| dc.contributor | 中文系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 車行健 | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2022-05 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 3-七月-2024 13:21:54 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 3-七月-2024 13:21:54 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 3-七月-2024 13:21:54 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152211 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 國立政治大學中文系的經學整體成就，包含教學、研究與社會推廣，累積了豐厚的果實，構成戰後臺灣經學的重要組成內容，而其基礎則由復校初期的第一代學人們所奠定下來的。雖然政大中文系是由出身南京中央大學的高明先生所創立，且早年的師資中也不少是與中央大學（包括其前身東南大學）有所關聯，如祁述祖、王先漢，因此難免會給人政大中文系屬於南雍一脈的聯想。不過在高明之外，亦有出身北京大學的熊公哲和劉太希，和畢業於廈門大學且又曾東渡日本早稻田大學求學的王夢鷗。又有畢業自上海暨南大學的盧元駿和四川大學的潘光晟。這些與經學有關，可以視之為經學領域的學人（雖然有的也同時兼跨其他領域），他們在課程的講授、學生的指導、學術論文的發表、專著的出版和普及讀物的寫作方面，皆有其各自的表現與貢獻。然而他們學術的師承和淵源為何？其所表現出來的治學傾向和學術風格又為何？是有較一致性的趨向呢（如所謂的章黃之學、小學通經學）？或是多元並存的狀況？以及更重要的是，他們在政大中文系共事的數十年中，是否表現出具有標識性的經學整體學風？以及在經學研究上發展出具特色的成果而足為後人楷式者？對這些問題的探討，不但可對政大中文系既往的經學實績獲致更全面深入的認識，以做為後繼者參考的依據；且亦能從戰後臺灣經學發展的整體脈絡中，對其進行客觀公允地評估判斷。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The department of Chinese Literature of National Chengchi University has outstanding contribution in education, academic research and social participation. Especially its contribution in Classics study, which was established by the first generation scholars during the early age of recalibration, was important to the postwar Classics study in Taiwan. Although Gou-Ming, the founder of the department of Chinese Literature of NCCU, came from Central University in Nanjing, and quite a lot teachers in it during the early age were related to CU(including the predecessor Southeast University), so it gives an impression that the department of Chinese Literature of NCCU is belong to the school of Nan-Yong.But besides Gou-Ming, Shiung Gong-Zhe and Lui Tai-Xi were both graduated from Beijing University. Wang Mong-Ou was graduated from Xiamen University and studied abroad to Waseda University in Japan. Also with Lou Jun-Yuan was graduated from Chi Nan University in Shanhai, and Pan Guang-Sheng was graduated from Sichuan University.These Classics study connected scholars made great contribution to educating, postgraduate students guiding, academic papers reporting, books publishing and factual books writing.However, who’s they sat the feet of? what’s the source of their knowledge? And what’s the style of their studies? Are they tend to be consistent(like the school of Zhang-Huang)? Or are multiple coexistence? The most important is that they performed the identity style of classics study or not, and became a model for posterity with their distinctive results in classics study? By exploring these issues,we can not only have a deeper understanding to the achievement of classics study in the department of Chinese Literature of NCCU but give value of providing successor references, and we can also make an objective assessment by the overall context of the development of post-war Taiwan classics studies. | |
| dc.format.extent | 116 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 科技部, MOST109-2410-H004-144, 109.08-110.07 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 政大中文系; 戰後臺灣經學; 南雍; 高明; 王夢鷗 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | The Department of Chinese Literature of National Chengchi University; post-war Taiwan classics studies; the school of Nan-Yong; Gou-Ming; Wang Mong-Ou | |
| dc.title (題名) | 國立政治大學在臺復校初期中文系經學領域學人的學術淵源與學風表現 | |
| dc.title (題名) | The Academic Origin and Performance of Study Style of the Scholars in Classics Study Field during the Early Age of Recalibration in the Department of Chinese Literature of National Chengchi University | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | report | |
