學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 影片標註聽力學習系統輔以遊戲化激勵機制增進學習者聽力學習認知策略
A Video Annotation Listening Learning System with a Gamified Incentive Mechanism to Improve Learners’ Metacognitive Strategies in Listening Learning作者 林宛儀
Lin, Wan-Yi貢獻者 陳志銘
Chen, Chih-Ming
林宛儀
Lin, Wan-Yi關鍵詞 以英語為第二外語、電腦輔助語言學習、遊戲化
電腦輔助語言學習
遊戲化
遊戲化學習
影片字彙標註機制
英語語言學習
英文聽力字彙
英文聽力理解
學習行為
English as a second language
Computer-assisted language learning
Gamification
Gamified learning
English language learning
English listening vocabulary
English listening comprehension
Learning behavior日期 2022 上傳時間 1-三月-2022 17:08:02 (UTC+8) 摘要 隨著全球化的發展，英語已是全世界最廣泛被使用的語言。台灣學生雖然從小學開始學習英語，但長期忽略英語聽力技巧的培養，導致難以將所學英語應用在日常生活之中。目前，以英語為第二語言的電腦輔助英語學習的研究仍然不多。因此，本研究在「不具遊戲激勵機制之影片標註聽力學習系統」上，進一步加入遊戲機制，建置「具遊戲激勵機制之影片標註聽力學習系統」，輔助英語為第二外語學習者，希望透過基於排行榜之遊戲激勵機制輔以進行英文聽力學習，激勵以英文為第二外語學習者的聽力學習策略運用，進而提升其英文聽力學習成效。同時，探究「高低不同模糊容忍度」及「高低不同學習保留成效」學習者使用「具遊戲激勵機制之影片標註聽力學習系統」，在輔以聽力學習的學習行為差異。 本研究採用真實驗研究法，募集以英語為第二外語之在台灣就讀大專院校大學生，共20 名為研究對象，將其中的10名隨機分派為使用「具影片字彙標註機制之遊戲式英語學習系統」的實驗組，以及剩餘10名隨機分派為使用「不具遊戲激勵機制之影片標註聽力學習系統」的控制組，並進行為期三週的實驗，其中兩組學習者所使用的影片教材與學習時間皆相同，以比較兩組學習者在英文聽力學習成效、英文聽力學習保留、學習滿意度，以及學習行為上的差異，並根據訪談資料提出相關教學實施與系統改善建議，以及未來研究方向。 結果發現，相較於採用「不具遊戲激勵機制之影片標註聽力學習系統」，採用「具遊戲激勵機制之影片標註聽力學習系統」具有顯著較高的英文聽力字彙與聽力理解學習保留。此外，根據行為分析顯示，採用「具遊戲激勵機制之影片標註聽力學習系統」輔以英語學習，可以促進低模糊容忍度學習者更善用由下而上及由上而下兩種不同的聽力策略進行有效的學習。換句話說，本研究證明「具遊戲激勵機制之影片標註聽力學習系統」能有效提升學習者之聽力字彙與聽力理解的學習保留成效，且可以促進低模糊容忍度學習者更善用系統輔助功能，提升認知策略的運用。
With the development of globalization, English has become the most widely spoken language in the world. Although students in Taiwan have been learning English since elementary school, their development of English listening skills has been neglected for a long time, making it difficult to apply their English in everyday life. Currently, here are still few studies on computer-assisted English learning with English as a second language. Therefore, this study adds a game mechanism to the "Video Annotated Listening Learning System (VALLS)" and builds a "Video Annotated Listening Learning System with a Gamified Incentive Mechanism (VALLS-GIM)" to assist English as a Second Language (ESL) learners. It is hoped that through the game mechanism based on a leaderboard, ESL learners would be motivated to use appropriate listening learning strategies so that their English listening learning effectiveness could be enhanced. This study also investigated the differences in learning behaviors between learners with "high and low ambiguity tolerance" and "high and low learning retention" when using the VALLS-GIM to assist their listening learning.This research adopted a true-experimental design. A total of 20 college students who were ESL learners studying in Taiwan were recruited as research participants. Ten of the students were randomly assigned to the experimental group using the VALLS-GIM and the other 10 students were randomly assigned to the control group using VALLS for a three-week experiment. The two groups of learners used the same video learning materials and spent the same learning time to compare the differences in English listening learning effectiveness, English listening learning retention, learning satisfaction, and learning behaviors between the two groups. Also, based on their interview data, suggestions for teaching implementation and system improvement, as well as future research directions were proposed.The results found that learners who used VALLS-GIM had significantly higher learning retention of English listening vocabulary and listening comprehension than those who used the VALLS. In addition, the behavioral analysis showed that the use of the VALLS-GIM could facilitate low ambiguity tolerance learners to better adopt bottom-up and top-down strategies for effective learning. This study proved that the VALLS-GIM could effectively enhance ESL learners’ learning retention of English listening vocabulary and listening comprehension as well as promote low ambiguity tolerance learners to make better use of the help options and improve their application of cognitive strategies.參考文獻 蘇怡甄（2019）。影片標註聽力複習系統輔助英語聽力訓練成效之有效行為模式研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所，臺北市。AbuSeileek, A. F. (2007). Cooperative vs. Individual Learning of Oral Skills in a CALL Environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5), 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220701746054Baldauf, M., Brandner, A., & Wimmer, C. (2017). Mobile and gamified blended learning for language teaching: Studying requirements and acceptance by students, parents and teachers in the wild. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia - MUM ’17, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152832.3152842Bingol, M. A., Celik, B., Yildiz, N., & Mart, C. T. (2014). Listening comprehension difficulties encountered by students in second language learning class. Journal of Educational & Instructional Studies in the World, 4(4).Bloomfield, A., Wayland, S. C., Rhoades, E., Blodgett, A., Linck, J., & Ross, S. (2010). What makes listening difficult? Factors affecting second language listening comprehension. Retrieved from MARYLAND UNIV COLLEGE PARK website: https://apps.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA550176Chen, C. M., Li, M. C., & Lin, M. F. (2020). The effects of video-annotated learning and reviewing system with vocabulary learning mechanism on English listening comprehension and technology acceptance, Computer Assisted Language Learning, DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2020.1825093Chai, J., & Erlam, R. (2008). The Effect and the Influence of the use of video and captions on second language learning. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 25.Chapelle, C. A. (2009). The Relationship Between Second Language Acquisition Theory and Computer-Assisted Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93(s1), 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00970.xChapelle, C., & Roberts, C. (1986). Ambiguity Tolerance and Field Independence as Predictors of Proficiency in English as a Second Language. Language Learning, 36(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1986.tb00367.xChen, L., Zhang, R., & Liu, C. (2014). Listening strategy use and influential factors in Web-based computer assisted language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12041Chun, D. M. (2016). The Role of Technology in SLA Research. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 98–115.Chung, J.-M. (1996). The effects of using advance organizers and captions to introduce video in the foreign language classroom. TESL Canada Journal, 61–65. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v14i1.678Dehghanzadeh, H., Fardanesh, H., Hatami, J., Talaee, E., & Noroozi, O. (2019). Using gamification to support learning English as a second language: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1648298Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. E. (n.d.). Gamification: Toward a Definition. 4.Ding, L., Er, E., & Orey, M. (2018). An exploratory study of student engagement in gamified online discussions. Computers & Education, 120(1), 213–226.Dunkel, P. (1991). Listening in the native and second/foreign language: Toward an integration of research and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 431–457. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586979Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1990). Adult Language Learning Styles and Strategies in an Intensive Training Setting. The Modern Language Journal, 74(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1990.tb01069.xEhrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). Cognition Plus: Correlates Of Language Learning Success. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05417.xEl-Koumy, A. S. (2003). Differences in FL Reading Comprehension Among High-, Middle-, and Low-Ambiguity Tolerance Students (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2365143). Retrieved from Social Science Research Network website: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2365143Ely, C. M. (1989). Tolerance of Ambiguity and Use of Second Language Strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 22(5), 437–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1989.tb02766.xEly, C. M. (1995). Tolerance of Ambiguity and the Teaching of ESL. In J. M. Reid (Ed.), Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom (pp. 87–95). New York: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (1996). Lecturer perceptions, problems and strategies in second language lectures. RELC Journal, 23–46.Furnham, A., & Marks, J. (2013). Tolerance of Ambiguity: A Review of the Recent Literature. Psychology, 04(09), 717–728. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.49102Gilakjani, A. P., & Ahmadi, M. R. (2011). A Study of Factors Affecting EFL Learners’ English Listening Comprehension and the Strategies for Improvement. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 977–988. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.5.977-988Gilakjani, A., & Sabouri, N. (2016). Learners’ listening comprehension difficulties in English language learning: A literature review. English Language Teaching, 9(6), p123. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n6p123Goh, T. N. (2002). A strategic assessment of six sigma. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 18(5), 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.491Graham, S., Macaro, E., & Vanderplank, R. (2007). A review of listening strategies: Focus on sources of knowledge and on success. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language Learner Strategies: 30 Years of Research and Practice (pp. 165–185). Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/12751/Hayati, A., & Mohmedi, F. (2011). The effect of films with and without subtitles on listening comprehension of EFL learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01004.xHiggins, J. (1995). Computers and English Language Learning. Intellect Books.Hsu, C.-K., Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, C.-K. (2014). An Automatic Caption Filtering and Partial Hiding Approach to Improving the English Listening Comprehension of EFL Students. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 270–283.Huang, Y.-M., Huang, Y.-M., Huang, S.-H., & Lin, Y.-T. (2012). A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use. Computers & Education, 58(1), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.008Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Connectionist Models of Language Processing and the Training of Listening Skills With the Aid of Multimedia Software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(5), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.16.5.413.29488Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031Kessler, G. (2010). Computer Assisted Language Learning: Critical Concepts in Linguistics. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 14–18.King, J. (2002). Using DVD feature films in the EFL classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(5), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.15.5.509.13468Kondo-Brown, K. (2006). Affective variables and Japanese L2 reading ability. 18(1), 55–71.Kveraga, K., Ghuman, A. S., & Bar, M. (2007). Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain. Brain and Cognition, 65(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2007.06.007Levy, M. (1997). Call: Context and Conceptualisation. Oxford University Press.Liu, G.-Z., Liu, Z.-H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2011). Developing multi-dimensional evaluation criteria for English learning websites with university students and professors. Computers & Education, 56(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.019McElhinney, E. (2008). Palgrave study skills: The International Student Handbook (Vol. 10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2009.01.004Mohsen, M. A. (2016a). The use of help options in multimedia listening environments to aid language learning: A review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1232–1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12305Mohsen, M. A. (2016b). The use of help options in multimedia listening environments to aid language learning: A review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1232–1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12305Mohsen, M. A., & Balakumar, M. (2011). A review of multimedia glosses and their effects on L2 vocabulary acquisition in CALL literature. ReCALL, 23(2), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401100005XMurphy, J. M. (1991). Oral Communication in TESOL: Integrating Speaking, Listening, and Pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 25(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587028Nosratinia, M. (2013). TheRole of Emotional Intelligence and Tolerance of Ambiguity in Predicting EFL Learners’ Language Learning Strategies. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 17(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-1712229O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524490O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985). LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY BEGINNING AND INTERMEDIATE ESL STUDENTS. Language Learning, 35(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01013.xOsada, N. (2004). Listening comprehension research: A brief review of the past thirty years. Dialogue, (3), 53–66.Renukadevi, D. (2014). The role of listening in language acquisition; the challenges and strategies in teaching listening. International Journal of Education and Information Studies, 4(1), 59–63.Rezaei, A., & Hashim, F. (2013). Impact of awareness raising about listening micro-skills on the listening comprehension enhancement: An exploration of the listening micro-skills in EFL classes. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 38(8), 1.Rusanganwa, J. (2013). Multimedia as a means to enhance teaching technical vocabulary to physics undergraduates in Rwanda. English for Specific Purposes, 32(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.07.002Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can Strategy Instruction Improve Listening Comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01246.xVandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: Acquiring successful strategies. ELT Journal, 53(3), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/53.3.168Vandergrift, L., & Baker, S. (2015). Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning, 65(2), 390–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12105Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T. (2010). The Effects of Captioning Videos Used for Foreign Language Listening Activities. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 65–86.Yang, L.-T. (2005). A study of the effect in listening comprehension after watching the cartoon of two various subtitle formats. National Taipei University of Education, Taipei.Yeldham, M. (2017). Techniques for researching L2 listeners. System, 66, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.03.001Yeldham, M., & Gruba, P. (2014). Toward an instructional approach to developing interactive second language listening. Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813505395 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
107155001資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107155001 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 陳志銘 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Chih-Ming en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 林宛儀 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Lin, Wan-Yi en_US dc.creator (作者) 林宛儀 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Lin, Wan-Yi en_US dc.date (日期) 2022 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-三月-2022 17:08:02 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-三月-2022 17:08:02 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-三月-2022 17:08:02 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0107155001 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139199 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 圖書資訊與檔案學研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 107155001 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 隨著全球化的發展，英語已是全世界最廣泛被使用的語言。台灣學生雖然從小學開始學習英語，但長期忽略英語聽力技巧的培養，導致難以將所學英語應用在日常生活之中。目前，以英語為第二語言的電腦輔助英語學習的研究仍然不多。因此，本研究在「不具遊戲激勵機制之影片標註聽力學習系統」上，進一步加入遊戲機制，建置「具遊戲激勵機制之影片標註聽力學習系統」，輔助英語為第二外語學習者，希望透過基於排行榜之遊戲激勵機制輔以進行英文聽力學習，激勵以英文為第二外語學習者的聽力學習策略運用，進而提升其英文聽力學習成效。同時，探究「高低不同模糊容忍度」及「高低不同學習保留成效」學習者使用「具遊戲激勵機制之影片標註聽力學習系統」，在輔以聽力學習的學習行為差異。 本研究採用真實驗研究法，募集以英語為第二外語之在台灣就讀大專院校大學生，共20 名為研究對象，將其中的10名隨機分派為使用「具影片字彙標註機制之遊戲式英語學習系統」的實驗組，以及剩餘10名隨機分派為使用「不具遊戲激勵機制之影片標註聽力學習系統」的控制組，並進行為期三週的實驗，其中兩組學習者所使用的影片教材與學習時間皆相同，以比較兩組學習者在英文聽力學習成效、英文聽力學習保留、學習滿意度，以及學習行為上的差異，並根據訪談資料提出相關教學實施與系統改善建議，以及未來研究方向。 結果發現，相較於採用「不具遊戲激勵機制之影片標註聽力學習系統」，採用「具遊戲激勵機制之影片標註聽力學習系統」具有顯著較高的英文聽力字彙與聽力理解學習保留。此外，根據行為分析顯示，採用「具遊戲激勵機制之影片標註聽力學習系統」輔以英語學習，可以促進低模糊容忍度學習者更善用由下而上及由上而下兩種不同的聽力策略進行有效的學習。換句話說，本研究證明「具遊戲激勵機制之影片標註聽力學習系統」能有效提升學習者之聽力字彙與聽力理解的學習保留成效，且可以促進低模糊容忍度學習者更善用系統輔助功能，提升認知策略的運用。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) With the development of globalization, English has become the most widely spoken language in the world. Although students in Taiwan have been learning English since elementary school, their development of English listening skills has been neglected for a long time, making it difficult to apply their English in everyday life. Currently, here are still few studies on computer-assisted English learning with English as a second language. Therefore, this study adds a game mechanism to the "Video Annotated Listening Learning System (VALLS)" and builds a "Video Annotated Listening Learning System with a Gamified Incentive Mechanism (VALLS-GIM)" to assist English as a Second Language (ESL) learners. It is hoped that through the game mechanism based on a leaderboard, ESL learners would be motivated to use appropriate listening learning strategies so that their English listening learning effectiveness could be enhanced. This study also investigated the differences in learning behaviors between learners with "high and low ambiguity tolerance" and "high and low learning retention" when using the VALLS-GIM to assist their listening learning.This research adopted a true-experimental design. A total of 20 college students who were ESL learners studying in Taiwan were recruited as research participants. Ten of the students were randomly assigned to the experimental group using the VALLS-GIM and the other 10 students were randomly assigned to the control group using VALLS for a three-week experiment. The two groups of learners used the same video learning materials and spent the same learning time to compare the differences in English listening learning effectiveness, English listening learning retention, learning satisfaction, and learning behaviors between the two groups. Also, based on their interview data, suggestions for teaching implementation and system improvement, as well as future research directions were proposed.The results found that learners who used VALLS-GIM had significantly higher learning retention of English listening vocabulary and listening comprehension than those who used the VALLS. In addition, the behavioral analysis showed that the use of the VALLS-GIM could facilitate low ambiguity tolerance learners to better adopt bottom-up and top-down strategies for effective learning. This study proved that the VALLS-GIM could effectively enhance ESL learners’ learning retention of English listening vocabulary and listening comprehension as well as promote low ambiguity tolerance learners to make better use of the help options and improve their application of cognitive strategies. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景與動機 1第二節 研究目的 1第三節 研究問題 2第四節 研究範圍與限制 3第五節 重要名詞解釋 4第二章 文獻探討 6第一節 英語聽力學習與英語聽力策略之運用 6第二節 電腦輔助聽力學習之相關研究 8第三節 遊戲化激勵機制促進英語學習之相關研究 10第四節 模糊容忍度影響英語聽力學習策略 10第三章 系統設計 13第一節 系統設計理念 13第二節 系統架構與機制設計 15第三節「具遊戲激勵機制之影片標註聽力學習系統」使用者介面介紹 23第四節 系統開發環境 28第四章 研究方法 30第一節 研究架構 30第二節 研究方法 33第三節 研究對象 34第四節 實驗設計 34第五節 研究工具 38第六節 資料處理與分析 40第七節 研究實施步驟 43第五章實驗結果分析 45第一節 整體學習者之學習成效與學習保留差異分析 46第二節 高低不同模糊容忍度兩組學習者之學習成效與學習保留差異分析 49第三節 整體學習者與高低不同模糊容忍度學習者之學習滿意度差異分析 57第四節 實驗組高低不同學習保留成效與高低不同模糊容忍度學習者之行為模式差異分析 60第五節 訪談質性資料分析 82第六節 綜合討論 89第六章 結論與建議 99第一節 結論 99第二節 教學實施與系統改善建議 103第三節 未來研究方向 105參考文獻 107【附錄一】英語聽力前後與保留測驗 113【附錄二】第二語言模糊容忍度量表 125【附錄三】(控制組)學習滿意度問卷 127【附錄四】(實驗組)學習滿意度問卷 128【附錄四】訪談大綱 130 zh_TW dc.format.extent 4167139 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107155001 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 以英語為第二外語、電腦輔助語言學習、遊戲化 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 電腦輔助語言學習 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 遊戲化 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 遊戲化學習 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 影片字彙標註機制 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 英語語言學習 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 英文聽力字彙 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 英文聽力理解 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學習行為 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) English as a second language en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Computer-assisted language learning en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Gamification en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Gamified learning en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) English language learning en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) English listening vocabulary en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) English listening comprehension en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Learning behavior en_US dc.title (題名) 影片標註聽力學習系統輔以遊戲化激勵機制增進學習者聽力學習認知策略 zh_TW dc.title (題名) A Video Annotation Listening Learning System with a Gamified Incentive Mechanism to Improve Learners’ Metacognitive Strategies in Listening Learning en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蘇怡甄（2019）。影片標註聽力複習系統輔助英語聽力訓練成效之有效行為模式研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所，臺北市。AbuSeileek, A. F. (2007). Cooperative vs. Individual Learning of Oral Skills in a CALL Environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5), 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220701746054Baldauf, M., Brandner, A., & Wimmer, C. (2017). Mobile and gamified blended learning for language teaching: Studying requirements and acceptance by students, parents and teachers in the wild. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia - MUM ’17, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152832.3152842Bingol, M. A., Celik, B., Yildiz, N., & Mart, C. T. (2014). Listening comprehension difficulties encountered by students in second language learning class. Journal of Educational & Instructional Studies in the World, 4(4).Bloomfield, A., Wayland, S. C., Rhoades, E., Blodgett, A., Linck, J., & Ross, S. (2010). What makes listening difficult? Factors affecting second language listening comprehension. Retrieved from MARYLAND UNIV COLLEGE PARK website: https://apps.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA550176Chen, C. M., Li, M. C., & Lin, M. F. (2020). The effects of video-annotated learning and reviewing system with vocabulary learning mechanism on English listening comprehension and technology acceptance, Computer Assisted Language Learning, DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2020.1825093Chai, J., & Erlam, R. (2008). The Effect and the Influence of the use of video and captions on second language learning. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 25.Chapelle, C. A. (2009). The Relationship Between Second Language Acquisition Theory and Computer-Assisted Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93(s1), 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00970.xChapelle, C., & Roberts, C. (1986). Ambiguity Tolerance and Field Independence as Predictors of Proficiency in English as a Second Language. Language Learning, 36(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1986.tb00367.xChen, L., Zhang, R., & Liu, C. (2014). Listening strategy use and influential factors in Web-based computer assisted language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12041Chun, D. M. (2016). The Role of Technology in SLA Research. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 98–115.Chung, J.-M. (1996). The effects of using advance organizers and captions to introduce video in the foreign language classroom. TESL Canada Journal, 61–65. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v14i1.678Dehghanzadeh, H., Fardanesh, H., Hatami, J., Talaee, E., & Noroozi, O. (2019). Using gamification to support learning English as a second language: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1648298Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. E. (n.d.). Gamification: Toward a Definition. 4.Ding, L., Er, E., & Orey, M. (2018). An exploratory study of student engagement in gamified online discussions. Computers & Education, 120(1), 213–226.Dunkel, P. (1991). Listening in the native and second/foreign language: Toward an integration of research and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 431–457. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586979Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1990). Adult Language Learning Styles and Strategies in an Intensive Training Setting. The Modern Language Journal, 74(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1990.tb01069.xEhrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). Cognition Plus: Correlates Of Language Learning Success. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05417.xEl-Koumy, A. S. (2003). Differences in FL Reading Comprehension Among High-, Middle-, and Low-Ambiguity Tolerance Students (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2365143). Retrieved from Social Science Research Network website: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2365143Ely, C. M. (1989). Tolerance of Ambiguity and Use of Second Language Strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 22(5), 437–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1989.tb02766.xEly, C. M. (1995). Tolerance of Ambiguity and the Teaching of ESL. In J. M. Reid (Ed.), Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom (pp. 87–95). New York: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (1996). Lecturer perceptions, problems and strategies in second language lectures. RELC Journal, 23–46.Furnham, A., & Marks, J. (2013). Tolerance of Ambiguity: A Review of the Recent Literature. Psychology, 04(09), 717–728. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.49102Gilakjani, A. P., & Ahmadi, M. R. (2011). A Study of Factors Affecting EFL Learners’ English Listening Comprehension and the Strategies for Improvement. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 977–988. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.5.977-988Gilakjani, A., & Sabouri, N. (2016). Learners’ listening comprehension difficulties in English language learning: A literature review. English Language Teaching, 9(6), p123. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n6p123Goh, T. N. (2002). A strategic assessment of six sigma. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 18(5), 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.491Graham, S., Macaro, E., & Vanderplank, R. (2007). A review of listening strategies: Focus on sources of knowledge and on success. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language Learner Strategies: 30 Years of Research and Practice (pp. 165–185). Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/12751/Hayati, A., & Mohmedi, F. (2011). The effect of films with and without subtitles on listening comprehension of EFL learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01004.xHiggins, J. (1995). Computers and English Language Learning. Intellect Books.Hsu, C.-K., Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, C.-K. (2014). An Automatic Caption Filtering and Partial Hiding Approach to Improving the English Listening Comprehension of EFL Students. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 270–283.Huang, Y.-M., Huang, Y.-M., Huang, S.-H., & Lin, Y.-T. (2012). A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use. Computers & Education, 58(1), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.008Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Connectionist Models of Language Processing and the Training of Listening Skills With the Aid of Multimedia Software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(5), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.16.5.413.29488Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031Kessler, G. (2010). Computer Assisted Language Learning: Critical Concepts in Linguistics. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 14–18.King, J. (2002). Using DVD feature films in the EFL classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(5), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.15.5.509.13468Kondo-Brown, K. (2006). Affective variables and Japanese L2 reading ability. 18(1), 55–71.Kveraga, K., Ghuman, A. S., & Bar, M. (2007). Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain. Brain and Cognition, 65(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2007.06.007Levy, M. (1997). Call: Context and Conceptualisation. Oxford University Press.Liu, G.-Z., Liu, Z.-H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2011). Developing multi-dimensional evaluation criteria for English learning websites with university students and professors. Computers & Education, 56(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.019McElhinney, E. (2008). Palgrave study skills: The International Student Handbook (Vol. 10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2009.01.004Mohsen, M. A. (2016a). The use of help options in multimedia listening environments to aid language learning: A review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1232–1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12305Mohsen, M. A. (2016b). The use of help options in multimedia listening environments to aid language learning: A review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1232–1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12305Mohsen, M. A., & Balakumar, M. (2011). A review of multimedia glosses and their effects on L2 vocabulary acquisition in CALL literature. ReCALL, 23(2), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401100005XMurphy, J. M. (1991). Oral Communication in TESOL: Integrating Speaking, Listening, and Pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 25(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587028Nosratinia, M. (2013). TheRole of Emotional Intelligence and Tolerance of Ambiguity in Predicting EFL Learners’ Language Learning Strategies. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 17(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-1712229O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524490O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985). LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY BEGINNING AND INTERMEDIATE ESL STUDENTS. Language Learning, 35(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01013.xOsada, N. (2004). Listening comprehension research: A brief review of the past thirty years. Dialogue, (3), 53–66.Renukadevi, D. (2014). The role of listening in language acquisition; the challenges and strategies in teaching listening. International Journal of Education and Information Studies, 4(1), 59–63.Rezaei, A., & Hashim, F. (2013). Impact of awareness raising about listening micro-skills on the listening comprehension enhancement: An exploration of the listening micro-skills in EFL classes. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 38(8), 1.Rusanganwa, J. (2013). Multimedia as a means to enhance teaching technical vocabulary to physics undergraduates in Rwanda. English for Specific Purposes, 32(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.07.002Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can Strategy Instruction Improve Listening Comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01246.xVandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: Acquiring successful strategies. ELT Journal, 53(3), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/53.3.168Vandergrift, L., & Baker, S. (2015). Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning, 65(2), 390–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12105Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T. (2010). The Effects of Captioning Videos Used for Foreign Language Listening Activities. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 65–86.Yang, L.-T. (2005). A study of the effect in listening comprehension after watching the cartoon of two various subtitle formats. National Taipei University of Education, Taipei.Yeldham, M. (2017). Techniques for researching L2 listeners. System, 66, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.03.001Yeldham, M., & Gruba, P. (2014). Toward an instructional approach to developing interactive second language listening. Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813505395 zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202200240 en_US
