學術產出-期刊論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 公害民事責任程序中之舉證責任減輕──評最高法院110年度台上字第50號民事判決
其他題名 Alleviation of the Onus of Proof in Public Nuisance Civil Cases - Comment on No.50 Civil Judgement (2021) of Supreme Court
作者 姜世明
Chiang, Shyh-ming
貢獻者 法律系
關鍵詞 公害; 舉證責任; 證明度降低; 合理蓋然性; 舉證責任減輕
Public nuisance; Onus of proof; Burden of proof; Reduction of standard of proof; Reasonable probability alleviation of the onus of proof
日期 2022-12
上傳時間 13-十二月-2023 13:31:17 (UTC+8)
摘要 公害或大型職災之民事責任程序,被害人主張不同請求權會面臨不同之證明負擔程度,部分請求權之要件事實會造成被害人之證明困難,對此,除立法上可思考無過失責任、危險責任、舉證責任轉換、情報請求權等建制之外,個案處理時,法院自有斟酌事件類型,必要時對於被害人為舉證責任減輕。然而,究竟在何等條件下乃得啟動何等舉證責任減輕,乃實務上應具體說明者。對於舉證責任減輕之運用,宜探求及說明個案所存在之具體不平等或領域及證據之偏在性,採取對稱之減輕方法,始能妥適實踐舉證責任法則之公平指標。
Victims of public nuisance events or serious occupational accidents are faced with different levels of burden of proof when they apply to civil courts for compensation for damages, and some essential legal elements of rights are difficult to prove for the plaintiffs. Hence, apart from contemplating legislative approaches such as setting strict liability, dangerous activities liability, reversing the burden of proof and right to information in civil law, judges can also alleviate the onus of proof on the plaintiff’s side when necessary depending on different situations case by case. At the same time, judges should also explain specifically the reason why they alleviate the burden of proof whenever they do so. Acceptable reasons can be inequality between the parties or difficulty for one party to access evidence, and the way of reducing the burden of proof should correspond to the level of such inequality or difficulty.
關聯 月旦法學雜誌, No.331, pp.201-215
資料類型 article
DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.53106/1025593133112
dc.contributor 法律系
dc.creator (作者) 姜世明
dc.creator (作者) Chiang, Shyh-ming
dc.date (日期) 2022-12
dc.date.accessioned 13-十二月-2023 13:31:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 13-十二月-2023 13:31:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 13-十二月-2023 13:31:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/148650-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 公害或大型職災之民事責任程序,被害人主張不同請求權會面臨不同之證明負擔程度,部分請求權之要件事實會造成被害人之證明困難,對此,除立法上可思考無過失責任、危險責任、舉證責任轉換、情報請求權等建制之外,個案處理時,法院自有斟酌事件類型,必要時對於被害人為舉證責任減輕。然而,究竟在何等條件下乃得啟動何等舉證責任減輕,乃實務上應具體說明者。對於舉證責任減輕之運用,宜探求及說明個案所存在之具體不平等或領域及證據之偏在性,採取對稱之減輕方法,始能妥適實踐舉證責任法則之公平指標。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Victims of public nuisance events or serious occupational accidents are faced with different levels of burden of proof when they apply to civil courts for compensation for damages, and some essential legal elements of rights are difficult to prove for the plaintiffs. Hence, apart from contemplating legislative approaches such as setting strict liability, dangerous activities liability, reversing the burden of proof and right to information in civil law, judges can also alleviate the onus of proof on the plaintiff’s side when necessary depending on different situations case by case. At the same time, judges should also explain specifically the reason why they alleviate the burden of proof whenever they do so. Acceptable reasons can be inequality between the parties or difficulty for one party to access evidence, and the way of reducing the burden of proof should correspond to the level of such inequality or difficulty.
dc.format.extent 130 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) 月旦法學雜誌, No.331, pp.201-215
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公害; 舉證責任; 證明度降低; 合理蓋然性; 舉證責任減輕
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Public nuisance; Onus of proof; Burden of proof; Reduction of standard of proof; Reasonable probability alleviation of the onus of proof
dc.title (題名) 公害民事責任程序中之舉證責任減輕──評最高法院110年度台上字第50號民事判決
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) Alleviation of the Onus of Proof in Public Nuisance Civil Cases - Comment on No.50 Civil Judgement (2021) of Supreme Court
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.53106/1025593133112
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://dx.doi.org/10.53106/1025593133112