學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 漢語親子對話中語言與非語言指涉行為及信息狀態的發展研究
Verbal/Non-verbal Referential Acts and Information Status in Mandarin-speaking Mother-Child Conversation: A Developmental Study作者 葉侃彧
Yeh, Kanyu貢獻者 黃瓊之
Huang, Chiung-chih
葉侃彧
Yeh, Kanyu關鍵詞 指涉行為
跨模態行為
信息狀態
漢語
親子對話
Referential acts
Cross-modal acts
Information status
Mandarin Chinese
Mother-child conversation日期 2022 上傳時間 1-八月-2022 17:03:33 (UTC+8) 摘要 指涉溝通的能力為孩童發展過程中需要習得的一項重要能力。為達到成功的指涉溝通，兒童需要能依據聽話者的觀點來選擇指涉行為，並提供相對應的信息量。過往研究顯示兒童在兩歲左右已能夠透過語言的指涉表達區分新舊信息（Allen, 2000; Guerriero et al., 2006; Huang, 2011），並會使用非語言行為來輔助語言表達（Ateş & Küntay, 2018; Goldin-Meadow & Butcher, 2003; So et al., 2010），然而，關於非語言指涉行為的研究相對少量。隨著兒童認知及溝通能力的增長，語言及非語言行為兩者跨模態共同指涉的能力如何發展，仍需要更多研究探討。本研究探討漢語兒童語言與非語言指涉行為的發展，著重於其選用指涉行為與指涉物信息狀態之間的關係，及兒童使用兩個模態共同指涉的能力。同時，並檢視母親在與不同年齡兒童互動時的語言及非語言指涉行為，以進一步了解兒童的指涉溝通與周圍環境的交互影響。研究收集了一歲、三歲、及五歲三個年齡組共12對漢語親子的自然對話語料，針對對話中第三人稱指涉物分析其信息狀態（新、舊信息）及指涉行為（語言、非語言、跨模態），並細分所選用的指涉形式。研究結果發現兒童在一歲時即能透過語言及非語言指涉行為的選用，提供相對應的信息量來區分新舊信息。在指涉新信息時，兒童較常使用跨模態的語言及非語言行為共同指涉；而指涉舊信息時，則傾向單獨使用語言行為。兒童亦能依照指涉物的信息狀態，選用不同信息量的指涉形式：使用名詞組及代名詞與非語言行為的組合指涉新信息，使用零形詞指涉已知的舊信息。發展過程中兒童的語言行為隨著年齡增長而增加，但語言及非語言行為共同指涉新信息的用法仍佔了其指涉溝通的一部分。研究結果亦顯示兒童與母親使用類似的指涉表達，但兒童較倚賴語言及非語言共同指涉，尤其在指稱新信息時差異更為明顯。本研究為少數探討漢語兒童及母親的非語言指涉行為與信息狀態的研究，亦為少數直接比較孩童與母親的指涉行為的研究之一。本研究結果指出兒童在發展過程中的語言及非語言指涉行為，不只反映了其認知及溝通能力的變化，亦反映早期親子對話的特色。研究結果能增進現有文獻對漢語兒童指涉行為的理解，特別是非語言行為在兒童溝通中扮演的角色，以及其發展過程的變化與認知語用能力的關聯。
Referring is a social-cognitive skill that children need to acquire throughout their development. To succeed in referential communication, children need to develop the ability to take other people’s perspective and provide information accordingly in order to make clear references. Earlier studies have shown that the information status of referents (i.e., new and old) is one of the pragmatic factors that influences children’s referential choices from an early stage (Allen, 2000; Hughes & Allen, 2013, 2015).Previous studies have shown that children differentiate new and old referents through verbal expressions at around age two (Allen, 2000; Guerriero et al., 2006; Huang, 2011). Children also use non-verbal devices to accompany verbal ones to co-express meaning from early on (Ateş & Küntay, 2018; Goldin-Meadow & Butcher, 2003; So et al., 2010). However, relatively less research has discussed children’s referential ability from a multimodal perspective that includes their non-verbal acts. More studies are still needed to gain a clearer picture of children’s multimodal referential ability throughout their development.The present study investigated Mandarin-speaking children’s referential communication at ages one, three, and five in relation to information status to understand their increasing sensitivity to that discourse-pragmatic factor and their developing communicative ability in the two modalities. Their mothers’ verbal and non-verbal referential acts were also examined to further understand the children’s acquisition of such usages. The data included 12 hours of natural conversations between Mandarin-speaking mother-child dyads (one hour per dyad, four hours per age group). Each of the third-person referents in the conversations was coded for (1) information status (new and old) and (2) types of referential acts (verbal, cross-modal, and non-verbal). Referential expressions in the two modalities were also categorized (nominal forms, pronominal forms and null forms for verbal acts; gestures and communicative functional acts for non-verbal acts).The results showed that the children differentiated new and old referents in both the modalities and the referential expressions they used as early as age one. They used cross-modal acts more frequently to refer to new referents and verbal acts more often to indicate old referents. As for referential expressions, the children used more informative forms, including nominal forms and pronominal forms with non-verbal devices, when they indicated new referents, while they frequently chose reduced forms such as null forms when they referred to old referents. The children’s verbal acts increased during their development; however, cross-modal acts remained an alternative way to indicate new referents in the older children’s production. Similar patterns were found in their mothers’ usages. Nevertheless, the children relied on cross-modal acts more often than their mothers did, especially when they referred to new referents.The present study is one of the few studies that have examined and directly compared the children’s and the mothers’ referential communication in the two modalities. The findings demonstrated the children’s improving referential ability across modalities to co-express referents in various contexts during their development. These findings suggest that the children’s referential choices in both modalities not only reflected their communicative and pragmatic abilities but also some characteristics of early mother-child interaction.參考文獻 Allen, S. E. M. (2000). A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics, 38(3), 483-521.Allen, S. E. M., Hughes, M. E., & Skarabela, B. (2015). The role of cognitive accessibility in children’s referential choice. In L. Serratrice & S. E. M. Allen (Eds.), The acquisition of reference (pp. 123-153). John Benjamins.Allen, S. E. M., Skarabela, B., & Hughes, M. (2008). Using corpora to examine discourse effects in syntax. In H. Behrens (Ed.), Corpora in language acquisition research: History, methods, perspectives (pp. 99-137). John Benjamins.Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. Routledge.Ariel, M. (1994). Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics, 30(1), 3-42.Ateş-Şen, A. B. (2010). The effects of discourse-pragmatic principles on young Turkish toddlers’ and their regular caregivers’ referential expressions. Unpublished MA thesis. Koç University.Ateş, B. Ş., & Küntay, A. C. (2018). Referential interactions of Turkish-learning children with their caregivers about non-absent objects: Integration of non-verbal devices and prior discourse. Journal of Child Language, 45(1), 148-173.Azar, Z., Backus, A., & Özyürek, A. (2019). General- and language-specific factors influence reference tracking in speech and gesture in discourse. Discourse Processes, 56(7), 553-574. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2018.1519368Baldwin, D. A. (1991). Infants` contribution to the achievement of joint reference. Child Development, 62(5), 875-890. doi:10.2307/1131140Baldwin, D. A. (1993). Infants` ability to consult the speaker for clues to word reference. Journal of Child Language, 20(2), 395-418. doi:10.1017/S0305000900008345Baldwin, D. A., Markman, E. M., Bill, B., Desjardins, R. N., Irwin, J. M., & Tidball, G. (1996). Infants` reliance on a social criterion for establishing word-object relations. Child Development, 67(6), 3135-3153. doi:10.2307/1131771Bates, E. (1976). Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics. American Academic Press.Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. Academic.Bekken, K. E. (1989). Is there motherese in gesture? Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Chicago, IL.Bock, J. K., & Warren, R. K. (1985). Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition, 21(1), 47-67.Brand, R. J. (2000). Learning novel nouns: Children use multiple cues. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65(3), 41-61. doi:10.1111/1540-5834.00094Butcher, C., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2000). Gesture and the transition from one- to two-word speech: when hand and mouth come together. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 235-258). Cambridge University Press.Capone, N. C. (2012). Can semantic enrichment lead to naming in a word extension task? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(4), 279-292.Capone, N. C., & McGregor, K. K. (2005). The effect of semantic representation on toddlers` word retrieval. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 48(6), 1468-1480. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/102)Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63 (4). doi:10.2307/1166214Cartmill, E. A., Demir, Ö. E., & Goldin‐Meadow, S. (2012). Studying gesture. In E. Hoff (Ed.), Research methods in child language (pp. 208-225). Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781444344035.ch14Chafe, W. (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 21-51). John Benjamins.Christie, P., Newson, E., Prevezer, W., & Chandler, S. (2009). First steps in intervention with your child with autism. Jessica Kingsley.Clancy, P. M. (1993). Preferred argument structure in Korean acquisition. In E. Clark (Ed.), The proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Child Language Research Forum (pp. 307-314). CSLI.Clancy, P. M. (1997). Discourse motivations for referential choice in Korean acquisition. In H. Sohn & J. Haig (Eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics (Vol. 6, pp. 639-657). CSLI.Clark, E. V., & Estigarribia, B. (2011). Using speech and gesture to introduce new objects to young children. Gesture, 11(1), 1-23. doi:10.1075/gest.11.1.01claClark, H. H., & Bangerter, A. (2004). Changing ideas about reference. In I. A. Noveck & D. Sperber (Eds.), Experimental pragmatics (pp. 25-49). Palgrave Macmillan.Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1987). Collaborating on contributions to conversations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2(1), 19-41. doi:10.1080/01690968708406350Clark, H. H., Schreuder, R., & Buttrick, S. (1983). Common ground at the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(2), 245-258. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90189-5Debreslioska, S., & Gullberg, M. (2019). Discourse reference is bimodal: How information status in speech interacts with presence and viewpoint of gestures. Discourse Processes, 56(1), 41-60. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2017.1351909Debreslioska, S., Özyürek, A., Gullberg, M., & Perniss, P. (2013). Gestural viewpoint signals referent accessibility. Discourse Processes, 50(7), 431-456. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.824286Demir, Ö. E., So, W.-C., Özyürek, A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2012). Turkish- and English-speaking children display sensitivity to perceptual context in the referring expressions they produce in speech and gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(6), 844-867. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.589273Du Bois, J. W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63(4), 805-855.Fasolo, M., & D’Odorico, L. (2012). Gesture-plus-word combinations, transitional forms, and language development. Gesture, 12(1), 1-15. doi:10.1075/gest.12.1.01fasELAN (Version 6.1) [Computer software]. (2021). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Retrieved from https://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elanGivón, T. (Ed.) (1983). Topic continuity in discourse. John Benjamins.Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Harvard University Press.Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007). Pointing sets the stage for learning language - and creating language. Child Development, 78(3), 741-745. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01029.xGoldin-Meadow, S. (2009). From gesture to word. In E. L. Bavin (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (pp. 145-160). Cambridge University Press.Goldin-Meadow, S., & Butcher, C. (2003). Pointing toward two-word speech in young children. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. (pp. 85-107). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Goldin-Meadow, S., & Mylander, C. (1984). Gestural communication in deaf children: The effects and noneffects of parental input on early language development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 49(3/4), 1-151. doi:10.2307/1165838Goldin-Meadow, S., & Saltzman, J. (2000). The cultural bounds of maternal accommodation: How Chinese and American mothers communicate with deaf and hearing children. Psychological Science, 11(4), 307-314. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00261Graf, E., & Davies, C. (2014). The production and comprehension of referring expressions. In D. Matthews (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp. 161-181). John Benjamins.Grassmann, S. (2014). The pragmatics of word learning. In D. Matthews (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp. 139-160). John Benjamins.Grassmann, S., Magister, C., & Tomasello, M. (2011). What children do when pointing and naming conflict. Paper presented at the SRCD Biennial Meeting, Montreal, Canada.Grassmann, S., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Young children follow pointing over words in interpreting acts of reference. Developmental Science, 13(1), 252-263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00871.xGreenfield, P. M., & Smith, J. H. (1976). The structure of communication in early language development. Academic Press.Grinstead, J. (2004). Subjects and interface delay in child Spanish and Catalan. Language, 80(1), 40-72. doi:10.1353/lan.2004.0024Guerriero, S., Oshima-Takane, Y., & Kuriyama, Y. (2006). The development of referential choice in English and Japanese: A discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Child Language, 33(4), 823-857.Guidetti, M. (2002). The emergence of pragmatics: Forms and functions of conventional gestures in young French children. First Language, 22(3), 265-285.Gullberg, M. (2006). Handling discourse: Gestures, reference tracking, and communication strategies in early L2. Language Learning, 56(1), 155-196. doi:10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00344.xGullberg, M., de Bot, K., & Volterra, V. (2010). Gestures and some key issues in the study of language development. In M. Gullberg & K. de Bot (Eds.), Gestures in language development (pp. 3-33). John Benjamins.Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2), 274-307.Gundel, J. K., Ntelitheos, D., & Kowalsky, M. (2007). Children`s use of referring expressions: Some implications for theory of mind. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 48, 1-21.Hirakawa, M. (1992). Null subjects versus null objects in an early grammar of Japanese. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, 30-45.Holler, J., & Stevens, R. (2007). The effect of common ground on how speakers use gesture and speech to represent size information. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(1), 4-27. doi:10.1177/0261927x06296428Houston-Price, C., Plunkett, K., & Duffy, H. (2006). The use of social and salience cues in early word learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95(1), 27-55. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2006.03.006Huang, C.-c. (2011). Referential choice in Mandarin child language: A discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(7), 2057-2080. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.12.007Huang, C.-c. (2012). Referential choice and informativeness in mother–child conversation: A focus on the mother. Language Sciences, 34(3), 319-338. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2011.10.003Huang, C.-c. (2022). Referent accessibility and referential choice in Mandarin mother–child conversation: The incremental effect of accessibility. Lingua, 268, 103198. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103198Hughes, M. E., & Allen, S. E. M. (2013). The effect of individual discourse-pragmatic features on referential choice in child English. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 15-30.Hughes, M. E., & Allen, S. E. M. (2015). The incremental effect of discourse-pragmatic sensitivity on referential choice in the acquisition of a first language. Lingua, 155, 43-61.Iverson, J. M., Capirci, O., Volterra, V., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Learning to talk in a gesture-rich world: Early communication in Italian vs. American children. First Language, 28(2), 164-181. doi:10.1177/0142723707087736Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science, 16(5), 367-371. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01542.xLavelli, M., Barachetti, C., & Florit, E. (2015). Gesture and speech during shared book reading with preschoolers with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Language, 42(6), 1191-1218. doi:10.1017/S0305000914000762Levy, E. T., & McNeill, D. (1992). Speech, gesture, and discourse. Discourse Processes, 15(3), 277. doi:10.1080/01638539209544813Liszkowski, U. (2008). Before L1: A differentiated perspective on infant gestures. Gesture, 8(2), 180-196.Liszkowski, U., Brown, P., Callaghan, T., Takada, A., & de Vos, C. (2012). A prelinguistic gestural universal of human communication. Cognitive Science, 36(4), 698-713. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01228.xLiszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., Henning, A., Striano, T., & Tomasello, M. (2004). Twelve-month-olds point to share attention and interest. Developmental Science, 7(3), 297-307. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00349.xLiszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., Striano, T., & Tomasello, M. (2006). 12- and 18-month-olds point to provide information for others. Journal of Cognition and Development, 7(2), 173-187. doi:10.1207/s15327647jcd0702_2Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Reference and attitude in infant pointing. Journal of Child Language, 34(1), 1-20. doi:10.1017/S0305000906007689Kelly, B. F. (2011). A new look at redundancy in children’s gesture and word combinations. In I. Arono & E. V. Clark (Eds.), Experience, variation and generalization: Learning a first language (pp. 75-89). John Benjamins.MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Erlbaum.Mayberry, R. I., & Nicoladis, E. (2000). Gesture reflects language development: Evidence from bilingual children. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(6), 192-196. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00092McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press.Moll, H., & Tomasello, M. (2007). How 14- and 18-month-olds know what others have experienced. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 309-317. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.309Moore, C., Angelopoulos, M., & Bennett, P. (1999). Word learning in the context of referential and salience cues. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 60-68. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.60Moreno-Núñez, A., Rodríguez, C., & Miranda-Zapata, E. (2020). Getting away from the point: The emergence of ostensive gestures and their functions. Journal of Child Language, 47(3), 556-578. doi:10.1017/S0305000919000606Ng, M. M.-R., Demir, Ö. E., & So, W. C. (2015). The role of gesture in referential communication: A developmental perspective. In L. Serratrice & S. E. M. Allen (Eds.), The acquisition of reference (pp. 105-122). John Benjamins Publishing Company.Özçalışkan, Ş., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture is at the cutting edge of early language development. Cognition, 96(3), B101-B113.Prince, E. F. (1985). Fancy syntax and ‘shared knowledge’. Journal of Pragmatics, 9(1), 65-81.Roberts, R. J., & Patterson, C. J. (1983). Perspective taking and referential communication: The question of correspondence reconsidered. Child Development, 54(4), 1005-1014. doi:10.2307/1129904Salomo, D., & Liszkowski, U. (2013). Sociocultural settings influence the emergence of prelinguistic deictic gestures. Child Development, 84(4), 1296-1307. doi:10.1111/cdev.12026Serratrice, L. (2005). The role of discourse pragmatics in the acquisition of subjects in Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(03), 437-462. doi:10.1017/S0142716405050241Serratrice, L. (2008). The role of discourse and perceptual cues in the choice of referential expressions in English preschoolers, school-age children, and adults. Language Learning and Development, 4(4), 309-332. doi:10.1080/15475440802333619Serratrice, L. (2013). The role of number of referents and animacy in children`s use of pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 31-42. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.008Skarabela, B., & Allen, S. E. M. (2003). Joint attention in argument expression in child Inuktitut. Paper presented at the Georgetown University Roundtable in Linguistics, Washington, DC.So, W. C., Demir, Ö. E., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). When speech is ambiguous, gesture steps in: Sensitivity to discourse-pragmatic principles in early childhood. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(1), 209-224.So, W. C., Kita, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). Using the hands to identify who does what to whom: Gesture and speech go hand-in-hand. Cognitive Science, 33(1), 115-125. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01006.xSo, W. C., & Lim, J. Y. (2012). Point to a referent, and say, “what is this?” Gesture as a potential cue to identify referents in a discourse. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(2), 329-342. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000373So, W.-C., Lim, J.-Y., & Tan, S.-H. (2014). Sensitivity to information status in discourse: Gesture precedes speech in unbalanced bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(1), 71-95. doi:10.1017/S0142716412000355Stephens, G., & Matthews, D. (2014). The communicative infant from 0-18 months: The social-cognitive foundations of pragmatic development. In D. Matthews (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp. 13-36). John Benjamins Publishing Company.Thompson, L. A., & Massaro, D. W. (1986). Evaluation and integration of speech and pointing gestures during referential understanding. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42(1), 144-168. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(86)90020-2Thompson, L. A., & Massaro, D. W. (1994). Children`s integration of speech and pointing gestures in comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 327-354.Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., & Liszkowski, U. (2007). A new look at infant pointing. Child Development, 78(3), 705-722. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01025.xWang, Q., Lillo-Martin, D., Best, C. T., & Levitt, A. (1992). Null Subject versus null object: Some evidence from the acquisition of Chinese and English. Language Acquisition, 2(3), 221-254.Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A., Sloetjes, H. (2006). ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of LREC 2006, Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.Vaish, A., Demir, Ö. E., & Baldwin, D. (2011). Thirteen- and 18-month-old infants recognize when they need referential information. Social Development, 20(3), 431-449. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2010.00601.xVolden, J., Mulcahy, R. F., & Holdgrafer, G. (1997). Pragmatic language disorder and perspective taking in autistic speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18(2), 181-198. doi:10.1017/S0142716400009966 描述 博士
國立政治大學
語言學研究所
103555501資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103555501 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 黃瓊之 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Huang, Chiung-chih en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 葉侃彧 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Yeh, Kanyu en_US dc.creator (作者) 葉侃彧 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Yeh, Kanyu en_US dc.date (日期) 2022 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-八月-2022 17:03:33 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-八月-2022 17:03:33 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-八月-2022 17:03:33 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0103555501 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140967 - dc.description (描述) 博士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 語言學研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 103555501 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 指涉溝通的能力為孩童發展過程中需要習得的一項重要能力。為達到成功的指涉溝通，兒童需要能依據聽話者的觀點來選擇指涉行為，並提供相對應的信息量。過往研究顯示兒童在兩歲左右已能夠透過語言的指涉表達區分新舊信息（Allen, 2000; Guerriero et al., 2006; Huang, 2011），並會使用非語言行為來輔助語言表達（Ateş & Küntay, 2018; Goldin-Meadow & Butcher, 2003; So et al., 2010），然而，關於非語言指涉行為的研究相對少量。隨著兒童認知及溝通能力的增長，語言及非語言行為兩者跨模態共同指涉的能力如何發展，仍需要更多研究探討。本研究探討漢語兒童語言與非語言指涉行為的發展，著重於其選用指涉行為與指涉物信息狀態之間的關係，及兒童使用兩個模態共同指涉的能力。同時，並檢視母親在與不同年齡兒童互動時的語言及非語言指涉行為，以進一步了解兒童的指涉溝通與周圍環境的交互影響。研究收集了一歲、三歲、及五歲三個年齡組共12對漢語親子的自然對話語料，針對對話中第三人稱指涉物分析其信息狀態（新、舊信息）及指涉行為（語言、非語言、跨模態），並細分所選用的指涉形式。研究結果發現兒童在一歲時即能透過語言及非語言指涉行為的選用，提供相對應的信息量來區分新舊信息。在指涉新信息時，兒童較常使用跨模態的語言及非語言行為共同指涉；而指涉舊信息時，則傾向單獨使用語言行為。兒童亦能依照指涉物的信息狀態，選用不同信息量的指涉形式：使用名詞組及代名詞與非語言行為的組合指涉新信息，使用零形詞指涉已知的舊信息。發展過程中兒童的語言行為隨著年齡增長而增加，但語言及非語言行為共同指涉新信息的用法仍佔了其指涉溝通的一部分。研究結果亦顯示兒童與母親使用類似的指涉表達，但兒童較倚賴語言及非語言共同指涉，尤其在指稱新信息時差異更為明顯。本研究為少數探討漢語兒童及母親的非語言指涉行為與信息狀態的研究，亦為少數直接比較孩童與母親的指涉行為的研究之一。本研究結果指出兒童在發展過程中的語言及非語言指涉行為，不只反映了其認知及溝通能力的變化，亦反映早期親子對話的特色。研究結果能增進現有文獻對漢語兒童指涉行為的理解，特別是非語言行為在兒童溝通中扮演的角色，以及其發展過程的變化與認知語用能力的關聯。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Referring is a social-cognitive skill that children need to acquire throughout their development. To succeed in referential communication, children need to develop the ability to take other people’s perspective and provide information accordingly in order to make clear references. Earlier studies have shown that the information status of referents (i.e., new and old) is one of the pragmatic factors that influences children’s referential choices from an early stage (Allen, 2000; Hughes & Allen, 2013, 2015).Previous studies have shown that children differentiate new and old referents through verbal expressions at around age two (Allen, 2000; Guerriero et al., 2006; Huang, 2011). Children also use non-verbal devices to accompany verbal ones to co-express meaning from early on (Ateş & Küntay, 2018; Goldin-Meadow & Butcher, 2003; So et al., 2010). However, relatively less research has discussed children’s referential ability from a multimodal perspective that includes their non-verbal acts. More studies are still needed to gain a clearer picture of children’s multimodal referential ability throughout their development.The present study investigated Mandarin-speaking children’s referential communication at ages one, three, and five in relation to information status to understand their increasing sensitivity to that discourse-pragmatic factor and their developing communicative ability in the two modalities. Their mothers’ verbal and non-verbal referential acts were also examined to further understand the children’s acquisition of such usages. The data included 12 hours of natural conversations between Mandarin-speaking mother-child dyads (one hour per dyad, four hours per age group). Each of the third-person referents in the conversations was coded for (1) information status (new and old) and (2) types of referential acts (verbal, cross-modal, and non-verbal). Referential expressions in the two modalities were also categorized (nominal forms, pronominal forms and null forms for verbal acts; gestures and communicative functional acts for non-verbal acts).The results showed that the children differentiated new and old referents in both the modalities and the referential expressions they used as early as age one. They used cross-modal acts more frequently to refer to new referents and verbal acts more often to indicate old referents. As for referential expressions, the children used more informative forms, including nominal forms and pronominal forms with non-verbal devices, when they indicated new referents, while they frequently chose reduced forms such as null forms when they referred to old referents. The children’s verbal acts increased during their development; however, cross-modal acts remained an alternative way to indicate new referents in the older children’s production. Similar patterns were found in their mothers’ usages. Nevertheless, the children relied on cross-modal acts more often than their mothers did, especially when they referred to new referents.The present study is one of the few studies that have examined and directly compared the children’s and the mothers’ referential communication in the two modalities. The findings demonstrated the children’s improving referential ability across modalities to co-express referents in various contexts during their development. These findings suggest that the children’s referential choices in both modalities not only reflected their communicative and pragmatic abilities but also some characteristics of early mother-child interaction. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Acknowledgments ivChinese Abstract viEnglish Abstract viiiList of Tables xiiList of Figures xivChapter 1 Introduction 1Chapter 2 Literature Review 132.1 Referential communication 132.2 Information status and referential acts 182.2.1 Accessibility and information status 182.2.2 Information status and referential acts in children’s usage 212.2.3 Information status and referential acts in mothers’ usage 25Chapter 3 Methods 293.1 Participants and data 293.2 Coding system 303.2.1 Information status 303.2.2 Referential acts 303.3 Reliability 33Chapter 4 Results 344.1 Referential acts and information status in the children’s production 344.1.1 Referential acts of the one-year-old children 344.1.2 Referential acts of the three-year-old children 444.1.3 Referential acts of the five-year-old children 514.1.4 Developmental changes in the children’s referential communication 614.2 Referential acts and information status in the mothers’ production 694.2.1 Referential acts of the mothers of the one-year-old children 694.2.2 Referential acts of the mothers of the three-year-old children 774.2.3 Referential acts of the mothers of the five-year-old children 844.2.4 Referential acts and information status in the production of the mothers in the three age groups 904.3 Referential acts of the children and the mothers 95Chapter 5 Discussion 103Chapter 6 Conclusion 1176.1 Summary 1176.2 Limitations and suggestions for future research 119Appendix 120References 121 zh_TW dc.format.extent 880301 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103555501 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 指涉行為 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 跨模態行為 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 信息狀態 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 漢語 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 親子對話 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Referential acts en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Cross-modal acts en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Information status en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Mandarin Chinese en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Mother-child conversation en_US dc.title (題名) 漢語親子對話中語言與非語言指涉行為及信息狀態的發展研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Verbal/Non-verbal Referential Acts and Information Status in Mandarin-speaking Mother-Child Conversation: A Developmental Study en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Allen, S. E. M. (2000). A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics, 38(3), 483-521.Allen, S. E. M., Hughes, M. E., & Skarabela, B. (2015). The role of cognitive accessibility in children’s referential choice. In L. Serratrice & S. E. M. Allen (Eds.), The acquisition of reference (pp. 123-153). John Benjamins.Allen, S. E. M., Skarabela, B., & Hughes, M. (2008). Using corpora to examine discourse effects in syntax. In H. Behrens (Ed.), Corpora in language acquisition research: History, methods, perspectives (pp. 99-137). John Benjamins.Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. Routledge.Ariel, M. (1994). Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics, 30(1), 3-42.Ateş-Şen, A. B. (2010). The effects of discourse-pragmatic principles on young Turkish toddlers’ and their regular caregivers’ referential expressions. Unpublished MA thesis. Koç University.Ateş, B. Ş., & Küntay, A. C. (2018). Referential interactions of Turkish-learning children with their caregivers about non-absent objects: Integration of non-verbal devices and prior discourse. Journal of Child Language, 45(1), 148-173.Azar, Z., Backus, A., & Özyürek, A. (2019). General- and language-specific factors influence reference tracking in speech and gesture in discourse. Discourse Processes, 56(7), 553-574. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2018.1519368Baldwin, D. A. (1991). Infants` contribution to the achievement of joint reference. Child Development, 62(5), 875-890. doi:10.2307/1131140Baldwin, D. A. (1993). Infants` ability to consult the speaker for clues to word reference. Journal of Child Language, 20(2), 395-418. doi:10.1017/S0305000900008345Baldwin, D. A., Markman, E. M., Bill, B., Desjardins, R. N., Irwin, J. M., & Tidball, G. (1996). Infants` reliance on a social criterion for establishing word-object relations. Child Development, 67(6), 3135-3153. doi:10.2307/1131771Bates, E. (1976). Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics. American Academic Press.Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. Academic.Bekken, K. E. (1989). Is there motherese in gesture? Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Chicago, IL.Bock, J. K., & Warren, R. K. (1985). Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition, 21(1), 47-67.Brand, R. J. (2000). Learning novel nouns: Children use multiple cues. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65(3), 41-61. doi:10.1111/1540-5834.00094Butcher, C., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2000). Gesture and the transition from one- to two-word speech: when hand and mouth come together. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 235-258). Cambridge University Press.Capone, N. C. (2012). Can semantic enrichment lead to naming in a word extension task? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(4), 279-292.Capone, N. C., & McGregor, K. K. (2005). The effect of semantic representation on toddlers` word retrieval. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 48(6), 1468-1480. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/102)Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63 (4). doi:10.2307/1166214Cartmill, E. A., Demir, Ö. E., & Goldin‐Meadow, S. (2012). Studying gesture. In E. Hoff (Ed.), Research methods in child language (pp. 208-225). Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781444344035.ch14Chafe, W. (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 21-51). John Benjamins.Christie, P., Newson, E., Prevezer, W., & Chandler, S. (2009). First steps in intervention with your child with autism. Jessica Kingsley.Clancy, P. M. (1993). Preferred argument structure in Korean acquisition. In E. Clark (Ed.), The proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Child Language Research Forum (pp. 307-314). CSLI.Clancy, P. M. (1997). Discourse motivations for referential choice in Korean acquisition. In H. Sohn & J. Haig (Eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics (Vol. 6, pp. 639-657). CSLI.Clark, E. V., & Estigarribia, B. (2011). Using speech and gesture to introduce new objects to young children. Gesture, 11(1), 1-23. doi:10.1075/gest.11.1.01claClark, H. H., & Bangerter, A. (2004). Changing ideas about reference. In I. A. Noveck & D. Sperber (Eds.), Experimental pragmatics (pp. 25-49). Palgrave Macmillan.Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1987). Collaborating on contributions to conversations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2(1), 19-41. doi:10.1080/01690968708406350Clark, H. H., Schreuder, R., & Buttrick, S. (1983). Common ground at the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(2), 245-258. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90189-5Debreslioska, S., & Gullberg, M. (2019). Discourse reference is bimodal: How information status in speech interacts with presence and viewpoint of gestures. Discourse Processes, 56(1), 41-60. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2017.1351909Debreslioska, S., Özyürek, A., Gullberg, M., & Perniss, P. (2013). Gestural viewpoint signals referent accessibility. Discourse Processes, 50(7), 431-456. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.824286Demir, Ö. E., So, W.-C., Özyürek, A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2012). Turkish- and English-speaking children display sensitivity to perceptual context in the referring expressions they produce in speech and gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(6), 844-867. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.589273Du Bois, J. W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63(4), 805-855.Fasolo, M., & D’Odorico, L. (2012). Gesture-plus-word combinations, transitional forms, and language development. Gesture, 12(1), 1-15. doi:10.1075/gest.12.1.01fasELAN (Version 6.1) [Computer software]. (2021). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Retrieved from https://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elanGivón, T. (Ed.) (1983). Topic continuity in discourse. John Benjamins.Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Harvard University Press.Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007). Pointing sets the stage for learning language - and creating language. Child Development, 78(3), 741-745. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01029.xGoldin-Meadow, S. (2009). From gesture to word. In E. L. Bavin (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (pp. 145-160). Cambridge University Press.Goldin-Meadow, S., & Butcher, C. (2003). Pointing toward two-word speech in young children. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. (pp. 85-107). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Goldin-Meadow, S., & Mylander, C. (1984). Gestural communication in deaf children: The effects and noneffects of parental input on early language development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 49(3/4), 1-151. doi:10.2307/1165838Goldin-Meadow, S., & Saltzman, J. (2000). The cultural bounds of maternal accommodation: How Chinese and American mothers communicate with deaf and hearing children. Psychological Science, 11(4), 307-314. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00261Graf, E., & Davies, C. (2014). The production and comprehension of referring expressions. In D. Matthews (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp. 161-181). John Benjamins.Grassmann, S. (2014). The pragmatics of word learning. In D. Matthews (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp. 139-160). John Benjamins.Grassmann, S., Magister, C., & Tomasello, M. (2011). What children do when pointing and naming conflict. Paper presented at the SRCD Biennial Meeting, Montreal, Canada.Grassmann, S., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Young children follow pointing over words in interpreting acts of reference. Developmental Science, 13(1), 252-263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00871.xGreenfield, P. M., & Smith, J. H. (1976). The structure of communication in early language development. Academic Press.Grinstead, J. (2004). Subjects and interface delay in child Spanish and Catalan. Language, 80(1), 40-72. doi:10.1353/lan.2004.0024Guerriero, S., Oshima-Takane, Y., & Kuriyama, Y. (2006). The development of referential choice in English and Japanese: A discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Child Language, 33(4), 823-857.Guidetti, M. (2002). The emergence of pragmatics: Forms and functions of conventional gestures in young French children. First Language, 22(3), 265-285.Gullberg, M. (2006). Handling discourse: Gestures, reference tracking, and communication strategies in early L2. Language Learning, 56(1), 155-196. doi:10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00344.xGullberg, M., de Bot, K., & Volterra, V. (2010). Gestures and some key issues in the study of language development. In M. Gullberg & K. de Bot (Eds.), Gestures in language development (pp. 3-33). John Benjamins.Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2), 274-307.Gundel, J. K., Ntelitheos, D., & Kowalsky, M. (2007). Children`s use of referring expressions: Some implications for theory of mind. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 48, 1-21.Hirakawa, M. (1992). Null subjects versus null objects in an early grammar of Japanese. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, 30-45.Holler, J., & Stevens, R. (2007). The effect of common ground on how speakers use gesture and speech to represent size information. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(1), 4-27. doi:10.1177/0261927x06296428Houston-Price, C., Plunkett, K., & Duffy, H. (2006). The use of social and salience cues in early word learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95(1), 27-55. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2006.03.006Huang, C.-c. (2011). Referential choice in Mandarin child language: A discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(7), 2057-2080. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.12.007Huang, C.-c. (2012). Referential choice and informativeness in mother–child conversation: A focus on the mother. Language Sciences, 34(3), 319-338. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2011.10.003Huang, C.-c. (2022). Referent accessibility and referential choice in Mandarin mother–child conversation: The incremental effect of accessibility. Lingua, 268, 103198. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103198Hughes, M. E., & Allen, S. E. M. (2013). The effect of individual discourse-pragmatic features on referential choice in child English. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 15-30.Hughes, M. E., & Allen, S. E. M. (2015). The incremental effect of discourse-pragmatic sensitivity on referential choice in the acquisition of a first language. Lingua, 155, 43-61.Iverson, J. M., Capirci, O., Volterra, V., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Learning to talk in a gesture-rich world: Early communication in Italian vs. American children. First Language, 28(2), 164-181. doi:10.1177/0142723707087736Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science, 16(5), 367-371. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01542.xLavelli, M., Barachetti, C., & Florit, E. (2015). Gesture and speech during shared book reading with preschoolers with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Language, 42(6), 1191-1218. doi:10.1017/S0305000914000762Levy, E. T., & McNeill, D. (1992). Speech, gesture, and discourse. Discourse Processes, 15(3), 277. doi:10.1080/01638539209544813Liszkowski, U. (2008). Before L1: A differentiated perspective on infant gestures. Gesture, 8(2), 180-196.Liszkowski, U., Brown, P., Callaghan, T., Takada, A., & de Vos, C. (2012). A prelinguistic gestural universal of human communication. Cognitive Science, 36(4), 698-713. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01228.xLiszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., Henning, A., Striano, T., & Tomasello, M. (2004). Twelve-month-olds point to share attention and interest. Developmental Science, 7(3), 297-307. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00349.xLiszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., Striano, T., & Tomasello, M. (2006). 12- and 18-month-olds point to provide information for others. Journal of Cognition and Development, 7(2), 173-187. doi:10.1207/s15327647jcd0702_2Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Reference and attitude in infant pointing. Journal of Child Language, 34(1), 1-20. doi:10.1017/S0305000906007689Kelly, B. F. (2011). A new look at redundancy in children’s gesture and word combinations. In I. Arono & E. V. Clark (Eds.), Experience, variation and generalization: Learning a first language (pp. 75-89). John Benjamins.MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Erlbaum.Mayberry, R. I., & Nicoladis, E. (2000). Gesture reflects language development: Evidence from bilingual children. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(6), 192-196. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00092McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press.Moll, H., & Tomasello, M. (2007). How 14- and 18-month-olds know what others have experienced. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 309-317. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.309Moore, C., Angelopoulos, M., & Bennett, P. (1999). Word learning in the context of referential and salience cues. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 60-68. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.60Moreno-Núñez, A., Rodríguez, C., & Miranda-Zapata, E. (2020). Getting away from the point: The emergence of ostensive gestures and their functions. Journal of Child Language, 47(3), 556-578. doi:10.1017/S0305000919000606Ng, M. M.-R., Demir, Ö. E., & So, W. C. (2015). The role of gesture in referential communication: A developmental perspective. In L. Serratrice & S. E. M. Allen (Eds.), The acquisition of reference (pp. 105-122). John Benjamins Publishing Company.Özçalışkan, Ş., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture is at the cutting edge of early language development. Cognition, 96(3), B101-B113.Prince, E. F. (1985). Fancy syntax and ‘shared knowledge’. Journal of Pragmatics, 9(1), 65-81.Roberts, R. J., & Patterson, C. J. (1983). Perspective taking and referential communication: The question of correspondence reconsidered. Child Development, 54(4), 1005-1014. doi:10.2307/1129904Salomo, D., & Liszkowski, U. (2013). Sociocultural settings influence the emergence of prelinguistic deictic gestures. Child Development, 84(4), 1296-1307. doi:10.1111/cdev.12026Serratrice, L. (2005). The role of discourse pragmatics in the acquisition of subjects in Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(03), 437-462. doi:10.1017/S0142716405050241Serratrice, L. (2008). The role of discourse and perceptual cues in the choice of referential expressions in English preschoolers, school-age children, and adults. Language Learning and Development, 4(4), 309-332. doi:10.1080/15475440802333619Serratrice, L. (2013). The role of number of referents and animacy in children`s use of pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 31-42. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.008Skarabela, B., & Allen, S. E. M. (2003). Joint attention in argument expression in child Inuktitut. Paper presented at the Georgetown University Roundtable in Linguistics, Washington, DC.So, W. C., Demir, Ö. E., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). When speech is ambiguous, gesture steps in: Sensitivity to discourse-pragmatic principles in early childhood. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(1), 209-224.So, W. C., Kita, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). Using the hands to identify who does what to whom: Gesture and speech go hand-in-hand. Cognitive Science, 33(1), 115-125. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01006.xSo, W. C., & Lim, J. Y. (2012). Point to a referent, and say, “what is this?” Gesture as a potential cue to identify referents in a discourse. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(2), 329-342. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000373So, W.-C., Lim, J.-Y., & Tan, S.-H. (2014). Sensitivity to information status in discourse: Gesture precedes speech in unbalanced bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(1), 71-95. doi:10.1017/S0142716412000355Stephens, G., & Matthews, D. (2014). The communicative infant from 0-18 months: The social-cognitive foundations of pragmatic development. In D. Matthews (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp. 13-36). John Benjamins Publishing Company.Thompson, L. A., & Massaro, D. W. (1986). Evaluation and integration of speech and pointing gestures during referential understanding. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42(1), 144-168. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(86)90020-2Thompson, L. A., & Massaro, D. W. (1994). Children`s integration of speech and pointing gestures in comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 327-354.Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., & Liszkowski, U. (2007). A new look at infant pointing. Child Development, 78(3), 705-722. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01025.xWang, Q., Lillo-Martin, D., Best, C. T., & Levitt, A. (1992). Null Subject versus null object: Some evidence from the acquisition of Chinese and English. Language Acquisition, 2(3), 221-254.Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A., Sloetjes, H. (2006). ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of LREC 2006, Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.Vaish, A., Demir, Ö. E., & Baldwin, D. (2011). Thirteen- and 18-month-old infants recognize when they need referential information. Social Development, 20(3), 431-449. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2010.00601.xVolden, J., Mulcahy, R. F., & Holdgrafer, G. (1997). Pragmatic language disorder and perspective taking in autistic speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18(2), 181-198. doi:10.1017/S0142716400009966 zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202201079 en_US
