| dc.contributor.advisor | 孫采薇 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Sun, Tsai-Wei | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (作者) | 洋成 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (作者) | Matthana Rodyim | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 洋成 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Rodyim, Matthana | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2022 | en_US |
| dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) | G0107265503 | en_US |
| dc.description (描述) | 博士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 亞太研究英語博士學位學程(IDAS) | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 107265503 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本研究調查拉瑪九世或普密蓬國王驗屍時，泰國政治背景下的恐懼並解釋導致政治衝突的現象起因。論文中的主要問題包括，此恐懼是如何在泰國政治中產生和根深蒂固的、統治階級如何利用國家機制來操縱恐懼以確保維持其現狀，以及恐懼是如何通過統治階級網絡在泰國社會中維持的。此論文著重於製造恐懼的三個階段，即在泰國政治社會中呈現的政治恐懼的戲場國家的狀態：1）恐懼的創造，2）恐懼的轉移，3）保持對統治階級的恐懼。
因此，調查結果表明，君主制、軍方支持的政客和商人或三方網絡的君權網路的不斷協調，透過以將《君主論》或第 112 條將恐懼戲劇化來針對不同政見者，以確保現狀。由於現任國王哇集拉隆功缺乏Barami或政治魅力，它已經提醒統治階級人們注意失去現狀的可能性。君權網路必須通過政治恐懼的劇院狀態的三個階段來戲劇化恐懼。戲劇化涉及誹謗威脅執法話語第112條。本次調查結果還討論了三方之間的關係。
考慮到，它在政治恐懼的劇院狀態概念中構建了統治階級的意識形態。對於方法論裝置，批判性話語分析（CDA）能夠全面了解泰國政治中的恐懼。 CDA方法用於在國王發表關於Lèse-majesté法的信息之前以不同的方式回答政治現象。論文采訪了政治流亡者、冒犯君主的罪犯和執法人員的受害者。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This research investigates the fear in the Thai political context in the post-mortem of King Rama IX or King Bhumibol and explains the phenomena which caused the political conflict. The leading questions in the dissertation include how fear has been created and ingrained in Thai politics, how the ruling class manipulates fear by using the state mechanism to secure their status quo, and how fear has been maintained in Thai society through the ruling class network. It focuses on three stages for making fear, the theatre state of political fear, presented in Thai political society: 1) Creation of Fear, 2) Fear Transfer, and 3) Maintaining Fear from the elite.
Therefore, the finding suggests that the monarchy, military-back politicians, and businesspeople or the tripartite of network monarchy have been coordinating to secure the status quo by dramatizing fear through Lèse-majesté law or section 112 against state dissidents. Since the current King Vajiralongkorn lacks barami or political charisma, it has alerted the elite’s attention to losing its status quo. The network monarchy has to dramatize fear through three stages of theatre state of political fear. The dramatization relates to the threat of defamation law enforcement discursive of section 112. The finding also discusses the relationship between tripartite.
Considering, it frames the elite ideology in the concept of a theatre state of political fear. For the methodological device, the critical discourse analysis (CDA) enables a comprehensive understanding of the fear in Thai politics. CDA method is utilized to answer the political phenomenon differently before the King’s message on Lèse-majesté law. The dissertation conducted interviews with political exiles, the Lèse-majesté convicts, and the victim of the law enforcement officer. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgement i
Abstract iii
摘要 iv
Table of Content v
List of figures vii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1. Research questions 4
1.2. Research argument 5
1.3. Methodology 9
1.4. Methods of study 10
1.4.1 Critical Discourse Analysis 10
1.5. Unit of analysis and time frame 14
1.6. Data collection and data analysis 15
Chapter 2 Literature review 16
2.1.1 Cultural Hegemony 19
2.1.3 Theatre state of political fear 22
2.2. Fear in Thai politics 23
2.2.1 Political Fear 23
2.2.2. King-elite’s network 29
2.2.3. The elite and network 30
2.2.4. The sacralized King 34
Chapter 3 The Creation of fear 38
3.1 Early-stage dramatization plots 39
3.1.1 The dramatization plot of political fear and the King revitalization 43
3.2. Sacralized King and self-legitimization 65
3.2.1 Barami and the elites 72
3.2.2 Lèse-majesté 75
3.3. Chapter Conclusion 76
Chapter 4 Fear Transfer 79
4.1. The monarchy and state 79
4.1.1. Rumors and Delegitimization in theatre state of political fear 81
4.1.2. State’s tactic and threat of Lèse-majesté 89
4.1.3. The overlapping period from pre-2014 onwards 90
4.2. Chapter Conclusion 101
Chapter 5 Maintaining of Fear 103
5.1. Network Monarchy structure 103
5.1.1. King’s intervention and his presence 104
5.1.2 Military and police 109
5.1.3. Money talks 111
5.2. Maintaining Lèse-majesté 115
5.2.1. Monarchy’s imaginative representation 122
5.3. Chapter Conclusion 126
Chapter 6 Conclusion 128
6.1. Creation of Fear 129
6.2. Fear Transfer 130
6.3. Maintaining Fear 132
6.4. Theoretical contribution 134
Bibliography 137
Appendix 185 | zh_TW |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107265503 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 恐懼的政治 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 法律話語 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 國王 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 君權網絡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 冒犯君主法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 劇場國家 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Politics of fear | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Legal discourse | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | King | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Network Monarchy | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Lèse-majesté | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Theatre state | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 泰國政治恐懼：普密蓬國王逝世後的泰國政治之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Politics of Fear in Thailand: A Study of Thai politics after the Death of King Bhumibol | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | - |
