1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 文學院
  4. 期刊論文
  5. Item

學術產出-期刊論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 Post-Perceptual Confidence and Supervaluative Matching Profile
作者 鄭會穎
Cheng, Tony
貢獻者 哲學系
關鍵詞 perception; cognition; confidence; supervaluative matching profile
日期 2022-03
上傳時間 2-十二月-2022 15:23:25 (UTC+8)
摘要 Issues concerning the putative perception/cognition divide are not only age-old, but also resurface in contemporary discussions in various forms. In this paper, I connect a relatively new debate concerning perceptual confidence to the perception/cognition divide. The term ‘perceptual confidence’ is quite common in the empirical literature, but there is an unsettled question about it, namely: are confidence assignments perceptual or post-perceptual? John Morrison in two recent papers puts forward the claim that confidence arises already at the level of perception. In this paper, I first argue that Morrison’s case is unconvincing, and then develop one picture on perceptual precision with the notion of ‘matching profile’ (Peacocke, C. 1986. “The Inaugural Address: Analogue Content.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary 60: 1–18) and ‘supervaluation’ (Van Fraassen, B. 1966. “Singular Terms, Truth-value Gaps, and Free Logic.” The Journal of Philosophy 63 (17): 481–495.), highlighting the fact that this is a vagueness account, which is similar to but importantly different from indeterminacy accounts (e.g. Stazicker, J. 2011. “Attention, Visual Consciousness and Indeterminacy.” Mind and Language 26 (2): 156–184.). With this model in hand, there can be rich resources with which to draw a theoretical line between perception and cognition.
關聯 Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Vol.65, No.3, pp.249-277
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2018.1562370
dc.contributor 哲學系
dc.creator (作者) 鄭會穎
dc.creator (作者) Cheng, Tony
dc.date (日期) 2022-03
dc.date.accessioned 2-十二月-2022 15:23:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-十二月-2022 15:23:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-十二月-2022 15:23:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142663-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Issues concerning the putative perception/cognition divide are not only age-old, but also resurface in contemporary discussions in various forms. In this paper, I connect a relatively new debate concerning perceptual confidence to the perception/cognition divide. The term ‘perceptual confidence’ is quite common in the empirical literature, but there is an unsettled question about it, namely: are confidence assignments perceptual or post-perceptual? John Morrison in two recent papers puts forward the claim that confidence arises already at the level of perception. In this paper, I first argue that Morrison’s case is unconvincing, and then develop one picture on perceptual precision with the notion of ‘matching profile’ (Peacocke, C. 1986. “The Inaugural Address: Analogue Content.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary 60: 1–18) and ‘supervaluation’ (Van Fraassen, B. 1966. “Singular Terms, Truth-value Gaps, and Free Logic.” The Journal of Philosophy 63 (17): 481–495.), highlighting the fact that this is a vagueness account, which is similar to but importantly different from indeterminacy accounts (e.g. Stazicker, J. 2011. “Attention, Visual Consciousness and Indeterminacy.” Mind and Language 26 (2): 156–184.). With this model in hand, there can be rich resources with which to draw a theoretical line between perception and cognition.
dc.format.extent 109 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Vol.65, No.3, pp.249-277
dc.subject (關鍵詞) perception; cognition; confidence; supervaluative matching profile
dc.title (題名) Post-Perceptual Confidence and Supervaluative Matching Profile
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1080/0020174X.2018.1562370
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2018.1562370