of War by Sun Tzu, classics.mit.edu/Tzu/artwar.html.The World Bank Group. “World Development Indicators.” DataBank. databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=2.Thayer, Carl. “A Closer Look at the ASEAN-China Single Draft South China Sea Code of Conduct.” The Diplomat, August 6, 2018, thediplomat.com/2018/08/a-closer-look-at-the-asean-china-single-draft-south-china-sea-code-of-conduct.Vu, Truong Minh, and Nguyen Thanh Trung. “Vietnam’s Need for a Post-Arbitration Policy.” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, August 18, 2016, amti.csis.org/vietnams-need-post-arbitration-policy.Government Statements and DocumentsChinaMinistry of Foreign Affairs, People’s Republic of China. “Statement of the Government of the People’s Republic of China on China’s Territorial Sovereignty and Maritime Rights and Interests in the South China Sea.” The South China Sea Issues, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the People’s Republic of China, July 12, 2016, www.fmprc.gov.cn/nanhai/eng/snhwtlcwj_1/t1379493.htm.People`s Daily. “习近平在第十二届全国人民代表大会第一次会议上的讲话 (Xi-Jinping’s Speech on the 1st Meeting of 12th National People Congress).’” People.cn, March 18, 2013, cpc.people.com.cn/n/2013/0318/c64094-20819130.html.Permanent Mission of the People’s Republic of China to the United Nations. “Note verbal the to the Secretary-General of United Nations”, CML/18/2009, May 7, 2009, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmfaff/612/612.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2Vl6lA11JX4Je_uFwWbA_YvT1j84e82iXgk3JkHve-VL8hFdTC7S1WICs.United KingdomForeign Affairs Committee, House of Commons, 2019, China and the Rules-Based International System Sixteenth Report of Session 2017–19, https://Publications.parliament.uk/Pa/cm201719/Cmselect/Cmfaff/612/612.Pdf?Fbclid=IwAR0SJBQFCGEw3ljSz20z9Xarxbkko5ZbFdZRo2aroayjhynrCGwWJnzX7Ng.Government of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands. “Frequently Asked Questions.” Government of South Georgia & the South Sandwich Islands, www.gov.gs/information/frequently-asked-questions.United StatesDepartment of Defense, US. “Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.” Department of Defense, May 15, 2015, dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2017_China_Military_Power_Report.PDF.Pompeo, Michael R. “U.S. Position on Maritime Claims in the South China Sea - United States Department of State.” U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of State, July 13, 2020, www.state.gov/u-s-position-on-maritime-claims-in-the-south-china-sea.The White House. “Remarks by Vice President Pence on the Administration`s Policy Toward China.” The White House, The United States Government, October 4, 2018, www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-vice-president-pence-administrations-policy-toward-china.Wong, Alex N. “Briefing on The Indo-Pacific Strategy–United States Department of State.” U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of State, April 2, 2020, www.state.gov/briefing-on-the-indo-pacific-strategy.US Navy. “Display-FactFiles.” Aircraft Carriers - CVN > United States Navy > Displayy-Fact Files, www.navy.mil/Resources/Fact-Files/Display-FactFiles/Article/2169795/aircraft-carriers-cvn.Reports and PerspectivesHoang, Thi Ha, “Pitfalls for ASEAN in Negotiating a Code of Conduct in the South China Sea,” Perspective No. 57, Researchers at Iseas–Yusof Ishak Institute Analyse Current Events, July 23, 2019.Le, Hong Hiep, “Vietnam’s Position on the South China Sea Code of Conduct,” Perspective No. 22, Researchers at Iseas–Yusof Ishak Institute Analyse Current Events, April 4, 8, 2019.Kreuzer, Peter. Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, Dealing with China in the South China Sea: Duterte Changing Course, 2018.Peng, Edgar. ‘“Same-Same but Different’: Laos and Cambodia’s Political Embrace of China,” Perspective No. 66, Researchers at Iseas–Yusof Ishak Institute Analyse Current Events, September 5, 2017.Storey, Ian. “Assessing the ASEAN-China Framework for the Code of Conduct for the South China Sea,” Perspective No.62, Researchers at Iseas–Yusof Ishak Institute Analyse Current Events, August 8, 2017.International Treaties/Conventions and CasesConvention on the Law of the Sea, December 10, 1982, 1833 U.N.T.S. 397. Eritrea v Yemen, Award on Territorial Sovereignty and Scope of the Dispute, (1998) XXII RIAA 211, (1999) 119 ILR 1, (2001) 40 ILM 900, ICGJ 379 (PCA 1998), October 9, 1998, Permanent Court of Arbitration.South China Sea Arbitration, Philippines v China, Award, PCA Case No 2013-19, ICGJ 495 (PCA 2016), July 12, 2016, Permanent Court of Arbitration. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
法律學系
104651014資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104651014 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 陳貞如 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Chen-Ju en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 宋高祖 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Claus Soong en_US dc.creator (作者) 宋高祖 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Soong, Claus en_US dc.date (日期) 2020 en_US dc.date.accessioned 2-Mar-2021 14:35:21 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 2-Mar-2021 14:35:21 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Mar-2021 14:35:21 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0104651014 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/134095 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 法律學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 104651014 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文主張，二零一六中菲南海仲裁案就南海問題法制化並海洋法公約一二一條三款的解釋不單為中菲兩國，也同時為其他聲索國在南海的紛爭提供了清晰的法律基礎。本文認為，仲裁案就海洋法公約的解釋構成了某種意義上的軟法，並為海洋法公約架構下南海相關以及其他未來類似案例提供指引。政治意義上而言，仲裁案為觀察國際法如何影響國際關係，特別是像中國與國際規範體系、東協與區域整合、中美關係惡化下的對峙等議題提供了新的視角。在區域層級上，藉由中國在仲裁結果公布後與東協成員國進行南海行為準則（CoC）協商而觀，仲裁案確有促進區域協調合作之效果，形成軟法以避免各相關國之間產生進一步衝突的可能。惟就此項趨勢而言，因中國以制度主義的方式實踐其現實主義下零和性的擴張式國家利益，南海行為準則此一規範之形成，實際上更加是往國際法律秩序碎片化的方向發展。對於菲律賓與越南而言，由仲裁案所帶來的法律解釋和澄清的海洋權利使得同北京的談判有更多籌碼。同時，美國在區域中的存在對於規模較小的聲索國面對中國時非常重要。但河內與馬尼拉也擔心對於華盛頓對南海區域秩序中是否有足夠的意願做出承諾，且是否願意支持其盟友對抗中國的擴張性行為。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) This thesis argued that by clarifying the Article 121(3) of UNCLOS, the 2016 South China Sea Arbitration provided a clear legal basis on the disputes that exist not just between China and the Philippines but also among other claimant states through the legalization of the South China Sea. The interpretations made by the Arbitration constitute a kind of soft law, which has influence within the framework of UNCLOS and provides guidance for future decisions beyond disputes in the South China Sea. Politically, the Arbitration offered a new dimension to observe how international law can shape the development of international relations, especially in issues areas such as China and the international rule-based system, ASEAN and regionalization, and the confrontations under worsening US–China relations. At the regional level, through Chinese behaviors and its negotiation with ASEAN on the development of the CoC, the Arbitration did foster regional coordination to cooperate on soft law to avoid further conflict among states. However, such development has seemed to lead toward fragmentation of the international legal order as China is using the means of institutionalism to realize its expansive national interest in a realist zero-sum sense. For Vietnam and Philippines, the leverage supplied by the Arbitration has provided a higher bargaining margin when negotiating with Beijing. Also, the US presence in the region is important for the smaller claimant states when facing China. However, Manila and Hanoi are concerned on how the United States would position itself in the region, how committed Washington is to the regional order, and how willing it is to support its allies to confront China’s expansive behaviors. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents List of Figures and Table viAcknowledgements viiAbstract ixAbstract in Chinese xChapter 1: Introduction 11. Main Questions and the Geographic Scope of Research 42. Geopolitics in the South China Sea under US–China Competition 93. Legalization: How Does the Interaction Between IL and IR Work? 124. The IL and IR Approach, Methodology, and Framework 15Chapter 2: International Law under International Relations Perspectives 191. Realism and Anarchy 212. Liberalism, Institutionalist Perspective, and Global Governance 253. Constructivist Approach 314. UNCLOS As an International Regime 35Chapter 3: The China-US Relations and the South China Sea 391. China-US Relations and the New Cold War 422. China’s Grand Strategy Under Xi-Jinping 493. The US Hegemonic Position and its Grand Strategy on China 544. China-US Competition in the South China Sea 61Chapter 4: Background and History of the 2016 Arbitration 651. Overview of the South China Sea Dispute 662. The Arbitration and Its Aftermath 693. Territorial Disputes and Marine Claims in the South China Sea 72Chapter 5: Selected Issues of the Arbitration 771. The Nine-Dash Line 772. The Regime of Islands 823. The Effectiveness of the Arbitration 86Chapter 6: Arbitration and the Reshaped Interests of Claimant States 971. Legal Interests 982. Political Interests 103Chapter 7: Geopolitical Impacts and Developments after the Arbitration 1171. Policy Options of Claimant States 1182. ASEAN’s Coordination and the Development of the CoC 125Chapter 8: Conclusion 132Appendix 139Appendix 1: Interview with Mr. Nguyễn Thế Phương 139Appendix 2: Interview with Dr. Jay Batongbacal 142Bibliography 146 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2414340 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104651014 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 南海仲裁案 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中美關係 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 菲律賓 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 越南 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 聯合國海洋法公約 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 2016 South China Sea Arbitration en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) China-U.S. Relations en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Philippines en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Vietnam en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) UNCLOS en_US dc.title (題名) 論國際法與國際關係之互動：以 2016年中菲南海仲裁案地緣政治之影響為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Implications of the 2016 Arbitration on Geopolitics in the South China Sea: the Interaction Between International Law and International Relations en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Books and ChaptersAbbott, Kenneth Wayne, and Duncan Snidal. “Law, Legalization and Politics: An Agenda for the Next Generation of IR-IL Scholars.” Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, Cambridge University Press, 2013.Acharya, Amitav. “Rethinking Demand, Purpose and Progress in Global Governance: An Introduction.” Why Govern? Rethinking Demand and Progress in Global Governance, by Amitav Acharya, Cambridge University Press, 2016.Amitav, Acharya. “Thinking Theoretically about Asian IR.” International Relations of Asia, edited by David Shambaugh and Michael Yahuda, Rowman & Littlefield, 2014.Armstrong, James David, et al. International Law and International Relations. 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2012.Batongbacal, Jay L. “Philippines’ Legal Policy Options and Future Prospects.” South China Sea Lawfare: Post-Arbitration Policy Options and Future Prospects, edited by Fu-Kuo Liu, South China Sea Think Tank, 2017.Baviera, Alieen S. P. “The Philippines and the South China Sea Dispute: Security Interests and Perspective.” The South China Sea Dispute: Navigating Diplomatic and Strategic Tensions, edited by Ian Storey and Zhengyi Lin, ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, 2016.Beckman, Robert. “International Law, UNCLOS and the South China Sea.” Beyond Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea: Legal Frameworks for the Joint Development of Hydrocarbon Resources, edited by Robert Beckman, Edward Elgar, 2013.Beckman, Robert. “Jurisdictional Issues in the South China Sea Arbitration.” South China Sea Arbitration: The Legal Dimension, edited by S. Jayakumar, Edward Elgar, 2018.Brown, Chris. Sovereignty, Rights, and Justice: International Political Theory Today. Polity Press, 2006.Brown, Kerry. China`s World: The Foreign Policy of the World`s Newest Superpower. I.B. Tauris,, 2017.Brunnée, Jutta, and Stephen J. Toope. “Constructivism and International Law.” Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, Cambridge University Press, 2013.DeLisle, Jacques, and Avery Goldstein, eds. China`s Global Engagement: Cooperation, Competition, and Influence in the 21st Century. Brookings Institution Press, 2017.Dill, Janina. Legitimate Targets? Social Construction, International Law and US Bombing. Cambridge University Press, 2015.Đỗ Thanh Hải. Vietnam and the South China Sea: Politics, Security, and Legality. Routledge, 2019.Dodge, William S. “Res Judicata.” SSRN, Oxford Public International Law, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, May 12, 2016, ssrn.com/abstract=2778726.Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Mark A. Pollack. “International Law and International Relations.” Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, Cambridge University Press, 2013.Finnemore, Martha. National Interests in International Society. Cornell University Press, 1996.Franckx, Eric. “The Arbitral Tribunal’s Interpretation of Paragraph 3 in Article 121: A First but Important Step Forward.” South China Sea Arbitration: The Legal Dimension, edited by S. Jayakumar, Edward Elgar, 2018.Franckx, Eric. “The Award of 12 July 2016 and Its Impact on the Clarification of Article 121 (3) LOSC.” Islands and Rocks in the South China Sea: Post-Hague Ruling, by James Borton, Xlibris, 2017.Friedberg, Aaron L. A Contest for Supremacy: China, America, and the Struggle for Mastery in Asia. WW Norton & Company, 2011.Goh, Evelyn. The Struggle for Order: Hegemony, Hierarchy, and Transition in Post-Cold War East Asia. Oxford University Press, 2013.Heydarian, Richard Javad. “Philippines’ Diplomatic Policy Options and Future Prospects.” South China Sea Lawfare: Post-Arbitration Policy Options and Future Prospects, edited by Fu-Kuo Liu, South China Sea Think Tank, 2017.Hurrell, Andrew. On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford University Press, 2007.Jeong, Gab Yong. “A Study of the China’s ‘Nine-Dash’ Line: The Award of PCA.” Islands and Rocks in the South China Sea: Post-Hague Ruling, edited by James Borton, Place of Publication Not Identified, 2017.Jayakumar, S., et al. South China Sea Arbitration: The Legal Dimension. Edward Elgar, 2018.Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press, 1984.Keohane, Robert O. Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World. Routledge, 2002.Koremenos, Barbara. “Institutionalism and International Law.” Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Mark A. Pollack and Jeffrey L. Dunoff, Cambridge University Press, 2013.Kraska, James. Maritime Power and the Law of the Sea Expeditionary Operations in World Politics. Oxford University Press, 2011.Krasner, Stephen D. “Problematic Sovereignty.” Problematic Sovereignty Contested Rules and Political Possibilities, Columbia University Press, 2001.Li, Guateng. The Sea without Disputes: The Distorted History of South China Sea (SCS) before 1900 (Bei Niu Qu De Nan Hai Shi: Er Shi Shi Ji Qian De Nan Zhong Guo Hai 被扭曲的南海史：二十世紀前的南中國海)). Wu Nan, 2016.Llamzon, Alyosius. “The Juridical Island: From the Island of Palmas to the South China Sea.” Islands and Rocks in the South China Sea: Post-Hague Ruling, edited by James Borton, Xlibris, 2017.Mitter, Rana. “Chinese Ideas of Order and Justice.” Order and Justice in International Relations, edited by Rosemary Foot et al., Oxford University Press, 2003.Moravcsik, Andrew. “Liberal Theories of International Law.” Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, Cambridge University Press, 2013.Morgenthau, Hans J., et al. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. McGraw Hill Higher Education, 1985.Nong, Hong. “China’s Legal Policy Options and Future Prospects.” South China Sea Lawfare: Post-Arbitration Policy Options and Future Prospects, edited by Fu-Kuo Liu, South China Sea Think Tank, 2017.Nordquist, Myron H. “UNCLOS Article 121 and Itu Aba in the South China Sea Final Award: A Correct Interpretation?” The South China Sea Arbitration: The Legal Dimension, edited by S. Jayakumar et al., Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.Posen, Barry R. Restraint: A New Foundation for US Grand Strategy. Cornell University Press, 2014.Reus-Smit, Christian. “Constructivism and the English School.” Theorising International Society: English School Methods, edited by Cornelia Navari, Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Reus-Smit, Christian. “The Politics of International Law.” The Politics of International Law, edited by Christian Reus-Smit, Cambridge University Press, 2004.Robinson, James A., and Daron Acemoglu. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. Profile, 2012.Roy, Denny. “The United States and the South China Sea: Front Line of the Hegemonic Tension?” The South China Sea Dispute: Navigating Diplomatic and Strategic Tensions, edited by Ian Storey and Zhengyi Lin, ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, 2016.Shaffer, Gregory, and Mark A. Pollack. “Hard Law and Soft Law.” Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, Cambridge University Press, 2013.Shambaugh, David L. China goes Global: The Partial Power. Oxford University Press, 2013.Shaw, Malcolm N. International Law. Cambridge University Press, 2008.Spangler, Jonathan. “South China Sea Policy Options in the Post-Arbitration Context.” South China Sea Lawfare: Post-Arbitration Policy Options and Future Prospects, edited by Fu-Kuo Liu, South China Sea Think Tank, 2017.Steinberg, Richard H. “Wanted Dead or Alive: Realism in International Law.” Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, Cambridge University Press, 2013.Storey, Ian, and Zhengyi Lin. “Introduction.” The South China Sea Dispute: Navigating Diplomatic and Strategic Tensions, edited by Ian Storey and Zhengyi Lin, ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, 2016.Storey, Ian. “Rising Tension in the South China Sea: Southeast Asian Responses.” The South China Sea Dispute: Navigating Diplomatic and Strategic Tensions, edited by Ian Storey and Zhengyi Lin, ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, 2016.Talmon, Stefan, and Bing Bing. Jia. “Introduction.” The South China Sea Arbitration: A Chinese Perspective, edited by Stefan Talmon and Bing Bing. Jia, Hart, 2014.Talmon, Stefan. “The South China Sea Arbitration: Is There a Case to Answer?” The South China Sea Arbitration: a Chinese Perspective, edited by Stefan Talmon and Bing Bing. Jia, Hart, 2014..Vu, Truong- Minh, and Thank Trung Nguyen. “Vietnam’s Policy Options and Future Prospects.” South China Sea Lawfare: Post-Arbitration Policy Options and Future Prospects, by Fu-Kuo Liu, South China Sea Think Tank, 2017.Waltz, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics, McGraw-Hill, 1979.Wan, Ming. The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: The Construction of Power and the Struggle for the East Asian International Order. Springer, 2016.Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press, 1999.Yan, Xue tong, et al. Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power, Princeton University Press, 2013.Yan, Yan. “China’s Diplomatic Policy Options and Future Prospects.” South China Sea Lawfare: Post-Arbitration Policy Options and Future Prospects, edited by Fu-Kuo Liu, South China Sea Think Tank, 2017.Journal ArticlesAbbott, Kenneth W. “Modem International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers.” Yale Journal of International Law, vol. 14, no. 2, 1989.Abbott, Kenneth W., et al. “The Concept of Legalization.” International Organization, vol. 54, no. 3, 2000.Axelrod, Robert, and Robert O. Keohane. “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” World Politics, vol. 38, no. 1, 1985.Chinese Society of International Law, “The South China Sea Arbitration Awards: A Critical Study,” Chinese Journal of International Law, vol. 17, no. 2, 2018.Chan, Jane. “Singapore and the South China Sea: Being an Effective Coordinator and Honest Broker.” Asia Policy, vol. 21, no. 1, 2016, p. 44.Chung, Chris P. C. “Drawing the U-Shaped Line.” Modern China, vol. 42, no. 1, 2016.Fravel, M. Taylor. “China`s Strategy in the South China Sea.” Contemporary Southeast Asia, vol. 33, no. 3, 2011.Friedberg, Aaron L. “The Sources of Chinese Conduct: Explaining Beijing`s Assertiveness.” The Washington Quarterly, vol. 37, no 4, 2014.Friedberg, Aaron L. “Globalisation and Chinese Grand Strategy.” Survival vol. 60, no. 1, 2018.Gamble, John King. “The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea as Soft Law.” Houston Journal of International Law, vol. 8, no. 1, 1985.Gao, Zhiguo, and Bing Bing. Jia. “The Nine-Dash Line in The South China Sea: History, Status, and Implications.” The American Journal of International Law, vol. 107, no. 1, 2013.Gau, Michael Sheng-Ti. “The Interpretation of Article 121(3) of UNCLOS by the Tribunal for the South China Sea Arbitration: A Critique.” Ocean Development & International Law, vol. 50, no. 1, 2019.Glaser, Charles L. “Realists as Optimists: Cooperation as Self-Help.” International Security, vol. 19, no. 3, 1994.Goldstein, Avery. “Power Transitions, Institutions, and China`s Rise in East Asia: Theoretical Expectations and Evidence.” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 30, no. 4-5, 2007.Goldstein, Avery. “China`s Grand Strategy under Xi Jinping: Reassurance, Reform, and Resistance.” International Security vol. 45, no. 1, 2020.Guzman, Andrew T. “Against Consent.” SSRN Electronic Journal, Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 52, no. 4, 2012.Ikenberry, G. John. “From Hegemony to the Balance of Power: the Rise of China and American Grand Strategy in East Asia.” International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, vol. 23, no 2, 2014.Ikenberry, G. John. “The End of Liberal International Order?.” International Affairs, vol. 94, no. 1, 2018.Johnston, Alastair Iain. “How New and Assertive is China`s New Assertiveness?.” International Security vol, 37, no. 4, 2013.Krasner, Stephen D. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables.” International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2, 1982.Li, Mingjiang. “Reconciling Assertiveness and Cooperation? China’s Changing Approach to the South China Sea Dispute.” Security Challenges, vol. 6, no. 2, 2010.Macmillan, John. “Liberalism and the Democratic Peace.” Review of International Studies, vol. 30, no. 2, 2004.Nguyen Thi, Lan Anh. “The South China Sea Award: Legal Implications for Vietnam.” Contemporary Southeast Asia, vol. 38, no. 3, 2016.Nguyen, Hong Thao. “Vietnam’s Position on the Sovereignty over the Paracels and the Spratlys: Its Maritime Claims.” Journal of East Asia and International Law, vol. 5, no. 1, 2012.Nincic, Miroslav. “The National Interest and Its Interpretation.” The Review of Politics, vol. 61, no. 1, 1999.Perry, Elizabeth J. “China in 1992: An Experiment in Neo-authoritarianism.” Asian Survey, vol. 33, no. 1, 1993.Phan, Hao Duy, and Lan Ngoc Nguyen. “The South China Sea Arbitration: Bindingness, Finality, and Compliance with UNCLOS Dispute Settlement Decisions.” Asian Journal of International Law, vol. 8, no. 1, 2017.Reus-Smit, Christian. “The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions.” International Organization, vol. 51, no. 4, 1997.Roy, Denny. “Southeast Asia and China: Balancing or Bandwagoning?.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, vol. 27, no. 2, 2005.Shambaugh, David. “China engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order.” International Security, vol. 29, no. 3, 2004.Swaine, Michael D. “China’s Assertive Behavior: Part One: On ‘Core Interests.” China Leadership Monitor vol. 34. no. 22, 2011.Talmon, Stefan. “The South China Sea Arbitration and the Finality of ‘Final’ Awards.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement, vol. 8, no. 2, 2017.Tønnesson, Stein. “The South China Sea in the Age of European Decline.” Modern Asian Studies, vol. 40, no. 1, 2006.Tsai, Chi-ting and Wei-hua Chen. China’s Response to the Legalization of the South China Sea Arbitration (Zhōngguó duì nánhǎi zhòngcái àn fǎzhì huà zhī huíyīng 中國對南海仲裁案法制化之回應), Prospect Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 1, 2017.Wendt, Alexander. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: the Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, 1992.Wendt, Alexander. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security, vol. 20, no. 1, 1995.Yoshihara, Toshi. “China`s Vision of Its Seascape: the First Island Chain and Chinese Seapower.” Asian Politics & Policy, vol. 4, no. 3, 2012.Zou, Keyuan. “China`s U-Shaped Line in the South China Sea Revisited.” Ocean Development & International Law, vol. 43, no. 1, 2012.Zou, Keyuan. “Historic Rights in International Law and in China`s Practice.” Ocean Development & International Law, vol. 32, no. 2, 2001.News Reports and ArticlesAssociated Press. “Recent Developments Surrounding the South China Sea.” The Diplomat, January 14, 2020, thediplomat.com/2020/01/recent-developments-surrounding-the-south-china-sea.Gutierrez, Jason, and Hannah Beech. “Sinking of Philippine Boat Puts South China Sea Back at Issue.” The New York Times, June 13, 2019, www.nytimes.com/2019/06/13/world/asia/south-china-sea-philippines.htmlGladstone, Rick. “How the Cold War Between China and U.S. Is Intensifying.” The New York Times, July 22, 2020, www.nytimes.com/2020/07/22/world/asia/us-china-cold-war.html.Huong, Huong Thu. “Vietnam Manages Delicate Balance between US and China.” Nikkei Asian Review, November 14, 2017, asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Trump-s-Asian-visit/Vietnam-manages-delicate-balance-between-US-and-China.Jennings, Ralph. “China Seen Holding Off Expansion in Disputed Sea Due to Closer Philippine Ties.” Voice of America, August 25, 2019, www.voanews.com/east-asia-pacific/china-seen-holding-expansion-disputed-sea-due-closer-philippine-ties.Jennings, Ralph. “How Vietnam Quietly Built Up 10 Islands in Asia’s Most Disputed Sea.” Voice of America, April 19, 2019, www.voanews.com/east-asia-pacific/how-vietnam-quietly-built-10-islands-asias-most-disputed-sea.Jennings, Ralph. “Philippine Trust in China Drops over South China Sea Activity.” Voice of America English News, August 25, 2019, learningenglish.voanews.com/a/philippine-trust-in-china-drops-over-south-china-sea-activity/5051752.html.Khmer Times. “Cambodia and Myanmar in Joint Stand on South China Sea Dispute.” Khmer Times, July 4, 2016, www.khmertimeskh.com/25448/cambodia-and-myanmar-in-joint-stand-on-south-china-sea-dispute/.Lewis , Mark. “Norway`s Salmon Rot as China Takes Revenge for Dissident`s Nobel Prize.” The Independent, October 23, 2011, www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/norways-salmon-rot-as-china-takes-revenge-for-dissidents-nobel-prize-2366167.html.Li, Jing. “首轮中美经济对话: 除上月球外主要问题均已谈及 (First Round of the Sino-US Economic Dialogue: In Addition to the Main Discussion of the Moon).” China News Online, July 29, 2009, www.chinanews.com/gn/news/2009/07-29/1794984.shtml.Liu, Xuanzun. “China`s Two Aircraft Carriers in Apparent Simultaneous Exercises for 1st Time: Reports.” Global Times, September 6, 2020, www.globaltimes.cn/content/1200053.shtml.Long, Drake. “Vietnamese, Philippine Fishermen Protest China`s Fishing Ban in SCS.” Radio Free Asia, May 4, 2020, https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/scs-fishing-05042020194837.html.Mie, Ayako. “Japan Steps up Rhetoric over Okinotorishima in Wake of Hague Ruling.” The Japan Times, July 15, 2016, www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/07/15/national/politics-diplomacy/japan-steps-rhetoric-okinotorishima-wake-hague-ruling.Mogato, Manuel. “ASEAN Deadlocked on South China Sea, Cambodia Blocks Statement.” Thomson Reuters, July 26, 2016, www.reuters.com/article/us-southchinasea-ruling-asean-idUSKCN1050F6.Ng, Teddy. “Philippines ‘Rebuilding Runway on South China Sea Island’.” South China Morning Post, May 26, 2018, www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2147935/philippines-rebuilding-runway-south-china-sea-island.Reuters. “Thailand `Supports` China`s Efforts to Maintain Maritime Peace.” Thomson Reuters, September 7, 2016, www.reuters.com/article/asean-summit-southchinasea-thailand-idUSL3N1BJ27A.Strait Times. “China to Expand Land Reclamation Activities in South China Sea, Say Experts.” The Straits Times, February 6, 2018, www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/china-to-expand-land-reclamation-activities-in-south-china-sea-say-experts.Zhou, Laura. “Beijing`s South China Sea Fishing Ban Threatens to Raise Tensions.” South China Morning Post, May 8, 2020, www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3083572/beijings-south-china-sea-fishing-ban-threatens-raise-tensions.Websites and BlogpostsAsia Maritime Transparency Initiative. “Arbitration Support Tracker.” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, June 16, 2016, amti.csis.org/arbitration-support-tracker.Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. “Vietnam’s Island Building: Double-Standard or Drop in the Bucket?” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, 2016, amti.csis.org/vietnams-island-building.Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. “Who`s Taking Sides on China`s Maritime Claims?” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, September 24, 2020, amti.csis.org/whos-taking-sides-on-chinas-maritime-claims.Brunnée, Jutta. “A Constructivist Theory of International Law?” EJIL Talk, September 23, 2015, www.ejiltalk.org/a-constructivist-theory-of-international-law.ChinaPower. “How Much Trade Transits the South China Sea?” ChinaPower Project, CSIS, October 10, 2019, chinapower.csis.org/much-trade-transits-south-china-sea.Guilfoyle, Douglas. “A New Twist in the South China Sea Arbitration: The Chinese Society of International Law’s Critical Study.” EJIL Talk, May 25, 2018, www.ejiltalk.org/a-new-twist-in-the-south-china-sea-arbitration-the-chinese-society-of-international-laws-critical-study.Ott, Marvin. “The South China Sea in Strategic Terms.” Wilson Center, May 14, 2019, www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/the-south-china-sea-strategic-terms.Overseas Base Realignment and Closure Coalition. “U.S. MILITARY BASES OVERSEAS: THE FACTS.’’, www.overseasbases.net/fact-sheet.html.Panda, Ankit. “China and South Korea: Examining the Resolution of the THAAD Impasse.” The Diplomat, November 13, 2017, thediplomat.com/2017/11/china-and-south-korea-examining-the-resolution-of-the-thaad-impasse.Parameswaran, Prashanth. “The Limits of Duterte’s US-China Rebalance.” The Diplomat, October 24, 2016, thediplomat.com/2016/10/the-limits-of-dutertes-us-china-rebalance.Rachman, Gideon. “A New Cold War: Trump, Xi and the Escalating US-China Confrontation.” Financial Times, October 5. 2020, www.ft.com/content/7b809c6a-f733-46f5-a312-9152aed28172.Sun, Tzu. “The Internet Classics Archive: The Art of War by Sun Tzu.” Translated by Lionel Giles, The Internet Classics Archive | The Art of War by Sun Tzu, classics.mit.edu/Tzu/artwar.html.The World Bank Group. “World Development Indicators.” DataBank. databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=2.Thayer, Carl. “A Closer Look at the ASEAN-China Single Draft South China Sea Code of Conduct.” The Diplomat, August 6, 2018, thediplomat.com/2018/08/a-closer-look-at-the-asean-china-single-draft-south-china-sea-code-of-conduct.Vu, Truong Minh, and Nguyen Thanh Trung. “Vietnam’s Need for a Post-Arbitration Policy.” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, August 18, 2016, amti.csis.org/vietnams-need-post-arbitration-policy.Government Statements and DocumentsChinaMinistry of Foreign Affairs, People’s Republic of China. “Statement of the Government of the People’s Republic of China on China’s Territorial Sovereignty and Maritime Rights and Interests in the South China Sea.” The South China Sea Issues, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the People’s Republic of China, July 12, 2016, www.fmprc.gov.cn/nanhai/eng/snhwtlcwj_1/t1379493.htm.People`s Daily. “习近平在第十二届全国人民代表大会第一次会议上的讲话 (Xi-Jinping’s Speech on the 1st Meeting of 12th National People Congress).’” People.cn, March 18, 2013, cpc.people.com.cn/n/2013/0318/c64094-20819130.html.Permanent Mission of the People’s Republic of China to the United Nations. “Note verbal the to the Secretary-General of United Nations”, CML/18/2009, May 7, 2009, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmfaff/612/612.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2Vl6lA11JX4Je_uFwWbA_YvT1j84e82iXgk3JkHve-VL8hFdTC7S1WICs.United KingdomForeign Affairs Committee, House of Commons, 2019, China and the Rules-Based International System Sixteenth Report of Session 2017–19, https://Publications.parliament.uk/Pa/cm201719/Cmselect/Cmfaff/612/612.Pdf?Fbclid=IwAR0SJBQFCGEw3ljSz20z9Xarxbkko5ZbFdZRo2aroayjhynrCGwWJnzX7Ng.Government of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands. “Frequently Asked Questions.” Government of South Georgia & the South Sandwich Islands, www.gov.gs/information/frequently-asked-questions.United StatesDepartment of Defense, US. “Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.” Department of Defense, May 15, 2015, dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2017_China_Military_Power_Report.PDF.Pompeo, Michael R. “U.S. Position on Maritime Claims in the South China Sea - United States Department of State.” U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of State, July 13, 2020, www.state.gov/u-s-position-on-maritime-claims-in-the-south-china-sea.The White House. “Remarks by Vice President Pence on the Administration`s Policy Toward China.” The White House, The United States Government, October 4, 2018, www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-vice-president-pence-administrations-policy-toward-china.Wong, Alex N. “Briefing on The Indo-Pacific Strategy–United States Department of State.” U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of State, April 2, 2020, www.state.gov/briefing-on-the-indo-pacific-strategy.US Navy. “Display-FactFiles.” Aircraft Carriers - CVN > United States Navy > Displayy-Fact Files, www.navy.mil/Resources/Fact-Files/Display-FactFiles/Article/2169795/aircraft-carriers-cvn.Reports and PerspectivesHoang, Thi Ha, “Pitfalls for ASEAN in Negotiating a Code of Conduct in the South China Sea,” Perspective No. 57, Researchers at Iseas–Yusof Ishak Institute Analyse Current Events, July 23, 2019.Le, Hong Hiep, “Vietnam’s Position on the South China Sea Code of Conduct,” Perspective No. 22, Researchers at Iseas–Yusof Ishak Institute Analyse Current Events, April 4, 8, 2019.Kreuzer, Peter. Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, Dealing with China in the South China Sea: Duterte Changing Course, 2018.Peng, Edgar. ‘“Same-Same but Different’: Laos and Cambodia’s Political Embrace of China,” Perspective No. 66, Researchers at Iseas–Yusof Ishak Institute Analyse Current Events, September 5, 2017.Storey, Ian. “Assessing the ASEAN-China Framework for the Code of Conduct for the South China Sea,” Perspective No.62, Researchers at Iseas–Yusof Ishak Institute Analyse Current Events, August 8, 2017.International Treaties/Conventions and CasesConvention on the Law of the Sea, December 10, 1982, 1833 U.N.T.S. 397. Eritrea v Yemen, Award on Territorial Sovereignty and Scope of the Dispute, (1998) XXII RIAA 211, (1999) 119 ILR 1, (2001) 40 ILM 900, ICGJ 379 (PCA 1998), October 9, 1998, Permanent Court of Arbitration.South China Sea Arbitration, Philippines v China, Award, PCA Case No 2013-19, ICGJ 495 (PCA 2016), July 12, 2016, Permanent Court of Arbitration. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202100179 en_US
