| dc.contributor | 哲學系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 謝昭銳 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | Tse, Chiu Yui Plato | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2020-04 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 28-三月-2022 14:38:43 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 28-三月-2022 14:38:43 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 28-三月-2022 14:38:43 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139439 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本研究計劃目的為藉由當代對超驗論證（尤其是其在超驗觀念論的角色）和英美哲學中心理內容下的自我知識之討論來探究費希特的超驗觀念論。本研究報告分為五部分：前言、對審查意見之回應、研究目的陳述、研究成果概述以及本研究的限制與未來的可能發展。前言首先說明本研究核心因補助期間限制而形成的重要轉向，並接著回覆各項審查意見，從而闡明在計畫執行中為何要將研究聚焦在費希特耶拿時期的知識學於當代的重要性。研究目的的部分則陳述了（審查後）計畫的首要重點與議題，以及研究發現所要處理的三個特定研究問題。而研究成果的部分簡述了從研究結果而來的主要發現。摘要如下：一、在建立意識統一性的基礎上，費希特的論述一貫地聚焦在必然運作的人類理性超驗活動，而這也是為何其範疇演繹同時也是對心靈超驗結構的解釋；二、費希特的超驗觀念論提供了對於會在超驗論證的分析式後施特勞森主義的理解中見到的標準概念的一個替代方案；三、費希特的超驗觀念論提供了一條智性自我歸屬的力量與先天自我知識的層級之間關係奠基的徑路（或至少是一種理解方式），但其也必須將某些外在論者的限制納入考量。最後，報告將總結本研究所遭遇的困難和未來進一步發展的可能性。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The aim of this research project is to investigate Fichte`s transcendental idealism in light of contemporary discussions of transcendental argument (especially the role of transcendental idealism in it) and self-knowledge in terms of mental content in Anglo-American philosophy. This research report consists in a preface, responses to reviewer`s comments, a statement of the aim of research, a section summarizing the research results, and a section that discusses the difficulties and further research potentials. The preface states the reason for an important shift in the research focus as a result of the limit of the grant period. Following the preface is a section of responses that contains a summary of the reviewers` comments and my respective replies. This helps to illustrate why in its implementation the project focused on the contemporary significance of Fichte`s Jena Wissenschaftslehre. The section on the aim of research states the primary focus and issue that motivates the project (post-review) and elaborates three particular research questions that are addressed by the findings. The section on results provides a summary of the major research findings drawn from the research outcomes. To put it briefly, the results are: 1. In grounding the unity of consciousness, Fichte`s account has a unanimous focus on the transcendental activities of human reason that proceed with necessity, and this is why his deduction of categories is at the same time an account of the transcendental structure of the mind; 2. Fichte`s transcendental idealism provides an alternative to the standard conception encountered in the analytic postStrawsonian treatment of transcendental argument; 3. Fichte`s transcendental idealism provides a route of grounding (or at least a way of conceiving) the relation between the intellect`s self-ascriptive powers and a class of a priori self-knowledge, yet it must also take into consideration certain externalist constraints. Finally, the report is concluded by a section about the difficulties encountered and potentials for future development. | |
| dc.format.extent | 2804263 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 科技部, MOST108-2410-H004-006, 10805 ~ 10904 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 費希特;超驗觀念論;知識學;英美哲學;超驗論證;心靈;內容 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Fichte;transcendental idealism;Wissenschaftslehre;AngloAmerican philosophy;transcendental argument;mind;content | |
| dc.title (題名) | 費希特後期知識學的超驗觀念論及其與當代英美哲學的關聯 | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | report | |
