學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 數位助理之擬人化程度對社會距離與購買意願的影響
The Influence of Anthropomorphism on Social Distance and Purchase Intention
作者 張家欣
Chang, Chia-Hsin
貢獻者 彭志宏<br>梁定澎
Peng, Chih-Hung<br>Liang, Ting-Peng
張家欣
Chang, Chia-Hsin
關鍵詞 數位助理
擬人化
社會距離
購買意願
Anthropomorphism
Social Distance
Purchase Intention
日期 2021
上傳時間 2-九月-2021 15:59:05 (UTC+8)
摘要 個人化推薦是在電子商務中能夠增進顧客購買意願的一個方法,近年來,數位 助理在個人化服務有非常廣泛的應用。而數位助理有兩個重要的機制,一個是能夠 分析使用者偏好,提供相關資訊的個人化技術,另一個則是擬人化 (Anthropomorphism)的使用介面。
在個人化服務或是推薦的作法中,數位助理時常使用擬人化的元素與顧客進行 互動,尤其是最近社群網站如Facebook及Twitter等的興起,開啟了電子商務的新 方向,稱之為社群商務(social commerce)。而社群商務強調的是關係,也就是社會 距離的遠近,會影響顧客對於商品的購買意願。
近年來關於擬人化的研究日益增加,藉以瞭解擬人化元素應用在電子商務所能
產生的效果。而本研究欲以社會距離的觀點,來解釋數位助理背後的機制,是如何
透過擬人化介面與個人化推薦,縮短與顧客間的社會距離,以達到增進顧客購買意
願的效果。
參考文獻 中文文獻
1.乔 均,史慧慧 (2020)。品牌擬人化對消費者購買意愿的影響研究——基于心理距離和信息處理流暢性雙重視角。南京财经大学学报( 双月刊),2020 年第 5 期( 总第 225 期) 。
2.柴康偉,歐瑋明,林靖昇,施呈霖(2017)。服務品質與品牌形象對購買意願之影響。管理資訊計算,2017年第6卷特刊4,第122-131頁。
3.王欣瑜,許芷菱 (2018)。虛擬語音助理市場研究-以Siri與Google Assistant為例。2018第20屆科際整合管理研討會,6月9日,台北。
4.齐文娥,林 川(2018)。消費者生鮮農產品購買意愿影響因素分析。华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018 年第 1 期( 第 17 卷) 。
5.李 伟,蒋玉石,苗 苗,王钰灵 (2020)。基于不同视觉对象结构的拟人化广告形象生动性 对消费者产品态度影响研究。信息系统学报 第 22 辑,2020年,6月1號。
6.周伯瑄(2019)。烤箱人還是披薩人?產品擬人化與成效擬人化對消費者購買意願之影響。國立中興大學行銷學系碩士論文,台中市。
7.周梅华,李佩镅,牟宇鹏 (2015)。在線評論對消費者購買意愿的影響——心理距離的中介作用。软科学,2015 年 1 月·第 29 卷·第 1 期(总第 181 期) 。
8.洪明緯 (2016)。品牌擬人化類型對消費者購買意願之影響。國立中興大學行銷學系碩士論文,台中市。
9.蕭宇真(2020)。 人工智慧語音助理服務辨識程度與使用意願關聯之研究。國立臺北大學企業管理學系碩士論文,台北市。
10.衡书鹏,赵换方,孙丽君,周宗奎 (2019)。虚拟销售代理的拟人效应。心理科学进展 2019, Vol. 27, No. 5, 884–904
11.駱俞儒(2019)。機器人擬人化對服務品質的影響。銘傳大學國際企業學系碩士班 碩士論文 ,台北市。

英文文獻
1.Adam Waytz , Joy Heafner , Nicholas Epley (2014). The mind in the machine- Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 52 (2014) 113–117.
2.Aggarwal, P. and McGill, A.L. When brands seem human, do humans act like brands? Automatic behavioral priming effects of brand anthropomorphism. Journal of consumer research, 39, 2 (2011), 307–323.
3.Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of consumer research, 34(4), 468-479.
4.Ben Sheehan, Hyun Seung Jin, Udo Gottlieb(2020). Customer service chatbots: Anthropomorphism and adoption. Journal of Business Research 115 (2020) 14–24
5.Blanca Hernández-Ortega(2018). Don’t believe strangers: Online consumer reviews and the role of social psychological distance. Information & Management 55 (2018) 31–50
6.Bray, J. P., 2008. Consumer Behaviour Theory: Approaches and Models. Discussion Paper. Unpublished. (Unpublished)
7.Carol F. Surprenant, Michael R. Solomon(1987). Predictability and Personalization in the Service Encounter. Journal of Marketing. First Published April 1, 1987
8.Christoph Bartneck · Dana Kulic ́ · Elizabeth Croft · Susana Zoghbi(2009) Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots. International Journal of Social Robot (2009) 1: 71–81
9.Cyrus Shahabi, Farnoush Banaei-Kashani (2003). Efficient and Anonymous Web-Usage Mining for Web Personalization. Informs Journal on Computing 15(2):123-147
10.DiSalvo, C., & Gemperle, F. (2003, June). From seduction to fulfillment: the use of anthropomorphic form in design. In Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces (pp. 67-72).
11.Duffy, Brian R. "Anthropomorphism and the social robot." Robotics and autonomous systems 42.3-4 (2003): 177-190.
12.Feiyang Wang, Frédéric Basso(2019). “Animals are friends, not food”: Anthropomorphism leads to less favorable attitudes toward meat consumption by inducing feelings of anticipatory guilt. Appetite 138 (2019) 153–173
13.Gianluigi Guido, Alessandro M. Peluso (2014). Brand anthropomorphism: Conceptualization, measurement, and impact on brand personality and loyalty. Journal of Brand Management Vol. 22, 1, 1–19
14.Izak Benbasat, Angelika Dimoka, Paul A. Pavlou, Lingyun Qiu(2020).The role of demographic similarity in people`s decision to interact with online anthropomorphic recommendation agents: Evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 133 (2020) 56–70
15.Jaehoon Lee and L. J. Shrum. (2012). Conspicuous Consumption versus Charitable Behavior in Response to Social Exclusion: A Differential Needs Explanation. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 39, No. 3 (October 2012), pp. 530-544
16.Kar Yan Tam, Shuk Ying Ho. “Understanding the Impact of Web Personalization on User Information Processing and Decision Outcomes”,MIS Quarterly , Dec., 2006, Vol. 30, No. 4 (Dec., 2006), pp. 865-890
17.Kim, S., & McGill, A. L. (2011). Gaming with Mr. Slot or gaming the slot machine? Power, anthropomorphism, and risk perception. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 94-107.
18.Kwak, H., Puzakova, M., & Rocereto, J. F. (2015). Better not smile at the price: The differential role of brand anthropomorphization on perceived price fairness. Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 56-76.
19.L Eroglu, B Caglayan(1997). ANXIOLYTIC AND ANTIDEPRESSANT PROPERTIES OF METHYLENE BLUE IN ANIMAL MODELS.
20.Laksmidewi, D., Susianto, H., and Afiff, A.Z. (2017). Anthropomorphism in advertising: The effect of anthropomorphic product demonstration on consumer purchase intention. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 22(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2017.22.1.1
21.Landwehr, J. R., McGill, A. L., & Herrmann, A. (2011). It`s got the look: The effect of friendly and aggressive “facial” expressions on product liking and sales. Journal of marketing, 75(3), 132-146.
22.Li Gong(2008). How social is social responses to computers? The function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations. Computers in Human Behavior 24 (2008) 1494–1509
23.Lingyun Qiu & Izak Benbasat (2009) Evaluating Anthropomorphic Product Recommendation Agents: A Social Relationship Perspective to Designing Information Systems, Journal of Management Information Systems, 25:4, 145-182, DOI: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222250405
24.Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of experimental social psychology, 44(5), 1256-1269.
25.Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., and Liberman, N. Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of experimental social psychology, 44, 5 (2008), 1256–1269.
26.Martin Holzwarth, Chris Janiszewski, & Marcus M. Neumann(2006). The Influence of Avatars on Online Consumer Shopping Behavior. Journal of Marketing, October 2006
27.Min Chung Han (2021). The Impact of Anthropomorphism on Consumers’ Purchase Decision in Chatbot Commerce, Journal of Internet Commerce, 20:1, 46-65, DOI: 10.1080/15332861.2020.1863022
28.Nass, C., Moon, Y., and Green, N. Are machines gender neutral? Gender-stereotypic responses to computers with voices. Journal of applied social psychology, 27, 10 (1997), 864–876.
29.Nicholas Epley, Adam Waytz, and John T. Cacioppo (2007). On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism. Psychological Review Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association 2007, Vol. 114, No. 4, 864–886
30.Park RE.(1924). The Concept of Social Distance : As applied to the Study of Racial Relations. Journal of Applied Sociology 8(July-August), 339-334, 1924
31.Pharmacological research Volume 36, Issue 5, November 1997, Pages 381-385
32.Qiu, L. and Benbasat, I. Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents: A social relationship perspective to designing information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 4 (2009), 145–182.
33.Ray L. (Ray Louis) Benedicktus. (2008). Psychological Distance Perceptions and Trust Beliefs for Internet Only and Hybrid Retailers: Implications for Marketers. A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Marketingin partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
34.Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge university press.
35.Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(9), 677–688.
36.Shuk Ying Ho and David Bodoff (2014). The Effects of Web Personalization on User Attitude and Behavior. MIS Quarterly , Vol. 38, No. 2 (June 2014), pp. 497-520, A1-A10
37.Steven M. Edwards, Jin Kyun Lee, and Carrie La Ferle. (2009). Does Place Matter When Shopping Online? Perceptions of Similarity and Familiarity as Indicators of Psychological Distance. Journal of Interactive Advertising, Vol 10 No 1 (Fall 2009), pp. 35-50
38.TP Liang, HY Chen, E Turban (2009). Effect of personalization on the perceived usefulness of online customer services: a dual-core theory. International Conference on E-Commerce
39.Trope, Y., Liberman, N., and Wakslak, C. Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of consumer psychology, 17, 2 (2007), 83–95.
40.Wang, L.C., Baker, J., Wagner, J.A., and Wakefield, K. Can a retail web site be social? Journal of Marketing, 71, 3 (2007), 143–157.
41.Waytz, A., Heafner, J., and Epley, N. The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, (2014), 113–117.
42.Waytz, A., Morewedge, C.K., Epley, N., Monteleone, G., Gao, J.-H., and Cacioppo, J.T. Making sense by making sentient: effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism. Journal of personality and social psychology, 99, 3 (2010), 410.
43.Waytz, Adam, Joy Heafner, and Nicholas Epley. "The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 52 (2014): 113-117.
44.Wen Wan, E., Peng Chen, R., & Jin, L. (2017). Judging a book by its cover? The effect of anthropomorphism on product attribute processing and consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 1008-1030.
45.Wenhuan Wang (2017). Smartphones as Social Actors? Social dispositional factors in assessing anthropomorphism. Computers in Human Behavior 68 (2017) 334 - 344
46.William B. Dodds, Kent B. Monroe and Dhruv Grewal (1991). Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers` Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research , Aug., 1991, Vol. 28, No. 3 (Aug., 1991), pp. 307- 319
47.Xinge Li, Yongjun Sung(2021). Anthropomorphism brings us closer : The mediating role of psychological distance in User–AI assistant interactions. Computers in Human Behavior 118 (2021) 106680
48.Yili Hong , Paul A. Pavlou, Nan Shi, Kanliang Wang. “ON THE ROLE OF FAIRNESS AND SOCIAL DISTANCE IN DESIGNING EFFECTIVE SOCIAL REFERRAL SYSTEMS”, MIS Quarterly Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 787-809/September 2017
49.Youjeong Kim , S. Shyam Sundar (2012). Anthropomorphism of computers: Is it mindful or mindless? Computers in Human Behavior 28 (2012) 241–250.
50.Yuan, L. and Dennis, A.R. Acting Like Humans? Anthropomorphism and Consumer’s Willingness to Pay in Electronic Commerce. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 2 (2019), 450–477.
51.Yunkyung Kim a,n, Bilge Mutlu (2014)How social distance shapes human–robot interaction. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 72 (2014) 783–795
52.Yu-Wen Li (2009). Personalization as a Strategy to Build Customer Relationship: The Role of Intimacy. PACIS 2009 Doctoral Consortium Nomination Information Form
53.Zhang, T., Zhu, B., Lee, L., and Kaber, D., 2008. Service Robot Anthropomorphism and Interface Design for Emotion in Human-robot Interaction, IEEE International Conference in Automation Science and Engineering, 674-679.
54.Zhao, M. and Xie, J., “Effects of Social and Temporal Distance on Consumers` Responses to Peer Recommendations,” Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XLVIII (June 2011), 486–496.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
資訊管理學系
108356030
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108356030
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 彭志宏<br>梁定澎zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Peng, Chih-Hung<br>Liang, Ting-Pengen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 張家欣zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Chang, Chia-Hsinen_US
dc.creator (作者) 張家欣zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chang, Chia-Hsinen_US
dc.date (日期) 2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2-九月-2021 15:59:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-九月-2021 15:59:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-九月-2021 15:59:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0108356030en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136852-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 資訊管理學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 108356030zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 個人化推薦是在電子商務中能夠增進顧客購買意願的一個方法,近年來,數位 助理在個人化服務有非常廣泛的應用。而數位助理有兩個重要的機制,一個是能夠 分析使用者偏好,提供相關資訊的個人化技術,另一個則是擬人化 (Anthropomorphism)的使用介面。
在個人化服務或是推薦的作法中,數位助理時常使用擬人化的元素與顧客進行 互動,尤其是最近社群網站如Facebook及Twitter等的興起,開啟了電子商務的新 方向,稱之為社群商務(social commerce)。而社群商務強調的是關係,也就是社會 距離的遠近,會影響顧客對於商品的購買意願。
近年來關於擬人化的研究日益增加,藉以瞭解擬人化元素應用在電子商務所能
產生的效果。而本研究欲以社會距離的觀點,來解釋數位助理背後的機制,是如何
透過擬人化介面與個人化推薦,縮短與顧客間的社會距離,以達到增進顧客購買意
願的效果。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 摘要 5
第一章 緒論 6
第一節 研究背景與動機 6
第二節 研究目的 10
第三節 研究流程 11
第二章 文獻探討 12
第一節 擬人化(Anthropomorphism) 12
第二節 社會距離 18
第三節 購買意願 20
第三章 研究架構與方法 23
第一節 研究架構 23
第二節 研究假說 23
第三節 研究方法 27
第四節 實驗設計 30
第四章 研究結果與分析 37
第一節 資料收集與樣本結構分析 38
第二節 樣本檢驗與信效度分析 41
第三節 研究假說檢定44
第四節 研究結果彙整 46
第五章 研究結論與貢獻 48
第一節 研究結論 48
第二節 研究貢獻 51
第三節 研究限制與建議 53
參考文獻 54
附錄 61
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 2475750 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108356030en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 數位助理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 擬人化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會距離zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 購買意願zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Anthropomorphismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social Distanceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Purchase Intentionen_US
dc.title (題名) 數位助理之擬人化程度對社會距離與購買意願的影響zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Influence of Anthropomorphism on Social Distance and Purchase Intentionen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻
1.乔 均,史慧慧 (2020)。品牌擬人化對消費者購買意愿的影響研究——基于心理距離和信息處理流暢性雙重視角。南京财经大学学报( 双月刊),2020 年第 5 期( 总第 225 期) 。
2.柴康偉,歐瑋明,林靖昇,施呈霖(2017)。服務品質與品牌形象對購買意願之影響。管理資訊計算,2017年第6卷特刊4,第122-131頁。
3.王欣瑜,許芷菱 (2018)。虛擬語音助理市場研究-以Siri與Google Assistant為例。2018第20屆科際整合管理研討會,6月9日,台北。
4.齐文娥,林 川(2018)。消費者生鮮農產品購買意愿影響因素分析。华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018 年第 1 期( 第 17 卷) 。
5.李 伟,蒋玉石,苗 苗,王钰灵 (2020)。基于不同视觉对象结构的拟人化广告形象生动性 对消费者产品态度影响研究。信息系统学报 第 22 辑,2020年,6月1號。
6.周伯瑄(2019)。烤箱人還是披薩人?產品擬人化與成效擬人化對消費者購買意願之影響。國立中興大學行銷學系碩士論文,台中市。
7.周梅华,李佩镅,牟宇鹏 (2015)。在線評論對消費者購買意愿的影響——心理距離的中介作用。软科学,2015 年 1 月·第 29 卷·第 1 期(总第 181 期) 。
8.洪明緯 (2016)。品牌擬人化類型對消費者購買意願之影響。國立中興大學行銷學系碩士論文,台中市。
9.蕭宇真(2020)。 人工智慧語音助理服務辨識程度與使用意願關聯之研究。國立臺北大學企業管理學系碩士論文,台北市。
10.衡书鹏,赵换方,孙丽君,周宗奎 (2019)。虚拟销售代理的拟人效应。心理科学进展 2019, Vol. 27, No. 5, 884–904
11.駱俞儒(2019)。機器人擬人化對服務品質的影響。銘傳大學國際企業學系碩士班 碩士論文 ,台北市。

英文文獻
1.Adam Waytz , Joy Heafner , Nicholas Epley (2014). The mind in the machine- Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 52 (2014) 113–117.
2.Aggarwal, P. and McGill, A.L. When brands seem human, do humans act like brands? Automatic behavioral priming effects of brand anthropomorphism. Journal of consumer research, 39, 2 (2011), 307–323.
3.Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of consumer research, 34(4), 468-479.
4.Ben Sheehan, Hyun Seung Jin, Udo Gottlieb(2020). Customer service chatbots: Anthropomorphism and adoption. Journal of Business Research 115 (2020) 14–24
5.Blanca Hernández-Ortega(2018). Don’t believe strangers: Online consumer reviews and the role of social psychological distance. Information & Management 55 (2018) 31–50
6.Bray, J. P., 2008. Consumer Behaviour Theory: Approaches and Models. Discussion Paper. Unpublished. (Unpublished)
7.Carol F. Surprenant, Michael R. Solomon(1987). Predictability and Personalization in the Service Encounter. Journal of Marketing. First Published April 1, 1987
8.Christoph Bartneck · Dana Kulic ́ · Elizabeth Croft · Susana Zoghbi(2009) Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots. International Journal of Social Robot (2009) 1: 71–81
9.Cyrus Shahabi, Farnoush Banaei-Kashani (2003). Efficient and Anonymous Web-Usage Mining for Web Personalization. Informs Journal on Computing 15(2):123-147
10.DiSalvo, C., & Gemperle, F. (2003, June). From seduction to fulfillment: the use of anthropomorphic form in design. In Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces (pp. 67-72).
11.Duffy, Brian R. "Anthropomorphism and the social robot." Robotics and autonomous systems 42.3-4 (2003): 177-190.
12.Feiyang Wang, Frédéric Basso(2019). “Animals are friends, not food”: Anthropomorphism leads to less favorable attitudes toward meat consumption by inducing feelings of anticipatory guilt. Appetite 138 (2019) 153–173
13.Gianluigi Guido, Alessandro M. Peluso (2014). Brand anthropomorphism: Conceptualization, measurement, and impact on brand personality and loyalty. Journal of Brand Management Vol. 22, 1, 1–19
14.Izak Benbasat, Angelika Dimoka, Paul A. Pavlou, Lingyun Qiu(2020).The role of demographic similarity in people`s decision to interact with online anthropomorphic recommendation agents: Evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 133 (2020) 56–70
15.Jaehoon Lee and L. J. Shrum. (2012). Conspicuous Consumption versus Charitable Behavior in Response to Social Exclusion: A Differential Needs Explanation. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 39, No. 3 (October 2012), pp. 530-544
16.Kar Yan Tam, Shuk Ying Ho. “Understanding the Impact of Web Personalization on User Information Processing and Decision Outcomes”,MIS Quarterly , Dec., 2006, Vol. 30, No. 4 (Dec., 2006), pp. 865-890
17.Kim, S., & McGill, A. L. (2011). Gaming with Mr. Slot or gaming the slot machine? Power, anthropomorphism, and risk perception. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 94-107.
18.Kwak, H., Puzakova, M., & Rocereto, J. F. (2015). Better not smile at the price: The differential role of brand anthropomorphization on perceived price fairness. Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 56-76.
19.L Eroglu, B Caglayan(1997). ANXIOLYTIC AND ANTIDEPRESSANT PROPERTIES OF METHYLENE BLUE IN ANIMAL MODELS.
20.Laksmidewi, D., Susianto, H., and Afiff, A.Z. (2017). Anthropomorphism in advertising: The effect of anthropomorphic product demonstration on consumer purchase intention. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 22(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2017.22.1.1
21.Landwehr, J. R., McGill, A. L., & Herrmann, A. (2011). It`s got the look: The effect of friendly and aggressive “facial” expressions on product liking and sales. Journal of marketing, 75(3), 132-146.
22.Li Gong(2008). How social is social responses to computers? The function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations. Computers in Human Behavior 24 (2008) 1494–1509
23.Lingyun Qiu & Izak Benbasat (2009) Evaluating Anthropomorphic Product Recommendation Agents: A Social Relationship Perspective to Designing Information Systems, Journal of Management Information Systems, 25:4, 145-182, DOI: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222250405
24.Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of experimental social psychology, 44(5), 1256-1269.
25.Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., and Liberman, N. Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of experimental social psychology, 44, 5 (2008), 1256–1269.
26.Martin Holzwarth, Chris Janiszewski, & Marcus M. Neumann(2006). The Influence of Avatars on Online Consumer Shopping Behavior. Journal of Marketing, October 2006
27.Min Chung Han (2021). The Impact of Anthropomorphism on Consumers’ Purchase Decision in Chatbot Commerce, Journal of Internet Commerce, 20:1, 46-65, DOI: 10.1080/15332861.2020.1863022
28.Nass, C., Moon, Y., and Green, N. Are machines gender neutral? Gender-stereotypic responses to computers with voices. Journal of applied social psychology, 27, 10 (1997), 864–876.
29.Nicholas Epley, Adam Waytz, and John T. Cacioppo (2007). On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism. Psychological Review Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association 2007, Vol. 114, No. 4, 864–886
30.Park RE.(1924). The Concept of Social Distance : As applied to the Study of Racial Relations. Journal of Applied Sociology 8(July-August), 339-334, 1924
31.Pharmacological research Volume 36, Issue 5, November 1997, Pages 381-385
32.Qiu, L. and Benbasat, I. Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents: A social relationship perspective to designing information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 4 (2009), 145–182.
33.Ray L. (Ray Louis) Benedicktus. (2008). Psychological Distance Perceptions and Trust Beliefs for Internet Only and Hybrid Retailers: Implications for Marketers. A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Marketingin partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
34.Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge university press.
35.Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(9), 677–688.
36.Shuk Ying Ho and David Bodoff (2014). The Effects of Web Personalization on User Attitude and Behavior. MIS Quarterly , Vol. 38, No. 2 (June 2014), pp. 497-520, A1-A10
37.Steven M. Edwards, Jin Kyun Lee, and Carrie La Ferle. (2009). Does Place Matter When Shopping Online? Perceptions of Similarity and Familiarity as Indicators of Psychological Distance. Journal of Interactive Advertising, Vol 10 No 1 (Fall 2009), pp. 35-50
38.TP Liang, HY Chen, E Turban (2009). Effect of personalization on the perceived usefulness of online customer services: a dual-core theory. International Conference on E-Commerce
39.Trope, Y., Liberman, N., and Wakslak, C. Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of consumer psychology, 17, 2 (2007), 83–95.
40.Wang, L.C., Baker, J., Wagner, J.A., and Wakefield, K. Can a retail web site be social? Journal of Marketing, 71, 3 (2007), 143–157.
41.Waytz, A., Heafner, J., and Epley, N. The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, (2014), 113–117.
42.Waytz, A., Morewedge, C.K., Epley, N., Monteleone, G., Gao, J.-H., and Cacioppo, J.T. Making sense by making sentient: effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism. Journal of personality and social psychology, 99, 3 (2010), 410.
43.Waytz, Adam, Joy Heafner, and Nicholas Epley. "The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 52 (2014): 113-117.
44.Wen Wan, E., Peng Chen, R., & Jin, L. (2017). Judging a book by its cover? The effect of anthropomorphism on product attribute processing and consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 1008-1030.
45.Wenhuan Wang (2017). Smartphones as Social Actors? Social dispositional factors in assessing anthropomorphism. Computers in Human Behavior 68 (2017) 334 - 344
46.William B. Dodds, Kent B. Monroe and Dhruv Grewal (1991). Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers` Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research , Aug., 1991, Vol. 28, No. 3 (Aug., 1991), pp. 307- 319
47.Xinge Li, Yongjun Sung(2021). Anthropomorphism brings us closer : The mediating role of psychological distance in User–AI assistant interactions. Computers in Human Behavior 118 (2021) 106680
48.Yili Hong , Paul A. Pavlou, Nan Shi, Kanliang Wang. “ON THE ROLE OF FAIRNESS AND SOCIAL DISTANCE IN DESIGNING EFFECTIVE SOCIAL REFERRAL SYSTEMS”, MIS Quarterly Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 787-809/September 2017
49.Youjeong Kim , S. Shyam Sundar (2012). Anthropomorphism of computers: Is it mindful or mindless? Computers in Human Behavior 28 (2012) 241–250.
50.Yuan, L. and Dennis, A.R. Acting Like Humans? Anthropomorphism and Consumer’s Willingness to Pay in Electronic Commerce. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 2 (2019), 450–477.
51.Yunkyung Kim a,n, Bilge Mutlu (2014)How social distance shapes human–robot interaction. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 72 (2014) 783–795
52.Yu-Wen Li (2009). Personalization as a Strategy to Build Customer Relationship: The Role of Intimacy. PACIS 2009 Doctoral Consortium Nomination Information Form
53.Zhang, T., Zhu, B., Lee, L., and Kaber, D., 2008. Service Robot Anthropomorphism and Interface Design for Emotion in Human-robot Interaction, IEEE International Conference in Automation Science and Engineering, 674-679.
54.Zhao, M. and Xie, J., “Effects of Social and Temporal Distance on Consumers` Responses to Peer Recommendations,” Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XLVIII (June 2011), 486–496.
zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202101356en_US