1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 文學院
  4. 期刊論文
  5. Item

學術產出-期刊論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 規約型 vs. 意圖型的話語施事行為：「話語施事失能」如何可能？
Conventional Illocutions vs. Intentional Illocutions: How Is Illocutionary Disablement Possible?
作者 鄭光明
Cheng, Kuang-ming
貢獻者 哲學系
關鍵詞 藍騰; 傑克森; 話語施事失能; 奧斯丁的言語行為理論; 史特勞森
Rae Langton; Daniel Jacobson; Illocutionary disablement; John L. Austin's speech act theory; P. F. Strawson
日期 2023-12
上傳時間 26-三月-2024 15:09:23 (UTC+8)
摘要 藍騰（Rae Langton）採取奧斯丁（John L. Austin）的「話語施事行為」概念，並認為色情刊物會使得婦女遭遇「話語施事失能」（illocutionary disablement），而且婦女難以擺脫「話語施事失能」。對此，傑克森（Daniel Jacobson）認為一旦我們採取史特勞森（P. F. Strawson）的「話語施事行為」概念，則色情刊物並不會使得婦女遭遇「話語施事失能」。在本文中，筆者將主張：（i）即使我們採取史特勞森的「話語施事行為」概念，婦女還是可能會遭遇「話語施事失能」，因此傑克森的批評無法成立；（ii）即使如此，婦女卻可以輕易擺脫「話語施事失能」，可見藍騰的「婦女難以擺脫『話語施事失能』」此一主張，無法成立。
As Rae Langton has famously argued, relying heavily on J. L. Austin's How to Do Things with Words, pornography silences women and causes women to be illocutionarily disabled in some sexual contexts so that they are unable to refuse sex by saying 'no'. Call this view the Silencing thesis. Daniel Jacobson thinks that the Silencing thesis must be wrong because pornography will not cause women to be illocutionarily disabled if we follow P. F. Strawson's speech act theory. In this paper, I defend the Silencing thesis. I will argue that, following Strawson's speech act theory, pornography will also silence women. Nevertheless, I will argue that women can get rid of illocutionary disablement easily if we follow Strawson's speech act theory.
關聯 東吳哲學學報, No.47, pp.65-104
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 哲學系
dc.creator (作者) 鄭光明
dc.creator (作者) Cheng, Kuang-ming
dc.date (日期) 2023-12
dc.date.accessioned 26-三月-2024 15:09:23 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 26-三月-2024 15:09:23 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 26-三月-2024 15:09:23 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/150549-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 藍騰（Rae Langton）採取奧斯丁（John L. Austin）的「話語施事行為」概念，並認為色情刊物會使得婦女遭遇「話語施事失能」（illocutionary disablement），而且婦女難以擺脫「話語施事失能」。對此，傑克森（Daniel Jacobson）認為一旦我們採取史特勞森（P. F. Strawson）的「話語施事行為」概念，則色情刊物並不會使得婦女遭遇「話語施事失能」。在本文中，筆者將主張：（i）即使我們採取史特勞森的「話語施事行為」概念，婦女還是可能會遭遇「話語施事失能」，因此傑克森的批評無法成立；（ii）即使如此，婦女卻可以輕易擺脫「話語施事失能」，可見藍騰的「婦女難以擺脫『話語施事失能』」此一主張，無法成立。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) As Rae Langton has famously argued, relying heavily on J. L. Austin's How to Do Things with Words, pornography silences women and causes women to be illocutionarily disabled in some sexual contexts so that they are unable to refuse sex by saying 'no'. Call this view the Silencing thesis. Daniel Jacobson thinks that the Silencing thesis must be wrong because pornography will not cause women to be illocutionarily disabled if we follow P. F. Strawson's speech act theory. In this paper, I defend the Silencing thesis. I will argue that, following Strawson's speech act theory, pornography will also silence women. Nevertheless, I will argue that women can get rid of illocutionary disablement easily if we follow Strawson's speech act theory.
dc.format.extent 118 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) 東吳哲學學報, No.47, pp.65-104
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 藍騰; 傑克森; 話語施事失能; 奧斯丁的言語行為理論; 史特勞森
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Rae Langton; Daniel Jacobson; Illocutionary disablement; John L. Austin's speech act theory; P. F. Strawson
dc.title (題名) 規約型 vs. 意圖型的話語施事行為：「話語施事失能」如何可能？
dc.title (題名) Conventional Illocutions vs. Intentional Illocutions: How Is Illocutionary Disablement Possible?
dc.type (資料類型) article