學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 區域整合中之權力集中與制度獨立性：以南錐共同體為例
Power Concentration and Institutional Independence in Regional Integration: The Case of MERCOSUR作者 穆守仁
Bragança, Murilo貢獻者 吳崇涵
Wu, Chong-han
穆守仁
Bragança, Murilo關鍵詞 權力集中
制度獨立性
區域整合
南方共同市場
Power concentration
Institutional independence
Regional integration
MERCOSUR日期 2023 上傳時間 9-三月-2023 18:46:24 (UTC+8) 摘要 權力集中對區域制度的設計及實踐會產生什麼影響？是什麼原因以及在什麼條件下，區域強權會接受建立更獨立的區域制度？本研究認為，在區域組織中，若權力集中於一個佔優勢的國家時，此組織的設計和實踐會受到影響。本研究運用過程回溯法分析南美洲的南方共同市場（MERCOSUR），發現身為區域強權的巴西較偏好缺乏獨立性的機構。而當面臨巴西為何在2002年接受區域制度更具獨立性的難題時，本研究認為Pedersen（2002）的合作性霸權途徑可以做出解釋，具體來說，巴西接受區域制度更具獨立性的原因是為了在不利的情況下維持該組織的凝聚力。
What is the effect of power concentration in the design and implementation of regional institutions? Why, and in what conditions, regional great powers accept the establishment of more independent formats of regional institutions? This thesis argues that the concentration of power in a preponderant state within a regional organization affects the design and implementation of regional institutions. By employing process-tracing to study the Common Market of the South (MERCOSUR) in South America, it finds that Brazil as a regional great power preferred institutions that lacked independence. Faced with the puzzle on why Brazil accepted more independent institutions in 2002, it argues that Pedersen (2002)’s cooperative hegemony approach help explain these events. More specifically, that Brazil accepted more institutional independence as a side-payment to maintain the bloc`s cohesion in an adverse scenario.參考文獻 Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (1998). Why states act through formal international organiza-tions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002798042001001Abbott, K. W., Keohane R. O., Slaughter A. M., Snidal D. (2000). The Concept of Legal-ization. International Organization, 54(3), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551271Abreu, S. (2000). Uruguay: socio pequeño del Mercosur [Uruguay: Small partner of Mercosur]. In F. Mateo (Ed.), Los países pequeños: Su rol en los procesos de integración [The small countries: Their role in integration processes] (p. 41-77). Inter-American Development Bank – Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean. https://publications.iadb.org/es/publicacion/14608/los-paises-pequenos-su-rol-en-los-procesos-de-integracionAcordo bilateral com Washington não deve ser descartado, diz Cavallo [Bilateral agreement with Washington should not be discarded, says Cavallo]. (2001, May 4). O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B12.Amaral, S. M. C. (2007). A dinâmica das relações comerciais do Mercosul à luz dos instrumentos de política comercial (1998-2005) [The dynamics of trade relations in Mercosur in view of commercial policy instruments]. [Master’s thesis, University of Brasília]. Repositório Institucional da UnB. https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/2694Arai, A. L. (1997, December 15). Um não diplomática aos magistrados [A diplomatic “no” to magistrates]. Gazeta Mercantil. Hemeroteca de Política Externa Brasileira. https://hemerotecapeb.lantri.org/lantri/hemeroteca-ris-brasil-vigevani-miyamoto/brasil-america_latina/brasil-america_latina-005187.pdfArashiro, Z. (2011). Negotiating the Free Trade Area of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan.Argentinos defendem anteicpação da Alca [Argentines defend antecipation of the FTAA] (2001, February 6). O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B3.Arnold, C. (2017). Empty promises and nonincorporation in Mercosur. International In-teractions, 43(4), 643–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2016.1206391Arnold, C., & Rittberger, B. (2013). The legalization of dispute resolution in Mercosur. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 5(3), 97–132. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1866802X1300500304Avança idéia de moeda única na área do Mercosul (2001, December 22). O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B7.Aydin, A. (2010). The deterrent effects of economic integration. Journal of Peace Re-search, 47(5), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022343310370290Azoulai, L.; & Dehousse, R. (2012). The European Court of Justice and the Legal Dynamics of Integration. In E. Jones, A. Menon, & S. Weatherhill (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the European Union (pp. 350-364). Oxford University Press.Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase mem-bers’ international trade? Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005Baptista, L. O. (1996). O Mercosul após o Protocolo de Ouro Preto [Mercosur after the Protocol of Ouro Preto]. Estudos Avançados, 10(27), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40141996000200011Barral, W. (2003). O novo sistema de solução de controvérsias do Mercosul [The new dispute settlement system of Mercosur]. In A. G. de Azevedo (Ed.). Estudos em Arbitragem, Mediação e Negociação [Studies on Arbitration, Mediation and Negotiation] (pp. 49-70). Fundação Universidade de Brasília.Bastos, L. A., Dias, R., Monção, B. A., da Silva, K. J. (2016). Os reflexos das crises internacionais da década de 1990 nas economias-membro do Mercosul [The impacts of the international crisis of the decade of 1990 in the member-economies of Mercosur]. Revista NUPEM, 4(6), 164-181. https://doi.org/10.33871/nupem.v4i6.104Bearce, D. H., & Omori, S. (2005). How do commercial institutions promote peace? Jour-nal of Peace Research, 42(6), 659–678. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022343305057886Bianculli, A. C. (2016). Latin America. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (pp. 154–177). Oxford University Press.Boehmer, C., Gartzke, E., & Nordstrom, T. (2004). Do intergovernmental organizations promote peace? World Politics, 57(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2005.0008Börzel, T. A. (2016). Theorizing Regionalism: Cooperation, Integration, and Governance. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (pp. 41–63). Oxford University Press.Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2016). Introduction. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Ox-ford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (pp. 4–16). Oxford University Press.Bouzas, R. (2001). El Mercosur diez años despues. ¿Proceso de aprendizaje o déjà vu? [Mercosur after ten years. Learning process or déjà vu?] Desarollo Económico, 41(162), 180-200. https://doi.org/10.2307/3455985Bouzas, R. (2008). Regional governance institutions, asymmetries, and deeper integration in MERCOSUR. In J. S. Blyde, E. Fernández-Arias, & P. Giordano (Eds.), Deepening Integration in Mercosur: Dealing with Disparities (pp. 355–379). Inter-American Devel-opment Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/en/deepening-integration-mercosur-dealing-disparitiesBouzas, R., Gratius, S., Soltz, H., Sberro, S. (2008a). Teoría y práctica de las instituciones y procesos de decisión [Theory and practice of institutions and decision-making proces-ses]. In S. Gratius (Ed.), MERCOSUR y NAFTA: Instituciones y mecanismos de decision en procesos de integración asimétricos [MERCOSUR and NAFTA: Institutions and deci-sion-making mechanisms in asymmetrical integration processes] (pp. 33-96). Iberoameri-cana.Bouzas, R., Coronado, H., Mena, A. O., Soltz, H. (2008b). La eficacia de los mecanismos de solución de controversias [The effectiveness of the dispute settlement mechanisms]. In S. Gratius (Ed.), MERCOSUR y NAFTA: Instituciones y mecanismos de decision en procesos de integración asimétricos [MERCOSUR and NAFTA: Institutions and decision-making mechanisms in asymmetrical integration processes] (pp. 97-109). Iberoamericana.Burges, S. W. (2006). Without sticks or carrots: Brazilian leadership in South America during the Cardoso Era, 1992–2003. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 25(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0261-3050.2006.00151.xBressan, R. N. (2012). A institucionalização do Mercsul e o Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias [The institutionalization of Mercosur and the Dispute Settlement System]. Perspectivas, 42, 17-39.Briceño-Ruiz, J., & Morales, I. (2017). Introduction. In J. Briceño-Ruiz, & I. Morales (Eds.), Post-Hegemonic Regionalism in the Americas (pp. 1-15). Routledge.Caetano, G. (2011). Breve historia del MERCOSUR en sus 20 años. Coyunturas e instuciones (1991-2011) [Brief history of MERCOSUR in its 20 years. Conjunctures and institutions (1991-2011). In G. Caetano (Ed.) MERCOSUR: 20 años [MERCOSUR: 20 years] (pp. 21-74). Centro de Formación para la Integración Regional (CEFIR).Caichiolo, R. (2020). Mercosur: Limits of Regional Integration. Erasmus Law Review, 12(3), 246-268. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3681278Caminoto, J. (2001, April 20). Cavallo diz preferir acordo bilateral com so EUA [Cavallo prefers bilateral agreement with the USA]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B5.Campos, G. L. (2016). From success to failure: Under what conditions did Mercosur inte-grate? Journal of Economic Integration, 31(4), 855–897. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44028249Candeas, A. (2017). A Integração Brasil-Argentina: História de uma ideia na “visão do outro” [Brazil-Argentina Integration: History of an idea in the “perspective of the other”] (2nd ed.). Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão.Cardoso, F. H. (2001, June 22). Discurso na Reunião de Cúpula do Mercosul, por ocasião da Reunião do Conselho do Mercado Comum [Speech in the Meeting of the Mercosur Summit, by occasion of Summit of the Common Market Council]. Available at http://www.biblioteca.presidencia.gov.br/presidencia/ex-presidentes/fernando-henrique-cardoso/discursos/2o-mandato/2001/62.pdf/viewCarranza, M. (2000). South American Free Trade Area or Free Trade Area of the Americas? Open Regionalism and the Future of Regional Economic Integration in South America. Routledge.Carranza, M.E. (2017). Resilient or Declining? Mercosur and the Future of Post-Liberal Regionalism in Latin America. In J. Briceño-Ruiz, I. Morales (Eds.), Post-Hegemonic Re-gionalism in the Americas: Toward a Pacific-Atlantic Divide? (pp. 125-140). Routledge.Cason, J. (2000). On the Road to Southern Cone Economic Integration. Journal of Inter-american Studies and World Affairs, 42(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/166464Chade, J. (2001, March 23). UE pretende ter com o Mercosul um acordo mais amplo que a Alca [EU intends to have a broader agreement with Mercosur than FTAA]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B7.Chodor, T. (2021). The Changing Face of Mercosur: Legitimacy and the Politics of Scale in South American Regionalism. Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(2), 417-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13200Choi, Y. J., & Caporaso, J. A. (2002). Comparative regional integration. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse-Kappen, T. Risse, B. A. Simmons (Eds.) Handbook of International Relations (pp. 480-499). SAGE Publications.Common Market Council (2000, June 26). Acta nº 1/2000 - XVIII Reunión del Consejo del Mercado Común [Minute nº 1/2000 - 18th Meeting of the Common Market Council]. Re-trieved from https://documentos.mercosur.int/simfiles/docreuniones/8356_CMC_2000_ACTA01_ES.pdfCommon Market Council (2001a, 21-22 June). Acta nº 1/2001 - XX Reunión del Consejo del Mercado Común [Minute nº 1/2001 - 20th Meeting of the Common Market Council]. Retrieved from https://documentos.mercosur.int/simfiles/docreuniones/213_CMC_2001_ACTA01_ES.pdfCommon Market Council (2001b, 21-22 June). Anexo IV de Acta nº 1/01 – Propuesta sobre bases para el perfeccionamiento del Sistema de Solución de Controversias, presentada por Brasil [Annex 4 of Minute nº 1/01 – Proposals on the foundations for the improvement of the Dispute Settlement System, presented by Brazil]. Retrieved from https://documentos.mercosur.int/simfiles/docreunionanexos/8335_CMC_2001_ACTA01_ANE04_PT_PerfSolControv.pdfCommon Market Council. (2009, July 23). Acta nº 01/09 - XXXVII Reunion del Consejo del Mercado Comun [Minute nº 01/09 - 37th Summit of the Common Market Council]. Retrieved from https://documentos.mercosur.int/simfiles/docreuniones/9974_CMC_2009_ACTA01_ES.pdfCommon Market Council Decision nº 1/1992 – Cronograma de Medidas que Assegurem o Cumprimento dos Objetivos do Tratado de Assunção [Calendar of Measures that Guaran-tee the Compliance to the Objectives of the Treaty of Asunción], June 27, 1991, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1519Common Market Council Decision nº 14/1991 – Sede e Calendário das Reuniões [Loca-tion and Schedule of the Meetings], December 17, 1991, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/14Common Market Council Decision nº 5/1994 – Regime de Adequação [Adequacy Re-gime], August 05, 1994, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1960Common Market Council Decision nº 7/1994 – Tarifa Externa Comum [Common External Tariff], August 05, 1994, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1963Common Market Council Decision nº 9/1994 – Comissão de Comércio do MERCOSUL [MERCOSUR Trade Commission], August 05, 1994, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/565Common Market Council Decision nº 9/1995 – Programa de Ação do MERCOSUL até o Ano 2000 [MERCOSUR Action Program to the Year 2000], December 07, 1995, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1908Common Market Council Decision nº 24/2000 – Relançamento do MERCOSUL Secretar-ia Administrativa do MERCOSUL (SAM) [MERCOSUR Relaunching of the MER-COSUR Administrative Secretariat], June 29, 2000, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1240Common Market Council Decision nº 25/2000 – Relançamento do MERCOSUL Aperfeiçoamento do Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias do Protocolo de Brasília [MERCOSUR Relaunch Improvement of the Dispute Settlement System of the Protocol of Brasília], June 29, 2000, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1241Common Market Council Decision nº 26/2000 – Relançamento do MERCOSUL Análise da estrutura de órgãos dependents do Grupo Mercado Comum e da Comissão de Comércio [MERCOSUR Relaunch Analysis of the Structure of the Dependent Sub-bodies of the Common Market Group and of the Trade Commission], June 29, 2000, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1242Common Market Council Decision nº 59/2000 – Reestruturação dos órgãos dependentes do Grupo Mercado Comum e da Comissão de Comércio do MERCOSUL [Reorganization of the dependent sub-bodies of the Common Market Group and of the MERCOSUR Trade Commission], December 15, 2000, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1298Common Market Council Decision nº 65/2000 – Aperfeiçoamento do Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias [Improvement of the Dispute Settlement System], December 15, 2000, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1309Common Market Council Decision nº 7/2001 – Adequação dos prazos do programa de relançamento do MERCOSUL [Adjustment of the timetables of the MERCOSUR Relaunching program], June 22, 2001, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/782Common Market Council Decision nº 1/2002 – Fortalecimento Institucional [Institutional Strenghtening], February 18, 2002, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/957Common Market Council Decision nº 30/2002 – Transformação da Secretaria Administra-tiva do MERCOSUR em Secretaria Técnica [Transformation of the MERCOSUR Ad-ministrative Secretary into Technical Secretary], December 6, 2002. https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1003Common Market Council Decision nº 11/2003 – Comissão de Representates Permanentes do MERCOSUL [Commission of Permanent Representatives of MERCOSUR], October 6, 2003, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/897Common Market Council Decision nº 13/2003 – Designação dos Consultores Técnicos para o Setor de Assessoria Técnica da Secretaria do MERCOSUL [Designation of the Technical Consultatnts to the Technical Advisory Sector of the MERCOSUR Secretariat], October 5, 2003, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/899Common Market Council Decision nº 26/2003 – Programa de Trabalho do MERCOSUL 2004-2006 [MERCOSUR 2004-2006 Working Program], December 16, 2003, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/912Common Market Council Decision nº 45/2004 – Fundo para a Convergência Estrutural do MERCOSUL [MERCOSUR Structural Convergence Fund], December 16, 2004, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/876Common Market Council Decision nº 1/2005 – Acordo de Sede entre a República do Par-aguai e o Mercado Comum do Sul (MERCOSUL) para o funcionamento do Tribunal Permanente de Revisão [Headquarters Agreement between the Republic of Paraguay and the Common Market of the South [MERCOSUR] for the operation of the Permanent Re-view Tribunal], June 19, 2005, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/697Common Market Council Decision nº 18/2005 – Integração e Funcionamento do Fundo para Convergência Estrutural e Fortalecimento da Estrutura Institucional do MERCOSUL [Integration and Operation of the Fund for the Structural Convergence and Strenghtening of the Instiuttional Structure of MERCOSUR], June 19, 2005, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/720Common Market Council Decision nº 3/2007 – Instituto Social do MERCOSUL [MER-COSUR Social Institute], January 18, 2007, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/186Common Market Council Decision nº 7/2007 – Estrutura e Funcionamento da Secretária do MERCOSUL [Structure and Operation of the MERCOSUR Secretariat], January 18, 2007, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/190Common Market Council Decision nº 54/2007 – Tarefas Conjuntas dos Representantes Permanentes do MERCOSUL [Joint Tasks of the Permanent Representatives of MER-COSUR], December 17, 2007, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/317Common Market Council Decision nº 14/2008 – Regulamento Interno do Conselho do Mercado Comum (Modificação da Decisão CMC nº 02/1998) [Internal Regulations of the Common Market Council (Modification of CMC Decision nº 02/1998)], June 30, 2008, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/125Common Market Council Decision nº 14/2009 – Instituto de Políticas Públicas de Direitos Humanos [Institute of Public Policies on Human Rights], July 23, 2009, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/622Common Market Council Decision nº 63/2010 – Alto Representante-Geral do MER-COSUL [MERCOSUR High General-Representative], December 16, 2010, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/2371Common Market Council Decision nº 65/2010 – Unidade de Apoio à Participação Social [Unit of Support to Social Participation], December 16, 2010, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/2369Common Market Council Decision nº 11/2014 – Funcionamento do Parlamento do MERCOSUL [Operation of the MERCOSUR Parliament], June 2, 2014, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/2938Common Market Council Decision nº 6/2017 – Revogação da Decisão CMC nº 63/10 [Repeal of CMC Decision nª 63/10], July 14, 2017, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/3403Common Market Council Decision nº 30/2017 – Regulamento para o Financiamento da Participação Social [Regulation for the Financing of Social Participation], December 20, 2017, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/3477Common Market Council Decision nº 9/2019 – Estrutura Institucional do MERCOSUL [MERCOSUR’s Institutional Structure], July 16, 2019, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/3756Common Market Council Decision nº 19/2019 – Atualização da Estrutura Institucional do MERCOSUL [Update of MERCOSUR’s Institutional Structure], December 4, 2019, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/3834Common Market Council Decision nº 9/2020 – Funcionamento do Parlamento do MER-COSUL [Operation of the MERCOSUR Parliament], December 4, 2020, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/3956Common Market Council Decision nº 1/2021 – Estrutura Institucional do MERCOSUL [MERCOSUR’s Institutional Structure], July 27, 2021, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/4090Common Market Group. (1991, 21-23 October). Ata nº 3/1991 – III Reunião Ordinária do Grupo Mercado Comum [Minute nº 3/1991 – 3rd Ordinary Meeting of the Common Market Group]. Retrieved from https://documentos.mercosur.int/simfiles/docreuniones/9375_GMC_1991_ACTA03_ES.PDFCommon Market Group. (1998, 7-8 December). Ata nº 04/98 - XXXII Reunião Ordinária do Grupo Mercado Comum [Minute nº 04/98 – 22nd Ordinary Meeting of the Common Market Group]. Retrieved from https://documentos.mercosur.int/simfiles/docreuniones/8575_GMC_1998_ACTA04_PT.pdfCommon Market Group. (2001, 24-25 April). Ata nº 01/01 – XLI Reunión Ordinaria del Grupo Mercado Común [Minute nº 01/01 – 41st Ordinary Meeting of the Common Market Group]. Retrieved from https://documentos.mercosur.int/simfiles/docreuniones/6102_GMC_2001_ACTA01_ES.PDFCommon Market Group Resolution nº 7/1993 – Grupo Ad Hoc “Aspectos Institucionais” [Ad Hoc Group “Institutional Aspects”], April 22, 1993. https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/2200Common Market Group Resolution nº 92/2000 – Estrutura da Secretaria Administrativa do MERCOSUL [Structure of the MERCOSUR Administrative Secretariat], December 7, 2000. https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1345Common Market Group Resolution nº 93/2000 – Manual de cargos e funções da Secretaria Administrativa do MERCOSUL [Manual of positions and functions of the MERCOSUR Administrative Secretariat], December 7, 2000. https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1346Common Market Group Resolution nº 94/2000 – Normas sobre seleção e contratação de pessoal para a Secretaria Administrativa do MERCOSUL [Regulation on the Selection and Hiring of Personnel for the MERCOSUR Administrative Secretariat], December 7, 2000. https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1347Coronado, H., & Gratius, S. (2008). Las asimetrías de poder entre países pequeños y grandes: intereses, alianzas y conflictos [Power asymmetries among small and great countries: interests, alliances and conflicts]. In S. Gratius (Ed.), MERCOSUR y NAFTA: Instituciones y mecanismos de decision en procesos de integración asimétricos [MERCOSUR and NAFTA: Institutions and decision-making mechanisms in asymmetrical integration processes] (pp. 207-272). Iberoamericana.Corrales, J. (2002). The politics of Argentina’s meltdown. World Policy Journal, 19(3), 29-42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40209816Da Rocha, J. S. (2011). O Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias do Mercosul: Aspectos relevantes das medidas compensatórias [The Dispute Settlement System of Mercosur: Relevant aspects of the compensatory measures] [Master’s thesis, Federal University of Santa Catarina]. Repositório Institucional da UFSC. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/95733Dabéne, O. (2005). La relance du Mercosur. Ouro Preto II ou le temps des réformes politiques [The Mercosur Relaunch: Ouro Preto II or the time for political reforms]. Critique internationale, 26(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.3917/crii.026.0035Dabéne, O. (2012). Consistency and Resilience through Cycles of Repoliticization. In P. Riggirozzi, & D. Tussie (Eds.). The Rise of Post-hegemonic Regionalism: The Case of Latin America (pp. 41-64). Springer.Dash, K. C. (2012). Dynamics of South Asian Regionalism. In M. Beeson & R. Stubbs (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism (pp. 419–432). Routledge.De Almeida, P. R. (2002). Mercosul em sua primeira década (1991-2001): Uma avalia-ção política a partir do Brasil [Mercosur in its first decade (1991-2001): A political evalu-ation through Brazil’s perspective]. Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/portuguese/document/MERCOSUL-em-sua-primeira-d%C3%A9cada-(1991-2001)-Uma-avalia%C3%A7%C3%A3o-pol%C3%ADtica-a-partir-do-Brasil.pdfDe Lombaerde, P., Söderbaum, F., Van Langenhove, L., & Baert, F. (2010). The problem of comparison in comparative regionalism. Review of International Studies, 36(3), 731–753. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000707De Klor, A. D., & Pimentel, L. O. (2004). O Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias do Mercosul [The Dispute Settlement System of Mercosur]. In A. D. de Klor, L. O. Pimentel, P. L. Kegel, & W. Barral. Solução de Controvérsias: OMC, União Europeia e Mercosul (pp. 141-233). Konrad-Adenauer-Stifung.Decisión sobre la suspensión de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela en el MERCO-SUR en applicación del Protocolo de Ushuaia sobre compromiso democrático en el MERCOSUR [Decision on the suspensión of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela in MERCOSUR in enforcing the Ushuaia Protocolo on democratic commitment in MER-COSUR, August 5, 2017. https://www.mercosur.int/documento/decision-sobre-la-suspension-de-venezuela-en-el-mercosur/Mercosul confirma a suspensão da Venezuela [Mercosur confirms the suspension of Ve-nezuela] (2016, December 2). Die Welt. https://www.dw.com/pt-br/mercosul-confirma-suspens%C3%A3o-da-venezuela/a-36615922Doctor, M. (2013). Prospects for deepening Mercosur integration: Economic asymmetry and institutional deficits. Review of International Political Economy, 20(3), 515–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.671763Donno, D. (2013). Elections and Democratization in Authoritarian Regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 703–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12013Drummond, M. C. (2011). A opção intergovernanmental do Mercosul e a reforma do Pro-tocolo de Ouro Preto [The intergovernmental option of Mercosur and the reform of the Protocol of Ouro Preto]. Universitas: Relações Internacionais, 9(1), 273-295. https://doi.org/10.5102/uri.v9i1.1382Economic Comission for Latin America and the Caribbean. (2018). Boletín de comercio exterior del MERCOSUR: El rol del MERCOSUR en la integración regional [Report on foreign trade in MERCOSUR: the role of MERCOSUR in regional integration]. United Nations. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/44298/1/S1801158_es.pdfEuropean Council (2021, October 13). Qualified majority. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/council-eu/voting-system/qualified-majority/Fawcett, L., & Gandois, H. (2010). Regionalism in Africa and the Middle East: Implica-tions for EU studies. European Integration, 32(6), 617–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2010.518719Feenstra, R. C.; Inklaar, R.; Timmer, M. P. (2015). The Next Generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150-3182. Available for download at www.ggdc.net/pwt.Ferrari, L., & Tachinardi, M. H. (2000, May 10). Mercosul cria política comum para compras [Mercosur creates common policy for procurements]. Gazeeta Mercantil. Hemeroteca de Política Externa Brasileira. https://hemerotecapeb.lantri.org/lantri/hemeroteca-ris-brasil-vigevani-miyamoto/brasil-america_latina/brasil-america_latina-003791.pdfFernandes, A., & Breve, N. (2001, June 14). Cavallo afirma poder de negociação do Mercosul [Cavallo afirms negotiating power of Mercosur]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B7.FHC quer bloco com instituições supranacionais [FHC wants bloc with supranational institutions]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B8.Figueiredo, O., Paraguassu, F., Salgueiro, S., & Ribas, S. (2001, July 7-8). Suspensas as negociações bilaterais [Bilateral negotiations suspended]. Gazeta Mercantil. Hemeroteca de Política Externa Brasileira. https://hemerotecapeb.lantri.org/lantri/hemeroteca-ris-brasil-vigevani-miyamoto/brasil-argentina/brasil-argentina-001234.pdfFisher adverte que Brasil não pode deter acordo [Fisher adverts that Brazil can not stop agreement]. (2000, December 11). O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B3.Flemes, D. (2007, June). Conceptualising Regional Power in International Relations: Les-sons from the South African Case. (GIGA Working Paper No. 53). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1000123Flemes, D. (2010). Brazil: Strategic Options in the Changing World Order. In D. Flemes (Ed.), Regional leadership in the global system: Ideas, interests and strategies of regional powers (pp. 93–112). Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Gaier, R. V. & Ayres, M. (2019, September 7) Acordo automotivo Brasil-Argentina prevê livre comércio em 2029 [Brazil-Argentina automotive agreement envisions free trade in 2029]. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/macro-argentinabrasil-acordo-idLTAKCN1VR2OYGenna, G. M., & Hiroi, T. (2007). Brazilian regional power in the development of Mer-cosul. Latin American Perspectives, 34(5), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0094582X07306237George, A., & Bennet, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sci-ences. MIT.Gilpin, R. (1975). U.S. power and the multinational corporation (Vol. 2). Basic Books.Gilpin, R. (2001). Global political economy. Princeton University Press.Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R. O., & Slaughter, A.-M. (2000). Introduction: Le-galization and world politics. International Organization, 54(3), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551262Gómez-Mera, L. (2005). Explaining the Survival of MERCOSUR: The Sources of Argen-tine-Brazilian Strategic Convergence. Journal of Latin American Studies, 37(1), 109–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X04008570Gómez-Mera, L. (2016). Lessons from Latin America: MERCOSUR. In D. H. Levine & Nagar, D. (Eds.), Region-Building in Africa (pp. 297–312). Palgrave Macmillan.Gonçalves, J. B. (2008). José Botafogo Gonçalves (testimony, 2008). Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Centro de Pesquisa e Documentação de História Contemporânea do Brasil (CPDOC). https://www.fgv.br/cpdoc/historal/arq/Entrevista1577.pdfGranato, L. (2021). Taking stock of the thirty years of Mercosur. Austral: Brazilian Jour-nal of Strategy & International Relations, 10(19), 9-29. https://doi.org/10.22456/2238-6912.112686Grieco, J. M. (1988). Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: A realist critique of the new-est liberal institutionalism. International Organization, 42(3), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027715Grieco, J. M. (1997). Systemic Sources of Variation in Regional Institutionalization in Western Europe, East Asia, and the Americas. In E. D. Mansfield & H. V. Milner (Eds.), The Political Economy of Regionalism (pp. 164–187). Columbia University Press.Haas, E. B. (2004). The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces (1950-1957) (3rd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press.Haftel, Y. Z. (2004). Violent conflict and regional institutionalization: A virtuous circle? [Doctoral thesis, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_olink/r/1501/10?p10_etd_subid=63451&clear=10Haftel, Y. Z. (2007). Designing for peace: Regional integration arrangements, institutional variation, and militarized interstate disputes. International Organization, 61(1), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070063Haftel, Y. Z. (2012). Regional economic institutions and conflict mitigation: Design, im-plementation, and the promise of peace. University of Michigan Press.Haftel, Y. Z. (2013). Commerce and institutions: Trade, scope, and the design of regional economic organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 8(3), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-012-9162-9Haftel, Y. Z., & Hofmann, S. C. (2017). Institutional authority and security cooperation within regional economic organizations. Journal of Peace Research, 54(4), 484-498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316675908Haftel, Y. Z., & Thompson, A. (2006). The independence of international organizations: Concept and applications. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(2), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022002705285288Haggard, S. (1997). The Political Economy of Regionalism in Asia and the Americas. In E. D. Mansfield & H. V. Milner (Eds.), The Political Economy of Regionalism (pp. 20–49). Columbia University Press.Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.xHancock, K. J. (2009). Regional Integration: Choosing Plutocracy. Palgrave Macmillan.Hartmann, C. (2016). Sub-Saharan Africa. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (pp. 271–294). Oxford University Press.Herbst, J. (2007). Crafting regional cooperation in Africa. In A. Acharya & A. I. Johnston (Eds.), Crafting cooperation: Regional international institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 129–180). Cambridge University Press.Hoffmann, A. R. (2015). Politicization and Legitimacy in MERCOSUR. In A. Hurrelmann, S. Schneider (Eds.), The Legitimacy of Regional Integration in Europe and the Americas. Transformations of the State. Palgrave Macmillan.Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2015). Delegation and pooling in international organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 10(3), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-014-9194-4Hurrell, A. (2005). Hegemony and Regional Governance in the Americas. In Fawcett, L. & Serrano M. (Eds.), Regionalism and Governance in the Americas: Continental Drift (pp. 185-207). Palgrave Macmillan.Iensue, G. (2016). MERCOSUL: Análise dos custos e benefícios no primeiro quartel de século da integração [MERCOSUR: Analysis of the costs and benefits in the first quarter of century of integration]. Revista de la Secretaría del Tribunal Permanente de Revisión, 4(8), 177-208. https://doi.org/10.16890/rstpr.a4.n8.p177Ikenberry, J. (2001). After Victory. Princeton University Press.International Monetary Fund (2023, February 1). Direction of Trade Statistics (DOTS). https://data.imf.org/?sk=9D6028D4-F14A-464C-A2F2-59B2CD424B85Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean (1999). MERCOSUR Report (1998-1999) (No. 5). Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/en/publication/mercosur-report-no-5-1998-1999Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean (2000). MERCOSUR Report (1999-2000) (No. 6). Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/en/mercosur-report-no-6-1999-2000Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean (2001). MERCOSUR Report (2000-2001) (No. 7). Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/en/mercosur-report-no-7-2000-2001Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean (2003). MERCOSUR Report (2001-2002) (No. 8). Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/en/mercosur-report-no-8-2001-2002Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean. (2004). MERCOSUR: In Search of a New Agenda. Rapporteur’s. Inter-American Development Bank - Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/MERCOSUR-In-search-of-a-New-Agenda.pdfInstitute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean. (2009). MERCOSUR Report (2007-2008) (No. 13). Inter-American Development Bank - Institute for the Inte-gration of Latin America and the Caribbean. https://publications.iadb.org/en/publication/mercosur-report-no-13-2007-2008Institute of Public Policies on Human Rights. (n.d.). Quiénes Somos [About Us]. https://www.ippdh.mercosur.int/quienes-somos/Kahler, M. (1995). International Institutions and the Political Economy of Integration. The Brooking Institution.Kaltenthaler, K., & Mora, F. O. (2002). Explaining Latin American economic integration: The case of Mercosur. Review of International Political Economy, 9(1), 72–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290110101108Keohane, R. O. (1980). The Theory of Hegemonic Stability and changes in International Economic Regimes. In O. R. Holsti, R. M. Siverson, & A. George. (Eds). Change in the International System. Westview.Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.Keohane, R. O. (1989). International Institutions and State Power. Westview Press.Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1973). Power and interdependence. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 15(4), 158-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00396337308441409Kindleberger, C. P. (1973). The World in Depression, 1929–1939. University of California Press.Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The Rational Design of International In-stitutions. International Organization, 55(4), 761–799. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801317193592Krapohl, S., Meissner, K. L., & Muntschick, J. (2013). Regional Powers as Leaders or Rambos? The Ambivalent Behaviour of Brazil and South Africa in Regional Economic Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(4), 879–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12116Krasner, S. D. (1976). State power and the structure of international trade. World Politics, 28(3), 317–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009974Krasner, S. D. (1983). International regimes. Cornell University Press.Krasner, S. D. (1991). Global communications and national power: Life on the Pareto frontier. World Politics, 43(3), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010398Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty. Princeton University Press.Kugler, J., & Arbetman, M. (1989). Choosing among measures of power: A review of the empirical record. In R. J. Stoll & M. D. Ward (Eds.), Power in world politics (pp. 49–77). Lynne Rienner Publishers.Kuntz, R. (2000, December 13). Jogo pesado na discussão da Alca [Difficult challenge in FTAA discussion]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B2.Lampreia, L. F. (2002). Mercosul: Reflexões Propectivas [Mercosur: Prospective Reflec-tions]. In C. Hugueney Filho & C. H. Cardim (Eds.), Grupo de Reflexão Prospectiva so-bre o Mercosul [Prospective Reflection Group on Mercosur] (p. 113-116). Fundação Ale-xandre de Gusmão.Laursen, F. (2003). Theoretical Perspectives on Comparative Regional Integration. In F. Laursen (Ed.), Comparative regional integration: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 3–30). Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Lemke, D. (2002). Regions of War and Peace. Cambridge University Press.Lemke, D. (2010). Dimensions of Hard Power: Regional Leadership and Material Capa-bilities. In D. Flemes (Ed.), Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers (pp. 31-50). Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Lenz, T. (2012). Spurred emulation: The EU and regional integration in Mercosur and SADC. West European Politics, 35(1), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.631319Lenz, T., & Marks, G. (2016). Regional Institutional Design. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (pp. 514–538). Oxford Uni-versity Press.Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2013). Informal governance and participation in non-democratic international organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 8, 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-012-9160-yMalamud, A. (2003). Presidentialism and Mercosur: A hidden cause for a successful expe-rience. In F. Laursen (Ed.), Comparative Regional Integration: Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 53–73). Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Malamud, A. (2005a). Mercosur turns 15: Between rising rhetoric and declining achieve-ment. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 18(3), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570500238068Malamud, A. (2005b). Presidential diplomacy and the institutional underpinnings of Mer-cosur: An empirical examination. Latin American Research Review, 40(1), 138–164. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1555368Malamud, A. (2008) La agenda interna del Mercosur: interdependencia, liderazgo, institu-cionalización [The internal agenda of Mercosur: interdependence, leadership, institutional-ization]. In G. Jaramillo (Ed.) Los nuevos enfoques de la integración: más allá del nuevo regionalismo [New integration approaches: beyond new regionalism] (pp. 115-136). FLACO, Sede Ecuador.Malamud, A. (2011). A leader without followers? The growing divergence between the regional and global performance of Brazilian foreign policy. Latin American Politics and Society, 53(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00123.xMalamud, A. (2012). Sovereignty is back, integration out: Latin American travails with regionalism. In J. Roy (Ed.), The State of the Union (s): The Eurozone Crisis, Comparative Regional Integration and the EU Model (pp. 177–190). Miami-Florida European Union Center/Jean Monnet Chair,Malamud, A. (2013). El Mercosur: misión cumplida [Mercosur: mission accomplished]. Revista SAAP, 7(2), 275-282. http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1853-19702013000200005&lng=es&nrm=isoMalamud, A. (2015). Interdependence, leadership and institutionalization: The triple defi-cit and fading prospects of MERCOSUR. In S. Dosenrode (Ed.), Limits to regional inte-gration (pp. 163–178). Routledge.Mallea, R., Spektor, M., & Wheeler, N. J. (2015). The Origins of Nuclear Cooperation: A Critical Oral History of Argentina and Brazil. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars & Fundação Getúlio Vargas. https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/bitstream/handle/10438/13865/ingles.pdfMansfield, E. D. (1993). Concentration, Polarity and the Distribution of Power. Interna-tional Studies Quarterly, 37(1), 105–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600833Mansfield, E. D., & Milner, H. V. (1999). The new wave of regionalism. International Organization, 53(3), 589–627. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899551002Mansfield, E. D., & Milner, H. V. (2012). Votes, Vetoes, and the Political Economy of In-ternational Trade Agreements. Princeton University Press.Mansfield, E. D., & Pevehouse, J. C. (2000). Trade Blocs, Trade Flows, and International Conflict. International Organization, 54(4), 775–808. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551361Mariano, M. P. (2015). A política externa brasileira e a integração regional: uma análise a partir do Mercosul [The Brazilian foreign policy and regional integration: an analysis from Mercosur]. Editora Unesp.Mariano, K. L. P., & Menezes, R. G. (2021). Três décadas de Mercosul: Institucionalida-de, capacidade estatal e baixa intensidade de integração [Three decades of Mercosur: Ins-titutionality, state capacity and low intensity of integration]. Lua Nova, 112, 147-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-147179/112Marin, D. C. (2001, June 20). Brasil e Argentina acertam ponteiros do Mercosul [Brazil and Argentina harmonize their position in Mercosur]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B5.Martins, E. M. O. (2006). Sistemática de Solução de Controvérsias do Mercosul: o Protocolo de Brasília e o Protocolo de Olivos [Dispute Settlement System of Mercosur: the Protocol of Brasília and the Protocol of Olivos]. Cadernos PROLAM/USP, 5(1), 79-93.Mattli, W. (1999). The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge University Press.Mearsheimer, J. (1994/1995). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539078Meissner, K. L. (2017). MERCOSUR. In S. Krapohl (Ed.), Regional Integration in the Global South: External Influence on Economic Cooperation in ASEAN, MERCOSUR and SADC (pp. 147–178). Palgrave Macmillan.Mercopress (2012, June 30). Mercosur Secretary General resigns and walks out from Mendoza summit. Mercopress. https://en.mercopress.com/2012/06/30/mercosur-secretary-general-resigns-and-walks-out-from-the-mendoza-summitMercopress (2021, July 8). Uruguay swears allegiance to Mercosur, but will negotiate in-dependently with third countries. Mercopress. https://en.mercopress.com/2021/07/08/uruguay-swears-allegiance-to-mercosur-but-will-negotiate-independently-with-third-countriesMercosul prepara o seu tribunal [Mercosur prepares its tribunal]. Gazeta Mercantil. Hemeroteca de Política Externa Brasileira. https://hemerotecapeb.lantri.org/lantri/hemeroteca-ris-brasil-vigevani-miyamoto/brasil-america_latina/brasil-america_latina-003020.pdfMERCOSUR Parliament. (n.d.). Historia [History]. https://www.parlamentomercosur.org/innovaportal/v/149/1/parlasur/historia.htmlMERCOSUR Secretariat. (2019, June). MERCOSUL: Estrutura instituticional de funcio-namento. [MERCOSUR: Institutional working framework] (Working Paper no. 02/2019). https://www.cartillaciudadania.mercosur.int/oldAssets/uploads/DT_SM-02_19%20-%20MCS_EstructuraFuncionamiento_PT.pdfMERCOSUR Secretariat. (2021). Informe Técnico de Comercio Exterior 2020 [Technical Report on Foreign Trade 2020]. https://www.mercosur.int/documento/informe-tecnico-de-comercio-exterior/MERCOSUR Secretariat. (2022). Relatório Semestral da Secretaria do MERCOSUL [Semester Report of the MERCOSUR Secretariat] (June 2022) (No. 32). Common Market of the South. https://www.mercosur.int/pt-br/documento/32-relatorio-semestral-da-secretaria-do-mercosul-junho-2022/MERCOSUR Social Institute. (2022). Acerca del ISM [About the MSI]. http://www.ismercosur.org/es/institucional/acerca-del-ism/Ministério da Economia. (n.d.). Comex Stat - General Exports and Imports. http://comexstat.mdic.gov.br/en/geralNabers, D. (2010). Power, leadership, and hegemony in international politics: The case of East Asia. Review of International Studies, 36(4), 931–949. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510001373Neumann, D. (1999, October 5). Lampreia diz que é preciso relançar Mercosul [Lampreia states that it is necessary to relaunch Mercosur]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B4.Nolte, D. (2010). How to compare regional powers: Analytical concepts and research top-ics. Review of International Studies, 36(4), 881–901. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051000135XOlson, M. (1971). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Revised edition). Harvard University Press.Palacios, A. (1999a, October 13). De la Rúa quer integração mais rápida entre sócios do Mercosul [De la Rúa wants faster integration between Mercosur partners]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, A17.Palacios, A. (1999b, November 16). Para embaixador, Mercosul carece de medida de impacto [For ambassador, Mercosur lacks impactful action]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, A8.Palacios, A. (2000a, March 25). Brasil e Argentina tentarão resolver outras pendências [Brazil and Argentina will try to solve other pending issues]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B10.Palacios, A. (2000b, April 7). Países definem nova agenda do Mercosul [Countries define new agenda of Mercosur]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B9.Palacios, A. (2001a, April 4). Ministro dispõe-se a retroceder na redução de tarifas alfandegárias [Minister shall backtrack on the reduction of customs tariffs]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B5.Palacios, A. (2001b, May 11). Mercosul precisa mudar, diz Giavarini [Mercosur must change, says Giavarini]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B6.Pedersen, T. (2002). Cooperative hegemony: Power, ideas and institutions in regional in-tegration. Review of International Studies, 28(4), 677–696. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210502006770Pena, C., Rozemberg, R. (2005, March). MERCOSUR: A different approach to institution-al development (FOCAL Policy Paper No. FPP-05-06). https://www.focal.ca/pdf/mercosur_Pena-Ro-zemberg_different%20approach%20institutional%20development_March%202005_FPP-05-06_e.pdfPereira, L.V. (1999) Toward the Common Market of the South: MERCOSUR’s Origins, Evolutions and Challenges. In R. Riordan (Ed.), MERCOSUR: Regional Integration, World Markets (pp. 7-24). Lynne Rienner Publishers.Perotti, A. D. (2001). Proyecto de Reformas al Protocolo de Brasilia. Una nueva oportunidad perdida [Project of reform to the Protocol of Brasília. A new lost opportunity]. Scientia Iuris, 5(6), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2002v5n0p1Perry, G. E., & Servén, L. (2003, June). The Anatomy of a Multiple Crisis: Why Was Argentina Special and What Can We Learn from it? (The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3081). The World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/18175Pevehouse, J. C. (2002). With a little help from my friends? Regional organizations and the consolidation of democracy. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 611–626. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088403Pfeifer, I., & Quadros, M. (2001, April 2). Brasil reage contra TEC na informática [Brazil reacts against common external tariff on computing products]. Gazeta Mercantil. Hemero-teca de Política Externa Brasileira. https://hemerotecapeb.lantri.org/lantri/hemeroteca-ris-brasil-vigevani-miyamoto/brasil-argentina/brasil-argentina-001400.pdfPierson, P. (1996). The path to European integration: A historical institutionalist analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 29(2), 123–163. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0010414096029002001Pietrafesa, P. A. (2011). Parlamento do Mercosul: formação, características e desafios [Mercosur Parliament: formation, characteristics and challenges]. Universitas: Relações Internacionais, 9(1), 199-226. https://doi.org/10.5102/uri.v9i1.1377Protocol of Brasília for the Solution of Controversies, December 17, 1991. http://www.sice.oas.org/trade/mrcsr/brasilia/pbrasiliaText_e.aspProtocol of Ouro Preto - Additional Protocol to the Treaty of Asunción on the Institu-tional Framework of MERCOSUR, December 17, 1994. http://www.sice.oas.org/trade/mrcsr/ourop/ourop_e.aspProtocolo Constitutivo do Parlamento do MERCOSUL [Constituve Protocol of the MERCOSUR Parliament], December 2, 2005, https://www.mercosur.int/pt-br/documento/protocolo-constitutivo-do-parlamento-mercosul/Rebossio, A. (2013, December 19). Paraguai volta atrás e aprova a entrada da Venezuela no Mercosul [Paraguay backtracks and approves the entry of Venezuela in Mercosur]. El País. https://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2013/12/19/internacional/1387413875_732555.htmlResende‐Santos, J. (2002). The origins of security cooperation in the southern cone. Latin American Politics and Society, 44(4), 89–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2002.tb00224.xReuters (2015, July 18). Bolivia to join Mercosur as full member. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/brazil-mercosur-bolivia-idUSE5N0V801V20150717Riggirozzi, P., & Tussie, D. (Eds.) (2012). The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism: The Case of Latin America. Springer.Rittner, D. (2014, August 13). Tribunal do Mercosul complete dez anos tentando fugir da irrelevância [Mercosur Tribunal reaches ten years trying to avoid irrelevance]. Valor Econômico. https://valor.globo.com/brasil/coluna/tribunal-do-mercosul-completa-dez-anos-tentando-fugir-da-irrelevancia.ghtmlRosamond, B. (2000). Theories of European Integration. Bloomsbury Publishing.Sanahuja, J. A. (2009). Del “regionalismo abierto” al “regionalismo post-liberal”. Crisis y cambio en la integración regional en América Latina [From “open regionalism” to “post-liberal regionalism”. Crisis and change in regional integration in Latin America]. In L. M. Alfonso, L. Peña, M. Vazquez (Eds.) Anuario de la Integración Regional de América La-tina y el Gran Caribe [Yearbook of Regional Integration of Latin America and the Great Caribbean] (2008-2009) (Nº 7). Coordinadora Regional de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales, 11-54. https://www.cries.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/anuario-integracion-2008-2009.pdfSandler, T. (1991, September). The Logic of Collective Action: Theory and Applications (Institute for Policy Reform No. IPR20). https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.294668Schelhase, M. (2010). The Successes, Failures and Future of Mercosur. In G. Mace, A. W. Cooper, & T. M. Shaw (Eds.), Inter-American Cooperation at a Crossroads (pp. 171–186). Palgrave Macmillan.Schneider, C. J. (2017). The political economy of regional integration. Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-023006Schirm, S. A. (2010). Leaders in need of followers: Emerging powers in global govern-ance. European Journal of International Relations, 16(2), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109342922Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2004). Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 661–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000248089Smith, J. M. (2000). The politics of dispute settlement design: Explaining legalism in re-gional trade pacts. International Organization, 54(1), 137–180. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551145Snidal, D. (1985). The limits of hegemonic stability theory. International Organization, 39(4), 579–614. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002703XSöderbaum, F. (2016). Old, New, and Comparative Regionalism: The History and Schol-arly Development of the Field. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (pp. 16–40). Oxford University Press.Sotero, P. (2000, October 17). Brasil responde a críticas dos EUA sobre Alca [Brazil answers to USA critics over the FTAA]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B18.Sotero, P. (2001, May 7). Cavallo nos EUA volta a atacar o Mercosul [Cavallo in the USA attacks Mercosur again]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B1.Spektor, M. (2002). O Brasil e a Argentina entre a cordialidade oficial e o projeto de inte-gração: A política externa do governo de Ernesto Geisel (1974-1979). Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 45, 117–145. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292002000100005Spektor, M. (2010). Brazil: The Underlying Ideas of Regional Policies. In D. Flemes (Ed.), Regional leadership in the global system: Ideas, interests and strategies of regional powers (pp. 191–206). Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Sweet, A. S., & Sandholtz, W. (1998). Integration, Supranational Governance, and the Institutionalization of the European Polity. In A. Sweet & W. Sandholtz (Eds.), European Integration and Supranational Governance (pp. 1–26). Oxford University Press.Sweet, A.S., Sandholtz, W., & Fligstein, N. (2001). The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford University Press.Tachinardi, M. L. (1995, October 20). Brasil, entre os interesses nacionais e os do Mercosul [Brazil, between national interests and those of Mercosur]. Gazeta Mercantil. Hemeroteca de Política Externa Brasileira. https://hemerotecapeb.lantri.org/lantri/hemeroteca-ris-brasil-vigevani-miyamoto/brasil-america_latina/brasil-america_latina-002954.pdfTallberg, J., & Smith, J. M. (2014). Dispute settlement in world politics: States, supranational prosecutors, and compliance. European Journal of International Relations, 20(1), 118-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661114345Taylor, S. (2016). Region-Building in Southern Africa. In D. H. Levine & N. Dawn (Eds.), Region-Building in Africa (pp. 157–174). Palgrave Macmillan.Télam (2005, October 25). Por primera vez se vota por legisladores argentinos para el Par-lasur [For the first time Argentina votes for Parlasur legislators]. Télam. https://www.telam.com.ar/notas/201510/124723-elecciones-2015-voto-popular-legisladores-parlasur.htmlTorrent, R. (2000). Três idéias sobre a institucionalização do MERCOSUL [Three ideas on MERCOSUR institutionalization]. Revista Brasileira de Comércio Exterior, 62.Treaty of Asunción for the establishment of a Common Market between the Argentine Republic, the Federal Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Eastern Re-public of Uruguay, March 26, 1991, http://www.sice.oas.org/trade/mrcsr/TreatyAsun_e.aspUE e Mercosul apressam o passo [UE and Mercosur hasten speed]. (2001, March 26). O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, A3.United Nations. (2021). Statistical Yearbook 2021 edition. Sixty-fourth issue. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publications/statistical-yearbook/United Nations Development Programme. (2021). Human Development Report 2020. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2020Uruguai e EUA estão negociando um pacto comercial [Uruguay and USA negotiating trade agreement]. (2001, May ). O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil,Vaz, A. C. (2002). Cooperação, integração e processo negociador: A construção do Mer-cosul [Cooperation, integration and negotiation process: the construction of Mercosur]. IBRI.Veiga, P. M. (2004, July). MERCOSUR’s Institutionalization Agenda: The Challenges of a Project in Crisis (IDB-INTAL Working Paper -SITI- 06E). https://publications.iadb.org/en/mercosurs-institutionalization-agenda-challenges-project-crisisVeiga, P. M., & Rios, S. P. (2002). O Mercosul na encruzilhada: uma agenda para os pró-ximos anos [Mercosur at the crossroads: an agenda for the next years]. In C. Hugueney Filho & C.H. Cardim (Eds.), Grupo de Reflexão Prospectiva sobre o Mercosul [Prospecti-ve Reflection Group on Mercosur] (p. 161-168). Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão.World Trade Organization. (2017). A Handbook on the WTO Dispute Settlement System (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.Yoo, I. T. (2017). Power concentration or parity? The conditional influence of power dis-tribution in regional economic integration. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 17(2), 203–232. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcw007 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS)
108862004資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108862004 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 吳崇涵 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Wu, Chong-han en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 穆守仁 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Bragança, Murilo en_US dc.creator (作者) 穆守仁 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Bragança, Murilo en_US dc.date (日期) 2023 en_US dc.date.accessioned 9-三月-2023 18:46:24 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 9-三月-2023 18:46:24 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-三月-2023 18:46:24 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0108862004 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/143872 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 108862004 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 權力集中對區域制度的設計及實踐會產生什麼影響？是什麼原因以及在什麼條件下，區域強權會接受建立更獨立的區域制度？本研究認為，在區域組織中，若權力集中於一個佔優勢的國家時，此組織的設計和實踐會受到影響。本研究運用過程回溯法分析南美洲的南方共同市場（MERCOSUR），發現身為區域強權的巴西較偏好缺乏獨立性的機構。而當面臨巴西為何在2002年接受區域制度更具獨立性的難題時，本研究認為Pedersen（2002）的合作性霸權途徑可以做出解釋，具體來說，巴西接受區域制度更具獨立性的原因是為了在不利的情況下維持該組織的凝聚力。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) What is the effect of power concentration in the design and implementation of regional institutions? Why, and in what conditions, regional great powers accept the establishment of more independent formats of regional institutions? This thesis argues that the concentration of power in a preponderant state within a regional organization affects the design and implementation of regional institutions. By employing process-tracing to study the Common Market of the South (MERCOSUR) in South America, it finds that Brazil as a regional great power preferred institutions that lacked independence. Faced with the puzzle on why Brazil accepted more independent institutions in 2002, it argues that Pedersen (2002)’s cooperative hegemony approach help explain these events. More specifically, that Brazil accepted more institutional independence as a side-payment to maintain the bloc`s cohesion in an adverse scenario. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents CHAPTER 1.INTRODUCTION 1CHAPTER 2. POWER AND INSTITUTIONS - THEORY AND PRACTICE 4I. Literature Review 41. Theories of regional 41.1. Regional power 51.2. Regional institutions 61.3. Synthesis and realist 82. Case study: The ‘Common Market of the South’ (MERCOSUR) 102.1. Argentine-Brazilian rapprochement and the road to the common market 112.2. The golden period of trade liberalization (1991-1999) 132.3. Crisis and stagnation (1999-2021) 153. Explaining MERCOSUR’s stagnation 183.1. Asymmetry and leadership deficit 183.2. Asymmetry and institutional deficit 20II. Research Design 23CHAPTER 3. INSTITUTIONAL INDEPENDENCE IN MERCOSUR 33I. Institutional Evolution 331. The foundational phase (1991-2002) 332. The expansion phase (2003-2015) 373. The revision phase (2016-) 39II. Institutional Framework 41III. Institutional Independence in MERCOSUR 451. Decision-making procedures 462. Corporate bureaucracy 473. Dispute settlement mechanism 49IV. MERCOSUR’s Two Cases of Institutional Independence 50CHAPTER 4. PROCESS-TRACING OF INSTITUTIONAL INDEPENDENCE IN MERCOSUR 53I. Establishing the Institutional Framework (1991-1994) 531. The Treaty of Asunción (1991) 532. The Protocol of Brasília (1991) 553. The Protocol of Ouro Preto (1994) 57II. Reforming the Institutional Framework (2000-2002) 591. Antecedents and context to the MERCOSUR Relaunch 592. The MERCOSUR Relaunch Agenda (2000-2002) 612.1. The Buenos Aires Summit and the Ad Hoc Group on Institutional Affairs 622.2. The Florianópolis Summit and the High-Level Group 653. Understanding the Brazilian position 67CHAPTER 5. CONCLUSION 74REFERENCES 78APPENDICES 109 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2767399 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108862004 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 權力集中 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 制度獨立性 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 區域整合 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 南方共同市場 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Power concentration en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Institutional independence en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Regional integration en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) MERCOSUR en_US dc.title (題名) 區域整合中之權力集中與制度獨立性：以南錐共同體為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Power Concentration and Institutional Independence in Regional Integration: The Case of MERCOSUR en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (1998). Why states act through formal international organiza-tions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002798042001001Abbott, K. W., Keohane R. O., Slaughter A. M., Snidal D. (2000). The Concept of Legal-ization. International Organization, 54(3), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551271Abreu, S. (2000). Uruguay: socio pequeño del Mercosur [Uruguay: Small partner of Mercosur]. In F. Mateo (Ed.), Los países pequeños: Su rol en los procesos de integración [The small countries: Their role in integration processes] (p. 41-77). Inter-American Development Bank – Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean. https://publications.iadb.org/es/publicacion/14608/los-paises-pequenos-su-rol-en-los-procesos-de-integracionAcordo bilateral com Washington não deve ser descartado, diz Cavallo [Bilateral agreement with Washington should not be discarded, says Cavallo]. (2001, May 4). O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B12.Amaral, S. M. C. (2007). A dinâmica das relações comerciais do Mercosul à luz dos instrumentos de política comercial (1998-2005) [The dynamics of trade relations in Mercosur in view of commercial policy instruments]. [Master’s thesis, University of Brasília]. Repositório Institucional da UnB. https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/2694Arai, A. L. (1997, December 15). Um não diplomática aos magistrados [A diplomatic “no” to magistrates]. Gazeta Mercantil. Hemeroteca de Política Externa Brasileira. https://hemerotecapeb.lantri.org/lantri/hemeroteca-ris-brasil-vigevani-miyamoto/brasil-america_latina/brasil-america_latina-005187.pdfArashiro, Z. (2011). Negotiating the Free Trade Area of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan.Argentinos defendem anteicpação da Alca [Argentines defend antecipation of the FTAA] (2001, February 6). O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B3.Arnold, C. (2017). Empty promises and nonincorporation in Mercosur. International In-teractions, 43(4), 643–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2016.1206391Arnold, C., & Rittberger, B. (2013). The legalization of dispute resolution in Mercosur. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 5(3), 97–132. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1866802X1300500304Avança idéia de moeda única na área do Mercosul (2001, December 22). O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B7.Aydin, A. (2010). The deterrent effects of economic integration. Journal of Peace Re-search, 47(5), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022343310370290Azoulai, L.; & Dehousse, R. (2012). The European Court of Justice and the Legal Dynamics of Integration. In E. Jones, A. Menon, & S. Weatherhill (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the European Union (pp. 350-364). Oxford University Press.Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase mem-bers’ international trade? Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005Baptista, L. O. (1996). O Mercosul após o Protocolo de Ouro Preto [Mercosur after the Protocol of Ouro Preto]. Estudos Avançados, 10(27), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40141996000200011Barral, W. (2003). O novo sistema de solução de controvérsias do Mercosul [The new dispute settlement system of Mercosur]. In A. G. de Azevedo (Ed.). Estudos em Arbitragem, Mediação e Negociação [Studies on Arbitration, Mediation and Negotiation] (pp. 49-70). Fundação Universidade de Brasília.Bastos, L. A., Dias, R., Monção, B. A., da Silva, K. J. (2016). Os reflexos das crises internacionais da década de 1990 nas economias-membro do Mercosul [The impacts of the international crisis of the decade of 1990 in the member-economies of Mercosur]. Revista NUPEM, 4(6), 164-181. https://doi.org/10.33871/nupem.v4i6.104Bearce, D. H., & Omori, S. (2005). How do commercial institutions promote peace? Jour-nal of Peace Research, 42(6), 659–678. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022343305057886Bianculli, A. C. (2016). Latin America. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (pp. 154–177). Oxford University Press.Boehmer, C., Gartzke, E., & Nordstrom, T. (2004). Do intergovernmental organizations promote peace? World Politics, 57(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2005.0008Börzel, T. A. (2016). Theorizing Regionalism: Cooperation, Integration, and Governance. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (pp. 41–63). Oxford University Press.Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2016). Introduction. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Ox-ford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (pp. 4–16). Oxford University Press.Bouzas, R. (2001). El Mercosur diez años despues. ¿Proceso de aprendizaje o déjà vu? [Mercosur after ten years. Learning process or déjà vu?] Desarollo Económico, 41(162), 180-200. https://doi.org/10.2307/3455985Bouzas, R. (2008). Regional governance institutions, asymmetries, and deeper integration in MERCOSUR. In J. S. Blyde, E. Fernández-Arias, & P. Giordano (Eds.), Deepening Integration in Mercosur: Dealing with Disparities (pp. 355–379). Inter-American Devel-opment Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/en/deepening-integration-mercosur-dealing-disparitiesBouzas, R., Gratius, S., Soltz, H., Sberro, S. (2008a). Teoría y práctica de las instituciones y procesos de decisión [Theory and practice of institutions and decision-making proces-ses]. In S. Gratius (Ed.), MERCOSUR y NAFTA: Instituciones y mecanismos de decision en procesos de integración asimétricos [MERCOSUR and NAFTA: Institutions and deci-sion-making mechanisms in asymmetrical integration processes] (pp. 33-96). Iberoameri-cana.Bouzas, R., Coronado, H., Mena, A. O., Soltz, H. (2008b). La eficacia de los mecanismos de solución de controversias [The effectiveness of the dispute settlement mechanisms]. In S. Gratius (Ed.), MERCOSUR y NAFTA: Instituciones y mecanismos de decision en procesos de integración asimétricos [MERCOSUR and NAFTA: Institutions and decision-making mechanisms in asymmetrical integration processes] (pp. 97-109). Iberoamericana.Burges, S. W. (2006). Without sticks or carrots: Brazilian leadership in South America during the Cardoso Era, 1992–2003. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 25(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0261-3050.2006.00151.xBressan, R. N. (2012). A institucionalização do Mercsul e o Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias [The institutionalization of Mercosur and the Dispute Settlement System]. Perspectivas, 42, 17-39.Briceño-Ruiz, J., & Morales, I. (2017). Introduction. In J. Briceño-Ruiz, & I. Morales (Eds.), Post-Hegemonic Regionalism in the Americas (pp. 1-15). Routledge.Caetano, G. (2011). Breve historia del MERCOSUR en sus 20 años. Coyunturas e instuciones (1991-2011) [Brief history of MERCOSUR in its 20 years. Conjunctures and institutions (1991-2011). In G. Caetano (Ed.) MERCOSUR: 20 años [MERCOSUR: 20 years] (pp. 21-74). Centro de Formación para la Integración Regional (CEFIR).Caichiolo, R. (2020). Mercosur: Limits of Regional Integration. Erasmus Law Review, 12(3), 246-268. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3681278Caminoto, J. (2001, April 20). Cavallo diz preferir acordo bilateral com so EUA [Cavallo prefers bilateral agreement with the USA]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B5.Campos, G. L. (2016). From success to failure: Under what conditions did Mercosur inte-grate? Journal of Economic Integration, 31(4), 855–897. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44028249Candeas, A. (2017). A Integração Brasil-Argentina: História de uma ideia na “visão do outro” [Brazil-Argentina Integration: History of an idea in the “perspective of the other”] (2nd ed.). Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão.Cardoso, F. H. (2001, June 22). Discurso na Reunião de Cúpula do Mercosul, por ocasião da Reunião do Conselho do Mercado Comum [Speech in the Meeting of the Mercosur Summit, by occasion of Summit of the Common Market Council]. Available at http://www.biblioteca.presidencia.gov.br/presidencia/ex-presidentes/fernando-henrique-cardoso/discursos/2o-mandato/2001/62.pdf/viewCarranza, M. (2000). South American Free Trade Area or Free Trade Area of the Americas? Open Regionalism and the Future of Regional Economic Integration in South America. Routledge.Carranza, M.E. (2017). Resilient or Declining? Mercosur and the Future of Post-Liberal Regionalism in Latin America. In J. Briceño-Ruiz, I. Morales (Eds.), Post-Hegemonic Re-gionalism in the Americas: Toward a Pacific-Atlantic Divide? (pp. 125-140). Routledge.Cason, J. (2000). On the Road to Southern Cone Economic Integration. Journal of Inter-american Studies and World Affairs, 42(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/166464Chade, J. (2001, March 23). UE pretende ter com o Mercosul um acordo mais amplo que a Alca [EU intends to have a broader agreement with Mercosur than FTAA]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B7.Chodor, T. (2021). The Changing Face of Mercosur: Legitimacy and the Politics of Scale in South American Regionalism. Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(2), 417-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13200Choi, Y. J., & Caporaso, J. A. (2002). Comparative regional integration. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse-Kappen, T. Risse, B. A. Simmons (Eds.) Handbook of International Relations (pp. 480-499). SAGE Publications.Common Market Council (2000, June 26). Acta nº 1/2000 - XVIII Reunión del Consejo del Mercado Común [Minute nº 1/2000 - 18th Meeting of the Common Market Council]. Re-trieved from https://documentos.mercosur.int/simfiles/docreuniones/8356_CMC_2000_ACTA01_ES.pdfCommon Market Council (2001a, 21-22 June). Acta nº 1/2001 - XX Reunión del Consejo del Mercado Común [Minute nº 1/2001 - 20th Meeting of the Common Market Council]. Retrieved from https://documentos.mercosur.int/simfiles/docreuniones/213_CMC_2001_ACTA01_ES.pdfCommon Market Council (2001b, 21-22 June). Anexo IV de Acta nº 1/01 – Propuesta sobre bases para el perfeccionamiento del Sistema de Solución de Controversias, presentada por Brasil [Annex 4 of Minute nº 1/01 – Proposals on the foundations for the improvement of the Dispute Settlement System, presented by Brazil]. Retrieved from https://documentos.mercosur.int/simfiles/docreunionanexos/8335_CMC_2001_ACTA01_ANE04_PT_PerfSolControv.pdfCommon Market Council. (2009, July 23). Acta nº 01/09 - XXXVII Reunion del Consejo del Mercado Comun [Minute nº 01/09 - 37th Summit of the Common Market Council]. Retrieved from https://documentos.mercosur.int/simfiles/docreuniones/9974_CMC_2009_ACTA01_ES.pdfCommon Market Council Decision nº 1/1992 – Cronograma de Medidas que Assegurem o Cumprimento dos Objetivos do Tratado de Assunção [Calendar of Measures that Guaran-tee the Compliance to the Objectives of the Treaty of Asunción], June 27, 1991, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1519Common Market Council Decision nº 14/1991 – Sede e Calendário das Reuniões [Loca-tion and Schedule of the Meetings], December 17, 1991, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/14Common Market Council Decision nº 5/1994 – Regime de Adequação [Adequacy Re-gime], August 05, 1994, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1960Common Market Council Decision nº 7/1994 – Tarifa Externa Comum [Common External Tariff], August 05, 1994, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1963Common Market Council Decision nº 9/1994 – Comissão de Comércio do MERCOSUL [MERCOSUR Trade Commission], August 05, 1994, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/565Common Market Council Decision nº 9/1995 – Programa de Ação do MERCOSUL até o Ano 2000 [MERCOSUR Action Program to the Year 2000], December 07, 1995, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1908Common Market Council Decision nº 24/2000 – Relançamento do MERCOSUL Secretar-ia Administrativa do MERCOSUL (SAM) [MERCOSUR Relaunching of the MER-COSUR Administrative Secretariat], June 29, 2000, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1240Common Market Council Decision nº 25/2000 – Relançamento do MERCOSUL Aperfeiçoamento do Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias do Protocolo de Brasília [MERCOSUR Relaunch Improvement of the Dispute Settlement System of the Protocol of Brasília], June 29, 2000, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1241Common Market Council Decision nº 26/2000 – Relançamento do MERCOSUL Análise da estrutura de órgãos dependents do Grupo Mercado Comum e da Comissão de Comércio [MERCOSUR Relaunch Analysis of the Structure of the Dependent Sub-bodies of the Common Market Group and of the Trade Commission], June 29, 2000, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1242Common Market Council Decision nº 59/2000 – Reestruturação dos órgãos dependentes do Grupo Mercado Comum e da Comissão de Comércio do MERCOSUL [Reorganization of the dependent sub-bodies of the Common Market Group and of the MERCOSUR Trade Commission], December 15, 2000, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1298Common Market Council Decision nº 65/2000 – Aperfeiçoamento do Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias [Improvement of the Dispute Settlement System], December 15, 2000, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1309Common Market Council Decision nº 7/2001 – Adequação dos prazos do programa de relançamento do MERCOSUL [Adjustment of the timetables of the MERCOSUR Relaunching program], June 22, 2001, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/782Common Market Council Decision nº 1/2002 – Fortalecimento Institucional [Institutional Strenghtening], February 18, 2002, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/957Common Market Council Decision nº 30/2002 – Transformação da Secretaria Administra-tiva do MERCOSUR em Secretaria Técnica [Transformation of the MERCOSUR Ad-ministrative Secretary into Technical Secretary], December 6, 2002. https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1003Common Market Council Decision nº 11/2003 – Comissão de Representates Permanentes do MERCOSUL [Commission of Permanent Representatives of MERCOSUR], October 6, 2003, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/897Common Market Council Decision nº 13/2003 – Designação dos Consultores Técnicos para o Setor de Assessoria Técnica da Secretaria do MERCOSUL [Designation of the Technical Consultatnts to the Technical Advisory Sector of the MERCOSUR Secretariat], October 5, 2003, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/899Common Market Council Decision nº 26/2003 – Programa de Trabalho do MERCOSUL 2004-2006 [MERCOSUR 2004-2006 Working Program], December 16, 2003, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/912Common Market Council Decision nº 45/2004 – Fundo para a Convergência Estrutural do MERCOSUL [MERCOSUR Structural Convergence Fund], December 16, 2004, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/876Common Market Council Decision nº 1/2005 – Acordo de Sede entre a República do Par-aguai e o Mercado Comum do Sul (MERCOSUL) para o funcionamento do Tribunal Permanente de Revisão [Headquarters Agreement between the Republic of Paraguay and the Common Market of the South [MERCOSUR] for the operation of the Permanent Re-view Tribunal], June 19, 2005, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/697Common Market Council Decision nº 18/2005 – Integração e Funcionamento do Fundo para Convergência Estrutural e Fortalecimento da Estrutura Institucional do MERCOSUL [Integration and Operation of the Fund for the Structural Convergence and Strenghtening of the Instiuttional Structure of MERCOSUR], June 19, 2005, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/720Common Market Council Decision nº 3/2007 – Instituto Social do MERCOSUL [MER-COSUR Social Institute], January 18, 2007, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/186Common Market Council Decision nº 7/2007 – Estrutura e Funcionamento da Secretária do MERCOSUL [Structure and Operation of the MERCOSUR Secretariat], January 18, 2007, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/190Common Market Council Decision nº 54/2007 – Tarefas Conjuntas dos Representantes Permanentes do MERCOSUL [Joint Tasks of the Permanent Representatives of MER-COSUR], December 17, 2007, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/317Common Market Council Decision nº 14/2008 – Regulamento Interno do Conselho do Mercado Comum (Modificação da Decisão CMC nº 02/1998) [Internal Regulations of the Common Market Council (Modification of CMC Decision nº 02/1998)], June 30, 2008, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/125Common Market Council Decision nº 14/2009 – Instituto de Políticas Públicas de Direitos Humanos [Institute of Public Policies on Human Rights], July 23, 2009, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/622Common Market Council Decision nº 63/2010 – Alto Representante-Geral do MER-COSUL [MERCOSUR High General-Representative], December 16, 2010, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/2371Common Market Council Decision nº 65/2010 – Unidade de Apoio à Participação Social [Unit of Support to Social Participation], December 16, 2010, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/2369Common Market Council Decision nº 11/2014 – Funcionamento do Parlamento do MERCOSUL [Operation of the MERCOSUR Parliament], June 2, 2014, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/2938Common Market Council Decision nº 6/2017 – Revogação da Decisão CMC nº 63/10 [Repeal of CMC Decision nª 63/10], July 14, 2017, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/3403Common Market Council Decision nº 30/2017 – Regulamento para o Financiamento da Participação Social [Regulation for the Financing of Social Participation], December 20, 2017, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/3477Common Market Council Decision nº 9/2019 – Estrutura Institucional do MERCOSUL [MERCOSUR’s Institutional Structure], July 16, 2019, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/3756Common Market Council Decision nº 19/2019 – Atualização da Estrutura Institucional do MERCOSUL [Update of MERCOSUR’s Institutional Structure], December 4, 2019, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/3834Common Market Council Decision nº 9/2020 – Funcionamento do Parlamento do MER-COSUL [Operation of the MERCOSUR Parliament], December 4, 2020, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/3956Common Market Council Decision nº 1/2021 – Estrutura Institucional do MERCOSUL [MERCOSUR’s Institutional Structure], July 27, 2021, https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/4090Common Market Group. (1991, 21-23 October). Ata nº 3/1991 – III Reunião Ordinária do Grupo Mercado Comum [Minute nº 3/1991 – 3rd Ordinary Meeting of the Common Market Group]. Retrieved from https://documentos.mercosur.int/simfiles/docreuniones/9375_GMC_1991_ACTA03_ES.PDFCommon Market Group. (1998, 7-8 December). Ata nº 04/98 - XXXII Reunião Ordinária do Grupo Mercado Comum [Minute nº 04/98 – 22nd Ordinary Meeting of the Common Market Group]. Retrieved from https://documentos.mercosur.int/simfiles/docreuniones/8575_GMC_1998_ACTA04_PT.pdfCommon Market Group. (2001, 24-25 April). Ata nº 01/01 – XLI Reunión Ordinaria del Grupo Mercado Común [Minute nº 01/01 – 41st Ordinary Meeting of the Common Market Group]. Retrieved from https://documentos.mercosur.int/simfiles/docreuniones/6102_GMC_2001_ACTA01_ES.PDFCommon Market Group Resolution nº 7/1993 – Grupo Ad Hoc “Aspectos Institucionais” [Ad Hoc Group “Institutional Aspects”], April 22, 1993. https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/2200Common Market Group Resolution nº 92/2000 – Estrutura da Secretaria Administrativa do MERCOSUL [Structure of the MERCOSUR Administrative Secretariat], December 7, 2000. https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1345Common Market Group Resolution nº 93/2000 – Manual de cargos e funções da Secretaria Administrativa do MERCOSUL [Manual of positions and functions of the MERCOSUR Administrative Secretariat], December 7, 2000. https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1346Common Market Group Resolution nº 94/2000 – Normas sobre seleção e contratação de pessoal para a Secretaria Administrativa do MERCOSUL [Regulation on the Selection and Hiring of Personnel for the MERCOSUR Administrative Secretariat], December 7, 2000. https://normas.mercosur.int/public/normativas/1347Coronado, H., & Gratius, S. (2008). Las asimetrías de poder entre países pequeños y grandes: intereses, alianzas y conflictos [Power asymmetries among small and great countries: interests, alliances and conflicts]. In S. Gratius (Ed.), MERCOSUR y NAFTA: Instituciones y mecanismos de decision en procesos de integración asimétricos [MERCOSUR and NAFTA: Institutions and decision-making mechanisms in asymmetrical integration processes] (pp. 207-272). Iberoamericana.Corrales, J. (2002). The politics of Argentina’s meltdown. World Policy Journal, 19(3), 29-42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40209816Da Rocha, J. S. (2011). O Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias do Mercosul: Aspectos relevantes das medidas compensatórias [The Dispute Settlement System of Mercosur: Relevant aspects of the compensatory measures] [Master’s thesis, Federal University of Santa Catarina]. Repositório Institucional da UFSC. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/95733Dabéne, O. (2005). La relance du Mercosur. Ouro Preto II ou le temps des réformes politiques [The Mercosur Relaunch: Ouro Preto II or the time for political reforms]. Critique internationale, 26(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.3917/crii.026.0035Dabéne, O. (2012). Consistency and Resilience through Cycles of Repoliticization. In P. Riggirozzi, & D. Tussie (Eds.). The Rise of Post-hegemonic Regionalism: The Case of Latin America (pp. 41-64). Springer.Dash, K. C. (2012). Dynamics of South Asian Regionalism. In M. Beeson & R. Stubbs (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism (pp. 419–432). Routledge.De Almeida, P. R. (2002). Mercosul em sua primeira década (1991-2001): Uma avalia-ção política a partir do Brasil [Mercosur in its first decade (1991-2001): A political evalu-ation through Brazil’s perspective]. Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/portuguese/document/MERCOSUL-em-sua-primeira-d%C3%A9cada-(1991-2001)-Uma-avalia%C3%A7%C3%A3o-pol%C3%ADtica-a-partir-do-Brasil.pdfDe Lombaerde, P., Söderbaum, F., Van Langenhove, L., & Baert, F. (2010). The problem of comparison in comparative regionalism. Review of International Studies, 36(3), 731–753. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000707De Klor, A. D., & Pimentel, L. O. (2004). O Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias do Mercosul [The Dispute Settlement System of Mercosur]. In A. D. de Klor, L. O. Pimentel, P. L. Kegel, & W. Barral. Solução de Controvérsias: OMC, União Europeia e Mercosul (pp. 141-233). Konrad-Adenauer-Stifung.Decisión sobre la suspensión de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela en el MERCO-SUR en applicación del Protocolo de Ushuaia sobre compromiso democrático en el MERCOSUR [Decision on the suspensión of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela in MERCOSUR in enforcing the Ushuaia Protocolo on democratic commitment in MER-COSUR, August 5, 2017. https://www.mercosur.int/documento/decision-sobre-la-suspension-de-venezuela-en-el-mercosur/Mercosul confirma a suspensão da Venezuela [Mercosur confirms the suspension of Ve-nezuela] (2016, December 2). Die Welt. https://www.dw.com/pt-br/mercosul-confirma-suspens%C3%A3o-da-venezuela/a-36615922Doctor, M. (2013). Prospects for deepening Mercosur integration: Economic asymmetry and institutional deficits. Review of International Political Economy, 20(3), 515–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.671763Donno, D. (2013). Elections and Democratization in Authoritarian Regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 703–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12013Drummond, M. C. (2011). A opção intergovernanmental do Mercosul e a reforma do Pro-tocolo de Ouro Preto [The intergovernmental option of Mercosur and the reform of the Protocol of Ouro Preto]. Universitas: Relações Internacionais, 9(1), 273-295. https://doi.org/10.5102/uri.v9i1.1382Economic Comission for Latin America and the Caribbean. (2018). Boletín de comercio exterior del MERCOSUR: El rol del MERCOSUR en la integración regional [Report on foreign trade in MERCOSUR: the role of MERCOSUR in regional integration]. United Nations. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/44298/1/S1801158_es.pdfEuropean Council (2021, October 13). Qualified majority. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/council-eu/voting-system/qualified-majority/Fawcett, L., & Gandois, H. (2010). Regionalism in Africa and the Middle East: Implica-tions for EU studies. European Integration, 32(6), 617–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2010.518719Feenstra, R. C.; Inklaar, R.; Timmer, M. P. (2015). The Next Generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150-3182. Available for download at www.ggdc.net/pwt.Ferrari, L., & Tachinardi, M. H. (2000, May 10). Mercosul cria política comum para compras [Mercosur creates common policy for procurements]. Gazeeta Mercantil. Hemeroteca de Política Externa Brasileira. https://hemerotecapeb.lantri.org/lantri/hemeroteca-ris-brasil-vigevani-miyamoto/brasil-america_latina/brasil-america_latina-003791.pdfFernandes, A., & Breve, N. (2001, June 14). Cavallo afirma poder de negociação do Mercosul [Cavallo afirms negotiating power of Mercosur]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B7.FHC quer bloco com instituições supranacionais [FHC wants bloc with supranational institutions]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B8.Figueiredo, O., Paraguassu, F., Salgueiro, S., & Ribas, S. (2001, July 7-8). Suspensas as negociações bilaterais [Bilateral negotiations suspended]. Gazeta Mercantil. Hemeroteca de Política Externa Brasileira. https://hemerotecapeb.lantri.org/lantri/hemeroteca-ris-brasil-vigevani-miyamoto/brasil-argentina/brasil-argentina-001234.pdfFisher adverte que Brasil não pode deter acordo [Fisher adverts that Brazil can not stop agreement]. (2000, December 11). O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B3.Flemes, D. (2007, June). Conceptualising Regional Power in International Relations: Les-sons from the South African Case. (GIGA Working Paper No. 53). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1000123Flemes, D. (2010). Brazil: Strategic Options in the Changing World Order. In D. Flemes (Ed.), Regional leadership in the global system: Ideas, interests and strategies of regional powers (pp. 93–112). Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Gaier, R. V. & Ayres, M. (2019, September 7) Acordo automotivo Brasil-Argentina prevê livre comércio em 2029 [Brazil-Argentina automotive agreement envisions free trade in 2029]. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/macro-argentinabrasil-acordo-idLTAKCN1VR2OYGenna, G. M., & Hiroi, T. (2007). Brazilian regional power in the development of Mer-cosul. Latin American Perspectives, 34(5), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0094582X07306237George, A., & Bennet, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sci-ences. MIT.Gilpin, R. (1975). U.S. power and the multinational corporation (Vol. 2). Basic Books.Gilpin, R. (2001). Global political economy. Princeton University Press.Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R. O., & Slaughter, A.-M. (2000). Introduction: Le-galization and world politics. International Organization, 54(3), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551262Gómez-Mera, L. (2005). Explaining the Survival of MERCOSUR: The Sources of Argen-tine-Brazilian Strategic Convergence. Journal of Latin American Studies, 37(1), 109–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X04008570Gómez-Mera, L. (2016). Lessons from Latin America: MERCOSUR. In D. H. Levine & Nagar, D. (Eds.), Region-Building in Africa (pp. 297–312). Palgrave Macmillan.Gonçalves, J. B. (2008). José Botafogo Gonçalves (testimony, 2008). Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Centro de Pesquisa e Documentação de História Contemporânea do Brasil (CPDOC). https://www.fgv.br/cpdoc/historal/arq/Entrevista1577.pdfGranato, L. (2021). Taking stock of the thirty years of Mercosur. Austral: Brazilian Jour-nal of Strategy & International Relations, 10(19), 9-29. https://doi.org/10.22456/2238-6912.112686Grieco, J. M. (1988). Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: A realist critique of the new-est liberal institutionalism. International Organization, 42(3), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027715Grieco, J. M. (1997). Systemic Sources of Variation in Regional Institutionalization in Western Europe, East Asia, and the Americas. In E. D. Mansfield & H. V. Milner (Eds.), The Political Economy of Regionalism (pp. 164–187). Columbia University Press.Haas, E. B. (2004). The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces (1950-1957) (3rd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press.Haftel, Y. Z. (2004). Violent conflict and regional institutionalization: A virtuous circle? [Doctoral thesis, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_olink/r/1501/10?p10_etd_subid=63451&clear=10Haftel, Y. Z. (2007). Designing for peace: Regional integration arrangements, institutional variation, and militarized interstate disputes. International Organization, 61(1), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070063Haftel, Y. Z. (2012). Regional economic institutions and conflict mitigation: Design, im-plementation, and the promise of peace. University of Michigan Press.Haftel, Y. Z. (2013). Commerce and institutions: Trade, scope, and the design of regional economic organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 8(3), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-012-9162-9Haftel, Y. Z., & Hofmann, S. C. (2017). Institutional authority and security cooperation within regional economic organizations. Journal of Peace Research, 54(4), 484-498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316675908Haftel, Y. Z., & Thompson, A. (2006). The independence of international organizations: Concept and applications. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(2), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022002705285288Haggard, S. (1997). The Political Economy of Regionalism in Asia and the Americas. In E. D. Mansfield & H. V. Milner (Eds.), The Political Economy of Regionalism (pp. 20–49). Columbia University Press.Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.xHancock, K. J. (2009). Regional Integration: Choosing Plutocracy. Palgrave Macmillan.Hartmann, C. (2016). Sub-Saharan Africa. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (pp. 271–294). Oxford University Press.Herbst, J. (2007). Crafting regional cooperation in Africa. In A. Acharya & A. I. Johnston (Eds.), Crafting cooperation: Regional international institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 129–180). Cambridge University Press.Hoffmann, A. R. (2015). Politicization and Legitimacy in MERCOSUR. In A. Hurrelmann, S. Schneider (Eds.), The Legitimacy of Regional Integration in Europe and the Americas. Transformations of the State. Palgrave Macmillan.Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2015). Delegation and pooling in international organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 10(3), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-014-9194-4Hurrell, A. (2005). Hegemony and Regional Governance in the Americas. In Fawcett, L. & Serrano M. (Eds.), Regionalism and Governance in the Americas: Continental Drift (pp. 185-207). Palgrave Macmillan.Iensue, G. (2016). MERCOSUL: Análise dos custos e benefícios no primeiro quartel de século da integração [MERCOSUR: Analysis of the costs and benefits in the first quarter of century of integration]. Revista de la Secretaría del Tribunal Permanente de Revisión, 4(8), 177-208. https://doi.org/10.16890/rstpr.a4.n8.p177Ikenberry, J. (2001). After Victory. Princeton University Press.International Monetary Fund (2023, February 1). Direction of Trade Statistics (DOTS). https://data.imf.org/?sk=9D6028D4-F14A-464C-A2F2-59B2CD424B85Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean (1999). MERCOSUR Report (1998-1999) (No. 5). Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/en/publication/mercosur-report-no-5-1998-1999Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean (2000). MERCOSUR Report (1999-2000) (No. 6). Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/en/mercosur-report-no-6-1999-2000Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean (2001). MERCOSUR Report (2000-2001) (No. 7). Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/en/mercosur-report-no-7-2000-2001Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean (2003). MERCOSUR Report (2001-2002) (No. 8). Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/en/mercosur-report-no-8-2001-2002Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean. (2004). MERCOSUR: In Search of a New Agenda. Rapporteur’s. Inter-American Development Bank - Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/MERCOSUR-In-search-of-a-New-Agenda.pdfInstitute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean. (2009). MERCOSUR Report (2007-2008) (No. 13). Inter-American Development Bank - Institute for the Inte-gration of Latin America and the Caribbean. https://publications.iadb.org/en/publication/mercosur-report-no-13-2007-2008Institute of Public Policies on Human Rights. (n.d.). Quiénes Somos [About Us]. https://www.ippdh.mercosur.int/quienes-somos/Kahler, M. (1995). International Institutions and the Political Economy of Integration. The Brooking Institution.Kaltenthaler, K., & Mora, F. O. (2002). Explaining Latin American economic integration: The case of Mercosur. Review of International Political Economy, 9(1), 72–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290110101108Keohane, R. O. (1980). The Theory of Hegemonic Stability and changes in International Economic Regimes. In O. R. Holsti, R. M. Siverson, & A. George. (Eds). Change in the International System. Westview.Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.Keohane, R. O. (1989). International Institutions and State Power. Westview Press.Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1973). Power and interdependence. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 15(4), 158-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00396337308441409Kindleberger, C. P. (1973). The World in Depression, 1929–1939. University of California Press.Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The Rational Design of International In-stitutions. International Organization, 55(4), 761–799. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801317193592Krapohl, S., Meissner, K. L., & Muntschick, J. (2013). Regional Powers as Leaders or Rambos? The Ambivalent Behaviour of Brazil and South Africa in Regional Economic Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(4), 879–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12116Krasner, S. D. (1976). State power and the structure of international trade. World Politics, 28(3), 317–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009974Krasner, S. D. (1983). International regimes. Cornell University Press.Krasner, S. D. (1991). Global communications and national power: Life on the Pareto frontier. World Politics, 43(3), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010398Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty. Princeton University Press.Kugler, J., & Arbetman, M. (1989). Choosing among measures of power: A review of the empirical record. In R. J. Stoll & M. D. Ward (Eds.), Power in world politics (pp. 49–77). Lynne Rienner Publishers.Kuntz, R. (2000, December 13). Jogo pesado na discussão da Alca [Difficult challenge in FTAA discussion]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B2.Lampreia, L. F. (2002). Mercosul: Reflexões Propectivas [Mercosur: Prospective Reflec-tions]. In C. Hugueney Filho & C. H. Cardim (Eds.), Grupo de Reflexão Prospectiva so-bre o Mercosul [Prospective Reflection Group on Mercosur] (p. 113-116). Fundação Ale-xandre de Gusmão.Laursen, F. (2003). Theoretical Perspectives on Comparative Regional Integration. In F. Laursen (Ed.), Comparative regional integration: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 3–30). Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Lemke, D. (2002). Regions of War and Peace. Cambridge University Press.Lemke, D. (2010). Dimensions of Hard Power: Regional Leadership and Material Capa-bilities. In D. Flemes (Ed.), Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers (pp. 31-50). Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Lenz, T. (2012). Spurred emulation: The EU and regional integration in Mercosur and SADC. West European Politics, 35(1), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.631319Lenz, T., & Marks, G. (2016). Regional Institutional Design. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (pp. 514–538). Oxford Uni-versity Press.Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2013). Informal governance and participation in non-democratic international organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 8, 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-012-9160-yMalamud, A. (2003). Presidentialism and Mercosur: A hidden cause for a successful expe-rience. In F. Laursen (Ed.), Comparative Regional Integration: Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 53–73). Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Malamud, A. (2005a). Mercosur turns 15: Between rising rhetoric and declining achieve-ment. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 18(3), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570500238068Malamud, A. (2005b). Presidential diplomacy and the institutional underpinnings of Mer-cosur: An empirical examination. Latin American Research Review, 40(1), 138–164. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1555368Malamud, A. (2008) La agenda interna del Mercosur: interdependencia, liderazgo, institu-cionalización [The internal agenda of Mercosur: interdependence, leadership, institutional-ization]. In G. Jaramillo (Ed.) Los nuevos enfoques de la integración: más allá del nuevo regionalismo [New integration approaches: beyond new regionalism] (pp. 115-136). FLACO, Sede Ecuador.Malamud, A. (2011). A leader without followers? The growing divergence between the regional and global performance of Brazilian foreign policy. Latin American Politics and Society, 53(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00123.xMalamud, A. (2012). Sovereignty is back, integration out: Latin American travails with regionalism. In J. Roy (Ed.), The State of the Union (s): The Eurozone Crisis, Comparative Regional Integration and the EU Model (pp. 177–190). Miami-Florida European Union Center/Jean Monnet Chair,Malamud, A. (2013). El Mercosur: misión cumplida [Mercosur: mission accomplished]. Revista SAAP, 7(2), 275-282. http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1853-19702013000200005&lng=es&nrm=isoMalamud, A. (2015). Interdependence, leadership and institutionalization: The triple defi-cit and fading prospects of MERCOSUR. In S. Dosenrode (Ed.), Limits to regional inte-gration (pp. 163–178). Routledge.Mallea, R., Spektor, M., & Wheeler, N. J. (2015). The Origins of Nuclear Cooperation: A Critical Oral History of Argentina and Brazil. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars & Fundação Getúlio Vargas. https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/bitstream/handle/10438/13865/ingles.pdfMansfield, E. D. (1993). Concentration, Polarity and the Distribution of Power. Interna-tional Studies Quarterly, 37(1), 105–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600833Mansfield, E. D., & Milner, H. V. (1999). The new wave of regionalism. International Organization, 53(3), 589–627. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899551002Mansfield, E. D., & Milner, H. V. (2012). Votes, Vetoes, and the Political Economy of In-ternational Trade Agreements. Princeton University Press.Mansfield, E. D., & Pevehouse, J. C. (2000). Trade Blocs, Trade Flows, and International Conflict. International Organization, 54(4), 775–808. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551361Mariano, M. P. (2015). A política externa brasileira e a integração regional: uma análise a partir do Mercosul [The Brazilian foreign policy and regional integration: an analysis from Mercosur]. Editora Unesp.Mariano, K. L. P., & Menezes, R. G. (2021). Três décadas de Mercosul: Institucionalida-de, capacidade estatal e baixa intensidade de integração [Three decades of Mercosur: Ins-titutionality, state capacity and low intensity of integration]. Lua Nova, 112, 147-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-147179/112Marin, D. C. (2001, June 20). Brasil e Argentina acertam ponteiros do Mercosul [Brazil and Argentina harmonize their position in Mercosur]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B5.Martins, E. M. O. (2006). Sistemática de Solução de Controvérsias do Mercosul: o Protocolo de Brasília e o Protocolo de Olivos [Dispute Settlement System of Mercosur: the Protocol of Brasília and the Protocol of Olivos]. Cadernos PROLAM/USP, 5(1), 79-93.Mattli, W. (1999). The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge University Press.Mearsheimer, J. (1994/1995). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539078Meissner, K. L. (2017). MERCOSUR. In S. Krapohl (Ed.), Regional Integration in the Global South: External Influence on Economic Cooperation in ASEAN, MERCOSUR and SADC (pp. 147–178). Palgrave Macmillan.Mercopress (2012, June 30). Mercosur Secretary General resigns and walks out from Mendoza summit. Mercopress. https://en.mercopress.com/2012/06/30/mercosur-secretary-general-resigns-and-walks-out-from-the-mendoza-summitMercopress (2021, July 8). Uruguay swears allegiance to Mercosur, but will negotiate in-dependently with third countries. Mercopress. https://en.mercopress.com/2021/07/08/uruguay-swears-allegiance-to-mercosur-but-will-negotiate-independently-with-third-countriesMercosul prepara o seu tribunal [Mercosur prepares its tribunal]. Gazeta Mercantil. Hemeroteca de Política Externa Brasileira. https://hemerotecapeb.lantri.org/lantri/hemeroteca-ris-brasil-vigevani-miyamoto/brasil-america_latina/brasil-america_latina-003020.pdfMERCOSUR Parliament. (n.d.). Historia [History]. https://www.parlamentomercosur.org/innovaportal/v/149/1/parlasur/historia.htmlMERCOSUR Secretariat. (2019, June). MERCOSUL: Estrutura instituticional de funcio-namento. [MERCOSUR: Institutional working framework] (Working Paper no. 02/2019). https://www.cartillaciudadania.mercosur.int/oldAssets/uploads/DT_SM-02_19%20-%20MCS_EstructuraFuncionamiento_PT.pdfMERCOSUR Secretariat. (2021). Informe Técnico de Comercio Exterior 2020 [Technical Report on Foreign Trade 2020]. https://www.mercosur.int/documento/informe-tecnico-de-comercio-exterior/MERCOSUR Secretariat. (2022). Relatório Semestral da Secretaria do MERCOSUL [Semester Report of the MERCOSUR Secretariat] (June 2022) (No. 32). Common Market of the South. https://www.mercosur.int/pt-br/documento/32-relatorio-semestral-da-secretaria-do-mercosul-junho-2022/MERCOSUR Social Institute. (2022). Acerca del ISM [About the MSI]. http://www.ismercosur.org/es/institucional/acerca-del-ism/Ministério da Economia. (n.d.). Comex Stat - General Exports and Imports. http://comexstat.mdic.gov.br/en/geralNabers, D. (2010). Power, leadership, and hegemony in international politics: The case of East Asia. Review of International Studies, 36(4), 931–949. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510001373Neumann, D. (1999, October 5). Lampreia diz que é preciso relançar Mercosul [Lampreia states that it is necessary to relaunch Mercosur]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B4.Nolte, D. (2010). How to compare regional powers: Analytical concepts and research top-ics. Review of International Studies, 36(4), 881–901. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051000135XOlson, M. (1971). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Revised edition). Harvard University Press.Palacios, A. (1999a, October 13). De la Rúa quer integração mais rápida entre sócios do Mercosul [De la Rúa wants faster integration between Mercosur partners]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, A17.Palacios, A. (1999b, November 16). Para embaixador, Mercosul carece de medida de impacto [For ambassador, Mercosur lacks impactful action]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, A8.Palacios, A. (2000a, March 25). Brasil e Argentina tentarão resolver outras pendências [Brazil and Argentina will try to solve other pending issues]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B10.Palacios, A. (2000b, April 7). Países definem nova agenda do Mercosul [Countries define new agenda of Mercosur]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B9.Palacios, A. (2001a, April 4). Ministro dispõe-se a retroceder na redução de tarifas alfandegárias [Minister shall backtrack on the reduction of customs tariffs]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B5.Palacios, A. (2001b, May 11). Mercosul precisa mudar, diz Giavarini [Mercosur must change, says Giavarini]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B6.Pedersen, T. (2002). Cooperative hegemony: Power, ideas and institutions in regional in-tegration. Review of International Studies, 28(4), 677–696. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210502006770Pena, C., Rozemberg, R. (2005, March). MERCOSUR: A different approach to institution-al development (FOCAL Policy Paper No. FPP-05-06). https://www.focal.ca/pdf/mercosur_Pena-Ro-zemberg_different%20approach%20institutional%20development_March%202005_FPP-05-06_e.pdfPereira, L.V. (1999) Toward the Common Market of the South: MERCOSUR’s Origins, Evolutions and Challenges. In R. Riordan (Ed.), MERCOSUR: Regional Integration, World Markets (pp. 7-24). Lynne Rienner Publishers.Perotti, A. D. (2001). Proyecto de Reformas al Protocolo de Brasilia. Una nueva oportunidad perdida [Project of reform to the Protocol of Brasília. A new lost opportunity]. Scientia Iuris, 5(6), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2002v5n0p1Perry, G. E., & Servén, L. (2003, June). The Anatomy of a Multiple Crisis: Why Was Argentina Special and What Can We Learn from it? (The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3081). The World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/18175Pevehouse, J. C. (2002). With a little help from my friends? Regional organizations and the consolidation of democracy. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 611–626. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088403Pfeifer, I., & Quadros, M. (2001, April 2). Brasil reage contra TEC na informática [Brazil reacts against common external tariff on computing products]. Gazeta Mercantil. Hemero-teca de Política Externa Brasileira. https://hemerotecapeb.lantri.org/lantri/hemeroteca-ris-brasil-vigevani-miyamoto/brasil-argentina/brasil-argentina-001400.pdfPierson, P. (1996). The path to European integration: A historical institutionalist analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 29(2), 123–163. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0010414096029002001Pietrafesa, P. A. (2011). Parlamento do Mercosul: formação, características e desafios [Mercosur Parliament: formation, characteristics and challenges]. Universitas: Relações Internacionais, 9(1), 199-226. https://doi.org/10.5102/uri.v9i1.1377Protocol of Brasília for the Solution of Controversies, December 17, 1991. http://www.sice.oas.org/trade/mrcsr/brasilia/pbrasiliaText_e.aspProtocol of Ouro Preto - Additional Protocol to the Treaty of Asunción on the Institu-tional Framework of MERCOSUR, December 17, 1994. http://www.sice.oas.org/trade/mrcsr/ourop/ourop_e.aspProtocolo Constitutivo do Parlamento do MERCOSUL [Constituve Protocol of the MERCOSUR Parliament], December 2, 2005, https://www.mercosur.int/pt-br/documento/protocolo-constitutivo-do-parlamento-mercosul/Rebossio, A. (2013, December 19). Paraguai volta atrás e aprova a entrada da Venezuela no Mercosul [Paraguay backtracks and approves the entry of Venezuela in Mercosur]. El País. https://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2013/12/19/internacional/1387413875_732555.htmlResende‐Santos, J. (2002). The origins of security cooperation in the southern cone. Latin American Politics and Society, 44(4), 89–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2002.tb00224.xReuters (2015, July 18). Bolivia to join Mercosur as full member. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/brazil-mercosur-bolivia-idUSE5N0V801V20150717Riggirozzi, P., & Tussie, D. (Eds.) (2012). The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism: The Case of Latin America. Springer.Rittner, D. (2014, August 13). Tribunal do Mercosul complete dez anos tentando fugir da irrelevância [Mercosur Tribunal reaches ten years trying to avoid irrelevance]. Valor Econômico. https://valor.globo.com/brasil/coluna/tribunal-do-mercosul-completa-dez-anos-tentando-fugir-da-irrelevancia.ghtmlRosamond, B. (2000). Theories of European Integration. Bloomsbury Publishing.Sanahuja, J. A. (2009). Del “regionalismo abierto” al “regionalismo post-liberal”. Crisis y cambio en la integración regional en América Latina [From “open regionalism” to “post-liberal regionalism”. Crisis and change in regional integration in Latin America]. In L. M. Alfonso, L. Peña, M. Vazquez (Eds.) Anuario de la Integración Regional de América La-tina y el Gran Caribe [Yearbook of Regional Integration of Latin America and the Great Caribbean] (2008-2009) (Nº 7). Coordinadora Regional de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales, 11-54. https://www.cries.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/anuario-integracion-2008-2009.pdfSandler, T. (1991, September). The Logic of Collective Action: Theory and Applications (Institute for Policy Reform No. IPR20). https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.294668Schelhase, M. (2010). The Successes, Failures and Future of Mercosur. In G. Mace, A. W. Cooper, & T. M. Shaw (Eds.), Inter-American Cooperation at a Crossroads (pp. 171–186). Palgrave Macmillan.Schneider, C. J. (2017). The political economy of regional integration. Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-023006Schirm, S. A. (2010). Leaders in need of followers: Emerging powers in global govern-ance. European Journal of International Relations, 16(2), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109342922Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2004). Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 661–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000248089Smith, J. M. (2000). The politics of dispute settlement design: Explaining legalism in re-gional trade pacts. International Organization, 54(1), 137–180. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551145Snidal, D. (1985). The limits of hegemonic stability theory. International Organization, 39(4), 579–614. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002703XSöderbaum, F. (2016). Old, New, and Comparative Regionalism: The History and Schol-arly Development of the Field. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (pp. 16–40). Oxford University Press.Sotero, P. (2000, October 17). Brasil responde a críticas dos EUA sobre Alca [Brazil answers to USA critics over the FTAA]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B18.Sotero, P. (2001, May 7). Cavallo nos EUA volta a atacar o Mercosul [Cavallo in the USA attacks Mercosur again]. O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, B1.Spektor, M. (2002). O Brasil e a Argentina entre a cordialidade oficial e o projeto de inte-gração: A política externa do governo de Ernesto Geisel (1974-1979). Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 45, 117–145. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292002000100005Spektor, M. (2010). Brazil: The Underlying Ideas of Regional Policies. In D. Flemes (Ed.), Regional leadership in the global system: Ideas, interests and strategies of regional powers (pp. 191–206). Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Sweet, A. S., & Sandholtz, W. (1998). Integration, Supranational Governance, and the Institutionalization of the European Polity. In A. Sweet & W. Sandholtz (Eds.), European Integration and Supranational Governance (pp. 1–26). Oxford University Press.Sweet, A.S., Sandholtz, W., & Fligstein, N. (2001). The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford University Press.Tachinardi, M. L. (1995, October 20). Brasil, entre os interesses nacionais e os do Mercosul [Brazil, between national interests and those of Mercosur]. Gazeta Mercantil. Hemeroteca de Política Externa Brasileira. https://hemerotecapeb.lantri.org/lantri/hemeroteca-ris-brasil-vigevani-miyamoto/brasil-america_latina/brasil-america_latina-002954.pdfTallberg, J., & Smith, J. M. (2014). Dispute settlement in world politics: States, supranational prosecutors, and compliance. European Journal of International Relations, 20(1), 118-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661114345Taylor, S. (2016). Region-Building in Southern Africa. In D. H. Levine & N. Dawn (Eds.), Region-Building in Africa (pp. 157–174). Palgrave Macmillan.Télam (2005, October 25). Por primera vez se vota por legisladores argentinos para el Par-lasur [For the first time Argentina votes for Parlasur legislators]. Télam. https://www.telam.com.ar/notas/201510/124723-elecciones-2015-voto-popular-legisladores-parlasur.htmlTorrent, R. (2000). Três idéias sobre a institucionalização do MERCOSUL [Three ideas on MERCOSUR institutionalization]. Revista Brasileira de Comércio Exterior, 62.Treaty of Asunción for the establishment of a Common Market between the Argentine Republic, the Federal Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Eastern Re-public of Uruguay, March 26, 1991, http://www.sice.oas.org/trade/mrcsr/TreatyAsun_e.aspUE e Mercosul apressam o passo [UE and Mercosur hasten speed]. (2001, March 26). O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil, A3.United Nations. (2021). Statistical Yearbook 2021 edition. Sixty-fourth issue. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publications/statistical-yearbook/United Nations Development Programme. (2021). Human Development Report 2020. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2020Uruguai e EUA estão negociando um pacto comercial [Uruguay and USA negotiating trade agreement]. (2001, May ). O Estado de São Paulo: Edição Brasil,Vaz, A. C. (2002). Cooperação, integração e processo negociador: A construção do Mer-cosul [Cooperation, integration and negotiation process: the construction of Mercosur]. IBRI.Veiga, P. M. (2004, July). MERCOSUR’s Institutionalization Agenda: The Challenges of a Project in Crisis (IDB-INTAL Working Paper -SITI- 06E). https://publications.iadb.org/en/mercosurs-institutionalization-agenda-challenges-project-crisisVeiga, P. M., & Rios, S. P. (2002). O Mercosul na encruzilhada: uma agenda para os pró-ximos anos [Mercosur at the crossroads: an agenda for the next years]. In C. Hugueney Filho & C.H. Cardim (Eds.), Grupo de Reflexão Prospectiva sobre o Mercosul [Prospecti-ve Reflection Group on Mercosur] (p. 161-168). Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão.World Trade Organization. (2017). A Handbook on the WTO Dispute Settlement System (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.Yoo, I. T. (2017). Power concentration or parity? The conditional influence of power dis-tribution in regional economic integration. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 17(2), 203–232. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcw007 zh_TW
